G.ramachandran vs state_rep._by_on_30_october,_2015 (1)
•
0 likes•14 views
The petitioners filed a criminal original petition in the Madras High Court seeking an order directing the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report on their complaint alleging that three individuals (Sathyamurthy, Viswanathan, and Emanuel) were accomplices of Kannan Iyer, who had previously been charged in another case with forging bank customer signatures and defalcating funds. The High Court denied the request, noting that no second FIR can be registered for the same transaction, but that if evidence surfaces during the investigation implicating the three individuals, the police shall make them accused and take action accordingly. The petition was then closed.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
FIR Direction
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to
direct the respondent to register FIR, investigate and file a final
report on the complaint dated 12.08.2015 given by the petitioner.
2
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
3. On a complaint lodged by one Ramachandran (the first
petitioner herein), a case in Crime No.21 of 2014 has been
registered by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,
Tiruvallulur, against Kannan Iyer (A1), who was working as
Manager in Central Bank of India, Pattaraiperumbudur Branch. The
allegation against the accused is that, he has forged the signature
of Bank customers and had defalcated the amounts. Now these
petitioners have given a complaint dated 12.08.2015 against one
Sathyamurthy, Viswanathan and Emanuel, whom the petitioners
alleged were accomplices of the said Kannan Iyer.
4. In the considered opinion of this Court, no second FIR.,
can be registered for the same transaction. During the course of
investigation, if material surfaces about the involvement of said
accused, it is needless to state that the Police shall make them as
accused and take action in accordance with law.
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SC
Order of CIC is self explanatory as to how Central Registry of CIC is persisting criminal conspiracy against the Appellant and protecting the bad elements State Apparatus
Gujrat HC on custodial torture.pdf
1. The court ordered an inquiry into the arrest of four petitioners by police authorities in Gujarat, as the court believes this was a case of extreme excess and the petitioners appear to be victims due to their birth in a particular community.
2. While independent witnesses said the petitioners earned an honest living, police implicated them in around 5 cases based only on their confessions obtained through torture. The petitioners were acquitted in all cases by trial courts.
3. The court ordered the Inspector General of Police to conduct an inquiry and submit an affidavit regarding any excess committed by police in arresting and implicating the petitioners. The court will then decide on action against police officers and compensation for the petition
Madras hc march 1 order
This order summarizes a criminal case in the Madras High Court. The petitioner, S. Devika, filed a criminal original petition to quash proceedings against her in case C.C.No.760 of 2020 before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate's Court in Saidapet, Chennai. The High Court allowed the petition, noting that no offense had been made out against the petitioner based on precedents. It also noted that the government had decided to withdraw all cases registered against those protesting the Citizenship Amendment Act. Therefore, the High Court quashed the proceedings in case C.C.No.760 of 2020, as continuing it would serve no useful purpose.
Judgement dated 170415
1. The petitioner filed two criminal petitions seeking transfer of investigation into her complaints to other agencies like the Vigilance department or CBI, alleging a perfunctory investigation by the police.
2. The police counter stated that they summoned the petitioner and others for inquiry but the petitioner did not cooperate or provide documents. The inquiry found that work was awarded to a contractor through proper tender process, not the petitioner.
3. The court dismissed the petitions, saying the complaints were an attempt to avoid disciplinary action for irregularities. It imposed a fine on the petitioner for filing frivolous petitions.
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation of a case involving the collection of around Rs. 300 crores in deposits by a company to the CBI. The court noted that the case is currently being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing and that the investigation is progressing well with movable properties seized and 19 immovable properties identified based on confession statements. While there is usually a demand for CBI investigation, transferring the case now would adversely affect the ongoing investigation. The court thus denied the petitioner's request and hopes the Economic Offences Wing will attach properties and file a charge sheet swiftly.
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petition sought a writ of mandamus to transfer a case being investigated by the local police to the CBI for a fair investigation, citing lack of progress and credibility issues. The court noted the usual argument put forth by the CBI about lack of resources but felt a premier agency like the CBI should investigate sensitive cases impartially. However, the local police had made some progress by attaching properties and arresting accused, and were continuing their investigation. The court sought a status update from the police on the investigation.
In_The_High_Court_Of_Judicature_At_..._vs_State_Rep._By_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court determined that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age and the marriage broker arranging the marriage were not appropriate for a court direction to the police. Instead, the court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court.
Recommended
FIR Direction
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to
direct the respondent to register FIR, investigate and file a final
report on the complaint dated 12.08.2015 given by the petitioner.
2
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
3. On a complaint lodged by one Ramachandran (the first
petitioner herein), a case in Crime No.21 of 2014 has been
registered by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,
Tiruvallulur, against Kannan Iyer (A1), who was working as
Manager in Central Bank of India, Pattaraiperumbudur Branch. The
allegation against the accused is that, he has forged the signature
of Bank customers and had defalcated the amounts. Now these
petitioners have given a complaint dated 12.08.2015 against one
Sathyamurthy, Viswanathan and Emanuel, whom the petitioners
alleged were accomplices of the said Kannan Iyer.
4. In the considered opinion of this Court, no second FIR.,
can be registered for the same transaction. During the course of
investigation, if material surfaces about the involvement of said
accused, it is needless to state that the Police shall make them as
accused and take action in accordance with law.
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SC
Order of CIC is self explanatory as to how Central Registry of CIC is persisting criminal conspiracy against the Appellant and protecting the bad elements State Apparatus
Gujrat HC on custodial torture.pdf
1. The court ordered an inquiry into the arrest of four petitioners by police authorities in Gujarat, as the court believes this was a case of extreme excess and the petitioners appear to be victims due to their birth in a particular community.
2. While independent witnesses said the petitioners earned an honest living, police implicated them in around 5 cases based only on their confessions obtained through torture. The petitioners were acquitted in all cases by trial courts.
3. The court ordered the Inspector General of Police to conduct an inquiry and submit an affidavit regarding any excess committed by police in arresting and implicating the petitioners. The court will then decide on action against police officers and compensation for the petition
Madras hc march 1 order
This order summarizes a criminal case in the Madras High Court. The petitioner, S. Devika, filed a criminal original petition to quash proceedings against her in case C.C.No.760 of 2020 before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate's Court in Saidapet, Chennai. The High Court allowed the petition, noting that no offense had been made out against the petitioner based on precedents. It also noted that the government had decided to withdraw all cases registered against those protesting the Citizenship Amendment Act. Therefore, the High Court quashed the proceedings in case C.C.No.760 of 2020, as continuing it would serve no useful purpose.
Judgement dated 170415
1. The petitioner filed two criminal petitions seeking transfer of investigation into her complaints to other agencies like the Vigilance department or CBI, alleging a perfunctory investigation by the police.
2. The police counter stated that they summoned the petitioner and others for inquiry but the petitioner did not cooperate or provide documents. The inquiry found that work was awarded to a contractor through proper tender process, not the petitioner.
3. The court dismissed the petitions, saying the complaints were an attempt to avoid disciplinary action for irregularities. It imposed a fine on the petitioner for filing frivolous petitions.
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation of a case involving the collection of around Rs. 300 crores in deposits by a company to the CBI. The court noted that the case is currently being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing and that the investigation is progressing well with movable properties seized and 19 immovable properties identified based on confession statements. While there is usually a demand for CBI investigation, transferring the case now would adversely affect the ongoing investigation. The court thus denied the petitioner's request and hopes the Economic Offences Wing will attach properties and file a charge sheet swiftly.
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petition sought a writ of mandamus to transfer a case being investigated by the local police to the CBI for a fair investigation, citing lack of progress and credibility issues. The court noted the usual argument put forth by the CBI about lack of resources but felt a premier agency like the CBI should investigate sensitive cases impartially. However, the local police had made some progress by attaching properties and arresting accused, and were continuing their investigation. The court sought a status update from the police on the investigation.
In_The_High_Court_Of_Judicature_At_..._vs_State_Rep._By_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court determined that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age and the marriage broker arranging the marriage were not appropriate for a court direction to the police. Instead, the court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court.
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court denied the request, noting that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age at marriage were not a fit case for a positive direction to the police. The court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court instead.
Rajnikanth periyar order
1. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 156(3) of the CrPC seeking direction to register an FIR against actor Rajinikanth for allegedly making false and inflammatory statements about Dravidian ideologists including Periyar at an event.
2. The court examined the speech and found it was at best defamatory in nature regarding an alleged past event, and did not encourage unlawful behavior.
3. As the offenses of 153A, 504 and 505 IPC were not made out, the petition was dismissed while allowing the petitioner to pursue a private defamation complaint under Sections 499/500 IPC if so advised.
Bombay High Court - Judgement on Aseem Trivedi, Sedition Case
This document is a judgment from the Bombay High Court regarding a Public Interest Litigation filed in response to the arrest of political cartoonist Assem Trivedi under charges of sedition for cartoons he published. The court summarizes the events, including Trivedi's arrest and release on bail under a previous court order. It also discusses the legal positions around freedom of speech under the Constitution and the sedition law. While the sedition charges against Trivedi have been dropped, the court examines the legal issues around invoking sedition to determine if and when such charges could infringe upon constitutional rights.
6002
This document is a memorandum filed with the High Court of Madras regarding criminal cases and petitions. It summarizes several criminal cases and complaints filed by the petitioner against various government officials and departments. It requests the court to direct the respondents to submit reports and records regarding the cases, and to take necessary action against the accused officials to recover losses and prevent them from escaping punishment. It provides details of several FIRs filed, departmental investigations conducted, and complaints submitted by the petitioner to various authorities over allegations of corruption and misconduct.
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
The document appears to be a memorandum submitted to the High Court of Judicature at Madras regarding a criminal original petition. It summarizes objections to a counter filed by the 8th respondent (Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department, Cuddalore). It denies statements made in the counter and argues the case involves corruption and loss of government funds that were not properly recovered or investigated against multiple officials and contractors across three districts. It requests the court to direct a full investigation and recovery of lost funds. The memorandum is submitted along with additional documents in support of the petitioners arguments against the 8th respondent's counter.
Brinda karat and anr. v. state and anr. (defects cleared)
The petitioners have challenged an order passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dismissing their application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC seeking investigation and registration of an FIR for alleged hate speech by two Members of Parliament. The Magistrate held that prior sanction under Section 196 CrPC was required at this initial stage, which was not obtained. The petitioners argue that sanction is only required at the stage of cognizance, not investigation under Section 156(3). They further argue that the cases relied upon by the Magistrate are distinguishable and that requiring sanction at this stage would hamper access to justice. The petitioners seek quashing of the impugned order and issuance of directions.
Sanji ram v state
The petitioner, Sanji Ram, sought parole for 8 weeks to attend his son's marriage. However, the court denied his request. According to a police report, the victim's relatives had returned to the village where the marriage was to take place. There were concerns that granting parole could lead to community clashes and protests in Jammu and Kashmir given the apprehensions around the case. As a result, the court dismissed the petition due to the genuine law and order concerns expressed by releasing the petitioner.
E.mohanammal
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
Bail order issued of Bikram Majithia-
This document summarizes a court case involving an application by Bikram Singh Majithia seeking regular bail. It provides background on previous FIRs registered against Majithia related to drug trafficking. It describes a 2018 report by the Special Task Force alleging Majithia's involvement with drug traffickers based on their statements. Shortly before 2022 state elections, a new FIR was registered against Majithia based on the 2018 report. Majithia surrendered after applications for anticipatory bail were dismissed. He now seeks regular bail, arguing political vendetta, while the state refutes this and says the new FIR investigates new allegations not covered by previous cases.
Argument in Writ Petition (Criminal) 42 of 2023 before SC .pdf
1. The document lists dates and events related to a case involving kidnapping, gang rape, human trafficking, and sexual abuse of the petitioner's family members by sex racketeers in Bihar and Delhi since 2005.
2. It describes the petitioner's wife being kidnapped in 2005, the death of his father in 2007 and mother in 2017, and several attacks on the petitioner and his family by the accused.
3. It also lists the petitioner's numerous complaints to police and courts, and the dismissal of his writ petitions by the Supreme Court regarding the case.
Final status of PRSEC/E/2018/18152 dated 09.10.2018
The complainant filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition that the Supreme Court registry raised defects against, including objectionable remarks, and though the complainant responded the registry is now not responding to inquiries about the petition's status. The complainant is seeking a response from the registry on whether the Criminal Appeal will be registered or what action has been taken, and included copies of correspondence regarding curing defects for the President's Secretariat to take appropriate action.
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
Delhi hc judgment dalit man
1. The appellant, who belongs to a scheduled caste, filed a complaint alleging he experienced caste-based abuse and humiliation by influential individuals over two years, including being pushed off a horse.
2. He alleges the accused conspired in a WhatsApp group to conduct an acid attack and frame his trainer, but one member left after informing the trainer of the plot.
3. The appellant says the police refused to register his complaints and the courts granted long dates, dismissing his applications, leaving him in danger from the accused persons.
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
This document summarizes a court case in Mumbai, India involving 10 individuals from Indonesia who were charged with violating lockdown orders issued due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The prosecution presented evidence from two witnesses, police officers who discovered the individuals at a local mosque on April 5, 2020, allegedly in violation of restrictions. The defense disputed the evidence and cited other court rulings that discharged defendants in similar cases. The judge considered the arguments from both sides to determine if the prosecution had sufficiently proven their case.
Madras hc jan 21 order
1) The petitioner, M. Ananthan, was arrested in 2018 for drug offenses involving commercial quantities of ganja and has been in judicial custody since.
2) While the petitioner satisfies one requirement for bail under the NDPS Act by not having a criminal record, the court found he did not satisfy the second requirement that he is not likely to have committed the offense based on evidence.
3) However, the court determined the petitioner's right to a speedy trial had been violated as the trial had not commenced for over two years. As such, the court directed the prosecution to pay compensation of Rs. 1 lakh and for the trial to conclude within three months.
Bom hc compensation judgement dec 1
1. The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking Rs. 5 lakh compensation each, claiming they were illegally arrested and detained by police for 6 days in a criminal case.
2. Police registered an FIR for assault against the petitioners based on a complaint. The petitioners were arrested on the day the FIR was registered despite it being a bailable offense.
3. The petitioners were released on bail by a magistrate but rearrested and produced before an executive magistrate who ordered interim bonds, resulting in the petitioners' detention for 6 days until bonds could be furnished. The petitioners argued this was illegal.
Rs bharathi order
This order denies a petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings against the petitioner. The petitioner, a political leader, was charged for offenses under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for remarks made during a political event. While the petitioner argued the remarks were not intended to disrespect judges or members of scheduled castes, the court found the remarks prima facie showed he remarked that people outside of Tamil Nadu are idiots and no one from scheduled castes had become a high court judge in another state until certain political leaders intervened. The court held it is not justified to embark on an inquiry into the reliability of allegations at this stage, and the petitioner must face trial based
Madras hc madurai bench order
This document is a court order from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court regarding a writ petition filed by the petitioner Santhosh. The petitioner's younger brother Ramesh was taken into police custody and found dead the next day, with the police claiming it was suicide. The petitioner alleged Ramesh was tortured by police and died as a result. The court ordered a second autopsy, which was conducted. The court then directed that the investigation be transferred from the local police to the CBCID due to allegations against the local police. The court also issued directions for strict compliance in cases of custodial deaths, such as requiring video recording of full autopsies adhering to established forensic standards.
Internship Report/Case Diary- Central University Of Kashmir.pdf
"JUSTICE DELIVERY SYSTEM UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR POST THE ABROGATION OF ARTICLE 370 OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION"
Sc order on hathras pil 27.10.2020
The Supreme Court heard multiple petitions and intervention applications related to the alleged gang rape and death of a 19-year old Dalit woman in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh. The petitions sought orders for a fair investigation by an independent agency like the CBI, formation of an SIT, protection for witnesses and victim's family, and transfer of trial outside Uttar Pradesh. The Court noted that the High Court was already seized of the matter. However, it addressed concerns around protection and security for the victim's family based on an affidavit filed by the Uttar Pradesh government detailing security arrangements that had been put in place.
Drt g.selvam
The petitioner, a borrower with a pending application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal in Coimbatore, sought an order prohibiting the respondent from taking property possession. The court noted a presiding officer was available to handle the case. While not interfering with the Tribunal's functions, the court directed it to dispose of the pending application within 8 weeks. The order stated any consequential possession actions would be subject to the Tribunal's ruling. The writ petition was then disposed of without costs.
Drt victory knit fashions
The petitioner, a borrower of the respondent bank, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent the bank from taking further action or possession based on a sale in September 2019 until an appeal was filed and disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal in Coimbatore. While the petitioner had agreed to hand over possession by September 7th, they also filed an application challenging the bank's order under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. The court directed the tribunal to number the application and consider it within two weeks, and maintain the status quo until then.
More Related Content
Similar to G.ramachandran vs state_rep._by_on_30_october,_2015 (1)
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court denied the request, noting that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age at marriage were not a fit case for a positive direction to the police. The court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court instead.
Rajnikanth periyar order
1. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 156(3) of the CrPC seeking direction to register an FIR against actor Rajinikanth for allegedly making false and inflammatory statements about Dravidian ideologists including Periyar at an event.
2. The court examined the speech and found it was at best defamatory in nature regarding an alleged past event, and did not encourage unlawful behavior.
3. As the offenses of 153A, 504 and 505 IPC were not made out, the petition was dismissed while allowing the petitioner to pursue a private defamation complaint under Sections 499/500 IPC if so advised.
Bombay High Court - Judgement on Aseem Trivedi, Sedition Case
This document is a judgment from the Bombay High Court regarding a Public Interest Litigation filed in response to the arrest of political cartoonist Assem Trivedi under charges of sedition for cartoons he published. The court summarizes the events, including Trivedi's arrest and release on bail under a previous court order. It also discusses the legal positions around freedom of speech under the Constitution and the sedition law. While the sedition charges against Trivedi have been dropped, the court examines the legal issues around invoking sedition to determine if and when such charges could infringe upon constitutional rights.
6002
This document is a memorandum filed with the High Court of Madras regarding criminal cases and petitions. It summarizes several criminal cases and complaints filed by the petitioner against various government officials and departments. It requests the court to direct the respondents to submit reports and records regarding the cases, and to take necessary action against the accused officials to recover losses and prevent them from escaping punishment. It provides details of several FIRs filed, departmental investigations conducted, and complaints submitted by the petitioner to various authorities over allegations of corruption and misconduct.
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
The document appears to be a memorandum submitted to the High Court of Judicature at Madras regarding a criminal original petition. It summarizes objections to a counter filed by the 8th respondent (Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department, Cuddalore). It denies statements made in the counter and argues the case involves corruption and loss of government funds that were not properly recovered or investigated against multiple officials and contractors across three districts. It requests the court to direct a full investigation and recovery of lost funds. The memorandum is submitted along with additional documents in support of the petitioners arguments against the 8th respondent's counter.
Brinda karat and anr. v. state and anr. (defects cleared)
The petitioners have challenged an order passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dismissing their application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC seeking investigation and registration of an FIR for alleged hate speech by two Members of Parliament. The Magistrate held that prior sanction under Section 196 CrPC was required at this initial stage, which was not obtained. The petitioners argue that sanction is only required at the stage of cognizance, not investigation under Section 156(3). They further argue that the cases relied upon by the Magistrate are distinguishable and that requiring sanction at this stage would hamper access to justice. The petitioners seek quashing of the impugned order and issuance of directions.
Sanji ram v state
The petitioner, Sanji Ram, sought parole for 8 weeks to attend his son's marriage. However, the court denied his request. According to a police report, the victim's relatives had returned to the village where the marriage was to take place. There were concerns that granting parole could lead to community clashes and protests in Jammu and Kashmir given the apprehensions around the case. As a result, the court dismissed the petition due to the genuine law and order concerns expressed by releasing the petitioner.
E.mohanammal
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
Bail order issued of Bikram Majithia-
This document summarizes a court case involving an application by Bikram Singh Majithia seeking regular bail. It provides background on previous FIRs registered against Majithia related to drug trafficking. It describes a 2018 report by the Special Task Force alleging Majithia's involvement with drug traffickers based on their statements. Shortly before 2022 state elections, a new FIR was registered against Majithia based on the 2018 report. Majithia surrendered after applications for anticipatory bail were dismissed. He now seeks regular bail, arguing political vendetta, while the state refutes this and says the new FIR investigates new allegations not covered by previous cases.
Argument in Writ Petition (Criminal) 42 of 2023 before SC .pdf
1. The document lists dates and events related to a case involving kidnapping, gang rape, human trafficking, and sexual abuse of the petitioner's family members by sex racketeers in Bihar and Delhi since 2005.
2. It describes the petitioner's wife being kidnapped in 2005, the death of his father in 2007 and mother in 2017, and several attacks on the petitioner and his family by the accused.
3. It also lists the petitioner's numerous complaints to police and courts, and the dismissal of his writ petitions by the Supreme Court regarding the case.
Final status of PRSEC/E/2018/18152 dated 09.10.2018
The complainant filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition that the Supreme Court registry raised defects against, including objectionable remarks, and though the complainant responded the registry is now not responding to inquiries about the petition's status. The complainant is seeking a response from the registry on whether the Criminal Appeal will be registered or what action has been taken, and included copies of correspondence regarding curing defects for the President's Secretariat to take appropriate action.
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
Delhi hc judgment dalit man
1. The appellant, who belongs to a scheduled caste, filed a complaint alleging he experienced caste-based abuse and humiliation by influential individuals over two years, including being pushed off a horse.
2. He alleges the accused conspired in a WhatsApp group to conduct an acid attack and frame his trainer, but one member left after informing the trainer of the plot.
3. The appellant says the police refused to register his complaints and the courts granted long dates, dismissing his applications, leaving him in danger from the accused persons.
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
This document summarizes a court case in Mumbai, India involving 10 individuals from Indonesia who were charged with violating lockdown orders issued due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The prosecution presented evidence from two witnesses, police officers who discovered the individuals at a local mosque on April 5, 2020, allegedly in violation of restrictions. The defense disputed the evidence and cited other court rulings that discharged defendants in similar cases. The judge considered the arguments from both sides to determine if the prosecution had sufficiently proven their case.
Madras hc jan 21 order
1) The petitioner, M. Ananthan, was arrested in 2018 for drug offenses involving commercial quantities of ganja and has been in judicial custody since.
2) While the petitioner satisfies one requirement for bail under the NDPS Act by not having a criminal record, the court found he did not satisfy the second requirement that he is not likely to have committed the offense based on evidence.
3) However, the court determined the petitioner's right to a speedy trial had been violated as the trial had not commenced for over two years. As such, the court directed the prosecution to pay compensation of Rs. 1 lakh and for the trial to conclude within three months.
Bom hc compensation judgement dec 1
1. The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking Rs. 5 lakh compensation each, claiming they were illegally arrested and detained by police for 6 days in a criminal case.
2. Police registered an FIR for assault against the petitioners based on a complaint. The petitioners were arrested on the day the FIR was registered despite it being a bailable offense.
3. The petitioners were released on bail by a magistrate but rearrested and produced before an executive magistrate who ordered interim bonds, resulting in the petitioners' detention for 6 days until bonds could be furnished. The petitioners argued this was illegal.
Rs bharathi order
This order denies a petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings against the petitioner. The petitioner, a political leader, was charged for offenses under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for remarks made during a political event. While the petitioner argued the remarks were not intended to disrespect judges or members of scheduled castes, the court found the remarks prima facie showed he remarked that people outside of Tamil Nadu are idiots and no one from scheduled castes had become a high court judge in another state until certain political leaders intervened. The court held it is not justified to embark on an inquiry into the reliability of allegations at this stage, and the petitioner must face trial based
Madras hc madurai bench order
This document is a court order from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court regarding a writ petition filed by the petitioner Santhosh. The petitioner's younger brother Ramesh was taken into police custody and found dead the next day, with the police claiming it was suicide. The petitioner alleged Ramesh was tortured by police and died as a result. The court ordered a second autopsy, which was conducted. The court then directed that the investigation be transferred from the local police to the CBCID due to allegations against the local police. The court also issued directions for strict compliance in cases of custodial deaths, such as requiring video recording of full autopsies adhering to established forensic standards.
Internship Report/Case Diary- Central University Of Kashmir.pdf
"JUSTICE DELIVERY SYSTEM UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR POST THE ABROGATION OF ARTICLE 370 OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION"
Sc order on hathras pil 27.10.2020
The Supreme Court heard multiple petitions and intervention applications related to the alleged gang rape and death of a 19-year old Dalit woman in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh. The petitions sought orders for a fair investigation by an independent agency like the CBI, formation of an SIT, protection for witnesses and victim's family, and transfer of trial outside Uttar Pradesh. The Court noted that the High Court was already seized of the matter. However, it addressed concerns around protection and security for the victim's family based on an affidavit filed by the Uttar Pradesh government detailing security arrangements that had been put in place.
Similar to G.ramachandran vs state_rep._by_on_30_october,_2015 (1) (20)
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
Bombay High Court - Judgement on Aseem Trivedi, Sedition Case
Bombay High Court - Judgement on Aseem Trivedi, Sedition Case
Brinda karat and anr. v. state and anr. (defects cleared)
Brinda karat and anr. v. state and anr. (defects cleared)
Argument in Writ Petition (Criminal) 42 of 2023 before SC .pdf
Argument in Writ Petition (Criminal) 42 of 2023 before SC .pdf
Final status of PRSEC/E/2018/18152 dated 09.10.2018
Final status of PRSEC/E/2018/18152 dated 09.10.2018
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
Internship Report/Case Diary- Central University Of Kashmir.pdf
Internship Report/Case Diary- Central University Of Kashmir.pdf
More from S.Ezhil Raj
Drt g.selvam
The petitioner, a borrower with a pending application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal in Coimbatore, sought an order prohibiting the respondent from taking property possession. The court noted a presiding officer was available to handle the case. While not interfering with the Tribunal's functions, the court directed it to dispose of the pending application within 8 weeks. The order stated any consequential possession actions would be subject to the Tribunal's ruling. The writ petition was then disposed of without costs.
Drt victory knit fashions
The petitioner, a borrower of the respondent bank, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent the bank from taking further action or possession based on a sale in September 2019 until an appeal was filed and disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal in Coimbatore. While the petitioner had agreed to hand over possession by September 7th, they also filed an application challenging the bank's order under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act. The court directed the tribunal to number the application and consider it within two weeks, and maintain the status quo until then.
Thenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangam
The petitioner, an association of marriage brokers, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider their representation dated April 20, 2020. In their representation, the association sought monetary relief for its member brokers who had become jobless due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The court directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within six weeks and pass orders on its merits in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly without costs.
ORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMEN
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the High Court of Madras seeking to quash the charges framed against him in session case no. 128 of 2017 before the Fast Track Mahila Court in Tiruppur. The prosecution argued that there were specific allegations against the petitioner to attract the offenses of abetment of suicide and cruelty by husband or relatives under sections 306 and 498A of IPC. While the petitioner claimed to be innocent, the High Court held that the trial court had applied its judicial mind properly and found a prima facie case against the petitioner based on the materials on record. Referring to a previous judgment, the High Court dismissed the petition, noting that the correctness of the allegations must be decided during trial
BAIL APPLICATION
The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard a criminal revision case regarding a bounced cheque. The petitioner had issued a cheque for Rs. 39,507 to the respondent for food purchases that bounced. The lower courts had convicted the petitioner, but a settlement was reached during the High Court hearing. The parties filed to compound the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Noting this and that the offense was compoundable, the High Court allowed compounding, set aside the conviction, and acquitted the petitioner per Section 320(8) of the CrPC.
Tambaram municipality
The petitioner filed a writ petition against the Tambaram Municipality Commissioner (1st respondent) seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the commissioner to take further action pursuant to a notice issued regarding an unauthorized construction. The municipality stated in its counter that it found no unauthorized construction after inspection other than a fertility clinic operation. The municipality also prepared a note to withdraw the original notice. Considering the municipality's submission and noting that the petitioner did not object, the court closed the writ petition and the related miscellaneous petition.
Sapthagiri transport order
The petitioner challenged an order from the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court that admitted the petitioner's appeal of an assessment by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner subject to depositing 75% of the disputed amount. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's conditional order, noting that 75% deposit is required by law for appeals and found no reason to interfere with the Tribunal not waiving the deposit despite the petitioner's financial difficulties. The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order.
Land Dispute
The Purchaser purchased Ground Floor alone and while purchasing Ground Floor the Seller agreed not to construct Second Floor. But the First Floor Purchaser, planned to construct Second Floor and the Ground Floor Purchaser success before the Court
cancel the patta
The petitioner claims ownership in respect of the lands
situated in Survey Nos.34/2, 35/13, 35/1, 35/8, 35/9 and 13/2
situated at Jagirmangalam Village, Thirvalangadu Firka, Tiruttani
Taluk, Thiruvallur District and the properties are ancestral in nature
and he is cultivating the lands. According to the petitioner by playing
fraud the 5th respondent managed to obtain a patta in his name and in
this regard, he has submitted an application to the 2nd respondent who
has called him for an enquiry vide memo dated 11.02.2010 and
according to the petitioner he has also attended the enquiry on
19.02.2010 and since, nothing had happened thereafter, came forward
to file this writ petition.
3. Heard the submissions of Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional
Government Pleader, who accepts notice for the respondents 1 to 4.
3
4. Though, the petitioner has prayed for a larger relief, this
Court in the facts and circumstances of the case, permits the
petitioner to submit one more representation to the 2nd respondent for
early disposal of his petition dated 04.02.2010 and referred to in the
summons vide Na.Ka.No.469/2010/A2 dated 11.02.2010 within a
period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order
and on receipt of the same, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider
the representation on merits and in accordance with law, after putting
the 5th respondent on notice and pass orders as expeditiously as
possible and not later than eight weeks, thereafter and inform the
decision taken to the petitioner as well as the 5th respondent.
Tamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery Industry
These writ petitions are filed for issue of a Writ of Mandamus
forbearing the respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants,
representatives and/or anyone claiming through or under them and/or any
other person from in any manner applying the impugned Government Order in
G.O.(2D) No. 59, Labour And Employment (J1) Department dated 10.10.2014
and published in Part II-Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette dated
03.12.2014 on the petitioners, who are differently placed as Hosiery
Manufactory and not as Tailoring Industry.
2. When the writ petitions are taken up, it is brought to the
notice of this Court that a Division Bench of this Court, in similar
circumstances, in W.P. Nos. 36077 & 36078 of 2015, on 17.01.2016, held as
follows:
"4. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents
fairly submits that the aforestated G.O.(2D) No. 59, Labour and
Employment (J1) Department dated 10.10.2014 is not applicable
to the employment in Hosiery Manufactory.
5. In view of the foregoings, it is established that G.O.
(2D) No. 59, Labour and Employment (J1) Department dated
10.10.2014, published in Part II Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu
4
Government Gazette dated 03.12.2014 is not applicable to the
employment in Hosiery Manufactory. Accordingly, these writ
petitions are disposed of. ..."
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
the petitioner has not given any representation to the
respondent and straightaway approached this Court, by filing this Writ
Petition, stating that this Court should direct the respondent to accept the
entire amount in 24 equal installments
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking to remove the allegation from an FIR that he was driving under the influence at the time of a car accident. The court denied the request, stating that the allegation is part of the complainant's version and subject to ongoing investigation. While the allegation alone does not prove drunken driving or prevent an insurance claim, it is not appropriate for the court to remove a statement that is being investigated. The petition was therefore closed without modifying the FIR.
Leshark
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated August 22, 2017 regarding relief under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995. However, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner issued a circular on March 26, 2018 addressing this issue. As the petitioner's representation had already been considered through this circular, the court determined no further adjudication was required. Therefore, the court closed the writ petition without any order for costs.
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
This document is a summary of a court case from the Madras High Court regarding the revision of minimum wage rates for employees in the tailoring industry in Tamil Nadu. The petitioners challenged the government order revising wages, arguing it violated principles of natural justice and procedures outlined in the Minimum Wages Act. The court examined arguments from both petitioners and the state government. It ultimately dismissed the petitions and allowed the government's appeal, upholding the revised minimum wage rates.
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
The Madras High Court heard a case between Tirupur South Rotary Nursery and Primer School and the Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner. The school sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider a representation dated April 23, 2015. However, in light of a previous order remanding a similar case, the court determined it was not necessary to issue the writ at this stage. The court closed the case but left it open for the school to pursue remedies after the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner issues an order per previous court directions.
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014
The Madras High Court heard a petition filed by S. Soundari seeking a direction to the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a report based on her complaint of abuse by her husband B. Suresh. The Court ordered B. Suresh to be impleaded as the second respondent. Considering this is a matrimonial issue, the Court directed the police to summon both parties to inquire into the matter and try to arrive at an amicable solution, while also dealing with it according to law. The petition was then disposed of on these terms.
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)
The Madras High Court heard a petition from S. Soundari seeking a direction for police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a report based on her complaint of abuse by her husband B. Suresh. The court ordered B. Suresh to be impleaded as the second respondent. Considering this is a matrimonial issue, the court directed police to summon both S. Soundari and B. Suresh to inquire into the matter and try to arrive at an amicable solution, dealing with it according to law. The petition was then disposed of on these terms.
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
The Madras High Court heard a case between Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd. and the Employees Provident Fund Organization. Royal Yarns filed a writ petition challenging proceedings initiated under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act, claiming they could not honor commitments on time but were ready to remit the entire amount in 24 equal installments. However, the Court said no direction could be issued to accept payment in 24 installments and directed Royal Yarns to submit a representation requesting payment in 10 equal installments, which the Employees Provident Fund Organization shall consider. The writ petition was then disposed of without costs.
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
The document discusses a writ petition regarding the installation of a statue of actor Sivaji Ganesan in Chennai, India. It provides background on the case, including that the government had announced plans to erect the statue but installed it in a different location than planned, raising disputes. The key issues debated are whether the statue's location violates an undertaking given to the Supreme Court regarding not allowing structures on public roads, and if it obstructs traffic flow. An earlier court order found the undertaking would apply to Chennai as well. The document analyzes these core issues and discusses arguments from both sides.
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
The Nethaji Transport Workers Union filed a writ petition against the Secretary of the Tamil Nadu Transport Department, the Transport Commissioner, and the Managing Director of the Tamilnadu State Metropolitan Transport Corporation. The union sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider their representation dated January 27, 2016 regarding grievances about GPS machines and their desire to revert to manual ticketing. The court noted that adopting new technologies like GPS machines is necessary due to developments and that GPS prevents problems, but dismissed the petition since policy decisions are not for the court to opine on, directing the third respondent to consider the representation on its merits according to law.
More from S.Ezhil Raj (20)
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
Recently uploaded
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
2024 Idaho Water Users Association, Sun Valley, Idaho - June 11, 2024. Presented by Payton Hampton and Garrett Kitamura
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
Recently uploaded (20)
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
G.ramachandran vs state_rep._by_on_30_october,_2015 (1)
- 1. Madras High Court G.Ramachandran vs State Rep. By on 30 October, 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.10.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.OP No.24376 of 2015 1.G.Ramachandran 2.D.Kumari 3.Illayaraja 4.M.Mohan 5.T.Kellivazhavan .. Petitioners Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, B2, Pattaraiperumbudur, Kadambathur (via) Tiruvallur Taluk 631 203. .. Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to direct the resp For Petitioners :Mr.S.Ezhil Raj For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to direct the respondent to register FIR, investigate and file a final report on the complaint dated 12.08.2015 given by the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 3. On a complaint lodged by one Ramachandran (the first petitioner herein), a case in Crime No.21 of 2014 has been registered by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvallulur, against Kannan Iyer (A1), who was working as Manager in Central Bank of India, Pattaraiperumbudur Branch. The allegation against the accused is that, he has forged the signature of Bank customers and had defalcated the amounts. Now these petitioners have given a complaint dated 12.08.2015 against one Sathyamurthy, Viswanathan and Emanuel, whom the petitioners alleged were accomplices of the said Kannan Iyer. 4. In the considered opinion of this Court, no second FIR., can be registered for the same transaction. During the course of investigation, if material surfaces about the involvement of said accused, it is needless to state that the Police shall make them as accused and take action in G.Ramachandran vs State Rep. By on 30 October, 2015 Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/128423417/ 1
- 2. accordance with law. 5. With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. 30.10.2015 ds Note : Registry is directed to mark a copy of the order to the District Crime Branch, Tiruvallur. To: 1.The Inspector of Police, B2, Pattaraiperumbudur, Kadambathur (via) Tiruvallur Taluk 631 203. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. P.N.PRAKASH,J ds Crl.OP No.24376 of 2015 30.10.2015 G.Ramachandran vs State Rep. By on 30 October, 2015 Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/128423417/ 2