SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
Madras High Court
Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 4 March, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 04.03.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.8083 of 2016 &
WMP No.7197 of 2016
Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd.,
Rep. by its Director - Mr.B.Balusamy,
No.04/32, Seventh Cross Street,
College Road, Tirupur,
Tamil Nadu-641 602. .. Petitioner
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Organization,
Rep. by its Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
Dr.Balasundaram Road,
Coimbatore-641 018. .. Respondent
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ezhil Raj
O R D E R
Heard Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the Proceedings initiated under Section
7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952.
3. The petitioner would state that due to certain unavoidable circumstances, they could not honor
the commitment in time and they are ready to remit the entire amount in 24 equal installments.
However, it appears that the petitioner has not given any representation to the respondent and
straightaway approached this Court, by filing this Writ Petition, stating that this Court should direct
the respondent to accept the entire amount in 24 equal installments. In this regard, the learned
counsel for the petitioner referred to an earlier order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2024 of 2015,
dated 29.01.2015, (M/s.Tirupur Sri Sentil Cotton Mills Limited Vs. The Assistant Provident Fund
Commissioner, Coimbatore). In the said Writ Petition, the respondent took a stand that the
Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 4 March, 2016
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179495720/ 1
petitioner therein may be permitted to pay the demand in four equal installments. Taking note of
the said facts, this Court exercised its discretion and stated that the petitioner in the said Writ
Petition should pay the entire amount in six equal installments.
4. In my view, in this Writ Petition, no direction can be issued at this juncture to direct the
respondent to accept the payment in 24 equal installments. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to
submit a representation to the first respondent, requesting to pay the entire amount in installments
and if the petitioner agrees to remit the same in ten equal installments, then the respondent shall
consider such request.
With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.03.2016
Index :Yes/No.
Internet:Yes/No.
Note : Issue order copy on 07.03.2016
r n s
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.,
r n s
To
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
Employees Provident Fund Organization,
Dr.Balasundaram Road,
Coimbatore-641 018.
W.P.No.8083 of 2016 &
WMP No.7197 of 2016
Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 4 March, 2016
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179495720/ 2
04.03.2016
Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 4 March, 2016
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179495720/ 3

More Related Content

Similar to Royal_Yarns_Coimbatore_Pvt._Ltd_vs_Employees_Provident_Fund_..._on_4_March,_2016.PDF

under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...S.Ezhil Raj
 
Written Arguments against Writ 90 of 2016
Written Arguments against Writ 90 of 2016Written Arguments against Writ 90 of 2016
Written Arguments against Writ 90 of 2016Om Prakash Poddar
 
Drt victory knit fashions
Drt victory knit fashionsDrt victory knit fashions
Drt victory knit fashionsS.Ezhil Raj
 
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singh
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singhCantonment board vs. k.p.singh
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singhkushal576
 
Bombay hc 101017 school leaving certificate
Bombay hc 101017 school leaving certificateBombay hc 101017 school leaving certificate
Bombay hc 101017 school leaving certificatesabrangsabrang
 
Kabil jaiswal v state n anr
Kabil jaiswal v state n anrKabil jaiswal v state n anr
Kabil jaiswal v state n anrZahidManiyar
 
Jethmal Himmatmal Jain And Others Vs State Of Maharashtra On 12 March, 1981 (1)
Jethmal Himmatmal Jain And Others Vs State Of Maharashtra On 12 March, 1981 (1)Jethmal Himmatmal Jain And Others Vs State Of Maharashtra On 12 March, 1981 (1)
Jethmal Himmatmal Jain And Others Vs State Of Maharashtra On 12 March, 1981 (1)msdhillon72
 
Constitutional Lawyer In Delhi | Malkhan Singh & Ors. V/s Union of India & Ors.
Constitutional Lawyer In Delhi | Malkhan Singh & Ors. V/s Union of India & Ors.Constitutional Lawyer In Delhi | Malkhan Singh & Ors. V/s Union of India & Ors.
Constitutional Lawyer In Delhi | Malkhan Singh & Ors. V/s Union of India & Ors.vipul ganda
 
Tambaram municipality
Tambaram municipalityTambaram municipality
Tambaram municipalityS.Ezhil Raj
 
Hp judgment oct 28
Hp judgment oct 28Hp judgment oct 28
Hp judgment oct 28ZahidManiyar
 
Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)
Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)
Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)sabrangsabrang
 
Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017
Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017
Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017Om Prakash Poddar
 
Consumer protection act,1986
Consumer protection act,1986Consumer protection act,1986
Consumer protection act,1986Abhishek Pachisia
 
N.Deenan_vs_The_Collector_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
N.Deenan_vs_The_Collector_on_16_April,_2015.PDFN.Deenan_vs_The_Collector_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
N.Deenan_vs_The_Collector_on_16_April,_2015.PDFS.Ezhil Raj
 

Similar to Royal_Yarns_Coimbatore_Pvt._Ltd_vs_Employees_Provident_Fund_..._on_4_March,_2016.PDF (20)

under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisio...
 
Leshark
LesharkLeshark
Leshark
 
Written Arguments against Writ 90 of 2016
Written Arguments against Writ 90 of 2016Written Arguments against Writ 90 of 2016
Written Arguments against Writ 90 of 2016
 
Drt victory knit fashions
Drt victory knit fashionsDrt victory knit fashions
Drt victory knit fashions
 
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singh
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singhCantonment board vs. k.p.singh
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singh
 
Mitali saran
Mitali saranMitali saran
Mitali saran
 
Bombay hc 101017 school leaving certificate
Bombay hc 101017 school leaving certificateBombay hc 101017 school leaving certificate
Bombay hc 101017 school leaving certificate
 
CASES WP.pptx
CASES WP.pptxCASES WP.pptx
CASES WP.pptx
 
Drt g.selvam
Drt  g.selvamDrt  g.selvam
Drt g.selvam
 
Aijqa v uoi (1)
Aijqa v uoi (1)Aijqa v uoi (1)
Aijqa v uoi (1)
 
Kabil jaiswal v state n anr
Kabil jaiswal v state n anrKabil jaiswal v state n anr
Kabil jaiswal v state n anr
 
Jethmal Himmatmal Jain And Others Vs State Of Maharashtra On 12 March, 1981 (1)
Jethmal Himmatmal Jain And Others Vs State Of Maharashtra On 12 March, 1981 (1)Jethmal Himmatmal Jain And Others Vs State Of Maharashtra On 12 March, 1981 (1)
Jethmal Himmatmal Jain And Others Vs State Of Maharashtra On 12 March, 1981 (1)
 
Constitutional Lawyer In Delhi | Malkhan Singh & Ors. V/s Union of India & Ors.
Constitutional Lawyer In Delhi | Malkhan Singh & Ors. V/s Union of India & Ors.Constitutional Lawyer In Delhi | Malkhan Singh & Ors. V/s Union of India & Ors.
Constitutional Lawyer In Delhi | Malkhan Singh & Ors. V/s Union of India & Ors.
 
Tambaram municipality
Tambaram municipalityTambaram municipality
Tambaram municipality
 
Hp judgment oct 28
Hp judgment oct 28Hp judgment oct 28
Hp judgment oct 28
 
Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)
Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)
Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)
 
Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017
Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017
Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017
 
Consumer protection act,1986
Consumer protection act,1986Consumer protection act,1986
Consumer protection act,1986
 
Jharkhand hc order
Jharkhand hc orderJharkhand hc order
Jharkhand hc order
 
N.Deenan_vs_The_Collector_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
N.Deenan_vs_The_Collector_on_16_April,_2015.PDFN.Deenan_vs_The_Collector_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
N.Deenan_vs_The_Collector_on_16_April,_2015.PDF
 

More from S.Ezhil Raj

Thenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangam
Thenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangamThenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangam
Thenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangamS.Ezhil Raj
 
ORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMEN
ORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMENORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMEN
ORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMENS.Ezhil Raj
 
BAIL APPLICATION
BAIL APPLICATIONBAIL APPLICATION
BAIL APPLICATIONS.Ezhil Raj
 
Sapthagiri transport order
Sapthagiri transport orderSapthagiri transport order
Sapthagiri transport orderS.Ezhil Raj
 
cancel the patta
cancel the pattacancel the patta
cancel the pattaS.Ezhil Raj
 
Tamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery Industry
Tamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery IndustryTamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery Industry
Tamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery IndustryS.Ezhil Raj
 
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took placeunder the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took placeS.Ezhil Raj
 
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016S.Ezhil Raj
 
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...S.Ezhil Raj
 
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014S.Ezhil Raj
 
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)S.Ezhil Raj
 
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016S.Ezhil Raj
 
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014S.Ezhil Raj
 
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016S.Ezhil Raj
 
N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015
N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015
N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015S.Ezhil Raj
 
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015S.Ezhil Raj
 

More from S.Ezhil Raj (20)

Thenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangam
Thenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangamThenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangam
Thenninthya thirumana amaipalargal sangam
 
E.mohanammal
E.mohanammalE.mohanammal
E.mohanammal
 
ORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMEN
ORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMENORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMEN
ORDER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF VICTIM WOMEN
 
BAIL APPLICATION
BAIL APPLICATIONBAIL APPLICATION
BAIL APPLICATION
 
Sapthagiri transport order
Sapthagiri transport orderSapthagiri transport order
Sapthagiri transport order
 
Land Dispute
Land DisputeLand Dispute
Land Dispute
 
FIR Direction
FIR DirectionFIR Direction
FIR Direction
 
cancel the patta
cancel the pattacancel the patta
cancel the patta
 
Tamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery Industry
Tamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery IndustryTamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery Industry
Tamilnadu MInimum Wages Hosiery Industry
 
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took placeunder the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
 
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
Versatile clothing company_vs_state_of_tamilnadu_on_22_september,_2016
 
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
Tirupur south rotary_nursery_and_..._vs_the_additional_central_provident_..._...
 
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014
 
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)
S.soundari vs state_rep._by_on_12_june,_2014 (1)
 
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
Royal yarns coimbatore_pvt._ltd_vs_employees_provident_fund_..._on_4_march,_2016
 
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
P.n. srinivasan (deceased)_vs_the_state_of_tamil_nadu_on_23_january,_2014
 
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
Nethaji transport workers_union_..._vs_the_secretary_on_17_february,_2016
 
N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015
N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015
N.deenan vs the_collector_on_16_april,_2015
 
List new2
List new2List new2
List new2
 
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
 

Royal_Yarns_Coimbatore_Pvt._Ltd_vs_Employees_Provident_Fund_..._on_4_March,_2016.PDF

  • 1. Madras High Court Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 4 March, 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 04.03.2016 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.8083 of 2016 & WMP No.7197 of 2016 Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director - Mr.B.Balusamy, No.04/32, Seventh Cross Street, College Road, Tirupur, Tamil Nadu-641 602. .. Petitioner Versus Employees Provident Fund Organization, Rep. by its Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore-641 018. .. Respondent Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ezhil Raj O R D E R Heard Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the Proceedings initiated under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952. 3. The petitioner would state that due to certain unavoidable circumstances, they could not honor the commitment in time and they are ready to remit the entire amount in 24 equal installments. However, it appears that the petitioner has not given any representation to the respondent and straightaway approached this Court, by filing this Writ Petition, stating that this Court should direct the respondent to accept the entire amount in 24 equal installments. In this regard, the learned counsel for the petitioner referred to an earlier order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2024 of 2015, dated 29.01.2015, (M/s.Tirupur Sri Sentil Cotton Mills Limited Vs. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Coimbatore). In the said Writ Petition, the respondent took a stand that the Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 4 March, 2016 Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179495720/ 1
  • 2. petitioner therein may be permitted to pay the demand in four equal installments. Taking note of the said facts, this Court exercised its discretion and stated that the petitioner in the said Writ Petition should pay the entire amount in six equal installments. 4. In my view, in this Writ Petition, no direction can be issued at this juncture to direct the respondent to accept the payment in 24 equal installments. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to submit a representation to the first respondent, requesting to pay the entire amount in installments and if the petitioner agrees to remit the same in ten equal installments, then the respondent shall consider such request. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04.03.2016 Index :Yes/No. Internet:Yes/No. Note : Issue order copy on 07.03.2016 r n s T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J., r n s To The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore-641 018. W.P.No.8083 of 2016 & WMP No.7197 of 2016 Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 4 March, 2016 Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179495720/ 2
  • 3. 04.03.2016 Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund ... on 4 March, 2016 Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179495720/ 3