SlideShare a Scribd company logo
THE
OBESITYCODE
UNLOCKINGTH
ESECRETSOF
WEIGHTLOSS
JASONFUNG,MD
Thisbookisdedi
cated to
mybeautifulwife
,Mina.
Thank you for
yourloveand
thestrengthyougive
me.Icouldnotdoitwi
thoutyou,norwould
Ieverwantto.
FOREWORD
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
PART1:TheEpidemic
CHAPTER1:HowObesityBecameanEpidemic
CHAPTER2:InheritingObesity
PART2:
TheCalorieDeceptionCHAPTER3:TheCalo
rie-ReductionErrorCHAPTER4:
TheExerciseMythCHAPTER5:TheOverfee
dingParadox
PART3:ANewModelofObesity
CHAPTER6:ANewHope
CHAPTER7:InsulinCHAPTER
8:Cortisol
CHAPTER 9: The Atkins
OnslaughtCHAPTER10:InsulinResistance:Th
eMajorPlayer
PART 4: The Social Phenomenon of
ObesityCHAPTER 11: Big Food, More Food
and theNewScienceofDiabesity
CHAPTER12:PovertyandObesity
CHAPTER13:ChildhoodObesity
PART 5: What’s Wrong with Our
Diet?CHAPTER14:TheDeadlyEffectsofFructose
CHAPTER 15: The Diet Soda
DelusionCHAPTER16:CarbohydratesandProtect
iveFiber
CHAPTER17:ProteinCHAPTE
R18:FatPhobia
PART 6: The
SolutionCHAPTER19:Whatto
EatCHAPTER20:WhentoEat
APPENDIXA:SampleMealPlans(withFastingProto
cols)
APPENDIXB:Fasting:APracticalGuide
APPENDIXC:MeditationandSleepHygieneto
ReduceCortisol
ENDNOTESINDE
X
FOREWORD
DR. JASON FUNG IS a
Torontophysician specializing in the
care ofpatients with kidney diseases.
His keyresponsibility is to oversee the
complexmanagement of patients with
end-stagekidney disease requiring renal
(kidney)dialysis.
His credentials do not
obviouslyexplain why he should author
a
booktitledTheObesityCodeorwhyheblog
son the intensive dietary management
ofobesityandtype2diabetesmellitus.Toun
derstand this apparent anomaly, weneed
first to appreciate who this man
isandwhatmakeshimsounusual.
Intreatingpatientswithend-stage
kidney disease, Dr. Fung learned
twokey lessons. First, that type 2
diabetes isthe single commonest cause
of kidneyfailure. Second, that renal
dialysis,however sophisticated and
even
lifeprolonging,treatsonlythefinalsympto
ms of an underlying disease
thathasbeenpresentfortwenty,thirty,forty
or perhaps even fifty years. Gradually,
itdawned on Dr. Fung that he
waspracticing medicine exactly as he
hadbeen taught: by reactively treating
thesymptoms of complex diseases
withoutfirst trying to understand or
correct theirrootcauses.
He realized that to make a
differencetohispatients,hewouldhavetos
tartbyacknowledgingabittertruth:thatour
venerated profession is no
longerinterested in addressing the
causes ofdisease.
Instead,itwastesmuchofitstime and
many of its
resourcesattemptingtotreatsymptoms.
He resolved to make a real
differenceto his patients (and his
profession)
bystrivingtounderstandthetruecausesthatu
nderliedisease.
Before December 2014, I
wasunaware of Dr. Jason Fung’s
existence.Then one day I chanced upon
his twolectures—
“TheTwoBigLiesofType2Diabetes” and
“How to Reverse Type
2DiabetesNaturally”—
onYouTube.Assomeone
withaspecialinterestintype 2diabetes,
not least because I have
theconditionmyself,Iwasnaturally
intrigued. Who, I thought, is this
brightyoung man? What gives him the
certaintythat type 2 diabetes can be
reversed“naturally”?And
howcanhebebraveenough to accuse his
noble profession oflying? He will need
to present a goodargument,Ithought.
It took only a few minutes to
realizethat Dr. Fung is not only
legitimate, butalso more than able to
look after himselfin any medical scrap.
The argument hepresented was one that
had
beenbouncingaround,unresolved,inmyo
wnmind for at least three years. But I
hadnever been able to see it with the
sameclarity or to explain it with the
sameemphaticsimplicityashadDr.Fung.B
ytheendofhistwolectures,IknewthatI
had observed a young master at
work.Finally,IunderstoodwhatIhadmissed
.
What Dr. Fung achieved in those
twolectures was to utterly destroy
thecurrentlypopularmodelforthemedical
management of type 2 diabetes—
themodelmandatedbyallthedifferentdiab
etes associations around the
world.Worse,heexplainedwhythiserrone
ousmodel of treatment must inevitably
harmthehealthofallpatientsunfortunateen
oughtoreceive it.
According to Dr. Fung, the first big
liein the management of type 2 diabetes
isthe claim that it is a
chronicallyprogressive disease that
simply getsworse with time, even in
those
whocomplywiththebesttreatmentsmoder
n
medicineoffers.But,Dr.Fungargues,this
is simply not true. Fifty percent
ofthepatientsonDr.Fung’sIntensiveDiet
ary Management (IDM) program,which
combines dietary
carbohydraterestriction and fasting,
are able to
stopusinginsulinafterafewmonths.
Sowhyareweunabletoacknowledge
the truth? Dr.
Fung’sanswerissimple:wedoctorslietoou
rselves. If type 2 diabetes is a
curabledisease but all our patients are
gettingworse on the treatments we
prescribe,then we must be bad doctors.
And
sincewedidnotstudyforsolongatsuchgreat
cost to become bad doctors, this
failurecannot be our fault. Instead, we
mustbelievewearedoingthebestforour
patients, who must unfortunately
besuffering from a chronically
progressiveand incurable disease. It is
not adeliberate lie, Dr. Fung concludes,
butone of cognitive dissonance—
theinabilityto
acceptablatanttruthbecauseaccepting it
would be too emotionallydevastating.
Thesecondlie,accordingtoDr.Fung,is
our belief that type 2 diabetes is
adiseaseofabnormalbloodglucoselevels
for which the only correcttreatment is
progressively increasinginsulin dosages.
He argues, instead, thattype 2 diabetes is
a disease of insulinresistance with
excessive insulinsecretion—
incontrasttotype
1diabetes,aconditionoftrueinsulinlack.
To treat
How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you
want to learn this special method than click here
bothconditionsthesameway—
byinjectinginsulin—
makesnosense.Whytreat a condition of
insulin excess withyet more insulin, he
asks? That is
theequivalentofprescribingalcoholforthet
reatmentofalcoholism.
Dr.Fung’snovelcontributionishisinsight
that treatment in type 2
diabetesfocusesonthesymptomofthediseas
e—anelevatedblood
glucoseconcentration
—rather than its root cause,
insulinresistance. And the initial
treatment forinsulin resistance is to
limitcarbohydrate intake. Understanding
thissimple biology explains why
thisdiseasemaybereversibleinsomecases
—and, conversely, why the
moderntreatmentoftype2diabetes,whichd
oes
notlimitcarbohydrateintake,worsensth
eoutcome.
But how did Dr. Fung arrive at
theseoutrageous conclusions? And how
didtheyleadtohisauthorshipofthisbook?
In addition to his
realization,described above, of the long-
term natureof disease and the illogic of
treating
adisease’ssymptomsratherthanremovingit
s cause, he also, almost by chance, inthe
early 2000s, became aware of
thegrowingliteratureonthebenefitsof
low-carbohydrate diets in those
withobesity and other conditions of
insulinresistance. Taught to believe
that acarbohydrate-restricted, high-fat
dietkills, he was shocked to discover
theopposite:thisdietarychoiceproduces
a
range of highly beneficial
metabolicoutcomes,
especiallyinthosewiththeworstinsulinresi
stance.
Andfinallycamethecherryonthetop
—a legion of hidden studies
showingthat for the reduction of body
weight inthose with obesity (and
insulinresistance), this high-fat diet is
at leastas effective, and usually much
more
so,thanothermoreconventionaldiets.
Eventually, he could bear it no
longer.Ifeveryoneknows(butwon’tadmit)
thatthe low-fat calorie-restricted diet
isutterly ineffective in controlling
bodyweight or in treating obesity, surely
it istime to tell the truth: the best hope
fortreating andpreventing
obesity,adisease ofinsulinresistanceand
excessiveinsulinproduction,mustsurely
be the same low-carbohydrate,high-fat
diet used for the management ofthe
ultimate disease of insulin
resistance,type 2 diabetes. And so this
book wasborn.
In The Obesity Code, Dr. Fung
hasproduced perhaps the most
importantpopularbookyetpublishedonthis
topicofobesity.
Its strengths are that it is based on
anirrefutable biology, the evidence
forwhich is carefully presented; and it
iswrittenwiththeeaseandconfidenceofam
aster communicator in an
accessible,well-reasoned sequence so
that itsconsecutive chapters
systematicallydevelop,layerbylayer,ane
vidence-
based biological model of obesity
thatmakes complete sense in its
logicalsimplicity. It includes just
enoughscience to convince the
skepticalscientist,butnotsomuchthatitcon
fusesthosewithoutabackgroundinbiology.
This feat in itself is a
stunningachievementthatfewscience
writerseveraccomplish.
Bytheendofthebook,thecarefulreader
will understand exactly
thecausesoftheobesityepidemic,
whyourattempts to prevent both the
obesity anddiabetes epidemics were
bound to fail,and what, more
importantly, are thesimple steps that
those with a weightproblem need to
take to reverse theirobesity.
The solution needed is that which
Dr.Fung has now provided: “Obesity
is... amultifactorial disease. What we
need isa framework, a structure, a
coherenttheorytounderstandhowallitsfact
orsfit together. Too often, our current
modelof obesity assumes that there is
only onesingle true cause, and that all
others
arepretenderstothethrone.Endlessdebate
sensue...Theyare allpartiallycorrect.”
In providing one such
coherentframework that can account for
most ofwhat we currently know about
the realcauses of obesity, Dr. Fung has
providedmuch,muchmore.
Hehasprovidedablueprintfortherev
ersal of the greatest
medicalepidemicsfacingmodernsocie
ty—
epidemics that he shows are
entirelypreventableandpotentiallyrever
sible,but only if we truly understand
theirbiological causes—not just
theirsymptoms.
The truth he expresses will one day
beacknowledgedas self-evident.
Thesoonerthatdaydawns,thebetterforus
all.
TIMOTHYNOAKESOMS,MBChB,MD,DSc,PhD
(hc), FACSM, (hon) FFSEM (UK),
(hon)FSEM(Ire)
EMERITUSPROFESSOR
UNIVERSITYOFCAPETOWN,CapeTown,
SouthAfrica
INTRODUCTION
THE ART OF medicine is quite
peculiar.Onceinawhile,medicaltreatm
entsbecome established that don’t
reallywork.Throughsheerinertia,theset
reatments get handed down from
onegeneration of doctors to the next
andsurvive for a surprisingly long
time,despitetheirlackofeffectiveness.
Consider the medicinal use of
leeches(bleeding)or,say,routinetonsillec
tomy.
Unfortunately, the treatment of
obesityis also one such example. Obesity
isdefinedintermsofaperson’sbodymassind
ex,calculatedasaperson’sweightinkilogra
ms divided by the square of
theirheightinmeters.Abodymassindex
greater than 30 is defined as obese.
Formore than thirty years, doctors
haverecommendedalow-fat,calorie-
reduceddiet as the treatment of choice
forobesity. Yet the obesity
epidemicaccelerates. From 1985 to
2011, theprevalence of obesity in
Canada tripled,from 6 percent to 18
percent.1Thisphenomenonisnotuniqueto
NorthAmerica, but involves most of
thenationsofthe world.
Virtually every person who has
usedcaloric reduction for weight loss
hasfailed.And,really,whohasn’ttriedit?
By every objective measure,
thistreatment is completely and
utterlyineffective.Yetitremainsthetreat
mentofchoice,defendedvigorouslyby
nutritionalauthorities.
As a nephrologist, I specialize
inkidney disease, the most common
causeof which is type 2 diabetes with
itsassociated obesity. I’ve often
watchedpatients start insulin treatment
for theirdiabetes, knowing that most will
gainweight. Patients are rightly
concerned.“Doctor,”theysay,“you’vealw
aystoldmetoloseweight.Buttheinsulinyou
gavememakesmegainsomuchweight.How
isthishelpful?”Foralongtime,Ididn’thave
agoodanswerforthem.
Thatnagginguneasegrew.Likemanydoc
tors, I believed that weight gain wasa
caloric imbalance—eating too muchand
movingtoo little.
Butifthatwereso,whydidthemedicationIp
rescribed—
insulin—cause such relentless
weightgain?
Everybody, health professionals
andpatients alike, understood that the
rootcause of type 2 diabetes lay in
weightgain. There were rare cases of
highlymotivated patients who had
lostsignificantamountsofweight.Theirtyp
e2 diabeteswouldalsoreversecourse.
Logically, since weight was
theunderlying problem, it
deservedsignificant attention. Still, it
seemed thatthe health profession was
not even theleast bit interested in
treating it. I
wasguiltyascharged.Despitehavingworke
d for more than twenty years
inmedicine,Ifoundthatmyownnutritionalk
nowledgewasrudimentary,atbest.
Do you want to loss your weight
without any exercise than click here
Treatment of this terrible disease—
obesity—was left to large
corporationslikeWeightWatchers,aswell
asvarioushucksters and charlatans
mostlyinterested in peddling the latest
weight-loss “miracle.” Doctors were
not evenremotely interested in nutrition.
Instead,the medical profession seemed
obsessedwith finding and prescribing
the nextnewdrug:
Youhavetype2diabetes?Here,letme
giveyoua pill.
You have high blood
pressure?Here,letmegiveyoua
pill.
You have high cholesterol?
Here,letme give youa pill.
Youhavekidneydisease?Here,let
megiveyoua pill.
But all along, we needed to
treatobesity. We were trying to treat
theproblems caused by obesity rather
thanobesity itself. In trying to
understand theunderlying cause of
obesity, I eventuallyestablished the
Intensive
DietaryManagementClinicinToronto,Ca
nada.
The conventional view of obesity as
acaloricimbalancedidnotmakesense.
Caloric reduction had been
prescribedfor the last fifty years with
startlingineffectiveness.
Reading books on nutrition was
nohelp. That was mostly a game of
“hesaid, she said,” with many
quoting“authoritative”doctors.Forex
ample,
Dr. Dean Ornish says that dietary fat
isbadandcarbohydratesaregood.Heisares
pected doctor, so we should listen tohim.
But Dr. Robert Atkins said
dietaryfatisgoodandcarbohydratesarebad.
Hewasalso arespecteddoctor, so
weshouldlistentohim.Whoisright?Whois
wrong? In the science of nutrition,there
is rarely any consensus aboutanything:
Dietaryfatisbad.No,dietaryfatisgood
. There are good fats and badfats.
Carbohydrates are bad.
No,carbohydratesaregood.Therea
regoodcarbsandbadcarbs.
Youshouldeatmoremealsaday.
No, you should eat fewer meals
aday.
Countyourcalories.No,caloriesd
on’tcount.
Milk is good for you. No, milk
isbadforyou.
Meatisgoodforyou.No,meatisbad
foryou.
Todiscovertheanswers,weneedtotur
n to evidence-based medicine
ratherthanvagueopinion.
Literally thousands of books
aredevoted to dieting and weight
loss,usually written by doctors,
nutritionists,personal trainers and other
“healthexperts.” However, with a
fewexceptions,rarelyismore thana
cursory
thoughtsparedfortheactualcausesofobe
sity.Whatmakesusgainweight?
Whydowegetfat?
Themajorproblemisthecompletelack
of a theoretical framework
forunderstanding obesity. Current
theoriesare
ridiculouslysimplistic,oftentakingonlyo
nefactorintoaccount:
Excesscaloriescauseobesity.E
xcess carbohydrates
causeobesity.
Excess meat consumption
causesobesity.
Excess dietary fat causes
obesity.Toolittleexercisecausesobe
sity.
Butallchronicdiseasesare
multifactorial, and these factors are
notmutually exclusive. They may
allcontribute to varying degrees.
Forexample, heart disease has
numerouscontributing factors—family
history,gender, smoking, diabetes,
highcholesterol, high blood pressure and
alack of physical activity, to name only
afew—
andthatfactiswellaccepted.Butsuchisnott
hecase inobesityresearch.
Theothermajorbarriertounderstanding
is the focus on short-termstudies.
Obesity usually takes decades tofully
develop. Yet we often rely
oninformation about it from studies that
areonly of several weeks’ duration. If
westudyhowrustdevelops,wewouldneedt
oobservemetaloveraperiodofweeks
tomonths,nothours.Obesity,similarly,is a
long-term disease. Short-
termstudiesmaynotbeinformative.
While I understand that the research
isnot always conclusive, I hope this
book,which draws on what I’ve learned
overtwenty years of helping patients
withtype 2 diabetes lose weight
permanentlyto manage their disease,
will provide astructuretobuildupon.
Evidence-based medicine does
notmean taking every piece of low-
qualityevidence at face value. I often
readstatements such as “low-fat diets
provento completely reverse heart
disease.”The reference will be a study
of fiverats. That hardly qualifies as
evidence.
Iwillreferenceonlystudiesdoneon
humans, and mostly only those that
havebeen published in high-quality,
peer-reviewed journals. No animal
studieswill be discussed in this book.
Thereason for this decision can
beillustratedin“TheParableoftheCow”:
Two cows were discussing the
latestnutritional research, which had
beendoneonlions.Onecowsaystotheother,
“Did you hear that we’ve been
wrongthese last 200 years? The latest
researchshows that eating grass is bad
for
youandeatingmeatisgood.”Sothetwocow
s began eating meat.
Shortlyafterward,theygotsickandtheydie
d.
One year later, two lions
werediscussing the latest nutritional
research,whichwasdoneoncows.Onelions
aid
to the other that the latest
researchshowed that eating meat kills
you andeating grass is good. So, the
two
lionsstartedeatinggrass,andtheydied.
What’s the moral of the story? We
arenot mice. We are not rats. We are
notchimpanzeesorspidermonkeys.Wear
ehumanbeings,andthereforeweshouldco
nsider only human studies. I
aminterested in obesity in humans,
notobesity in mice. As much as
possible,
Itrytofocusoncausalfactorsratherthanass
ociation studies. It is dangerous
toassume that because two factors
areassociated,oneisthecauseoftheother.
Witness the hormone
replacementtherapy disaster in post-
menopausalwomen.Hormonereplaceme
nttherapy
How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you
want to learn this special method than click here
wasassociatedwithlowerheartdisease,bu
tthatdidnotmeanthatitwasthecauseoflow
erheartdisease.
However, in nutritional research, it
isnotalwayspossibletoavoidassociationst
udies, as they are often the
bestavailableevidence.
Part 1 of this book, “The
Epidemic,”explores the timeline of the
obesityepidemic and the contribution of
thepatient’sfamilyhistory,andshowshowbo
thshedlightontheunderlyingcauses.
Part 2, “The Calorie
Deception,”reviews the current
caloric theory indepth, including
exercise
andoverfeedingstudies.Theshortcomin
gsof the current understanding of
obesityarehighlighted.
Part 3, “A New Model of
Obesity,”introducesthehormonaltheoryo
fobesity, a robust explanation of
obesityas a medical problem. These
chaptersexplain the central role of
insulin
inregulatingbodyweightanddescribethev
itally important role of
insulinresistance.
Part 4, “The Social Phenomenon
ofObesity,” considers how
hormonalobesity theory explains some
of
theassociationsofobesity.Whyisobesity
associated with poverty? What can
wedoaboutchildhoodobesity?
Part 5, “What’s Wrong with
OurDiet?,”explorestheroleoffat,protein
and carbohydrates, the
threemacronutrients,inweightgain.In
addition, we examine one of the
mainculprits in weight gain—
fructose—
andtheeffectsofartificialsweeteners.
Part 6, “The Solution,”
providesguidelines for lasting treatment
ofobesity by addressing the
hormonalimbalance of high blood
insulin. Dietaryguidelines for reducing
insulin levelsinclude reducing added
sugar andrefined grains, keeping
proteinconsumption moderate, and
addinghealthy fat and fiber. Intermittent
fastingis an effective way to treat
insulinresistance without incurring the
negativeeffects of calorie reduction
diets. Stressmanagement and sleep
improvement
canreducecortisollevelsandcontrolinsuli
n.
The Obesity Code will set forth
aframework for understanding
thecondition of human obesity.
Whileobesity shares many
importantsimilarities and differences
with type 2diabetes,this is
primarilyabookaboutobesity.
The process of challenging
currentnutritional dogma is, at times,
unsettling,butthehealthconsequencesaret
ooimportant to ignore. What
actuallycauses weight gain and what
can we doabout it? This question is the
overalltheme of this book. A fresh
frameworkfortheunderstandingandtreatm
entofobesity represents a new hope for
ahealthierfuture.
JASONFUNG,MD
PART
ONE
TheEpidemic
(1)
HOWOBESITY
BECAMEANEPIDEMIC
Ofalltheparasitesthataf
fecthumanity,Idonotkn
owof,norcanIimagine,
anymoredistressingtha
nthatofObesity.
WILLIAMBANTING
HERE’S THE QUESTIONthat has
alwaysbotheredme:Whyaretheredoctors
whoare fat? Accepted as authorities
inhumanphysiology,doctorsshouldbetrue
expertsonthecausesandtreatmentsof
obesity. Most doctors are also
veryhardworking and self-disciplined.
Sincenobodywantstobefat,doctorsin
particular should have both
theknowledge and the dedication to
staythinandhealthy.
Sowhyaretherefatdoctors?
The standard prescription for
weightlossis“EatLess,MoveMore.”Itsou
nds perfectly reasonable. But
whydoesn’titwork?Perhapspeoplewanti
ngto lose weight are not following
thisadvice.Themindiswilling,buttheflesh
is weak. Yet consider the self-
disciplineand dedication needed to
complete anundergraduate degree,
medical
school,internship,residencyandfellowshi
p.Itis hardly conceivable that
overweightdoctors simply lack the
willpower tofollowtheirownadvice.
Thisleavesthepossibilitythatthe
conventional advice is simply
wrong.And if it is, then our entire
understandingofobesityisfundamentallyf
lawed.
Given the current epidemic of obesity,
Isuspect that such is the most
likelyscenario. So we need to start at the
verybeginning, with a thorough
understandingofthediseasethatishumanob
esity.
Wemuststartwiththesinglemostimport
antquestionregardingobesityoranydisea
se:“Whatcausesit?”Wespend no time
considering this crucialquestion
because we think we alreadyknow the
answer. It seems so obvious:it’s a
matter of Calories In
versusCaloriesOut.
Acalorieisaunitoffood
energyusedbythebodyforvariousfunctions
suchas
breathing,buildingnewmuscleandbone,
pumping blood and othermetabolic
tasks. Some food energy isstored as fat.
Calories In is the foodenergy that we
eat. Calories Out is
theenergyexpendedforallofthesevarious
metabolicfunctions.
Whenthenumberofcalorieswetakein
exceeds the number of calories weburn,
weight gain results, we say. Eatingtoo
much and exercising too little
causesweight gain, we say. Eating too
manycaloriescausesweightgain,wesay.
These “truths” seem so self-evident
thatwe do not question whether they
areactuallytrue.Butarethey?
PROXIMATEVERSUSULTIMATECA
USE
EXCESS CALORIES MAY certainly be
theproximatecauseofweightgain,butnot
itsultimatecause.
What’s the difference
betweenproximateandultimate?Theprox
imatecauseisimmediatelyresponsible,w
hereas the ultimate cause is
whatstartedthechainofevents.
Consider alcoholism. What
causesalcoholism? The proximate
cause is“drinkingtoomuchalcohol”—
whichisundeniably true, but not
particularlyuseful.Thequestionandthecau
sehereareoneandthesame,sincealcoholis
mmeans “drinking too much
alcohol.”Treatmentadvicedirectedagain
stthe
proximate cause—“Stop drinking
somuchalcohol”—isnotuseful.
Thecrucialquestion,theonethatweare
really interested in, is: What is
theultimate cause of why
alcoholismoccurs.Theultimatecauseincl
udes
the addictive nature of
alcohol,anyfamilyhistoryofalcoh
olism,excessive stress in the
homesituationand/or
anaddictive personality.
There we have the real disease,
andtreatment must be directed against
theultimate,ratherthantheproximatecause.
Understandingtheultimatecauseleadstoeff
ectivetreatmentssuchas(inthis
Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise
than click here
case) rehabilitation and social
supportnetworks.
Let’stakeanotherexample.Whydoesa
plane crash? The proximate cause
is,“there was not enough lift to
overcomegravity”—again, absolutely
true, but notin any way useful. The
ultimate causemightbe
human
error,mechanical fault
and/orinclementweathe
r.
Understandingtheultimatecauseleads
to effective solutions such asbetter
pilot training or tightermaintenance
schedules. Advice
to“generatemoreliftthangravity”(larger
wings,morepowerfulengines)willnotre
duce plane crashes.
This understanding applies
toeverything. For instance, why is it so
hotinthisroom?
PROXIMATE CAUSE: Heat
energycominginisgreaterthanheatener
gyleaving.
SOLUTION: Turn on the fans to
increasetheamountofheatleaving.
ULTIMATECAUSE:Thethermostatissettoo
high.
SOLUTION: Turn down the
thermostat.Whyistheboatsinking?
PROXIMATE CAUSE: Gravity is
strongerthanbuoyancy.
SOLUTION:Reducegravitybylig
hteningtheboat.
ULTIMATECAUSE:Theboathasalargeholei
nthehull.
SOLUTION:Patchthehole.
In each case, the solution to
theproximate cause of the problem
isneitherlastingnormeaningful.Bycontras
t,treatmentoftheultimatecauseisfarmore
successful.
Thesameappliestoobesity:Whatca
usesweightgain?
Proximatecause:Consumingmorecalori
es thanyouexpend.
If more calories in than out is
theproximatecause,theunspokenanswerto
that last question is that the
ultimatecause is “personal choice.” We
chooseto eat chips instead of broccoli.
WechoosetowatchTVinsteadofexercise.
Through this reasoning, obesity
istransformed from a disease that needs
tobe investigated and understood into
apersonal failing,acharacter defect.
Insteadofsearchingfortheultimatecau
se of obesity, we transform
theprobleminto
eating too much (gluttony)
and/orexercisingtoolittle(sloth).
Gluttony and sloth are two of
theseven deadly sins. So we say of
theobese that they “brought it
onthemselves.” They “let themselves
go.”It gives us the comforting illusion
thatwe understand ultimate cause of
theproblem.Ina2012onlinepoll,161
percent of U.S. adults believed
that“personal choices about eating
andexercise” were responsible
fortheobesity epidemic. So we
discriminateagainstpeoplewhoareobese
.Webothpityandloathethem.
However, on simple reflection,
thisidea simply cannot be true. Prior
topuberty,boysandgirlsaveragethesame
body-fat percentage. After
puberty,women on average carry close
to 50percent more body fat than men.
Thischange occurs despite the fact that
menconsume more calories on average
thanwomen.Butwhyis thistrue?
What is the ultimate cause? It
hasnothingtodowithpersonalchoices.Itisn
otacharacterdefect.Womenarenot
moregluttonousorlazierthanmen.Thehorm
onal cocktail that differentiates menand
women must make it more likely
thatwomen will accumulate excess
caloriesasfatasopposedtoburningthemoff.
Pregnancy also induces
significantweightgain.Whatistheultimatec
ause?Again, it is obviously the
hormonalchangesresultingfromthepregnan
cy
—not personal choice—that
encouragesweightgain.
Having erred in understanding
theproximate and ultimate causes,
webelievethesolutiontoobesityis
toeatfewercalories.
The“authorities”allagree.TheU.S.Dep
artment of Agriculture’s
DietaryGuidelinesforAmericans,updated
in
2010, forcefully proclaims its
keyrecommendation:“Controltotalcalo
rieintaketomanagebodyweight.”TheCen
ters for Disease
Control2exhortpatients to balance
their calories.
TheadvicefromtheNationalInstitutesof
Health’s pamphlet “Aim for a
HealthyWeight”is“tocutdownonthenum
berof calories... they get from food
andbeverages and increase their
physicalactivity.”3
Allthisadviceformsthefamous“EatLe
ss, Move More” strategy so belovedby
obesity “experts.” But here’s apeculiar
thought: If we alreadyunderstand what
causes obesity, how totreat it, and
we’ve spent millions
ofdollarsoneducationandobesity
programs,why arewe gettingfatter?
ANATOMYOFANEPIDEMIC
WEWEREN’TALWAYSsoobsessedwithcalorie
s. Throughout most of
humanhistory,obesityhasbeenrare.
Individuals in traditional societies
eatingtraditional diets seldom became
obese,even in times of abundant food.
Ascivilizationsdeveloped,obesityfollow
ed. Speculating on the cause,many
identified the
refinedcarbohydratesofsugarandstarches
.
Sometimes considered the father of
thelow- carbohydrate diet, Jean
AnthelmeBrillat-Savarin (1755–1826)
wrote theinfluential textbook The
Physiology ofTaste in 1825. There he
wrote: “Thesecond of the chief causes
of obesity
istheflouryandstarchysubstanceswhich
manmakestheprimeingredientsofhisdaily
nourishment. As we have saidalready,
all animals that live onfarinaceous food
grow fat willy-
nilly;andmanisnoexceptiontotheuniversa
llaw.”4
All foods can be divided into
threedifferent macronutrient groups:
fat,protein and carbohydrates. The
“macro”in“macronutrients”referstothefa
ctthatthebulkofthefoodweeatismadeupoft
hese three groups.
Micronutrients,which make up a very
small proportionof the food, include
vitamins
andmineralssuchasvitaminsA,B,C,D,Ean
d K, as well as minerals such as
ironandcalcium.Starchyfoodsandsugarsa
re allcarbohydrates.
Severaldecadeslater,WilliamBanting
(1796–1878), an Englishundertaker,
rediscovered the
fatteningpropertiesoftherefinedcarbohyd
rate.In1863,hepublishedthepamphletLett
eron Corpulence, Addressed to
thePublic, which is often considered
theworld’s first diet book. His story
israther unremarkable. He was not
anobese child, nor did he have a
familyhistory of obesity. In his mid-
thirties,however, he started to gain
weight. Notmuch; perhaps a pound or
two per year.By age sixty-two, he stood
five foot
fiveandweighed202pounds(92kilograms
).Perhaps unremarkable by
modernstandards, he was considered
quiteportlyatthetime.Distressed,hesought
How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you
want to learn this special method than click here
adviceonweightlossfromhisph
ysicians.
First,hetriedtoeatless,butthatonlyleft
him hungry. Worse, he failed to
loseweight. Next, he increased his
exerciseby rowing along the River
Thames,
nearhishomeinLondon.Whilehisphysicalf
itness improved, he developed
a“prodigious appetite, which I
wascompelled to indulge.”5Still, he
failedtolose weight.
Finally,ontheadviceofhissurgeon,Banti
ngtriedanewapproach.Withtheideathatsug
aryand starchyfoodswerefattening, he
strenuously avoided
allbreads,milk,beer,sweetsandpotatoesth
at had previously made up a
largeportionofhis diet.(Todaywewould
call this diet low in
refinedcarbohydrates.) William Banting
notonly lost the weight and kept it off,
buthe also felt so well that he
wascompelledtowritehisfamouspamphle
t.Weight gain, he believed, resulted
fromeating too many
“fatteningcarbohydrates.”
Formostofthenextcentury,diets lowin
refined carbohydrates were acceptedas
the standard treatment for obesity.
Bythe 1950s, it was fairly standard
advice.If you were to ask your
grandparentswhat caused obesity, they
would not talkabout calories. Instead,
they would tellyou to stop eating sugary
and starchyfoods. Common sense and
empiricobservationservedtoconfirmthetr
uth.
Nutritional“experts”andgovernmento
pinionwere notneeded.
Caloriecountinghadbegunintheearly
1900s with the book Eat Your Wayto
Health, written by Dr. Robert
HughRose as a “scientific system of
weightcontrol.” That book was
followed up in1918 with the bestseller
Diet
andHealth,withKeytotheCalories,writte
n by Dr. Lulu Hunt Peters, anAmerican
doctor and newspapercolumnist. Herbert
Hoover, then the headof the U.S. Food
Administration,convertedtocaloriecount
ing.Dr.Petersadvised patients to start
with a fast, oneto two days abstaining
from all foods,and then stick strictly to
1200
caloriesperday.Whiletheadvicetofastwas
quicklyforgotten,moderncalorie-
counting schedules are not
verydifferent.
By the 1950s, a perceived
“greatepidemic” of heart disease
wasbecominganincreasingpublicconcer
n.Seemingly healthy Americans
weredeveloping heart attacks with
growingregularity. In hindsight, it
should havebeen obvious that there was
really nosuchepidemic.
The discovery of vaccines
andantibiotics, combined with
increasedpublic sanitation, had
reshaped themedical landscape.
Formerly lethalinfections, such as
pneumonia,tuberculosis and
gastrointestinalinfections,becamecu
rable.Heart
disease and cancer now caused
arelatively greater percentage of
deaths,giving rise to some of the
publicmisperception of an epidemic.
(SeeFigure 1.1.6)
Figure1.1.CausesofdeathintheUnitedS
tates1900vs.1960.
The increase in life expectancy
from1900to1950reinforcedthepercepti
on
of a coronary-disease epidemic. For
awhite male, the life expectancy in
1900was fifty years.7By 1950, it
hadreached sixty-six years, and by
1970,almost sixty-eight years. If people
werenot dying of tuberculosis, then
theywould live long enough to develop
theirheart attack. Currently, the average
ageat first heart attack is sixty-six
years.8The risk of a heart attack in a
fifty-year-old man is substantially
lower than in asixty-eight-year-old
man. So the naturalconsequence of a
longer life
expectancyisanincreasedrateofcoronary
disease.
Butallgreatstories needavillain,
and dietary fat was cast into that
role.Dietary fat was thought to increase
theamountofcholesterol,afattysubstance
that is thought to contribute to
heartdisease, in the blood. Soon,
physiciansbegantoadvocate lower-
fatdiets.Withgreat enthusiasm and shaky
science, thedemonization of dietary fat
began inearnest.
There was a problem, though
wedidn’t see it at the time. The
threemacronutrients are fat, protein
andcarbohydrates: lowering dietary
fatmeantreplacingitwitheitherproteinorc
arbohydrates. Since many high-
proteinfoods like meat and dairy are
also highin fat, it is difficult to lower
fat in
thedietwithoutloweringproteinaswell.
So,ifone were
torestrictdietaryfats,then one must
increase dietarycarbohydrates
andviceversa.Inthe
developed world, these
carbohydratesalltendtobehighlyrefine
d.
Low Fat = High
CarbohydrateThisdilemmacreate
dsignificant
cognitive dissonance.
Refinedcarbohydrates could not
simultaneouslybe both good (because
they are low
infat)andbad(becausetheyarefattening).T
he solution adopted by most
nutritionexperts was to suggest
thatcarbohydrateswerenolongerfattenin
g.Instead,calorieswerefattening.Without
evidence or historical precedent, it
wasarbitrarily decided that excess
caloriescausedweightgain,notspecificfo
ods.
Fat,asthedietaryvillain,wasnowdee
med fattening—a
previouslyunknownconcept.TheCal
ories-
In/Calories-Out model began to
displacethe prevailing “fattening
carbohydrates”model.
But not everybody bought in. One
ofthe most famous dissidents was
theprominent British nutritionist
JohnYudkin (1910–1995). Studying diet
andheart disease, he found no
relationshipbetween dietary fat and
heart
disease.Hebelievedthatthemainculpritof
bothobesity and heart disease was
sugar.9,10His 1972 book, Pure, White
andDeadly:HowSugarIsKilling
Us,iseerily prescient (and should
certainlywin the award for Best Book
TitleEver). Scientific debate raged back
andforth about whether the culprit
wasdietaryfatorsugar.
THEDIETARYGUIDELINES
THE ISSUEWASfinallysettledin1977,notby
scientific debate and discovery, butby
governmental decree. GeorgeMcGovern,
then chairman of the UnitedStates
Senate Select Committee onNutrition
and Human Needs, convened atribunal,
and after several days ofdeliberation, it
was decided thathenceforth, dietary fat
was guilty ascharged. Not only was
dietary fat guiltyof causing heart
disease, but it alsocaused
obesity,sincefatiscaloricallydense.
The resulting declaration became
theDietaryGoalsfortheUnitedStates.Ane
ntire nation, and soon the entire
world,wouldnowfollownutritionaladvice
from a politician. This was a
remarkablebreak from tradition. For the
first time, agovernment institution
intruded into thekitchens of America.
Mom used to tell uswhat we should and
should not eat. Butfrom now on, Big
Brother would betelling us. And he said,
“Eat less fat andmorecarbohydrates.”
Severalspecificdietarygoalsweresetf
orth.Theseincluded
raiseconsumptionofcarbohydratesu
ntiltheyconstituted55percentto60pe
rcent ofcalories,anddecrease fat
consumption fromapproximately
40 percent ofcalories to 30
percent, of which nomorethanone-
thirdshouldcome
Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise
than click here
fromsaturatedfat.
With no scientific evidence,
theformerly
“fattening”carbohydratemadeastunningtra
nsformation.Whiletheguidelines still
recognized the evils ofsugar, refined
grain was as innocent as
anuninaconvent.Itsnutritionalsinswereex
onerated, and it was henceforth
rebornandbaptizedasthehealthywholegrai
n.
Was there any evidence? It
hardlymattered. The goals were now
thenutritionalorthodoxy.Everythingelse
was heathen. If you didn’t toe the
line,you were ridiculed. The
DietaryGuidelinesforAmericans,
areportreleasedin1980forwidespreadpu
blicconsumption,followedthe
recommendations of the
McGovernreportclosely.Thenutritionalla
ndscapeoftheworldwas foreverchanged.
TheDietaryGuidelinesforAmericans,
now updated every fiveyears, spawned
the infamous
foodpyramidinallitscounterfactualglory.
The foods that formed the base of
thepyramid—
thefoodsweshouldeateverysingleday—
werebreads,pastasand potatoes. These
were the precisefoods that we had
previously avoided
tostaythin.Forexample,theAmericanHear
tAssociation’s1995pamphlet,TheAmeri
can Heart Association Diet:
AnEatingPlan
forHealthyAmericans,declared we
should eat six or
moreservingsof“breads,cereals,pastaan
d
starchy vegetables (that) are low in
fatand cholesterol.” To drink,
“Choose...fruit punches, carbonated soft
drinks.”Ahhh. White bread and
carbonated softdrinks—the dinner of
champions.
Thankyou,AmericanHeartAssociation(AH
A).
Entering this brave new
world,Americans tried to comply with
thenutritionalauthoritiesofthedayandmad
e a conscious effort to eat less fat,less
red meat, fewer eggs and
morecarbohydrates. When doctors
advisedpeople to stop smoking, rates
droppedfrom33percentin1979to25perce
ntby1994. When doctors said to
controlblood pressure and cholesterol,
therewas a 40 percent decline in high
bloodpressureanda
28percentdeclineinhigh
cholesterol. When the AHA told us to
eatmore bread and drink more juice, we
atemorebreadanddrankmorejuice.
Inevitably, sugar
consumptionincreased. From 1820 to
1920, newsugar plantations in the
Caribbean andAmerican South
increased theavailability of sugar in
the U.S.
Sugarintakeplateauedfrom1920to1977
.
Eventhough“avoidtoomuchsugar”was
anexplicitgoalofthe1977DietaryGuideli
nes for Americans,
consumptionincreasedanywayuntiltheye
ar2000.
With all our attention focused on fat,
wetookoureyesofftheball.Everythingwas
“lowfat”or“lowcholesterol,”andnobody
waspayingattentiontosugar.
Food processors, figuringthisout,
increasedtheaddedsugarsinprocessedfood
forflavor.
Refined grain consumption
increasedby almost 45 percent.
Sincecarbohydrates in North America
tendedto be refined, we ate more and
morelow-
fatbreadandpasta,notcauliflowerandkal
e.11
Success! From 1976 to 1996,
theaverage fat intake decreased from
45percentofcaloriesto35percent.Butterco
nsumptiondecreased 38 percent.
Animal protein decreased 13
percent.Egg consumption decreased 18
percent.Grains andsugarsincreased.
Figure1.2.Increaseinobeseandextre
melyobeseUnitedStatesadultsaged2
0–74.
Until that point, the
widespreadadoption of the low-fat diet
wascompletelyuntested.Wehadnoideawh
at effect it would have on humanhealth.
But we had the fatal conceit thatwe
were somehow smarter than
200,000yearsofMotherNature.So,turnin
g
away from the natural fats, we
embracedrefined low-fat carbohydrates
such asbread and pasta. Ironically,
theAmerican Heart Association, even
aslate as the year 2000, felt that low-
carbohydratedietsweredangerousfads,de
spitethefactthatthesedietshadbeeninusea
lmostcontinuouslysince1863.
Whatwastheresult?Theincidenceofhea
rt disease certainly did not decreaseas
expected. But there was definitely
aconsequencetothisdietarymanipulation
—
anunintentionalone.Ratesofobesity,define
d as having a body mass indexgreater
than 30, dramatically increased,starting
almost exactly in 1977,
asillustratedbyFigure 1.2.12
Theabruptincreaseinobesitybegan
exactly with the officially
sanctionedmove toward a low-fat, high-
carbohydrate diet. Was it
merecoincidence?Perhapsthefaultlayinou
rgeneticmakeupinstead.
(2)
INHERITING
OBESITY
IT IS FAIRLYobvious that obesity runs
infamilies.1Obese children often
haveobese siblings. Obese children
becomeobese adults.2Obese adults go
on
tohaveobesechildren.Childhoodobesityi
s associated with a 200 percent to
400percent increased risk of adult
obesity.This is an undeniable fact.
Thecontroversy revolves around
whetherthis trend is a genetic or
anenvironmental problem—the
classicnatureversusnurturedebate.
Familiessharegeneticcharacteristics
that may lead to obesity.
However,obesityhasbecomerampantonl
ysince
the1970s.Ourgenescouldnothavecha
ngedwithinsuchashorttime.
Geneticscanexplainmuchoftheinter-
individual risk of obesity, but not
whyentirepopulationsbecomeobese.
Nonetheless, families live in the
sameenvironment,eatsimilarfoodsatsimi
lartimesandhavesimilar attitudes.
Families often share cars, live in
thesamephysicalspaceandwillbeexpose
dtothesamechemicalsthatmaycause
obesity—so-called chemicalobesogens.
For these reasons, manyconsider the
current environment
themajorcauseofobesity.
Conventional calorie-based
theoriesof obesity place the blame
squarely
onthis“toxic”environmentthatencourages
How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you
want to learn this special method than click
here Do you want to loss your weight without any
exercise than click here
eating and discourages
physicalexertion. Dietary and
lifestyle
habitshavechangedconsiderablysincet
he1970sincluding
adoption of a low-fat, high-
carbohydrate
diet,increased number of
eatingopportunitiesperday,
moremealseatingout,more
fast-food restaurants,more
time spent in cars
andvehicles,
increased popularityofvideosgames,
increased use of
computers,increasein dietary
sugar,increaseduseofhigh-
fructosecorn
syrupand
increased portionsizes.
Anyorallofthesefactorsmaycontribute
to the obesogenicenvironment.
Therefore, most moderntheories of
obesity discount
theimportanceofgeneticfactors,believin
ginstead that consumption of
excesscalories leads to obesity. Eating
andmoving are voluntary behaviors,
afterall,withlittlegeneticinput.
So—
exactlyhowmuchofaroledoesgeneticsplayi
nhumanobesity?
NATUREVERSUSNURTURE
THE CLASSIC METHODfor determining
therelative impact of genetic
versusenvironmental factors is to
studyadoptive families, thereby
removinggeneticsfromtheequation.Byco
mparing adoptees to their biologicaland
adoptive parents, the
relativecontribution of environmental
influencescan be isolated. Dr. Albert J.
Stunkardperformed some of the classic
geneticstudies of obesity.3Data
aboutbiological parents is often
incomplete,confidential and not easily
accessible byresearchers. Fortunately,
Denmark hasmaintained a relatively
complete registryof adoptions, with
information on bothsetsofparents.
Studyingasampleof540Danishadultado
ptees, Dr. Stunkard compared themto
both their adoptive and
biologicalparents. If environmental
factors weremost important, then
adoptees shouldresemble their adoptive
parents. Ifgenetic factors were most
important, theadoptees should resemble
theirbiologicalparents.
Norelationshipwhatsoeverwasdiscover
ed
betweentheweightoftheadoptiveparentsa
ndtheadoptees.
Whetheradoptiveparentswerethinorfat
made no difference to the
eventualweight of the adopted child.
Theenvironment provided by the
adoptiveparentswaslargelyirrelevant.
Thisfindingwasaconsiderable
shock. Standard calorie-based
theoriesblame environmental factors and
humanbehaviors for obesity.
Environmentalcues such as dietary
habits, fast
food,junkfood,candyintake,lackofexerci
se,number of cars, and lack of
playgroundsandorganizedsportsarebelie
vedcrucialinthedevelopmentofobesity.
Buttheyplayvirtuallyno role. Infact,the
fattest adoptees had the
thinnestadoptive parents.
Comparing adoptees to
theirbiologicalparentsyieldedaconsider
ablydifferentresult.Heretherewas a
strong, consistent correlationbetween
their weights. The biologicalparents had
very little or nothing to
dowithraisingthesechildren,orteaching
themnutritionalvaluesorattitudestoward
exercise. Yet the tendencytoward
obesity followed them likeducklings.
When you took a child
awayfromobeseparentsandplacedthemint
oa “thin” household, the child
stillbecame obese.
Whatwasgoingon?
Studying identical twins raised
apartis another classic strategy to
distinguishenvironmentalandgeneticfac
tors.
Identicaltwinsshareidenticalgeneticm
aterial, and fraternal twins share
25percentoftheirgenes. In1991, Dr.
Stunkard examined sets of fraternal
andidentical twins in both conditions
ofbeing reared apart and reared
together.4Comparisonoftheirweightswo
uld
determine the effect of the
differentenvironments. The results sent
ashockwave through the obesity-
researchcommunity. Approximately 70
percent ofthevariance
inobesityisfamilial.
Seventypercent.
Seventypercentofyourtendencytogai
n weight is determined by
yourparentage. Obesity is
overwhelminglyinherited.
However, it is immediately clear
thatinheritance cannot be the sole
factorleading to the obesity epidemic.
Theincidenceofobesityhasbeenrelativel
ystable through the decades. Most of
theobesityepidemicmaterializedwithina
single generation. Our genes have
notchangedinthattimespan.Howcanwe
explainthisseemingcontradiction?
THETHRIFTY-
GENEHYPOTHESIS
THE FIRST ATTEMPTto explain the
geneticbasis of obesity was the thrifty-
genehypothesis, which became popular
in the1970s. This hypothesis assumes
that allhumans are evolutionarily
predisposedtogainweightasasurvivalmec
hanism.
Theargumentgoessomethinglikethis:
In Paleolithic times, food
wasscarceanddifficulttoobtain.Hungeri
sone of the most powerful and basic
ofhuman instincts. The thrifty
genecompels us to eat as much as
possible,and this genetic predisposition
to gainweighthadasurvivaladvantage.
Increasingthebody’sfoodstores(fat)permitt
edlongersurvivalduringtimesof
scarce or no food. Those who tended
toburnthecaloriesinsteadofstoringthem
were selectively wiped out.
However,thethriftygeneisilladaptedtothe
modern all-you-can-eat world, as
itcauses weight gain and obesity. But
weare simply following our genetic
urge togainfat.
Likeadecomposingwatermelon,thishyp
othesisseemsquitereasonableonthesurfac
e. Cut a little deeper, and you findthe
rotten core. This theory has
longceasedtobetaken
seriously.However,it is still mentioned
in the media, and soits flaws bear some
examination. Themost obvious problem
is that survival inthe wild depends on
not being
eitherunderweightoroverweight.Afatani
mal
is slower and less agile than its
leanerbrethren.Predatorswouldpreferenti
allyeat the fatter prey over the harder-to-
catch, lean prey. By the same token,
fatpredators would find it much
moredifficulttocatchleanandswiftprey.
Body fatness does not always provide
asurvival advantage, but instead can be
asignificant disadvantage. How
manytimes have you seen a fat zebra
orgazelle on the National
Geographicchannel?Whataboutfatlionsa
ndtigers?
Theassumptionthathumansaregenetica
lly predisposed to overeat isincorrect.
Just as there are hormonalsignals of
hunger, there are
multiplehormonesthattelluswhenwe’refu
llandstopusfromovereating.Consider
the all-you-can-eat buffet. It
isimpossibletosimplyeatandeatwithoutst
opping because we get
“full.”Continuing to eat may make us
becomesickandthrowup.Thereisnogeneti
cpredisposition to overeating. There
is,instead, powerful built-in
protectionagainstit.
The thrifty-gene hypothesis
assumeschronic food shortages
preventedobesity. However, many
traditionalsocieties had plentiful food
year
round.Forexample,theTokelau,aremotet
ribein the South Pacific, lived on
coconut,breadfruit and fish, which
wereavailableyearround.Regardless,obe
sity was unknown among them
untiltheonsetofindustrializationandthe
Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise
than click here
Westernization of their traditional
diet.Even in modern-day North
America,widespreadfaminehasbeenunco
mmonsince the Great Depression. Yet
thegrowth of obesity has happened
onlysince the 1970s.
In wild animals, morbid obesity
israre, even with an abundance of
food,exceptwhenitispartofthenormallife
cycle,aswithhibernatinganimals.
Abundant food leads to a rise in
thenumbers of animals, not an
enormousincrease
intheirsize.Thinkaboutratsorcockroaches.
When food is scarce, ratpopulations are
low. When food isplentiful, rat
populations explode.
Therearemanymorenormal-
sizedrats,notthesamenumberofmorbidlyo
beserats.
There is no survival advantage
tocarryingaveryhighbody-
fatpercentage.A male marathon runner
may have 5percent to 11 percent
bodyfat. Thisamount provides enough
energy
tosurviveformorethanamonthwithouteatin
g.Certainanimalsfattenregularly.
For instance, bears routinely gain
weightbefore hibernation—and they do
sowithout illness. Humans, though, do
nothibernate. There is an
importantdifference between being fat
and beingobese. Obesity is the state of
being fat tothe point of having
detrimental
healthconsequences.Bears,alongwithwh
ales,walruses and other fat animals are
fat,but not obese, since they suffer no
healthconsequences.Theyare,infact,
genetically programmed to become
fat.We aren’t. In humans, evolution did
notfavorobesity,butrather,leanness.
The thrifty-gene hypothesis
doesn’texplain obesity, but what does?
As wewill see in Part 3, “A New Model
ofObesity,” the root cause of obesity is
acomplex hormonal imbalance with
highblood
insulinasitscentralfeature.Thehormonal
profile of a baby is influencedby the
environment in the mother’s bodybefore
birth, setting up a tendency forhigh
insulin levels and associatedobesity
later in life. The explanation ofobesity
as a caloric imbalance simplycannot
account for this predominantlygenetic
effect, since eating and
exercisearevoluntarybehaviors.Obesitya
s a
hormonalimbalancemoreeffectivelye
xplainsthisgeneticeffect.
But inherited factors account for
only70percentofthetendencytoobesitythat
we observe. The other 30 percent
offactors are under our control, but
whatshouldwedotomakethemostofthis?
Aredietandexercisetheanswer?
PART
TWO
TheCalorieDeception
(3)
THECALORIE-
REDUCTIONERRO
R
TRADITIONALLY,OBESITYHASbeenseen
as a result of how people
processcalories, that is, that a person’s
weightcouldbe predictedbya
simpleequation:
Calories In–Calories
Out=BodyFatThiskeyequationperpetra
teswhatI
call the calorie deception. It
isdangerous
preciselybecauseitappearsso simple
and intuitive. But what
youneedtounderstandisthatmanyfalseass
umptions arebuiltin.
Assumption1:CaloriesIn
and
CaloriesOutareindepende
ntofeachother
THISASSUMPTIONISacrucialmistake.
As we’ll see later on in this
chapter,experimentsandexperiencehave
proventhisassumptionfalse.Caloricintake
andexpenditure are intimately
dependentvariables. Decreasing
Calories
IntriggersadecreaseinCaloriesOut.A30
percent reduction in caloric
intakeresults in a 30 percent decrease
incaloric expenditure. The end result
isminimalweightloss.
Assumption2:Basalmet
abolicrateisstable
WEOBSESSABOUTcaloricintakewith
barely a thought for caloric
expenditure,except for exercise.
Measuring caloricintake is simple, but
measuring
thebody’stotalenergyexpenditureiscomp
licated. Therefore, the simple
butcompletely erroneous assumption
ismade that energy expenditure
remainsconstant except for exercise.
Totalenergy expenditure is the sum of
basalmetabolic rate, thermogenic effect
offood, nonexercise
activitythermogenesis, excess post-
exerciseoxygen consumption and
exercise. Thetotal energy expenditure
can go up ordown by as much as 50
percentdepending upon the caloric
intake aswellasotherfactors.
Assumption 3: We
exertconsciouscontrolov
erCaloriesIn
EATINGISAdeliberateact,soweassume
that eating is a conscious decision
andthathungerplaysonlyaminorroleinit.B
ut numerous overlapping
hormonalsystems influence the decision
of whento eat and when to stop. We
consciouslydecide to eat in response to
hungersignals that are largely
hormonallymediated. We consciously
stop eatingwhen the body sends signals
of satiety(fullness) that are largely
hormonallymediated.
Forexample,thesmelloffryingfoodmake
syouhungryatlunchtime.
However, if you have just finished
alarge buffet, those same smells
maymake you slightly queasy. The
smells arethe same. The decision to eat
or not isprincipallyhormonal.
Ourbodiespossessanintricatesystem
guiding us to eat or not. Body-
fatregulationisunderautomaticcontrol,lik
e breathing. We do not
consciouslyremind ourselves to breathe,
nor do
weremindourheartstobeat.Theonlywayto
achieve such control is to
havehomeostatic mechanisms.
Sincehormones control both Calories In
andCaloriesOut, obesityisahormonal,
notacaloric,disorder.
Assumption4:Fatstoresare
How Jones loss his weight
without any exercise you want
to learn this special method
than click here
essentiallyunregulated
EVERY SINGLE SYSTEM in the body
isregulated.Growthinheightisregulatedb
y growth hormone. Blood sugars
areregulated by the hormones insulin
andglucagon, among others.
Sexualmaturation is regulated by
testosteroneand estrogen. Body
temperature isregulated by a thyroid-
stimulatinghormone and free thyroxine.
The list isendless.
We are asked to believe,
however,that growth of fat cells is
essentiallyunregulated.Thesimpleact
ofeating,without any interference
from
anyhormones,willresultinfatgrowth.
Extracaloriesaredumpedintofatcellsliked
oorknobsintoasack.
This assumption has already
beenprovenfalse.Newhormonalpathway
sin the regulation of fat growth are
beingdiscovered all the time. Leptin is
thebest-known hormone regulating
fatgrowth, but adiponectin, hormone-
sensitivelipase,lipoproteinlipaseandadi
pose triglyceride lipase may all
playimportantroles.Ifhormonesregulatef
atgrowth,then obesityisahormonal,
notacaloricdisorder.
Assumption5:Acalorieisacal
orie
THISASSUMPTION ISthemostdangerous
ofall.It’sobviouslytrue.Justlike adogis a
dog or a desk is a desk. There
aremanydifferentkindsofdogsanddesks,
but the simple statement that a dog is
adog is true. However, the real issue
isthis: Are all calories equally likely
tocausefatgain?
“A calorie is a calorie” implies
thatthe only important variable in
weightgainisthetotalcaloricintake,andth
us,all foods can be reduced to their
caloricenergy. But does a calorie of
olive oilcause the same metabolic
response as acalorie of sugar? The
answer is,obviously, no. These two
foods
havemanyeasilymeasurabledifferences.
Sugar will increase the blood
glucoselevel and provoke an insulin
responsefrom the pancreas. Olive oil will
not.Whenoliveoilisabsorbedbythe
smallintestineandtransportedtotheliver,
thereisnosignificantincreaseinbloodgluco
se or insulin. The two differentfoods
evoke vastly different
metabolicandhormonalresponses.
These five assumptions—the
keyassumptions in the caloric
reductiontheory of weight loss—have
all beenprovedfalse.
Allcaloriesarenotequally likely to cause
weight gain.
Theentirecaloricobsessionwas afifty-
yeardeadend.
So we must begin again. What
causesweightgain?
HOWDOWEPROCESSFOOD?
WHAT IS Acalorie? A calorie is simply
aunit of energy. Different foods
areburnedinalaboratory,andtheamountofh
eatreleasedismeasuredtodetermineacalor
icvalue forthatfood.
All the foods we eat contain
calories.Foodfirstentersthestomach,wher
eitismixed with stomach acid and
slowlyreleasedintothesmallintestine.
Nutrients are extracted throughout
thejourney through the small and
largeintestines.Whatremainsisexcretedass
tool.
Proteins are broken down into
theirbuilding blocks, amino acids. These
areused to build and repair the
body’stissues,andtheexcessisstored.Fatsa
re
directly absorbed into the
body.Carbohydrates are broken down
intotheir building blocks, sugars.
Proteins,fats and carbohydrates all
providecaloricenergyforthebody,butdi
ffergreatly in their metabolic
processing.This results in different
hormonalstimuli.
CALORICREDUCTIONISNOTT
HE PRIMARY FACTOR
INWEIGHTLOSS
WHY DO WE gain weight? The
mostcommon answer is that excess
caloricintakecausesobesity.Butalthoug
htheincrease in obesity rates in the
UnitedStates from 1971 to 2000
wasassociated with an increase in
dailycalorie consumption of roughly
200 to300 calories,1it’s important
toremember that correlation is
notcausation.
Furthermore, the correlation
betweenweight gain and the increase in
calorieconsumptionhasrecentlybrokendo
wn.2Data from the National Health
andNutritionExaminationSurvey(NHANES)
in the United States from 1990 to
2010finds
noassociationbetweenincreasedcalorie
consumptionandweightgain.
While obesity increased at a rate of
0.37percentperyear,caloricintakeremaine
dvirtually stable. Women
slightlyincreased their average daily
intake from1761calories to 1781, but
men slightlydecreased theirs from 2616
calories to2511.
The British obesity epidemic
largelyran parallel to North America’s.
Butonce again, the association of
weightgainwithincreased
calorieconsumptiondoes not hold
true.3In the Britishexperience, neither
increased caloricintake nor dietary fat
correlated toobesity—
whicharguesagainstacausal
relationship.Infact,thenumberofcalories
ingested slightly
decreased,evenasobesityratesincreased.
Otherfactors, including the nature of
thosecalories,hadchanged.
Wemayimagineourselvestobeacalo
rie-weighingscaleand maythinkthat
imbalance of calories over
timeleadstotheaccumulationoffat.
Calories In–Calories
Out=BodyFatIfCaloriesOutremainssta
bleover
time, then reducing Calories In
shouldproduce weight loss. The First
Law
ofThermodynamicsstatesthatenergycann
either be created nor destroyed in
anisolated system. This law is
ofteninvoked to support the
CaloriesIn/CaloriesOutmodel.Promine
nt
obesity researcher Dr. Jules
Hirsch,quotedina2012NewYorkTim
esarticle,4explains:
Thereisaninflexiblelawofphysics—
energy taken in must exactly equal
thenumberofcaloriesleavingthesystemwh
enfatstorageisunchanged.Caloriesleaveth
esystem
whenfoodisusedtofuelthebody.Tolowerfa
tcontent—reduceobesity—
onemustreducecaloriestakenin,orincrease
theoutputbyincreasingactivity,orboth.Thi
sistruewhethercaloriescomefrompumpkin
sorpeanutsorpâtédefoiegras.
But thermodynamics, a law
ofphysics,hasminimalrelevancetohuman
biology for the simple reason that
thehumanbodyisnotanisolatedsystem.
Energy is constantly entering
andleaving. Infact,
theveryactwearemostconcerned about—
eating—puts
energyintothesystem.Foodenergyisalsoe
xcreted from the system in the form
ofstool. Having studied a full year
ofthermodynamics in university, I
canassure you that neither calories
norweight gain were mentioned even
asingle time.
If we eat an extra 200 calories
today,nothing prevents the body from
burningthat excess for heat. Or perhaps
thatextra
200caloriesisexcretedasstool.Or
perhaps the liver uses the extra 200.We
obsess about caloric input into
thesystem,butoutputisfarmoreimportant.
Whatdeterminestheenergyoutputof
How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you
want to learn this special method than click here
thesystem?Supposeweconsume2000ca
lories of chemical energy (food) inone
day. What is the metabolic fate
ofthose2000calories?Possibilitiesforth
eiruse include
heatproduction,
new protein
production,new bone
production,new muscle
production,cognition
(brain),increasedheartra
te,
increased stroke volume
(heart),exercise/physicalexertion
,detoxification
(liver),detoxification(kidney),di
gestion (pancreas and
bowels),breathing(lungs),
excretion(intestinesandcolon)andfat
production.
We certainly don’t mind if energy
isburned as heat or used to build
newprotein,butwedomindifitisdeposited
as fat. There are an almost
infinitenumberofwaysthatthebodycandiss
ipate excess energy instead
ofstoringitasbodyfat.
Withthemodelofthecalorie-balancing
scale, we assume that fat gainor loss is
essentially unregulated, andthat weight
gain and loss is underconscious control.
But no system in thebody is unregulated
like that.
Hormonestightlyregulateeverysinglesyst
eminthebody.Thethyroid,parathyroid,
sympathetic,
parasympathetic,respiratory, circulatory,
hepatic,
renal,gastrointestinalandadrenalsystemsa
reall under hormonal control. So is
bodyfat. The body actually has
multiplesystemstocontrolbodyweight.
The problem of fat accumulation
isreally a problem of distribution
ofenergy. Too much energy is diverted
tofat production as opposed to,
say,increasing, body-heat production.
Thevast majority of this energy
expenditureis controlled automatically,
withexercise being the only factor that
isunder our conscious control.
Forexample, we cannot decide how
muchenergy to expend on fat
accumulationversusnewboneformation.
Sincethese
metabolicprocessesarevirtuallyimpossib
le to measure, they are assumedto
remain relatively stable. In
particular,CaloriesOutisassumednottoch
angeinresponsetoCaloriesIn.Wepresume
thatthetwo areindependentvariables.
Let’stakeananalogy.Considerthemoney
thatyouearninayear(MoneyIn)and the
money that you spend (MoneyOut).
Suppose you normally earn andalso
spend $100,000 per year. If
MoneyInisnowreducedto$25,000
peryear,whatwouldhappentoMoneyOut?
Wouldyoucontinuetospend$100,000pery
ear? Probablyyou’re
notsostupid,asyou’dquicklybecomebank
rupt.
Instead,youwouldreduceyourMoneyOutto
$25,000peryeartobalancethe
budget. Money In and Money Out
aredependent variables, since reduction
ofone willdirectlycause
areductionoftheother.
Let’sapplythisreasoningtoobesity.
Reducing Calories In works only
ifCalories Out remains stable. What
wefind instead is that a sudden
reduction ofCalories
IncausesasimilarreductioninCalories
Out, and no weight is lost
asthebodybalancesitsenergybudget.
Some historic experiments in
caloriereductionhaveshownexactlyth
is.
CALORIC
REDUCTION:EXTREME
EXPERIMENTS,UNEXPECTE
D
RESULTSEXPERIMENTALLY,IT’SEAS
Ytostudy
caloric reduction. We take some
people,give them less to eat, watch them
loseweight and live happily ever after.
Bam.Case closed. Call the Nobel
committee:Eat Less, Move More is the
cure
forobesity,andcaloricreductiontrulyisthe
bestwaytoloseweight.
Luckily for us, such studies
havealreadybeendone.
A detailed study of total
energyexpenditure under conditions of
reducedcaloric intake was done in 1919
at theCarnegie Institute of
Washington.5Volunteersconsumed“sem
i-starvation”
diets of 1400 to 2100 calories per
day,an amount calculated to
beapproximately 30 percent lower
thantheirusualintake.(Manycurrentweigh
t-loss diets target very similar levels
ofcaloric intake.) The question
waswhethertotalenergyexpenditure(Calo
ries Out) decreases in response
tocaloric reduction (Calories In).
Whathappened?
The participants experienced
awhopping 30 percent decrease in
totalenergy expenditure, from an
initialcaloric expenditure of roughly
3000calories to approximately 1950
calories.Even nearly 100 years ago, it
was clearthat Calories Out is highly
dependent onCaloriesIn. A30
percentreductionin
caloric intake resulted in a
nearlyidentical30percentreductionincalor
icexpenditure. The energy budget
isbalanced. The First Law
ofThermodynamicsisnotbroken.
Several decades later, in 1944
and1945, Dr. Ancel Keys performed
themostcompleteexperimentofstarvatio
never done—the Minnesota
StarvationExperiment, the details of
which werepublished in 1950 in a two-
volumepublication entitled The
Biology ofHuman Starvation.6In the
aftermath ofWorld War II, millions of
people wereon the verge of starvation.
Yet thephysiologic effects of starvation
werevirtually unknown, having never
beenscientificallystudied.
TheMinnesota
study was an attempt to understand
boththe caloric-reduction and
recoveryphases of starvation.
Improvedknowledge would help guide
Europe’srecovery from the brink.
Indeed, as aresult of this study, a
relief-worker’sfield manual was
written
detailingpsychologicalaspectsofstarvat
ion.7
Thirty-sixyoung,healthy,normalmen
were selected with an average height
offive foot ten inches (1.78 meters) and
anaverage weight of 153 pounds
(69.3kilograms). For the first three
months,subjects received a standard
diet
of3200caloriesperday.Overthenextsixm
onths of semi-starvation, only
1570calories were given to them.
However,caloricintake
wascontinuallyadjusted
to reach a target total weight loss of
24percent (compared to
baseline),averaging
2.5pounds(1.1kilograms)perweek.Some
meneventuallyreceivedlessthan1000calo
riesperday. The foods given were high
incarbohydrates,similartothoseavailable
in war-torn Europe at the time—
potatoes,turnips,breadandmacaroni.
Meat and dairy products were
rarelygiven.Inaddition,theywalked 22
milesper week as exercise. Following
thiscaloric-reduction phase, their
calorieswere gradually increased over
threemonths of rehabilitation.
Expectedcaloricexpenditurewas3009
caloriesperday.8
EvenDr.Keyshimselfwasshocked
by the difficulty of the experiment.
Themenexperiencedprofoundphysicalan
dpsychologicalchanges.Amongthemostc
onsistent findings was the
constantfeeling of cold experienced by
theparticipants. As one explained,
“I’mcold. In July I walk downtown on
asunny day with a shirt and sweater
tokeepmewarm.Atnightmywellfedroom
mate, who isn’t in the
experiment,sleeps on top of his sheets
but I crawlundertwoblankets.”9
Restingmetabolicratedroppedby40
percent. Interestingly, thisphenomenon
is very similar to that of theprevious
study, which showed a drop
of30percent.Measurementofthesubjects’
strengthshoweda21percentdecrease.
Do you want to loss your weight
without any exercise than click here
Heartrateslowed considerably,
fromanaverage of fifty-five beats per
minute toonly thirty-five. Heart stroke
volumedecreased by 20 percent.
Bodytemperature dropped to an average
of95.8°F.10Physical endurance
droppedby half. Blood pressure
dropped.
Menbecameextremelytiredanddizzy.The
ylosthairandtheirnails grewbrittle.
Psychologically, there were
equallydevastating effects. The
menexperienced a complete lack of
interestin everything except for food,
whichbecame an object of intense
fascinationto them. Some hoarded
cookbooks andutensils. They were
plagued
withconstant,unyieldinghunger.Somewe
reunabletoconcentrate,andseveral
withdrew from their university
studies.There were several cases of
franklyneuroticbehavior.
Let’s reflect on what was
happeninghere.Priortothestudy,thesubj
ectsateand also burned approximately
3000calories per day. Then, suddenly,
theircaloric intake was reduced
toapproximately 1500 per day. All
bodyfunctions that require
energyexperienced an immediate,
across-the-board 30 percent to 40
percentreduction, which wrought
completehavoc.Consider
thefollowing:
Caloriesareneededtoheatthebod
y.
Fewercalorieswereavailable,sob
odyheatwas
reduced. Result: constant feeling
ofcold.
Caloriesareneededforthehearttopu
mp blood.
Fewercalorieswereavailable, so
the pump sloweddown. Result:
heart rate and strokevolume
decreases.
Calories are needed to
maintainbloodpressure.Fewercalor
ieswereavailable,sothebodyturnedt
he pressure down. Result:
bloodpressuredecreased.
Caloriesareneeded
forbrainfunction, as the brain
is verymetabolically active.
Fewercalorieswereavailable,s
ocognition was reduced.
Result:lethargyandinabilityto
concentrate.
Calories are needed to move
thebody.Fewercalorieswereavail
able, so movement
wasreduced.Result:weaknessduri
ngphysicalactivity.
Caloriesareneededto
replacehairandnails.Fewercalories
wereavailable, so
hairandnailswerenot replaced.
Result: brittle nailsandhairloss.
The body reacts in this way—
byreducing energy expenditure—
becausethe body is smart and doesn’t
want todie. What would happen if the
bodycontinuedtoexpend3000caloriesdai
lywhiletakinginonly1500?Soonfat
stores would be burned, then
proteinstores would be burned, and then
youwoulddie.Nice.Thesmartcourseofacti
on for the body is to immediatelyreduce
caloric expenditure to
1500caloriesperdayto restorebalance.
Caloric expenditure may even
beadjusted a little lower (say, to
1400caloriesperday),tocreateamarginof
safety.This isexactlywhatthebodydoes.
In other words, the body shuts
down.In order to preserve itself, it
implementsacross-the-board reductions
in energyoutput. The crucial point to
remember
isthatdoingsoensuressurvivaloftheindivi
dualinatimeofextremestress.
Yeah,youmightfeellousy,butyou’ll
live to tell the tale. Reducing output
isthesmartthingforthebodytodo.
Burning energy it does not have
wouldquickly lead to death. The energy
budgetmustbebalanced.
CaloriesInandCalories
Outarehighlydependentvariables.
With reflection, it should
immediatelybeobviousthatcaloricexpen
dituremustdecrease. If we reduce daily
calorieintake by 500 calories, we
assume that 1pound (0.45 kilograms) of
fat per weekis lost. Does that mean that
in 200weeks, we would lose 200
pounds
(91kilograms)andweighzeropounds?Ofc
oursenot.Thebodymust,atsomepoint,
reduce its caloric expenditure
tomeetthelowercaloricintake.Itjustso
happens that this adaptation
occursalmost immediately and persists
longterm. The men in the
MinnesotaStarvation Experiment should
have lost78 pounds (35.3 kilograms),
but theactual weight lost was only 37
pounds(16.8kilograms)—
lessthanhalfofwhatwas expected. More
and more severecaloric restriction was
required
tocontinuelosingweight.Soundfamiliar?
Whathappenedtotheirweightafterthes
emi-starvationperiod?
During the semi-starvation
phase,body fat dropped much quicker
thanoverall body weight as fat stores
arepreferentially used to power the
body.Once the participants started
therecoveryperiod,theyregainedthe
weight rather quickly, in about
twelveweeks. But it didn’t stop there.
Bodyweightcontinuedtoincreaseuntilitwa
sactually higher than it was prior to
theexperiment.
The body quickly responds to
caloricreduction by reducing
metabolism (totalenergy expenditure),
but how long doesthis adaptation
persist? Given enoughtime, does the
body increase its
energyexpenditurebacktoitsprevioushigh
erlevel if caloric reduction is
maintained?The short answer is no.11In
a 2008study, participants initially lost
10percent of body weight, and their
totalenergy expenditure decreased
asexpected.Buthowlongdidthissituationla
st?Itremainedreducedover the
course of the entire study—a full
year.Evenafteroneyearatthenew,lowerbo
dyweight,theirtotalenergyexpenditure
was still reduced by
anaverageofalmost500caloriesper
day.In response to caloric
reduction,metabolism decreases
almostimmediately, and that decrease
persistsmoreorless indefinitely.
The applicability of these findings
tocaloric-reductiondietsisobvious.
Assume that prior to dieting, a
womaneats and burns 2000 calories per
day.Following doctor’s orders, she
adopts acalorie-restricted,portion-
controlled,low-fat diet, reducing her
intake by 500calories per day. Quickly,
her totalenergyexpenditure
alsodropsby500
caloriesperday,ifnotalittlemore.Shefeel
s lousy, tired, cold, hungry, irritableand
depressed, but sticks with it,thinking
that things must eventuallyimprove.
Initially, she loses weight, butas her
body’s caloric expendituredecreases to
match her lowered intake,her weight
plateaus. Her dietarycompliance is
good, but one year later,things have not
improved. Her weightslowly creeps
back up, even though sheeats the same
number of calories. Tiredof feeling so
lousy, she abandons thefailed diet and
resumes eating 2000calories per day.
Since her metabolismhas slowed to an
output of only 1500calories per day, all
her weight comesrushingback—
asfat.Thosearoundher
How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you
want to learn this special method than click here
silentlyaccuseheroflackingwillpower.Sou
nd familiar? But her weight regain isnot
her failure. Instead, it’s to beexpected.
Everything described here hasbeen well
documented over the last 100years!
ANERRONEOUSASSUMPTION
LET’S CONSIDER Alast analogy
here.Supposewemanageacoal-
firedpowerplant. Every day to generate
energy, wereceive and burn 2000 tons
of coal. Wealso keep some coal stored
in a shed,justincasewerunlow.
Now,allofasudden,wereceiveonly150
0 tons of coal a day. Should
wecontinuetoburn2000tonsofcoaldaily?
We would quickly burn through
ourstores of coal, and then our power
plantwould be shut down. Massive
blackoutsdevelop over the entire city.
Anarchyandlootingcommence.Ourbosste
llsushow utterly stupid we are and
yells,“YourassisFIRED!”Unfortunatelyfor
us,he’sentirelyright.
In reality, we’d handle this
situationanotherway.Assoonaswerealiz
ethatwe’ve received only 1500 tons of
coal,we’d immediately reduce our
powergeneration to burn only 1500
tons. Infact, we might burn only 1400
tons,
justincasetherewerefurtherreductionsin
shipments.Inthecity,afewlightsgodim,
but there are no widespreadblackouts.
Anarchy and looting areavoided. Boss
says, “Great job. You’renot as stupid
as you look. Raises
allaround.”Wemaintaintheloweroutputo
f1500tonsaslongasnecessary.
Thekeyassumptionofthetheorythatreduc
ing caloric intake leads to
weightlossisfalse,sincedecreasedcalorici
ntakeinevitablyleads todecreased
caloric expenditure. This sequence
hasbeenproventimeandagain.Wejustkeep
hoping that this strategy
willsomehow,thistime,work.Itwon’t.Fac
eit. In our heart of hearts, we
alreadyknow it to be true. Caloric
reduction andportion-
controlstrategiesonlymakeyoutired and
hungry. Worst of all... youregain
alltheweightyouhavelost.Iknowit.Youkn
owit.
We forget this inconvenient
factbecauseourdoctors,ourdieticians,ou
rgovernment, our scientists,
ourpoliticiansandourmediahaveallbeens
creamingatusfordecadesthatweightloss
is all about Calories In versusCalories
Out. “Caloric reduction
isprimary.”“EatLess,MoveMore.”We
haveheard itso oftenthatwedo
notquestionwhetherit’sthetruth.
Instead,webelievethatthefaultliesino
urselves.We feelwe havefailed.
Some silently criticize us for
notadhering to the diet. Others silently
thinkwe have no willpower and offer
usmeaningless platitudes.
Soundfamiliar?
The failing isn’t ours. The portion-
control caloric-reduction diet
isvirtually guaranteed to fail. Eating
lessdoes notresultinlastingweightloss.
EATING IS NOT
UNDERCONSCIOUSCONTR
OL
BY THE EARLY 1990s, the Battle of
theBulge was not going well. The
obesityepidemicwasgatheringmomentum
,withtype 2 diabetes following
closelybehind. The low-fat campaign
wasstartingtofizzleasthepromisedbenefits
had failed to materialize. Even as
wewere choking down our dry
skinlesschicken breast and rice cakes,
we weregetting fatter and sicker.
Looking foranswers, the National
Institutes ofHealth recruited almost
50,000 post-
menopausalwomenforthemostmassive,
expensive, ambitious
andawesomedietarystudyeverdone.
Publishedin2006,thisrandomized
controlledtrialwascalledtheWomen’sHea
lth Initiative Dietary
ModificationTrial.12This trial is
arguably the
mostimportantdietarystudyeverdone.
Approximately one-third of
thesewomen received a series of
eighteeneducation sessions, group
activities,targeted message campaigns
andpersonalized feedback over one
year.Their dietary intervention was to
reducedietary fat, which was cut down
to 20percent of daily calories. They
alsoincreasedtheirvegetableandfruitintak
eto five servings per day and grains to
sixservings. They were encouraged
toincrease
exercise.Thecontrolgroupwas instructed
to eat as they normallydid.Thoseinthis
groupwereprovided
with a copy of the Dietary
Guidelinesfor Americans, but otherwise
receivedlittlehelp.Thetrialaimedtoconfir
mthecardiovascular health and weight-
reductionbenefitsofthe low-fatdiet.
Theaverageweightofparticipantsatth
e beginning of the study was 169pounds
(76.8 kilograms). The startingaverage
body mass index was 29.1,putting
participants in the overweightcategory
(body mass index of 25 to29.9), but
bordering on obese (bodymass index
greater than 30). They werefollowed
for 7.5 years to see if thedoctor-
recommended diet reducedobesity,
heart disease and cancer
asmuchasexpected.
Thegroupthatreceiveddietary
counseling succeeded. Daily
caloriesdropped from 1788 to 1446 a
day—areduction of 342 calories per
day foroversevenyears.Fatas
apercentageofcaloriesdecreasedfrom38.
8percentto
29.8 percent, and
carbohydratesincreased from 44.5
percent to 52.7percent. The women
increased theirdaily physical activity by
14 percent.The control group continued
to eat thesamehigher-calorieandhigher-
fatdiettowhichtheywere accustomed.
The results were telling. The
“EatLess, Move More” group started
outterrifically, averaging more than
4pounds (1.8 kilograms) of weight
lossoverthefirstyear.Bythesecondyear,th
eweightstartedtoberegained,andby
the end of the study, there was
nosignificant difference between the
twogroups.
Did these women perhaps
replacesome oftheirfatwithmuscle?
Unfortunately, the average
waistcircumferenceincreasedapproximate
ly
0.39 inches (0.6 centimeters), and
theaverage waist-to-hip ratio
increasedfrom 0.82 to 0.83 inches
(2.1centimeters), which indicates
thesewomen were actually fatter than
before.Weightlossover7.5yearsofthe
EatLess,MoveMorestrategywasnoteven
onesinglekilogram(2.2pounds).
This study was only the latest in
anunbroken string of failed
experiments.Caloricreductionastheprimar
ymeans
of weight loss has
disappointedrepeatedly. Reviews of the
literature bythe U.S. Department of
Agriculture13highlight this failure. All
these studies,ofcourse, serveonlyto
confirmwhatwealready knew. Caloric
reduction doesn’tcause lasting weight
loss. Anybody
whohasevertrieditcantellyou.
Manypeopletellme,“Idon’t
understand. I eat less. I exercise
more.But I can’t seem to lose any
weight.” Iunderstand perfectly—
because thisadvice has been proven to
fail. Docaloric-reduction diets work?
No.
TheWomen’sHealthInitiativeDietaryMo
dification Trial was the
biggest,baddest, most kick-ass study of
the
EatLess,MoveMorestrategythathaseven
Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise
than click here
beenoreverwillbedone—
anditwasaresoundingrepudiationofthatstra
tegy.
What is happening when we try
toreduce calories and fail to lose
weight?Part of the problem is the
reducedmetabolism that accompanies
weightloss.Butthat’sonlythebeginning.
HUNGERGAMES
THECALORIESIN,CaloriesOutplanforweig
ht loss assumes that we
haveconsciouscontroloverwhatweeat.B
utthis belief ignores the
extremelypowerful effect of the body’s
hormonalstate. The defining
characteristic of thehuman body is
homeostasis, oradaptation to change.
Our body dealswith an ever-changing
environment.
Inresponse,thebodymakesadjustmentsto
minimizetheeffectsofsuchchangesandretu
rn to its original condition. And so
itis,whenthe bodystartstolose weight.
There are two major adaptations
tocaloric reduction. The first change,
aswe have seen, is a dramatic reduction
intotalenergyexpenditure.Thesecondkey
change is that the hormonal signals
thatstimulate hunger increase. The
body ispleadingwithus
toeatinorderforittoregainthe
lostweight.
This effect was demonstrated in
2011,in an elegant study of
hormonaladaptation to weight
loss.14Subjectswere given a diet of 500
calories perday, which produced an
average
weightlossof29.7pounds(13.5kilograms
).
Next, they were prescribed a low-
glycemic-index,low-
fatdietforweightmaintenance and were
encouraged
toexercisethirtyminutesperday.Despitet
heir best intentions, almost half of
theweightwasregained.
Varioushormonallevels,includingg
hrelin—ahormonethat,essentially,
makes us hungry—were
analyzed.Weight loss significantly
increasedghrelin levels in the study’s
subjects,even after more than one year,
comparedtothesubjects’usualbaseline.
Whatdoesthatmean?Itmeansthatthesubj
ects felt hungrier and continued
tofeelso,rightuptoendofthestudy.
The study also measured
severalsatiety hormones, including
peptide YY,amylin and cholecystokinin,
all of whichare released in response to
proteins
andfatsinourdietandservetomakeusfeelful
l.Thisresponse,inturn,producesthedesired
effect of keeping us
fromovereating.Morethanayearafterinitia
lweightloss,thelevelsofallthreesatietyhor
monesweresignificantlylowerthan
before.
Whatdoesthatmean?Itmeansthatthesubj
ectsfeltlessfull.
Withincreasedhungeranddecreasedsati
ety,thedesiretoeatrises.Moreover,these
hormonal changes occur
almostimmediately and persist
almostindefinitely. People on a diet tend
to feelhungrier, and that effect isn’t
some kindof psychological voodoo, nor
is it a lossof willpower. Increased
hunger is anormal and expected
hormonal responsetoweightloss.
Dr. Keys’s Minnesota
StarvationExperimentfirstdocumentedth
eeffectof “semi-starvation neurosis.”
Peoplewholoseweightdreamaboutfood.
Theyobsessaboutfood.Alltheycanthink
about is food. Interest in all
elsediminishes. This behavior is not
somestrange affliction of the obese. In
fact,it’s entirely hormonally driven
andnormal.Thebody,throughhungerands
atiety signaling, is compelling us to
getmore food.
Losing weight triggers two
importantresponses. First,
totalenergyexpenditure is immediately
andindefinitely reduced in order to
conservethe available energy. Second,
hormonalhunger signaling is
immediately andindefinitely amplified in
an effort
toacquiremorefood.Weightlossresultsini
ncreased hunger and
decreasedmetabolism. This evolutionary
survivalstrategyhasasinglepurpose:to
makeus
regainthelostweight.
Functional magnetic
resonanceimagingstudiesshowthatareasoft
hebraincontrollingemotionandcognitionli
ghtup inresponseto food stimuli.
Areas of the prefrontal cortex
involvedwith restraint show decreased
activity.In other words, it is harder for
peoplewho have lost weight to resist
food.15Thishasnothingwhatsoevertodo
with a lack of willpower or any kind
ofmoral failure. It’s a normal
hormonalfact of life. We feel hungry,
cold, tiredanddepressed.
Theseareallreal,measurable physical
effects of calorierestriction. Reduced
metabolism and theincreased hunger
are not the cause ofobesity—
theyaretheresult.Losing
weight causes the reduced
metabolismand increased hunger, not
the other
wayaround.Wedonotsimplymakeaperson
al choice to eat more. One of thegreat
pillars of the caloric-reductiontheory of
obesity—that we eat too muchbecause
we choose to—is simply
nottrue.Wedonoteattoomuchbecausewec
hoose to, or because food is
toodelicious, or because of salt, sugar
andfat.Weeattoomuchbecauseourownbra
incompelsusto.
THEVICIOUSCYCLEOFUNDER-
EATING
ANDSOWEhavetheviciouscycleofunder-
eating. We start by eating less andlose
some weight. As a result,
ourmetabolism slows and hunger
increases.Westarttoregainweight.Wedou
bleourefforts by eating even less. A bit
moreweight comes off, but again, total
energyexpenditure decreases and
hungerincreases. We start regaining
weight. Sowe redouble our efforts by
eating evenless. This cycle continues
until it isintolerable. We are cold, tired,
hungryand obsessing about calories.
Worst
ofall,theweightalwayscomesbackon.
At some point, we go back to our
oldwayofeating.Sincemetabolismhas
slowed so much, even resuming the
oldwayofeatingcausesquickweightgain,
up to and even a little past the
originalpoint. We are doing exactly
what
ourhormonesareinfluencingustodo.Butfri
ends, family and medicalprofessionals
silently blame the
victim,thinkingthatitis“ourfault.”Andwe
ourselvesfeelthatweare afailure.
Soundfamiliar?
All dieters share this same sad
storyof weight loss and regain. It’s a
virtualguarantee. The cycle has
beenscientifically established, and its
truthhas been forged in the tears of
millionsof dieters. Yet nutritional
authoritiescontinue to preach that
caloric
reductionwillleadtonirvanaofpermanent
weight
loss.Inwhatuniversedotheylive?
THE CRUELHOAX
CALORICREDUCTIONISaharshandbitterdisa
ppointment. Yet all the “experts”still
agree that caloric reduction is thekey to
lasting weight loss. When
youdon’tloseweight,theysay,“It’syourfau
lt. You were gluttons. You weresloths.
You didn’t try hard enough. Youdidn’t
want it badly enough.” There’s adirty
little secret that nobody is willingto
admit: The low-fat, low-calorie diethas
already been proven to fail. This
isthecruelhoax.Eatinglessdoesnotresulti
nlastingweightloss.It.Just.
Does.Not.Work.
It is cruel because so many of us
havebelieved it. It is cruel because all
of our“trusted
healthsources”tellusitistrue.
How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you
want to learn this special method than click here
It is cruel because when it fails,
weblame ourselves. Let me state it
asplainlyasIcan:“EatLess”
doesnotwork.That’safact.Acceptit.
Pharmaceutical methods of
caloricreduction only emphasize the
spectacularfailure of this paradigm.
Orlistat(marketed in the U.S. as Alli)
wasdesigned to block the absorption
ofdietary fat. Orlistat is the
drugequivalent of the low-fat, low-
caloriediet.
Amongitsnumeroussideeffects,themo
st bothersome was
euphemisticallycalled fecal leakage
and oily spotting.The unabsorbed
dietary fat came out theother end,
where it often
stainedunderwear.Weight-
lossforumschimed
in with useful advice about the
“orangepoopoil.” Neverwearwhite
pants.
Never assume it’s just a fart. In
2007,Alli won the “Bitter Pill Award”
forworst drug from the U.S.
consumergroup Prescription Access
Litigation.Thereweremoreseriousconce
rnssuchas liver toxicity, vitamin
deficiency andgallstones. However,
orlistat’sinsurmountable problem was
that it didnotreallywork.16
In a randomized, double-
blindcontrolled study,17four years of
takingthe medication three times daily
resultedin an extra 6 pounds (2.8
kilograms) ofweight loss. But 91
percent of thepatients complained of
side effects. Ithardlyseemedworththe
trouble.Sales
of the drug peaked in 2001 at
$600million. Despite being sold over
thecounter,by2013,saleshadplummetedt
o$100million.
The fake fat olestra was a
similarlyill-conceived notion, born out
ofcaloric-reduction theory. Released
togreat fanfare several years ago,
olestrawas not absorbed by the body
and thushad no caloric impact. Its sales
began tosink within two years of
release.18Theproblem? It led to no
significant weightloss. By 2010, it
landed on Timemagazine’s list of the
fifty
worstinventions,justbehindasbestos.19
(4)
THEEXERCISE
MYTH
DR. PETER ATTIAisthe cofounder
ofNutrition Science Initiative (NuSi),
anorganization dedicated to improving
thequality of science in nutrition
andobesity research. A few years ago,
hewas an elite long-distance swimmer,
oneof only a dozen or so people to
haveswum from Los Angeles to
CatalinaIsland. A physician himself, he
followedthe standard prescribed diet
high incarbohydrates and trained
religiously forthree to four hours daily.
He was also,by his own estimation,
about fortypounds (18 kilograms)
overweight
withabodymassindexof29and25percent
bodyfat.
Butisn’tincreasingexercisethekeytow
eightloss?
Caloricimbalance—
increasedcaloricintake combined with
decreased caloricexpenditure—is
considered the recipefor obesity. Up
until now, we’veassumed that exercise
was vitallyimportant to weight loss—
that byincreasing exercise, we can burn
off theexcesscaloriesthatweeat.
THE LIMITS OF EXERCISE:
AHARSHREALITY
CERTAINLY, EXERCISE HAS great
healthbenefits. The early Greek
physicianHippocrates, considered the
father ofmedicine, said, “If we could
give everyindividual the right amount
ofnourishment and exercise, not too
littleand not too much, we would have
foundthe safest way to health.” In the
1950s,along with increasing concern
aboutheartdisease,interestinphysicalacti
vity and exercise began to grow. In1955,
President Eisenhower
establishedthePresident’sCouncilonYout
hFitness.By 1966, the U.S. Public Health
Servicebegan to advocate that
increasingphysicalactivitywasoneoftheb
est
ways to lose weight. Aerobics
studiosbegan to sprout like
mushrooms after arainstorm.
The CompleteBook
ofRunningbyJimFixxbecamearunawayb
estsellerin1977. The fact that he died at
age fifty-two of a massive heart attack
was only
aminorsetbacktothecause.Dr.KennethCo
oper’s book The New Aerobics
wasrequired reading in the 1980s where
Iwent to high school. More and
morepeople began incorporating
physicalactivityintotheirleisuretime.
It seemed reasonable to
expectobesity rates to fall as exercise
ratesincreased.Afterall,governmentsaro
undthe world have poured millions
ofdollarsintopromotingexercisefor
weight loss, and they succeeded
ingettingtheircitizensmoving.IntheU
nitedKingdomfrom1997to2008,regu
lar exercise increased from
32percent to 39 percent in men and
21percentto29percentinwomen.1
There’s a problem, though. All
thisactivity had no effect on obesity at
all.Obesityincreasedrelentlessly,evenas
we sweated to the oldies. Just take
alookatFigure 4.1,2.
Figure4.1.
Theincreasingworldwideprevalenceof
obesity.
The phenomenon is global. A
recenteight-country survey revealed
thatAmericans exercised the most—
135days per year compared to a
globalaverage of 112 days. The Dutch
came
inlastat93days.3Weightlosswasthe
main motivation for exercise in
allcountries. Did all this activity
translateintolowerratesofobesity?
Glad you asked. The Dutch
andItalians, with their low exercise
rates,experienced less than one-third
theobesity of those iron-
pumpingAmericans.
The problem was apparent in
theAmerican NHANESdata as well.
From2001 to 2011, there was a
generalincrease in physical
activity.4Certainareas (Kentucky,
Virginia, Florida andthe Carolinas)
increased exercise atHerculean rates.
But here’s the
dismaltruth:whetherphysicalactivityinc
reasesordecreases,ithasvirtuallynorelat
ionshiptotheprevalenceof
obesity. Increasing exercise did
notreduceobesity.Itwasirrelevant.Certain
states exercised more. Other
statesexercised less. Obesity increased
by thesameamountregardless.
Is exercise important in
reducingchildhood obesity? The short
answer
isno.A2013paper5comparedthephysical
activity (measured usingaccelerometry)
of children aged three tofive years to
their weight. The
authorsconcludedthereisno
associationbetween activityand
obesity.
Whatwentwrong?
Inherent to the Calories In,
CaloriesOut theory is the idea that
reducedphysicalactivityplaysa keyrole
intheobesityepidemic.This ideais thatwe
Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise
than click here
used to walk everywhere, but now
wedrive. With the increase in
laborsavingdevices such as cars, our
exercise hasdecreased, leading to
obesity. Theproliferation of video
games, televisionand computers is also
believed
tocontributetoasedentarylifestyle.Likean
ygooddeception,thisonesoundspretty
reasonable at first. There is asmall
problem,though.Itisjustnottrue.
Researcher Dr. Herman
Pontzerstudied a hunter-gatherer society
living
aprimitivelifestyleinthemodernday.
TheHadzainTanzaniaoftentravel15to20mil
esperdaytogatherfood.Youmight assume
that their daily
energyexpenditureismuchhigherthanatypic
alofficeworker.Pontzerdiscussesthe
surprising results in a New York
Timesarticle: “We found that despite all
thisphysical activity, the number of
caloriesthat the Hadza burned per day
wasindistinguishable from that of
typicaladultsinEuropeandtheUnitedStates.
”6
Even if we compare relatively
recentactivity rates to those of the
1980s,before the obesity epidemic came
intofull swing, rates have not
decreasedappreciably.7In a Northern
Europeanpopulation, physical-activity
energyexpenditure was calculated from
the1980s to the mid 2000s. The
surprisingfinding was that if anything,
physicalactivity has actually increased
since
the1980s.Butthisstudy’sauthorswentone
stepfurther.Theycalculatedthe
predicted energy expenditure for a
wildmammal, which is
predominantlydetermined by body mass
and ambienttemperature. Compared to
its wild-
mammalcousinssuchastheseeminglyvigo
rous cougar, fox and caribou,
Homoobesus2015
isnotlessphysicallyactive.
Exercise has not decreased
sincehunter-
gatherertimes,orevensincethe1980s,whil
eobesityhasgallopedaheadfullsteam.Itish
ighlyimprobablethatdecreased exercise
played any role
incausingobesityinthefirstplace.
Iflackofexercisewasnotthe causeof
obesity epidemic, exercise
isprobablynotgoingtoreverseit.
CALORIESOUT
THE AMOUNT OFcalories used in a
day(Calories Out)is
moreaccuratelytermedtotalenergyexpen
diture.Totalenergy expenditure is the
sum of basalmetabolic rate (defined
below),thermogeniceffectoffood,non-
exerciseactivity thermogenesis, excess
post-exercise oxygen consumption and,
ofcourse,exercise.
Totalenergyexpenditure=Basalmetaboli
crate+Thermogeniceffectoffood +
Nonexercise activitythermogenesis +
Excess post-
exerciseoxygenconsumption+ Exercise.
The key point here is that total
energyexpenditure is not the same as
exercise.Theoverwhelmingmajorityoftot
al
energyexpenditureisnotexercisebutthe
basal metabolic rate:
metabolichousekeeping tasks such as
breathing,maintaining body temperature,
keepingtheheartpumping,maintainingthe
vitalorgans,brainfunction,liverfunction,k
idneyfunction,etc.
Let’stakeanexample.Basalmetabolic
rate for a lightly activeaverage male is
roughly 2500
caloriesperday.Walkingatamoderatepac
e(2miles per hour) for forty-five
minutesevery day, would burn roughly
104calories.Inotherwords,thatwillnotev
enconsume5 percentofthetotalenergy
expenditure. The vast majority(95
percent) of calories are used
forbasalmetabolism.
Basalmetabolicratedependsonmanyfact
ors,including
genetics,
gender(basalmetabolicrateisge
nerallyhigherinmen),
age(basalmetabolicrategenerallydr
opswithage),
weight (basal metabolic
rategenerallyincreaseswithmusclem
ass),
height (basal metabolic
rategenerally increases with
height),diet (overfeeding or
underfeeding),bodytemperature,
externaltemperature(heatingorco
olingthebody)and
organfunction.
Nonexercise activity thermogenesis
isthe energy used in activity other
thansleeping, eating or exercise; for
instance,inwalking,gardening,cooking,cl
eaningand shopping. The thermogenic
effect offood is the energy used in
digestion
andabsorptionoffoodenergy.Certainfood
s, such as dietary fat, are easilyabsorbed
and take very little energy tometabolize.
Proteins are harder
toprocessandusemoreenergy.
Thermogenic effect of food
variesaccordingtomealsize,mealfrequen
cyand macronutrient composition.
Excesspost-exercise oxygen
consumption (alsocalled after-burn) is
the energy used incellular repair,
replenishment of
fuelstoresandotherrecoveryactivitiesafte
r
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss
The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss

More Related Content

Similar to The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss

The diabetes cure (the 5 step plan to eliminate hunger, lose weight, and rev...
The diabetes cure  (the 5 step plan to eliminate hunger, lose weight, and rev...The diabetes cure  (the 5 step plan to eliminate hunger, lose weight, and rev...
The diabetes cure (the 5 step plan to eliminate hunger, lose weight, and rev...
Aqileditz
 
Sickly Sweet: electronic version.
Sickly Sweet: electronic version.Sickly Sweet: electronic version.
Sickly Sweet: electronic version.
Simon Thornley
 
Type 2 diabetes cause and cure
Type 2 diabetes cause and cureType 2 diabetes cause and cure
Type 2 diabetes cause and cure
Carl French
 
Red Light Therapy for Diabetes and Insulin Resistance
Red Light Therapy for Diabetes and Insulin ResistanceRed Light Therapy for Diabetes and Insulin Resistance
Red Light Therapy for Diabetes and Insulin Resistance
MarkSloan21
 
obesity presentation american hospital
obesity presentation american hospitalobesity presentation american hospital
obesity presentation american hospital
heba abou diab
 
Proteins
ProteinsProteins
food for a healthy life
food for a healthy lifefood for a healthy life
food for a healthy life
SiddeeqSiddeeq
 
May 2015 Health Newsletter from Poway Chiropractor Dr. Rode of Rode Chiroprac...
May 2015 Health Newsletter from Poway Chiropractor Dr. Rode of Rode Chiroprac...May 2015 Health Newsletter from Poway Chiropractor Dr. Rode of Rode Chiroprac...
May 2015 Health Newsletter from Poway Chiropractor Dr. Rode of Rode Chiroprac...
Rode Chiropractic of Poway, CA 92064 (858)-391-1372
 
Bio 100
Bio 100Bio 100
Bio 100
sal327
 
CHI-Obesity-White-Paper
CHI-Obesity-White-PaperCHI-Obesity-White-Paper
CHI-Obesity-White-Paper
Will Zasadny
 
Obesity Code Evaluation
Obesity Code EvaluationObesity Code Evaluation
Obesity Code Evaluation
NJohnPorter
 
Acupuncture weight loss
Acupuncture weight lossAcupuncture weight loss
Acupuncture weight loss
AlvinRoberts
 
Diabetes Destroyer
Diabetes Destroyer Diabetes Destroyer
Diabetes Destroyer
JLamor
 
Intermittent fasting, low carbohydrate high fat diet, exercise role in diabet...
Intermittent fasting, low carbohydrate high fat diet, exercise role in diabet...Intermittent fasting, low carbohydrate high fat diet, exercise role in diabet...
Intermittent fasting, low carbohydrate high fat diet, exercise role in diabet...
Joshua Chadwick Jayaraj
 
Keto-diet-with-type-1-diabetes-
 Keto-diet-with-type-1-diabetes- Keto-diet-with-type-1-diabetes-
Keto-diet-with-type-1-diabetes-
Ivan Gonzalez Marcos
 
The Diabetes Lies.pdf
The Diabetes Lies.pdfThe Diabetes Lies.pdf
The Diabetes Lies.pdf
Saúl Antonio Medina Fernadez
 

Similar to The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss (16)

The diabetes cure (the 5 step plan to eliminate hunger, lose weight, and rev...
The diabetes cure  (the 5 step plan to eliminate hunger, lose weight, and rev...The diabetes cure  (the 5 step plan to eliminate hunger, lose weight, and rev...
The diabetes cure (the 5 step plan to eliminate hunger, lose weight, and rev...
 
Sickly Sweet: electronic version.
Sickly Sweet: electronic version.Sickly Sweet: electronic version.
Sickly Sweet: electronic version.
 
Type 2 diabetes cause and cure
Type 2 diabetes cause and cureType 2 diabetes cause and cure
Type 2 diabetes cause and cure
 
Red Light Therapy for Diabetes and Insulin Resistance
Red Light Therapy for Diabetes and Insulin ResistanceRed Light Therapy for Diabetes and Insulin Resistance
Red Light Therapy for Diabetes and Insulin Resistance
 
obesity presentation american hospital
obesity presentation american hospitalobesity presentation american hospital
obesity presentation american hospital
 
Proteins
ProteinsProteins
Proteins
 
food for a healthy life
food for a healthy lifefood for a healthy life
food for a healthy life
 
May 2015 Health Newsletter from Poway Chiropractor Dr. Rode of Rode Chiroprac...
May 2015 Health Newsletter from Poway Chiropractor Dr. Rode of Rode Chiroprac...May 2015 Health Newsletter from Poway Chiropractor Dr. Rode of Rode Chiroprac...
May 2015 Health Newsletter from Poway Chiropractor Dr. Rode of Rode Chiroprac...
 
Bio 100
Bio 100Bio 100
Bio 100
 
CHI-Obesity-White-Paper
CHI-Obesity-White-PaperCHI-Obesity-White-Paper
CHI-Obesity-White-Paper
 
Obesity Code Evaluation
Obesity Code EvaluationObesity Code Evaluation
Obesity Code Evaluation
 
Acupuncture weight loss
Acupuncture weight lossAcupuncture weight loss
Acupuncture weight loss
 
Diabetes Destroyer
Diabetes Destroyer Diabetes Destroyer
Diabetes Destroyer
 
Intermittent fasting, low carbohydrate high fat diet, exercise role in diabet...
Intermittent fasting, low carbohydrate high fat diet, exercise role in diabet...Intermittent fasting, low carbohydrate high fat diet, exercise role in diabet...
Intermittent fasting, low carbohydrate high fat diet, exercise role in diabet...
 
Keto-diet-with-type-1-diabetes-
 Keto-diet-with-type-1-diabetes- Keto-diet-with-type-1-diabetes-
Keto-diet-with-type-1-diabetes-
 
The Diabetes Lies.pdf
The Diabetes Lies.pdfThe Diabetes Lies.pdf
The Diabetes Lies.pdf
 

Recently uploaded

CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 1_ANTI TB DRUGS.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 1_ANTI TB DRUGS.pdfCHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 1_ANTI TB DRUGS.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 1_ANTI TB DRUGS.pdf
rishi2789
 
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations   10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
Traumasoft LLC
 
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public HealthAgeing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
phuakl
 
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptxPost-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
FFragrant
 
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdfPollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
Chulalongkorn Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group
 
vonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentation
vonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentationvonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentation
vonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentation
Dr.pavithra Anandan
 
K CỔ TỬ CUNG.pdf tự ghi chép, chữ hơi xấu
K CỔ TỬ CUNG.pdf tự ghi chép, chữ hơi xấuK CỔ TỬ CUNG.pdf tự ghi chép, chữ hơi xấu
K CỔ TỬ CUNG.pdf tự ghi chép, chữ hơi xấu
HongBiThi1
 
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan PatroJune 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
Kanhu Charan
 
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptx
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptxCervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptx
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptx
LEFLOT Jean-Louis
 
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune DiseaseCell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Health Advances
 
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...
PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education
 
DECLARATION OF HELSINKI - History and principles
DECLARATION OF HELSINKI - History and principlesDECLARATION OF HELSINKI - History and principles
DECLARATION OF HELSINKI - History and principles
anaghabharat01
 
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.GawadHemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
NephroTube - Dr.Gawad
 
How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.
How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.
How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.
Gokuldas Hospital
 
CLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptx
CLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptxCLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptx
CLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptx
Government Dental College & Hospital Srinagar
 
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 4_ANTI VIRAL DRUGS.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 4_ANTI VIRAL DRUGS.pdfCHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 4_ANTI VIRAL DRUGS.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 4_ANTI VIRAL DRUGS.pdf
rishi2789
 
pharmacology for dummies free pdf download.pdf
pharmacology for dummies free pdf download.pdfpharmacology for dummies free pdf download.pdf
pharmacology for dummies free pdf download.pdf
KerlynIgnacio
 
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
Gokuldas Hospital
 
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdfTest bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
rightmanforbloodline
 
What are the different types of Dental implants.
What are the different types of Dental implants.What are the different types of Dental implants.
What are the different types of Dental implants.
Gokuldas Hospital
 

Recently uploaded (20)

CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 1_ANTI TB DRUGS.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 1_ANTI TB DRUGS.pdfCHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 1_ANTI TB DRUGS.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 1_ANTI TB DRUGS.pdf
 
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations   10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
 
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public HealthAgeing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
 
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptxPost-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
 
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdfPollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
 
vonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentation
vonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentationvonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentation
vonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentation
 
K CỔ TỬ CUNG.pdf tự ghi chép, chữ hơi xấu
K CỔ TỬ CUNG.pdf tự ghi chép, chữ hơi xấuK CỔ TỬ CUNG.pdf tự ghi chép, chữ hơi xấu
K CỔ TỬ CUNG.pdf tự ghi chép, chữ hơi xấu
 
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan PatroJune 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
 
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptx
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptxCervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptx
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptx
 
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune DiseaseCell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
 
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...
 
DECLARATION OF HELSINKI - History and principles
DECLARATION OF HELSINKI - History and principlesDECLARATION OF HELSINKI - History and principles
DECLARATION OF HELSINKI - History and principles
 
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.GawadHemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
 
How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.
How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.
How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.
 
CLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptx
CLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptxCLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptx
CLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptx
 
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 4_ANTI VIRAL DRUGS.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 4_ANTI VIRAL DRUGS.pdfCHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 4_ANTI VIRAL DRUGS.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 4_ANTI VIRAL DRUGS.pdf
 
pharmacology for dummies free pdf download.pdf
pharmacology for dummies free pdf download.pdfpharmacology for dummies free pdf download.pdf
pharmacology for dummies free pdf download.pdf
 
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
 
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdfTest bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
 
What are the different types of Dental implants.
What are the different types of Dental implants.What are the different types of Dental implants.
What are the different types of Dental implants.
 

The Obesity Code_ Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss

  • 1.
  • 3. Thisbookisdedi cated to mybeautifulwife ,Mina. Thank you for yourloveand thestrengthyougive me.Icouldnotdoitwi thoutyou,norwould Ieverwantto.
  • 6. PART 4: The Social Phenomenon of ObesityCHAPTER 11: Big Food, More Food and theNewScienceofDiabesity CHAPTER12:PovertyandObesity CHAPTER13:ChildhoodObesity PART 5: What’s Wrong with Our Diet?CHAPTER14:TheDeadlyEffectsofFructose CHAPTER 15: The Diet Soda DelusionCHAPTER16:CarbohydratesandProtect iveFiber CHAPTER17:ProteinCHAPTE R18:FatPhobia PART 6: The SolutionCHAPTER19:Whatto EatCHAPTER20:WhentoEat APPENDIXA:SampleMealPlans(withFastingProto cols) APPENDIXB:Fasting:APracticalGuide APPENDIXC:MeditationandSleepHygieneto
  • 8. FOREWORD DR. JASON FUNG IS a Torontophysician specializing in the care ofpatients with kidney diseases. His keyresponsibility is to oversee the complexmanagement of patients with end-stagekidney disease requiring renal (kidney)dialysis. His credentials do not obviouslyexplain why he should author a booktitledTheObesityCodeorwhyheblog son the intensive dietary management ofobesityandtype2diabetesmellitus.Toun derstand this apparent anomaly, weneed first to appreciate who this man isandwhatmakeshimsounusual. Intreatingpatientswithend-stage
  • 9. kidney disease, Dr. Fung learned twokey lessons. First, that type 2 diabetes isthe single commonest cause of kidneyfailure. Second, that renal dialysis,however sophisticated and even lifeprolonging,treatsonlythefinalsympto ms of an underlying disease thathasbeenpresentfortwenty,thirty,forty or perhaps even fifty years. Gradually, itdawned on Dr. Fung that he waspracticing medicine exactly as he hadbeen taught: by reactively treating thesymptoms of complex diseases withoutfirst trying to understand or correct theirrootcauses. He realized that to make a differencetohispatients,hewouldhavetos tartbyacknowledgingabittertruth:thatour
  • 10. venerated profession is no longerinterested in addressing the causes ofdisease. Instead,itwastesmuchofitstime and many of its resourcesattemptingtotreatsymptoms. He resolved to make a real differenceto his patients (and his profession) bystrivingtounderstandthetruecausesthatu nderliedisease. Before December 2014, I wasunaware of Dr. Jason Fung’s existence.Then one day I chanced upon his twolectures— “TheTwoBigLiesofType2Diabetes” and “How to Reverse Type 2DiabetesNaturally”— onYouTube.Assomeone
  • 11. withaspecialinterestintype 2diabetes, not least because I have theconditionmyself,Iwasnaturally
  • 12. intrigued. Who, I thought, is this brightyoung man? What gives him the certaintythat type 2 diabetes can be reversed“naturally”?And howcanhebebraveenough to accuse his noble profession oflying? He will need to present a goodargument,Ithought. It took only a few minutes to realizethat Dr. Fung is not only legitimate, butalso more than able to look after himselfin any medical scrap. The argument hepresented was one that had beenbouncingaround,unresolved,inmyo wnmind for at least three years. But I hadnever been able to see it with the sameclarity or to explain it with the sameemphaticsimplicityashadDr.Fung.B ytheendofhistwolectures,IknewthatI
  • 13. had observed a young master at work.Finally,IunderstoodwhatIhadmissed . What Dr. Fung achieved in those twolectures was to utterly destroy thecurrentlypopularmodelforthemedical management of type 2 diabetes— themodelmandatedbyallthedifferentdiab etes associations around the world.Worse,heexplainedwhythiserrone ousmodel of treatment must inevitably harmthehealthofallpatientsunfortunateen oughtoreceive it. According to Dr. Fung, the first big liein the management of type 2 diabetes isthe claim that it is a chronicallyprogressive disease that simply getsworse with time, even in those
  • 15. medicineoffers.But,Dr.Fungargues,this is simply not true. Fifty percent ofthepatientsonDr.Fung’sIntensiveDiet ary Management (IDM) program,which combines dietary carbohydraterestriction and fasting, are able to stopusinginsulinafterafewmonths. Sowhyareweunabletoacknowledge the truth? Dr. Fung’sanswerissimple:wedoctorslietoou rselves. If type 2 diabetes is a curabledisease but all our patients are gettingworse on the treatments we prescribe,then we must be bad doctors. And sincewedidnotstudyforsolongatsuchgreat cost to become bad doctors, this failurecannot be our fault. Instead, we
  • 17. patients, who must unfortunately besuffering from a chronically progressiveand incurable disease. It is not adeliberate lie, Dr. Fung concludes, butone of cognitive dissonance— theinabilityto acceptablatanttruthbecauseaccepting it would be too emotionallydevastating. Thesecondlie,accordingtoDr.Fung,is our belief that type 2 diabetes is adiseaseofabnormalbloodglucoselevels for which the only correcttreatment is progressively increasinginsulin dosages. He argues, instead, thattype 2 diabetes is a disease of insulinresistance with excessive insulinsecretion— incontrasttotype 1diabetes,aconditionoftrueinsulinlack. To treat
  • 18. How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you want to learn this special method than click here
  • 19. bothconditionsthesameway— byinjectinginsulin— makesnosense.Whytreat a condition of insulin excess withyet more insulin, he asks? That is theequivalentofprescribingalcoholforthet reatmentofalcoholism. Dr.Fung’snovelcontributionishisinsight that treatment in type 2 diabetesfocusesonthesymptomofthediseas e—anelevatedblood glucoseconcentration —rather than its root cause, insulinresistance. And the initial treatment forinsulin resistance is to limitcarbohydrate intake. Understanding thissimple biology explains why thisdiseasemaybereversibleinsomecases —and, conversely, why the
  • 21. notlimitcarbohydrateintake,worsensth eoutcome. But how did Dr. Fung arrive at theseoutrageous conclusions? And how didtheyleadtohisauthorshipofthisbook? In addition to his realization,described above, of the long- term natureof disease and the illogic of treating adisease’ssymptomsratherthanremovingit s cause, he also, almost by chance, inthe early 2000s, became aware of thegrowingliteratureonthebenefitsof low-carbohydrate diets in those withobesity and other conditions of insulinresistance. Taught to believe that acarbohydrate-restricted, high-fat dietkills, he was shocked to discover theopposite:thisdietarychoiceproduces
  • 22. a
  • 23. range of highly beneficial metabolicoutcomes, especiallyinthosewiththeworstinsulinresi stance. Andfinallycamethecherryonthetop —a legion of hidden studies showingthat for the reduction of body weight inthose with obesity (and insulinresistance), this high-fat diet is at leastas effective, and usually much more so,thanothermoreconventionaldiets. Eventually, he could bear it no longer.Ifeveryoneknows(butwon’tadmit) thatthe low-fat calorie-restricted diet isutterly ineffective in controlling bodyweight or in treating obesity, surely it istime to tell the truth: the best hope fortreating andpreventing
  • 25. excessiveinsulinproduction,mustsurely be the same low-carbohydrate,high-fat diet used for the management ofthe ultimate disease of insulin resistance,type 2 diabetes. And so this book wasborn. In The Obesity Code, Dr. Fung hasproduced perhaps the most importantpopularbookyetpublishedonthis topicofobesity. Its strengths are that it is based on anirrefutable biology, the evidence forwhich is carefully presented; and it iswrittenwiththeeaseandconfidenceofam aster communicator in an accessible,well-reasoned sequence so that itsconsecutive chapters systematicallydevelop,layerbylayer,ane vidence-
  • 26. based biological model of obesity thatmakes complete sense in its logicalsimplicity. It includes just enoughscience to convince the skepticalscientist,butnotsomuchthatitcon fusesthosewithoutabackgroundinbiology. This feat in itself is a stunningachievementthatfewscience writerseveraccomplish. Bytheendofthebook,thecarefulreader will understand exactly thecausesoftheobesityepidemic, whyourattempts to prevent both the obesity anddiabetes epidemics were bound to fail,and what, more importantly, are thesimple steps that those with a weightproblem need to take to reverse theirobesity.
  • 27. The solution needed is that which Dr.Fung has now provided: “Obesity is... amultifactorial disease. What we need isa framework, a structure, a coherenttheorytounderstandhowallitsfact orsfit together. Too often, our current modelof obesity assumes that there is only onesingle true cause, and that all others arepretenderstothethrone.Endlessdebate sensue...Theyare allpartiallycorrect.” In providing one such coherentframework that can account for most ofwhat we currently know about the realcauses of obesity, Dr. Fung has providedmuch,muchmore. Hehasprovidedablueprintfortherev ersal of the greatest medicalepidemicsfacingmodernsocie
  • 28. ty—
  • 29. epidemics that he shows are entirelypreventableandpotentiallyrever sible,but only if we truly understand theirbiological causes—not just theirsymptoms. The truth he expresses will one day beacknowledgedas self-evident. Thesoonerthatdaydawns,thebetterforus all. TIMOTHYNOAKESOMS,MBChB,MD,DSc,PhD (hc), FACSM, (hon) FFSEM (UK), (hon)FSEM(Ire) EMERITUSPROFESSOR UNIVERSITYOFCAPETOWN,CapeTown, SouthAfrica
  • 30. INTRODUCTION THE ART OF medicine is quite peculiar.Onceinawhile,medicaltreatm entsbecome established that don’t reallywork.Throughsheerinertia,theset reatments get handed down from onegeneration of doctors to the next andsurvive for a surprisingly long time,despitetheirlackofeffectiveness. Consider the medicinal use of leeches(bleeding)or,say,routinetonsillec tomy. Unfortunately, the treatment of obesityis also one such example. Obesity isdefinedintermsofaperson’sbodymassind ex,calculatedasaperson’sweightinkilogra ms divided by the square of theirheightinmeters.Abodymassindex
  • 31. greater than 30 is defined as obese. Formore than thirty years, doctors haverecommendedalow-fat,calorie- reduceddiet as the treatment of choice forobesity. Yet the obesity epidemicaccelerates. From 1985 to 2011, theprevalence of obesity in Canada tripled,from 6 percent to 18 percent.1Thisphenomenonisnotuniqueto NorthAmerica, but involves most of thenationsofthe world. Virtually every person who has usedcaloric reduction for weight loss hasfailed.And,really,whohasn’ttriedit? By every objective measure, thistreatment is completely and utterlyineffective.Yetitremainsthetreat mentofchoice,defendedvigorouslyby
  • 32. nutritionalauthorities. As a nephrologist, I specialize inkidney disease, the most common causeof which is type 2 diabetes with itsassociated obesity. I’ve often watchedpatients start insulin treatment for theirdiabetes, knowing that most will gainweight. Patients are rightly concerned.“Doctor,”theysay,“you’vealw aystoldmetoloseweight.Buttheinsulinyou gavememakesmegainsomuchweight.How isthishelpful?”Foralongtime,Ididn’thave agoodanswerforthem. Thatnagginguneasegrew.Likemanydoc tors, I believed that weight gain wasa caloric imbalance—eating too muchand movingtoo little. Butifthatwereso,whydidthemedicationIp rescribed—
  • 33. insulin—cause such relentless weightgain? Everybody, health professionals andpatients alike, understood that the rootcause of type 2 diabetes lay in weightgain. There were rare cases of highlymotivated patients who had lostsignificantamountsofweight.Theirtyp e2 diabeteswouldalsoreversecourse. Logically, since weight was theunderlying problem, it deservedsignificant attention. Still, it seemed thatthe health profession was not even theleast bit interested in treating it. I wasguiltyascharged.Despitehavingworke d for more than twenty years inmedicine,Ifoundthatmyownnutritionalk nowledgewasrudimentary,atbest.
  • 34. Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise than click here
  • 35. Treatment of this terrible disease— obesity—was left to large corporationslikeWeightWatchers,aswell asvarioushucksters and charlatans mostlyinterested in peddling the latest weight-loss “miracle.” Doctors were not evenremotely interested in nutrition. Instead,the medical profession seemed obsessedwith finding and prescribing the nextnewdrug: Youhavetype2diabetes?Here,letme giveyoua pill. You have high blood pressure?Here,letmegiveyoua pill. You have high cholesterol? Here,letme give youa pill.
  • 37. megiveyoua pill. But all along, we needed to treatobesity. We were trying to treat theproblems caused by obesity rather thanobesity itself. In trying to understand theunderlying cause of obesity, I eventuallyestablished the Intensive DietaryManagementClinicinToronto,Ca nada. The conventional view of obesity as acaloricimbalancedidnotmakesense. Caloric reduction had been prescribedfor the last fifty years with startlingineffectiveness. Reading books on nutrition was nohelp. That was mostly a game of
  • 38. “hesaid, she said,” with many quoting“authoritative”doctors.Forex ample,
  • 39. Dr. Dean Ornish says that dietary fat isbadandcarbohydratesaregood.Heisares pected doctor, so we should listen tohim. But Dr. Robert Atkins said dietaryfatisgoodandcarbohydratesarebad. Hewasalso arespecteddoctor, so weshouldlistentohim.Whoisright?Whois wrong? In the science of nutrition,there is rarely any consensus aboutanything: Dietaryfatisbad.No,dietaryfatisgood . There are good fats and badfats. Carbohydrates are bad. No,carbohydratesaregood.Therea regoodcarbsandbadcarbs. Youshouldeatmoremealsaday.
  • 40. No, you should eat fewer meals aday. Countyourcalories.No,caloriesd on’tcount. Milk is good for you. No, milk isbadforyou. Meatisgoodforyou.No,meatisbad foryou. Todiscovertheanswers,weneedtotur n to evidence-based medicine ratherthanvagueopinion. Literally thousands of books aredevoted to dieting and weight loss,usually written by doctors, nutritionists,personal trainers and other “healthexperts.” However, with a fewexceptions,rarelyismore thana
  • 42. thoughtsparedfortheactualcausesofobe sity.Whatmakesusgainweight? Whydowegetfat? Themajorproblemisthecompletelack of a theoretical framework forunderstanding obesity. Current theoriesare ridiculouslysimplistic,oftentakingonlyo nefactorintoaccount: Excesscaloriescauseobesity.E xcess carbohydrates causeobesity. Excess meat consumption causesobesity. Excess dietary fat causes obesity.Toolittleexercisecausesobe sity.
  • 44. multifactorial, and these factors are notmutually exclusive. They may allcontribute to varying degrees. Forexample, heart disease has numerouscontributing factors—family history,gender, smoking, diabetes, highcholesterol, high blood pressure and alack of physical activity, to name only afew— andthatfactiswellaccepted.Butsuchisnott hecase inobesityresearch. Theothermajorbarriertounderstanding is the focus on short-termstudies. Obesity usually takes decades tofully develop. Yet we often rely oninformation about it from studies that areonly of several weeks’ duration. If westudyhowrustdevelops,wewouldneedt oobservemetaloveraperiodofweeks
  • 45. tomonths,nothours.Obesity,similarly,is a long-term disease. Short- termstudiesmaynotbeinformative. While I understand that the research isnot always conclusive, I hope this book,which draws on what I’ve learned overtwenty years of helping patients withtype 2 diabetes lose weight permanentlyto manage their disease, will provide astructuretobuildupon. Evidence-based medicine does notmean taking every piece of low- qualityevidence at face value. I often readstatements such as “low-fat diets provento completely reverse heart disease.”The reference will be a study of fiverats. That hardly qualifies as evidence. Iwillreferenceonlystudiesdoneon
  • 46. humans, and mostly only those that havebeen published in high-quality, peer-reviewed journals. No animal studieswill be discussed in this book. Thereason for this decision can beillustratedin“TheParableoftheCow”: Two cows were discussing the latestnutritional research, which had beendoneonlions.Onecowsaystotheother, “Did you hear that we’ve been wrongthese last 200 years? The latest researchshows that eating grass is bad for youandeatingmeatisgood.”Sothetwocow s began eating meat. Shortlyafterward,theygotsickandtheydie d. One year later, two lions werediscussing the latest nutritional
  • 48. to the other that the latest researchshowed that eating meat kills you andeating grass is good. So, the two lionsstartedeatinggrass,andtheydied. What’s the moral of the story? We arenot mice. We are not rats. We are notchimpanzeesorspidermonkeys.Wear ehumanbeings,andthereforeweshouldco nsider only human studies. I aminterested in obesity in humans, notobesity in mice. As much as possible, Itrytofocusoncausalfactorsratherthanass ociation studies. It is dangerous toassume that because two factors areassociated,oneisthecauseoftheother. Witness the hormone replacementtherapy disaster in post-
  • 49. menopausalwomen.Hormonereplaceme nttherapy How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you want to learn this special method than click here
  • 50. wasassociatedwithlowerheartdisease,bu tthatdidnotmeanthatitwasthecauseoflow erheartdisease. However, in nutritional research, it isnotalwayspossibletoavoidassociationst udies, as they are often the bestavailableevidence. Part 1 of this book, “The Epidemic,”explores the timeline of the obesityepidemic and the contribution of thepatient’sfamilyhistory,andshowshowbo thshedlightontheunderlyingcauses. Part 2, “The Calorie Deception,”reviews the current caloric theory indepth, including exercise andoverfeedingstudies.Theshortcomin gsof the current understanding of obesityarehighlighted.
  • 51. Part 3, “A New Model of Obesity,”introducesthehormonaltheoryo fobesity, a robust explanation of obesityas a medical problem. These chaptersexplain the central role of insulin inregulatingbodyweightanddescribethev itally important role of insulinresistance. Part 4, “The Social Phenomenon ofObesity,” considers how hormonalobesity theory explains some of theassociationsofobesity.Whyisobesity associated with poverty? What can wedoaboutchildhoodobesity? Part 5, “What’s Wrong with OurDiet?,”explorestheroleoffat,protein and carbohydrates, the
  • 53. addition, we examine one of the mainculprits in weight gain— fructose— andtheeffectsofartificialsweeteners. Part 6, “The Solution,” providesguidelines for lasting treatment ofobesity by addressing the hormonalimbalance of high blood insulin. Dietaryguidelines for reducing insulin levelsinclude reducing added sugar andrefined grains, keeping proteinconsumption moderate, and addinghealthy fat and fiber. Intermittent fastingis an effective way to treat insulinresistance without incurring the negativeeffects of calorie reduction diets. Stressmanagement and sleep improvement canreducecortisollevelsandcontrolinsuli
  • 54. n.
  • 55. The Obesity Code will set forth aframework for understanding thecondition of human obesity. Whileobesity shares many importantsimilarities and differences with type 2diabetes,this is primarilyabookaboutobesity. The process of challenging currentnutritional dogma is, at times, unsettling,butthehealthconsequencesaret ooimportant to ignore. What actuallycauses weight gain and what can we doabout it? This question is the overalltheme of this book. A fresh frameworkfortheunderstandingandtreatm entofobesity represents a new hope for ahealthierfuture.
  • 58. (1)
  • 59. HOWOBESITY BECAMEANEPIDEMIC Ofalltheparasitesthataf fecthumanity,Idonotkn owof,norcanIimagine, anymoredistressingtha nthatofObesity. WILLIAMBANTING HERE’S THE QUESTIONthat has alwaysbotheredme:Whyaretheredoctors whoare fat? Accepted as authorities inhumanphysiology,doctorsshouldbetrue expertsonthecausesandtreatmentsof obesity. Most doctors are also veryhardworking and self-disciplined. Sincenobodywantstobefat,doctorsin
  • 60. particular should have both theknowledge and the dedication to staythinandhealthy. Sowhyaretherefatdoctors? The standard prescription for weightlossis“EatLess,MoveMore.”Itsou nds perfectly reasonable. But whydoesn’titwork?Perhapspeoplewanti ngto lose weight are not following thisadvice.Themindiswilling,buttheflesh is weak. Yet consider the self- disciplineand dedication needed to complete anundergraduate degree, medical school,internship,residencyandfellowshi p.Itis hardly conceivable that overweightdoctors simply lack the willpower tofollowtheirownadvice. Thisleavesthepossibilitythatthe
  • 61. conventional advice is simply wrong.And if it is, then our entire understandingofobesityisfundamentallyf lawed. Given the current epidemic of obesity, Isuspect that such is the most likelyscenario. So we need to start at the verybeginning, with a thorough understandingofthediseasethatishumanob esity. Wemuststartwiththesinglemostimport antquestionregardingobesityoranydisea se:“Whatcausesit?”Wespend no time considering this crucialquestion because we think we alreadyknow the answer. It seems so obvious:it’s a matter of Calories In versusCaloriesOut. Acalorieisaunitoffood
  • 63. breathing,buildingnewmuscleandbone, pumping blood and othermetabolic tasks. Some food energy isstored as fat. Calories In is the foodenergy that we eat. Calories Out is theenergyexpendedforallofthesevarious metabolicfunctions. Whenthenumberofcalorieswetakein exceeds the number of calories weburn, weight gain results, we say. Eatingtoo much and exercising too little causesweight gain, we say. Eating too manycaloriescausesweightgain,wesay. These “truths” seem so self-evident thatwe do not question whether they areactuallytrue.Butarethey?
  • 64. PROXIMATEVERSUSULTIMATECA USE EXCESS CALORIES MAY certainly be theproximatecauseofweightgain,butnot itsultimatecause. What’s the difference betweenproximateandultimate?Theprox imatecauseisimmediatelyresponsible,w hereas the ultimate cause is whatstartedthechainofevents. Consider alcoholism. What causesalcoholism? The proximate cause is“drinkingtoomuchalcohol”— whichisundeniably true, but not particularlyuseful.Thequestionandthecau sehereareoneandthesame,sincealcoholis mmeans “drinking too much alcohol.”Treatmentadvicedirectedagain
  • 65. stthe
  • 66. proximate cause—“Stop drinking somuchalcohol”—isnotuseful. Thecrucialquestion,theonethatweare really interested in, is: What is theultimate cause of why alcoholismoccurs.Theultimatecauseincl udes the addictive nature of alcohol,anyfamilyhistoryofalcoh olism,excessive stress in the homesituationand/or anaddictive personality. There we have the real disease, andtreatment must be directed against theultimate,ratherthantheproximatecause. Understandingtheultimatecauseleadstoeff
  • 67. ectivetreatmentssuchas(inthis Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise than click here
  • 68. case) rehabilitation and social supportnetworks. Let’stakeanotherexample.Whydoesa plane crash? The proximate cause is,“there was not enough lift to overcomegravity”—again, absolutely true, but notin any way useful. The ultimate causemightbe human error,mechanical fault and/orinclementweathe r. Understandingtheultimatecauseleads to effective solutions such asbetter pilot training or tightermaintenance schedules. Advice
  • 70. wings,morepowerfulengines)willnotre duce plane crashes. This understanding applies toeverything. For instance, why is it so hotinthisroom? PROXIMATE CAUSE: Heat energycominginisgreaterthanheatener gyleaving. SOLUTION: Turn on the fans to increasetheamountofheatleaving. ULTIMATECAUSE:Thethermostatissettoo high. SOLUTION: Turn down the thermostat.Whyistheboatsinking? PROXIMATE CAUSE: Gravity is strongerthanbuoyancy. SOLUTION:Reducegravitybylig hteningtheboat.
  • 71. ULTIMATECAUSE:Theboathasalargeholei nthehull. SOLUTION:Patchthehole. In each case, the solution to theproximate cause of the problem isneitherlastingnormeaningful.Bycontras t,treatmentoftheultimatecauseisfarmore successful. Thesameappliestoobesity:Whatca usesweightgain? Proximatecause:Consumingmorecalori es thanyouexpend. If more calories in than out is theproximatecause,theunspokenanswerto that last question is that the ultimatecause is “personal choice.” We chooseto eat chips instead of broccoli. WechoosetowatchTVinsteadofexercise.
  • 72. Through this reasoning, obesity istransformed from a disease that needs tobe investigated and understood into apersonal failing,acharacter defect. Insteadofsearchingfortheultimatecau se of obesity, we transform theprobleminto eating too much (gluttony) and/orexercisingtoolittle(sloth). Gluttony and sloth are two of theseven deadly sins. So we say of theobese that they “brought it onthemselves.” They “let themselves go.”It gives us the comforting illusion thatwe understand ultimate cause of theproblem.Ina2012onlinepoll,161
  • 73. percent of U.S. adults believed that“personal choices about eating andexercise” were responsible fortheobesity epidemic. So we discriminateagainstpeoplewhoareobese .Webothpityandloathethem. However, on simple reflection, thisidea simply cannot be true. Prior topuberty,boysandgirlsaveragethesame body-fat percentage. After puberty,women on average carry close to 50percent more body fat than men. Thischange occurs despite the fact that menconsume more calories on average thanwomen.Butwhyis thistrue? What is the ultimate cause? It hasnothingtodowithpersonalchoices.Itisn otacharacterdefect.Womenarenot
  • 74. moregluttonousorlazierthanmen.Thehorm onal cocktail that differentiates menand women must make it more likely thatwomen will accumulate excess caloriesasfatasopposedtoburningthemoff. Pregnancy also induces significantweightgain.Whatistheultimatec ause?Again, it is obviously the hormonalchangesresultingfromthepregnan cy —not personal choice—that encouragesweightgain. Having erred in understanding theproximate and ultimate causes, webelievethesolutiontoobesityis toeatfewercalories. The“authorities”allagree.TheU.S.Dep artment of Agriculture’s DietaryGuidelinesforAmericans,updated
  • 75. in
  • 76. 2010, forcefully proclaims its keyrecommendation:“Controltotalcalo rieintaketomanagebodyweight.”TheCen ters for Disease Control2exhortpatients to balance their calories. TheadvicefromtheNationalInstitutesof Health’s pamphlet “Aim for a HealthyWeight”is“tocutdownonthenum berof calories... they get from food andbeverages and increase their physicalactivity.”3 Allthisadviceformsthefamous“EatLe ss, Move More” strategy so belovedby obesity “experts.” But here’s apeculiar thought: If we alreadyunderstand what causes obesity, how totreat it, and we’ve spent millions
  • 79. ANATOMYOFANEPIDEMIC WEWEREN’TALWAYSsoobsessedwithcalorie s. Throughout most of humanhistory,obesityhasbeenrare. Individuals in traditional societies eatingtraditional diets seldom became obese,even in times of abundant food. Ascivilizationsdeveloped,obesityfollow ed. Speculating on the cause,many identified the refinedcarbohydratesofsugarandstarches . Sometimes considered the father of thelow- carbohydrate diet, Jean AnthelmeBrillat-Savarin (1755–1826) wrote theinfluential textbook The Physiology ofTaste in 1825. There he wrote: “Thesecond of the chief causes of obesity
  • 81. manmakestheprimeingredientsofhisdaily nourishment. As we have saidalready, all animals that live onfarinaceous food grow fat willy- nilly;andmanisnoexceptiontotheuniversa llaw.”4 All foods can be divided into threedifferent macronutrient groups: fat,protein and carbohydrates. The “macro”in“macronutrients”referstothefa ctthatthebulkofthefoodweeatismadeupoft hese three groups. Micronutrients,which make up a very small proportionof the food, include vitamins andmineralssuchasvitaminsA,B,C,D,Ean d K, as well as minerals such as ironandcalcium.Starchyfoodsandsugarsa
  • 83. Severaldecadeslater,WilliamBanting (1796–1878), an Englishundertaker, rediscovered the fatteningpropertiesoftherefinedcarbohyd rate.In1863,hepublishedthepamphletLett eron Corpulence, Addressed to thePublic, which is often considered theworld’s first diet book. His story israther unremarkable. He was not anobese child, nor did he have a familyhistory of obesity. In his mid- thirties,however, he started to gain weight. Notmuch; perhaps a pound or two per year.By age sixty-two, he stood five foot fiveandweighed202pounds(92kilograms ).Perhaps unremarkable by modernstandards, he was considered quiteportlyatthetime.Distressed,hesought
  • 84. How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you want to learn this special method than click here
  • 85. adviceonweightlossfromhisph ysicians. First,hetriedtoeatless,butthatonlyleft him hungry. Worse, he failed to loseweight. Next, he increased his exerciseby rowing along the River Thames, nearhishomeinLondon.Whilehisphysicalf itness improved, he developed a“prodigious appetite, which I wascompelled to indulge.”5Still, he failedtolose weight. Finally,ontheadviceofhissurgeon,Banti ngtriedanewapproach.Withtheideathatsug aryand starchyfoodswerefattening, he strenuously avoided allbreads,milk,beer,sweetsandpotatoesth at had previously made up a largeportionofhis diet.(Todaywewould
  • 86. call this diet low in refinedcarbohydrates.) William Banting notonly lost the weight and kept it off, buthe also felt so well that he wascompelledtowritehisfamouspamphle t.Weight gain, he believed, resulted fromeating too many “fatteningcarbohydrates.” Formostofthenextcentury,diets lowin refined carbohydrates were acceptedas the standard treatment for obesity. Bythe 1950s, it was fairly standard advice.If you were to ask your grandparentswhat caused obesity, they would not talkabout calories. Instead, they would tellyou to stop eating sugary and starchyfoods. Common sense and empiricobservationservedtoconfirmthetr uth.
  • 87. Nutritional“experts”andgovernmento pinionwere notneeded. Caloriecountinghadbegunintheearly 1900s with the book Eat Your Wayto Health, written by Dr. Robert HughRose as a “scientific system of weightcontrol.” That book was followed up in1918 with the bestseller Diet andHealth,withKeytotheCalories,writte n by Dr. Lulu Hunt Peters, anAmerican doctor and newspapercolumnist. Herbert Hoover, then the headof the U.S. Food Administration,convertedtocaloriecount ing.Dr.Petersadvised patients to start with a fast, oneto two days abstaining from all foods,and then stick strictly to 1200 caloriesperday.Whiletheadvicetofastwas
  • 88. quicklyforgotten,moderncalorie- counting schedules are not verydifferent. By the 1950s, a perceived “greatepidemic” of heart disease wasbecominganincreasingpublicconcer n.Seemingly healthy Americans weredeveloping heart attacks with growingregularity. In hindsight, it should havebeen obvious that there was really nosuchepidemic. The discovery of vaccines andantibiotics, combined with increasedpublic sanitation, had reshaped themedical landscape. Formerly lethalinfections, such as pneumonia,tuberculosis and gastrointestinalinfections,becamecu rable.Heart
  • 89. disease and cancer now caused arelatively greater percentage of deaths,giving rise to some of the publicmisperception of an epidemic. (SeeFigure 1.1.6) Figure1.1.CausesofdeathintheUnitedS tates1900vs.1960. The increase in life expectancy from1900to1950reinforcedthepercepti
  • 90. on
  • 91. of a coronary-disease epidemic. For awhite male, the life expectancy in 1900was fifty years.7By 1950, it hadreached sixty-six years, and by 1970,almost sixty-eight years. If people werenot dying of tuberculosis, then theywould live long enough to develop theirheart attack. Currently, the average ageat first heart attack is sixty-six years.8The risk of a heart attack in a fifty-year-old man is substantially lower than in asixty-eight-year-old man. So the naturalconsequence of a longer life expectancyisanincreasedrateofcoronary disease. Butallgreatstories needavillain, and dietary fat was cast into that
  • 92. role.Dietary fat was thought to increase theamountofcholesterol,afattysubstance
  • 93. that is thought to contribute to heartdisease, in the blood. Soon, physiciansbegantoadvocate lower- fatdiets.Withgreat enthusiasm and shaky science, thedemonization of dietary fat began inearnest. There was a problem, though wedidn’t see it at the time. The threemacronutrients are fat, protein andcarbohydrates: lowering dietary fatmeantreplacingitwitheitherproteinorc arbohydrates. Since many high- proteinfoods like meat and dairy are also highin fat, it is difficult to lower fat in thedietwithoutloweringproteinaswell. So,ifone were torestrictdietaryfats,then one must increase dietarycarbohydrates
  • 95. developed world, these carbohydratesalltendtobehighlyrefine d. Low Fat = High CarbohydrateThisdilemmacreate dsignificant cognitive dissonance. Refinedcarbohydrates could not simultaneouslybe both good (because they are low infat)andbad(becausetheyarefattening).T he solution adopted by most nutritionexperts was to suggest thatcarbohydrateswerenolongerfattenin g.Instead,calorieswerefattening.Without evidence or historical precedent, it wasarbitrarily decided that excess caloriescausedweightgain,notspecificfo ods.
  • 97. In/Calories-Out model began to displacethe prevailing “fattening carbohydrates”model. But not everybody bought in. One ofthe most famous dissidents was theprominent British nutritionist JohnYudkin (1910–1995). Studying diet andheart disease, he found no relationshipbetween dietary fat and heart disease.Hebelievedthatthemainculpritof bothobesity and heart disease was sugar.9,10His 1972 book, Pure, White andDeadly:HowSugarIsKilling Us,iseerily prescient (and should certainlywin the award for Best Book TitleEver). Scientific debate raged back andforth about whether the culprit
  • 99. THEDIETARYGUIDELINES THE ISSUEWASfinallysettledin1977,notby scientific debate and discovery, butby governmental decree. GeorgeMcGovern, then chairman of the UnitedStates Senate Select Committee onNutrition and Human Needs, convened atribunal, and after several days ofdeliberation, it was decided thathenceforth, dietary fat was guilty ascharged. Not only was dietary fat guiltyof causing heart disease, but it alsocaused obesity,sincefatiscaloricallydense. The resulting declaration became theDietaryGoalsfortheUnitedStates.Ane ntire nation, and soon the entire world,wouldnowfollownutritionaladvice
  • 100. from a politician. This was a remarkablebreak from tradition. For the first time, agovernment institution intruded into thekitchens of America. Mom used to tell uswhat we should and should not eat. Butfrom now on, Big Brother would betelling us. And he said, “Eat less fat andmorecarbohydrates.” Severalspecificdietarygoalsweresetf orth.Theseincluded raiseconsumptionofcarbohydratesu ntiltheyconstituted55percentto60pe rcent ofcalories,anddecrease fat consumption fromapproximately 40 percent ofcalories to 30 percent, of which nomorethanone- thirdshouldcome
  • 101. Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise than click here
  • 102. fromsaturatedfat. With no scientific evidence, theformerly “fattening”carbohydratemadeastunningtra nsformation.Whiletheguidelines still recognized the evils ofsugar, refined grain was as innocent as anuninaconvent.Itsnutritionalsinswereex onerated, and it was henceforth rebornandbaptizedasthehealthywholegrai n. Was there any evidence? It hardlymattered. The goals were now thenutritionalorthodoxy.Everythingelse was heathen. If you didn’t toe the line,you were ridiculed. The DietaryGuidelinesforAmericans,
  • 104. recommendations of the McGovernreportclosely.Thenutritionalla ndscapeoftheworldwas foreverchanged. TheDietaryGuidelinesforAmericans, now updated every fiveyears, spawned the infamous foodpyramidinallitscounterfactualglory. The foods that formed the base of thepyramid— thefoodsweshouldeateverysingleday— werebreads,pastasand potatoes. These were the precisefoods that we had previously avoided tostaythin.Forexample,theAmericanHear tAssociation’s1995pamphlet,TheAmeri can Heart Association Diet: AnEatingPlan forHealthyAmericans,declared we should eat six or
  • 106. starchy vegetables (that) are low in fatand cholesterol.” To drink, “Choose...fruit punches, carbonated soft drinks.”Ahhh. White bread and carbonated softdrinks—the dinner of champions. Thankyou,AmericanHeartAssociation(AH A). Entering this brave new world,Americans tried to comply with thenutritionalauthoritiesofthedayandmad e a conscious effort to eat less fat,less red meat, fewer eggs and morecarbohydrates. When doctors advisedpeople to stop smoking, rates droppedfrom33percentin1979to25perce ntby1994. When doctors said to controlblood pressure and cholesterol, therewas a 40 percent decline in high
  • 108. cholesterol. When the AHA told us to eatmore bread and drink more juice, we atemorebreadanddrankmorejuice. Inevitably, sugar consumptionincreased. From 1820 to 1920, newsugar plantations in the Caribbean andAmerican South increased theavailability of sugar in the U.S. Sugarintakeplateauedfrom1920to1977 . Eventhough“avoidtoomuchsugar”was anexplicitgoalofthe1977DietaryGuideli nes for Americans, consumptionincreasedanywayuntiltheye ar2000. With all our attention focused on fat, wetookoureyesofftheball.Everythingwas “lowfat”or“lowcholesterol,”andnobody
  • 110. increasedtheaddedsugarsinprocessedfood forflavor. Refined grain consumption increasedby almost 45 percent. Sincecarbohydrates in North America tendedto be refined, we ate more and morelow- fatbreadandpasta,notcauliflowerandkal e.11 Success! From 1976 to 1996, theaverage fat intake decreased from 45percentofcaloriesto35percent.Butterco nsumptiondecreased 38 percent. Animal protein decreased 13 percent.Egg consumption decreased 18 percent.Grains andsugarsincreased.
  • 111. Figure1.2.Increaseinobeseandextre melyobeseUnitedStatesadultsaged2 0–74. Until that point, the widespreadadoption of the low-fat diet wascompletelyuntested.Wehadnoideawh at effect it would have on humanhealth. But we had the fatal conceit thatwe were somehow smarter than 200,000yearsofMotherNature.So,turnin
  • 112. g
  • 113. away from the natural fats, we embracedrefined low-fat carbohydrates such asbread and pasta. Ironically, theAmerican Heart Association, even aslate as the year 2000, felt that low- carbohydratedietsweredangerousfads,de spitethefactthatthesedietshadbeeninusea lmostcontinuouslysince1863. Whatwastheresult?Theincidenceofhea rt disease certainly did not decreaseas expected. But there was definitely aconsequencetothisdietarymanipulation — anunintentionalone.Ratesofobesity,define d as having a body mass indexgreater than 30, dramatically increased,starting almost exactly in 1977, asillustratedbyFigure 1.2.12 Theabruptincreaseinobesitybegan
  • 114. exactly with the officially sanctionedmove toward a low-fat, high- carbohydrate diet. Was it merecoincidence?Perhapsthefaultlayinou rgeneticmakeupinstead.
  • 115. (2)
  • 116. INHERITING OBESITY IT IS FAIRLYobvious that obesity runs infamilies.1Obese children often haveobese siblings. Obese children becomeobese adults.2Obese adults go on tohaveobesechildren.Childhoodobesityi s associated with a 200 percent to 400percent increased risk of adult obesity.This is an undeniable fact. Thecontroversy revolves around whetherthis trend is a genetic or anenvironmental problem—the classicnatureversusnurturedebate. Familiessharegeneticcharacteristics that may lead to obesity.
  • 118. the1970s.Ourgenescouldnothavecha ngedwithinsuchashorttime. Geneticscanexplainmuchoftheinter- individual risk of obesity, but not whyentirepopulationsbecomeobese. Nonetheless, families live in the sameenvironment,eatsimilarfoodsatsimi lartimesandhavesimilar attitudes. Families often share cars, live in thesamephysicalspaceandwillbeexpose dtothesamechemicalsthatmaycause obesity—so-called chemicalobesogens. For these reasons, manyconsider the current environment themajorcauseofobesity. Conventional calorie-based theoriesof obesity place the blame squarely onthis“toxic”environmentthatencourages
  • 119. How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you want to learn this special method than click here Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise than click here
  • 120. eating and discourages physicalexertion. Dietary and lifestyle habitshavechangedconsiderablysincet he1970sincluding adoption of a low-fat, high- carbohydrate diet,increased number of eatingopportunitiesperday, moremealseatingout,more fast-food restaurants,more time spent in cars andvehicles, increased popularityofvideosgames, increased use of computers,increasein dietary sugar,increaseduseofhigh-
  • 122. syrupand increased portionsizes. Anyorallofthesefactorsmaycontribute to the obesogenicenvironment. Therefore, most moderntheories of obesity discount theimportanceofgeneticfactors,believin ginstead that consumption of excesscalories leads to obesity. Eating andmoving are voluntary behaviors, afterall,withlittlegeneticinput. So— exactlyhowmuchofaroledoesgeneticsplayi nhumanobesity?
  • 123. NATUREVERSUSNURTURE THE CLASSIC METHODfor determining therelative impact of genetic versusenvironmental factors is to studyadoptive families, thereby removinggeneticsfromtheequation.Byco mparing adoptees to their biologicaland adoptive parents, the relativecontribution of environmental influencescan be isolated. Dr. Albert J. Stunkardperformed some of the classic geneticstudies of obesity.3Data aboutbiological parents is often incomplete,confidential and not easily accessible byresearchers. Fortunately, Denmark hasmaintained a relatively complete registryof adoptions, with information on bothsetsofparents.
  • 124. Studyingasampleof540Danishadultado ptees, Dr. Stunkard compared themto both their adoptive and biologicalparents. If environmental factors weremost important, then adoptees shouldresemble their adoptive parents. Ifgenetic factors were most important, theadoptees should resemble theirbiologicalparents. Norelationshipwhatsoeverwasdiscover ed betweentheweightoftheadoptiveparentsa ndtheadoptees. Whetheradoptiveparentswerethinorfat made no difference to the eventualweight of the adopted child. Theenvironment provided by the adoptiveparentswaslargelyirrelevant. Thisfindingwasaconsiderable
  • 125. shock. Standard calorie-based theoriesblame environmental factors and humanbehaviors for obesity. Environmentalcues such as dietary habits, fast food,junkfood,candyintake,lackofexerci se,number of cars, and lack of playgroundsandorganizedsportsarebelie vedcrucialinthedevelopmentofobesity. Buttheyplayvirtuallyno role. Infact,the fattest adoptees had the thinnestadoptive parents. Comparing adoptees to theirbiologicalparentsyieldedaconsider ablydifferentresult.Heretherewas a strong, consistent correlationbetween their weights. The biologicalparents had very little or nothing to dowithraisingthesechildren,orteaching
  • 126. themnutritionalvaluesorattitudestoward exercise. Yet the tendencytoward obesity followed them likeducklings. When you took a child awayfromobeseparentsandplacedthemint oa “thin” household, the child stillbecame obese. Whatwasgoingon? Studying identical twins raised apartis another classic strategy to distinguishenvironmentalandgeneticfac tors. Identicaltwinsshareidenticalgeneticm aterial, and fraternal twins share 25percentoftheirgenes. In1991, Dr. Stunkard examined sets of fraternal andidentical twins in both conditions ofbeing reared apart and reared together.4Comparisonoftheirweightswo
  • 127. uld
  • 128. determine the effect of the differentenvironments. The results sent ashockwave through the obesity- researchcommunity. Approximately 70 percent ofthevariance inobesityisfamilial. Seventypercent. Seventypercentofyourtendencytogai n weight is determined by yourparentage. Obesity is overwhelminglyinherited. However, it is immediately clear thatinheritance cannot be the sole factorleading to the obesity epidemic. Theincidenceofobesityhasbeenrelativel ystable through the decades. Most of theobesityepidemicmaterializedwithina single generation. Our genes have notchangedinthattimespan.Howcanwe
  • 130. THETHRIFTY- GENEHYPOTHESIS THE FIRST ATTEMPTto explain the geneticbasis of obesity was the thrifty- genehypothesis, which became popular in the1970s. This hypothesis assumes that allhumans are evolutionarily predisposedtogainweightasasurvivalmec hanism. Theargumentgoessomethinglikethis: In Paleolithic times, food wasscarceanddifficulttoobtain.Hungeri sone of the most powerful and basic ofhuman instincts. The thrifty genecompels us to eat as much as possible,and this genetic predisposition to gainweighthadasurvivaladvantage. Increasingthebody’sfoodstores(fat)permitt
  • 132. scarce or no food. Those who tended toburnthecaloriesinsteadofstoringthem were selectively wiped out. However,thethriftygeneisilladaptedtothe modern all-you-can-eat world, as itcauses weight gain and obesity. But weare simply following our genetic urge togainfat. Likeadecomposingwatermelon,thishyp othesisseemsquitereasonableonthesurfac e. Cut a little deeper, and you findthe rotten core. This theory has longceasedtobetaken seriously.However,it is still mentioned in the media, and soits flaws bear some examination. Themost obvious problem is that survival inthe wild depends on not being eitherunderweightoroverweight.Afatani
  • 133. mal
  • 134. is slower and less agile than its leanerbrethren.Predatorswouldpreferenti allyeat the fatter prey over the harder-to- catch, lean prey. By the same token, fatpredators would find it much moredifficulttocatchleanandswiftprey. Body fatness does not always provide asurvival advantage, but instead can be asignificant disadvantage. How manytimes have you seen a fat zebra orgazelle on the National Geographicchannel?Whataboutfatlionsa ndtigers? Theassumptionthathumansaregenetica lly predisposed to overeat isincorrect. Just as there are hormonalsignals of hunger, there are multiplehormonesthattelluswhenwe’refu llandstopusfromovereating.Consider
  • 135. the all-you-can-eat buffet. It isimpossibletosimplyeatandeatwithoutst opping because we get “full.”Continuing to eat may make us becomesickandthrowup.Thereisnogeneti cpredisposition to overeating. There is,instead, powerful built-in protectionagainstit. The thrifty-gene hypothesis assumeschronic food shortages preventedobesity. However, many traditionalsocieties had plentiful food year round.Forexample,theTokelau,aremotet ribein the South Pacific, lived on coconut,breadfruit and fish, which wereavailableyearround.Regardless,obe sity was unknown among them untiltheonsetofindustrializationandthe
  • 136. Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise than click here
  • 137. Westernization of their traditional diet.Even in modern-day North America,widespreadfaminehasbeenunco mmonsince the Great Depression. Yet thegrowth of obesity has happened onlysince the 1970s. In wild animals, morbid obesity israre, even with an abundance of food,exceptwhenitispartofthenormallife cycle,aswithhibernatinganimals. Abundant food leads to a rise in thenumbers of animals, not an enormousincrease intheirsize.Thinkaboutratsorcockroaches. When food is scarce, ratpopulations are low. When food isplentiful, rat populations explode. Therearemanymorenormal- sizedrats,notthesamenumberofmorbidlyo
  • 139. There is no survival advantage tocarryingaveryhighbody- fatpercentage.A male marathon runner may have 5percent to 11 percent bodyfat. Thisamount provides enough energy tosurviveformorethanamonthwithouteatin g.Certainanimalsfattenregularly. For instance, bears routinely gain weightbefore hibernation—and they do sowithout illness. Humans, though, do nothibernate. There is an importantdifference between being fat and beingobese. Obesity is the state of being fat tothe point of having detrimental healthconsequences.Bears,alongwithwh ales,walruses and other fat animals are fat,but not obese, since they suffer no
  • 141. genetically programmed to become fat.We aren’t. In humans, evolution did notfavorobesity,butrather,leanness. The thrifty-gene hypothesis doesn’texplain obesity, but what does? As wewill see in Part 3, “A New Model ofObesity,” the root cause of obesity is acomplex hormonal imbalance with highblood insulinasitscentralfeature.Thehormonal profile of a baby is influencedby the environment in the mother’s bodybefore birth, setting up a tendency forhigh insulin levels and associatedobesity later in life. The explanation ofobesity as a caloric imbalance simplycannot account for this predominantlygenetic effect, since eating and exercisearevoluntarybehaviors.Obesitya
  • 142. s a
  • 143. hormonalimbalancemoreeffectivelye xplainsthisgeneticeffect. But inherited factors account for only70percentofthetendencytoobesitythat we observe. The other 30 percent offactors are under our control, but whatshouldwedotomakethemostofthis? Aredietandexercisetheanswer?
  • 145. (3)
  • 146. THECALORIE- REDUCTIONERRO R TRADITIONALLY,OBESITYHASbeenseen as a result of how people processcalories, that is, that a person’s weightcouldbe predictedbya simpleequation: Calories In–Calories Out=BodyFatThiskeyequationperpetra teswhatI call the calorie deception. It isdangerous preciselybecauseitappearsso simple and intuitive. But what youneedtounderstandisthatmanyfalseass
  • 148. and CaloriesOutareindepende ntofeachother THISASSUMPTIONISacrucialmistake. As we’ll see later on in this chapter,experimentsandexperiencehave proventhisassumptionfalse.Caloricintake andexpenditure are intimately dependentvariables. Decreasing Calories IntriggersadecreaseinCaloriesOut.A30 percent reduction in caloric intakeresults in a 30 percent decrease incaloric expenditure. The end result isminimalweightloss. Assumption2:Basalmet
  • 150. barely a thought for caloric expenditure,except for exercise. Measuring caloricintake is simple, but measuring thebody’stotalenergyexpenditureiscomp licated. Therefore, the simple butcompletely erroneous assumption ismade that energy expenditure remainsconstant except for exercise. Totalenergy expenditure is the sum of basalmetabolic rate, thermogenic effect offood, nonexercise activitythermogenesis, excess post- exerciseoxygen consumption and exercise. Thetotal energy expenditure can go up ordown by as much as 50 percentdepending upon the caloric intake aswellasotherfactors.
  • 151. Assumption 3: We exertconsciouscontrolov erCaloriesIn EATINGISAdeliberateact,soweassume that eating is a conscious decision andthathungerplaysonlyaminorroleinit.B ut numerous overlapping hormonalsystems influence the decision of whento eat and when to stop. We consciouslydecide to eat in response to hungersignals that are largely hormonallymediated. We consciously stop eatingwhen the body sends signals of satiety(fullness) that are largely hormonallymediated. Forexample,thesmelloffryingfoodmake syouhungryatlunchtime.
  • 152. However, if you have just finished alarge buffet, those same smells maymake you slightly queasy. The smells arethe same. The decision to eat or not isprincipallyhormonal. Ourbodiespossessanintricatesystem guiding us to eat or not. Body- fatregulationisunderautomaticcontrol,lik e breathing. We do not consciouslyremind ourselves to breathe, nor do weremindourheartstobeat.Theonlywayto achieve such control is to havehomeostatic mechanisms. Sincehormones control both Calories In andCaloriesOut, obesityisahormonal, notacaloric,disorder. Assumption4:Fatstoresare
  • 153. How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you want to learn this special method than click here
  • 154. essentiallyunregulated EVERY SINGLE SYSTEM in the body isregulated.Growthinheightisregulatedb y growth hormone. Blood sugars areregulated by the hormones insulin andglucagon, among others. Sexualmaturation is regulated by testosteroneand estrogen. Body temperature isregulated by a thyroid- stimulatinghormone and free thyroxine. The list isendless. We are asked to believe, however,that growth of fat cells is essentiallyunregulated.Thesimpleact ofeating,without any interference from anyhormones,willresultinfatgrowth. Extracaloriesaredumpedintofatcellsliked
  • 156. This assumption has already beenprovenfalse.Newhormonalpathway sin the regulation of fat growth are beingdiscovered all the time. Leptin is thebest-known hormone regulating fatgrowth, but adiponectin, hormone- sensitivelipase,lipoproteinlipaseandadi pose triglyceride lipase may all playimportantroles.Ifhormonesregulatef atgrowth,then obesityisahormonal, notacaloricdisorder. Assumption5:Acalorieisacal orie THISASSUMPTION ISthemostdangerous ofall.It’sobviouslytrue.Justlike adogis a dog or a desk is a desk. There aremanydifferentkindsofdogsanddesks,
  • 157. but the simple statement that a dog is adog is true. However, the real issue isthis: Are all calories equally likely tocausefatgain? “A calorie is a calorie” implies thatthe only important variable in weightgainisthetotalcaloricintake,andth us,all foods can be reduced to their caloricenergy. But does a calorie of olive oilcause the same metabolic response as acalorie of sugar? The answer is,obviously, no. These two foods havemanyeasilymeasurabledifferences. Sugar will increase the blood glucoselevel and provoke an insulin responsefrom the pancreas. Olive oil will not.Whenoliveoilisabsorbedbythe smallintestineandtransportedtotheliver,
  • 158. thereisnosignificantincreaseinbloodgluco se or insulin. The two differentfoods evoke vastly different metabolicandhormonalresponses. These five assumptions—the keyassumptions in the caloric reductiontheory of weight loss—have all beenprovedfalse. Allcaloriesarenotequally likely to cause weight gain. Theentirecaloricobsessionwas afifty- yeardeadend. So we must begin again. What causesweightgain?
  • 159. HOWDOWEPROCESSFOOD? WHAT IS Acalorie? A calorie is simply aunit of energy. Different foods areburnedinalaboratory,andtheamountofh eatreleasedismeasuredtodetermineacalor icvalue forthatfood. All the foods we eat contain calories.Foodfirstentersthestomach,wher eitismixed with stomach acid and slowlyreleasedintothesmallintestine. Nutrients are extracted throughout thejourney through the small and largeintestines.Whatremainsisexcretedass tool. Proteins are broken down into theirbuilding blocks, amino acids. These areused to build and repair the body’stissues,andtheexcessisstored.Fatsa re
  • 160. directly absorbed into the body.Carbohydrates are broken down intotheir building blocks, sugars. Proteins,fats and carbohydrates all providecaloricenergyforthebody,butdi ffergreatly in their metabolic processing.This results in different hormonalstimuli.
  • 161. CALORICREDUCTIONISNOTT HE PRIMARY FACTOR INWEIGHTLOSS WHY DO WE gain weight? The mostcommon answer is that excess caloricintakecausesobesity.Butalthoug htheincrease in obesity rates in the UnitedStates from 1971 to 2000 wasassociated with an increase in dailycalorie consumption of roughly 200 to300 calories,1it’s important toremember that correlation is notcausation. Furthermore, the correlation betweenweight gain and the increase in calorieconsumptionhasrecentlybrokendo wn.2Data from the National Health andNutritionExaminationSurvey(NHANES)
  • 162. in the United States from 1990 to 2010finds noassociationbetweenincreasedcalorie consumptionandweightgain. While obesity increased at a rate of 0.37percentperyear,caloricintakeremaine dvirtually stable. Women slightlyincreased their average daily intake from1761calories to 1781, but men slightlydecreased theirs from 2616 calories to2511. The British obesity epidemic largelyran parallel to North America’s. Butonce again, the association of weightgainwithincreased calorieconsumptiondoes not hold true.3In the Britishexperience, neither increased caloricintake nor dietary fat
  • 164. relationship.Infact,thenumberofcalories ingested slightly decreased,evenasobesityratesincreased. Otherfactors, including the nature of thosecalories,hadchanged. Wemayimagineourselvestobeacalo rie-weighingscaleand maythinkthat imbalance of calories over timeleadstotheaccumulationoffat. Calories In–Calories Out=BodyFatIfCaloriesOutremainssta bleover time, then reducing Calories In shouldproduce weight loss. The First Law ofThermodynamicsstatesthatenergycann either be created nor destroyed in anisolated system. This law is ofteninvoked to support the
  • 166. obesity researcher Dr. Jules Hirsch,quotedina2012NewYorkTim esarticle,4explains: Thereisaninflexiblelawofphysics— energy taken in must exactly equal thenumberofcaloriesleavingthesystemwh enfatstorageisunchanged.Caloriesleaveth esystem whenfoodisusedtofuelthebody.Tolowerfa tcontent—reduceobesity— onemustreducecaloriestakenin,orincrease theoutputbyincreasingactivity,orboth.Thi sistruewhethercaloriescomefrompumpkin sorpeanutsorpâtédefoiegras. But thermodynamics, a law ofphysics,hasminimalrelevancetohuman biology for the simple reason that thehumanbodyisnotanisolatedsystem.
  • 167. Energy is constantly entering andleaving. Infact, theveryactwearemostconcerned about— eating—puts energyintothesystem.Foodenergyisalsoe xcreted from the system in the form ofstool. Having studied a full year ofthermodynamics in university, I canassure you that neither calories norweight gain were mentioned even asingle time. If we eat an extra 200 calories today,nothing prevents the body from burningthat excess for heat. Or perhaps thatextra 200caloriesisexcretedasstool.Or perhaps the liver uses the extra 200.We obsess about caloric input into thesystem,butoutputisfarmoreimportant.
  • 168. Whatdeterminestheenergyoutputof How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you want to learn this special method than click here
  • 169. thesystem?Supposeweconsume2000ca lories of chemical energy (food) inone day. What is the metabolic fate ofthose2000calories?Possibilitiesforth eiruse include heatproduction, new protein production,new bone production,new muscle production,cognition (brain),increasedheartra te, increased stroke volume (heart),exercise/physicalexertion ,detoxification (liver),detoxification(kidney),di gestion (pancreas and
  • 171. excretion(intestinesandcolon)andfat production. We certainly don’t mind if energy isburned as heat or used to build newprotein,butwedomindifitisdeposited as fat. There are an almost infinitenumberofwaysthatthebodycandiss ipate excess energy instead ofstoringitasbodyfat. Withthemodelofthecalorie-balancing scale, we assume that fat gainor loss is essentially unregulated, andthat weight gain and loss is underconscious control. But no system in thebody is unregulated like that. Hormonestightlyregulateeverysinglesyst eminthebody.Thethyroid,parathyroid,
  • 172. sympathetic, parasympathetic,respiratory, circulatory, hepatic, renal,gastrointestinalandadrenalsystemsa reall under hormonal control. So is bodyfat. The body actually has multiplesystemstocontrolbodyweight. The problem of fat accumulation isreally a problem of distribution ofenergy. Too much energy is diverted tofat production as opposed to, say,increasing, body-heat production. Thevast majority of this energy expenditureis controlled automatically, withexercise being the only factor that isunder our conscious control. Forexample, we cannot decide how muchenergy to expend on fat accumulationversusnewboneformation.
  • 174. metabolicprocessesarevirtuallyimpossib le to measure, they are assumedto remain relatively stable. In particular,CaloriesOutisassumednottoch angeinresponsetoCaloriesIn.Wepresume thatthetwo areindependentvariables. Let’stakeananalogy.Considerthemoney thatyouearninayear(MoneyIn)and the money that you spend (MoneyOut). Suppose you normally earn andalso spend $100,000 per year. If MoneyInisnowreducedto$25,000 peryear,whatwouldhappentoMoneyOut? Wouldyoucontinuetospend$100,000pery ear? Probablyyou’re notsostupid,asyou’dquicklybecomebank rupt. Instead,youwouldreduceyourMoneyOutto $25,000peryeartobalancethe
  • 175. budget. Money In and Money Out aredependent variables, since reduction ofone willdirectlycause areductionoftheother. Let’sapplythisreasoningtoobesity. Reducing Calories In works only ifCalories Out remains stable. What wefind instead is that a sudden reduction ofCalories IncausesasimilarreductioninCalories Out, and no weight is lost asthebodybalancesitsenergybudget. Some historic experiments in caloriereductionhaveshownexactlyth is.
  • 176. CALORIC REDUCTION:EXTREME EXPERIMENTS,UNEXPECTE D RESULTSEXPERIMENTALLY,IT’SEAS Ytostudy caloric reduction. We take some people,give them less to eat, watch them loseweight and live happily ever after. Bam.Case closed. Call the Nobel committee:Eat Less, Move More is the cure forobesity,andcaloricreductiontrulyisthe bestwaytoloseweight. Luckily for us, such studies havealreadybeendone. A detailed study of total energyexpenditure under conditions of
  • 177. reducedcaloric intake was done in 1919 at theCarnegie Institute of Washington.5Volunteersconsumed“sem i-starvation”
  • 178. diets of 1400 to 2100 calories per day,an amount calculated to beapproximately 30 percent lower thantheirusualintake.(Manycurrentweigh t-loss diets target very similar levels ofcaloric intake.) The question waswhethertotalenergyexpenditure(Calo ries Out) decreases in response tocaloric reduction (Calories In). Whathappened? The participants experienced awhopping 30 percent decrease in totalenergy expenditure, from an initialcaloric expenditure of roughly 3000calories to approximately 1950 calories.Even nearly 100 years ago, it was clearthat Calories Out is highly dependent onCaloriesIn. A30 percentreductionin
  • 179. caloric intake resulted in a nearlyidentical30percentreductionincalor icexpenditure. The energy budget isbalanced. The First Law ofThermodynamicsisnotbroken. Several decades later, in 1944 and1945, Dr. Ancel Keys performed themostcompleteexperimentofstarvatio never done—the Minnesota StarvationExperiment, the details of which werepublished in 1950 in a two- volumepublication entitled The Biology ofHuman Starvation.6In the aftermath ofWorld War II, millions of people wereon the verge of starvation. Yet thephysiologic effects of starvation werevirtually unknown, having never beenscientificallystudied. TheMinnesota
  • 180. study was an attempt to understand boththe caloric-reduction and recoveryphases of starvation. Improvedknowledge would help guide Europe’srecovery from the brink. Indeed, as aresult of this study, a relief-worker’sfield manual was written detailingpsychologicalaspectsofstarvat ion.7 Thirty-sixyoung,healthy,normalmen were selected with an average height offive foot ten inches (1.78 meters) and anaverage weight of 153 pounds (69.3kilograms). For the first three months,subjects received a standard diet of3200caloriesperday.Overthenextsixm onths of semi-starvation, only
  • 181. 1570calories were given to them. However,caloricintake wascontinuallyadjusted
  • 182. to reach a target total weight loss of 24percent (compared to baseline),averaging 2.5pounds(1.1kilograms)perweek.Some meneventuallyreceivedlessthan1000calo riesperday. The foods given were high incarbohydrates,similartothoseavailable in war-torn Europe at the time— potatoes,turnips,breadandmacaroni. Meat and dairy products were rarelygiven.Inaddition,theywalked 22 milesper week as exercise. Following thiscaloric-reduction phase, their calorieswere gradually increased over threemonths of rehabilitation. Expectedcaloricexpenditurewas3009 caloriesperday.8 EvenDr.Keyshimselfwasshocked
  • 183. by the difficulty of the experiment. Themenexperiencedprofoundphysicalan dpsychologicalchanges.Amongthemostc onsistent findings was the constantfeeling of cold experienced by theparticipants. As one explained, “I’mcold. In July I walk downtown on asunny day with a shirt and sweater tokeepmewarm.Atnightmywellfedroom mate, who isn’t in the experiment,sleeps on top of his sheets but I crawlundertwoblankets.”9 Restingmetabolicratedroppedby40 percent. Interestingly, thisphenomenon is very similar to that of theprevious study, which showed a drop of30percent.Measurementofthesubjects’ strengthshoweda21percentdecrease.
  • 184. Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise than click here
  • 185. Heartrateslowed considerably, fromanaverage of fifty-five beats per minute toonly thirty-five. Heart stroke volumedecreased by 20 percent. Bodytemperature dropped to an average of95.8°F.10Physical endurance droppedby half. Blood pressure dropped. Menbecameextremelytiredanddizzy.The ylosthairandtheirnails grewbrittle. Psychologically, there were equallydevastating effects. The menexperienced a complete lack of interestin everything except for food, whichbecame an object of intense fascinationto them. Some hoarded cookbooks andutensils. They were plagued withconstant,unyieldinghunger.Somewe
  • 187. withdrew from their university studies.There were several cases of franklyneuroticbehavior. Let’s reflect on what was happeninghere.Priortothestudy,thesubj ectsateand also burned approximately 3000calories per day. Then, suddenly, theircaloric intake was reduced toapproximately 1500 per day. All bodyfunctions that require energyexperienced an immediate, across-the-board 30 percent to 40 percentreduction, which wrought completehavoc.Consider thefollowing: Caloriesareneededtoheatthebod y.
  • 189. reduced. Result: constant feeling ofcold. Caloriesareneededforthehearttopu mp blood. Fewercalorieswereavailable, so the pump sloweddown. Result: heart rate and strokevolume decreases. Calories are needed to maintainbloodpressure.Fewercalor ieswereavailable,sothebodyturnedt he pressure down. Result: bloodpressuredecreased. Caloriesareneeded forbrainfunction, as the brain is verymetabolically active. Fewercalorieswereavailable,s ocognition was reduced. Result:lethargyandinabilityto
  • 190. concentrate. Calories are needed to move thebody.Fewercalorieswereavail able, so movement wasreduced.Result:weaknessduri ngphysicalactivity. Caloriesareneededto replacehairandnails.Fewercalories wereavailable, so hairandnailswerenot replaced. Result: brittle nailsandhairloss. The body reacts in this way— byreducing energy expenditure— becausethe body is smart and doesn’t want todie. What would happen if the bodycontinuedtoexpend3000caloriesdai lywhiletakinginonly1500?Soonfat
  • 191. stores would be burned, then proteinstores would be burned, and then youwoulddie.Nice.Thesmartcourseofacti on for the body is to immediatelyreduce caloric expenditure to 1500caloriesperdayto restorebalance. Caloric expenditure may even beadjusted a little lower (say, to 1400caloriesperday),tocreateamarginof safety.This isexactlywhatthebodydoes. In other words, the body shuts down.In order to preserve itself, it implementsacross-the-board reductions in energyoutput. The crucial point to remember isthatdoingsoensuressurvivaloftheindivi dualinatimeofextremestress. Yeah,youmightfeellousy,butyou’ll
  • 192. live to tell the tale. Reducing output isthesmartthingforthebodytodo. Burning energy it does not have wouldquickly lead to death. The energy budgetmustbebalanced. CaloriesInandCalories Outarehighlydependentvariables. With reflection, it should immediatelybeobviousthatcaloricexpen dituremustdecrease. If we reduce daily calorieintake by 500 calories, we assume that 1pound (0.45 kilograms) of fat per weekis lost. Does that mean that in 200weeks, we would lose 200 pounds (91kilograms)andweighzeropounds?Ofc oursenot.Thebodymust,atsomepoint, reduce its caloric expenditure tomeetthelowercaloricintake.Itjustso
  • 193. happens that this adaptation occursalmost immediately and persists longterm. The men in the MinnesotaStarvation Experiment should have lost78 pounds (35.3 kilograms), but theactual weight lost was only 37 pounds(16.8kilograms)— lessthanhalfofwhatwas expected. More and more severecaloric restriction was required tocontinuelosingweight.Soundfamiliar? Whathappenedtotheirweightafterthes emi-starvationperiod? During the semi-starvation phase,body fat dropped much quicker thanoverall body weight as fat stores arepreferentially used to power the body.Once the participants started therecoveryperiod,theyregainedthe
  • 194. weight rather quickly, in about twelveweeks. But it didn’t stop there. Bodyweightcontinuedtoincreaseuntilitwa sactually higher than it was prior to theexperiment. The body quickly responds to caloricreduction by reducing metabolism (totalenergy expenditure), but how long doesthis adaptation persist? Given enoughtime, does the body increase its energyexpenditurebacktoitsprevioushigh erlevel if caloric reduction is maintained?The short answer is no.11In a 2008study, participants initially lost 10percent of body weight, and their totalenergy expenditure decreased asexpected.Buthowlongdidthissituationla st?Itremainedreducedover the
  • 195. course of the entire study—a full year.Evenafteroneyearatthenew,lowerbo dyweight,theirtotalenergyexpenditure was still reduced by anaverageofalmost500caloriesper day.In response to caloric reduction,metabolism decreases almostimmediately, and that decrease persistsmoreorless indefinitely. The applicability of these findings tocaloric-reductiondietsisobvious. Assume that prior to dieting, a womaneats and burns 2000 calories per day.Following doctor’s orders, she adopts acalorie-restricted,portion- controlled,low-fat diet, reducing her intake by 500calories per day. Quickly, her totalenergyexpenditure alsodropsby500
  • 196. caloriesperday,ifnotalittlemore.Shefeel s lousy, tired, cold, hungry, irritableand depressed, but sticks with it,thinking that things must eventuallyimprove. Initially, she loses weight, butas her body’s caloric expendituredecreases to match her lowered intake,her weight plateaus. Her dietarycompliance is good, but one year later,things have not improved. Her weightslowly creeps back up, even though sheeats the same number of calories. Tiredof feeling so lousy, she abandons thefailed diet and resumes eating 2000calories per day. Since her metabolismhas slowed to an output of only 1500calories per day, all her weight comesrushingback— asfat.Thosearoundher
  • 197. How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you want to learn this special method than click here
  • 198. silentlyaccuseheroflackingwillpower.Sou nd familiar? But her weight regain isnot her failure. Instead, it’s to beexpected. Everything described here hasbeen well documented over the last 100years!
  • 199. ANERRONEOUSASSUMPTION LET’S CONSIDER Alast analogy here.Supposewemanageacoal- firedpowerplant. Every day to generate energy, wereceive and burn 2000 tons of coal. Wealso keep some coal stored in a shed,justincasewerunlow. Now,allofasudden,wereceiveonly150 0 tons of coal a day. Should wecontinuetoburn2000tonsofcoaldaily? We would quickly burn through ourstores of coal, and then our power plantwould be shut down. Massive blackoutsdevelop over the entire city. Anarchyandlootingcommence.Ourbosste llsushow utterly stupid we are and yells,“YourassisFIRED!”Unfortunatelyfor us,he’sentirelyright.
  • 200. In reality, we’d handle this situationanotherway.Assoonaswerealiz ethatwe’ve received only 1500 tons of coal,we’d immediately reduce our powergeneration to burn only 1500 tons. Infact, we might burn only 1400 tons, justincasetherewerefurtherreductionsin shipments.Inthecity,afewlightsgodim, but there are no widespreadblackouts. Anarchy and looting areavoided. Boss says, “Great job. You’renot as stupid as you look. Raises allaround.”Wemaintaintheloweroutputo f1500tonsaslongasnecessary. Thekeyassumptionofthetheorythatreduc ing caloric intake leads to weightlossisfalse,sincedecreasedcalorici ntakeinevitablyleads todecreased
  • 201. caloric expenditure. This sequence hasbeenproventimeandagain.Wejustkeep hoping that this strategy willsomehow,thistime,work.Itwon’t.Fac eit. In our heart of hearts, we alreadyknow it to be true. Caloric reduction andportion- controlstrategiesonlymakeyoutired and hungry. Worst of all... youregain alltheweightyouhavelost.Iknowit.Youkn owit. We forget this inconvenient factbecauseourdoctors,ourdieticians,ou rgovernment, our scientists, ourpoliticiansandourmediahaveallbeens creamingatusfordecadesthatweightloss is all about Calories In versusCalories Out. “Caloric reduction isprimary.”“EatLess,MoveMore.”We
  • 202. haveheard itso oftenthatwedo notquestionwhetherit’sthetruth. Instead,webelievethatthefaultliesino urselves.We feelwe havefailed. Some silently criticize us for notadhering to the diet. Others silently thinkwe have no willpower and offer usmeaningless platitudes. Soundfamiliar? The failing isn’t ours. The portion- control caloric-reduction diet isvirtually guaranteed to fail. Eating lessdoes notresultinlastingweightloss.
  • 203. EATING IS NOT UNDERCONSCIOUSCONTR OL BY THE EARLY 1990s, the Battle of theBulge was not going well. The obesityepidemicwasgatheringmomentum ,withtype 2 diabetes following closelybehind. The low-fat campaign wasstartingtofizzleasthepromisedbenefits had failed to materialize. Even as wewere choking down our dry skinlesschicken breast and rice cakes, we weregetting fatter and sicker. Looking foranswers, the National Institutes ofHealth recruited almost 50,000 post- menopausalwomenforthemostmassive, expensive, ambitious
  • 205. controlledtrialwascalledtheWomen’sHea lth Initiative Dietary ModificationTrial.12This trial is arguably the mostimportantdietarystudyeverdone. Approximately one-third of thesewomen received a series of eighteeneducation sessions, group activities,targeted message campaigns andpersonalized feedback over one year.Their dietary intervention was to reducedietary fat, which was cut down to 20percent of daily calories. They alsoincreasedtheirvegetableandfruitintak eto five servings per day and grains to sixservings. They were encouraged toincrease exercise.Thecontrolgroupwas instructed to eat as they normallydid.Thoseinthis
  • 207. with a copy of the Dietary Guidelinesfor Americans, but otherwise receivedlittlehelp.Thetrialaimedtoconfir mthecardiovascular health and weight- reductionbenefitsofthe low-fatdiet. Theaverageweightofparticipantsatth e beginning of the study was 169pounds (76.8 kilograms). The startingaverage body mass index was 29.1,putting participants in the overweightcategory (body mass index of 25 to29.9), but bordering on obese (bodymass index greater than 30). They werefollowed for 7.5 years to see if thedoctor- recommended diet reducedobesity, heart disease and cancer asmuchasexpected. Thegroupthatreceiveddietary
  • 208. counseling succeeded. Daily caloriesdropped from 1788 to 1446 a day—areduction of 342 calories per day foroversevenyears.Fatas apercentageofcaloriesdecreasedfrom38. 8percentto 29.8 percent, and carbohydratesincreased from 44.5 percent to 52.7percent. The women increased theirdaily physical activity by 14 percent.The control group continued to eat thesamehigher-calorieandhigher- fatdiettowhichtheywere accustomed. The results were telling. The “EatLess, Move More” group started outterrifically, averaging more than 4pounds (1.8 kilograms) of weight lossoverthefirstyear.Bythesecondyear,th eweightstartedtoberegained,andby
  • 209. the end of the study, there was nosignificant difference between the twogroups. Did these women perhaps replacesome oftheirfatwithmuscle? Unfortunately, the average waistcircumferenceincreasedapproximate ly 0.39 inches (0.6 centimeters), and theaverage waist-to-hip ratio increasedfrom 0.82 to 0.83 inches (2.1centimeters), which indicates thesewomen were actually fatter than before.Weightlossover7.5yearsofthe EatLess,MoveMorestrategywasnoteven onesinglekilogram(2.2pounds). This study was only the latest in anunbroken string of failed experiments.Caloricreductionastheprimar
  • 210. ymeans
  • 211. of weight loss has disappointedrepeatedly. Reviews of the literature bythe U.S. Department of Agriculture13highlight this failure. All these studies,ofcourse, serveonlyto confirmwhatwealready knew. Caloric reduction doesn’tcause lasting weight loss. Anybody whohasevertrieditcantellyou. Manypeopletellme,“Idon’t understand. I eat less. I exercise more.But I can’t seem to lose any weight.” Iunderstand perfectly— because thisadvice has been proven to fail. Docaloric-reduction diets work? No. TheWomen’sHealthInitiativeDietaryMo dification Trial was the biggest,baddest, most kick-ass study of
  • 212. the EatLess,MoveMorestrategythathaseven Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise than click here
  • 213. beenoreverwillbedone— anditwasaresoundingrepudiationofthatstra tegy. What is happening when we try toreduce calories and fail to lose weight?Part of the problem is the reducedmetabolism that accompanies weightloss.Butthat’sonlythebeginning.
  • 214. HUNGERGAMES THECALORIESIN,CaloriesOutplanforweig ht loss assumes that we haveconsciouscontroloverwhatweeat.B utthis belief ignores the extremelypowerful effect of the body’s hormonalstate. The defining characteristic of thehuman body is homeostasis, oradaptation to change. Our body dealswith an ever-changing environment. Inresponse,thebodymakesadjustmentsto minimizetheeffectsofsuchchangesandretu rn to its original condition. And so itis,whenthe bodystartstolose weight. There are two major adaptations tocaloric reduction. The first change, aswe have seen, is a dramatic reduction intotalenergyexpenditure.Thesecondkey
  • 215. change is that the hormonal signals thatstimulate hunger increase. The body ispleadingwithus toeatinorderforittoregainthe lostweight. This effect was demonstrated in 2011,in an elegant study of hormonaladaptation to weight loss.14Subjectswere given a diet of 500 calories perday, which produced an average weightlossof29.7pounds(13.5kilograms ). Next, they were prescribed a low- glycemic-index,low- fatdietforweightmaintenance and were encouraged toexercisethirtyminutesperday.Despitet
  • 216. heir best intentions, almost half of theweightwasregained. Varioushormonallevels,includingg hrelin—ahormonethat,essentially,
  • 217. makes us hungry—were analyzed.Weight loss significantly increasedghrelin levels in the study’s subjects,even after more than one year, comparedtothesubjects’usualbaseline. Whatdoesthatmean?Itmeansthatthesubj ects felt hungrier and continued tofeelso,rightuptoendofthestudy. The study also measured severalsatiety hormones, including peptide YY,amylin and cholecystokinin, all of whichare released in response to proteins andfatsinourdietandservetomakeusfeelful l.Thisresponse,inturn,producesthedesired effect of keeping us fromovereating.Morethanayearafterinitia lweightloss,thelevelsofallthreesatietyhor monesweresignificantlylowerthan
  • 218. before. Whatdoesthatmean?Itmeansthatthesubj ectsfeltlessfull. Withincreasedhungeranddecreasedsati ety,thedesiretoeatrises.Moreover,these hormonal changes occur almostimmediately and persist almostindefinitely. People on a diet tend to feelhungrier, and that effect isn’t some kindof psychological voodoo, nor is it a lossof willpower. Increased hunger is anormal and expected hormonal responsetoweightloss. Dr. Keys’s Minnesota StarvationExperimentfirstdocumentedth eeffectof “semi-starvation neurosis.” Peoplewholoseweightdreamaboutfood. Theyobsessaboutfood.Alltheycanthink
  • 219. about is food. Interest in all elsediminishes. This behavior is not somestrange affliction of the obese. In fact,it’s entirely hormonally driven andnormal.Thebody,throughhungerands atiety signaling, is compelling us to getmore food. Losing weight triggers two importantresponses. First, totalenergyexpenditure is immediately andindefinitely reduced in order to conservethe available energy. Second, hormonalhunger signaling is immediately andindefinitely amplified in an effort toacquiremorefood.Weightlossresultsini ncreased hunger and decreasedmetabolism. This evolutionary survivalstrategyhasasinglepurpose:to
  • 220. makeus
  • 221. regainthelostweight. Functional magnetic resonanceimagingstudiesshowthatareasoft hebraincontrollingemotionandcognitionli ghtup inresponseto food stimuli. Areas of the prefrontal cortex involvedwith restraint show decreased activity.In other words, it is harder for peoplewho have lost weight to resist food.15Thishasnothingwhatsoevertodo with a lack of willpower or any kind ofmoral failure. It’s a normal hormonalfact of life. We feel hungry, cold, tiredanddepressed. Theseareallreal,measurable physical effects of calorierestriction. Reduced metabolism and theincreased hunger are not the cause ofobesity— theyaretheresult.Losing
  • 222. weight causes the reduced metabolismand increased hunger, not the other wayaround.Wedonotsimplymakeaperson al choice to eat more. One of thegreat pillars of the caloric-reductiontheory of obesity—that we eat too muchbecause we choose to—is simply nottrue.Wedonoteattoomuchbecausewec hoose to, or because food is toodelicious, or because of salt, sugar andfat.Weeattoomuchbecauseourownbra incompelsusto.
  • 223. THEVICIOUSCYCLEOFUNDER- EATING ANDSOWEhavetheviciouscycleofunder- eating. We start by eating less andlose some weight. As a result, ourmetabolism slows and hunger increases.Westarttoregainweight.Wedou bleourefforts by eating even less. A bit moreweight comes off, but again, total energyexpenditure decreases and hungerincreases. We start regaining weight. Sowe redouble our efforts by eating evenless. This cycle continues until it isintolerable. We are cold, tired, hungryand obsessing about calories. Worst ofall,theweightalwayscomesbackon. At some point, we go back to our
  • 225. slowed so much, even resuming the oldwayofeatingcausesquickweightgain, up to and even a little past the originalpoint. We are doing exactly what ourhormonesareinfluencingustodo.Butfri ends, family and medicalprofessionals silently blame the victim,thinkingthatitis“ourfault.”Andwe ourselvesfeelthatweare afailure. Soundfamiliar? All dieters share this same sad storyof weight loss and regain. It’s a virtualguarantee. The cycle has beenscientifically established, and its truthhas been forged in the tears of millionsof dieters. Yet nutritional authoritiescontinue to preach that caloric
  • 228. THE CRUELHOAX CALORICREDUCTIONISaharshandbitterdisa ppointment. Yet all the “experts”still agree that caloric reduction is thekey to lasting weight loss. When youdon’tloseweight,theysay,“It’syourfau lt. You were gluttons. You weresloths. You didn’t try hard enough. Youdidn’t want it badly enough.” There’s adirty little secret that nobody is willingto admit: The low-fat, low-calorie diethas already been proven to fail. This isthecruelhoax.Eatinglessdoesnotresulti nlastingweightloss.It.Just. Does.Not.Work. It is cruel because so many of us havebelieved it. It is cruel because all of our“trusted healthsources”tellusitistrue.
  • 229. How Jones loss his weight without any exercise you want to learn this special method than click here
  • 230. It is cruel because when it fails, weblame ourselves. Let me state it asplainlyasIcan:“EatLess” doesnotwork.That’safact.Acceptit. Pharmaceutical methods of caloricreduction only emphasize the spectacularfailure of this paradigm. Orlistat(marketed in the U.S. as Alli) wasdesigned to block the absorption ofdietary fat. Orlistat is the drugequivalent of the low-fat, low- caloriediet. Amongitsnumeroussideeffects,themo st bothersome was euphemisticallycalled fecal leakage and oily spotting.The unabsorbed dietary fat came out theother end, where it often stainedunderwear.Weight-
  • 232. in with useful advice about the “orangepoopoil.” Neverwearwhite pants. Never assume it’s just a fart. In 2007,Alli won the “Bitter Pill Award” forworst drug from the U.S. consumergroup Prescription Access Litigation.Thereweremoreseriousconce rnssuchas liver toxicity, vitamin deficiency andgallstones. However, orlistat’sinsurmountable problem was that it didnotreallywork.16 In a randomized, double- blindcontrolled study,17four years of takingthe medication three times daily resultedin an extra 6 pounds (2.8 kilograms) ofweight loss. But 91 percent of thepatients complained of
  • 234. of the drug peaked in 2001 at $600million. Despite being sold over thecounter,by2013,saleshadplummetedt o$100million. The fake fat olestra was a similarlyill-conceived notion, born out ofcaloric-reduction theory. Released togreat fanfare several years ago, olestrawas not absorbed by the body and thushad no caloric impact. Its sales began tosink within two years of release.18Theproblem? It led to no significant weightloss. By 2010, it landed on Timemagazine’s list of the fifty worstinventions,justbehindasbestos.19
  • 235. (4)
  • 236. THEEXERCISE MYTH DR. PETER ATTIAisthe cofounder ofNutrition Science Initiative (NuSi), anorganization dedicated to improving thequality of science in nutrition andobesity research. A few years ago, hewas an elite long-distance swimmer, oneof only a dozen or so people to haveswum from Los Angeles to CatalinaIsland. A physician himself, he followedthe standard prescribed diet high incarbohydrates and trained religiously forthree to four hours daily. He was also,by his own estimation, about fortypounds (18 kilograms) overweight
  • 238. bodyfat. Butisn’tincreasingexercisethekeytow eightloss? Caloricimbalance— increasedcaloricintake combined with decreased caloricexpenditure—is considered the recipefor obesity. Up until now, we’veassumed that exercise was vitallyimportant to weight loss— that byincreasing exercise, we can burn off theexcesscaloriesthatweeat.
  • 239. THE LIMITS OF EXERCISE: AHARSHREALITY CERTAINLY, EXERCISE HAS great healthbenefits. The early Greek physicianHippocrates, considered the father ofmedicine, said, “If we could give everyindividual the right amount ofnourishment and exercise, not too littleand not too much, we would have foundthe safest way to health.” In the 1950s,along with increasing concern aboutheartdisease,interestinphysicalacti vity and exercise began to grow. In1955, President Eisenhower establishedthePresident’sCouncilonYout hFitness.By 1966, the U.S. Public Health Servicebegan to advocate that increasingphysicalactivitywasoneoftheb
  • 240. est
  • 241. ways to lose weight. Aerobics studiosbegan to sprout like mushrooms after arainstorm. The CompleteBook ofRunningbyJimFixxbecamearunawayb estsellerin1977. The fact that he died at age fifty-two of a massive heart attack was only aminorsetbacktothecause.Dr.KennethCo oper’s book The New Aerobics wasrequired reading in the 1980s where Iwent to high school. More and morepeople began incorporating physicalactivityintotheirleisuretime. It seemed reasonable to expectobesity rates to fall as exercise ratesincreased.Afterall,governmentsaro undthe world have poured millions ofdollarsintopromotingexercisefor
  • 242. weight loss, and they succeeded ingettingtheircitizensmoving.IntheU nitedKingdomfrom1997to2008,regu lar exercise increased from 32percent to 39 percent in men and 21percentto29percentinwomen.1 There’s a problem, though. All thisactivity had no effect on obesity at all.Obesityincreasedrelentlessly,evenas we sweated to the oldies. Just take alookatFigure 4.1,2.
  • 243. Figure4.1. Theincreasingworldwideprevalenceof obesity. The phenomenon is global. A recenteight-country survey revealed thatAmericans exercised the most— 135days per year compared to a globalaverage of 112 days. The Dutch
  • 245. main motivation for exercise in allcountries. Did all this activity translateintolowerratesofobesity? Glad you asked. The Dutch andItalians, with their low exercise rates,experienced less than one-third theobesity of those iron- pumpingAmericans. The problem was apparent in theAmerican NHANESdata as well. From2001 to 2011, there was a generalincrease in physical activity.4Certainareas (Kentucky, Virginia, Florida andthe Carolinas) increased exercise atHerculean rates. But here’s the dismaltruth:whetherphysicalactivityinc reasesordecreases,ithasvirtuallynorelat ionshiptotheprevalenceof
  • 246. obesity. Increasing exercise did notreduceobesity.Itwasirrelevant.Certain states exercised more. Other statesexercised less. Obesity increased by thesameamountregardless. Is exercise important in reducingchildhood obesity? The short answer isno.A2013paper5comparedthephysical activity (measured usingaccelerometry) of children aged three tofive years to their weight. The authorsconcludedthereisno associationbetween activityand obesity. Whatwentwrong? Inherent to the Calories In, CaloriesOut theory is the idea that reducedphysicalactivityplaysa keyrole
  • 247. intheobesityepidemic.This ideais thatwe Do you want to loss your weight without any exercise than click here
  • 248. used to walk everywhere, but now wedrive. With the increase in laborsavingdevices such as cars, our exercise hasdecreased, leading to obesity. Theproliferation of video games, televisionand computers is also believed tocontributetoasedentarylifestyle.Likean ygooddeception,thisonesoundspretty reasonable at first. There is asmall problem,though.Itisjustnottrue. Researcher Dr. Herman Pontzerstudied a hunter-gatherer society living aprimitivelifestyleinthemodernday. TheHadzainTanzaniaoftentravel15to20mil esperdaytogatherfood.Youmight assume that their daily energyexpenditureismuchhigherthanatypic
  • 250. surprising results in a New York Timesarticle: “We found that despite all thisphysical activity, the number of caloriesthat the Hadza burned per day wasindistinguishable from that of typicaladultsinEuropeandtheUnitedStates. ”6 Even if we compare relatively recentactivity rates to those of the 1980s,before the obesity epidemic came intofull swing, rates have not decreasedappreciably.7In a Northern Europeanpopulation, physical-activity energyexpenditure was calculated from the1980s to the mid 2000s. The surprisingfinding was that if anything, physicalactivity has actually increased since
  • 252. predicted energy expenditure for a wildmammal, which is predominantlydetermined by body mass and ambienttemperature. Compared to its wild- mammalcousinssuchastheseeminglyvigo rous cougar, fox and caribou, Homoobesus2015 isnotlessphysicallyactive. Exercise has not decreased sincehunter- gatherertimes,orevensincethe1980s,whil eobesityhasgallopedaheadfullsteam.Itish ighlyimprobablethatdecreased exercise played any role incausingobesityinthefirstplace. Iflackofexercisewasnotthe causeof obesity epidemic, exercise
  • 254. CALORIESOUT THE AMOUNT OFcalories used in a day(Calories Out)is moreaccuratelytermedtotalenergyexpen diture.Totalenergy expenditure is the sum of basalmetabolic rate (defined below),thermogeniceffectoffood,non- exerciseactivity thermogenesis, excess post-exercise oxygen consumption and, ofcourse,exercise. Totalenergyexpenditure=Basalmetaboli crate+Thermogeniceffectoffood + Nonexercise activitythermogenesis + Excess post- exerciseoxygenconsumption+ Exercise. The key point here is that total energyexpenditure is not the same as exercise.Theoverwhelmingmajorityoftot al
  • 255. energyexpenditureisnotexercisebutthe basal metabolic rate: metabolichousekeeping tasks such as breathing,maintaining body temperature, keepingtheheartpumping,maintainingthe vitalorgans,brainfunction,liverfunction,k idneyfunction,etc. Let’stakeanexample.Basalmetabolic rate for a lightly activeaverage male is roughly 2500 caloriesperday.Walkingatamoderatepac e(2miles per hour) for forty-five minutesevery day, would burn roughly 104calories.Inotherwords,thatwillnotev enconsume5 percentofthetotalenergy expenditure. The vast majority(95 percent) of calories are used forbasalmetabolism.
  • 256. Basalmetabolicratedependsonmanyfact ors,including genetics, gender(basalmetabolicrateisge nerallyhigherinmen), age(basalmetabolicrategenerallydr opswithage), weight (basal metabolic rategenerallyincreaseswithmusclem ass), height (basal metabolic rategenerally increases with height),diet (overfeeding or underfeeding),bodytemperature, externaltemperature(heatingorco olingthebody)and organfunction.
  • 257. Nonexercise activity thermogenesis isthe energy used in activity other thansleeping, eating or exercise; for instance,inwalking,gardening,cooking,cl eaningand shopping. The thermogenic effect offood is the energy used in digestion andabsorptionoffoodenergy.Certainfood s, such as dietary fat, are easilyabsorbed and take very little energy tometabolize. Proteins are harder toprocessandusemoreenergy. Thermogenic effect of food variesaccordingtomealsize,mealfrequen cyand macronutrient composition. Excesspost-exercise oxygen consumption (alsocalled after-burn) is the energy used incellular repair, replenishment of