This assignment is broken into three parts and you must comple.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
This assignment is broken into three parts and you must complete each part of the assignment . Each part includes a text or video scenario to which you will respond by writing a 1–2 page paper for each scenario that examines specific information regarding the events using your knowledge of the United States Constitution. Part 1: Law Enforcement Officer Arrives at the Scene Scenario An 18-year-old high school student walks to class carrying a backpack. He is stopped by the school security guard and his backpack is searched. A loaded handgun is discovered. The school security guard takes the student to the principal’s office. The principal calls the local police. In the state where the school is located, it is illegal to carry a concealed weapon without a permit and all weapons are prohibited on campus. Officer Smith arrives at the school approximately 10 minutes later. Officer Smith takes a statement from the school security guard and searches the student’s backpack. He seizes the gun and places the student under arrest. Officer Smith then asks the student if he would like to make a statement to explain why he was carrying a concealed weapon on campus. The student replies, “What weapon? That’s not my backpack and I never saw that gun before.” The student is then transported to the local jail. However, on the way to the local jail, Officer Smith asks the student again why he brought a loaded gun on campus. The student admits that it was his gun and stated that he needed it for protection. Upon arrival at the local jail, the student is booked. Six hours later, the student is interviewed by a Detective Columbo. The detective reads the student his Miranda warning and asks the student if he would like to make a statement. The student replies, “No, I want a lawyer.” Write a 1–2 page paper in which you: Examine the constitutional amendment or amendments that would relate to this situation. Outline the appropriate procedures you would need to follow to comply with the associated amendments to ensure admissibility of evidence. Evaluate the officer’s actions and determine whether his search, the student’s confession, and the weapon discovery were lawful and/or admissible. Provide a rationale for your opinion. Use at least two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. Part 2: Arrest and Trial Scenario Tyler, a well-known escort service provider in his community, is suspected of the murder of an escort who worked for him. The local police meet Tyler at the airport when he arrives from a trip to Cancun. He is arrested for his suspected connection to the murder of the escort. The police do not inform Tyler of his right to remain silent or his right to counsel. They immediately begin to interrogate him. They continue to question him until he admits that he knew the prostitute and that she worked for hi.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
assignment 1.)Journal Schools of Criminology and Your Career.docx
assignment 1.)
Journal: Schools of Criminology and Your Career
After reviewing the information on criminology and the four schools of criminology, discuss and give an example of how each will influence your selected criminal justice career.
Assignment 2.)
The Rights of Citizens
Overview
It is important to understand your responsibilities as a criminal justice professional when engaging with citizens. This assignment is broken into three parts and
you must complete each part of the assignment
.
Each part includes a text or video scenario to which you will respond by writing a 1–page paper for each scenario that examines specific information regarding the events using your knowledge of the United States Constitution.
Instructions
Part 1: Law Enforcement Officer Arrives at the Scene Scenario
An 18-year-old high school student walks to class carrying a backpack. He is stopped by the school security guard and his backpack is searched. A loaded handgun is discovered. The school security guard takes the student to the principal’s office. The principal calls the local police. In the state where the school is located, it is illegal to carry a concealed weapon without a permit and all weapons are prohibited on campus.
Officer Smith arrives at the school approximately 10 minutes later. Officer Smith takes a statement from the school security guard and searches the student’s backpack. He seizes the gun and places the student under arrest. Officer Smith then asks the student if he would like to make a statement to explain why he was carrying a concealed weapon on campus.
The student replies, “What weapon? That’s not my backpack and I never saw that gun before.”
The student is then transported to the local jail. However, on the way to the local jail, Officer Smith asks the student again why he brought a loaded gun on campus. The student admits that it was his gun and stated that he needed it for protection. Upon arrival at the local jail, the student is booked. Six hours later, the student is interviewed by a Detective Columbo. The detective reads the student his Miranda warning and asks the student if he would like to make a statement.
The student replies, “No, I want a lawyer.”
Write a 1–page paper in which you:
Examine the constitutional amendment or amendments that would relate to this situation.
Outline the appropriate procedures you would need to follow to comply with the associated amendments to ensure admissibility of evidence.
Evaluate the officer’s actions and determine whether his search, the student’s confession, and the weapon discovery were lawful and/or admissible. Provide a rationale for your opinion.
Use at least two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the
library
or review
library guides
.
Consider using Cornell La.
CRJ499 Undergraduate Capstone In Criminal JusticeWeek 7 Assignm
CRJ499: Undergraduate Capstone In Criminal Justice
Week 7 Assignment 2 - The Rights of Citizens
Overview
It is important to understand your responsibilities as a criminal justice professional when engaging with citizens. This assignment is broken into three parts and you must complete each part of the assignment.
Each part includes a text or video scenario to which you will respond by writing a 1–2-page paper for each scenario that examines specific information regarding the events using your knowledge of the United States Constitution.
Instructions
Part 1: Law Enforcement Officer Arrives at the Scene Scenario
An 18-year-old high school student walks to class carrying a backpack. He is stopped by the school security guard and his backpack is searched. A loaded handgun is discovered. The school security guard takes the student to the principal’s office. The principal calls the local police. In the state where the school is located, it is illegal to carry a concealed weapon without a permit and all weapons are prohibited on campus.
Officer Smith arrives at the school approximately 10 minutes later. Officer Smith takes a statement from the school security guard and searches the student’s backpack. He seizes the gun and places the student under arrest. Officer Smith then asks the student if he would like to make a statement to explain why he was carrying a concealed weapon on campus.
The student replies, “What weapon? That’s not my backpack and I never saw that gun before.”
The student is then transported to the local jail. However, on the way to the local jail, Officer Smith asks the student again why he brought a loaded gun on campus. The student admits that it was his gun and stated that he needed it for protection. Upon arrival at the local jail, the student is booked. Six hours later, the student is interviewed by a Detective Columbo. The detective reads the student his Miranda warning and asks the student if he would like to make a statement.
The student replies, “No, I want a lawyer.”
Write a 1–2 page paper in which you:
1. Examine the constitutional amendment or amendments that would relate to this situation.
2. Outline the appropriate procedures you would need to follow to comply with the associated amendments to ensure admissibility of evidence.
3. Evaluate the officer’s actions and determine whether his search, the student’s confession, and the weapon discovery were lawful and/or admissible. Provide a rationale for your opinion.
4. Use at least two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
. Consider using Cornell Law's LII U.S. Constitution Web page. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Part 2: Arrest and Trial Scenario
Tyler, a well-known escort service provider in his c ...
Crj499 undergraduate capstone in criminal justice week 7 assignm
Crj499 undergraduate capstone in criminal justice week 7 assignm
Case Study 1 The Officer and the Drug ArrestOfficer Jones
Case Study 1: The Officer and the Drug Arrest
Officer Jones is a veteran officer with the Smithville police department. He received information that a citizen living in the local housing project was selling drugs. This information was conveyed to Officer Jones by an anonymous caller to the officer on his personal cell phone. Officer Jones immediately went to the housing project and stopped the citizen as he was leaving his apartment. Officer Jones searched the citizen and found drugs.
Note
: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.
Write a one to two (1-2) page paper in which you:
Identify the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions. In your own opinion, discuss if you support his actions or not. Justify your answer using the appropriate case law and Supreme Court precedents.
Analyze the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions.
Determine whether or not Officer Jones’ actions were justified by any of the three (3) ways whereby probable cause can be established. Provide a rationale for your response.
Use at least two (2) quality references.
Note
: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Research and analyze procedures governing the process of arrest through trial.
Critically debate the Constitutional safeguards of key Amendments with specific attention to the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments.
Describe the difference between searchers, warrantless searches, and stops.
Write clearly and concisely about the criminal procedure using proper writing mechanics.
Assignment 1: Procedural Law and the Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights finds its roots in documents such as the British Magna Carta of 1215 AD. It was one of the first documents that provided the common man independence from a monarch. It did imply that the federal government’s law dominated all others; however, it gave each state control of any laws outside of those reserved to the federal government. The Bill of Rights acts as a blueprint that every individual state uses to protect the rights of individual citizens. In this assignment, you will utilize the various concepts found in the Bill of Rights to provide the foundation of the various sections of the question.
Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
Compare and contrast two (2) of t ...
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in a range of criminal justice practitioner roles. Each position will require you to address different issues and concerns indicative of that area of criminal justice—some requiring research, others requiring you to apply methods of inquiry, all leading to the creation of a case analysis portfolio. The final project is supported by two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two and Four. The final submission will occur in Module Seven. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes: •Illustrate the major historical milestones of criminal law in the United States for their impact on the criminal Justice system and the role of the practitioner
•Evaluate constitutional parameters set by courts for their influence on the performance of law‐enforcement agencies
•Evaluate the impact of emerging technology on the development of an ethical criminal investigation • Apply the sociological and criminological scientific methods of inquiry to determine a defendant’s mental state and possible criminal defenses for case preparation
Prompt For the final assessment, you will need to imagine yourself in a variety of criminal justice practitioner roles. You will be presented with a series of case scenarios and will be required to address each of them by utilizing case law research. You will then have to make decisions based on your findings, evidence, and any procedural knowledge you have obtained throughout the course.
The final submission will require you to respond to each one of the following situations and compile them together for a case analysis portfolio. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery and shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!” One month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda rights. Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A.
Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B.
Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision‐making process?
II. Jewelry Store Robbery
A detective was conducting surveillan ...
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself i
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in a range of criminal justice practitioner roles. Each position will require you to address different issues and concerns indicative of that area of criminal justice—some requiring research, others requiring you to apply methods of inquiry, all leading to the creation of a case analysis portfolio. The final project is supported by two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two and Four. The final submission will occur in Module Seven. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes: •Illustrate the major historical milestones of criminal law in the United States for their impact on the criminal Justice system and the role of the practitioner
•Evaluate constitutional parameters set by courts for their influence on the performance of law‐enforcement agencies
•Evaluate the impact of emerging technology on the development of an ethical criminal investigation • Apply the sociological and criminological scientific methods of inquiry to determine a defendant’s mental state and possible criminal defenses for case preparation
Prompt For the final assessment, you will need to imagine yourself in a variety of criminal justice practitioner roles. You will be presented with a series of case scenarios and will be required to address each of them by utilizing case law research. You will then have to make decisions based on your findings, evidence, and any procedural knowledge you have obtained throughout the course.
The final submission will require you to respond to each one of the following situations and compile them together for a case analysis portfolio. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery and shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!” One month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda rights. Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A.
Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B.
Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision‐making process?
II. Jewelry Store Robbery
A detective was conducting surveillance outs ...
Recommended
assignment 1.)Journal Schools of Criminology and Your Career.docx
assignment 1.)
Journal: Schools of Criminology and Your Career
After reviewing the information on criminology and the four schools of criminology, discuss and give an example of how each will influence your selected criminal justice career.
Assignment 2.)
The Rights of Citizens
Overview
It is important to understand your responsibilities as a criminal justice professional when engaging with citizens. This assignment is broken into three parts and
you must complete each part of the assignment
.
Each part includes a text or video scenario to which you will respond by writing a 1–page paper for each scenario that examines specific information regarding the events using your knowledge of the United States Constitution.
Instructions
Part 1: Law Enforcement Officer Arrives at the Scene Scenario
An 18-year-old high school student walks to class carrying a backpack. He is stopped by the school security guard and his backpack is searched. A loaded handgun is discovered. The school security guard takes the student to the principal’s office. The principal calls the local police. In the state where the school is located, it is illegal to carry a concealed weapon without a permit and all weapons are prohibited on campus.
Officer Smith arrives at the school approximately 10 minutes later. Officer Smith takes a statement from the school security guard and searches the student’s backpack. He seizes the gun and places the student under arrest. Officer Smith then asks the student if he would like to make a statement to explain why he was carrying a concealed weapon on campus.
The student replies, “What weapon? That’s not my backpack and I never saw that gun before.”
The student is then transported to the local jail. However, on the way to the local jail, Officer Smith asks the student again why he brought a loaded gun on campus. The student admits that it was his gun and stated that he needed it for protection. Upon arrival at the local jail, the student is booked. Six hours later, the student is interviewed by a Detective Columbo. The detective reads the student his Miranda warning and asks the student if he would like to make a statement.
The student replies, “No, I want a lawyer.”
Write a 1–page paper in which you:
Examine the constitutional amendment or amendments that would relate to this situation.
Outline the appropriate procedures you would need to follow to comply with the associated amendments to ensure admissibility of evidence.
Evaluate the officer’s actions and determine whether his search, the student’s confession, and the weapon discovery were lawful and/or admissible. Provide a rationale for your opinion.
Use at least two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the
library
or review
library guides
.
Consider using Cornell La.
CRJ499 Undergraduate Capstone In Criminal JusticeWeek 7 Assignm
CRJ499: Undergraduate Capstone In Criminal Justice
Week 7 Assignment 2 - The Rights of Citizens
Overview
It is important to understand your responsibilities as a criminal justice professional when engaging with citizens. This assignment is broken into three parts and you must complete each part of the assignment.
Each part includes a text or video scenario to which you will respond by writing a 1–2-page paper for each scenario that examines specific information regarding the events using your knowledge of the United States Constitution.
Instructions
Part 1: Law Enforcement Officer Arrives at the Scene Scenario
An 18-year-old high school student walks to class carrying a backpack. He is stopped by the school security guard and his backpack is searched. A loaded handgun is discovered. The school security guard takes the student to the principal’s office. The principal calls the local police. In the state where the school is located, it is illegal to carry a concealed weapon without a permit and all weapons are prohibited on campus.
Officer Smith arrives at the school approximately 10 minutes later. Officer Smith takes a statement from the school security guard and searches the student’s backpack. He seizes the gun and places the student under arrest. Officer Smith then asks the student if he would like to make a statement to explain why he was carrying a concealed weapon on campus.
The student replies, “What weapon? That’s not my backpack and I never saw that gun before.”
The student is then transported to the local jail. However, on the way to the local jail, Officer Smith asks the student again why he brought a loaded gun on campus. The student admits that it was his gun and stated that he needed it for protection. Upon arrival at the local jail, the student is booked. Six hours later, the student is interviewed by a Detective Columbo. The detective reads the student his Miranda warning and asks the student if he would like to make a statement.
The student replies, “No, I want a lawyer.”
Write a 1–2 page paper in which you:
1. Examine the constitutional amendment or amendments that would relate to this situation.
2. Outline the appropriate procedures you would need to follow to comply with the associated amendments to ensure admissibility of evidence.
3. Evaluate the officer’s actions and determine whether his search, the student’s confession, and the weapon discovery were lawful and/or admissible. Provide a rationale for your opinion.
4. Use at least two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
. Consider using Cornell Law's LII U.S. Constitution Web page. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Part 2: Arrest and Trial Scenario
Tyler, a well-known escort service provider in his c ...
Crj499 undergraduate capstone in criminal justice week 7 assignm
Crj499 undergraduate capstone in criminal justice week 7 assignm
Case Study 1 The Officer and the Drug ArrestOfficer Jones
Case Study 1: The Officer and the Drug Arrest
Officer Jones is a veteran officer with the Smithville police department. He received information that a citizen living in the local housing project was selling drugs. This information was conveyed to Officer Jones by an anonymous caller to the officer on his personal cell phone. Officer Jones immediately went to the housing project and stopped the citizen as he was leaving his apartment. Officer Jones searched the citizen and found drugs.
Note
: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.
Write a one to two (1-2) page paper in which you:
Identify the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions. In your own opinion, discuss if you support his actions or not. Justify your answer using the appropriate case law and Supreme Court precedents.
Analyze the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions.
Determine whether or not Officer Jones’ actions were justified by any of the three (3) ways whereby probable cause can be established. Provide a rationale for your response.
Use at least two (2) quality references.
Note
: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Research and analyze procedures governing the process of arrest through trial.
Critically debate the Constitutional safeguards of key Amendments with specific attention to the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments.
Describe the difference between searchers, warrantless searches, and stops.
Write clearly and concisely about the criminal procedure using proper writing mechanics.
Assignment 1: Procedural Law and the Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights finds its roots in documents such as the British Magna Carta of 1215 AD. It was one of the first documents that provided the common man independence from a monarch. It did imply that the federal government’s law dominated all others; however, it gave each state control of any laws outside of those reserved to the federal government. The Bill of Rights acts as a blueprint that every individual state uses to protect the rights of individual citizens. In this assignment, you will utilize the various concepts found in the Bill of Rights to provide the foundation of the various sections of the question.
Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
Compare and contrast two (2) of t ...
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in a range of criminal justice practitioner roles. Each position will require you to address different issues and concerns indicative of that area of criminal justice—some requiring research, others requiring you to apply methods of inquiry, all leading to the creation of a case analysis portfolio. The final project is supported by two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two and Four. The final submission will occur in Module Seven. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes: •Illustrate the major historical milestones of criminal law in the United States for their impact on the criminal Justice system and the role of the practitioner
•Evaluate constitutional parameters set by courts for their influence on the performance of law‐enforcement agencies
•Evaluate the impact of emerging technology on the development of an ethical criminal investigation • Apply the sociological and criminological scientific methods of inquiry to determine a defendant’s mental state and possible criminal defenses for case preparation
Prompt For the final assessment, you will need to imagine yourself in a variety of criminal justice practitioner roles. You will be presented with a series of case scenarios and will be required to address each of them by utilizing case law research. You will then have to make decisions based on your findings, evidence, and any procedural knowledge you have obtained throughout the course.
The final submission will require you to respond to each one of the following situations and compile them together for a case analysis portfolio. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery and shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!” One month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda rights. Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A.
Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B.
Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision‐making process?
II. Jewelry Store Robbery
A detective was conducting surveillan ...
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself i
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in a range of criminal justice practitioner roles. Each position will require you to address different issues and concerns indicative of that area of criminal justice—some requiring research, others requiring you to apply methods of inquiry, all leading to the creation of a case analysis portfolio. The final project is supported by two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two and Four. The final submission will occur in Module Seven. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes: •Illustrate the major historical milestones of criminal law in the United States for their impact on the criminal Justice system and the role of the practitioner
•Evaluate constitutional parameters set by courts for their influence on the performance of law‐enforcement agencies
•Evaluate the impact of emerging technology on the development of an ethical criminal investigation • Apply the sociological and criminological scientific methods of inquiry to determine a defendant’s mental state and possible criminal defenses for case preparation
Prompt For the final assessment, you will need to imagine yourself in a variety of criminal justice practitioner roles. You will be presented with a series of case scenarios and will be required to address each of them by utilizing case law research. You will then have to make decisions based on your findings, evidence, and any procedural knowledge you have obtained throughout the course.
The final submission will require you to respond to each one of the following situations and compile them together for a case analysis portfolio. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery and shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!” One month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda rights. Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A.
Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B.
Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision‐making process?
II. Jewelry Store Robbery
A detective was conducting surveillance outs ...
This assignment consists of two parts.Part I—Case StudiesS.docx
This assignment consists of
two
parts.
Part I—Case Studies
Select
one
of the three case studies given below. Analyze the facts in the scenarios and develop appropriate arguments and recommendations using case law and scholarly sources. Do not copy the case studies into the paper. Cite your sources in APA format on a separate page. Add Part 2 and submit the two parts in a single document.
Scenario 1: Criminal Law
Hank's Hunting & Fishing Supply, with stores located throughout the state of Utopia, sells a wide variety of sporting goods, including guns. Section 323.45 of the Utopia Penal Code requires every seller of guns to verify that the purchaser has not committed a felony in any state within the past five years. If the purchaser has committed a felony within the past five years, the seller is not allowed to complete the sale. Selling a gun to a felon is considered a misdemeanor and is punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a maximum $10,000 fine.
Wayne Carver, who was convicted of a felony under Utopia's penal code four years ago, purchased a gun at one of the Hank stores. Mel Loew, a salesman, sold Carver the gun without asking for identification or checking Carver's criminal background. Loew never checked whether any of the customers to whom he sold guns were felons. He was not aware of the law requiring him to check on every customer's prior criminal history. However, Warren Peace, Loew's supervisor, knew of the law and also knew that Loew never checked whether a customer was a felon. Hank, the sole shareholder and director of Hank's Hunting & Fishing Supply, knew about the law but did not know that Loew did not check on any customer's prior criminal history.
Carver used the gun in a bank robbery and shot a police officer and a bystander during his getaway. Carver has not been apprehended.
Can Loew be punished under Section 323.45 of the Utopia Penal Code?
What are the potential causes of action for Peace, Hank, or Hank's Hunting & Fishing Store?
What penalties should be assessed?
Does your state have a process that restores a felon's rights to own firearms? If so, provide the law and a short description of the process. Do you feel the process is legal and ethical?
Scenario 2: Employment Law
Sarah Franklin, an Apostolic Christian, worked as an overnight stocker at SaveMore. One night, during a break, Franklin participated in a conversation about God, homosexuality, and same-sex marriages. The next day, an employee told the manager that Franklin made inappropriate comments about gays to Casey, a gay employee. Over the next six weeks, SaveMore investigated the incident by interviewing and obtaining statements from employees who were present during the conversation. In his statement, Casey reported that Franklin pointed her finger and said that God does not accept gays, that gays should "not be allowed to marry," and that they will "go to hell." Four employees confirmed that Franklin said that gays "are going to hell."
SaveMore te.
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief Facts Mr. Miranda was arrest
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief
Facts: Mr. Miranda was arrested at his residence, taken into custody, and subsequently brought
to the police station. While in custody at the police station, Mr. Miranda was identified by a
witness who made an accusation and complaint against him. Mr. Miranda was then interrogated
by police officers for approximately two hours. Mr. Miranda subsequently confessed to the crime
and gave a signed, written confession. Mr. Miranda was never advised of his right to counsel or
his right to remain silent. At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury.
Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20 to 30 years
imprisonment on each count. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s
constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.
Issue: Whether statements that are obtained from an individual who is in custody and being
interrogated are admissible at trial if the suspect has not been advised of his Fifth Amendment
privilege to remain silent and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Ruling: Confession received in violation of an individual’s Fifth Amendment and Sixth
Amendment privileges are inadmissible in trial if the individual has not been advised of his or
her rights.
Analysis: The court held that
there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal
court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of
action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate
themselves. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
As such,
the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming
from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural
safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. By custodial
interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person
has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any
significant way. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
The court further held that
without proper safeguards the process of in-custody interrogation of persons suspected or
accused of crime contains inherently compelling pressures which work to undermine the
individual’s will to resist and to compel him to speak where he would otherwise do so
freely. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
Therefore, a defendant
must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that
anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the
presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for
him prior to any questioning if he so desires. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
Conclusion: Based on the aforementioned reasons, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled and
reversed the conviction of ...
The story of this paper is a veteran police officer Smith receiv
The story of this paper is a veteran police officer Smith received an anonymous call on his cell phone from person selling drugs the office came on into the scene and bump into the suspect and search the citizen and found drugs.
You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.
Write a one to two (1-2) page paper in which you:
You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.
Write a one to two (1-2) page paper in which you:
1 Identify the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Smith ’ actions. In your own opinion, discuss if you support his actions or not. Justify your answer using the appropriate case law and Supreme Court precedents.
2. Analyze the validity and constitutionality of Officer Smith’ actions.
3. Determine whether or not Officer Jones’ actions were justified by any of the three (3) ways whereby probable cause can be established. Provide a rationale for your response.
Use at least two (2) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Write the paper in that order
...
CRJ 550Legal Issues in Criminal Justice AdministrationCase B.docx
CRJ 550
Legal Issues in Criminal Justice Administration
Case Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written case brief. Note the compliance with the required format and how the student gets right to the important points in plain language. If legal terms are encounter which are not understood, chances are that other students will not understand them, so it is best not to use them unless defined within the brief.
Assignment sub-heading: Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel
TITLE AND CITATION: Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 104 S.Ct. 2501 (1984)
TYPE OF ACTION: Review by the U.S. Supreme Court of a lower court ruling that evidence should be suppressed as a result of a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The state (Nix) sought to overturn the motion to suppress that was upheld by the U.S. District Court of Appeals.
FACTS OF THE CASE:
On December 24, 1968, ten year old Pamela Powers was kidnapped from an Iowa YMCA and her body was later found in a ditch, which was within an extensive area that was being searched by volunteers and law enforcement. The defendant was observed “carrying a large bundle wrapped in a blanket…two legs in it and they were skinny and white.” Williams’ car, which contained clothing items belonging to the victim, was found the next day approximately 160 miles from the incident. Based on this information, an extensive search was started that extended from Des Moines to Davenport, Iowa.
Law enforcement obtained a warrant for Williams’ arrest, and he subsequently turned himself into the authorities in Davenport. Williams was arraigned and had obtained and spoken with an attorney. Des Moines police detectives agreed to transport Williams and not interview him during the drive between Davenport and Des Moines. During the drive, one of the detectives on the case began to speak to Williams regarding the need to find the child’s body before it snowed so that her parents could give her a proper, “Christian” burial. The detective did not ask Williams any specific questions during this conversation. At that point, Williams provided statements to the detectives that led them to the child’s body.
Williams was then tried in state court and was found guilty of first degree murder. Williams filed a motion to suppress the evidence of the body and all related evidence concerning the body’s location based on illegally obtained testimony. When the conviction was affirmed by the Iowa state Supreme Court, Williams sought relief in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. The U.S. District Court, U.S. Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with Williams and determined that he was denied the right to counsel and his statements, which led to the child’s body, could not be introduced into evidence.
Williams was tried in state court a second time, without the use by the prosecution of the statements he had given to detectives. Prosecutors introduced evidence of the child’s body under the premise.
Strategic Prosecution PlanningIn Weeks 2 through 4, you will follo.docx
Strategic Prosecution Planning
In Weeks 2 through 4, you will follow a scenario as a case moves from initial crime through sentencing. This scenario is representative of many real-world cases where multiple jurisdictions are involved. As the case progresses, the relevant laws and various parties (police officers, attorneys, community members, and so on) all affect how the case moves through the criminal justice system. Each week, you will receive additional information that may influence how you interpret the case or choose to proceed.
This week, you review the case from the perspective of a
prosecutor
.
Review
the scenario presented in Week 2 and the additional information provided below:
Federal and state law-enforcement officers were to interview the witnesses at the post office and canvass the immediate area for additional evidence. Police reviewed surveillance from several businesses nearby and identified an individual who matched the description given by the witnesses at the post office. This individual was observed on camera entering a vehicle with license plate 123-ABC. Police officers identified the female, Ms. Conspirator, to whom the vehicle was registered, and interviewed her regarding her involvement in the post office robbery. Ms. Conspirator eventually identified the male subject that carried out the robbery as Mr. Stamps.
Below are the relevant state and federal criminal statutes applicable to the robbery.
State Code
If any person commit robbery by partial strangulation, or suffocation, or by striking or beating, or by other violence to the person, or by assault or otherwise putting a person in fear of serious bodily harm, or by the threat or presenting of firearms, or other deadly weapon or instrumentality whatsoever, he shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by confinement in a state correctional facility for life or any term not less than five years.
United States Code Section (18 U.S.C. 2114):
(a) Assault.— A person who assaults any person having lawful charge, control, or custody of any mail matter or of any money or other property of the United States, with intent to rob, steal, or purloin such mail matter, money, or other property of the United States, or robs or attempts to rob any such person of mail matter, or of any money, or other property of the United States, shall, for the first offense, be imprisoned not more than ten years; and if in effecting or attempting to effect such robbery he wounds the person having custody of such mail, money, or other property of the United States, or puts his life in jeopardy by the use of a dangerous weapon, or for a subsequent offense, shall be imprisoned not more than twenty-five years.
(b)
Receipt, Possession, Concealment, or Disposal of Property.— A person who receives, possesses, conceals, or disposes of any money or other property that has been obtained in violation of this section, knowing the same to have been unlawfully obtained, shall be imprisoned not m.
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docx
Running Head: William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Parties
William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Facts
William Jefferson Clinton, the defendant, was elected President of the United States in 1992. In 1991, William Jefferson Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas. In 1991, Paula Corbin Jones was an employee of the Arkansas Industrial Development Commission. The defendant attended a conference that year at a hotel staffed by the plaintiff. Jones claims that she was summoned by Danny Fergson, a state trooper, to go to the Defendant’s suite. Jones claims that while in that room the defendant made sexual advances toward her which she rejected. She also claims that her supervisors consequently changed her duties and treated her unfairly because she rejected the defendant’s sexual advances. Plaintiff Paula Jones filed a civil action against defendant (sitting) President Bill Clinton, alleging that he made “abhorrent” sexual advances. She sought $75,000 in actual damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. Defendant Clinton sought to dismiss the claim on the ground of presidential immunity, or, alternatively, to delay the proceedings until his term of office had expired.
Procedure
The district court denied the motion to dismiss and ordered discovery to proceed, but it also ordered that the trial be stayed until the end of Clinton’s term. The court of appeals affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss and reversed the stay of the trial. President Clinton appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Issue
Does the President have immunity from all suits against him while he occupies the office?
Explain the applicable law(s)
The doctrine of separation of powers calls for Congress, the legislative branch, to enact legislation and appropriate funds. The president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces and is also charged with ensuring that the laws are faithfully executed. The judicial branch is charged with interpreting the laws in the course of applying them to particular disputes. No member of one branch owes his or her tenure in that position to a member of any other branch; no branch can encroach on the power of another. This system is often referred to as being a system of checks and balances; that is, the powers given to each branch operate to keep the other branches from being able to seize enough power to dominate the government (Kubasek, ch.5, pg. 107).
The first charges that petitioner, acting under color of state law, deprived her of rights protected by the Constitution, in violation of Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The second charges that petitioner and Ferguson engaged in a conspiracy to violate her federal rights, also actionable under federal law. See Rev. Stat. §1980, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (Cornell Law).
Holding
The Constitution does not protect the President from federal civil litigation involving actions committed before entering office. There is no requirement to stay the case until the President leaves office. In.
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docx
Running Head: William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Parties
William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Facts
William Jefferson Clinton, the defendant, was elected President of the United States in 1992. In 1991, William Jefferson Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas. In 1991, Paula Corbin Jones was an employee of the Arkansas Industrial Development Commission. The defendant attended a conference that year at a hotel staffed by the plaintiff. Jones claims that she was summoned by Danny Fergson, a state trooper, to go to the Defendant’s suite. Jones claims that while in that room the defendant made sexual advances toward her which she rejected. She also claims that her supervisors consequently changed her duties and treated her unfairly because she rejected the defendant’s sexual advances. Plaintiff Paula Jones filed a civil action against defendant (sitting) President Bill Clinton, alleging that he made “abhorrent” sexual advances. She sought $75,000 in actual damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. Defendant Clinton sought to dismiss the claim on the ground of presidential immunity, or, alternatively, to delay the proceedings until his term of office had expired.
Procedure
The district court denied the motion to dismiss and ordered discovery to proceed, but it also ordered that the trial be stayed until the end of Clinton’s term. The court of appeals affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss and reversed the stay of the trial. President Clinton appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Issue
Does the President have immunity from all suits against him while he occupies the office?
Explain the applicable law(s)
The doctrine of separation of powers calls for Congress, the legislative branch, to enact legislation and appropriate funds. The president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces and is also charged with ensuring that the laws are faithfully executed. The judicial branch is charged with interpreting the laws in the course of applying them to particular disputes. No member of one branch owes his or her tenure in that position to a member of any other branch; no branch can encroach on the power of another. This system is often referred to as being a system of checks and balances; that is, the powers given to each branch operate to keep the other branches from being able to seize enough power to dominate the government (Kubasek, ch.5, pg. 107).
The first charges that petitioner, acting under color of state law, deprived her of rights protected by the Constitution, in violation of Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The second charges that petitioner and Ferguson engaged in a conspiracy to violate her federal rights, also actionable under federal law. See Rev. Stat. §1980, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (Cornell Law).
Holding
The Constitution does not protect the President from federal civil litigation involving actions committed before entering office. There is no requirement to stay the case until the President leaves office. In.
Police must obey the law in their effort to control crime. Legal res.docx
Police must obey the law in their effort to control crime. Legal restrictions may hurt the efficiency of police but by obeying the law, police gain social legitimacy. When a police officer violates the law, they jeopardize the rights of the accused and the rights of the innocent. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution states:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things seized.”
Read
Weeks v. United States
,
Silverthorne Lumber Company, Inc., Et Al. v. United States
, and
Mapp v. Ohio
. For each court case, address the following:
Explain the main issue or question involved in the case.
Explain the precedent or laws the court used in order to come to its ultimate conclusion.
Explain how the court applied the law to the facts of the case.
Identify the conclusion and restate the issue to provide the final answer.
How have these three cases formed the standards of constitutional searches and seizures in the United States?
The paper must be three to four pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least two scholarly resources
.
Respond to each one of the following situations and compile them tog.docx
Respond to each one of the following situations and compile them together for a case analysis portfolio. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery and shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!” One month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda rights. Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A. Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B. Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision‐making process?
II. Jewelry Store Robbery
A detective was conducting surveillance outside a jewelry store that had been robbed several times in the past month. It was 85°F outside, and he witnessed three men pacing in front of the store who appeared to be acting nervous. One of the men was wearing a heavy sweatshirt (later identified as Wilson), while the others were wearing t‐shirts. The detective exited his cruiser and approached the three men. The detective conducted a pat frisk of Wilson and found a hard object in the front pocket of the sweatshirt. He reached his hand into the pocket and located a handgun. He placed all three under arrest and later tied all of them to the repeat burglaries. In court, Wilson’s attorney argued that the detective conducted an illegal search when he located the handgun. Imagine yourself now as the judge.
A
. In order to avoid defense attorneys making this kind of claim in court, new technology could be utilized to aid in the development of cases and in prosecutions. What types of new technology could the detective have employed in his surveillance and arrest that might have helped avoid the defense attorney’s claim of illegal search? Evaluate the impact these types of technology have had on ethical investigations.
B.
Based on the U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), how would you rule in this case? Be sure to defend your ruling with evidentiary support.
C
. Did the ruling justices’ decision in Terry v. Ohio influence the effective performance of law‐enforcement agencies? Defend your position using evidence from the current case as well as the Supreme Court case.
III. Rape Investigation
You are now a detective assigned to conduct a rape investigation.
A
. Select an emerging technology available for investigating rape‐related crimes. How has this technology positively o.
Part 1These are the materials you will need for this course..docx
Part 1
These are the materials you will need for this course.
· Walker, Samuel & Katz, Charles,
The Police In America, An Introduction
, 9th Edition, McGraw Hill
1. How exactly is the guardian mentality likely to improve the quality of policing? Are there any dangers involved in this approach?
2. Discuss why scenario-based training is likely to be more effective even than good, detailed lectures, where recruits have an opportunity to ask questions about situations and tactics.
Part 2
The book for this course is
Criminal-Law-OER.pdf
Chapter 6
1. Describe the requirements of the M'Naghten Defense and the Substantial Capacity Test.
What famous, historical cases were involved the use of each test? What is/are the primary difference(s) between the two tests?
2. Describe what happens to a person who is found to be legally insane during a criminal hearing? Do they go to jail? Treatment? Explain.
Chapter 7
1. Describe each of the different "parties to crimes" under early common law. How are "parties to crimes" used today under most state and federal statutes?
2. 1. Explain the concept of vicarious liability? Is vicarious liability the same as accomplice liability? Explain.
Part 3
These are the materials you will need for this course:
· Swanson, C., Chamelin, N., Territo, L., & Taylor, R.
Criminal Investigation
, 11th Edition, McGraw-Hill
Answer the chapter questions listed below. List the number of the questions when responding and write in complete sentences.
1. Nonfelonious homicide is broken into two parts, Justifiable or excusable. What are the differences between the two?
2. How can the stomach contents of the deceased help an investigator?
3. What is autoerotic death and what is the primary cause of death?
Part 4
These are the materials you will need for this course:
· Samaha, J.
Criminal Procedure
, 10th, Cengage.
Chapter 11 -
Dwares v. City of New York
1. List all the facts relevant to deciding whether NYPD officers allowed Kreitman to beat Steven Dwares.
2. Summarize the Court's arguments applying the state-created-danger rule to the facts of this case.
3. Do you believe it should be the federal courts' "business" to decide when police officers are liable when private people beat up other individuals? If you do, who should make these decisions? State courts? Legislatures? Special panels of experts? Explain your answer.
Chapter 12 -
Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzalez
1. Summarize the majority opinion's arguments supporting its conclusion that Gonzalez has no constitutional right to have the Castle Rock police enforce the restraining order against her husband.
2. Summarize the dissent's arguments supporting its conclusion that Gonzalez does have a constitutional
3. right to have the Castle Rock police enforce the restraining order against her husband.
4. Do you think the Colorado "mandatory" enforcement statute intended to take away the Castle Rock Police Department's discretion in enforcing the .
Discuss three (3) ways that large organizations are increasingly eng.docx
Discuss three (3) ways that large organizations are increasingly engaging in social entrepreneurship and the importance of stakeholder relationships in this effort.
Describe the concept of ‘Third Sector’ innovation and reflect on the motive of non-profit entrepreneurial organizations to service these social needs. Next explain how the concept of uneven global distribution of innovation influences this sector. Provide examples to support your rationale.
I am adding a web link for you to review, here are a few web links on Social Entrepreneurship
1. From Forbes.com here is a list of several young social entrepreneurs.
http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2012/30-under-30/30-under-30_social.html
2.
From Stanford University:
Social Entrepreneurship: the case for Definition.
http://ssir.org/articles/entry/social_entrepreneurship_the_case_for_definition
.
Discuss this week’s objectives with your team sharing related rese.docx
Discuss
this week’s objectives with your team sharing related research, connections and applications made by individual team members.
Prepare
a 350- to 1,050- word Reflection from the learning that took place in your team forum with:
·
An introduction
·
A body that uses the objectives as headings (2.1, 2.2, 2.3, & 2.4 spelled out). After commenting on or defining the objectives (no names) include a couple of individual team member’s specific connections and/or applications by name.
·
A conclusion that highlights a few specifics from the body of the Reflection.
·
A reference page that lists the e-text plus at least two other sources.
.
Discuss theoretical considerations or assumptions relevant to yo.docx
Discuss theoretical considerations or assumptions relevant to your issue. To determine these, consider the research hypothesis you developed in earlier units. What theory or theories (e.g., social learning theory, critical theory, constructivism theory, human behavioral theory, network theory, routine activities theory, etc.) would help to explain the relationship you hypothesize exists between your independent and dependent variables?
.
Discuss theprinciple events of PROCESS AND THREAD used in both t.docx
Discuss the
principle events of PROCESS AND THREAD used in both the hosting OS and the OS management of the appropriate QUEUES. OS may only include Linux, Windows, Unix, ROS, RTOS, and Mainframe.
Initial Discussion - 300 words
2 Responses - each 250 words.
.
Discuss the Windows Registry System Hive1) What information.docx
Discuss the Windows Registry System Hive:
1) What information is retained in the hive?
2) Specifically, what security incident information could be extracted from the System Hive?
1) It should be a minimum of 400 Words not including references
2) APA Format and scholarly References needed
.
Discuss the way the idea of heroism develops from Gilgamesh th.docx
Discuss the way the idea of heroism develops from
Gilgamesh
through
The Iliad
/
The Odyssey
, and
The Aeneid.
Focus your discussion of heroism in each text around both the connection between heroic action and divine will and the relationship between the hero and his people. THREE PARAGRAPHS
Compare the role of vengeance in
Agamemnon
,
Medea
, and
Beowulf
. In what ways does the avenger stand for justice? In what ways does the avenger pose a threat to the continuance of society? What does each text lead you to conclude about the viability of revenge in a civilized society? THREE PARAGRAPHS
Compare the depiction of love in
The Aeneid
,
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
, and the Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale. What place does love have in society in each text? What problems does it pose? How, if at all, are those problems resolved? THREE PARAGRAPHS
1 PAGE
.
Discuss the ways in which the history of the U.S. was presented in t.docx
Discuss the ways in which the history of the U.S. was presented in the stock certificate for the 1876 Centennial International Exhibition in Philadelphia by F. O. C. Darley and S. J. Ferris. Compare it with the overall narrative of nationhood contained in the early 19th century relief sculptures above the doorways in the Capitol Rotunda in Washington, D. C. Be sure to comment on the ways in which these images would have been influenced by the locations in which they were viewed.
200-300 words, work sited
.
More Related Content
Similar to This assignment is broken into three parts and you must comple.docx
This assignment consists of two parts.Part I—Case StudiesS.docx
This assignment consists of
two
parts.
Part I—Case Studies
Select
one
of the three case studies given below. Analyze the facts in the scenarios and develop appropriate arguments and recommendations using case law and scholarly sources. Do not copy the case studies into the paper. Cite your sources in APA format on a separate page. Add Part 2 and submit the two parts in a single document.
Scenario 1: Criminal Law
Hank's Hunting & Fishing Supply, with stores located throughout the state of Utopia, sells a wide variety of sporting goods, including guns. Section 323.45 of the Utopia Penal Code requires every seller of guns to verify that the purchaser has not committed a felony in any state within the past five years. If the purchaser has committed a felony within the past five years, the seller is not allowed to complete the sale. Selling a gun to a felon is considered a misdemeanor and is punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a maximum $10,000 fine.
Wayne Carver, who was convicted of a felony under Utopia's penal code four years ago, purchased a gun at one of the Hank stores. Mel Loew, a salesman, sold Carver the gun without asking for identification or checking Carver's criminal background. Loew never checked whether any of the customers to whom he sold guns were felons. He was not aware of the law requiring him to check on every customer's prior criminal history. However, Warren Peace, Loew's supervisor, knew of the law and also knew that Loew never checked whether a customer was a felon. Hank, the sole shareholder and director of Hank's Hunting & Fishing Supply, knew about the law but did not know that Loew did not check on any customer's prior criminal history.
Carver used the gun in a bank robbery and shot a police officer and a bystander during his getaway. Carver has not been apprehended.
Can Loew be punished under Section 323.45 of the Utopia Penal Code?
What are the potential causes of action for Peace, Hank, or Hank's Hunting & Fishing Store?
What penalties should be assessed?
Does your state have a process that restores a felon's rights to own firearms? If so, provide the law and a short description of the process. Do you feel the process is legal and ethical?
Scenario 2: Employment Law
Sarah Franklin, an Apostolic Christian, worked as an overnight stocker at SaveMore. One night, during a break, Franklin participated in a conversation about God, homosexuality, and same-sex marriages. The next day, an employee told the manager that Franklin made inappropriate comments about gays to Casey, a gay employee. Over the next six weeks, SaveMore investigated the incident by interviewing and obtaining statements from employees who were present during the conversation. In his statement, Casey reported that Franklin pointed her finger and said that God does not accept gays, that gays should "not be allowed to marry," and that they will "go to hell." Four employees confirmed that Franklin said that gays "are going to hell."
SaveMore te.
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief Facts Mr. Miranda was arrest
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief
Facts: Mr. Miranda was arrested at his residence, taken into custody, and subsequently brought
to the police station. While in custody at the police station, Mr. Miranda was identified by a
witness who made an accusation and complaint against him. Mr. Miranda was then interrogated
by police officers for approximately two hours. Mr. Miranda subsequently confessed to the crime
and gave a signed, written confession. Mr. Miranda was never advised of his right to counsel or
his right to remain silent. At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury.
Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20 to 30 years
imprisonment on each count. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s
constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.
Issue: Whether statements that are obtained from an individual who is in custody and being
interrogated are admissible at trial if the suspect has not been advised of his Fifth Amendment
privilege to remain silent and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Ruling: Confession received in violation of an individual’s Fifth Amendment and Sixth
Amendment privileges are inadmissible in trial if the individual has not been advised of his or
her rights.
Analysis: The court held that
there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal
court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of
action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate
themselves. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
As such,
the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming
from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural
safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. By custodial
interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person
has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any
significant way. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
The court further held that
without proper safeguards the process of in-custody interrogation of persons suspected or
accused of crime contains inherently compelling pressures which work to undermine the
individual’s will to resist and to compel him to speak where he would otherwise do so
freely. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
Therefore, a defendant
must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that
anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the
presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for
him prior to any questioning if he so desires. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
Conclusion: Based on the aforementioned reasons, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled and
reversed the conviction of ...
The story of this paper is a veteran police officer Smith receiv
The story of this paper is a veteran police officer Smith received an anonymous call on his cell phone from person selling drugs the office came on into the scene and bump into the suspect and search the citizen and found drugs.
You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.
Write a one to two (1-2) page paper in which you:
You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.
Write a one to two (1-2) page paper in which you:
1 Identify the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Smith ’ actions. In your own opinion, discuss if you support his actions or not. Justify your answer using the appropriate case law and Supreme Court precedents.
2. Analyze the validity and constitutionality of Officer Smith’ actions.
3. Determine whether or not Officer Jones’ actions were justified by any of the three (3) ways whereby probable cause can be established. Provide a rationale for your response.
Use at least two (2) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Write the paper in that order
...
CRJ 550Legal Issues in Criminal Justice AdministrationCase B.docx
CRJ 550
Legal Issues in Criminal Justice Administration
Case Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written case brief. Note the compliance with the required format and how the student gets right to the important points in plain language. If legal terms are encounter which are not understood, chances are that other students will not understand them, so it is best not to use them unless defined within the brief.
Assignment sub-heading: Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel
TITLE AND CITATION: Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 104 S.Ct. 2501 (1984)
TYPE OF ACTION: Review by the U.S. Supreme Court of a lower court ruling that evidence should be suppressed as a result of a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The state (Nix) sought to overturn the motion to suppress that was upheld by the U.S. District Court of Appeals.
FACTS OF THE CASE:
On December 24, 1968, ten year old Pamela Powers was kidnapped from an Iowa YMCA and her body was later found in a ditch, which was within an extensive area that was being searched by volunteers and law enforcement. The defendant was observed “carrying a large bundle wrapped in a blanket…two legs in it and they were skinny and white.” Williams’ car, which contained clothing items belonging to the victim, was found the next day approximately 160 miles from the incident. Based on this information, an extensive search was started that extended from Des Moines to Davenport, Iowa.
Law enforcement obtained a warrant for Williams’ arrest, and he subsequently turned himself into the authorities in Davenport. Williams was arraigned and had obtained and spoken with an attorney. Des Moines police detectives agreed to transport Williams and not interview him during the drive between Davenport and Des Moines. During the drive, one of the detectives on the case began to speak to Williams regarding the need to find the child’s body before it snowed so that her parents could give her a proper, “Christian” burial. The detective did not ask Williams any specific questions during this conversation. At that point, Williams provided statements to the detectives that led them to the child’s body.
Williams was then tried in state court and was found guilty of first degree murder. Williams filed a motion to suppress the evidence of the body and all related evidence concerning the body’s location based on illegally obtained testimony. When the conviction was affirmed by the Iowa state Supreme Court, Williams sought relief in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. The U.S. District Court, U.S. Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with Williams and determined that he was denied the right to counsel and his statements, which led to the child’s body, could not be introduced into evidence.
Williams was tried in state court a second time, without the use by the prosecution of the statements he had given to detectives. Prosecutors introduced evidence of the child’s body under the premise.
Strategic Prosecution PlanningIn Weeks 2 through 4, you will follo.docx
Strategic Prosecution Planning
In Weeks 2 through 4, you will follow a scenario as a case moves from initial crime through sentencing. This scenario is representative of many real-world cases where multiple jurisdictions are involved. As the case progresses, the relevant laws and various parties (police officers, attorneys, community members, and so on) all affect how the case moves through the criminal justice system. Each week, you will receive additional information that may influence how you interpret the case or choose to proceed.
This week, you review the case from the perspective of a
prosecutor
.
Review
the scenario presented in Week 2 and the additional information provided below:
Federal and state law-enforcement officers were to interview the witnesses at the post office and canvass the immediate area for additional evidence. Police reviewed surveillance from several businesses nearby and identified an individual who matched the description given by the witnesses at the post office. This individual was observed on camera entering a vehicle with license plate 123-ABC. Police officers identified the female, Ms. Conspirator, to whom the vehicle was registered, and interviewed her regarding her involvement in the post office robbery. Ms. Conspirator eventually identified the male subject that carried out the robbery as Mr. Stamps.
Below are the relevant state and federal criminal statutes applicable to the robbery.
State Code
If any person commit robbery by partial strangulation, or suffocation, or by striking or beating, or by other violence to the person, or by assault or otherwise putting a person in fear of serious bodily harm, or by the threat or presenting of firearms, or other deadly weapon or instrumentality whatsoever, he shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by confinement in a state correctional facility for life or any term not less than five years.
United States Code Section (18 U.S.C. 2114):
(a) Assault.— A person who assaults any person having lawful charge, control, or custody of any mail matter or of any money or other property of the United States, with intent to rob, steal, or purloin such mail matter, money, or other property of the United States, or robs or attempts to rob any such person of mail matter, or of any money, or other property of the United States, shall, for the first offense, be imprisoned not more than ten years; and if in effecting or attempting to effect such robbery he wounds the person having custody of such mail, money, or other property of the United States, or puts his life in jeopardy by the use of a dangerous weapon, or for a subsequent offense, shall be imprisoned not more than twenty-five years.
(b)
Receipt, Possession, Concealment, or Disposal of Property.— A person who receives, possesses, conceals, or disposes of any money or other property that has been obtained in violation of this section, knowing the same to have been unlawfully obtained, shall be imprisoned not m.
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docx
Running Head: William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Parties
William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Facts
William Jefferson Clinton, the defendant, was elected President of the United States in 1992. In 1991, William Jefferson Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas. In 1991, Paula Corbin Jones was an employee of the Arkansas Industrial Development Commission. The defendant attended a conference that year at a hotel staffed by the plaintiff. Jones claims that she was summoned by Danny Fergson, a state trooper, to go to the Defendant’s suite. Jones claims that while in that room the defendant made sexual advances toward her which she rejected. She also claims that her supervisors consequently changed her duties and treated her unfairly because she rejected the defendant’s sexual advances. Plaintiff Paula Jones filed a civil action against defendant (sitting) President Bill Clinton, alleging that he made “abhorrent” sexual advances. She sought $75,000 in actual damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. Defendant Clinton sought to dismiss the claim on the ground of presidential immunity, or, alternatively, to delay the proceedings until his term of office had expired.
Procedure
The district court denied the motion to dismiss and ordered discovery to proceed, but it also ordered that the trial be stayed until the end of Clinton’s term. The court of appeals affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss and reversed the stay of the trial. President Clinton appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Issue
Does the President have immunity from all suits against him while he occupies the office?
Explain the applicable law(s)
The doctrine of separation of powers calls for Congress, the legislative branch, to enact legislation and appropriate funds. The president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces and is also charged with ensuring that the laws are faithfully executed. The judicial branch is charged with interpreting the laws in the course of applying them to particular disputes. No member of one branch owes his or her tenure in that position to a member of any other branch; no branch can encroach on the power of another. This system is often referred to as being a system of checks and balances; that is, the powers given to each branch operate to keep the other branches from being able to seize enough power to dominate the government (Kubasek, ch.5, pg. 107).
The first charges that petitioner, acting under color of state law, deprived her of rights protected by the Constitution, in violation of Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The second charges that petitioner and Ferguson engaged in a conspiracy to violate her federal rights, also actionable under federal law. See Rev. Stat. §1980, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (Cornell Law).
Holding
The Constitution does not protect the President from federal civil litigation involving actions committed before entering office. There is no requirement to stay the case until the President leaves office. In.
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docx
Running Head: William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Parties
William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Facts
William Jefferson Clinton, the defendant, was elected President of the United States in 1992. In 1991, William Jefferson Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas. In 1991, Paula Corbin Jones was an employee of the Arkansas Industrial Development Commission. The defendant attended a conference that year at a hotel staffed by the plaintiff. Jones claims that she was summoned by Danny Fergson, a state trooper, to go to the Defendant’s suite. Jones claims that while in that room the defendant made sexual advances toward her which she rejected. She also claims that her supervisors consequently changed her duties and treated her unfairly because she rejected the defendant’s sexual advances. Plaintiff Paula Jones filed a civil action against defendant (sitting) President Bill Clinton, alleging that he made “abhorrent” sexual advances. She sought $75,000 in actual damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. Defendant Clinton sought to dismiss the claim on the ground of presidential immunity, or, alternatively, to delay the proceedings until his term of office had expired.
Procedure
The district court denied the motion to dismiss and ordered discovery to proceed, but it also ordered that the trial be stayed until the end of Clinton’s term. The court of appeals affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss and reversed the stay of the trial. President Clinton appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Issue
Does the President have immunity from all suits against him while he occupies the office?
Explain the applicable law(s)
The doctrine of separation of powers calls for Congress, the legislative branch, to enact legislation and appropriate funds. The president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces and is also charged with ensuring that the laws are faithfully executed. The judicial branch is charged with interpreting the laws in the course of applying them to particular disputes. No member of one branch owes his or her tenure in that position to a member of any other branch; no branch can encroach on the power of another. This system is often referred to as being a system of checks and balances; that is, the powers given to each branch operate to keep the other branches from being able to seize enough power to dominate the government (Kubasek, ch.5, pg. 107).
The first charges that petitioner, acting under color of state law, deprived her of rights protected by the Constitution, in violation of Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The second charges that petitioner and Ferguson engaged in a conspiracy to violate her federal rights, also actionable under federal law. See Rev. Stat. §1980, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (Cornell Law).
Holding
The Constitution does not protect the President from federal civil litigation involving actions committed before entering office. There is no requirement to stay the case until the President leaves office. In.
Police must obey the law in their effort to control crime. Legal res.docx
Police must obey the law in their effort to control crime. Legal restrictions may hurt the efficiency of police but by obeying the law, police gain social legitimacy. When a police officer violates the law, they jeopardize the rights of the accused and the rights of the innocent. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution states:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things seized.”
Read
Weeks v. United States
,
Silverthorne Lumber Company, Inc., Et Al. v. United States
, and
Mapp v. Ohio
. For each court case, address the following:
Explain the main issue or question involved in the case.
Explain the precedent or laws the court used in order to come to its ultimate conclusion.
Explain how the court applied the law to the facts of the case.
Identify the conclusion and restate the issue to provide the final answer.
How have these three cases formed the standards of constitutional searches and seizures in the United States?
The paper must be three to four pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least two scholarly resources
.
Respond to each one of the following situations and compile them tog.docx
Respond to each one of the following situations and compile them together for a case analysis portfolio. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery and shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!” One month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda rights. Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A. Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B. Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision‐making process?
II. Jewelry Store Robbery
A detective was conducting surveillance outside a jewelry store that had been robbed several times in the past month. It was 85°F outside, and he witnessed three men pacing in front of the store who appeared to be acting nervous. One of the men was wearing a heavy sweatshirt (later identified as Wilson), while the others were wearing t‐shirts. The detective exited his cruiser and approached the three men. The detective conducted a pat frisk of Wilson and found a hard object in the front pocket of the sweatshirt. He reached his hand into the pocket and located a handgun. He placed all three under arrest and later tied all of them to the repeat burglaries. In court, Wilson’s attorney argued that the detective conducted an illegal search when he located the handgun. Imagine yourself now as the judge.
A
. In order to avoid defense attorneys making this kind of claim in court, new technology could be utilized to aid in the development of cases and in prosecutions. What types of new technology could the detective have employed in his surveillance and arrest that might have helped avoid the defense attorney’s claim of illegal search? Evaluate the impact these types of technology have had on ethical investigations.
B.
Based on the U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), how would you rule in this case? Be sure to defend your ruling with evidentiary support.
C
. Did the ruling justices’ decision in Terry v. Ohio influence the effective performance of law‐enforcement agencies? Defend your position using evidence from the current case as well as the Supreme Court case.
III. Rape Investigation
You are now a detective assigned to conduct a rape investigation.
A
. Select an emerging technology available for investigating rape‐related crimes. How has this technology positively o.
Part 1These are the materials you will need for this course..docx
Part 1
These are the materials you will need for this course.
· Walker, Samuel & Katz, Charles,
The Police In America, An Introduction
, 9th Edition, McGraw Hill
1. How exactly is the guardian mentality likely to improve the quality of policing? Are there any dangers involved in this approach?
2. Discuss why scenario-based training is likely to be more effective even than good, detailed lectures, where recruits have an opportunity to ask questions about situations and tactics.
Part 2
The book for this course is
Criminal-Law-OER.pdf
Chapter 6
1. Describe the requirements of the M'Naghten Defense and the Substantial Capacity Test.
What famous, historical cases were involved the use of each test? What is/are the primary difference(s) between the two tests?
2. Describe what happens to a person who is found to be legally insane during a criminal hearing? Do they go to jail? Treatment? Explain.
Chapter 7
1. Describe each of the different "parties to crimes" under early common law. How are "parties to crimes" used today under most state and federal statutes?
2. 1. Explain the concept of vicarious liability? Is vicarious liability the same as accomplice liability? Explain.
Part 3
These are the materials you will need for this course:
· Swanson, C., Chamelin, N., Territo, L., & Taylor, R.
Criminal Investigation
, 11th Edition, McGraw-Hill
Answer the chapter questions listed below. List the number of the questions when responding and write in complete sentences.
1. Nonfelonious homicide is broken into two parts, Justifiable or excusable. What are the differences between the two?
2. How can the stomach contents of the deceased help an investigator?
3. What is autoerotic death and what is the primary cause of death?
Part 4
These are the materials you will need for this course:
· Samaha, J.
Criminal Procedure
, 10th, Cengage.
Chapter 11 -
Dwares v. City of New York
1. List all the facts relevant to deciding whether NYPD officers allowed Kreitman to beat Steven Dwares.
2. Summarize the Court's arguments applying the state-created-danger rule to the facts of this case.
3. Do you believe it should be the federal courts' "business" to decide when police officers are liable when private people beat up other individuals? If you do, who should make these decisions? State courts? Legislatures? Special panels of experts? Explain your answer.
Chapter 12 -
Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzalez
1. Summarize the majority opinion's arguments supporting its conclusion that Gonzalez has no constitutional right to have the Castle Rock police enforce the restraining order against her husband.
2. Summarize the dissent's arguments supporting its conclusion that Gonzalez does have a constitutional
3. right to have the Castle Rock police enforce the restraining order against her husband.
4. Do you think the Colorado "mandatory" enforcement statute intended to take away the Castle Rock Police Department's discretion in enforcing the .
Similar to This assignment is broken into three parts and you must comple.docx (15)
This assignment consists of two parts.Part I—Case StudiesS.docx
This assignment consists of two parts.Part I—Case StudiesS.docx
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief Facts Mr. Miranda was arrest
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief Facts Mr. Miranda was arrest
The story of this paper is a veteran police officer Smith receiv
The story of this paper is a veteran police officer Smith receiv
CRJ 550Legal Issues in Criminal Justice AdministrationCase B.docx
CRJ 550Legal Issues in Criminal Justice AdministrationCase B.docx
Strategic Prosecution PlanningIn Weeks 2 through 4, you will follo.docx
Strategic Prosecution PlanningIn Weeks 2 through 4, you will follo.docx
The Fourth Amendment is one of the cornerstones of our.docx
The Fourth Amendment is one of the cornerstones of our.docx
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docx
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docx
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docx
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docx
Police must obey the law in their effort to control crime. Legal res.docx
Police must obey the law in their effort to control crime. Legal res.docx
Respond to each one of the following situations and compile them tog.docx
Respond to each one of the following situations and compile them tog.docx
Part 1These are the materials you will need for this course..docx
Part 1These are the materials you will need for this course..docx
More from rhetttrevannion
Discuss three (3) ways that large organizations are increasingly eng.docx
Discuss three (3) ways that large organizations are increasingly engaging in social entrepreneurship and the importance of stakeholder relationships in this effort.
Describe the concept of ‘Third Sector’ innovation and reflect on the motive of non-profit entrepreneurial organizations to service these social needs. Next explain how the concept of uneven global distribution of innovation influences this sector. Provide examples to support your rationale.
I am adding a web link for you to review, here are a few web links on Social Entrepreneurship
1. From Forbes.com here is a list of several young social entrepreneurs.
http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2012/30-under-30/30-under-30_social.html
2.
From Stanford University:
Social Entrepreneurship: the case for Definition.
http://ssir.org/articles/entry/social_entrepreneurship_the_case_for_definition
.
Discuss this week’s objectives with your team sharing related rese.docx
Discuss
this week’s objectives with your team sharing related research, connections and applications made by individual team members.
Prepare
a 350- to 1,050- word Reflection from the learning that took place in your team forum with:
·
An introduction
·
A body that uses the objectives as headings (2.1, 2.2, 2.3, & 2.4 spelled out). After commenting on or defining the objectives (no names) include a couple of individual team member’s specific connections and/or applications by name.
·
A conclusion that highlights a few specifics from the body of the Reflection.
·
A reference page that lists the e-text plus at least two other sources.
.
Discuss theoretical considerations or assumptions relevant to yo.docx
Discuss theoretical considerations or assumptions relevant to your issue. To determine these, consider the research hypothesis you developed in earlier units. What theory or theories (e.g., social learning theory, critical theory, constructivism theory, human behavioral theory, network theory, routine activities theory, etc.) would help to explain the relationship you hypothesize exists between your independent and dependent variables?
.
Discuss theprinciple events of PROCESS AND THREAD used in both t.docx
Discuss the
principle events of PROCESS AND THREAD used in both the hosting OS and the OS management of the appropriate QUEUES. OS may only include Linux, Windows, Unix, ROS, RTOS, and Mainframe.
Initial Discussion - 300 words
2 Responses - each 250 words.
.
Discuss the Windows Registry System Hive1) What information.docx
Discuss the Windows Registry System Hive:
1) What information is retained in the hive?
2) Specifically, what security incident information could be extracted from the System Hive?
1) It should be a minimum of 400 Words not including references
2) APA Format and scholarly References needed
.
Discuss the way the idea of heroism develops from Gilgamesh th.docx
Discuss the way the idea of heroism develops from
Gilgamesh
through
The Iliad
/
The Odyssey
, and
The Aeneid.
Focus your discussion of heroism in each text around both the connection between heroic action and divine will and the relationship between the hero and his people. THREE PARAGRAPHS
Compare the role of vengeance in
Agamemnon
,
Medea
, and
Beowulf
. In what ways does the avenger stand for justice? In what ways does the avenger pose a threat to the continuance of society? What does each text lead you to conclude about the viability of revenge in a civilized society? THREE PARAGRAPHS
Compare the depiction of love in
The Aeneid
,
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
, and the Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale. What place does love have in society in each text? What problems does it pose? How, if at all, are those problems resolved? THREE PARAGRAPHS
1 PAGE
.
Discuss the ways in which the history of the U.S. was presented in t.docx
Discuss the ways in which the history of the U.S. was presented in the stock certificate for the 1876 Centennial International Exhibition in Philadelphia by F. O. C. Darley and S. J. Ferris. Compare it with the overall narrative of nationhood contained in the early 19th century relief sculptures above the doorways in the Capitol Rotunda in Washington, D. C. Be sure to comment on the ways in which these images would have been influenced by the locations in which they were viewed.
200-300 words, work sited
.
Discuss the value of Lean Systems Engineering to systems develop.docx
Discuss the value of Lean Systems Engineering to systems development (1 – 2 pages).
This assignment will be graded on two factors: 1.) the degree to which the response depicts clear and comprehensive understanding of the topic/material (80 points); and 2.) the degree to which the response is well thought through and clearly articulated (20 points).
.
discuss the various pathways interest groups use to influence politi.docx
discuss the various pathways interest groups use to influence politics and policy in the U.S. Discuss three way interest groups influence government. What are these methods, how do they work, and why are they effective at influencing government.
discuss the three components of political parties. Discuss party-in-the-electorate, party organization, and party-in-government. Briefly describe who makes up each component and what each component does.
.
Discuss the various tools and techniques used by an HCO to incre.docx
Discuss the various tools and techniques used by an HCO to increase logistical efficiency. Why would an organization need to measure the capacity (throughput) of the various resources (x-ray equipment, exam rooms, length of stay, etc.)? How does capacity utilization support decision making? PLEASE INCLUDE IN-TEXT CITATIONAND REFERENCE
.
Discuss the various means by which slaves resisted the slave system..docx
Discuss the various means by which slaves resisted the slave system. How widespread was such resistance? What were the most common and effective tactics? What does the prevalence of resistance reveal not only about slaves’ attitude toward slavery but also their ability to shape the conditions under which they lived and worked?
one page, doubled spaced, in Times New Roman font, with standard
1 inch margins on all sides
.
Discuss the typica l clinical presentation of the diagnosis , Hip Os.docx
Discuss the typica l clinical presentation of the diagnosis , Hip Osteoarthritis(OA), included possible therapeutic exercise treatment intervention, also recommendations for the management of the condition.
Introduction: First about OA and then write about Hip OA
Describe the pathophysiology of the diagnosis and the expected clinical presentation anticipated. If it varies, them describe common variations.
Discuss
etiology
and
demographics
related to the diagnosis(I.e., is this dx more common in men than women, what age, group ect)
Very important only use the articles provides, not citation work submitted via turnitin!!!!
.
Discuss the types of resources, tools, and methods that are availabl.docx
Discuss the types of resources, tools, and methods that are available to leaders for data collection and analysis, including organization assessments such as Baldrige, SWOT, and others. What techniques does your organization utilize to make decisions?
You can use US Navy for the organization.
.
Discuss the types of items that should be examined in a firewall log.docx
Discuss the types of items that should be examined in a firewall log:
a. IP addresses that are being rejected and dropped
b. Probes to ports that have no application services running on them
c. Source-routed packets
d. Suspicious outbound connections
e. Unsuccessful logins
.
Discuss the types of property, providing an example of each an.docx
Discuss the types of property, providing an example of each and why each falls into its classification.
Provide an instance of when you have seen eminent domain in action in your community. If you have not seen this situation, create an example of how this may occur.
.
Discuss the type of personality it takes to become a police officer..docx
Discuss the type of personality it takes to become a police officer. Why is this type of individual personality required for police work? What are the dangers to having this type of individual in police work?
Be sure to support your position with a very detailed explanation or a source citation.
.
Discuss the two major sources of crime statistics for the United Sta.docx
Discuss the two major sources of crime statistics for the United States. Uniform Crime Report (UCR), National Crime Victim Survey (NCVS), and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), including
but not limited to
: the Part I and II offenses, UCR terminology, how the UCR and NCVS collect crime data, types of information collected and not collected by the NCVS, accuracy issues with the UCR and NCVS, and the role and purpose of the NIBRS
.
Discuss the two most prominent theories related to the stage of adul.docx
Discuss the two most prominent theories related to the stage of adulthood: Erikson’s Stage of Generativity vs. Stagnation and Levinson’s Season’s of a Man’s Life. Describe how theory conceptualizes middle adulthood and explain the growth of development changes that occur during this stage. Using Figure 16.7 as your reference, describe the impact of daily hassles and daily uplifts on the midlife stage of adulthood. In your post, please address the role of stress and personal control on life satisfaction and happiness during midlife development.
.
Discuss the two elements required for the consent defense. In ad.docx
Discuss the two elements required for the consent defense. In addition, please identify three situations where consent can operate as a legal defense.
The paper must be 1-2 pages.
Use proper APA formatting and citations, including ‘in-text’ citations.
Reference at least 2 outside credible resources.
DUE SUNDAY MORNING STAND PACIFIC TIME
.
Discuss the Truth in Lending Act and what role it places in financia.docx
Discuss the Truth in Lending Act and what role it places in financial and regulatory reports requirements in regards to funds acquisition strategies. What are various important terms which must be disclosed and their meaning?
Rose, P.S., & Marquis, M.H., chap. 4, 17, & 21
Due Date:
7/13/2014 11:59:59 PM (5 Days)
Total Pts:
125
Points Earned:
n/a
Deliverable Length:
600-800 words
Assignment Type:
Individual Project
.
More from rhetttrevannion (20)
Discuss three (3) ways that large organizations are increasingly eng.docx
Discuss three (3) ways that large organizations are increasingly eng.docx
Discuss this week’s objectives with your team sharing related rese.docx
Discuss this week’s objectives with your team sharing related rese.docx
Discuss theoretical considerations or assumptions relevant to yo.docx
Discuss theoretical considerations or assumptions relevant to yo.docx
Discuss theprinciple events of PROCESS AND THREAD used in both t.docx
Discuss theprinciple events of PROCESS AND THREAD used in both t.docx
Discuss the Windows Registry System Hive1) What information.docx
Discuss the Windows Registry System Hive1) What information.docx
Discuss the way the idea of heroism develops from Gilgamesh th.docx
Discuss the way the idea of heroism develops from Gilgamesh th.docx
Discuss the ways in which the history of the U.S. was presented in t.docx
Discuss the ways in which the history of the U.S. was presented in t.docx
Discuss the value of Lean Systems Engineering to systems develop.docx
Discuss the value of Lean Systems Engineering to systems develop.docx
discuss the various pathways interest groups use to influence politi.docx
discuss the various pathways interest groups use to influence politi.docx
Discuss the various tools and techniques used by an HCO to incre.docx
Discuss the various tools and techniques used by an HCO to incre.docx
Discuss the various means by which slaves resisted the slave system..docx
Discuss the various means by which slaves resisted the slave system..docx
Discuss the typica l clinical presentation of the diagnosis , Hip Os.docx
Discuss the typica l clinical presentation of the diagnosis , Hip Os.docx
Discuss the types of resources, tools, and methods that are availabl.docx
Discuss the types of resources, tools, and methods that are availabl.docx
Discuss the types of items that should be examined in a firewall log.docx
Discuss the types of items that should be examined in a firewall log.docx
Discuss the types of property, providing an example of each an.docx
Discuss the types of property, providing an example of each an.docx
Discuss the type of personality it takes to become a police officer..docx
Discuss the type of personality it takes to become a police officer..docx
Discuss the two major sources of crime statistics for the United Sta.docx
Discuss the two major sources of crime statistics for the United Sta.docx
Discuss the two most prominent theories related to the stage of adul.docx
Discuss the two most prominent theories related to the stage of adul.docx
Discuss the two elements required for the consent defense. In ad.docx
Discuss the two elements required for the consent defense. In ad.docx
Discuss the Truth in Lending Act and what role it places in financia.docx
Discuss the Truth in Lending Act and what role it places in financia.docx
Recently uploaded
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Answers to Home assignment on UV-Visible spectroscopy: Calculation of wavelength of UV-Visible absorption
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students mobility to the Czech Republic within eTwinning project "Medieval adventures with Marco Polo"
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of other biological materials, Ownership and period of protection
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is prepared for master's students (MIFB & MIBS) UUM. May it be useful to all.How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Recently uploaded (20)
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
This assignment is broken into three parts and you must comple.docx
- 1. This assignment is broken into three parts and you must complete each part of the assignment . Each part includes a text or video scenario to which you will respond by writing a 1–2 page paper for each scenario that examines specific information regarding the events using your knowledge of the United States Constitution. Part 1: Law Enforcement Officer Arrives at the Scene Scenario An 18-year-old high school student walks to class carrying a backpack. He is stopped by the school security guard and his backpack is searched. A loaded handgun is discovered. The school security guard takes the student to the principal’s office. The principal calls the local police. In the state where the school is located, it is illegal to carry a concealed weapon without a permit and all weapons are prohibited on campus. Officer Smith arrives at the school approximately 10 minutes later. Officer Smith takes a statement from the school security guard and searches the student’s backpack. He seizes the gun and places the student under arrest. Officer Smith then asks the student if he would like to make a statement to explain why he was carrying a concealed weapon on campus. The student replies, “What weapon? That’s not my backpack and I never saw that gun before.” The student is then transported to the local jail. However, on the way to the local jail, Officer Smith asks the student again
- 2. why he brought a loaded gun on campus. The student admits that it was his gun and stated that he needed it for protection. Upon arrival at the local jail, the student is booked. Six hours later, the student is interviewed by a Detective Columbo. The detective reads the student his Miranda warning and asks the student if he would like to make a statement. The student replies, “No, I want a lawyer.” Write a 1–2 page paper in which you: Examine the constitutional amendment or amendments that would relate to this situation. Outline the appropriate procedures you would need to follow to comply with the associated amendments to ensure admissibility of evidence. Evaluate the officer’s actions and determine whether his search, the student’s confession, and the weapon discovery were lawful and/or admissible. Provide a rationale for your opinion. Use at least two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. Part 2: Arrest and Trial Scenario Tyler, a well-known escort service provider in his community, is suspected of the murder of an escort who worked for him. The local police meet Tyler at the airport when he arrives from
- 3. a trip to Cancun. He is arrested for his suspected connection to the murder of the escort. The police do not inform Tyler of his right to remain silent or his right to counsel. They immediately begin to interrogate him. They continue to question him until he admits that he knew the prostitute and that she worked for him. He also admits that he was with her the night of the alleged murder. Tyler is transported to the local jail and booked. The prosecutor files charges of first degree murder against Tyler. Tyler does not waive his rights to a speedy trial. He asks that an attorney be appointed and demands a trial by jury. Write a 1–2 page paper in which you: Examine the constitutional amendment or amendments that would relate to this situation. Identify and discuss four elements of arrest. Describe the appropriate procedures to comply with Tyler’s rights to due process. Examine any consequences that might occur if his right to due process is violated. Use at least two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. Part 3: Correctional Officers and Rights of Inmates Hudson v. McMillian
- 4. is a U.S. Supreme court case involving the excessive force resulting in a claim of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. The court’s decision resulted in the five- pronged Hudson test, also known as PANAM: (P)erceived threat by correctional officers; (A)ny and all efforts to de-escalate; (N)eed for the application of force; (A)mount of force that was used and; (M)edical issues, and extent of any injuries, that are used to evaluate cases involving any use of force before trial and after conviction. The test helps the courts determine whether correctional officers’ actions were reasonable, necessary, and conducted in good faith. Watch the video scenario and take notes as you watch: CJ in Practice Constitutional Issue: Deprivation of Inmates’ Rights Write a 1–2 page paper in which you: Summarize the events of this scenario and the persons involved. Examine the constitutional amendments related to this situation and whether the rights of the inmates in this scenario were violated. Support your opinion.
- 5. Determine whether the incidents pass the five-pronged Hudson test discussed above. Recommend how the sergeant should respond to the officer's behavior. Support your response. Use at least two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment.