The document discusses the concept of trust in relation to the Iranian nuclear program. It argues that trust is underestimated in international relations but is key to ensuring world peace and cooperation between states. The document points to the nuclear deal between Brazil, Turkey, and Iran as an example of how building trust can help address issues like non-proliferation, as the two countries were willing to take a "leap of faith" in their relationship with Iran. Overall, the document advocates for greater trust-building efforts globally in order to make progress on issues like nuclear disarmament and ensuring peace.

1. UNITED NATIONS 2010 The concept of trust in the Iranian nuclear program issue.

2. TRUST

3. It is way more thanthat. Sadly, it isn’t. “We are never so vulnerable than when we trust someone - but paradoxically, if we cannot trust, neither can we find love or joy” Walter Anderson “You may be deceived if you trust too much, but you will live in torment if you do not trust enough” Frank Crane It was supposed to be simple

4. Trust is underestimated by most of the scholars and on the anarchical realm.However, UN members should believe that strenghtenning trust based relationships is the better way to ensure the world peace.

5. Since 1945 Untilnowadays The nuclear issue is simply a matter of trust.

7. The Brazil-Turkey-Iran nuclear deal. Iran made concessions over its nuclear program, but big powers expressed skepticism and analysts said the move seemed intended to split the international community and avert planned new UN sanctions. Apparently, just Brazil and Turkey abandoned mistrust and seem to share a win-win nuclear strategy. The nuclear deal the two nations defended with Tehran is an outstanding demonstration of leadership and TRUST.

8. Regarding the fact that the rest of the world does not trust Tehran’s nuclear aspirations, we have to consider that Iran also has its reason to not trust nuclear powers. The nuclear dialogue is a two way street.Not only non-nuclear states must agree to more stringent measures of verification, but also nuclear states have got to make real progress towards nuclear disarmament.

9. Oracceptthechaosgeneratedbydenuclearizationrefuse. That’swhywemustensuretheexistenceof a nuclear weapon-free world. There are no risk-free nuclear futures

10. It is undeniable that The concept of trust can’t continue to be the weakest one developed in the International Relations literature. Mutual trust, as we saw, is a key to the the processes of cooperation that can mitigate and transcend the dynamics of security competition. The realists are right at one point: uncertainty cannot be completely eliminated. There is no scape from what philosophers call “the other minds problem”, in our case “the other state’s minds problem.”

11. However The possibility of trust-building at the global level must be considered. Sometimes, there are better outcomes if actors choose to take a political “leap in the dark”. That is exactly what Brazil and Turkey have made flying to Tehran and declaring friendship among countries and this should be faced as an example of thinking the unthinkable.

12. We have to trust ourselves, we need to believe in peace. “I don’t need arms, and neither does anyone else... At the very least, a ban would prevent fights turning deadly.” “A war can perhaps be won single handedly. But peace – lasting peace – cannot be secured without the support of all.” Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva