The document summarizes a community event held in Birkenhead, UK to discuss the future of the town. Participants engaged in interactive activities like mapping local assets, writing what the future could look like, and discussing challenges and opportunities in small groups. A panel discussion then addressed questions from the audience. Key themes from the event included the need to include more community voices, concerns about gentrification, and the potential of projects like improving parks and transportation to drive regeneration in an equitable way.
Activities around digging have again become very popular recently, including in the attention they have received from cultural institutions. Many cultural institutions have in recent years recreated wartime (allotment) gardens to highlight a range of different issues and values. Such exhibitions and events, organized during a time of renewed austerity measures, increased concerns around food and the environment, draw obvious parallels to the contemporary moment, offering possibilities to rethink our own values. This panel brings together exciting new research that focuses on this renewed interest in growing your own food.
The first half of the panel highlights work from the recently completed ‘Everyday Growing Cultures’ project, which focused on the potentially transformative value of connecting two currently disparate communities: allotments growers and the open data community. Based on comparative research in Manchester and Sheffield, it explores potential effects of digital engagement and open data for allotment holders to build stronger, more active communities, benefit local economies and improve environmental sustainability and food security. The second half of the panel seeks to understand the different ways in which issues around digging have reemerged in recent years, to understand these by looking at how they have been expressed and mobilized by different people and actors. This can be expressed as actual digging linked to food production, symbolic digging as performance, digging up local histories, or as new forms of gift-giving.
Panel presentations from: Farida Vis, Ian Humphrey, Yana Manyukhina and Penny Rivlin. Penny's slides will be uploaded separately.
1) Over 30 neighbors and 5 children attended a meeting to provide input on a proposed road mural project in their community. Attendees shared their views on community values and what should be reflected in the mural design.
2) Feedback was gathered through discussion at four stations focused on community themes, mural motifs, design ideas, and other neighborhood initiatives. Common themes included the community's history, friendly and family-oriented nature. Design ideas referenced nature and a circular pattern.
3) Additional ideas were proposed to strengthen community connections through shared social activities like street parties and play-based programs like road hockey. Feedback from the productive meeting will help guide the mural design and future
The document summarizes a conference called "Sustainable Places = Sustainable Communities" that explored engaging communities in town regeneration. The conference had over 60 delegates from across the UK, and included presentations from local councils and community organizations on successful engagement programs. Workshop sessions addressed creative engagement, unlocking local talents, investing in public spaces, and sustainable futures. Feedback indicated delegates found the speakers inspiring and gained knowledge on involving communities. The conference aimed to create a new "wheel for sustainable places" to continue the discussion.
WalkUP Roslindale is a community group founded last April that aims to make Roslindale, MA the most walkable neighborhood in Boston. The group has over 270 Facebook friends and 170 Twitter followers. Their mission is to promote walkability in collaboration with neighbors. Some achievements include engaging developers to support walkability projects, conducting a visioning session and survey for a proposed walking path connecting to the Arnold Arboretum, hosting a film series about urban policies, and performing a walk audit of Roslindale Square to identify priorities to address with city officials. Challenges include gaining support from agencies and overcoming concerns about reducing parking for walking/biking.
Presentation to the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) North America Conference in Winnipeg on the design assistance progress, it's adapted models, and how it applies to a variety of community settings.
Parks as Multi-Use Destinations and Catalysts for Community DevelopmentPark Pride
Presentation from Park Pride's 2015 Parks and Greenspace Conference. The presenter is Cynthia Nikitin.
With the importance of parks growing in the public's consciousness, now is the time to question what distinguishes great parks. Project for Public Spaces has identified nine strategies that help parks achieve their full potential to become active, multi-use, accessible, inclusive, safe public spaces that enhance neighborhoods and catalyze local economic development, highlight community authenticity and support multiple users.
Our Spring 2014 edition featuring articles on why rezoning is not required for the proposed development at 955 Hillside Ave, the United Way community survey and Youth in Action update, the neighbourhood remembers Doug Hudlin and more.
Activities around digging have again become very popular recently, including in the attention they have received from cultural institutions. Many cultural institutions have in recent years recreated wartime (allotment) gardens to highlight a range of different issues and values. Such exhibitions and events, organized during a time of renewed austerity measures, increased concerns around food and the environment, draw obvious parallels to the contemporary moment, offering possibilities to rethink our own values. This panel brings together exciting new research that focuses on this renewed interest in growing your own food.
The first half of the panel highlights work from the recently completed ‘Everyday Growing Cultures’ project, which focused on the potentially transformative value of connecting two currently disparate communities: allotments growers and the open data community. Based on comparative research in Manchester and Sheffield, it explores potential effects of digital engagement and open data for allotment holders to build stronger, more active communities, benefit local economies and improve environmental sustainability and food security. The second half of the panel seeks to understand the different ways in which issues around digging have reemerged in recent years, to understand these by looking at how they have been expressed and mobilized by different people and actors. This can be expressed as actual digging linked to food production, symbolic digging as performance, digging up local histories, or as new forms of gift-giving.
Panel presentations from: Farida Vis, Ian Humphrey, Yana Manyukhina and Penny Rivlin. Penny's slides will be uploaded separately.
1) Over 30 neighbors and 5 children attended a meeting to provide input on a proposed road mural project in their community. Attendees shared their views on community values and what should be reflected in the mural design.
2) Feedback was gathered through discussion at four stations focused on community themes, mural motifs, design ideas, and other neighborhood initiatives. Common themes included the community's history, friendly and family-oriented nature. Design ideas referenced nature and a circular pattern.
3) Additional ideas were proposed to strengthen community connections through shared social activities like street parties and play-based programs like road hockey. Feedback from the productive meeting will help guide the mural design and future
The document summarizes a conference called "Sustainable Places = Sustainable Communities" that explored engaging communities in town regeneration. The conference had over 60 delegates from across the UK, and included presentations from local councils and community organizations on successful engagement programs. Workshop sessions addressed creative engagement, unlocking local talents, investing in public spaces, and sustainable futures. Feedback indicated delegates found the speakers inspiring and gained knowledge on involving communities. The conference aimed to create a new "wheel for sustainable places" to continue the discussion.
WalkUP Roslindale is a community group founded last April that aims to make Roslindale, MA the most walkable neighborhood in Boston. The group has over 270 Facebook friends and 170 Twitter followers. Their mission is to promote walkability in collaboration with neighbors. Some achievements include engaging developers to support walkability projects, conducting a visioning session and survey for a proposed walking path connecting to the Arnold Arboretum, hosting a film series about urban policies, and performing a walk audit of Roslindale Square to identify priorities to address with city officials. Challenges include gaining support from agencies and overcoming concerns about reducing parking for walking/biking.
Presentation to the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) North America Conference in Winnipeg on the design assistance progress, it's adapted models, and how it applies to a variety of community settings.
Parks as Multi-Use Destinations and Catalysts for Community DevelopmentPark Pride
Presentation from Park Pride's 2015 Parks and Greenspace Conference. The presenter is Cynthia Nikitin.
With the importance of parks growing in the public's consciousness, now is the time to question what distinguishes great parks. Project for Public Spaces has identified nine strategies that help parks achieve their full potential to become active, multi-use, accessible, inclusive, safe public spaces that enhance neighborhoods and catalyze local economic development, highlight community authenticity and support multiple users.
Our Spring 2014 edition featuring articles on why rezoning is not required for the proposed development at 955 Hillside Ave, the United Way community survey and Youth in Action update, the neighbourhood remembers Doug Hudlin and more.
The document discusses revitalization plans for The Rockaways in Queens, New York after Hurricane Sandy. It proposes focusing development around Beach 116th Street, including a potential ferry terminal there. Other recommendations include improving multi-modal transportation connectivity in the area, creating a tax increment financing district, and transforming key sites like a parking lot into mixed-use developments. The overall goal is to strengthen the community and local economy through new infrastructure, housing and businesses while maintaining affordable options for current residents.
Here's the story of the Cutting Room Experiment, which ran in Manchester on Saturday 20th June 2009. The idea was to get as many people as possible to suggest an idea for one of 12 flashmobs, with the winning one in each stream being put into production by a professional events company. Here's the story of how the event was conceived, and how it went.
What is heritage, and why is it importantangelgate
This webinar covers heritage and how communities can get involved in heritage projects. It discusses what heritage is, examples of heritage, and why heritage is an important community asset. It provides guidance on planning heritage projects, steps to avoid failure, asset transfers, and increasing community involvement. A case study on a community heritage project is presented, along with resources and further reading.
The Next Big Thing Urbanism Workshop was an initiative to take previous design and community development efforts of Glass House Collective to the next level.
During a two-day intensive design workshop, over 100 workshop participants proposed ways to improve Glass Street while maintaining a realistic attitude about both big and small moves that, collectively, could begin to enhance the prospects for the neighborhood and its citizens.
Teams were asked to consider how improved urbanism could have a positive impact on various aspects of the neighborhood, including business viability, quality public spaces, access to services, improved housing options, increased public safety, and opportunities for the community to engage and contribute.
Designs needed to leverage the variety of assets that already exist in the community including physical places, existing businesses, individuals, organizations, previous accomplishments, and sections of the built environment.
What resulted were dozens of creative, realistic, and scalable urban revitalization tactics for improving residential, commercial, and public space within a 5 minute walk radius surrounding historic Glass Street, each contributing to the revitalization effort already underway. Designs specifically addressed implementation within 1 month, 1 year, 3 year time frames, prioritizing lighter, quicker, and cheaper techniques.
While not all the proposals generated will be implemented as designed, they will be the basis of successive small neighborhood workshops to explore specific concepts, projects, and implementation tactics reflecting the residential, commercial, and public space needs of the Glass Street community. Glass House Collective will work with the neighborhood to adapt designs, ultimately using a bunch of little things to create the next big thing on the street.
Using the lenses that Glass House Collective sees their work through, the Outcomes of The Next Big Thing Urbanism Workshop have been organized into three categories:
• Here Because We Love It Here, proposals focused on Creative Placemaking
• Bringing Life Back to Glass Street, proposals focused on Feet on the Streets
• The Next Big Thing, proposals focused on New Partnerships
Not all proposals developed during the workshop are included in this document; however, those that most closely meet the mission of Glass House Collective have been compiled and described in the pages that follow. The appendix lists all project proposals from each team.
From Green Roots to Green Shoots - How did Bristol develop its sustainability...NetImpactBristol
This document summarizes the development of Bristol's sustainability movement from the 1970s to present day. It describes how citizen groups came together in the 1970s to oppose an outer circuit road project, leading to the founding of organizations like Bristol Friends of the Earth and Cyclebag (now Sustrans). These groups pioneered recycling, energy efficiency, and active transportation initiatives. The document also notes the importance of cross-sector collaboration and how youth programs and local government support helped sustainability organizations gain traction in Bristol. It concludes by reflecting on how Bristol became the UK's first Transition City and a 2015 European Green Capital.
Teeny Tiny Summit -Creatively Bringing Community Together - Sept 23Carolyn Puterbough
This document summarizes a virtual webinar about economic development in small, rural communities called the Teeny Tiny Summit. The webinar included presentations on transforming rural economies, creative collaboration projects in Fenelon Falls and Kawartha Lakes, the reimagined 2020 virtual Bayfield Agricultural Fair, and snapshots of other communities creatively bringing people together virtually. The agenda outlined three 90-minute webinar sessions to share examples, tools, and success stories for supporting small, rural places during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This document is a newsletter from the Hillside-Quadra Community in Victoria, BC. It provides information on local community events, projects, and issues. Articles discuss the Shared Assessment Committee receiving an award for its work helping families, reflections on the recent teachers' strike, and a youth group called Angels on Wheels that refurbishes and donates bicycles in the community. Advertisements seek letters to the editor, and promote advertising in the newsletter to local businesses.
Funding surgery - Heritage Lottery Fund Alison Clyde
This document provides information about the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) in Scotland. It summarizes that the HLF has funded over 2,500 community projects since 1994 using money from the National Lottery. It describes the different types of heritage and projects that HLF supports, including built, natural, and cultural heritage. It outlines several of HLF's grant programs and provides an example of a successful intergenerational oral history project. It concludes by offering tips for strong applications and highlighting common pitfalls to avoid.
The public relations plan proposes tactics to increase awareness, interest, and attendance of the Governor Henry Lippitt House Museum in Providence, Rhode Island. The plan targets college students and families with young children living in College Hill. Tactics include expanding social media presence on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, distributing press releases and PSAs to local media, creating shared digital content, producing printed materials, emphasizing the museum's brand identity, and holding fundraising events. The goal is to share knowledge of the museum as a cultural gem and community staple.
The document discusses strategies for strengthening a nonprofit organization's brand and digital presence. It emphasizes developing a clear brand personality focused on trust, and using digital tools like websites, social media, multimedia, and crowd funding to raise awareness and engage supporters. The goal is to build widespread appeal by communicating the organization's impact in a simple and consistent way that resonates with the public.
This document discusses strategies for strengthening an organization's brand and digital presence. It emphasizes developing a clear brand identity focused on trust and positive feelings. It also stresses the importance of using simple, consistent language and imagery that appeals to the general public. The document provides examples of successful digital fundraising campaigns and recommends developing multimedia content, social media engagement, and encouraging user-generated content to build the brand.
After conducting the historical research and talking to the residents, it was evident that gentrification has enriched and nourished the Long Island City area. It has gone through a great deal of transformation and improved for the better. All the cultural influence and the gorgeous restaurants along with the waterfront view of the Manhattan skyline contribute to the holistic vibe of the area.
Our Summer 2015 edition with our cover story, Topaz Park Response Shows Depth of Concern for Neighbourhood, Homeless and Parks and articles on QVCC youth programs on the rise, meet Catherine Chapman - Photographer and Jennifer Ferris - Storyteller, our featured creative neighbours and volunteer spotlight: Kathy & Blair.
This document discusses strategies for building an organization's brand and digital presence. It emphasizes that a brand is defined by how people feel about and talk about an organization, and is ultimately based on trust. It provides examples of inspirational statistics about other non-profits to demonstrate widespread public appeal. The document also outlines recommendations for developing a brand identity through a logo, color palette, photography and other visual elements. It suggests using digital tools like websites, social media, multimedia content and crowd funding to engage the public and raise funds.
Future of London 2018 Conference (afternoon breakouts side room)futureoflondon
This document summarizes a conference on overcoming barriers in London held on June 21, 2018. It includes the agenda, speaker bios, and presentations on various topics related to mobility, placemaking, and community engagement. Speakers discussed research on how the design of neighborhoods can impact health and activity as people age, as well as case studies of placemaking projects in Thamesmead and strategies for making coworking spaces more accessible. The document also summarizes breakout group discussions on barriers faced by residents and community organizations and potential community-driven solutions.
Presentation to Regionalmedien Austria (RMA) an Austrian media company. RMA distributes free (advertiser-funded) newspapers throughout Austria that include local, regional and national content, reaching almost 50% market saturation. (Wikipedia)
The document summarizes the results of a community consultation process regarding the redevelopment of the Allandale Station lands in Barrie, Ontario. Over 500 community members provided input through open houses and interviews. Six key themes emerged that should guide the redevelopment: connecting to Allandale's history and identity, the community, the environment, surrounding areas, technology, and culture/creative economy. Recommendations included restoring the train station, developing the area around it as a public space, and ensuring the redevelopment enhances Allandale's identity while attracting creative/knowledge workers.
Don Dixon created the Canadian Icons Project to photograph and interview 150 iconic Canadians to celebrate Canada's diversity and achievements, and launched the Canadian Change Conversations platform to engage these icons and Canadians in discussions about issues shaping society. The project involves a book, traveling photo exhibition, video interviews, crowdsourcing challenges, and events to encourage conversations around citizenship and positive social change.
Writing effective award nominations March 2011ABScotland
The document provides guidance for nominating partnerships for arts and business awards. It emphasizes reading the nomination guidelines closely, involving both partner organizations, and addressing what the judges are looking for through clear, compelling, convincing and concise writing. The four 'C's of an effective nomination are identified as being clear, compelling, convincing and concise. Examples of effective and edited nominations are provided.
The document discusses a community engagement event called "Walk & Talk & Nuts & Bolts" that was facilitated by the author in Redmond, Washington to involve the local community in planning for the city's historic downtown core. The author created an "Urban Diary" workbook to guide participants through the historic area and collect feedback on aspects of the built environment through open-ended questions. Twenty-six community members participated in the walking meeting and provided input. The results of the project include the successful community event and a case study report analyzing the collected feedback to inform the city's further engagement efforts.
The document discusses revitalization plans for The Rockaways in Queens, New York after Hurricane Sandy. It proposes focusing development around Beach 116th Street, including a potential ferry terminal there. Other recommendations include improving multi-modal transportation connectivity in the area, creating a tax increment financing district, and transforming key sites like a parking lot into mixed-use developments. The overall goal is to strengthen the community and local economy through new infrastructure, housing and businesses while maintaining affordable options for current residents.
Here's the story of the Cutting Room Experiment, which ran in Manchester on Saturday 20th June 2009. The idea was to get as many people as possible to suggest an idea for one of 12 flashmobs, with the winning one in each stream being put into production by a professional events company. Here's the story of how the event was conceived, and how it went.
What is heritage, and why is it importantangelgate
This webinar covers heritage and how communities can get involved in heritage projects. It discusses what heritage is, examples of heritage, and why heritage is an important community asset. It provides guidance on planning heritage projects, steps to avoid failure, asset transfers, and increasing community involvement. A case study on a community heritage project is presented, along with resources and further reading.
The Next Big Thing Urbanism Workshop was an initiative to take previous design and community development efforts of Glass House Collective to the next level.
During a two-day intensive design workshop, over 100 workshop participants proposed ways to improve Glass Street while maintaining a realistic attitude about both big and small moves that, collectively, could begin to enhance the prospects for the neighborhood and its citizens.
Teams were asked to consider how improved urbanism could have a positive impact on various aspects of the neighborhood, including business viability, quality public spaces, access to services, improved housing options, increased public safety, and opportunities for the community to engage and contribute.
Designs needed to leverage the variety of assets that already exist in the community including physical places, existing businesses, individuals, organizations, previous accomplishments, and sections of the built environment.
What resulted were dozens of creative, realistic, and scalable urban revitalization tactics for improving residential, commercial, and public space within a 5 minute walk radius surrounding historic Glass Street, each contributing to the revitalization effort already underway. Designs specifically addressed implementation within 1 month, 1 year, 3 year time frames, prioritizing lighter, quicker, and cheaper techniques.
While not all the proposals generated will be implemented as designed, they will be the basis of successive small neighborhood workshops to explore specific concepts, projects, and implementation tactics reflecting the residential, commercial, and public space needs of the Glass Street community. Glass House Collective will work with the neighborhood to adapt designs, ultimately using a bunch of little things to create the next big thing on the street.
Using the lenses that Glass House Collective sees their work through, the Outcomes of The Next Big Thing Urbanism Workshop have been organized into three categories:
• Here Because We Love It Here, proposals focused on Creative Placemaking
• Bringing Life Back to Glass Street, proposals focused on Feet on the Streets
• The Next Big Thing, proposals focused on New Partnerships
Not all proposals developed during the workshop are included in this document; however, those that most closely meet the mission of Glass House Collective have been compiled and described in the pages that follow. The appendix lists all project proposals from each team.
From Green Roots to Green Shoots - How did Bristol develop its sustainability...NetImpactBristol
This document summarizes the development of Bristol's sustainability movement from the 1970s to present day. It describes how citizen groups came together in the 1970s to oppose an outer circuit road project, leading to the founding of organizations like Bristol Friends of the Earth and Cyclebag (now Sustrans). These groups pioneered recycling, energy efficiency, and active transportation initiatives. The document also notes the importance of cross-sector collaboration and how youth programs and local government support helped sustainability organizations gain traction in Bristol. It concludes by reflecting on how Bristol became the UK's first Transition City and a 2015 European Green Capital.
Teeny Tiny Summit -Creatively Bringing Community Together - Sept 23Carolyn Puterbough
This document summarizes a virtual webinar about economic development in small, rural communities called the Teeny Tiny Summit. The webinar included presentations on transforming rural economies, creative collaboration projects in Fenelon Falls and Kawartha Lakes, the reimagined 2020 virtual Bayfield Agricultural Fair, and snapshots of other communities creatively bringing people together virtually. The agenda outlined three 90-minute webinar sessions to share examples, tools, and success stories for supporting small, rural places during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This document is a newsletter from the Hillside-Quadra Community in Victoria, BC. It provides information on local community events, projects, and issues. Articles discuss the Shared Assessment Committee receiving an award for its work helping families, reflections on the recent teachers' strike, and a youth group called Angels on Wheels that refurbishes and donates bicycles in the community. Advertisements seek letters to the editor, and promote advertising in the newsletter to local businesses.
Funding surgery - Heritage Lottery Fund Alison Clyde
This document provides information about the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) in Scotland. It summarizes that the HLF has funded over 2,500 community projects since 1994 using money from the National Lottery. It describes the different types of heritage and projects that HLF supports, including built, natural, and cultural heritage. It outlines several of HLF's grant programs and provides an example of a successful intergenerational oral history project. It concludes by offering tips for strong applications and highlighting common pitfalls to avoid.
The public relations plan proposes tactics to increase awareness, interest, and attendance of the Governor Henry Lippitt House Museum in Providence, Rhode Island. The plan targets college students and families with young children living in College Hill. Tactics include expanding social media presence on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, distributing press releases and PSAs to local media, creating shared digital content, producing printed materials, emphasizing the museum's brand identity, and holding fundraising events. The goal is to share knowledge of the museum as a cultural gem and community staple.
The document discusses strategies for strengthening a nonprofit organization's brand and digital presence. It emphasizes developing a clear brand personality focused on trust, and using digital tools like websites, social media, multimedia, and crowd funding to raise awareness and engage supporters. The goal is to build widespread appeal by communicating the organization's impact in a simple and consistent way that resonates with the public.
This document discusses strategies for strengthening an organization's brand and digital presence. It emphasizes developing a clear brand identity focused on trust and positive feelings. It also stresses the importance of using simple, consistent language and imagery that appeals to the general public. The document provides examples of successful digital fundraising campaigns and recommends developing multimedia content, social media engagement, and encouraging user-generated content to build the brand.
After conducting the historical research and talking to the residents, it was evident that gentrification has enriched and nourished the Long Island City area. It has gone through a great deal of transformation and improved for the better. All the cultural influence and the gorgeous restaurants along with the waterfront view of the Manhattan skyline contribute to the holistic vibe of the area.
Our Summer 2015 edition with our cover story, Topaz Park Response Shows Depth of Concern for Neighbourhood, Homeless and Parks and articles on QVCC youth programs on the rise, meet Catherine Chapman - Photographer and Jennifer Ferris - Storyteller, our featured creative neighbours and volunteer spotlight: Kathy & Blair.
This document discusses strategies for building an organization's brand and digital presence. It emphasizes that a brand is defined by how people feel about and talk about an organization, and is ultimately based on trust. It provides examples of inspirational statistics about other non-profits to demonstrate widespread public appeal. The document also outlines recommendations for developing a brand identity through a logo, color palette, photography and other visual elements. It suggests using digital tools like websites, social media, multimedia content and crowd funding to engage the public and raise funds.
Future of London 2018 Conference (afternoon breakouts side room)futureoflondon
This document summarizes a conference on overcoming barriers in London held on June 21, 2018. It includes the agenda, speaker bios, and presentations on various topics related to mobility, placemaking, and community engagement. Speakers discussed research on how the design of neighborhoods can impact health and activity as people age, as well as case studies of placemaking projects in Thamesmead and strategies for making coworking spaces more accessible. The document also summarizes breakout group discussions on barriers faced by residents and community organizations and potential community-driven solutions.
Presentation to Regionalmedien Austria (RMA) an Austrian media company. RMA distributes free (advertiser-funded) newspapers throughout Austria that include local, regional and national content, reaching almost 50% market saturation. (Wikipedia)
The document summarizes the results of a community consultation process regarding the redevelopment of the Allandale Station lands in Barrie, Ontario. Over 500 community members provided input through open houses and interviews. Six key themes emerged that should guide the redevelopment: connecting to Allandale's history and identity, the community, the environment, surrounding areas, technology, and culture/creative economy. Recommendations included restoring the train station, developing the area around it as a public space, and ensuring the redevelopment enhances Allandale's identity while attracting creative/knowledge workers.
Don Dixon created the Canadian Icons Project to photograph and interview 150 iconic Canadians to celebrate Canada's diversity and achievements, and launched the Canadian Change Conversations platform to engage these icons and Canadians in discussions about issues shaping society. The project involves a book, traveling photo exhibition, video interviews, crowdsourcing challenges, and events to encourage conversations around citizenship and positive social change.
Writing effective award nominations March 2011ABScotland
The document provides guidance for nominating partnerships for arts and business awards. It emphasizes reading the nomination guidelines closely, involving both partner organizations, and addressing what the judges are looking for through clear, compelling, convincing and concise writing. The four 'C's of an effective nomination are identified as being clear, compelling, convincing and concise. Examples of effective and edited nominations are provided.
The document discusses a community engagement event called "Walk & Talk & Nuts & Bolts" that was facilitated by the author in Redmond, Washington to involve the local community in planning for the city's historic downtown core. The author created an "Urban Diary" workbook to guide participants through the historic area and collect feedback on aspects of the built environment through open-ended questions. Twenty-six community members participated in the walking meeting and provided input. The results of the project include the successful community event and a case study report analyzing the collected feedback to inform the city's further engagement efforts.
Combined Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) Vessel List.Christina Parmionova
The best available, up-to-date information on all fishing and related vessels that appear on the illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing vessel lists published by Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) and related organisations. The aim of the site is to improve the effectiveness of the original IUU lists as a tool for a wide variety of stakeholders to better understand and combat illegal fishing and broader fisheries crime.
To date, the following regional organisations maintain or share lists of vessels that have been found to carry out or support IUU fishing within their own or adjacent convention areas and/or species of competence:
Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM)
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)
North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC)
North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO)
South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
The Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List merges all these sources into one list that provides a single reference point to identify whether a vessel is currently IUU listed. Vessels that have been IUU listed in the past and subsequently delisted (for example because of a change in ownership, or because the vessel is no longer in service) are also retained on the site, so that the site contains a full historic record of IUU listed fishing vessels.
Unlike the IUU lists published on individual RFMO websites, which may update vessel details infrequently or not at all, the Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List is kept up to date with the best available information regarding changes to vessel identity, flag state, ownership, location, and operations.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
karnataka housing board schemes . all schemesnarinav14
The Karnataka government, along with the central government’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), offers various housing schemes to cater to the diverse needs of citizens across the state. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the major housing schemes available in the Karnataka housing board for both urban and rural areas in 2024.
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
The Antyodaya Saral Haryana Portal is a pioneering initiative by the Government of Haryana aimed at providing citizens with seamless access to a wide range of government services
2. We’d like to thank all of our participants for their
contriubutions to this event.
We’d also like to thank our collaborators for shaping
and contributing to the event and Wirral Council for
their support.
Cover image: panel speakers and audience members.
Photo credit: Fiona Finchett @fionafinchett.
August 2022
Credits and thanks
3. 1
‘The Future is… Birkenhead’ event was held at
Future Yard, Birkenhead on 13 July 2022. The event
was devised by a team of people who care about
Birkenhead and the built environment. The event was
convened by Common Good who promoted it as part
of their series of events across the North of England. It
was supported by the Left Bank Collective, including
Future Yard, Convenience Gallery, Make CIC and
Open Door Charity.
PLACED were invited to be involved in the planning
and the facilitation of part of the event. Those who
organised the event did so largely in their own time
and on a pro-bono basis. The event was supported by
Wirral Council.
‘The future is... Birkenhead’
This report tries to bring together some of the
conversation which happened on the night. However,
we think it is important to remember three things:
1. This is only one event, and this report only reflects
what we heard from the people we reached.
There are more people to reach out to.
2. Conversations and work on the future of
Birkenhead have been going on for many years
with many dedicated people. Safe to say,
shaping the future of Birkenhead is an ongoing
project and this event was only one part of that
process.
3. More discussions were had between participants
which aren’t captured here, and this report is
not a definitive record. We hope this event kick
started new ideas and new collaborations.
Introduction
Image: a group of people chatting in the bar area of Future Yard. Photo credit: Fiona Finchett @fionafinchett.
4. 2
For those able to join the event from 4pm, a walking
tour took people around some of the Left Bank
Collective locations around Birkenhead. This gave
participants a great introduction and grounding
in some of the innovative, grassroots and socially
motivated action taking place in Birkenhead.
The walking tour included, Make CIC, The Bloom
Building and ended at Future Yard.
Images (anti-clockwise from top left): people walk
through Hamilton Square by the Queen Victoria
Monument, a group of people in a bar/café space,
and two people with bikes in a garden area. Photo
credit: Jaimie Ferguson @Jaimieferg.
Images (opposite page): two images of people
drawing on a white board, and marker pens, cloths
and instructions ready for participants to use. Photo
credit: Fiona Finchett @fionafinchett.
Walking tour
5. 3
The event at Future Yard kicked off with a series of
interactive activities, including mapping, writing,
voting, and questions developed by PLACED, along
with inviting people to draw on light box panels
provided by Convenience Gallery. Here we’ve
summarised the responses received through the
interactive elements.
1. What does the future of Birkenhead look like to
you?
Convenience Gallery brought their light box panels
to encourage and enable artistic expression amongst
participants. Pens were offered and participants
invited to draw or write what they thought the future of
Birkenhead looked like, creating a communal mural.
Some of the contributions included drawings illustrating
the effects of climate change on the Wirral, water
sports, cycles and Birknhead Town Hall. Participants
also wrote words like, colourful, dynamic and inclusive.
Interactive activities
6. 4
2. The regeneration puzzle
Each participant was given a puzzle piece and
asked what they thought was needed for successful
grassroots regeneration. We added all their ideas to
our communal puzzle.
Ideas included:
• Restoring walkability, (re)connecting one side of
the town to the other.
• Affordable spaces for growing/emerging
business and continuous increase in footfall.
• Remove the ‘car park’ feel and connect people
through cycling and walking.
• Use ferry to get tourists to do walking tours in the
area.
• Make walking and cycling options attractive.
Benches, street trees and cycle repair and
storage.
• Public transport providers need to work to
support visits to the area – it’s easy to get here
but people think it’s not.
• Using heritage and historical buildings in
regeneration.
• Make sure assets are owned by the community
so that they can reap the dividends from their
success.
• Don’t compete with, but work with and alongside
Liverpool! Better connections to assets.
• Accessible spaces.
• Birkenhead needs to retain and utilise more
collaborative spaces to encourage existing
local innovators to invest in the area. Short
term low rents and lots of opportunities to
collaborate.
• BELIEF
• Less highway space and more facilities for
pedestrians and cyclists and more trees!
• A space for people, not cars.
• Pop-up retail. Low rent, manageable spaces
offering short, medium and long-term leases to
start ups. Creating a dynamic and vibrant street
scape.
• An understanding of cultural policy and its power
to be a catalyst.
• Get rid of all the concrete and tarmacked space
and link up the great assets and signposting to
them!
• Creating a high street using street near future
yard.
Image: a person placing a puzzle piece with comments written on. Photo credit: Fiona Finchett @fionafinchett.
9. 7
3. Mapping the assests across Birkenhead
To understand more about and remind ourselves of the
existing assets in Birkenhead, we asked participants to
use our pin board map to show and label the places,
spaces, and organisations which they thought were
assets, or could be in the future. In no particular order,
this is our collective list:
• PEOPLE
• Grange Road West (Birkenhead’s Bold
Street)
• UK’s longest promenade
• Eureka
• Seacombe Ferry
• East Float
• Belfast Ferry
• Dock system
• Randall Street Tunnel Entrance
• American Civil Wat Heritage Trail
• ENA PA
• One O’clock Gun
• Historic Tramway
• Ventilation Tower
• Wirral Wave Radio
• Wirral Mencap
• U-Boat Story
• Hamilton Square
• Birkenhead Priory
• Pink Sands Studio
• Café 32
• Start Yard
• Transport Shed
• Dock Branch Park
• Glen Affric
• Convenience Gallery
• Future Yard
• Make CIC
• Bloom Building
• Open Door Charity
• Grand Entrance
• Equilibrium CIC
• Birkenhead Park Visitors’ Centre
• Parkrun!
• The Hive
• Tranmere Tunnels
• Cammell Laird Central Park
• Bidston Moss Woodland and Nature Area
• Bidston Hill
• Bidston Observatory
• Flaybrick Cemetery
• Tam O’Shanter Urban Farm
• Ron’s Place
• Williamson Art Gallery
• Listed Docks
Image (opposite page): Drawing pins on a map of Birkenhead. Photo credit: Fiona Finchett @fionafinchett.
10. 8
4. Quick-fire questions and voting
We asked a set of quick-fire questions and gave
participants tokens and post-it notes to vote and share
their thoughts. Intended as a ‘straw poll’ rather than
definitive answers, it offered a great starting point to
some big questions.
Other suggestions included:
• Adding a commercial element to continue
without funding.
• Land banking.
• Delays in planning process.
• Landowners who only care about financial
profit.
• Lack of imagination.
Apathy
Lack of money
Slow pace of change
Other
What are the key primers for regeneration that will
help change happen?
Other suggestions included:
• Social ‘energy’ in that it takes people to make
things happen, e.g., the panel tonight.
• Embracing dynamic leadership.
• CREATIVITY.
• Sustainability.
• The golden 3!
Towns Fund money
Social economy/enterprise
Council attitude
Other
What are the barriers to regeneration?
Graphs: three pie charts showing the responses of
participants to our quick-fire questions.
Images (opposite page): person writing a comment on
a post it note and blue and yellow vote tokens. Photo
credit: Fiona Finchett @fionafinchett.
11. 9
Are there stumbling blocks to regeneration?
(particularly for grassroots organisations)
Other suggestions included:
• Grassroots organisations not owning freehold of
their own space.
• Communication and engagement with the
public.
• Lack of an open heart and an open mind.
• Political bickering.
• Lack of resources in local authorities (not
necessarily money).
• Perception of whether ‘regeneration’ is positive
or not.
• Lack of skills for bid writing.
Mission creep
Expanding or growing
Longevity
Other
12. 10
A panel discussion with a difference. We drew our
panel from our audience in a format we called
‘rotating debating’. The aim being to include as many
voices on our panel as possible and cycle through
multiple four person panels during the 1-hour time slot.
Our questions were submitted by the audience and
drawn - tombola style - as we went along.
Our audience panel included planners, architects,
social enterprise owners, Birkenhead residents,
support workers, and academics. Thanks to David
Roberts (Common Good) for chairing and to our 16
panellists; Andrew Ruffolo, David Humphreys, Richard
MacDonald, Christine Bithell, Malarkey Buck, Aiden
Semple, Olivia Ryan, John Forbes, Rich O’Neill,
Lucy Gara, Natalya Edwards, Mell Wilson, Shannon
Conway, Ryan Gauge, Paul Harris and Greg Dickson.
Panel conversation and audience questions
We also collected a large set of questions from the
audience which we couldn’t get to in our 1-hour slot.
Below is a record of all the audience questions, both
those posed and not.
1. How do you build in a commercial element to
the regeneration to ensure projects continue
when the funding runs out?
2. When was the last time you came to
Birkenhead?
3. How many future-yards does a regeneration
neighbourhood need?
4. What excites you most about the future of the
area?
5. What will success look like in 15 years?
6. With regeneration often follows gentrification,
how can we manage this?
7. How do we ensure new infrastructure reduces
inequalities?
8. There are a lot of people in Birkenhead who
don’t buy in to the regeneration project. How do
we convince them?
9. How do we make Birkenhead more distinctive
from Liverpool? Is this going to get worse before
it gets better?
10. If you could be given an asset / vacant land,
with limited resources, what would you develop
/ want?
1
1. How much money do you need / want?
12. Where are the 1,000s of high value jobs coming
from?
13. How will we measure how inclusive Birkenhead
will be for people with disabilities?
14. How can we make sure community spaces are
used by harder to reach communities?
Image: One of our speakers with a microphone. Photo
credit: Fiona Finchett @fionafinchett.
13. 1
1
15. There is so much going on, how can we ensure
there is consistency and joined up thinking
between the various projects? Seamless
transitions!
16. Can we close the Birkenhead Tunnel to cars and
use it for cyclists, pedestrians and a busway
only?
17. Regeneration can often be disruptive for
established communities (however small), how
can equity be built into regeneration schemes
to ensure they don’t trip into ‘gentrification’ and
dissociate people from their places?
18. Birkenhead has received a lot of grant funding.
Are you worried about the current uncertainty at
central government?
19. We have a lot of history, culture and beauty to
give. How can we sell Birkenhead (and Wirral)
to others around the country / word?
20. It is 2030 Birkenhead. What is happening
/ being developed that feels too difficult /
unviable today?
21. With a need and desire for Birkenhead to be
regenerated, how do we retain the heritage
of a gritty and exciting city and not force
gentrification?
22. With regeneration of Birkenhead there
will inevitably be a knock on effect on the
surrounding areas (Prenton, New Ferry, Rock
Ferry). Is there a strategy and available funding
in-place to address this?
23. Could there be an opportunity to involve
university students in projects?
24. How impactful will Dock Branch Park be for the
town?
25. Are social enterprises a catalyst for regeneration
or is it the other way around?
26. Is the word ‘regeneration’ OK? Should we have
a better word, and if so, what should we be
saying?*
27. How do you justify spending the large capital
spend involved in programmes like Birkenhead
Town Deal / Levelling-up at a time when people
are struggling financially?*
28. Are we doing enough to ensure that change in
Birkenhead is tackling the climate emergency?
Are we ambitious enough?*
29. How do we ensure that investment in Birkenhead
doesn’t simply lead to gentrification and prices
people out of local housing, services and
amenities?*
30. What does levelling up mean for
Birkenhead?*
31. How do we make sure that the money being
spent really does level-up Birkenhead?*
*Questions added by PLACED as starter questions.
Image: Participant writing notes. Photo credit: Fiona
Finchett @fionafinchett.
14. 12
Conclusions
Our discussion covered many topics, and our panellists
offered a range of views which might not be endorsed
by everyone. However, we have tried to summarise
some of the themes and talking points here.
Words matter – ‘regeneration’ and ‘gentrification’
Regeneration as a term can be complicated,
problematic and can exclude people. This relates to
further comments about including people in discussions
about the future. Working in a bottom-up way could
help to create change which is not cookie cutter
‘regeneration’. One suggestion to avoid regeneration
as a term was ‘Birkenhead reborn’.
Related to some of these discussions were several
questions and responses about gentrification. It was
highlighted that gentrification is potentially already
happening. Community ownership and social housing
were suggested as crucial to make sure there are
alternatives to private rented sector and buying.
Reducing inequalities was also noted, suggested
measures included cycle ways, working with people,
making sure local people benefit from new jobs
created, and tackling community scale issues or
concerns like health inequalities or skills.
Talk to more people
Across several answers and responses, we heard
about the importance of including people in
discussions about the future of Birkenhead and the
processes of change. Working in a bottom-up way
could ensure change is understood and locally rooted.
This included social enterprises which can bring new
enthusiasm, local knowledge and are situated in
Birkenhead. Also, local communities, residents, young
people and teenagers, students, and academics can
all bring fresh outlooks.
To enable participation in such discussions and in life
more broadly, making sure that community spaces are
accessible to people from harder to reach groups is
also important.
Communicate a vision and shout about Birkenhead
One panellist suggested that we should remember that
the aim is not simply to change the place, but to have
a vision for the place in the future. Communicating
that vision is then really important. People need to
understand the change. It is important to acknowledge
that change is difficult. However, some things have not
changed in a long time in some parts of the town and
change is needed for local people.
It is important not to forget some of great things
about Birkenhead (see the many places and spaces
highlighted on our map). Suggestions included
Birkenhead’s heritage such as Birkenhead Priory
and Birkenhead Park, musical heritage (it’s not all
Liverpool!), and sport. Shout about these assets more.
Key projects (some happening, some still need
developing)
Dock Branch Park could be transformative, bringing
the tangible and intangible benefits green spaces can
for urban areas. Improving the transport infrastructure,
particularly walking and cycling, and connectivity
across Wirral, was discussed. Being able to walk and
cycle through the Birkenhead tunnel was suggested.
The need to remove previous generations of car heavy
infrastructure was also part of this discussion.
It was suggested that by 2030 there should be more
retail on offer, more housing, and more independent
businesses. Trying not to separate out Birkenhead from
the rest of the Wirral or the City Region is important, as
is connecting with Liverpool as part of the future.
Politics
In the midst of turbulent national politics, it is important
to scrutinise the debates or bigger picture too, e.g., the
levelling-up agenda.
At the local level, the presence of politicians, including
MPs and Councillors, listening to and participating in
such discussions was also considered important.
15. 13
Climate Change
Getting the right policy in place was felt to be
important. Making sure that we’re policy-led, and
perhaps more stick than carrot. Ensuring that climate
change is well placed in policy and sticking to it so that
new development responds properly was suggested.
There is space for innovation.
Changing consumer behaviour is also part of the
climate change challenge. As is getting big business on
board.
Image: Audience members listening to our speakers. Photo credit: Fiona Finchett @fionafinchett.
17. 15
We also asked participants to share their takeaway
messages or conclusions from the event. Here’s what
we were told:
• Would / should Birkenhead be the central
hub for Wirral regeneration to bridge the M53
divide?
• Great event. Would be good to see a short
series across a few days to get a greater
spectrum of people.
• Advocacy.
• Talk it up.
• Help change perceptions of the place.
• Learn from its best practice.
• Offer support in a pro-bono capacity as believe
in changing perceptions of Birkenhead.
• Visit more (events).
• Safe sphere. Construction, Design and
Management consultants helping projects to be
safe and save money.
• Really good to be at a semi-professional,
semi-social event and hear a genuine mix of
opinions!
• Great event! Please remember people with
disabilities, learning disabilities or people
neurodiverse when thinking about community.
People who draw on support can be assets
too.
Participant takeaways Next steps
We will be sharing this report with Wirral Council and
being part of more events to bring people together in
Birkenhead, Wirral and Liverpool City Region.
As something of a parting thought we’ll finish with this
observation from one of our panellists.
“It’s the right time, right place for Birkenhead.
It’s a really exciting time!”
Image (opposite page): Audience members listening to our speakers. Photo credit: Fiona Finchett @fionafinchett.