The document discusses the impact of past traumas on current behavior, emphasizing how individuals may compulsively reenact these experiences without conscious awareness. It highlights patterns of self-destructiveness, revictimization, and the influence of early abuse on adult relationships, including the formation of traumatic bonds with abusers. The findings suggest that both male and female victims respond differently to trauma, with men often identifying with aggressors and women becoming attached to abusive partners.

1. Trauma re-enactment
Daryush Parvinbenam,
LPCC-S

2. History
• During the formative years of contemporary
psychiatry much attention was paid to the
continuing role of past traumatic experiences on
the current lives of people.
• Janet showed how traumatized individuals
become fixated on the trauma: difficulties in
assimilating subsequent experiences as well. It is
"as if their personality development has stopped
at a certain point and cannot expand anymore by
the addition or assimilation of new elements”.

3. History
• Many traumatized people expose themselves,
seemingly compulsively, to situations reminiscent
of the original trauma. These behavioral
reenactments are rarely consciously understood
to be related to earlier life experiences.
• Children seem more vulnerable than adults to
compulsive behavioral repetition and loss of
conscious memory of the trauma.

4. Harm to Others
• Harm to Others
– Criminals have often been physically or sexually abused as
children.
– In a study of 14 juveniles condemned to death for murder in the United
States in 1987, 12 had been brutally physically abused, and five had
been sodomized by relatives.
– In a study of self-mutilating male criminals, researchers concluded that
"the constellation of withdrawal, depressive reaction, hyper reactivity,
stimulus seeking behavior, impaired pain perception, and violent
aggressive behavior directed at self or others may be the consequence
of having been reared under conditions of maternal social deprivation.
This constellation of symptoms is a common phenomenon among a
member of environmentally deprived animals."

5. Self-destructiveness
• Self-destructiveness
– Self-destructive acts are common in abused children.
– Green found that 41 per cent of his sample of abused
children engaged in head banging, biting, burning, and
cutting.
– In a study by Van der Kolk (1989) highly significant
relationship between childhood sexual abuse and
various kinds of self harm later in life, particularly
cutting and self-starving.

6. Self-destructiveness
• Several studies have concluded, self
destructive activities were not primarily
related to conflict, guilt and superego
pressure, but to more primitive behavior
patterns originating in painful encounters
with hostile caretakers during the first
years of life.

7. Revictimization
• Revictimization
– Revictimization is a consistent finding. Victims of rape
are more likely to be raped and women who were
physically or sexually abused as children are more likely
to be abused as adults.
– Victims of child sexual abuse are at high risk of
becoming prostitutes.
– Russell (1986) in a very careful study of the effects of
incest on the life of women, found that:

8. Revictimization
• History of physical violence in women's’
marriages seems to have some association
with sexual advances by an unrelated
authority figure such as a teacher,
clergyman, or therapist.
• Victims of father-daughter incest were four
times more likely than non-incest victims to
be asked to pose for pornography.

9. SEX DIFFERENCES
• SEX DIFFERENCES
– The frequency with which abused children
repeat aggressive interactions has suggested a
link between the compulsion to repeat and
identification with the aggressor, this
identification may replaces fear and
helplessness with a sense of omnipotence.
– There are significant sex differences in the way
trauma victims incorporate the abuse
experience.

10. SEX DIFFERENCES
– Abused men and boys tend to identify with the aggressor
and later victimize others where as abused women are
prone to become attached to abusive men who allow
themselves and their offspring to be victimized further.
– Assuming responsibility for the abuse allows feelings of
helplessness to be replaced with an illusion of control.
– Ironically, victims of rape who blame themselves have a
better prognosis than those who do not assume this
false responsibility: it allows the locus of control to
remain internal and prevent helplessness.

11. SEX DIFFERENCES
Anger directed against the self or others is
always a central problem in the life of people
who have been violated. This 'acting out' is
seldom understood by either victims or
clinicians as being a repetitive re-enactment
of real events from the past.

12. INCREASED ATTACHMENT IN THE
FACE OF DANGER
• INCREASED ATTACHMENT IN THE FACE OF
DANGER
– People in general, and children in particular, seek
increased attachment in the face of external danger.
– When there is no access to ordinary sources of comfort,
people may turn toward their tormentors.
• Adults as well as children may develop strong emotional
ties with people who intermittently harass, beat, and
threaten them.

13. INCREASED ATTACHMENT IN THE
FACE OF DANGER
• Hostages have put up bail for their captors,
expressed a wish to marry them, or had
sexual relations with them.
• abused children often cling to their parents
and resist being removed from the home.
• inmates of Nazi prison camps sometimes
imitated their captors by sewing together
clothing to copy SS uniforms.

14. INCREASED ATTACHMENT IN THE
FACE OF DANGER
• Walker, Button and Painter have noted that
the bond between batter and victim in
abusive marriages resembles the bond
between captor and hostage or cult leader
and follower. Social workers, police, and
legal personnel are constantly frustrated by
the strength of this bond.

15. INCREASED ATTACHMENT IN THE
FACE OF DANGER
– During the abuse, victims tend to dissociate emotionally
with a sense of disbelief that the incident is really
happening.
– This is followed by the typical post traumatic response of
numbing and constriction, resulting in inactivity,
depression, self-blame, and feelings of helplessness.
– tension gradually builds (during phase one), an
explosive battering incident occurs (during phase two),
and a calm, loving respite follows phase three).

16. INCREASED ATTACHMENT IN THE
FACE OF DANGER
– The violence allows intense emotional
engagement and dramatic scenes of
forgiveness, reconciliation, and physical
contact that restores the fantasy of fusion and
symbiosis.
– There are two powerful sources of
reinforcement: the "arousal-jag" or excitement
before the violence and the peace of surrender
afterwards, Both of these responses, placed at
appropriate intervals, reinforce the traumatic
bond between victim and abuser.

17. VULNERABILITY TO DEVELOP
TRAUMATIC BONDING
• VULNERABILITY TO DEVELOP TRAUMATIC
BONDING
– Non-human primates subjected to early abuse
and deprivation also are more likely to engage
in violent relationships with their peers as
adults.
– People who are exposed early to violence or
neglect come to expect it as a way of life.

18. VULNERABILITY TO DEVELOP
TRAUMATIC BONDING
• As adults they hope to undo the past by love,
competency, and exemplary behavior . When
they fail they are likely to make sense out of this
situation by blaming themselves.
• When they have little experience with nonviolent
resolution of differences, partners in
relationships alternate between an expectation
of perfect behavior leading to perfect harmony
and a state of helplessness, in which all verbal
communication seems futile.

19. BEHAVIORAL RE-ENACTMENT
– A return to earlier coping mechanisms, such
as self-blame, numbing (by means of
emotional withdrawal or drugs or alcohol),
and physical violence sets the stage for a
repetition of the childhood trauma and "return
of the repressed.