Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
•
0 likes•14 views
The Nethaji Transport Workers Union filed a writ petition against the Secretary of the Tamil Nadu Transport Department, the Transport Commissioner, and the Managing Director of the Tamilnadu State Metropolitan Transport Corporation. The union sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider their representation dated January 27, 2016 regarding grievances about GPS machines and their desire to revert to manual ticketing. The court noted that adopting new technologies like GPS machines is necessary due to developments and that GPS prevents problems, but dismissed the petition since policy decisions are not for the court to opine on, directing the third respondent to consider the representation on its merits according to law.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
A commented history of Transantiago
By Juan Carlos Muñoz. Presented on Day Two of Transforming Transportation. Washington, D.C. January 15, 2010. www.transformingtransportation2010.org
2014-2015 Rules and Regulations Cheat Sheet
The document outlines the parking rules and regulations for the 2014-2015 academic year at the university. It provides information on where students can and cannot park, details about prior arrangements and appeals for parking citations. It also summarizes the transportation services available, including daily shuttles to local shopping areas and downtown Richmond, as well as campus safety shuttles running in the evenings.
Transportation Improvements
This document summarizes transportation improvements and issues with the MTA subway and bus services in New York City. It discusses delays caused by passengers holding open doors, litter on tracks, and fare evasion. Solutions proposed include community cleanups of stations, police enforcement of fares, and having medical staff on trains. The document also suggests assigning passengers to specific train cars to reduce crowding, providing WiFi on platforms, and running more trains during rush hours. Overall, the document analyzes problems with MTA services and offers recommendations to improve efficiency and address delays.
Community architecture and urban design 7
The Philippine National Railways (PNR) is the oldest and longest railway in the Philippines, beginning operations in 1875. It once operated over 479km of routes but now faces problems like illegal settlements, lack of maintenance, and security issues. The design of some stations is outdated and too small, without proper barriers, toilets, or security. Riding the PNR can feel uncomfortable due to overcrowding, and safety issues exist like platforms not level with trains and parts of the track missing or rusted. Renovating stations, improving sanitation, security, and maintenance would help the PNR better serve commuters.
Drt g.selvam
The petitioner, a borrower with a pending application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal in Coimbatore, sought an order prohibiting the respondent from taking property possession. The court noted a presiding officer was available to handle the case. While not interfering with the Tribunal's functions, the court directed it to dispose of the pending application within 8 weeks. The order stated any consequential possession actions would be subject to the Tribunal's ruling. The writ petition was then disposed of without costs.
Drt victory knit fashions
The petitioner, a borrower of the respondent bank, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent the bank from taking further action or possession based on a sale in September 2019 until an appeal was filed and disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal in Coimbatore. While the petitioner had agreed to hand over possession by September 7th, they also filed an application challenging the bank's order under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. The court directed the tribunal to number the application and consider it within two weeks, and maintain the status quo until then.
Thenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangam
The petitioner, an association of marriage brokers, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider their representation dated April 20, 2020. In their representation, the association sought monetary relief for its member brokers who had become jobless due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The court directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within six weeks and pass orders on its merits in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly without costs.
E.mohanammal
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
Recommended
A commented history of Transantiago
By Juan Carlos Muñoz. Presented on Day Two of Transforming Transportation. Washington, D.C. January 15, 2010. www.transformingtransportation2010.org
2014-2015 Rules and Regulations Cheat Sheet
The document outlines the parking rules and regulations for the 2014-2015 academic year at the university. It provides information on where students can and cannot park, details about prior arrangements and appeals for parking citations. It also summarizes the transportation services available, including daily shuttles to local shopping areas and downtown Richmond, as well as campus safety shuttles running in the evenings.
Transportation Improvements
This document summarizes transportation improvements and issues with the MTA subway and bus services in New York City. It discusses delays caused by passengers holding open doors, litter on tracks, and fare evasion. Solutions proposed include community cleanups of stations, police enforcement of fares, and having medical staff on trains. The document also suggests assigning passengers to specific train cars to reduce crowding, providing WiFi on platforms, and running more trains during rush hours. Overall, the document analyzes problems with MTA services and offers recommendations to improve efficiency and address delays.
Community architecture and urban design 7
The Philippine National Railways (PNR) is the oldest and longest railway in the Philippines, beginning operations in 1875. It once operated over 479km of routes but now faces problems like illegal settlements, lack of maintenance, and security issues. The design of some stations is outdated and too small, without proper barriers, toilets, or security. Riding the PNR can feel uncomfortable due to overcrowding, and safety issues exist like platforms not level with trains and parts of the track missing or rusted. Renovating stations, improving sanitation, security, and maintenance would help the PNR better serve commuters.
Drt g.selvam
The petitioner, a borrower with a pending application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal in Coimbatore, sought an order prohibiting the respondent from taking property possession. The court noted a presiding officer was available to handle the case. While not interfering with the Tribunal's functions, the court directed it to dispose of the pending application within 8 weeks. The order stated any consequential possession actions would be subject to the Tribunal's ruling. The writ petition was then disposed of without costs.
Drt victory knit fashions
The petitioner, a borrower of the respondent bank, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent the bank from taking further action or possession based on a sale in September 2019 until an appeal was filed and disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal in Coimbatore. While the petitioner had agreed to hand over possession by September 7th, they also filed an application challenging the bank's order under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. The court directed the tribunal to number the application and consider it within two weeks, and maintain the status quo until then.
Thenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangam
The petitioner, an association of marriage brokers, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider their representation dated April 20, 2020. In their representation, the association sought monetary relief for its member brokers who had become jobless due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The court directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within six weeks and pass orders on its merits in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly without costs.
E.mohanammal
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
ORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMEN
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the High Court of Madras seeking to quash the charges framed against him in session case no. 128 of 2017 before the Fast Track Mahila Court in Tiruppur. The prosecution argued that there were specific allegations against the petitioner to attract the offenses of abetment of suicide and cruelty by husband or relatives under sections 306 and 498A of IPC. While the petitioner claimed to be innocent, the High Court held that the trial court had applied its judicial mind properly and found a prima facie case against the petitioner based on the materials on record. Referring to a previous judgment, the High Court dismissed the petition, noting that the correctness of the allegations must be decided during trial
BAIL APPLICATION
The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard a criminal revision case regarding a bounced cheque. The petitioner had issued a cheque for Rs. 39,507 to the respondent for food purchases that bounced. The lower courts had convicted the petitioner, but a settlement was reached during the High Court hearing. The parties filed to compound the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Noting this and that the offense was compoundable, the High Court allowed compounding, set aside the conviction, and acquitted the petitioner per Section 320(8) of the CrPC.
Tambaram municipality
The petitioner filed a writ petition against the Tambaram Municipality Commissioner (1st respondent) seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the commissioner to take further action pursuant to a notice issued regarding an unauthorized construction. The municipality stated in its counter that it found no unauthorized construction after inspection other than a fertility clinic operation. The municipality also prepared a note to withdraw the original notice. Considering the municipality's submission and noting that the petitioner did not object, the court closed the writ petition and the related miscellaneous petition.
Sapthagiri transport order
The petitioner challenged an order from the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court that admitted the petitioner's appeal of an assessment by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner subject to depositing 75% of the disputed amount. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's conditional order, noting that 75% deposit is required by law for appeals and found no reason to interfere with the Tribunal not waiving the deposit despite the petitioner's financial difficulties. The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order.
Land Dispute
The Purchaser purchased Ground Floor alone and while purchasing Ground Floor the Seller agreed not to construct Second Floor. But the First Floor Purchaser, planned to construct Second Floor and the Ground Floor Purchaser success before the Court
FIR Direction
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to
direct the respondent to register FIR, investigate and file a final
report on the complaint dated 12.08.2015 given by the petitioner.
2
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
3. On a complaint lodged by one Ramachandran (the first
petitioner herein), a case in Crime No.21 of 2014 has been
registered by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,
Tiruvallulur, against Kannan Iyer (A1), who was working as
Manager in Central Bank of India, Pattaraiperumbudur Branch. The
allegation against the accused is that, he has forged the signature
of Bank customers and had defalcated the amounts. Now these
petitioners have given a complaint dated 12.08.2015 against one
Sathyamurthy, Viswanathan and Emanuel, whom the petitioners
alleged were accomplices of the said Kannan Iyer.
4. In the considered opinion of this Court, no second FIR.,
can be registered for the same transaction. During the course of
investigation, if material surfaces about the involvement of said
accused, it is needless to state that the Police shall make them as
accused and take action in accordance with law.
cancel the patta
The petitioner claims ownership in respect of the lands
situated in Survey Nos.34/2, 35/13, 35/1, 35/8, 35/9 and 13/2
situated at Jagirmangalam Village, Thirvalangadu Firka, Tiruttani
Taluk, Thiruvallur District and the properties are ancestral in nature
and he is cultivating the lands. According to the petitioner by playing
fraud the 5th respondent managed to obtain a patta in his name and in
this regard, he has submitted an application to the 2nd respondent who
has called him for an enquiry vide memo dated 11.02.2010 and
according to the petitioner he has also attended the enquiry on
19.02.2010 and since, nothing had happened thereafter, came forward
to file this writ petition.
3. Heard the submissions of Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional
Government Pleader, who accepts notice for the respondents 1 to 4.
3
4. Though, the petitioner has prayed for a larger relief, this
Court in the facts and circumstances of the case, permits the
petitioner to submit one more representation to the 2nd respondent for
early disposal of his petition dated 04.02.2010 and referred to in the
summons vide Na.Ka.No.469/2010/A2 dated 11.02.2010 within a
period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order
and on receipt of the same, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider
the representation on merits and in accordance with law, after putting
the 5th respondent on notice and pass orders as expeditiously as
possible and not later than eight weeks, thereafter and inform the
decision taken to the petitioner as well as the 5th respondent.
Tamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery Industry
These writ petitions are filed for issue of a Writ of Mandamus
forbearing the respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants,
representatives and/or anyone claiming through or under them and/or any
other person from in any manner applying the impugned Government Order in
G.O.(2D) No. 59, Labour And Employment (J1) Department dated 10.10.2014
and published in Part II-Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette dated
03.12.2014 on the petitioners, who are differently placed as Hosiery
Manufactory and not as Tailoring Industry.
2. When the writ petitions are taken up, it is brought to the
notice of this Court that a Division Bench of this Court, in similar
circumstances, in W.P. Nos. 36077 & 36078 of 2015, on 17.01.2016, held as
follows:
"4. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents
fairly submits that the aforestated G.O.(2D) No. 59, Labour and
Employment (J1) Department dated 10.10.2014 is not applicable
to the employment in Hosiery Manufactory.
5. In view of the foregoings, it is established that G.O.
(2D) No. 59, Labour and Employment (J1) Department dated
10.10.2014, published in Part II Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu
4
Government Gazette dated 03.12.2014 is not applicable to the
employment in Hosiery Manufactory. Accordingly, these writ
petitions are disposed of. ..."
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
the petitioner has not given any representation to the
respondent and straightaway approached this Court, by filing this Writ
Petition, stating that this Court should direct the respondent to accept the
entire amount in 24 equal installments
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking to remove the allegation from an FIR that he was driving under the influence at the time of a car accident. The court denied the request, stating that the allegation is part of the complainant's version and subject to ongoing investigation. While the allegation alone does not prove drunken driving or prevent an insurance claim, it is not appropriate for the court to remove a statement that is being investigated. The petition was therefore closed without modifying the FIR.
Leshark
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated August 22, 2017 regarding relief under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995. However, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner issued a circular on March 26, 2018 addressing this issue. As the petitioner's representation had already been considered through this circular, the court determined no further adjudication was required. Therefore, the court closed the writ petition without any order for costs.
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
This document is a summary of a court case from the Madras High Court regarding the revision of minimum wage rates for employees in the tailoring industry in Tamil Nadu. The petitioners challenged the government order revising wages, arguing it violated principles of natural justice and procedures outlined in the Minimum Wages Act. The court examined arguments from both petitioners and the state government. It ultimately dismissed the petitions and allowed the government's appeal, upholding the revised minimum wage rates.
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
The Madras High Court heard a case between Tirupur South Rotary Nursery and Primer School and the Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner. The school sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider a representation dated April 23, 2015. However, in light of a previous order remanding a similar case, the court determined it was not necessary to issue the writ at this stage. The court closed the case but left it open for the school to pursue remedies after the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner issues an order per previous court directions.
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014
The Madras High Court heard a petition filed by S. Soundari seeking a direction to the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a report based on her complaint of abuse by her husband B. Suresh. The Court ordered B. Suresh to be impleaded as the second respondent. Considering this is a matrimonial issue, the Court directed the police to summon both parties to inquire into the matter and try to arrive at an amicable solution, while also dealing with it according to law. The petition was then disposed of on these terms.
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)
The Madras High Court heard a petition from S. Soundari seeking a direction for police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a report based on her complaint of abuse by her husband B. Suresh. The court ordered B. Suresh to be impleaded as the second respondent. Considering this is a matrimonial issue, the court directed police to summon both S. Soundari and B. Suresh to inquire into the matter and try to arrive at an amicable solution, dealing with it according to law. The petition was then disposed of on these terms.
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
The Madras High Court heard a case between Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd. and the Employees Provident Fund Organization. Royal Yarns filed a writ petition challenging proceedings initiated under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act, claiming they could not honor commitments on time but were ready to remit the entire amount in 24 equal installments. However, the Court said no direction could be issued to accept payment in 24 installments and directed Royal Yarns to submit a representation requesting payment in 10 equal installments, which the Employees Provident Fund Organization shall consider. The writ petition was then disposed of without costs.
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
The document discusses a writ petition regarding the installation of a statue of actor Sivaji Ganesan in Chennai, India. It provides background on the case, including that the government had announced plans to erect the statue but installed it in a different location than planned, raising disputes. The key issues debated are whether the statue's location violates an undertaking given to the Supreme Court regarding not allowing structures on public roads, and if it obstructs traffic flow. An earlier court order found the undertaking would apply to Chennai as well. The document analyzes these core issues and discusses arguments from both sides.
N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015
The petitioner claims ownership of certain lands that have been ancestral property and have been cultivated by the petitioner. However, the fifth respondent fraudulently obtained land pattas for the properties. The petitioner submitted an application to the second respondent for an inquiry, and attended the inquiry on the scheduled date. As there was no subsequent action, the petitioner filed this writ petition. The court allowed the petitioner to submit another representation to the second respondent within two weeks for expeditious disposal of the matter. The second respondent must consider the representation on merits after notice to the fifth respondent, and pass orders within eight weeks informing both parties of the decision.
List new2
The document discusses four writ petitions regarding the applicability of a government order (G.O.(2D) No.59) to employment in hosiery manufactories. It notes that an earlier order from the Division Bench of the Court held that the government order does not apply to such employment. Relying on this earlier order, the counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petitions can be disposed of. The Court directs the Registry to list all connected matters together for common disposal in light of the earlier order and grants an interim injunction in the meantime.
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court denied the request, noting that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age at marriage were not a fit case for a positive direction to the police. The court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court instead.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
More Related Content
More from S.Ezhil Raj
ORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMEN
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the High Court of Madras seeking to quash the charges framed against him in session case no. 128 of 2017 before the Fast Track Mahila Court in Tiruppur. The prosecution argued that there were specific allegations against the petitioner to attract the offenses of abetment of suicide and cruelty by husband or relatives under sections 306 and 498A of IPC. While the petitioner claimed to be innocent, the High Court held that the trial court had applied its judicial mind properly and found a prima facie case against the petitioner based on the materials on record. Referring to a previous judgment, the High Court dismissed the petition, noting that the correctness of the allegations must be decided during trial
BAIL APPLICATION
The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard a criminal revision case regarding a bounced cheque. The petitioner had issued a cheque for Rs. 39,507 to the respondent for food purchases that bounced. The lower courts had convicted the petitioner, but a settlement was reached during the High Court hearing. The parties filed to compound the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Noting this and that the offense was compoundable, the High Court allowed compounding, set aside the conviction, and acquitted the petitioner per Section 320(8) of the CrPC.
Tambaram municipality
The petitioner filed a writ petition against the Tambaram Municipality Commissioner (1st respondent) seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the commissioner to take further action pursuant to a notice issued regarding an unauthorized construction. The municipality stated in its counter that it found no unauthorized construction after inspection other than a fertility clinic operation. The municipality also prepared a note to withdraw the original notice. Considering the municipality's submission and noting that the petitioner did not object, the court closed the writ petition and the related miscellaneous petition.
Sapthagiri transport order
The petitioner challenged an order from the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court that admitted the petitioner's appeal of an assessment by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner subject to depositing 75% of the disputed amount. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's conditional order, noting that 75% deposit is required by law for appeals and found no reason to interfere with the Tribunal not waiving the deposit despite the petitioner's financial difficulties. The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order.
Land Dispute
The Purchaser purchased Ground Floor alone and while purchasing Ground Floor the Seller agreed not to construct Second Floor. But the First Floor Purchaser, planned to construct Second Floor and the Ground Floor Purchaser success before the Court
FIR Direction
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to
direct the respondent to register FIR, investigate and file a final
report on the complaint dated 12.08.2015 given by the petitioner.
2
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
3. On a complaint lodged by one Ramachandran (the first
petitioner herein), a case in Crime No.21 of 2014 has been
registered by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,
Tiruvallulur, against Kannan Iyer (A1), who was working as
Manager in Central Bank of India, Pattaraiperumbudur Branch. The
allegation against the accused is that, he has forged the signature
of Bank customers and had defalcated the amounts. Now these
petitioners have given a complaint dated 12.08.2015 against one
Sathyamurthy, Viswanathan and Emanuel, whom the petitioners
alleged were accomplices of the said Kannan Iyer.
4. In the considered opinion of this Court, no second FIR.,
can be registered for the same transaction. During the course of
investigation, if material surfaces about the involvement of said
accused, it is needless to state that the Police shall make them as
accused and take action in accordance with law.
cancel the patta
The petitioner claims ownership in respect of the lands
situated in Survey Nos.34/2, 35/13, 35/1, 35/8, 35/9 and 13/2
situated at Jagirmangalam Village, Thirvalangadu Firka, Tiruttani
Taluk, Thiruvallur District and the properties are ancestral in nature
and he is cultivating the lands. According to the petitioner by playing
fraud the 5th respondent managed to obtain a patta in his name and in
this regard, he has submitted an application to the 2nd respondent who
has called him for an enquiry vide memo dated 11.02.2010 and
according to the petitioner he has also attended the enquiry on
19.02.2010 and since, nothing had happened thereafter, came forward
to file this writ petition.
3. Heard the submissions of Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional
Government Pleader, who accepts notice for the respondents 1 to 4.
3
4. Though, the petitioner has prayed for a larger relief, this
Court in the facts and circumstances of the case, permits the
petitioner to submit one more representation to the 2nd respondent for
early disposal of his petition dated 04.02.2010 and referred to in the
summons vide Na.Ka.No.469/2010/A2 dated 11.02.2010 within a
period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order
and on receipt of the same, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider
the representation on merits and in accordance with law, after putting
the 5th respondent on notice and pass orders as expeditiously as
possible and not later than eight weeks, thereafter and inform the
decision taken to the petitioner as well as the 5th respondent.
Tamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery Industry
These writ petitions are filed for issue of a Writ of Mandamus
forbearing the respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants,
representatives and/or anyone claiming through or under them and/or any
other person from in any manner applying the impugned Government Order in
G.O.(2D) No. 59, Labour And Employment (J1) Department dated 10.10.2014
and published in Part II-Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette dated
03.12.2014 on the petitioners, who are differently placed as Hosiery
Manufactory and not as Tailoring Industry.
2. When the writ petitions are taken up, it is brought to the
notice of this Court that a Division Bench of this Court, in similar
circumstances, in W.P. Nos. 36077 & 36078 of 2015, on 17.01.2016, held as
follows:
"4. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents
fairly submits that the aforestated G.O.(2D) No. 59, Labour and
Employment (J1) Department dated 10.10.2014 is not applicable
to the employment in Hosiery Manufactory.
5. In view of the foregoings, it is established that G.O.
(2D) No. 59, Labour and Employment (J1) Department dated
10.10.2014, published in Part II Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu
4
Government Gazette dated 03.12.2014 is not applicable to the
employment in Hosiery Manufactory. Accordingly, these writ
petitions are disposed of. ..."
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
the petitioner has not given any representation to the
respondent and straightaway approached this Court, by filing this Writ
Petition, stating that this Court should direct the respondent to accept the
entire amount in 24 equal installments
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking to remove the allegation from an FIR that he was driving under the influence at the time of a car accident. The court denied the request, stating that the allegation is part of the complainant's version and subject to ongoing investigation. While the allegation alone does not prove drunken driving or prevent an insurance claim, it is not appropriate for the court to remove a statement that is being investigated. The petition was therefore closed without modifying the FIR.
Leshark
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated August 22, 2017 regarding relief under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995. However, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner issued a circular on March 26, 2018 addressing this issue. As the petitioner's representation had already been considered through this circular, the court determined no further adjudication was required. Therefore, the court closed the writ petition without any order for costs.
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
This document is a summary of a court case from the Madras High Court regarding the revision of minimum wage rates for employees in the tailoring industry in Tamil Nadu. The petitioners challenged the government order revising wages, arguing it violated principles of natural justice and procedures outlined in the Minimum Wages Act. The court examined arguments from both petitioners and the state government. It ultimately dismissed the petitions and allowed the government's appeal, upholding the revised minimum wage rates.
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
The Madras High Court heard a case between Tirupur South Rotary Nursery and Primer School and the Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner. The school sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider a representation dated April 23, 2015. However, in light of a previous order remanding a similar case, the court determined it was not necessary to issue the writ at this stage. The court closed the case but left it open for the school to pursue remedies after the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner issues an order per previous court directions.
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014
The Madras High Court heard a petition filed by S. Soundari seeking a direction to the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a report based on her complaint of abuse by her husband B. Suresh. The Court ordered B. Suresh to be impleaded as the second respondent. Considering this is a matrimonial issue, the Court directed the police to summon both parties to inquire into the matter and try to arrive at an amicable solution, while also dealing with it according to law. The petition was then disposed of on these terms.
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)
The Madras High Court heard a petition from S. Soundari seeking a direction for police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a report based on her complaint of abuse by her husband B. Suresh. The court ordered B. Suresh to be impleaded as the second respondent. Considering this is a matrimonial issue, the court directed police to summon both S. Soundari and B. Suresh to inquire into the matter and try to arrive at an amicable solution, dealing with it according to law. The petition was then disposed of on these terms.
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
The Madras High Court heard a case between Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd. and the Employees Provident Fund Organization. Royal Yarns filed a writ petition challenging proceedings initiated under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act, claiming they could not honor commitments on time but were ready to remit the entire amount in 24 equal installments. However, the Court said no direction could be issued to accept payment in 24 installments and directed Royal Yarns to submit a representation requesting payment in 10 equal installments, which the Employees Provident Fund Organization shall consider. The writ petition was then disposed of without costs.
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
The document discusses a writ petition regarding the installation of a statue of actor Sivaji Ganesan in Chennai, India. It provides background on the case, including that the government had announced plans to erect the statue but installed it in a different location than planned, raising disputes. The key issues debated are whether the statue's location violates an undertaking given to the Supreme Court regarding not allowing structures on public roads, and if it obstructs traffic flow. An earlier court order found the undertaking would apply to Chennai as well. The document analyzes these core issues and discusses arguments from both sides.
N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015
The petitioner claims ownership of certain lands that have been ancestral property and have been cultivated by the petitioner. However, the fifth respondent fraudulently obtained land pattas for the properties. The petitioner submitted an application to the second respondent for an inquiry, and attended the inquiry on the scheduled date. As there was no subsequent action, the petitioner filed this writ petition. The court allowed the petitioner to submit another representation to the second respondent within two weeks for expeditious disposal of the matter. The second respondent must consider the representation on merits after notice to the fifth respondent, and pass orders within eight weeks informing both parties of the decision.
List new2
The document discusses four writ petitions regarding the applicability of a government order (G.O.(2D) No.59) to employment in hosiery manufactories. It notes that an earlier order from the Division Bench of the Court held that the government order does not apply to such employment. Relying on this earlier order, the counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petitions can be disposed of. The Court directs the Registry to list all connected matters together for common disposal in light of the earlier order and grants an interim injunction in the meantime.
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court denied the request, noting that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age at marriage were not a fit case for a positive direction to the police. The court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court instead.
More from S.Ezhil Raj (20)
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
Recently uploaded
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Framework
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
在线办理(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations DemystifiedPROF. PAUL ALLIEU KAMARA
To ensure the integrity of financial systems and combat illicit financial activities, understanding AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance regulations is crucial for financial institutions and businesses. AML compliance regulations are designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities by imposing specific requirements on financial institutions, including customer due diligence, monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities (GitHub Docs).Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
原版定做(sheffield学位证书)英国谢菲尔德大学毕业证文凭证书原版一模一样
原版定制【微信:bwp0011】《(sheffield学位证书)英国谢菲尔德大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信:bwp0011】成绩单 、雅思、外壳、留信学历认证永久存档查询，采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信bwp0011】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信bwp0011】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
Recently uploaded (20)
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
- 1. Madras High Court Nethaji Transport Workers Union ... vs The Secretary on 17 February, 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.02.2016 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.5744/2016 Nethaji Transport Workers Union rep. by its State president V.Thalapathy .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Secretary Tamil Nadu Transport Department Secretariat, Namakkal Kavingnar Maligai Fort St George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Transport Commissioner Ezhilagam, Chennai 600 109. 3.The Managing Director Tamilnadu State Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan Illam, Pallavan Salai Chennai 600 002. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ezhil Raj For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.Rajeswaran, Spl.GP For R3 : Mr.P.Paramsivadoss ORDER Heard Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner ; learned Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader accepting notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 ; and Mr.P.Paramasivadoss, learned counsel accepting notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent and with their consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2 The petitioner is a Trade Union registered under the provisions of the Trade Union Act and they have sought for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider their representation dated 27.01.2016. 3 In the said representation, the petitioner Union has highlighted certain grievances about the GPS machine and it appears that they wanted to revert back to manual ticketing process. Prima facie the Nethaji Transport Workers Union ... vs The Secretary on 17 February, 2016 Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/71433231/ 1
- 2. case as projected by the petitioner / Union in the representation is not tenable since owing to the technological developments, new methods have to be adopted and GPS machines appear to have been time tested and it prevents various problems including shortage of cash etc. However, this being a policy decision, this Court cannot express any opinion on the same. It is open to the 3rd respondent to consider the said representation on merits and in accordance with law. 4 With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. 17.02.2016 AP To 1.The Secretary Tamil Nadu Transport Department Secretariat, Namakkal Kavingnar Maligai Fort St George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Transport Commissioner Ezhilagam, Chennai 600 109. 3.The Managing Director Tamilnadu State Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan Illam, Pallavan Salai Chennai 600 002. T.S.SIVAGNANAM.J, AP WP.No.5744/2016 17.02.2016 Nethaji Transport Workers Union ... vs The Secretary on 17 February, 2016 Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/71433231/ 2