The arrow in part b is either above or below the mean (a) Transtome th.pdf

•

0 likes•4 views

The arrow in part b is either above or below the mean (a) Transtome tha age 10 a 2 scone (b) interpiet toe resuls (c) Deternine whether the age s unusuat (a) Transtom the age to a zscore. (typo an niteger or decmal rounded in two gecimal places as needed) (b) irlephet the resuas An age of 32% standart cevision(s) the mean (Tyee an integer ar decimal lounsed to two decamal places as neoded). (c) Determone whethar the oge s unusial Chose the contect atswor belos A. Yos ths value so unusual. A z score toetiveen 22 and 2 is inutual: B. No, thrs valae 5 not wrusual A 2 scone beticen 2 and 2 is not uninuar c. Yes the vaise is unusus. A scove culsode of the range toon 2102 i unusual 0. No, this value is not unseyat A bscore oulsise of the range tion 2 to 7 is not ininual.

Education

More from SeanmxeHardacrea

The averopt tobin for larse-cap semestic seck funds over the thite yea.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The average score of all Canadians regarding their degree of worry abo.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The assembly division of Canterbury Watches- Inc- uses the FIFO method.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The arrival of messages at a Web site can be described by a Poisson process. The average number of messages that arrive at the Web site is 6000 messages per minute. (a) What is the probability that at most 500 messages are received in five seconds? (Round to four decimal places.) (b) If more than 125 messages arrive in one second, the website will go down. What is the probability that the website will go down? (Round to four decimal places.).

The arrival of messages at a Web site can be described by a Poisson pr.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

the answers are 1.utilitarianism 2.respect for nature 3. animal rights A. Many places that humans greatly value or enjoy visiting would be off limits if they are also use by individual non-human animals who may be impacted, hurt, or killed by human presence. B. Certain species may be considered more important than others or prioritized over other species. To some extent, in this perspective, the importance of a species to ecosystem functioning influences how humans 'should' intervene in the environment. C. Prioritizing individual animals requires radical changes to the ways we currently interact with animals, across agriculture, pet ownership, conservation, etc. This would be difficult to implement and have far reaching impacts. D. It can be difficult to compare and weigh different types and degrees of harm involving animals, especially when moving from the individual to the population and/or species. E. Prioritizing animals as individuals may mean losing more species to extinction, since this perspective prefers individual animals to be free in the wild even if raising and caring for some individuals in captivity could benefit the species population numbers. F. Some individuals may still be harmed or forced to pay the price for what is deemed "good" or the "best" outcome possible overall. 6. Determining the "best outcome" or how to "limit suffering" can be difficult to assess. Some stakeholders do not get an informed say (e.g, animals or people who may not know conservation decisions are being made). H. An introduced species, which may thrive in an environment, may have to be removed or killed to return the ecosystem to a "normal" or "natural" state. In acdition it isn't always clear what version of a "natural state" we ought to return to..

the answers are 1-utilitarianism 2-respect for nature 3- animal right.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

the answers are 1.utilitarianism 2.respect for nature 3. animal rights A. Many places that humans greatly value or enjoy visiting would be off limits if they are also used by individual non-human animals who may be impacted, hurt, or killed by human presence. B. Certain species may be considered more important than others or prioritized over other species. To some extent, in this perspective, the importance of a species to ecosystem functioning influences how humans 'should' intervene in the environment. C. Prioritizing individual animals requires radical changes to the ways we currently interact with animals, across agriculture, pet ownership, conservation, etc. This would be difficult to implement and have far reaching impacts. D. It can be difficult to compare and weigh different types and degrees of harm involving animals, especially when moving from the individual to the population and/or species. E. Prioritizing animals as individuals may mean losing more species to extinction, since this perspective prefers individual animals to be free in the wild even if raising and caring for some individuals in captivity could benefit the species population numbers. F. Some individuals may still be harmed or forced to pay the price for what is deemed "good" or the "best" outcome possible overall. G. Determining the "best outcome" or how to "limit suffering" can be difficult to assess. Some stakeholders do not get an informed say (e.g., animals or people who may not know conservation decisions are being made). H. An introduced species, which may thrive in an environment, may have to be removed or killed to return the ecosystem to a "normal" or "natural" state In addition it isn't a ways clear what version of a "natural state" we ought to return to..

the answers are 1-utilitarianism 2-respect for nature 3- animal rights.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The amphibian populations in Lake X have been observed to be declining in recent years. Anthropogenic factors were suspected and an investigation was initiated to collect information in the area around Lake X as well as similar ecosystems in other locations the state of New York. In addition to Lake X, 30 other lakes were studied. Species abundance in the aquatic, sediment, and terrestrial habitat were surveyed. Human activities around the areas of each lake were evaluated. Chemical analyses of both environmental and biota samples were conducted and pathological analyses were carried out on selected species within each site. The preliminary results are listed below. Please examine the results and determine what kind of implications or preliminary prediction/hypothesis you can make to identify the most probably reason for the decline of amphibian populations in Lake X. Each subsequent line of evidence should be evaluated together with all previous ones 1. (Example) Among the 30 lakes examined, decrease in amphibian populations was only observed in 18 lakes that receives discharges from waste water treatment plants. In addition to amphibians, decrease in fish populations was also reported in 15 of the 18 lakes. Chemical herbicides have been routinely applied in 17 of the 18 lakes for invasive aquatic plant control and the chemicals are known to be toxic to fish. Their toxicity to amphibians is unclear. In comparison, no decline in fish populations was observed in Lake X. History of herbicide applications in Lake X is not available. There is no direct waste water discharge into Lake X but one of the tributaries does receive waste water from a nearby town. Both the herbicide and contaminants in the waste water are considered potential causes for the decline of amphibians in these lakes. Since the fish in Lake X did not seem to have been affect, herbicide may not have been used, or at least not as frequently, as the lakes with fish population declines. 2. Compared to lakes that neither receive waste water discharge nor herbicide treatment, relatively fewer number of fish species were spotted in contaminated lakes. Species that are more tolerant to environmental toxicants dominated the contaminated lakes. Similar patterns were observed in sediment and terrestrial species in/around these lakes. 3. Amphibians in the 18 contaminated lakes are dominated by adult individuals compared to uncontaminated lakes, where individuals of both adults and juveniles were observed. In Lake X, adults appeared healthy, and their average bodyweight is slightly higher than those in the contaminated lakes. 4. Pathology studies revealed that fish in all lakes that received herbicide treatment exhibit lesions similar to those seen in fish exposed to herbicides under laboratory conditions. Adult amphibians in contaminated lakes had significantly enlarged liver which is a general indicator for exposure to toxicants. However, adult amphibians in Lake X did not exhibit any pat.

The amphibian populations in Lake X have been observed to be declining.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The amphibian populations in Lake X have been observed to be declining (1).pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The amount of water in a bottle is approximately normally distributed.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

TB 06-16 The official unemployment rate- The official unemployment rat.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The accompanying table describes results from groups of 8 births from.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The 3 companies will be analyzed- Haier (founded in China)- Electrolux (2).pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The above figure shows Bobby's indifference map for juice and snacks-.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The 2010 U.S. Census found the chance of a household being a certain size. The data is in the table below. Table: Household Size from U.S. Census of 2010 Size of household 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 or more Probability 26.7% 33.6% 15.8% 13.7% 6.3% 2.4% 1.5% A. State the random variable (hint: the x). B.Is it unusual for a household to have six people in the family? (hint: x6) C.If you did come upon many families that had six people in the family, what would you think? (explain) D.Is it unusual for a household to have four people in the family? (hint: x4, x4).

The 2010 U-S- Census found the chance of a household being a certain s.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

The 3 companies will be analyzed- Haier (founded in China)- Electrolux (1).pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

Textbook- Probability- An Introduction with Statistical Applications (.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

Textbook- Probability- An Introduction with Statistical Applications ( (1).pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

Task: Given the Table of Number of Athletes by National Olympic Committees and the Table of 2012 Summer Olympics Medal, from your own perspective, find out the three counties (No.1, No.2, No.3) which has the highest productivity. Table 1: Number of Athletes by National Olympic Committees in 2012 Summer Olympics Game T = Grade Scale: Participation ( 50 points) Team Number: Leader: ID: Member 1: ID: Member 2: ID:.

Task- Given the Table of Number of Athletes by National Olympic Commit.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

T has an exponential distibutin such that P-T2--2P-f-1-- What is farT-.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

Sweet, Inc had the following equity investment portfolio at January 1, 2025. During 2025, the following transactions took place. 1. On March 1. Rogers Company paid a $2 per share dividend. 2. On April 30, Sweet, Inc sold 320 shares of Chance Company for $11 per share. 3. On May 15. Sweet, inc, purchased 110 more shares of Evers Company stock at $15 per share. 4. At December 31, 2025, the stocks had the following price per share values: Evers $16 . Rogers $20 , and Chance $8 . During 2026, the following transactions took place: 5. On February 1. sweef. Inc sold the remaining Chance shares for $9 per share. 6. On March 1. Rogers Company paid a $2 per share dividend. 7. On December 21, Evers Company declared a cash dividend of $3 per share to be paid in the next month. 8. At December 31. 2026, the stocks had the following price per share values: Evers $18 and Rogers $22 . Sweet, Inc. had the following equity investment portfolio at January 1, 2025. During 2025, the following transactions took place. 1. On March 1. Rogers Company paid a $2 per share dividend. 2. On April 30. Sweet. Inc. sold 320 shares of Chance Company for $11 per share. 3. On May 15 . Sweet, Inc purchased 110 more shares of Evers Company stock at $15 per share. 4. At December 31, 2025, the stocks had the following price per share values: Evers $16 , Rogers $20 , and Chance $8 . During 2026, the following transactions took place. 5. On February 1 , sweet, inc sold the remaining Chance shares for $8 per share. 6. On March 1. Rogers Company paid a $2 per share dividend. 7. On December 21. Evers Company declared a cash dividend of $3 per share to be paid in the next month. 8. At December 31,2026 , the stocks had the following price per share values: Evers 518 and Rogars $22 . Prepare journal entries for each of the above transactions. (List all debit entries before credit entries. Credit occount titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter 0 for the amounts).

Sweet- Inc had the following equity investment portfolio at January 1-.pdf

SeanmxeHardacrea

More from SeanmxeHardacrea (20)