Describes the value of GrafMat in typical compound situation.

1. FiberGraf Materials
LLC.
Results of thermal behaviors study
January 2012
Note: Presentation Property of FiberGraf Materials LLC.

2. GrafMat
GrafMat is the primary material manufactured and distributed by
FiberGraf Materials Llc.. This material, engineered for composite
enhancement, is offered in particle sizes ranging from 5 to 250
microns and material densities from 1.76 to 2.0 g/cc. These
designations are average particle lengths in microns.
Note: Presentation Property of FiberGraf Materials LLC.

3. How it’s made
GrafMat is manufactured by encapsulating a
high grade carbon fiber in a proprietary resin
system, then heat treating. This process ensu
res the resulting product to have material de
nsities 1.76 g/cc to 2.0g/cc.
After several proprietary operations the billet
is then reduced and graded into particle size
s.
Custom particle sizes can be special ordered
to meet engineering needs.
Note: Presentation Property of FiberGraf Materials LLC.

4. This chart shows the behavioral effect of adding GrafMat
to a composite. The Z axis is drastically altered
effectively increasing the surface conductivity.
Note: Presentation Property of FiberGraf Materials LLC.

5. Sample A GrafMat Sample B Sample A / Sample B /
GrafMat GrafMat
FLIR images
This series provides visual evidence of the superior heat dissipation
at 90 seconds with GrafMat at a 400F heat indication
Note: Presentation Property of FiberGraf Materials LLC.

6. Cost in compound
Note: Presentation Property of FiberGraf Materials LLC.

7. Method and Conclusions
 All data collected from samples compounded at 40%
additive to 60% nylon 66.
 Subjects A & B are two of the industries leading
carbon fiber thermal additives at 200 microns in
length
 This evaluation was conducted by applying a 400F
heat source directly to sample and tracking heat flow
over 10 minutes in X,Y and Z axis.
 Real world testing has proven thermal benefit from
the addition of GrafMat.
 An obvious reduction in directionality is noticed in
both chart form and image.
 Competition cost for sample A@ $29lb and sample
B@ $80lb GrafMat@ $13lb in production volumes

8. This evaluation shows the behaviors of three loading
options compared to commercially available compounds for
thermal conductivity. Again providing superior Z axis
conductivity.
Note: Presentation Property of FiberGraf Materials LLC.

9. Method and Conclusions
 Data collected in this experiment is
designed to compare two leading
compounds for the molding industry to
three loading options with GrafMat.
 The polymer used in this test is PPS.
 This evaluation temperature was 450F
 Medium to large particle GrafMat
compounded exhibits superior behavior in
the Z axis than industry standard material

10. GrafMat
Providing a superior material in industrial volume
FiberGraf Materials LLC.
4421 Dockray Dr.
Nashport, Oh 43830
740-408-6564
Note: Presentation Property of FiberGraf Materials LLC.