The passage discusses the history and evolution of the US prison system from the early 19th century to today. It describes different eras such as the Reformatory Era, Industrial Prisons period, and Modern Era. Currently, issues like overcrowding, high costs, and recidivism persist due to mass incarceration. To address these issues in the future, the passage recommends downsizing prisons, reducing sentences for nonviolent crimes, increasing education and rehabilitation programs, and reforming parole/probation policies.
IMPACT OF ISLAM AS A SOCIAL TOOL FOR REFORMING INMATES: A CASE STUDY OF IFE P...John1Lorcan
Religion is a universal phenomenon and is a social tool in most part of the world we live in today. Several studies has clearly shown that spirituality is sufficient enough to rehabilitate and reform humans in as much as they seek it (religion) and are ready to go by its dictates. This study investigated the impact of Islam as a tool for reforming prison inmates using Ile-Ife, Osun state prison as a case study. A qualitative research methodology was used whereby oral interviews were carried out and questionnaires were issued. The population used for the study comprised of 20 inmates from an only-male prison in Ile-ife, Nigeria. The data collected through questionnaires were analyzed using frequency, tables and percentage. The findings revealed that Islam has been very useful in reforming the inmates of Ife prison. Muslim missionaries have helped in establishing good relationships, end disputes and foster love between convicts and their families. The study revealed that the impact of I am and the activities of Muslim missionaries in curbing crime and reforming inmates have been great but lack of empirical data makes it difficult to quantify or measure this development.
allowing testimony through closed-circuit television, and allo.docxdaniahendric
allowing testimony through closed-circuit television, and allowing the acceptance of
children’s testimony without corroboration. Finally, they also have been instrumental in
increasing the funding for victim support schemes.
While a good deal of work to assist victims has been carried out by volunteer groups,
it is important to point out that various components of the criminal justice system are making
significant efforts to aid victims. Some of the efforts by the police were outlined in the
section of this chapter devoted to police. In addition, the government has established a
number of magistrates’ courts that specialize in domestic violence cases. These courts are
designed to bring the various components of the justice system—police, Crown prosecutors,
magistrates, probation service, and victim support services—together to facilitate moving
these cases through the system in a more efficient manner. While the rate of convictions
of domestic violence cases has increased in recent years irrespective of the type of court,
the conviction rate in domestic violence courts has reached 71 percent, according to the
Home Office. Presently, there are 98 courts that specialize in domestic violence cases.
In the autumn of 2014, the police and crime commissioners were authorized to
coordinate victim services in their constabularies. Finally, in her 2013–2014 report to the
minister of justice, the Victims Commissioner indicated that there is now “a greater
awareness of crimes, such as, human trafficking, hate crime, forced marriage, modern day
slavery, and female genital mutilation.” As such, people in the victim assistance movement
need to be aware of the expanding needs of society’s victims.
CORRECTIONS
The importance of the juxtaposition of penal theory and the architectural design of
correctional institutions is a notion that emerged in England during the late eighteenth
century. At roughly the same time, police practitioners began in earnest to support
improvements in law enforcement. People were questioning some of the basic assumptions
behind the administration of justice, just as they were questioning many of the established
political, religious, scientific, and social assumptions on which society was based.
Many of these basic tenets had been introduced originally during the Middle Ages, a
period that some have referred to as the Age of Faith. The eighteenth century was a markedly
different period, known by contemporaries as the Enlightenment, the Age of Reason—
espousing a belief that the individual was a free, rational, and equal member of society.
Such notions were obviously at cross-purposes with established custom and authority.
The eighteenth century serves as a useful benchmark for the emergence of the modern
development of English corrections. It was during this time that people consciously and
rationally attempted to study the purposes of and the conditions for incarcerating law
violators. In order to appreciate the contributions o ...
The Haunted Files Case 1, The Eastern State PenitentiaryCharlie
The first of a 5-part series, the Haunted Files goes over haunted places history, how it is haunted, what has reported to have happened and then the possible reasons for and against a haunting at the location. The first is on Eastern State Penitentiary!
Pennsylvania and Auburn
Pennsylvania and Auburn Systems
Name
CJ202
Date
Professor
Pennsylvania and Auburn Systems
When American first became a country the plight of the prisoner was not a major concern. As society become more progressive the need to ensure criminal offenders received humane treatment and to ensure the prison system was more efficient. In Pennsylvania this began with the development of a correctional system that began with the building of the Walnut Street Prison. Quakers in Pennsylvania society were insistent that the prison be separated by felons and non felons establishing the very first prison system in the nation. The Auburn System was created as an alternative model to the solitary confinement model of the Pennsylvania system. Instead of being isolated inmates in this system live side by side.
The Pennsylvania System developed out of the efforts of Quakers at the end of the 18th Century. During the early years of the Walnut Street Jail, the goal was to establish workhouses were prisoners worked all day but with the solitary confinement design came the need for inmates to work in their cells (PCI, 2013). Instead of prisoners facing some cruel or physically painful punishment felons would be placed in solitary confinement to reflect on their bad behavior. During the day the prisoners would work and in the evening hours would go to a single cell that contained a bathroom with a toilet and a shower and a small yard for physical exercise. Prisoners ate in their cells and did not see or speak to other prisoners.
The Auburn system was a prison system developed in New York but instead of solitary confinement and hard labor, prisoners were only in their cells through the night. During the day they ate and worked side by side other prisoners. Under the Pennsylvania system the first prison industry was created were prisoners fulfilled jobs in order to pay for their own stay in prison. The Auburn System employed a similar industry type system as the Pennsylvania System but had a more rigid plan. The plan included the striped suit, close cropped hair, lockstep, and harsh punishments, which included beatings and floggings (O’Connor, 2011).
The Auburn and Pennsylvania System required inmates to work long hours and then sit in their cells to reflect on their criminal behavior. While the Auburn System began with the two men cell the Warden quickly switched to the solitary confinement approach of the Pennsylvania System when the two men cell resulted in conflict breaking out. While the goal of hard labor was to correct the behavior of the prisoner the constant isolation of prisoners was counterproductive to creating an efficient and productive labor force. The Auburn System was different from the Pennsylvania system in prisoners worked together in order to accomplish the work they had been assigned.
In the Auburn system prisoners were classified by the crimes they committed which is .
\\jciprod01\productn\H\HLL\52-1\HLL107.txt unknown Seq: 1 17-MAR-15 10:42
POLICY ESSAY
TOWARD A MORE CONSTITUTIONAL
APPROACH TO SOLITARY CONFINEMENT:
THE CASE FOR REFORM
REPRESENTATIVE CEDRIC RICHMOND
1
The past forty years have brought significant growth in the use of segregation in
penal settings. Prison officials maintain that segregation is an effective tool to
manage dangerous or vulnerable prisoners, but research has demonstrated that
it is being utilized more and more as a commonplace disciplinary tool, deployed
and withdrawn at the discretion of prison and jail management. Researchers
have demonstrated that there are very real human and fiscal costs related to the
segregation of prisoners in isolated settings. The Supreme Court has yet to con-
clude that the use of solitary confinement for prolonged periods is unconstitu-
tional, but evidence suggests that under certain conditions prisoners may
experience such extreme anguish and injury so as to pose a serious inquiry as to
whether cruel and unusual punishment has taken place. Policymakers need to
act to promote more uniform standards for solitary confinement that more
closely comply with the U.S. Constitution. Congress will have a role in promot-
ing reforms to the use of segregation practices in the federal prison system,
administered by the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Prisons. A comprehen-
sive, top down approach is likely unworkable due to federalism implications, but
the federal government is uniquely positioned to work with stakeholders in the
states to reform practices in local prison systems.
I. INTRODUCTION
There is no question that inmates must pay their debts to society, but
justice demands that we extract these payments only within the limits of our
Constitution and accepted standards of human decency. The rising preva-
lence of solitary confinement as an administrative tool for public and private
penitentiaries has also led to a rise in harrowing stories by inmates subjected
to a psychological, emotional, and oftentimes physical hell. Most disturb-
ingly, many of these prisoners are placed in solitary confinement for a pro-
longed or indefinite period of time. This prevalence requires us to reevaluate
whether this practice remains respectful of our laws and values.
This article will address whether the practice of prolonged or indefinite
solitary confinement by prisons should be considered cruel and unusual pun-
ishment under the Eighth Amendment, and whether it violates the due pro-
cess rights of prisoners under the Fourteenth Amendment. It then explores
policy rationales and ideas for addressing this issue.
1 Congressman Cedric L. Richmond represents Louisiana’s 2nd Congressional District in
the United States House of Representatives. He currently serves on the House Committee on
Homeland Security and the House Committee on the Judiciary.
\\jciprod01\productn\H\HLL\52-1\HLL107.txt unknown Seq: 2 17-MAR-15 10:42
2 Harvard Journal on Legislation [Vol. ...
"Nebraska History" magazine is published by Nebraska State Historical Society. This issue details the explosive events of the 1950's at the Nebraska State Penitentiary: guard murdered, guards held hostage, attempted escapes, destructive fire/riot.
The article quotes from "RAMON #17988" (memoir) by Ray "Ramon" Tapia through-out (rtapia.tapia79@gmail.com)
NEBRASKA HISTORY, Spring 2015 (magazine excerpts)Ray Tapia
NEBRASKA HISTORY magazine is published by Nebraska State Historical Society. This issue features the 1950's explosive events at the Nebraska State Penitentiary: guard murdered, attempted escapes, hostages, and riot/fire.
Direct quotes from "RAMON #17988" (by Ray "Ramon" Tapia) are included through-out the article
IMPACT OF ISLAM AS A SOCIAL TOOL FOR REFORMING INMATES: A CASE STUDY OF IFE P...John1Lorcan
Religion is a universal phenomenon and is a social tool in most part of the world we live in today. Several studies has clearly shown that spirituality is sufficient enough to rehabilitate and reform humans in as much as they seek it (religion) and are ready to go by its dictates. This study investigated the impact of Islam as a tool for reforming prison inmates using Ile-Ife, Osun state prison as a case study. A qualitative research methodology was used whereby oral interviews were carried out and questionnaires were issued. The population used for the study comprised of 20 inmates from an only-male prison in Ile-ife, Nigeria. The data collected through questionnaires were analyzed using frequency, tables and percentage. The findings revealed that Islam has been very useful in reforming the inmates of Ife prison. Muslim missionaries have helped in establishing good relationships, end disputes and foster love between convicts and their families. The study revealed that the impact of I am and the activities of Muslim missionaries in curbing crime and reforming inmates have been great but lack of empirical data makes it difficult to quantify or measure this development.
allowing testimony through closed-circuit television, and allo.docxdaniahendric
allowing testimony through closed-circuit television, and allowing the acceptance of
children’s testimony without corroboration. Finally, they also have been instrumental in
increasing the funding for victim support schemes.
While a good deal of work to assist victims has been carried out by volunteer groups,
it is important to point out that various components of the criminal justice system are making
significant efforts to aid victims. Some of the efforts by the police were outlined in the
section of this chapter devoted to police. In addition, the government has established a
number of magistrates’ courts that specialize in domestic violence cases. These courts are
designed to bring the various components of the justice system—police, Crown prosecutors,
magistrates, probation service, and victim support services—together to facilitate moving
these cases through the system in a more efficient manner. While the rate of convictions
of domestic violence cases has increased in recent years irrespective of the type of court,
the conviction rate in domestic violence courts has reached 71 percent, according to the
Home Office. Presently, there are 98 courts that specialize in domestic violence cases.
In the autumn of 2014, the police and crime commissioners were authorized to
coordinate victim services in their constabularies. Finally, in her 2013–2014 report to the
minister of justice, the Victims Commissioner indicated that there is now “a greater
awareness of crimes, such as, human trafficking, hate crime, forced marriage, modern day
slavery, and female genital mutilation.” As such, people in the victim assistance movement
need to be aware of the expanding needs of society’s victims.
CORRECTIONS
The importance of the juxtaposition of penal theory and the architectural design of
correctional institutions is a notion that emerged in England during the late eighteenth
century. At roughly the same time, police practitioners began in earnest to support
improvements in law enforcement. People were questioning some of the basic assumptions
behind the administration of justice, just as they were questioning many of the established
political, religious, scientific, and social assumptions on which society was based.
Many of these basic tenets had been introduced originally during the Middle Ages, a
period that some have referred to as the Age of Faith. The eighteenth century was a markedly
different period, known by contemporaries as the Enlightenment, the Age of Reason—
espousing a belief that the individual was a free, rational, and equal member of society.
Such notions were obviously at cross-purposes with established custom and authority.
The eighteenth century serves as a useful benchmark for the emergence of the modern
development of English corrections. It was during this time that people consciously and
rationally attempted to study the purposes of and the conditions for incarcerating law
violators. In order to appreciate the contributions o ...
The Haunted Files Case 1, The Eastern State PenitentiaryCharlie
The first of a 5-part series, the Haunted Files goes over haunted places history, how it is haunted, what has reported to have happened and then the possible reasons for and against a haunting at the location. The first is on Eastern State Penitentiary!
Pennsylvania and Auburn
Pennsylvania and Auburn Systems
Name
CJ202
Date
Professor
Pennsylvania and Auburn Systems
When American first became a country the plight of the prisoner was not a major concern. As society become more progressive the need to ensure criminal offenders received humane treatment and to ensure the prison system was more efficient. In Pennsylvania this began with the development of a correctional system that began with the building of the Walnut Street Prison. Quakers in Pennsylvania society were insistent that the prison be separated by felons and non felons establishing the very first prison system in the nation. The Auburn System was created as an alternative model to the solitary confinement model of the Pennsylvania system. Instead of being isolated inmates in this system live side by side.
The Pennsylvania System developed out of the efforts of Quakers at the end of the 18th Century. During the early years of the Walnut Street Jail, the goal was to establish workhouses were prisoners worked all day but with the solitary confinement design came the need for inmates to work in their cells (PCI, 2013). Instead of prisoners facing some cruel or physically painful punishment felons would be placed in solitary confinement to reflect on their bad behavior. During the day the prisoners would work and in the evening hours would go to a single cell that contained a bathroom with a toilet and a shower and a small yard for physical exercise. Prisoners ate in their cells and did not see or speak to other prisoners.
The Auburn system was a prison system developed in New York but instead of solitary confinement and hard labor, prisoners were only in their cells through the night. During the day they ate and worked side by side other prisoners. Under the Pennsylvania system the first prison industry was created were prisoners fulfilled jobs in order to pay for their own stay in prison. The Auburn System employed a similar industry type system as the Pennsylvania System but had a more rigid plan. The plan included the striped suit, close cropped hair, lockstep, and harsh punishments, which included beatings and floggings (O’Connor, 2011).
The Auburn and Pennsylvania System required inmates to work long hours and then sit in their cells to reflect on their criminal behavior. While the Auburn System began with the two men cell the Warden quickly switched to the solitary confinement approach of the Pennsylvania System when the two men cell resulted in conflict breaking out. While the goal of hard labor was to correct the behavior of the prisoner the constant isolation of prisoners was counterproductive to creating an efficient and productive labor force. The Auburn System was different from the Pennsylvania system in prisoners worked together in order to accomplish the work they had been assigned.
In the Auburn system prisoners were classified by the crimes they committed which is .
\\jciprod01\productn\H\HLL\52-1\HLL107.txt unknown Seq: 1 17-MAR-15 10:42
POLICY ESSAY
TOWARD A MORE CONSTITUTIONAL
APPROACH TO SOLITARY CONFINEMENT:
THE CASE FOR REFORM
REPRESENTATIVE CEDRIC RICHMOND
1
The past forty years have brought significant growth in the use of segregation in
penal settings. Prison officials maintain that segregation is an effective tool to
manage dangerous or vulnerable prisoners, but research has demonstrated that
it is being utilized more and more as a commonplace disciplinary tool, deployed
and withdrawn at the discretion of prison and jail management. Researchers
have demonstrated that there are very real human and fiscal costs related to the
segregation of prisoners in isolated settings. The Supreme Court has yet to con-
clude that the use of solitary confinement for prolonged periods is unconstitu-
tional, but evidence suggests that under certain conditions prisoners may
experience such extreme anguish and injury so as to pose a serious inquiry as to
whether cruel and unusual punishment has taken place. Policymakers need to
act to promote more uniform standards for solitary confinement that more
closely comply with the U.S. Constitution. Congress will have a role in promot-
ing reforms to the use of segregation practices in the federal prison system,
administered by the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Prisons. A comprehen-
sive, top down approach is likely unworkable due to federalism implications, but
the federal government is uniquely positioned to work with stakeholders in the
states to reform practices in local prison systems.
I. INTRODUCTION
There is no question that inmates must pay their debts to society, but
justice demands that we extract these payments only within the limits of our
Constitution and accepted standards of human decency. The rising preva-
lence of solitary confinement as an administrative tool for public and private
penitentiaries has also led to a rise in harrowing stories by inmates subjected
to a psychological, emotional, and oftentimes physical hell. Most disturb-
ingly, many of these prisoners are placed in solitary confinement for a pro-
longed or indefinite period of time. This prevalence requires us to reevaluate
whether this practice remains respectful of our laws and values.
This article will address whether the practice of prolonged or indefinite
solitary confinement by prisons should be considered cruel and unusual pun-
ishment under the Eighth Amendment, and whether it violates the due pro-
cess rights of prisoners under the Fourteenth Amendment. It then explores
policy rationales and ideas for addressing this issue.
1 Congressman Cedric L. Richmond represents Louisiana’s 2nd Congressional District in
the United States House of Representatives. He currently serves on the House Committee on
Homeland Security and the House Committee on the Judiciary.
\\jciprod01\productn\H\HLL\52-1\HLL107.txt unknown Seq: 2 17-MAR-15 10:42
2 Harvard Journal on Legislation [Vol. ...
"Nebraska History" magazine is published by Nebraska State Historical Society. This issue details the explosive events of the 1950's at the Nebraska State Penitentiary: guard murdered, guards held hostage, attempted escapes, destructive fire/riot.
The article quotes from "RAMON #17988" (memoir) by Ray "Ramon" Tapia through-out (rtapia.tapia79@gmail.com)
NEBRASKA HISTORY, Spring 2015 (magazine excerpts)Ray Tapia
NEBRASKA HISTORY magazine is published by Nebraska State Historical Society. This issue features the 1950's explosive events at the Nebraska State Penitentiary: guard murdered, attempted escapes, hostages, and riot/fire.
Direct quotes from "RAMON #17988" (by Ray "Ramon" Tapia) are included through-out the article
1. Tori Kelly<br />29 October 2010<br />Corrections in America<br />Dr. Donald McCoy<br />ERAS OF INPRISONMENT KGA #1<br />U.S. IMPRISONMENT<br />THEN, NOW, AND IN THE FUTURE<br /> <br /> Introduction<br />“Go to jail! Go directly to jail and do not pass go or collect $200.” While it’s not a monopoly game, imprisonment in America has undergone dramatic improvements, from dark cold cells and torture, to today’s modern facilities and humane treatment. The following eras demonstrate the treatment, punishment and monitoring of offenders. Much of what occurred in the early nineteenth century, the Reformatory Era, Industrial Prisons, period of transition, and the Modern Era effect today’s prison system. Currently there are over 2,000,000 inmates, many who aren’t violent offenders, overpopulating the American prison facilities. This has put a great financial strain on the economy. New correctional policies and alternatives to mass incarceration are needed in the future penal system, as we analyze U.S. imprisonment, then, now and in the future.<br /> Early 19th century<br />According to Allen (2010), the most significant and constant dilemma in American corrections has always been, what to do with criminals to keep them from contaminating our society. The middle ages imposed torture as a means of punishment and penitence. The nineteenth century adopted the concept of group punishment, rather than focus on the individual. This led to the beginning of mass imprisonment of convicts.<br />The Pennsylvania Prison System had small dark cells, required total inmate silence, and labor within the cell. By 1833 these were torn down and larger cells were built, to include enclosed exercise yards. During these early years of incarceration, escape and reintegration into society with a new identity was not that difficult to achieve. <br />The Eastern Penitentiary was square, with cell blocks surrounding a central rotunda, like spokes on a wheel. This ensured continuous maximum security and separation of inmates. This system also required silence, solitary confinement and labor within the small cells.<br />The Auburn System was designed quite differently, with smaller cells designed only for sleeping or punishment, with wings consisting of two to four tiers called cell blocks. This system started a new style of discipline, where inmates work and eat together, but still remain silent and are required to walk in marching formation wherever they went.<br />Crofton and the Irish System adopted a new “marked system”, where prisoners could earn freedom by hard work and good behavior, known as an “intermediate sentence”. This involves three stages, giving prisoners the opportunity to shorten their prison term. First, was solitary confinement, along with monotonous work inside their cell. Second was assignment to public labor. Finally, prisoners were placed in an intermediate (medium or minimum) prison. There, prisoners work without supervision, moving freely in and out of the community, known today as a trustee. Continued good behavior and obtained employment, allowed prisoners a “ticket of leave” which was a supervised conditional pardon, and today is known as parole. This was Crofton’s first effort to create a system called “Conditional Liberty”. <br /> The Reformatory Era<br />The unforeseen consequence of incarceration was overcrowding. The Reformatory Era, from 1870-1910, addressed this issue by deciding what model of prisons to build to help solve this problem. The first Reformatory, built in Elmira, New York in 1876, was intended for adult felons, but instead was used for youths and felons ,aged sixteen to thirty, serving their first prison term CITATION All10 1033 (Allen, 2010). <br />Reformatories had modern sanitary appliances and a lot of natural and artificial light. Inmates now had to wear uniforms and maintain grooming. Prisoners could receive manual training, mostly in metal and woodworking. They had access to a library, religious services, exercise equipment and recreation amongst one another. This era was the most pivotal change in American imprisonment since dungeons and inhumane treatment of prisoners CITATION All10 1033 (Allen, 2010). <br />After the Civil War, the South suffered devastation to the penitentiary system. It had been virtually wiped out. One attempted solution was to lease out the entire convict population to contractors for cheap labor, known as the lease system. What prisons there were didn’t conform to the improved facilities or treatment. Eventually, leasing was replaced by prison farms until the practice was eradicated by the mid 1920’s CITATION All10 1033 (Allen, 2010).<br />Industrial Prisons<br />The major premise of this era centers on using prisoners to perform labor needed to keep facilities self-containing. This was an extension of the early factory workshops. Soon, this system began to show profits and was considered to be a sound operation. It was also considered an important factor in prisoner rehabilitation: preparing them for the workforce after they served their sentence CITATION All10 1033 (Allen, 2010).<br />In 1935, the Ashurst-Sumners Act required that all prison products shipped out of state be labeled with the prison name. By 1940 this act was amended to prohibit interstate shipment, which caused punishment and custody to once again be the purpose of imprisonment. This era posed another significant problem: the prison population increased by 174% from the beginning of the twentieth century until 1940 CITATION All10 1033 (Allen, 2010). Prisoners were not only bored, but also overcrowded.<br /> Period of Transition<br />From 1935 to 1960 was a period of great prison turmoil. Administrators could no longer provide work for inmates, which created a lot of tension and riots. Other contributions to rioting were substandard personnel; enforced idleness; lack of professional leadership and professional programs; excessive size and overcrowding of institutions; and unwise sentencing and parole practices. Prison gangs began to emerge, creating even more conflict.<br /> FBI director, J. Edgar Hoover, through his war on crime, gave America the super maximum prison, Alcatraz. It was constructed to house the most hardened criminals such as Al Capone and Bonnie and Clyde. Plastic ID bands were used in Alcatraz to count and recount inmates, and track their whereabouts. Prison administrators became obsessed with security and community protection by extensive use of locks, head counts, and internal control of inmates CITATION All10 1033 (Allen, 2010). <br />Despite these efforts in dealing with bored inmates through the use of control, prison riots continued to be an unmanageable problem during this era, and the Supreme Court created pressure for reform.<br /> The Modern Era<br />By about the 1960s society also focused on a great pressure for change in corrections. Due to WWII, violent and nonviolent demonstrations, presidential assassination, and the civil rights movement, more violent prison riots and disorder ensued. Due to continued public pressure, leadership and funding by the federal government were given to correctional administrators at the state and local levels. This enabled them to create, implement, and evaluate new standards, policies, and practices. However, media and politicians created inaccurate stereotypes of offenders, resulting in decreased efforts toward rehabilitation (a prevention ideology) of convicts CITATION All10 1033 (Allen, 2010). <br />Inmate security and control improved in this era however, making it very difficult to escape. With advancement in computer bank data, it was even more difficult to start a new identity. This created frustration among prisoners who used riots to express their desire for reforms and changes in rules and conditions. <br />Prisoners began to use riots to express their desire for reform as well, focusing more on individual rights than prison conditions. This was a reflection of what issues existed outside the prison walls, and how social behavior and conditions influence inmates CITATION All10 1033 (Allen, 2010).<br /> Prisons Today<br />The cruel and unusual punishment of the early nineteenth century raised issues in the public eye, which lead to more humane treatment still in effect today. Change was often a result of prison riots in almost every era of imprisonment. Today, prison policies can be changed through inmate council, grievance procedures, conflict resolution, or inmate prison committees. Some systems have ombudsmen, who are officials that represents prisoners’ complaints and seek solutions to them. Administrators have learned over the years that the more diverse the correctional staff is the less turmoil and conflict there will be among inmates CITATION All10 1033 (Allen, 2010). <br />Mass incarceration that began in the Pennsylvania Prison System has grown astronomically. Due to the ease at which inmates could escape and reintegrate into society with a new identity, more security, lockdowns, and head counts exist today, which were first introduced in the Eastern Penitentiary System. <br />The Auburn System, which introduced inmate congregation and use of cells only for sleeping or punishment, still exists today. The Crofton and Irish System which let prisoners earn freedom by hard work and good behavior, helped mold our current system of early release and parole. Rehabilitation through labor, introduced in the Industrial Era, has had a positive impact on reducing recidivism of inmates. <br />With the introduction of the super maximum prisons of the Transitional Era, more were built and still exist to house the most serious criminals. We still use the plastic I.D. bands that this era adopted, in order to keep track of inmates. The improvement of inmate security and control, which began in the Modern Era, makes it nearly impossible to escape maximum and super maximum facilities. <br />One serious problem that still exists today is overcrowding. Over the last 28 years the prison population has increased more than 365%. “The United States now locks up a higher percentage of its population than any other country in the world (Jacobson, 2005, p.8), with more than 2 million currently incarcerated. This is a result of the war on drugs, fear of crime implemented by politicians, the “get-tough approach to crime”, and the media. Allen (2010, p.37) states that “new ideas and programs are badly needed, as the contemporary corrections field appears to be under considerable strain.”<br />The exorbitant cost required to house prisoners puts a heavy burden on the American economy. According to Jacobson (2005, p.48), the cost of one person per year in prison is $20,000. That amounts to $40 billion annually. <br />The most beneficial introduction to the correctional system was that of labor for early release and parole, initiated in the Crofton and Irish System of the early nineteenth century. This concept has reduced inmate overcrowding, boredom and recidivism, promoted rehabilitation, increased supervision of x-offenders, and helped alleviate the cost of life in prison. Unfortunately, argues Jacobson (2005, p. 48-49), current programs have been underused and underfunded, despite proven records of success. The annual cost to supervise one person on parole or probation is only $200. The problem is that the recommended caseload is 30 cases to each officer, but the national average is about 150:1 for probation, and 80:1 for parole. <br />Another problem with supervision of x-offenders is that regulations imposed are so stringent, recidivism ensues due to minor violations and drug use. Also, the heavy case loads officers have to contend with interfere with effective management of parolees. Clearly the current system needs restructuring.<br /> Imprisonment in the Future<br />The major disadvantages of mass incarceration are overcrowding, financial constraint, recidivism, and an aging inmate population. Downsizing prisons will address all these issues. The government needs to redirect funding from excessive incarceration to prevention, rehabilitation, education and post prison management. As Tonry (2004, p.211) points out, a repeat offender convicted of a violent crime, with a history of severe drug and alcohol abuse, and serves a two to three year sentence with intensive substance abuse treatment, stands a realistic chance of controlling his addiction and reducing or eliminating his propensity for crime. Jacobson (2005, p.9), argues that spending money on prevention now will result in greater social justice, reduced incarceration, and less spending on criminal justice and corrections down the road. It stands to reason logically and mathematically that efforts toward reducing crime will decrease the amount of people in prison. <br />Crime reduction is not accomplished by increase in prison use. According to Jacobson (2005, p.39), New York State increased its prison population by 9% from 1992 to 2002 as violent crime fell by 53%. West Virginia increased its prison population by 171% as crime increased by 10%. Money would be better spent on programs that help reduce the crime rate, such as Head Start, self placed education, and job apprenticeship. <br />In order to attack the recidivism rate, government needs to revise probation and parole policies. Jacobson (2005, p.39) contends that “striking increase increases in the number of parolees sent back to prison on technical violations have been driving the size and cost of the current prison system.” Standard conditions that currently exist include having a job, regular reporting, not consorting with other felons, abstinence from drugs, and attending all court-assigned programs. From 1992 to 2002, new admissions to prisons increased by 22% while parole violators increased by 55%. About half of all parole violators are returned to prison. Clearly, the current policies need to be less stringent. Another solution would be to replace prison with community service to lower cost of incarceration. <br />I propose, in addition to prison downsizing, redirection of funding, and revision of probation and parole restrictions, to reduce punitive sentencing of nonviolent drug offenders. Jacobson (2005, p.45-46) agrees that drug laws are the most well known examples of severe sentencing. From 1980 to 2001, 25% of the prison population was for nonviolent drug convictions. Lesser sentences and drug abuse programs would be more economical and effective.<br />Capital punishment is a very controversial issue. Briefly, increased utilization of this policy may not be the best deterrent however; it would help alleviate not only overcrowding but excessive spending as well. While this remains a moral issue requiring much debate, the scope of this paper is only based on the economic aspect.<br />Another factor increasing the rate of prison overcrowding are the baby boomer inmates. Most are beyond the average crime committing age (19-35) and could be released back into society safely. Returning them to family or placing them in nursing homes would be more cost effective use of American tax dollars.<br />Finally, I propose integrating higher education into the prison system for nonviolent criminals. According to Jacobson (2005, p.43), the majority of prisoners are poor and undereducated, resulting in exceptionally low employment levels. While it might seem unfair to those who pay for their own college education, it is more unfair to burden society with the cost to keep these criminals in prison, with the likelihood they will return due to limited gainful employment.<br /> Conclusion<br />The American prison system that began in the early nineteenth century has gone through many changes in order to address issues such as: poor conditions; fair and humane treatment; uncontrolled riots; overcrowding; rehabilitation; post prison management; and exorbitant financial burden. Over the last two centuries, we have learned what works and what doesn’t in order to deal with the complications associated with imprisonment. With prison downsizing, early intervention, shorter sentences, higher education, increased utilization of post prison management, and release of the elderly criminal population, great strides toward economic recovery are possible. <br /> References<br />Allen, H., Latessa, E., Ponder, B. (2010) Corrections in America (12th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Publishing<br />Jacobson, M. (2005) Downsizing Prisons How to Reduce Crime and End Mass Incarceration New York, NY: New York University Press<br />Tonry, M. (2004) The Future of Imprisonment Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press<br />