At last the discussion of Puerto Rico’s economic and debt crises will consider the biggest restrictions that limit Puerto Rico’s authority to make the structural changes it needs: laws and regulations enacted for a bigger, more developed economy.
TPP - Secret Surrender of Sovereignty - tna - 11-19-12miscott57
Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations, which subordinate American law to international tribunals, are being conducted in secret — for U.S. citizens and politicians, not corporations.
TPP - Secret Surrender of Sovereignty - tna - 11-19-12miscott57
Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations, which subordinate American law to international tribunals, are being conducted in secret — for U.S. citizens and politicians, not corporations.
Why the Balanced Budget Amendments are false ideas.
Done by premiere Constitutional lawyer. Read and understand the devious and or mis-understood reasons why attempts to amend the Constitution are dangerous to your health and treasure.
Prof Joseph E Stiglitz's no-holds-barred Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal explicitly calling the US to task for its “imperialist past and neocolonial present” regarding Puerto Rico, and his keynote address of the Third Working Session of the UN Ad Hoc Committee on Sovereign Debt Restructuring Processes. An indictment of the sovereign debt capital market and of the US government regarding its policies over Puerto Rico.
A discussion of the creation of the Oversight Board by the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act: its members, legal jurisdiction, funding source, and unlimited discretion.
Debunking the argument against the protection of Chapter 9 for the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority. For over 200 years bankruptcy laws in the US have been applied retroactively. PREPA's Trust Agreement has always provided for a voluntary filing of a bankruptcy proceeding, since 1979, when PREPA wa authorized to file. Members of Congress and investors are creating an uproar about the possibility of a Chapter 9 proceeding. Why?
Since Puerto Rico has no recourse to either Chapter 9 of the US Bankruptcy Code or its own law, it must negotiate with its creditors without any pre-established process or framework. Under this circumstances, it is helpful to discuss the roadmap prepared by the UN, which strives to present steps that countries can take before and during debt restructuring within the context of five principles that should provide guidance in the negotiation process.
The important role of the Department of Defense in the US's policies regarding Puerto Rico: the restructuring of debt is just an excuse to increase the DoD's activity in Puerto Rico
A discussion of Title III of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act to establish a proceeding for the adjustment of Puerto Rico debts.
This presentation discusses the importance of front-end regulations when issuing debt, and the importance of conducting an adequate due diligence before investing in sovereign debt. Ignoring the details of applicable law to a bond issuance are not “back-end changes” when an issuer implements measures authorized by applicable law.
The economic competition between US and China increases with time. United States companies are looking for to depend less in China for its production and are setting up operations in other countries. One trend is to bring production close to home, in what is known as “nearshoring”. The advantage to this is that as their operation are near home, the time and cost of bringing the goods to the US market is lower than bringing them from China.
This article will examine what are the opportunities that nearshoring can present for Peru, if Peru is prepared for that or has a plan for it, and if US government is approaching Peru government for that effect.
Why the Balanced Budget Amendments are false ideas.
Done by premiere Constitutional lawyer. Read and understand the devious and or mis-understood reasons why attempts to amend the Constitution are dangerous to your health and treasure.
Prof Joseph E Stiglitz's no-holds-barred Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal explicitly calling the US to task for its “imperialist past and neocolonial present” regarding Puerto Rico, and his keynote address of the Third Working Session of the UN Ad Hoc Committee on Sovereign Debt Restructuring Processes. An indictment of the sovereign debt capital market and of the US government regarding its policies over Puerto Rico.
A discussion of the creation of the Oversight Board by the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act: its members, legal jurisdiction, funding source, and unlimited discretion.
Debunking the argument against the protection of Chapter 9 for the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority. For over 200 years bankruptcy laws in the US have been applied retroactively. PREPA's Trust Agreement has always provided for a voluntary filing of a bankruptcy proceeding, since 1979, when PREPA wa authorized to file. Members of Congress and investors are creating an uproar about the possibility of a Chapter 9 proceeding. Why?
Since Puerto Rico has no recourse to either Chapter 9 of the US Bankruptcy Code or its own law, it must negotiate with its creditors without any pre-established process or framework. Under this circumstances, it is helpful to discuss the roadmap prepared by the UN, which strives to present steps that countries can take before and during debt restructuring within the context of five principles that should provide guidance in the negotiation process.
The important role of the Department of Defense in the US's policies regarding Puerto Rico: the restructuring of debt is just an excuse to increase the DoD's activity in Puerto Rico
A discussion of Title III of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act to establish a proceeding for the adjustment of Puerto Rico debts.
This presentation discusses the importance of front-end regulations when issuing debt, and the importance of conducting an adequate due diligence before investing in sovereign debt. Ignoring the details of applicable law to a bond issuance are not “back-end changes” when an issuer implements measures authorized by applicable law.
The economic competition between US and China increases with time. United States companies are looking for to depend less in China for its production and are setting up operations in other countries. One trend is to bring production close to home, in what is known as “nearshoring”. The advantage to this is that as their operation are near home, the time and cost of bringing the goods to the US market is lower than bringing them from China.
This article will examine what are the opportunities that nearshoring can present for Peru, if Peru is prepared for that or has a plan for it, and if US government is approaching Peru government for that effect.
The Jones Act, Section 27, Merchant Marine Act of 1920, Title 46 United States Code §883 requires all waterborne transportation between points within the United States be carried by vessels built in the United States, owned by U.S. citizens, and crewed by U.S. citizens.
The costs associated with domestic-build requirements of the Jones Act are suggested as a major impediment for shipping companies to compete in the marketplace.
The operation of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, Capital Construction Fund Tax Deferral Program (CCF Program), the Federal Financing Guarantee Program (Title XI Program), and the U.S. Department of Transportation Tiger Discretionary Grant Program (DOT Tiger Discretionary Grant Program) are Federal programs designed to level the playing field.
Matson Navigation has utilized the CCF Program for its new vessels. The Hawaii Department of Transportation has received DOT Tiger Discretionary Grants to modernize harbors within the Port of Hawaii system.
$600 Million has been made available for the DOT FY 2014 Tiger Discretionary Grant Program. Applications are due April 28, 2014. Source: <http: />
Build on our Past for our Future.
2Running head THE JONES ACTThe Jones Act 2.docxjesusamckone
2
Running head: THE JONES ACT
The Jones Act 2
The Jones Act of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920
Latissa Butler
American Public University
Dr. Wallace Burns
February 23, 2020
The Jones Act of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920
The century-old Merchant Marine law of 1920, also known as "Jones Act" has been part of a contentious topic in the U.S for a long time. Jones Act has seen an excessive strain in the economy with prices of goods in many states hiking due to the restriction of foreign ships into U.S water territorials. There has also been a tremendous impact on the environment and internal revenue. The limits have impacted heavily on people living in the coasts of Hawaii, Alaska the island of Puerto Rico and Guam as a result of the Section 27 act which only allows "cabotage".
Conversely, the federal law has fostered domestic shipbuilding leading to increased employment and a boost to national security. Jones Act also allows the compensation of sailors who might experience accidents in the line of duty. If this were to happen, I am in support of the repealing part of the law that acts as a burden to the American citizen.
Since its enactment to law, the Jones Act, has hit hardest on the economy of U.S. despite the reforms done on Section 28. The restrictions on vessels made and operated by Americans has led to the variability in the shipping rates. The cost of transporting commodities has risen drastically due to the lack of competition from foreign markets, ultimately leading to an increase in prices of goods (Washington Post, 2010). Shipping industries locally, on the other hand, have increased the costs of the services they offer. The move to raise the prices of the available commodities has seen many citizens seeking for alternative means of importing and transporting their produce from the neighboring countries. The lack of a free market that has move to the states, must settle for higher prices than others due to the difference in the shipping cost. According to The International Trade Commission's 1995 Analysis, the cost incurred during the transportation of goods by these means apart from the sea is also high and impact on the economy of the country. The amount of fuel consumption during transporting goods through road is too expensive when evaluated.
The effect of the Jones Act on the environment has also been felt across the state. The smoke and gases released as a result of traffic have led to the rise in temperatures in a different part of America. Carbon emission has, in the past, contributed to high cost incurred when managing. Additionally, the restriction has led to a loss in the amount of foreign revenue in the U.S. Due to this fact, a lot of bilateral agreements have failed as a result of the Jones Act law which has consequently had an effect on the economy of the U.S (Hoxie, Phillip, Smith & Vincent, 2019). In my opinion, based on the impact the law has on the economy of the co.
Legislative changes in the UK and the US during the past 10 years have increased the complexity of dealing with US-connected clients. To know more read this PDF document.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
1. Crisis and Status:
PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 1
MARIA DE LOS ANGELES TRIGO
AUGUST 2015
2. THE PUBLIC DISCUSSION
OF PUERTO RICO’S
FISCAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS
HAS SHIFTED
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 2
3. Congress is finally discussing the link between Puerto Rico’s undefined political status and its
economic conditions.
Economists, financial analysts, and the press are discussing how its political status restricts
Puerto Rico’s prospects for economic growth.
It seems that the discussion of Puerto Rico’s economic and debt crises will start to consider the
biggest restrictions on Puerto Rico’s authority to make the structural changes it needs: laws and
regulations enacted for a bigger, more developed economy.
Finally.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 3
4. The Latest
On 29 June 2015 Puerto Rico issued the Krueger Report, prepared by Prof. Anne O. Krueger,
former Managing Director of the IMF. The Report identifies US control on several economic and
regulatory variables as having a disproportionately negative effect on Puerto Rico, and restricting
Puerto Rico’s authority to make the structural changes needed.
The New York Federal Reserve Board’s Report on the Competitiveness of Puerto Rico’s Economy
issued on 29 June 2012 also identified instances in which the political status restricts Puerto Rico
economic growth.
Of course many people in Puerto Rico had, before this, discussed and quantified some of these
restrictions. But it seems the conversation changer has been that these two reports agree, and
that they are issued by institutions and persons whose objectivity and credentials cannot be
questioned. Another reason, certainly, is that there is no more deficit financing available to keep
a lid on this.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 4
5. Let Me Countthe Ways
THESE ARE THE MAJOR ISSUES THESE REPORTS HAVE IDENTIFIED AS
RESTRICTIONS IN PUERTO RICO’S COMPETITIVENESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
THAT ARE A DIRECT RESULT OF ITS POLITICAL STATUS
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 5
6. Jones Act of 1920
The Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (the Jones Act of 1920) was enacted by the US “for the
national defense and for the proper growth of its foreign and domestic commerce … shall have a
merchant marine of the best equipped and most suitable types of vessels sufficient to carry the
greater portion of its commerce and serve as a naval or military auxiliary in time of war or
national emergency.”
Among its requirements, no merchandise can be transported by water between points of the US,
“either directly or via a foreign port, or for any part of the transportation, in any other vessel than
a vessel built in and documented under the laws of the United States and owned by persons who
are citizens of the United States, or vessels to which the privilege of engaging in the coastwise
trade is extended…”
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 6
7. • This means all merchandise transported by water between points of the US must be carried
by:
• vessels built in the US,
• crewed by US citizens,
• flagged by the US, and
• supplied by US sources.
• The US Merchant Marine has been identified as expensive and inefficient, with inadequate
and old vessels.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 7
8. • Puerto Rico being an island, most of its trade is done by maritime transport. And since 47% of
its imports and 72% of its exports are with the US, its trade is restricted to the US Merchant
Marine.
• Hawaii, for example, does the majority of its trade with Asia, so it doesn’t use the US
Merchant Marine to the level Puerto Rico has to.
• Alaska has an exemption for the transportation of oil. Puerto Rico has one exemption: for
passenger cruise ships.
• While there is a general cry for an increase in the use of natural gas in the production of
energy by PREPA, the electric power service authority, Puerto Rico will not be able to buy gas
from the cheapest producers in the US southern coast, because the US Merchant Marine
doesn’t have vessels that can transport natural gas.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 8
9. • Among the reasons the transshipment port in Puerto Rico’s southern coast hasn’t taken off is
that the Jones Act increases the transportation costs so much that transportation companies
prefer to use foreign transshipment ports.
• Ships use transshipments ports in the Dominican Republic and Jamaica because they can
continue their route towards ports in the US. A ship stopping in Puerto Rico on its way to a US
port would have to move the cargo to a US Merchant Marine vessel to sail from Puerto Rico
to a US port — a very expensive proposition.
• The Jones Act has almost eliminated Puerto Rico’s opportunity to benefit from its
geographical location and participate in the maritime transshipment industry.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 9
10. International Commerce and Treaties
• Since the US controls Puerto Rico’s international relations, Puerto Rico’s interests are not
adequately negotiated or defended. Every time Puerto Rico has tried to establish limited
commercial relationships with big economies, the intervention by the US Department of State
has put paid to the effort.
• The treaties the US has signed on trade expressly include Puerto Rico as part of the treaty,
with no grandfathering and no protection for its productive sectors, and no participation in its
negotiation.
• Every free trade agreement the US has signed, like NAFTA, CAFTA, and the many bilateral
trade treaties, has eroded Puerto Rico’s competitive advantages. The US has not authorized
Puerto Rico the use of additional tools to make up for this erosion. At present, the US is
negotiating trade treaties with Asia and Europe, and Puerto Rico cannot plan for the effects
those treaties will have in its economic development strategy.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 10
11. • Even section 936 of the US Internal Revenue Code, mentioned as the cause for the
precipitous decline in manufacturing, was repealed in 1995 because it was prohibited under
the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures that the US signed in 1994.
• The US didn’t grandfather Puerto Rico; it enacted the 10-year phase-out to be in compliance
with the Agreement.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 11
12. Automatic Application of Federal Laws
• Federal laws automatically apply to Puerto Rico, unless they are “locally inapplicable.” That
means that every law applies in Puerto Rico regardless of its reasons for enactment, except if
Puerto Rico is explicitly excluded, or if the inapplicability is obvious. For all the other enacted
laws, a court would have to declare whether it is “locally inapplicable.”
• The same happens with regulations, independently of the effect they may have in Puerto
Rico.
• And, unsurprisingly, no US Court has ever held that a federal law is “locally inapplicable” to
Puerto Rico.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 12
13. • The impact in Puerto Rico of the law may be contrary to the law’s purposes.
• This is what economists report happens with the minimum wage. Both the Krueger and FRB
Reports discuss the effects, and much better than I could.
• What I will add is that for years, Puerto Rico was exempt from the federal minimum wage and
it established its own, per industry, responding to the economic realities of the country and
the supply and demand of jobs and workers.
• Under pressure of US labor unions, who alleged this lower minimum wage gave a cost
advantage to Puerto Rico, the federal government revoked the authorization. It granted
moratoriums of a few years after every change in the minimum wage so industry adapted to
the new costs. Eventually it revoked that too, and now the minimum wage applies
automatically.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 13
14. • The financial assistance programs have the same effect. The Krueger and FRB Reports discuss
the effects and recommend modifying the conditions of these programs to adapt them to
Puerto Rico’s realities.
• It is important to note that Puerto Rico has already tried, several times, to negotiate this issue
with the US government, without success.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 14
15. Fiscal Autonomy and Congressional Control
• The fiscal autonomy granted to Puerto Rico is quite limited, as has been shown most recently
by the refusal of the US Judiciary to grant Puerto Rico the authority to create a framework to
restructure its debt, as an issuer with real fiscal autonomy could.
• But because of the political status, the US Congress has been able to prohibit Puerto Rico’s
municipalities to restructure under Chapter 9 of the US Bankruptcy Code. I discussed this in
more detail here and here.
• The end result is that both the US Congress and the US Judiciary are blocking Puerto Rico
from using the mechanisms that other issuers all over the world have available and can use to
deal with the restructuring of their debt.
• In addition, Puerto Rico has no access to debtor-in-possession credit through international
institutions, as mentioned in both the Krueger and FRB Reports and briefly in my post here.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 15
16. Our (Im)perfect Love
Certainly there are reciprocal benefits to the particular symbiotic relationship between the US
and Puerto Rico, most of which are not adequately discussed by financial analysts, much less by
credit rating agencies.
But it is time the discussion was more realistic and nuanced. After all, no relationship is perfect.
Some are not even perfectly imperfect.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 16
17. On to the Future
Puerto Rico’s government has fallen quite short in its responsibility of monitoring these issues. It
is not enough to have researchers investigate, quantify, make recommendations, and propose
solutions. It is necessary for the government to act. What good is having the best and brightest if
you will discard their recommendations? Ignore the solutions you are proposed? Disregard the
warnings?
Many of the issues raised by the Krueger and FRB Reports have been known in Puerto Rico for
decades, but nothing was done: it was too difficult, too complicated, too risky, too much, too
something. So we let this situation fester when we knew what had to be done.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 17
18. The economic consequences of the relationship between Puerto Rico’s political status and the
economic crisis are served, and by fiscal conservatives no less.
Puerto Rico, this time, it really is up to you. Dare, and do.
Finally. Do.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 18
19. Extras
A presentation by Prof. Krueger of her report can be downloaded here.
More information on the Congressional Hearing on “Procedures regarding Puerto Rico’s political
status and economic outlook” can be found here, with a replay of the hearing and written
testimonies. The Hearing Memo can be found here.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 19
20. Originally published in LinkedIn
Crisis and status: Puerto Rico on the brink
3 July 2015
This presentation has been revised from the original post.
Maria de los Angeles Trigo, an attorney and certified public accountant, helps clients understand Puerto Rico’s public
finance market. She advises financial institutions, investors, law firms, and government institutions on Puerto Rico debt’s
legal and regulatory framework. Maria de los Angeles worked for 16 years in the Government Development Bank for
Puerto Rico and was the highest-ranking career legal officer as Director of the Compliance Department and Acting
Deputy Director of the Legal Division.
If you would like to receive future posts, just click the follow button, here in SlideShare and in LinkedIn.
CRISIS AND STATUS: PUERTO RICO ON THE BRINK 20