The document discusses corporate social responsibility (CSR) and debates around its implementation. It notes that while CSR programs aim to set examples for other businesses, some argue that companies have no moral obligation to engage in such activities. Additionally, CSR activities often involve costs that some believe could negatively impact profits. However, others counter that CSR can increase long-term profits and that stakeholders now prefer to invest in socially responsible companies. The document also examines arguments for and against CSR from different perspectives.

1. Thesis Statement On CSR
Introduction
This is a persuasive paper defining various business terms like corporate social responsibility and equal distribution of wealth. The thesis statement
does state that the CSR programs are applied in various developed organizations to set an example for small and rising enterprises whereas the anti
thesis statement is that there are no moral obligations felt by businesses to be involved in CSR. The financial aspect of CSR activities is also
discussed; at times it is thought that involvement of business in any environmental friendly work may lead to higher costs whereas an opposite point
of view is that CSR increases long run profit (Aras & Crowther, 2009). Now day's Triple bottom line concept is aligned with business which is another
...show more content...
The triple bottom line is used in business programs now days to make sure that businesses are more valuable, thus this is wrong to say that social
responsibility or moral courage are more present in businesses now days. This is the right time when CSR is discussed in companies, no matter it is
advertisement or production process CSR is considered important. This is another truth that stakeholders now want to invest in such companies only
which are having high social responsibility. This is the reason that famous brands such as Coca Cola is involved in educating plenty of children who
cannot afford education and Wal–Mart the best retail store of world is looking for such vendors who produce environment friendly product such as
energy saving bulbs and so on. In traditional business the term bottom line is used to express profit or loss, there are social judges present along with
environmentalist who are judging this bottom line and adding various aspects in it to improve business working, (Elkington, 1998) thus the triple
bottom line is not about profit and loss in monetary terms only but it is much more than that, this is more about health awareness of workers and
different healthy working aspects. If a firm is having good profit but workers here are dying because of unhealthy working conditions then this is not
an effective CSR firm as per environmentalist
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Research Paper on Csr
Individual Integrative Paper– ORGS 5100.3S A Critical Review of Corporate Social Responsibility– The Niger Delta Business Case Judith Idemudia
ABSTRACT This paper contains a critical review of the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which is one of strategy being adopted by
businesses to address some of the challenges they confront in their external environment. This paper examines various arguments from proponents and
critics of CSR. In addition, this paper examines the case of oil Multinational in Nigeria as way of ascertaining the validity of the different positions in
the CSR debate. IntroductionHistorical evidence suggests that societal concerns for businesses to have social obligations...show more content...
This widespread transmission of a corporation's misconduct will then have significant ramifications for their reputation and profitability. The
case of Shell in Ogoni (Niger Delta, Nigeria), the Brent Spar in the UK as well as Nike's sweatshop saga in Asia in the 1990s are good examples
of how the social conducts of a corporation can affect their reputation. However, the tension between CSR concepts and CSR practices remain and
this has led some to 3declare that there is a need for logic and empirical evidence to show the true cost and benefit of CSR for both business and
society (Devinney, 2009, 44). This paper attempts to contribute to the CSR debate by addressing the following questions: (1) To what extent has the
adoption of the CSR principles and practices resulted in positive outcomes for both oil MNCs and local communities in the Niger Delta area of
Nigeria? (2) What are the implications of the Nigerian case study for CSR theory from a developing country perspective? Before I begin to address
these questions, I will critically examine some of the arguments for and against CSR.
TheCSRDebate:ContrastingPerspectives(TheCSRProponents&Critics)Although there has been a lot of academic writing on Corporate Social
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Essay on Does CSR Work?
Does CSR Work?
Adam Smith founded the modern study of economics on the premise that all businesses are driven by the invisible hand to seek as much profit as
possible while society will take care of itself. However, as the public's opinion of big business has steadily declined in the recent decades, big business
has developed a social conscience to improve all aspects of society from worker compensation to protecting the environment to helping the needy. As
Stephen Cook indicates in the January 2003 edition of Management Today: "Everyone cares these days. You can hardly walk through the door of a
major company in the western world without tripping over stacks of glossy reports telling you how they care for the environment, their...show more
content...
Ruggie indicates that coke has spent $5 million a year to combat AIDS for African bottlers' employees. While hard numbers such as these bring the
consumer satisfaction while quelling the uproar of social activist groups, Cook indicates that many reports do not tell the whole truth. Cook cites
Craig Bennett of Friends of the Earth: "Oil companies are presenting themselves as solar companies, and companies that promote giant agribusiness
and oppose consumer information are claiming to be the solution to world hunger." While clever public relations and glossy reports may seem like
the easy way out, big companies are realizing more and more that hiding the truth isn't flying with the public anymore. The best example of public
dismay is Enron. Once a highly touted company, both on the business and CSR side, Enron has since collapsed in a massive scandal that has both
killed its reputation and its profits.
The main problem with certification is the lack of a standard. Gereffi et al. indicates four distinct categories of certification: first party, where the
company sets its own rules; second party, where an industry sets the certification rules; third party, where non–governmental organizations set the
certification rules; and fourth party, where the government sets the certification rules. The plethora of rule setting bodies has created general
disagreement as to the extent of a company must be socially
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Essay On Csr
Findings by (Shiqun 2014), states that some organisations identify CSR simply with a social denotation and strongly agree with the idea that they are
not charity organisations and as such should have no obligation to resolve problems in the society. Therefore, the social issues are the responsibility of
governments and not organisations. Referring to a quotation by (Solomon 1993) "there is a contradiction between an endogenous ability to profit and
the company's distribution to society". It is worth noting that CSR implementation and activities come with costs on it. The argument against the
implementation and practice of CSR by organisations most times points to the cost impact. CSR by an organisation will increase operating costs, which
...show more content...
Wal–Mart subjects its suppliers to strict regulations on product quality and employee working conditions, for example, which add production time
and increase overhead for the suppliers. Their competitors, meanwhile, can operate at lower costs and turn out products more quickly (Bizfluent
2017). The main reason why a business is created is to make a profit. Corporate social responsibility insists on a corporation to make an effort to
look out for stakeholders who are not shareholders only, but who have an interest on what an organization does and the outcomes of what it does.
Despite of that, it's not totally the duty of the organisation to look out for the many people who hold an interest in the work activities. In other
school of thought, it is acknowledged that some organisations are just not prepared to deal with social issues. The need for organisations to confront
societal issues needs the employees to be specifically trained and well knowledgeable about the issues at hand that the society and environment
faces, as this will give them the skills and the knowledge to be prepared to do so. In a nutshell, with the pros and cons of corporate social
responsibilities, it is imperative and beneficial for organisations to engage and embrace corporate social responsibilities (CSR). Organisations that are
socially responsible have better competitive advantages. Organisations involved with corporate social responsibilities are overall winners. CSR not
only makes an
Get more content on HelpWriting.net