The document summarizes the Declaration of Sentiments written at the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848 which outlined the grievances women faced and their demand for equal rights and suffrage. It was modeled after the Declaration of Independence and signed by over 100 people. Notable leaders in the women's rights movement like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and Susan B. Anthony fought for decades for women's right to vote, which was achieved with the passage of the 19th amendment in 1920.
This is slide show I created for a History class where we answered questions and critiqued it. The documentary was called Freedom Riders directed by Stanley Nelson
This is slide show I created for a History class where we answered questions and critiqued it. The documentary was called Freedom Riders directed by Stanley Nelson
This Black History Month 'Power Point Slide Show' was one of the last emails that Clarencetta sent out before her 'Transition.' Cetta was a "Proud African American Woman." She was always willing to share funny emails and helpful information. Enjoy!
Modern History Sourcebook The Declaration of Sentiments, Seneca.docxraju957290
Modern History Sourcebook:
The Declaration of Sentiments,
Seneca Falls Conference, 1848
Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott, two American activists in the movement to abolish slavery called together the first conference to address Women's rights and issues in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848. Part of the reason for doing so had been that Mott had been refused permission to speak at the world anti-slavery convention in London, even though she had been an official delegate. Applying the analysis of human freedom developed in the Abolitionist movement, Stanton and others began the public career of modern feminist analysis
The Declaration of the Seneca Falls Convention, using the model of the US Declaration of Independence, forthrightly demanded that the rights of women as right-bearing individuals be acknowledged and respected by society. It was signed by sixty-eight women and thirty-two men.
The Declaration of Sentiments
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one portion of the family of man to assume among the people of the earth a position different from that which they have hitherto occupied, but one to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes that impel them to such a course.
We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer. while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the women under this government, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to demand the equal station to which they are entitled. The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid wor ...
This Black History Month 'Power Point Slide Show' was one of the last emails that Clarencetta sent out before her 'Transition.' Cetta was a "Proud African American Woman." She was always willing to share funny emails and helpful information. Enjoy!
Modern History Sourcebook The Declaration of Sentiments, Seneca.docxraju957290
Modern History Sourcebook:
The Declaration of Sentiments,
Seneca Falls Conference, 1848
Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott, two American activists in the movement to abolish slavery called together the first conference to address Women's rights and issues in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848. Part of the reason for doing so had been that Mott had been refused permission to speak at the world anti-slavery convention in London, even though she had been an official delegate. Applying the analysis of human freedom developed in the Abolitionist movement, Stanton and others began the public career of modern feminist analysis
The Declaration of the Seneca Falls Convention, using the model of the US Declaration of Independence, forthrightly demanded that the rights of women as right-bearing individuals be acknowledged and respected by society. It was signed by sixty-eight women and thirty-two men.
The Declaration of Sentiments
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one portion of the family of man to assume among the people of the earth a position different from that which they have hitherto occupied, but one to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes that impel them to such a course.
We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer. while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the women under this government, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to demand the equal station to which they are entitled. The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid wor ...
SENECA FALLS DECLARATIONS 2
Seneca Falls Declaration
The Seneca Falls Declaration of sentiments of 1848, was aimed at addressing issues facing women in society. Its grounds were laid on the platform of the equity of both men and women before God’s eyes. The sentiments aired out during this conference were aimed at advocating for the fair and equal treatment of women by men. It was meant to align rights of happiness, life, and liberty between men and women. Its ultimate focus on historical injustices, usurpations and absolute tyranny of men over women were the main focus of the conference (Sourcebook, 2012).
Relating to the real definition of grievances which relates to the real or imagined cause of complaint for unfair treatment. Despite the fact that The Seneca Falls Conference was useful in promoting equal treatment between men and women, I find some of the grievances least grievances. These grievances are as follows:
‘He has made her, morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many crimes with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her husband. In the covenant of marriage, she is compelled to promise obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her master--the law giving him the power to deprive her of her liberty, and to administer chastisement.’ Summary This paragraph. You copied and pasted from the reading assignment
I consider this grievance to be of least concern because its sentiments do not focus on the true aspect of marriage that has been practiced since time memorial. The claims of men becoming masters and women being compelled to promise obedience don't purport the real ideal of marriage back then. Marriage is founded on the basis of promises from both sides. The same way women made promises to their husbands, husbands also made promises to their wives. As the women had duties to oblige to, men also had their duties to play. These included promises of loyalty and catering of family needs. Trying to make marriage look like a one-sided affair is not a good vice since it cuts across all gender and requires commitment from both sides. Therefore, the claims of men depriving women of their liberty are not true thus it does not qualify a major grievance.
‘After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single, and the owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which recognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it.’ Summary This paragraph. You copied and pasted from the reading assignment
The issue of taxes and properties cuts across all gender. Paying taxes to the government is the duty of all property owners regardless of their gender. During this time, most properties and businesses were owned by men and their paid taxes to the government. Taxation of all property owners is fair whether male or female. Therefore, this grievance was less grievous be.
Aint I a WomanBy Sojourner TruthWomen’s Convention, Akron, O.docxsimonlbentley59018
Ain't I a Woman?
By Sojourner Truth
Women’s Convention, Akron, Ohio
May 28-29, 1851
"Well, children, where there is so much racket there must be something out of kilter. I think
that 'twixt the negroes of the South and the women of the North, all talking about rights, the
white men will be in a fix pretty soon. But what's all this here talking about?
That man over there says that women need to be helped into carriages and lifted over
ditches, and to have the best place everywhere. Nobody ever helps me into carriages, or
over mud-puddles, or gives me any best place! And ain't I a woman? Look at me! Look at
my arm! I could have ploughed and planted, and gathered into barns, and no man could
head me! And ain't I a woman? I could work as much and eat as much as a man- when I
could get it- and bear the lash as well! And ain't I a woman? I have borne thirteen children,
and seen them most all sold off to slavery, and when I cried out with my mother's grief,
none but Jesus heard me! And ain't I a woman?
Then they talk about this thing in the head; what's this they call it? [Intellect, somebody
whispers] That's it, honey. What's that got to do with women's rights or negro's rights? If
my cup won't hold but a pint, and yours holds a quart, wouldn't you be mean not to let me
have my little half measure-full?
Then that little man in black there, he says women can't have as much rights as men,
'cause Christ wasn't a woman! Where did your Christ come from? Where did your Christ
come from? From God and a woman! Man had nothing to do with Him.
If the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all
alone, these women together ought to be able to turn it back, and get it right side up again!
And now they is asking to do it, the men better let them.
Obliged to you for hearing me, and now old Sojourner ain't got nothing more to say."
Enfranchisement of Women
Harriot Taylor Mill
Published in one of the most prestigious periodicals in England, this essay drew on published reports in the New York Tribune to describe the series of women's rights conventions then underway in the United States. Distancing herself ever so slightly from their American style of public discourse, Taylor nevertheless endorsed the conventions' spirit and highlighted the contradiction between American democratic values and the exclusion of women from the "inalienable rights" of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Taylor concluded that "physical force" explained women's subjection to men. She praised the women's rights declarations of the American conventions, and predicted that "the example of America will be followed on this side of the Atlantic."
Most of our readers will probably learn from these pages for the first time, that there has arisen in the United States, and in the most civilized and enlightened portion of them, an organized agitation on a new question--new, not to thinkers, nor to any one by whom the principles of free and .
Read and print out this webpage about the Declaration of Senti.docxaudeleypearl
Read and print out this webpage about the Declaration of Sentiments, 1848http://ecssba.rutgers.edu/docs/seneca.html
New Study Guide Questions1. How does this Declaration compare with the Declaration of Independence? What points is it makingby imitating some aspects of the earlier declaration? What points does it echo? Does it ever critiquethe earlier declaration?
2. Where and how does the 1848 Declaration differ from the 1776 declaration? What do“sentiments” mean in 1848? (You can research this online—you must cite sources!) Cite specificlines and passages. If King George III is the villain in 1776, how would you understand theopponent in 1848?
3. Read this paragraph about the origins of The Declaration of Sentiments:
“Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott, two American activists in the movement to abolish slavery called
together the first conference to address Women's rights and issues in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848. Part of the
reason for doing so had been that Mott had been refused permission to speak at the world anti-slavery convention in
London, even though she had been an official delegate. Applying the analysis of human freedom developed in the
Abolitionist movement, Stanton and others began the public career of modern feminist analysis.”(http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/senecafalls.asp)Given that Abolitionists in England and America were often women, in what ways can you see theseearly feminists drawing upon their greater understanding of slavery to give themselves more power?Reading the The Declaration of Sentiments with this frame of reference in mind, how does it changeyour understanding of their ideals? Cite specific lines and passages.
4. Consider the resolutions before the declaration; how would you paraphrase each of these into ourcontemporary American English? Which of the 1848 concerns still serious issues for women andmen today? Cite specific lines and passages.
5. Consider the logic and reasoning used in the resolutions of 1848; how do they parallel use of logicand reason in the 1776 declaration? Consider the emotions in the two declarations; how are theyparallel or not parallel? Where does the 1848 declaration diverge from the 1776 declaration? Arethere parts that seem to be no longer valid or no longer relevant? What parts are the most relevanttoday? Cite specific lines and passages.
Read the “Address by Elizabeth Cady Stanton on Woman's RightsSeptember 1848," which fills five html pages. You have to click through the document.http://ecssba.rutgers.edu/docs/ecswoman1.html
6. Stanton in her opening explains why only a woman can speak for women. What are her reasons,and do you think they are valid even today? What is the reason that she brings up other cultures? How do women fare in her time? What is the meaning of the little quote from a Byron poem in herlecture? What famous and powerful women does she refer to, and what point is she making bybringing up their names? Cite specific lines and passages.
...
CHS 3501L FOOTWEAR Post-Lab
Name: ________________________ Section: ______
Your task is to match the shoe print of one of the four suspects to the bloody shoe impression found at the crime scene. You will need to circle and identify points of comparison on each of the five prints provided. Be sure to take measurements and comment on the patterns as well. Discuss your conclusions here. Be sure to describe how you came to a match (if any), how you were able to exclude or include suspects. Please turn in all five prints for full credit. Discussion should be typed here.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CRIME SCENE
SUSPECT 1
SUSPECT 2
SUSPECT 3
SUSPECT 4
Modern History Sourcebook:
The Declaration of Sentiments,
Seneca Falls Conference, 1848
Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott, two American activists in the movement to abolish slavery called together the first conference to address Women's rights and issues in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848. Part of the reason for doing so had been that Mott had been refused permission to speak at the world anti-slavery convention in London, even though she had been an official delegate. Applying the analysis of human freedom developed in the Abolitionist movement, Stanton and others began the public career of modern feminist analysis
The Declaration of the Seneca Falls Convention, using the model of the US Declaration of Independence, forthrightly demanded that the rights of women as right-bearing individuals be acknowledged and respected by society. It was signed by sixty-eight women and thirty-two men.
The Declaration of Sentiments
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one portion of the family of man to assume among the people of the earth a position different from that which they have hitherto occupied, but one to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes that impel them to such a course.
We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of hap ...
Women’s Suffrage1The Declaration of Sentiments”.docxlefrancoishazlett
Women’s Suffrage
1
“The Declaration of Sentiments”
(Seneca Falls, NY, July, 1848)
Organized by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and her friends
Three hundred people attended the convention in Seneca Falls, New York.
68 women and 32 men signed the “Declaration”
“…We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. “
*What document did Stanton use as her inspiration?
2
“The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman.”
He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise.
He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice.
He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead.
He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns.
He has so framed the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes of divorce; in case of separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be given; as to be wholly regardless of the happiness of women—the law, in all cases, going upon the false supposition of the supremacy of man, and giving all power into his hands.
After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single and the owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which recognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it.
He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from those she is permitted to follow, she receives but a scanty remuneration.
He closes against her all the avenues to wealth and distinction, which he considers most honorable to himself. As a teacher of theology, medicine, or law, she is not known.
3
Susan B. Anthony:
“In Favor of Women's Suffrage” (1872)
In this speech, given following her arrest for attempting to vote in the 1872 election, Anthony argues that respect for America's fundamental principles requires that women be allowed to vote.
“In thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's right, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any State to deny.”
“It was we, the people, not we, the white male citizens, nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed this Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings or liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people--women as well as men. “
4
5
Sojourner Truth
5
“Ain't I A Woman?” by Sojourner Truth
Women's Convention in Akron, OH (1854)
Well, children, where there is so much racket there must be something out of kilter. I think that 'twixt the negroes of the South and the women at the.
Top of FormLesson 1, Part 1 Foundations of American Gover.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
Lesson 1, Part 1: Foundations of American Government
"Liberty, when it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth."
-George Washington
· The Declaration of Independence
· The U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights
· The Enlightenment and Political Philosophy
Expected Outcomes
To understand the philosophical principles behind the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and how these principles influence the structure and process of government.
Overview
The United States, as a nation, was born of the American Revolution of 1776. This revolution cut the political ties between England and its American colonies. Many "Americans" living in the colonies had complained about harsh British rule. King George of England had ruled over the colonies with a heavy hand, increasing taxes with the Stamp Act and the Sugar Act, for example. These abuses began to divide the "patriots" in favor of independence and the "loyalists" in favor of the English Crown.
Tensions between the American colonials and British soldiers boiled over in the Boston Massacre, when a mob harassed British soldiers, who then fired their muskets into the crowd, killing three, mortally wounding two others, and injuring six.
Another famous incident which helped inspire the American Revolution was the Boston Tea Party of 1773, launched as a protest to the British Tea Act. This Act gave the British East India Company a tea monopoly, shutting out American traders. Bostonians disguised themselves as Mohawk Indians, then boarded the British ships and dumped all 342 containers of tea into the harbor.
Two years later, in 1775, there were more serious conflicts between colonials and British troops: the Battles of Lexington and Concord, the prelude for a full conflict. The American Revolutionary War was long, bloody and ended with the French-assisted victory of the American Continental Army in Yorktown in 1781.
An understanding of American government and politics should consider two documents related to this war and its aftermath. The first is the Declaration of Independence, which launched the American Revolutionary War; and the second is the U.S. Constitution, which replaced the post-war Articles of Confederation and which remains the highest law of the land.
This lesson analyzes these documents, noting how they were part of a trans-Atlantic Enlightenment movement with emphasis on reason, freethinking, natural law, popular sovereignty, and human equality. Many of these ideas are visible in the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson. These ideas provided the ideological and philosophical framework for the American Revolution.
After the expulsion of the English monarchy, the Articles of Confederation - in effect from 1776 to 1787 - turned the former colonies into largely autonomous states with a weak federal government. However, many people thought that this decentralized system did not solve the problem of providing for a common defense or for ...
Essay on The Womens Rights Movement
Womens Rights Thesis
Womens Right and Abortion Essay
Essay about Womens Rights Movement
Essay on The Womens Rights Movement
A Womens Right to Vote Essay
A History of Womens Rights Essay
Women Rights Reflection
Essay on Womens Right to Vote
Discuss purpose and the claim of the speech. Explain how the speech .docxtenoelrx
Discuss purpose and the claim of the speech. Explain how the speech supports this claim (logos, ethos, and/or pathos). Is the opposing side mentioned? Also, describe the method of argumentation you believe is used in the speech (Toulmin? Rogerian? A mixture of both?). Give citations to back up your points, and create a final works cited citation for this essay.
200 words
Anthony, Susan B. “
On Women’s Right to Vote
.”
EmersonKent.com.
2012.
Web. 11 May 2012
Friends and Fellow-citizens:
I stand before you to-night, under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last Presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's right, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any State to deny.
Our democratic-republican government is based on the idea of the natural right of every individual member thereof to a voice and a vote in making and executing the laws. We assert the province of government to be to secure the people in the enjoyment of their unalienable rights. We throw to the winds the old dogma that governments can give rights. Before governments were organized, no one denies that each individual possessed the right to protect his own life. liberty and property. And when 100 or 1,000,000 people enter into a free government, they do not barter away their natural rights; they simply pledge themselves to protect each other in the enjoyment of them, through prescribed judicial and legislative tribunals. They agree to abandon the methods of brute force in the adjustment of their differences, and adopt those of civilization.
Nor can you find a word in any of the grand documents left us by the fathers that assumes for government the power to create or to confer rights. The Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, the constitutions of the several states and the organic laws of the territories, all alike propose to protect the people in the exercise of their God-given rights. Not one of them pretends to bestow rights.
"All men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. Among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
Here is no shadow of government authority over rights, nor exclusion of any from their full and equal enjoyment. Here is pronounced the right of all men, and "consequently," as the Quaker preacher said, "of all women," to a voice in the government. And here, in this very first paragraph of the declaration, is the assertion of the natural right of all to the ballot; for, how can "the consent of the governed" be given, if the right to vote be denied. Again:
"That whenever any form of government becomes destructive o.
Women Rights Reflection
A Womens Right to Vote Essay
Womens Rights Essay
Womens Right and Abortion Essay
Womens Rights Thesis
Womens Rights Essay
Essay about Womens Rights Movement
Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of the Rights of ManDan Ewert
The American Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man. For use in discussion of the influence of Locke and Rousseau on the respective declarations, the differences in the declarations, and what they say about the character and priorities of their respective peoples and how subsequent history developed.
1. The Declaration of Sentiments
The Struggle for Women’s Rights
From Elizabeth Cady Stanton to Sandra
Day O’Connor
2. The Authors
• Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott wrote
the Declaration of Sentiments for the Seneca
Falls Women's Rights Convention (1848) in
upstate New York, deliberately modeling it on the
Declaration of Independence.
• Other notable supporters of women’s rights were
Susan B. Anthony and Lucy Stone. None of these
four women would live to see the day that
women gained the right to vote.
3. • Susan B. Anthony even took her fight on the road,
touring the nation and speaking on women’s
rights. Sometimes they listened, sometimes they
pelted her with rotten tomatoes.
• During this time period, women had very few
rights.
– One state upheld the decision of a husband to beat his
wife, saying that to do otherwise would “defeat the
domestic harmony of the home”
– At the convention, most women’s rights (property &
education) were fully supported. The only one that was
controversial was the right to vote.
4. • The Declaration of Sentiments marked the
first formal action of women in the United
States to gain civil rights (the right to own
property, the right to education) and suffrage
(the vote).
• It was signed by 68 women and 32 men, 100
out of some 300 attendees at the first
women's rights convention, in Seneca Falls,
New York.
• Women gained the vote in 1920, 72 years
later.
5. Timeline
• November 5, 1872: Susan B. Anthony and others
attempted to vote; some, including Anthony, are
arrested. During her trial, Anthony was not
allowed to testify on her own behalf, and the
judge commanded the (all male) jury to find her
guilty. Anthony was furious at this violation of
her rights.
• 1917: National American Woman Suffrage
Association officers meet with President Wilson.
• 1917: National Woman's Party began picketing
the White House. Many are arrested for their
actions.
6. • March 1918: A court declared invalid the White
House suffrage protest arrests.
• January 10, 1918: House of Representatives
passed the Anthony Amendment but the Senate
failed to pass it.
• May 21, 1919: United States House of
Representatives passed the Anthony Amendment
again.
• June 4, 1919: United States Senate approved the
Anthony Amendment.
• August 26, 1920: United States Secretary of State
signed the Anthony Amendment into law. (The
19th
Amendment)
7. The Declaration of Sentiments
Preamble
When, in the course of human events, it
becomes necessary for one portion of the family
of man to assume among the people of the
earth a position different from that which they
have hitherto occupied, but one to which the
laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them,
a decent respect to the opinions of mankind
requires that they should declare the causes
that impel them to such a course.
8. Statement of Beliefs
We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are
life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are
instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any
form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer
from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government,
laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to
them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will
dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient
causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to
suffer. while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to
which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing
invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it
is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future
security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the women under this government, and
such is now the necessity which constrains them to demand the equal station to which
they are entitled. The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations
on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an
absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
9. List of Complaints
The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of
man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny
over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise.
He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice.
He has withheld from her rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded
men--both natives and foreigners.
Having deprived her of this first right of a citizen, the elective franchise, thereby
leaving her without representation in the halls of legislation, he has oppressed her on
all sides.
He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead.
He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns.
He has made her, morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many crimes
with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her husband. In the covenant
of marriage, she is compelled to promise obedience to her husband, he becoming, to
all intents and purposes, her master--the law giving him power to deprive her of her
liberty, and to administer chastisement.
10. Complaints continue on…
He has so framed the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes, and in case of
separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be given, as to be wholly regardless of
the happiness of women--the law, in all cases, going upon a false supposition of the supremacy of
man, and giving all power into his hands.
After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single, and the owner of property, he has
taxed her to support a government which recognizes her only when her property can be made
profitable to it.
He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from those she is permitted to
follow, she receives but a scanty remuneration. He closes against her all the avenues to wealth
and distinction which he considers most honorable to himself. As a teacher of theology,
medicine, or law, she is not known.
He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education, all colleges being closed
against her.
He allows her in church, as well as state, but a subordinate position, claiming apostolic authority
for her exclusion from the ministry, and, with some exceptions, from any public participation in
the affairs of the church.
He has created a false public sentiment by giving to the world a different code of morals for men
and women, by which moral delinquencies which exclude women from society, are not only
tolerated, but deemed of little account in man.
He has usurped the prerogative of Jehovah himself, claiming it as his right to assign for her a
sphere of action, when that belongs to her conscience and to her God.
He has endeavored, in every way that he could, to destroy her confidence in her own powers, to
lessen her self-respect, and to make her willing to lead a dependent and abject life.
11. Declare ‘Independence’
Now, in view of this entire disfranchisement of
one-half the people of this country, their social
and religious degradation--in view of the unjust
laws above mentioned, and because women do
feel themselves aggrieved, oppressed, and
fraudulently deprived of their most sacred
rights, we insist that they have immediate
admission to all the rights and privileges which
belong to them as citizens of the United States.