SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
ENAC SSIE
/
Three dimensional hydrodynamic
modeling of Lake Geneva
Auteur André Michael
Encadrement Prof. Alfred Johny Wüest1 / Damien Bouffard1
Master 2013
1 Physics of Aquatic Systems Laboratory – Margaretha Kamprad Chair (APHYS)
Main goals
• Validate a 3D numerical simulation of Lake Geneva circulation and thermal structure both in stratified and unstratified period
• Provide a physical interpretation of the results, trying to identify the natural processes causing those results
Physical limnology of Lake Geneva
General circulation
Residual circulation
•Caused by long fetch winds (synoptic winds)
•Wind cause thermocline tilting => Oscillations +
Coriolis force = Cyclonic circulation
•Wind energy -> Potential energy -> Currents
Direct circulation
•Caused by thermal winds
•Wind energy -> Cyclonic currents (faster response)
•Constant currents (≠ residual circulation)
Density
stratification
Result of two
opposing force:
Solar radiation
(stabilizing force)
VS. Wind stress
(mixing force)
Lake Geneva winds
• Long fetch strong winds (Bise NE and Vent SW)
• Thermal winds (lake/land-breeze)
Methods
Model
• Delft3D used: A 3D hydrodynamic computational model
• Used on a curvilinear grid 500m X 500m, with 100
layers (Z-mode)
• Simulation time frame: 1st of March -> 30th of
December 2011.
• Calculation time step is 1 minute
• Meteorological data input: Wind speed and direction, air
temperature, relative humidity, cloud coverage and
solar radiations time series
• Simulations run with spatially homogenous and
heterogeneous winds
Meteorological data and observations
• Buchillon station: Water temperature at 1m and 36m, for the
whole simulation period
• Vidy bay: Currents speed and
direction over the whole
watercolumn and temperature at
bed (65m), for the last month of
simulation only
• SHL2: Monthly temperature
profile
Results
Thermal structure (heterogeneous winds)
Depth[m]
SHL2 Simulation J2
100 150 200 250 300 350
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
Temperature [°C]
5
10
15
20
Depth[m]
SHL2 Simulation J2
100 150 200 250 300 350
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
Temperature [°C]
5
10
15
20
t [Days]
Depth[m]
SHL2 Observations
100 150 200 250 300 350
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
Temperature [°C]
5
10
15
20
Circulation
5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
x 10
5 Spring depth averaged mean circulation
5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
x 10
5
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
x 10
5 Summer depth averaged mean circulation
5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
x 10
5
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
x 10
5 Fall depth averaged mean circulation
5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
x 10
5 December depth averaged circulation
5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
x 10
5
Spring depth averaged mean circulation
5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
x 10
5
Summer depthaveraged mean circulation
5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
x 10
5 Fall depth averaged mean circulation
5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
x 10
5 Winter depth averaged mean circulation
Homogenous wind simulations
Heterogeneous wind simulations
Physical interpretation
• Comparison between homogeneous and heterogeneous winds simulations => roles of long fetch winds and thermal winds in circulation
• Comparison between surface and depth averaged circulation => gyre are rather deep (direct circulation) or superficial (residual circulation)
Bise event
Lake
breeze
Conclusion
• Western anticyclonic gyre: Caused by long fetch winds, strengthened by thermal winds, superficial => Residual circulation
• Eastern cyclonic gyre: Spring and fall, disappeared in summer (patchy circulation), rotation sense inversion in winter under strong SW
winds, penetrates into epilimnion => direct circulation
• Divergence between model and observation at the end of the year: Observed thermocline rise while modeled thermocline get deeper
• Observed thermal structure interpolated from monthly temperature profile, and the last two profile were outliers => misinterpretations?
• Year 2011 unusual from meteorological point of view: shallower themocline at SHL2 since >10 years

More Related Content

Similar to Thesis Hydro Modeling POSTER

TC_climate_April2016
TC_climate_April2016TC_climate_April2016
TC_climate_April2016
Flora Viale
 
Inamdar_et_al_AIAA_2016
Inamdar_et_al_AIAA_2016Inamdar_et_al_AIAA_2016
Inamdar_et_al_AIAA_2016
Aniket Inamdar
 
Poster AGM 2016_PG_09_09_2016
Poster AGM 2016_PG_09_09_2016Poster AGM 2016_PG_09_09_2016
Poster AGM 2016_PG_09_09_2016
Poulomi Ganguli
 

Similar to Thesis Hydro Modeling POSTER (20)

TC_climate_April2016
TC_climate_April2016TC_climate_April2016
TC_climate_April2016
 
DSD-INT 2015 - The storm-surge modelling capabilities of D-Flow Flexible Mesh...
DSD-INT 2015 - The storm-surge modelling capabilities of D-Flow Flexible Mesh...DSD-INT 2015 - The storm-surge modelling capabilities of D-Flow Flexible Mesh...
DSD-INT 2015 - The storm-surge modelling capabilities of D-Flow Flexible Mesh...
 
Aus 151126 presentation fpa16_heat injury
Aus 151126 presentation fpa16_heat injuryAus 151126 presentation fpa16_heat injury
Aus 151126 presentation fpa16_heat injury
 
Inamdar_et_al_AIAA_2016
Inamdar_et_al_AIAA_2016Inamdar_et_al_AIAA_2016
Inamdar_et_al_AIAA_2016
 
Follow the steps of a meteorologist
Follow the steps of a meteorologistFollow the steps of a meteorologist
Follow the steps of a meteorologist
 
Fluid flow rate Experiment No. 5.pdf
Fluid flow rate Experiment No. 5.pdfFluid flow rate Experiment No. 5.pdf
Fluid flow rate Experiment No. 5.pdf
 
GROUNDWATER FLOW SIMULATION IN GUIMARAS ISLAND, PHILIPPINE
GROUNDWATER FLOW SIMULATION IN GUIMARAS ISLAND, PHILIPPINEGROUNDWATER FLOW SIMULATION IN GUIMARAS ISLAND, PHILIPPINE
GROUNDWATER FLOW SIMULATION IN GUIMARAS ISLAND, PHILIPPINE
 
Seismic Analysis of Elevated Water Tank
Seismic Analysis of Elevated Water TankSeismic Analysis of Elevated Water Tank
Seismic Analysis of Elevated Water Tank
 
Poster AGM 2016_PG_09_09_2016
Poster AGM 2016_PG_09_09_2016Poster AGM 2016_PG_09_09_2016
Poster AGM 2016_PG_09_09_2016
 
Msc Thesis Final1
Msc Thesis Final1Msc Thesis Final1
Msc Thesis Final1
 
Bi4301333340
Bi4301333340Bi4301333340
Bi4301333340
 
Thesis Presentation
Thesis PresentationThesis Presentation
Thesis Presentation
 
Phase change activity
Phase change activityPhase change activity
Phase change activity
 
Presentation of Refrigeration Simulation
Presentation of Refrigeration SimulationPresentation of Refrigeration Simulation
Presentation of Refrigeration Simulation
 
Meteorologist
MeteorologistMeteorologist
Meteorologist
 
forced heat convection | HEAT TRANSFER Laboratory
forced heat convection | HEAT TRANSFER Laboratoryforced heat convection | HEAT TRANSFER Laboratory
forced heat convection | HEAT TRANSFER Laboratory
 
River ice jams : risk evaluation, driving conditions and geomorphological imp...
River ice jams : risk evaluation, driving conditions and geomorphological imp...River ice jams : risk evaluation, driving conditions and geomorphological imp...
River ice jams : risk evaluation, driving conditions and geomorphological imp...
 
Harness-P.Balfour Final
Harness-P.Balfour FinalHarness-P.Balfour Final
Harness-P.Balfour Final
 
Dynamic mechanical analysis(DMA)
Dynamic mechanical analysis(DMA)Dynamic mechanical analysis(DMA)
Dynamic mechanical analysis(DMA)
 
Evaporation (1).ppt
Evaporation (1).pptEvaporation (1).ppt
Evaporation (1).ppt
 

Thesis Hydro Modeling POSTER

  • 1. ENAC SSIE / Three dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of Lake Geneva Auteur André Michael Encadrement Prof. Alfred Johny Wüest1 / Damien Bouffard1 Master 2013 1 Physics of Aquatic Systems Laboratory – Margaretha Kamprad Chair (APHYS) Main goals • Validate a 3D numerical simulation of Lake Geneva circulation and thermal structure both in stratified and unstratified period • Provide a physical interpretation of the results, trying to identify the natural processes causing those results Physical limnology of Lake Geneva General circulation Residual circulation •Caused by long fetch winds (synoptic winds) •Wind cause thermocline tilting => Oscillations + Coriolis force = Cyclonic circulation •Wind energy -> Potential energy -> Currents Direct circulation •Caused by thermal winds •Wind energy -> Cyclonic currents (faster response) •Constant currents (≠ residual circulation) Density stratification Result of two opposing force: Solar radiation (stabilizing force) VS. Wind stress (mixing force) Lake Geneva winds • Long fetch strong winds (Bise NE and Vent SW) • Thermal winds (lake/land-breeze) Methods Model • Delft3D used: A 3D hydrodynamic computational model • Used on a curvilinear grid 500m X 500m, with 100 layers (Z-mode) • Simulation time frame: 1st of March -> 30th of December 2011. • Calculation time step is 1 minute • Meteorological data input: Wind speed and direction, air temperature, relative humidity, cloud coverage and solar radiations time series • Simulations run with spatially homogenous and heterogeneous winds Meteorological data and observations • Buchillon station: Water temperature at 1m and 36m, for the whole simulation period • Vidy bay: Currents speed and direction over the whole watercolumn and temperature at bed (65m), for the last month of simulation only • SHL2: Monthly temperature profile Results Thermal structure (heterogeneous winds) Depth[m] SHL2 Simulation J2 100 150 200 250 300 350 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 Temperature [°C] 5 10 15 20 Depth[m] SHL2 Simulation J2 100 150 200 250 300 350 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 Temperature [°C] 5 10 15 20 t [Days] Depth[m] SHL2 Observations 100 150 200 250 300 350 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 Temperature [°C] 5 10 15 20 Circulation 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 x 10 5 Spring depth averaged mean circulation 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 x 10 5 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 x 10 5 Summer depth averaged mean circulation 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 x 10 5 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 x 10 5 Fall depth averaged mean circulation 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 x 10 5 December depth averaged circulation 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 x 10 5 Spring depth averaged mean circulation 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 x 10 5 Summer depthaveraged mean circulation 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 x 10 5 Fall depth averaged mean circulation 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 x 10 5 Winter depth averaged mean circulation Homogenous wind simulations Heterogeneous wind simulations Physical interpretation • Comparison between homogeneous and heterogeneous winds simulations => roles of long fetch winds and thermal winds in circulation • Comparison between surface and depth averaged circulation => gyre are rather deep (direct circulation) or superficial (residual circulation) Bise event Lake breeze Conclusion • Western anticyclonic gyre: Caused by long fetch winds, strengthened by thermal winds, superficial => Residual circulation • Eastern cyclonic gyre: Spring and fall, disappeared in summer (patchy circulation), rotation sense inversion in winter under strong SW winds, penetrates into epilimnion => direct circulation • Divergence between model and observation at the end of the year: Observed thermocline rise while modeled thermocline get deeper • Observed thermal structure interpolated from monthly temperature profile, and the last two profile were outliers => misinterpretations? • Year 2011 unusual from meteorological point of view: shallower themocline at SHL2 since >10 years