A discussion of the creation of the Oversight Board by the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act: its members, legal jurisdiction, funding source, and unlimited discretion.
A discussion of Title III of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act to establish a proceeding for the adjustment of Puerto Rico debts.
A discussion of Title III of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act to establish a proceeding for the adjustment of Puerto Rico debts.
Since Puerto Rico has no recourse to either Chapter 9 of the US Bankruptcy Code or its own law, it must negotiate with its creditors without any pre-established process or framework. Under this circumstances, it is helpful to discuss the roadmap prepared by the UN, which strives to present steps that countries can take before and during debt restructuring within the context of five principles that should provide guidance in the negotiation process.
The important role of the Department of Defense in the US's policies regarding Puerto Rico: the restructuring of debt is just an excuse to increase the DoD's activity in Puerto Rico
Since Puerto Rico has no recourse to either Chapter 9 of the US Bankruptcy Code or its own law, it must negotiate with its creditors without any pre-established process or framework. Under this circumstances, it is helpful to discuss the roadmap prepared by the UN, which strives to present steps that countries can take before and during debt restructuring within the context of five principles that should provide guidance in the negotiation process.
The important role of the Department of Defense in the US's policies regarding Puerto Rico: the restructuring of debt is just an excuse to increase the DoD's activity in Puerto Rico
This presentation discusses the importance of front-end regulations when issuing debt, and the importance of conducting an adequate due diligence before investing in sovereign debt. Ignoring the details of applicable law to a bond issuance are not “back-end changes” when an issuer implements measures authorized by applicable law.
The solution is the constitution not artilce vmiscott57
With a surge of pressure being put on state legislators this year to apply for an Article V convention, here are three reasons to oppose all such constitutional convention applications.
Page 55 BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTIONA federal statute and.docxalfred4lewis58146
Page 55
BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTION
A federal statute and related regulations prohibited producers of beer from listing, on a product label, the alcohol content of the beer in the container on which the label appeared. The regulation existed because the U.S. government believed that if alcohol content could be disclosed on labels, certain producers of beer might begin marketing their brand as having a higher alcohol content than competing beers. The government was concerned that “strength wars” among producers could then develop, that consumers would seek out beers with higher alcohol content, and that adverse public health consequences would follow. Because it wished to include alcohol content information on container labels for its beers, Coors Brewing Co. filed suit against the United States government and asked the court to rule that the statute and regulations violated Coors's constitutional right to freedom of speech.
Consider the following questions as you read Chapter 3:
On which provision in the U.S. Constitution was Coors relying in its challenge of the statute and regulations?
Does a corporation such as Coors possess the same constitutional right to freedom of speech possessed by an individual human being, or does the government have greater latitude to restrict the content of a corporation's speech?
The alcohol content disclosures that Coors wished to make with regard to its product would be classified as commercial speech. Does commercial speech receive the same degree of constitutional protection that political or other noncommercial speech receives?
Which party—Coors or the federal government—won the case, and why?
Do producers and other sellers of alcoholic beverages have, in connection with the sale of their products, special ethical obligations that sellers of other products might not have? If so, what are those obligations and why do they exist?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.
2 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.
3 Describe the incorporation doctrine's role in making most guarantees of the Bill of Rights operate to protect persons not only against certain federal government actions but also against certain state and local government actions.
4 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).
5 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.
Page 56 6 Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.
7 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government a.
Scanned by CamScannerScanned by CamScannerChapte.docxtodd331
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Chapter 13:The Bureaucracy
ADA Text Version
Learning Objectives
1. Describe the formal organization of the federal bureaucracy.
2. Classify the vital functions performed by the bureaucracy.
3. Explain the present Civil Service system and contrast it with the 19th century spoils system.
4. Identify the various factors contributing to bureaucracy's growth over time.
5. Compare the means by which Congress and the president attempt to maintain control over the bureaucracy.
6. Analyze and evaluate the problems that bureaucratic organization poses for American democracy.
Introduction
The very word "bureaucracy" often carries negative connotations. To refer to an institution as a "bureaucracy" or characterize it as "bureaucratic" is usually intended as an insult. But the national bureaucracy, sometimes called the "fourth branch of government", is responsible for practically all of the day-to-day work of governing the country. While bureaucracy in the United States, consistent with our tradition of more limited government, is smaller than its counterparts in other longstanding democracies, its influence extends to almost every corner of American society. From delivery of the mail to regulation of the stock market to national defense, federal employees plan, regulate, adjudicate, enforce, and implement federal law. Despite recurrent calls to "shrink" the size of government, the federal bureaucracy remains the largest single employer in the United States. This lesson examines the bureaucracy's formal organization, its critical role in the American economy and society, and its perceived weaknesses.
Study Questions
1. How did sociologist Max Weber define bureaucracy?
2. Identify the various functions federal bureaucracies perform giving at least one example each:
a. Implementation
b. Regulation
c. Adjudication
d. Enforcement
e. Policy-making
3. How many people does the federal government employ? For what percentage of GDP does federal spending account? How does this compare to other economically advanced democracies?
4. Classify and distinguish the major types of bureaucracy in the federal government:
a. Cabinet Departments
b. Independent Agencies
c. Independent Regulatory Commissions
d. Government Corporations
5. How does the federal bureaucracy select and recruit personnel? Contrast the present civil service system with the spoils system. What advantages does the present system provide?
6. What factors explain the growth of bureaucracy over time despite recurrent calls for limiting the size of government?
7. Identify those factors in the budget process making it difficult to cut bureaucratic funding.
8. Describe the way Congress authorizes funding for the federal bureaucracy.
9. How does Congress attempt to control the federal bureaucracy?
10. How does the president attempt to control the federal bureaucracy?
11. What special problems does bureaucratic independence present in a democracy? Discuss with re.
Debunking the argument against the protection of Chapter 9 for the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority. For over 200 years bankruptcy laws in the US have been applied retroactively. PREPA's Trust Agreement has always provided for a voluntary filing of a bankruptcy proceeding, since 1979, when PREPA wa authorized to file. Members of Congress and investors are creating an uproar about the possibility of a Chapter 9 proceeding. Why?
Prof Joseph E Stiglitz's no-holds-barred Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal explicitly calling the US to task for its “imperialist past and neocolonial present” regarding Puerto Rico, and his keynote address of the Third Working Session of the UN Ad Hoc Committee on Sovereign Debt Restructuring Processes. An indictment of the sovereign debt capital market and of the US government regarding its policies over Puerto Rico.
At last the discussion of Puerto Rico’s economic and debt crises will consider the biggest restrictions that limit Puerto Rico’s authority to make the structural changes it needs: laws and regulations enacted for a bigger, more developed economy.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
1. The Congressional PROMESA
to put the uppity Commonwealth
in its place
The creation by the U.S. Congress of the
Puerto Rico Financial Oversight and Management Board
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 1
Maria de los Angeles Trigo
April 2016
2. We know that no one ever
seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it.
Power is not a means, it is an end.
— George Orwell, in 1984
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 2
3. What an inauspicious beginning.
What a clear purpose.
We finally can read a draft of the monstrosity that is the Puerto Rico Oversight,
Management, and Economic Stability Act being birthed in the halls of the US Congress:
the PROMESA of the ever-present control over Puerto Rico through the ever-despotic
territorial clause.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 3
4. I will divide my comments on the US’s PROMESA to Puerto Rico in several articles,
organized by these themes:
• the Financial Oversight and Management Board’s foundations put in place in the
bill
• the insidious extraneous government being “incorporated” into Puerto Rico’s
government structure
• the process established in the bill for a possible restructuring of debt
• the re-installation of the US’s economic powers and political interest groups as
the entities in control of Puerto Rico’s assets and investments
My comments refer to the draft issued on 29 March 2016. I may also refer to the
language used in the draft of 24 March 2016, depending on the changes made from
one draft to the other.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 4
5. THE SUMMARY THAT SAYS IT ALL
The Board is created to assist the Government of Puerto Rico in managing its public
finances, to audit the government and address the financial crisis.
The Committee’s Legislative Summary clarifies that the Board will do so in “the most
efficient and equitable manner that is respectful of the rule of law, self-governance
and all involved parties and creditors.”
Forgive my skepticism.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
5
6. The Board created is an entity within the government of Puerto Rico, but is not subject
to any control, oversight or review from either the Governor or the Legislature.
No explanations need be given as to anything the Board does. I do not know how that
works.
How an entity can be within the government of Puerto Rico, but not report to the
constitutional head of the government, I do not understand.
Maybe as a parallel government?
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
6
7. On the other hand, those creditors that were “badly hurt” in the Detroit bankruptcy
must be ecstatic. Congress adopted their view of the unjustness of their suffering, and
has declared that:
• following the 200-year precedent of the retroactiveness of bankruptcy (see my
presentation on this) is “ill conceived” and “would undermine the rule of law.”
(For sure it would undermine the rule of the law as Congress would like it to be,
not how it is.)
• prioritizing pensions over creditors “would also have serious consequences on
the broader municipal bond market.” (Detroit again.)
You may remember I had referred to these two arguments presented by the creditors
when they complained to Congress that they had suffered much in Detroit’s
bankruptcy and they said that Puerto Rico had — had — to be different. I hand it to
them: they are in the wrong in law and in equity, but boy do they indeed have the
lobbyists.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
7
8. THE UNVARNISHED PURPOSE
So this Board is an administrator of Puerto Rico’s budget, with the priorities set by the
US President through the members he appoints.
Let us be real: the Board’s purpose is to make sure the debt payments of the next few
years are made, so that the creditors that skimped in due diligence can clear their
positions and limit their losses.
Puerto Rico’s economic development?
… What? What? I don’t hear you.
Reminds me of the civil government “granted” to Puerto Rico by the Foraker Act of
1900, and whose members (including the Supreme Court) were all appointed by the
US President.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
8
9. FIRST THINGS FIRST
Nowhere in this bill is there any mention of economic recovery, economic activity,
economic research, economic structure, economic development, economic
limitations, or economic constraints. Not once do the powers of the Board mention
anything remotely related to economic activity that would set the bases for higher
government revenues.
The powers specified in the bill concentrate on controlling expenses, constraining
disbursements, and reducing the government.
And what happens after the Board’s term? Not the Board’s problem. If the
government is inoperative because of the financial squeeze? Not the Board’s problem.
If the privatized services are not up to par? Not the Board’s problem. If the economy
contracted even more under the Board’s stewardship? Not the Board’s problem.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
9
10. THE STEWARD OF THE U.S. CREDITORS
The first part of the bill sets the foundation for the Financial Oversight and
Management Board, and all the actions that will be taken by its members. The bill’s
Title I also establishes the Board’s powers, legal protections, and its unlimited
discretion.
The Board will have five members appointed by the US President, of which two must
be selected from a list provided by the Speaker of the US House of Representatives,
and other two from a similar list provided from the majority leader of the US Senate.
The initial appointment is for three years. The President can remove them only for
cause.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
10
11. The list provided by the Speaker must include a person that either maintains a primary
residence, or has a primary place of business, in Puerto Rico. The draft of 24 March
required that two people comply with this requirement, but under that draft all five
members were named by the President, although after only a consultation with the
Committees on Natural Resources of the House, and Energy and Resources of the
Senate.
The only requirement for the Board’s members is “knowledge and expertise in
finance, management, law, or the organization or operation of business or
government.” There is no requirement whatsoever for someone with some knowledge
of economic development.
Neither for some basic knowledge of Puerto Rico government structure, economic
structure, nor the legal constraints in its relationship to the US. Nothing of the sort.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 11
12. Another requirement is to have no family either be an employee or be a contractor of
the Puerto Rico government. This will disqualify a lot of knowledgeable, competent
people that could be willing to work with the Board. Is that the desired outcome?
I find it very revealing that the bill does not prohibit conflict of interest of its members
regarding present or future negotiations for the sale goods and services to the Puerto
Rico government.
There is a placeholder for a prohibition on “any other conflict of interest,” but the fact
that it is still a placeholder is, by itself, remarkable.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 12
13. THE CRACK DOWN
Although the bill makes clear that the civil service laws of the federal government do
not apply to the Board, it provides for the recruitment of federal employees, who may
elect to be considered as federal employees while they are employed by the Board.
More interestingly, a person who is recruited by the Board may elect to be considered
a federal employee for purposes of the Thrift Savings Plan, life insurance, and health
insurance.
I suppose this is considered a carrot to make it easier for the Board to recruit qualified
personnel. Congress must know it will not be easy.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
13
14. The most jarring provision of this bill (and the one who makes obvious its intent) is the
authorization that the:
“Board shall ensure the purposes of this Act are met including by prompt
enforcement of the laws of Puerto Rico prohibiting public sector employees from
participating in a strike or lock out.”
This prohibits dissent. After centuries of police and military repression, and decades of
persecution by the FBI, such a blanket statement of “ensur[ing] the purposes of this
Act are met” makes me expect a Board that will believe the ends justify any means.
Very bad times may be here again.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
14
15. In that same vein: any officer or employee of the Puerto Rico government who
intentionally provides to the Board information that is false or misleading shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $1,000.
Note that this crime is reserved for officers or employees of the Puerto Rico
government; it doesn’t apply to any federal government employee providing services
to the Board, not to any employee recruited directly by the Board. It still makes my
blood boil, even if this version eliminated the year of jail that was incorporated in the
24 March draft.
The 24 March draft also provided for a Chief Management Officer that would have
been responsible for the oversight and supervision of departments and functions of
the Puerto Rico government. The 30 March draft eliminated this position that was
tasked with improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the Puerto Rico government.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 15
16. NOW, THE COURTS
Any action related to the bill must be brought in the District Court for the District of
Columbia, and any order may be appealed only to the Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia.
Even more astounding, the term to petition for a review by the US Supreme Court is
reduced to 10 days (the normal term is 90 days).
Does this mean there is mistrust in Congress towards the Puerto Rican judges sitting in
the federal court in Puerto Rico? This bill is drafted for Puerto Rico, and all titles of it
apply to Puerto Rico. Nevertheless, the legal actions have to brought before the
federal court in the District of Columbia?
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 16
17. What is the purpose of requiring that any action related to the bill be brought in the
District Court for the District of Columbia, and appealed only to the Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia?
To make it more difficult and expensive for Puerto Rico and Puerto Ricans to litigate?
That if the US Supreme Court held in Puerto Rico’s favor in the two cases pending this
term, Puerto Rico would think about challenging the territorial clause as the legal basis
for this bill?
And that in that case, it would be better for the US if Puerto Rico had to do that before
courts unfamiliar with its legal relationship with the US, and far away from San Juan?
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 17
18. Title III on Adjustment of Debts is the only title of the bill that applies to other
jurisdictions, and the bill states that the federal court with venue for actions under
that title is the district court for the territory.
So this exclusive jurisdiction in the District of Columbia courts was included to affect
only Puerto Rico.
Importantly, the bill prohibits an injunctive relief against the Board to take effect
before all appeals have been taken or until the order is final. This means that a
decision by a court prohibiting the Board to do something or ordering it to do
something cannot take effect until no party has any other appeal to file.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 18
19. SAVED BY THE BILL
Neither the Board, its members nor employees are liable for any claim against the
Board, its members, its employees, or the Puerto Rico government that results from
actions taken to carry out this Act.
Note that the bill does not exempt the Puerto Rico government nor its employees
from claims that result from the implementation of the bill, even though the bill
makes it a misdemeanor to disobey an order from the Board!
The Puerto Rico government is not exempt from liability for following the orders of the
Board.
Does Congress want to keep a pocket open, and it will be the Puerto Rico
government?
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 19
20. WHERE COMES THE WALLET
The Board will establish its own budget, and may make sure that its control over the
budgetary process of the Puerto Rico government will grant it sufficient funds to
operate at the level of expenses it deems necessary.
Its budget is not subject to any kind of review, since the “annual expenses of the
Oversight Board as determined in the Oversight Board’s sole and exclusive discretion.”
In addition, the Puerto Rico government must provide a “dedicated funding source”
that is not subject to subsequent legislative appropriations.
I suppose the easiest thing would be to create a new revenue stream: a new tax that
could be called the Board Imposed and Added Tax Stream, or BIATS.
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 20
21. Now let me discuss the fun part of this Title I: the authorization granted to the Board
to issue, in the name of Puerto Rico, bonds sufficient to fund the Board for at least five
years.
Congress will appropriate funds (the amount is still blank) so the Board can hire
professionals to assist it in the organization of the Board and the process of
establishing a funding source.
Here you have it:
• Congress authorizes the Board to issue long-term debt for operational expenses
• appropriates funds for the hiring of financiers and consultants to issue such
bonds
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 21
22. SELF-DETERMINATION
And in case you, like me, thought that we were back to the future in 1900, do not
despair.
The bill wants to remind us that:
“Nothing in this Act shall be interpreted to restrict Puerto Rico’s rights to
determine its future political status…”
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 22
23. WHOSE INTERESTS?
The cards are clearly stacked in favor of creditors, for whose protection the Board was
conceived.
The tasks of the Board are to squeeze Puerto Ricans to provide for the payment of
debt, and, more galling, to provide funding for the Board that will set its own
“standard of living.”
And so, the bases are set for the interests and priorities of the US government and the
powerful lobbyist groups to take public center stage in the management of Puerto
Rico resources.
My next article will discuss the takeover of the Puerto Rico government by this Board
— what in Puerto Rico we can call “the empire strikes again going back to the future.”
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 23
24. INTERESTING ARTICLES
“Puerto Rico is a test of whether financial interests control Washington”
Lawrence H. Summers, The Washington Post, 28 October 2015
“What the United States Owes Puerto Rico. Allowing the U.S. territory to fall prey to
the claws of vulture creditors is unjust and unacceptable”
Joseph E. Stiglitz and Mark Medish, The Wall Street Journal, 13 August 2015
“What's holding back the world economy?”
Joseph Stiglitz and Hamid Rashid, The Guardian, 8 February 2016
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 24
25. RELATED POSTS
In SlideShare
Crisis and status: Puerto Rico on the brink
The Nobel Prize and Puerto Rico
In LinkedIn
The devil is in the details: Congress and restructuring
…and Congress said: “We’ll do nothing”
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 25
26. Originally published in LinkedIn:
The Congressional PROMESA
to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place
31 March 2016
The Congressional PROMESA to put the uppity Commonwealth in its place 26
An attorney and CPA, I help clients understand Puerto Rico’s public finance market and its
legal and regulatory framework. I aim to provide you with insights and information rooted
in Puerto Rico’s history, and legal and political status, so you can better understand Puerto
Rico’s fiscal and legal structures.
If you found the article helpful, please share it with those who might find it interesting. If
you would like to receive future articles, just click the follow button, here in SlideShare
and in LinkedIn.