Where Next For
Teenage Parents?

      Judy Corlyon
  The Tavistock Institute


   University of Greenwich
        25th April 2012
The presentation

•   Teenage parents: who are they?
•   Problems they face
•   Policies – old and new – which affect them
•   Groundhog Day
How many pregnant
         young women?
Conceptions in England and Wales 2010

• 34,633 conceptions to under-18s
  49.9% led to abortions
• 6,674 conceptions to under 16s
  62.5% led to abortions
Who becomes pregnant?
Predominantly those who:
• Dislike school
  – Boring, repetitive, irrelevant, unsupportive
• Are unhappy and/or hard up
  – Family conflict/breakdown, violence, time in
    care
• Have limited expectations
  – parenthood preferable to school or low-paid
    job, unaware of alternatives
• Live where early parenthood is the norm
How many mothers?
Births in England and Wales 2010

• 22,842 to 18s and under
  610 within marriage or civil partnership
• 3,896 to 16s and under (1,047 under 16)
  38 within marriage or civil partnership

• Total: 723,165 births. Average age of
  mother having first child is 29-30
How many fathers?
• Even more invisible than young mothers in
  policy, practice and research
• Information only if included on birth registration +
  sparse. In 2010:
• 10,093 registered to parents both under 20
• But 16, 376 registered with mother under 20 and
  father 20-24
• Very similar to young mothers, but harder to
  engage and often ignored
Characteristics
Typically:
• No confidence, low self-esteem, high
  levels of insecurity and anxiety
• Desire for secure and loving relationships
• Baby as recipient and donor of love

• But not all have unhappy childhoods
• Or have accidental pregnancies
Risks
•   Education and employment
•   Health and well-being
•   Housing
•   Finance
•   Relationships
•   Parenting
Education and
              employment
• About 70% NEET
• In spite of sometimes good intentions:
  – Previous experience of education poor
  – Re-integration into school a problem
  – Specialist schooling provision patchy
  – Employment limited
  – Childcare unavailable/unaffordable/unsuitable
• Need flexibility
Care to Learn
• Help with the cost of childcare and associated
  travel for teenage parents to continue education
• Up to £160 a week (£175 in London boroughs)
  per child
• Paid direct to the childcare provider – must be
  registered with Ofsted
• But not Grandma – unless she’s registered with
  Ofsted, lives apart from the child and cares for
  other children
Health and Well-being
• Late take up of antenatal services
• Low birth-weight babies + prone to illness
• Incomplete immunisations
• More A&E visits with children
• Likely emotional and behavioural
  problems
• Mother’s depression ↔ tension,
  deprivation, social exclusion, lack of
  confidence
Housing
• With family or relatives
   – Support, but tensions, stress & overcrowding
• Hostels/ B&B (often for care leavers)
   – Unsuitable and lacking support
• Independent housing with support (recommended
  in Teenage Pregnancy Strategy)
   – Can be beneficial but regimented and no fathers
• LA or private housing
   – likely to be small, low-quality, unsafe & in poorer
     areas →isolation & loneliness
• Unlikely to lead to home-ownership later in life
Finances
•   Intergenerational poverty
•   Limited education → limited employment
•   Lack of knowledge re benefit entitlement
•   Difficulty negotiating the system
•   Reliance on family
•   Unused to budgeting
•   Financial skills of economic genius
    required
What does extra
            money mean ?

• ‘Having a bit of money means I can do
  something extra with them (the children) – go to
  a farm or go swimming – at the end of the week
  when the money (from benefits) has run out.’

• ‘It’s only £20 but it’s a day out for myself and my
  son. We don’t get treats otherwise.’
Poverty
2009-10:
• 2.6 million children living in poverty (BHC)
• 3.8 million (AHC)
• Significantly lower than when previous
  government took office –most notably for
  children in workless 1-parent families
• Mainly from increase in benefits(16%, £49 pw)
• But risk still remains higher for these children
• Parents’ employment / more education are ways
  out
Relationships
Supportive family and partner lead to better
  outcomes
But common for young parents are:
• Breakdown of partner relationship – no
  financial support and no contact for child
   ‘Sometimes I think I’ll need two prams…’
• Stressful family relationships pre-and post-
  pregnancy
• No support or parenting role models
Parenting
• ‘Good’ parenting according to Baumrind
              = Authoritative parenting
   Parents are demanding but also responsive
                         vs
a) Permissive: more responsive than demanding
b) Authoritarian: demanding, not responsive

• Parents with lower incomes tend to use
  authoritarian
• Positive results from targeted individual and
  group-based programmes for young parents
• But little rigorous evaluation
Horse or Cart?
• Growing realisation that disadvantage and social
  exclusion are a cause and a consequence of
  teenage pregnancy and parenthood
• Fatalistic acceptance of whatever …
• ‘I just look to the present and I just take the
  future as it comes, cos I find you just don’t know
  what to expect … What’s the point of planning
  your future? Just take the future as it comes,
  like.’ (Female)
• ‘If they get pregnant, they get pregnant – you
  know what I mean.’ (Male)
Not all negative
• Early parenthood can be positive – purpose to
  lives, catalyst for change, opportunity to defy
  negative stereotypes:

  ‘When I was leaving to go to the special school I
  said I would come back and she (teacher) said “I
  bet you won’t – they all say that and they don’t
  come back.” So I was determined, just to show
  her. And I got seven GCSEs and she was ever
  so nice to me after that.’
What helps
• Care to Learn and EMA
• Teenage pregnancy co-ordinators: in LAs to
  provide information, advice and support
• Sure Start Plus: launched 2001 through Teenage
  Pregnancy Strategy – targeted support for young
  mothers in 35 LAs with high rates of pregnancy
   – Positive links to health, well-being, money, housing,
     relationships, engagement with young fathers
• Family Nurse Partnerships: borrowed from US.
  Specialist nurses support young 1st-time mothers
   – Research indicates a real difference to life chances
     of most disadvantaged
New Government
Sarah Teather (Minister of State for Children and Families)
  March 2012, in joint ministerial message to LA teenage
  pregnancy co-ordinators:
  It is encouraging that local areas continue to include
  teenage parents in their efforts to improve support for
  vulnerable families through maternity and expanded
  health visitor services, children’s centres and Family
  Nurse Partnership. We know you help teenage parents
  re-engage with education or work-based learning, for
  example through the new bursary scheme and Care to
  Learn scheme of support with childcare costs.
What have they done?
Reduced public spending which affects:
• Sure Start Children’s Centres (some closing +
  payment by results)
• 76 LAs losing teenage pregnancy co-ordinator
• Care to Learn (under review -‘to ensure that
  support reaches those who most need it.’)
Focus now is on:
• Relationship support
• Improving parental skills – Pilot for free classes
  for parents of under-fives
• More free child care/early education (15 hours)
Welfare
2010 June Budget & October Spending Review:
Freeze in Child Benefit, reductions in Housing
  Benefit, changes to Working Tax Credit
Instead: Universal Credit – reduces rate at which
  benefits withdrawn as earnings increase
Parents with youngest child aged 5 move from
  income support to JSA.
Estimated 300,000 more children in poverty
 by 2013-14
Child Poverty
Child Poverty Strategy 2011 aim:
To reduce the risk of transmitted deprivation
‘About far more than income’ → ancillary indicators
Large increases in benefits and tax credits gone
Focus on:
• promoting employment
• improving early childhood development
• reducing gap in educational attainment
What does poverty
     (not) mean for children?
• 1 week’s holiday a year away from home with
  the family
• Swimming at least once a month
• A hobby or leisure activity
• Friends round for tea or a snack once a fortnight
• Not sharing a bedroom with a sibling of the
  opposite sex if 10+
• Leisure equipment (e.g. sports equipment or
  bicycle)
• Celebrations on special occasions such as
  birthdays, Christmas or other religious festivals
What does it (not)
         mean for parents?
• Home adequately warm and in decent state of
  repair
• Yearly 1-week holiday away, not with relatives
• Replacing worn out furniture & electrical goods
• A small amount of money to spend on self
• Regular savings (of £10 a month) for rainy days
  or retirement
• Friends or family for a drink/meal once a month
• Home contents insurance
• A hobby or leisure activity
What does it mean
          for parenting?
• Poor parents ≠ poor parenting but does = stress
• Materially disadvantaged parents face more
  stress than affluent parents
• It causes them to be depressed and irritable
• This affects their parenting and they are more
  likely to be harsh and inconsistent
• Typically has negative effect on outcomes for
  children
Stress
• Waylen and Stewart Brown (2008): study of
  parents of young children in different social and
  cultural groups
• Cumulative ill-effect on parenting of poor health,
  lack of social support and financial hardship
• Deterioration in finances led to reduction in
  parenting score
• But more money alone was not the answer

• Most influential was improvement in mother’s
  mental and physical health
Environment
• Moving to a near-poor/non-poor area improved
  mothers’ mental health + children less
  depressed and anxious (Leventhal and Brooks-Gunn
  2003: US)


• UK study in 4 neighbourhoods (3 deprived):
  In deprived areas – mothers with stress, children
  with behavioural problems
  In affluent area – less stress, more progressive
  parental views (Barnes 2007: UK)
Environment
• …parenting in poor environments is a more risky
  business than parenting elsewhere. (Ghate and
  Hazel 2002)


• But effect on outcomes is not significant:
  parents’ background, child’s personality and
  family dynamics are more important
Culture of Poverty
• Ermisch et al (2001): growing up in poor families
  points to lower educational expectations, less
  likelihood of employment and propensity for
  early motherhood

• Yaqub (2002): people’s class, education and
  health are similar to their parents’. But these can
  be counteracted (e.g. by resilience)
Culture of Poverty
• Now a derogatory term – that poor people have
  a different culture from the middle classes:
  –   low educational expectations for their children
  –   replication of their own (harsh) parenting experiences
  –   no regard for individual attainment
  –   no commitment to the labour force
• Thus inter-generational poverty creates barriers
  to upward mobility

• Is changing attitudes/parenting styles the
  answer?
• Or do affluent parents use their advantages to
  ensure power and privilege for their children?
1972
Sir Keith Joseph, then Secretary of State for
Social Services, drew attention to the fact that in
Britain since the Second World War there had
been a conspicuous persistence of deprivation
and maladjustment. It seemed to him that social
problems tended to recur in successive
generations of the same families – to form a
cycle of deprivation. Subsequently the DHSS,
through the SSRC, made available a sum of
money for a programme of research into the
whole problem. (Cover for book on transmitted
deprivation, publ 1983)
1998
… there is huge scope for many, if not most,
individuals to escape from the patterns and
tendencies (of transmitted deprivation). An
important area for further research is to examine
more closely the characteristics of individuals
who escape… (Hobcraft)
And finally

Sarah Teather, March 2012


This Government remains committed to
reducing rates of teenage pregnancy still
further and improving outcomes for young
parents and their children. This is central to
our aim to reduce inter-generational poverty
and inequalities.
Contact

       Judy Corlyon
     Tavistock Insitute
j.corlyon@tavinstitute.org
   www.tavinstitute.org

Teenage parents

  • 1.
    Where Next For TeenageParents? Judy Corlyon The Tavistock Institute University of Greenwich 25th April 2012
  • 2.
    The presentation • Teenage parents: who are they? • Problems they face • Policies – old and new – which affect them • Groundhog Day
  • 3.
    How many pregnant young women? Conceptions in England and Wales 2010 • 34,633 conceptions to under-18s 49.9% led to abortions • 6,674 conceptions to under 16s 62.5% led to abortions
  • 4.
    Who becomes pregnant? Predominantlythose who: • Dislike school – Boring, repetitive, irrelevant, unsupportive • Are unhappy and/or hard up – Family conflict/breakdown, violence, time in care • Have limited expectations – parenthood preferable to school or low-paid job, unaware of alternatives • Live where early parenthood is the norm
  • 5.
    How many mothers? Birthsin England and Wales 2010 • 22,842 to 18s and under 610 within marriage or civil partnership • 3,896 to 16s and under (1,047 under 16) 38 within marriage or civil partnership • Total: 723,165 births. Average age of mother having first child is 29-30
  • 6.
    How many fathers? •Even more invisible than young mothers in policy, practice and research • Information only if included on birth registration + sparse. In 2010: • 10,093 registered to parents both under 20 • But 16, 376 registered with mother under 20 and father 20-24 • Very similar to young mothers, but harder to engage and often ignored
  • 7.
    Characteristics Typically: • No confidence,low self-esteem, high levels of insecurity and anxiety • Desire for secure and loving relationships • Baby as recipient and donor of love • But not all have unhappy childhoods • Or have accidental pregnancies
  • 8.
    Risks • Education and employment • Health and well-being • Housing • Finance • Relationships • Parenting
  • 9.
    Education and employment • About 70% NEET • In spite of sometimes good intentions: – Previous experience of education poor – Re-integration into school a problem – Specialist schooling provision patchy – Employment limited – Childcare unavailable/unaffordable/unsuitable • Need flexibility
  • 10.
    Care to Learn •Help with the cost of childcare and associated travel for teenage parents to continue education • Up to £160 a week (£175 in London boroughs) per child • Paid direct to the childcare provider – must be registered with Ofsted • But not Grandma – unless she’s registered with Ofsted, lives apart from the child and cares for other children
  • 11.
    Health and Well-being •Late take up of antenatal services • Low birth-weight babies + prone to illness • Incomplete immunisations • More A&E visits with children • Likely emotional and behavioural problems • Mother’s depression ↔ tension, deprivation, social exclusion, lack of confidence
  • 12.
    Housing • With familyor relatives – Support, but tensions, stress & overcrowding • Hostels/ B&B (often for care leavers) – Unsuitable and lacking support • Independent housing with support (recommended in Teenage Pregnancy Strategy) – Can be beneficial but regimented and no fathers • LA or private housing – likely to be small, low-quality, unsafe & in poorer areas →isolation & loneliness • Unlikely to lead to home-ownership later in life
  • 13.
    Finances • Intergenerational poverty • Limited education → limited employment • Lack of knowledge re benefit entitlement • Difficulty negotiating the system • Reliance on family • Unused to budgeting • Financial skills of economic genius required
  • 14.
    What does extra money mean ? • ‘Having a bit of money means I can do something extra with them (the children) – go to a farm or go swimming – at the end of the week when the money (from benefits) has run out.’ • ‘It’s only £20 but it’s a day out for myself and my son. We don’t get treats otherwise.’
  • 15.
    Poverty 2009-10: • 2.6 millionchildren living in poverty (BHC) • 3.8 million (AHC) • Significantly lower than when previous government took office –most notably for children in workless 1-parent families • Mainly from increase in benefits(16%, £49 pw) • But risk still remains higher for these children • Parents’ employment / more education are ways out
  • 16.
    Relationships Supportive family andpartner lead to better outcomes But common for young parents are: • Breakdown of partner relationship – no financial support and no contact for child ‘Sometimes I think I’ll need two prams…’ • Stressful family relationships pre-and post- pregnancy • No support or parenting role models
  • 17.
    Parenting • ‘Good’ parentingaccording to Baumrind = Authoritative parenting Parents are demanding but also responsive vs a) Permissive: more responsive than demanding b) Authoritarian: demanding, not responsive • Parents with lower incomes tend to use authoritarian • Positive results from targeted individual and group-based programmes for young parents • But little rigorous evaluation
  • 18.
    Horse or Cart? •Growing realisation that disadvantage and social exclusion are a cause and a consequence of teenage pregnancy and parenthood • Fatalistic acceptance of whatever … • ‘I just look to the present and I just take the future as it comes, cos I find you just don’t know what to expect … What’s the point of planning your future? Just take the future as it comes, like.’ (Female) • ‘If they get pregnant, they get pregnant – you know what I mean.’ (Male)
  • 19.
    Not all negative •Early parenthood can be positive – purpose to lives, catalyst for change, opportunity to defy negative stereotypes: ‘When I was leaving to go to the special school I said I would come back and she (teacher) said “I bet you won’t – they all say that and they don’t come back.” So I was determined, just to show her. And I got seven GCSEs and she was ever so nice to me after that.’
  • 20.
    What helps • Careto Learn and EMA • Teenage pregnancy co-ordinators: in LAs to provide information, advice and support • Sure Start Plus: launched 2001 through Teenage Pregnancy Strategy – targeted support for young mothers in 35 LAs with high rates of pregnancy – Positive links to health, well-being, money, housing, relationships, engagement with young fathers • Family Nurse Partnerships: borrowed from US. Specialist nurses support young 1st-time mothers – Research indicates a real difference to life chances of most disadvantaged
  • 21.
    New Government Sarah Teather(Minister of State for Children and Families) March 2012, in joint ministerial message to LA teenage pregnancy co-ordinators: It is encouraging that local areas continue to include teenage parents in their efforts to improve support for vulnerable families through maternity and expanded health visitor services, children’s centres and Family Nurse Partnership. We know you help teenage parents re-engage with education or work-based learning, for example through the new bursary scheme and Care to Learn scheme of support with childcare costs.
  • 22.
    What have theydone? Reduced public spending which affects: • Sure Start Children’s Centres (some closing + payment by results) • 76 LAs losing teenage pregnancy co-ordinator • Care to Learn (under review -‘to ensure that support reaches those who most need it.’) Focus now is on: • Relationship support • Improving parental skills – Pilot for free classes for parents of under-fives • More free child care/early education (15 hours)
  • 23.
    Welfare 2010 June Budget& October Spending Review: Freeze in Child Benefit, reductions in Housing Benefit, changes to Working Tax Credit Instead: Universal Credit – reduces rate at which benefits withdrawn as earnings increase Parents with youngest child aged 5 move from income support to JSA. Estimated 300,000 more children in poverty by 2013-14
  • 24.
    Child Poverty Child PovertyStrategy 2011 aim: To reduce the risk of transmitted deprivation ‘About far more than income’ → ancillary indicators Large increases in benefits and tax credits gone Focus on: • promoting employment • improving early childhood development • reducing gap in educational attainment
  • 25.
    What does poverty (not) mean for children? • 1 week’s holiday a year away from home with the family • Swimming at least once a month • A hobby or leisure activity • Friends round for tea or a snack once a fortnight • Not sharing a bedroom with a sibling of the opposite sex if 10+ • Leisure equipment (e.g. sports equipment or bicycle) • Celebrations on special occasions such as birthdays, Christmas or other religious festivals
  • 26.
    What does it(not) mean for parents? • Home adequately warm and in decent state of repair • Yearly 1-week holiday away, not with relatives • Replacing worn out furniture & electrical goods • A small amount of money to spend on self • Regular savings (of £10 a month) for rainy days or retirement • Friends or family for a drink/meal once a month • Home contents insurance • A hobby or leisure activity
  • 27.
    What does itmean for parenting? • Poor parents ≠ poor parenting but does = stress • Materially disadvantaged parents face more stress than affluent parents • It causes them to be depressed and irritable • This affects their parenting and they are more likely to be harsh and inconsistent • Typically has negative effect on outcomes for children
  • 28.
    Stress • Waylen andStewart Brown (2008): study of parents of young children in different social and cultural groups • Cumulative ill-effect on parenting of poor health, lack of social support and financial hardship • Deterioration in finances led to reduction in parenting score • But more money alone was not the answer • Most influential was improvement in mother’s mental and physical health
  • 29.
    Environment • Moving toa near-poor/non-poor area improved mothers’ mental health + children less depressed and anxious (Leventhal and Brooks-Gunn 2003: US) • UK study in 4 neighbourhoods (3 deprived): In deprived areas – mothers with stress, children with behavioural problems In affluent area – less stress, more progressive parental views (Barnes 2007: UK)
  • 30.
    Environment • …parenting inpoor environments is a more risky business than parenting elsewhere. (Ghate and Hazel 2002) • But effect on outcomes is not significant: parents’ background, child’s personality and family dynamics are more important
  • 31.
    Culture of Poverty •Ermisch et al (2001): growing up in poor families points to lower educational expectations, less likelihood of employment and propensity for early motherhood • Yaqub (2002): people’s class, education and health are similar to their parents’. But these can be counteracted (e.g. by resilience)
  • 32.
    Culture of Poverty •Now a derogatory term – that poor people have a different culture from the middle classes: – low educational expectations for their children – replication of their own (harsh) parenting experiences – no regard for individual attainment – no commitment to the labour force • Thus inter-generational poverty creates barriers to upward mobility • Is changing attitudes/parenting styles the answer? • Or do affluent parents use their advantages to ensure power and privilege for their children?
  • 33.
    1972 Sir Keith Joseph,then Secretary of State for Social Services, drew attention to the fact that in Britain since the Second World War there had been a conspicuous persistence of deprivation and maladjustment. It seemed to him that social problems tended to recur in successive generations of the same families – to form a cycle of deprivation. Subsequently the DHSS, through the SSRC, made available a sum of money for a programme of research into the whole problem. (Cover for book on transmitted deprivation, publ 1983)
  • 34.
    1998 … there ishuge scope for many, if not most, individuals to escape from the patterns and tendencies (of transmitted deprivation). An important area for further research is to examine more closely the characteristics of individuals who escape… (Hobcraft)
  • 35.
    And finally Sarah Teather,March 2012 This Government remains committed to reducing rates of teenage pregnancy still further and improving outcomes for young parents and their children. This is central to our aim to reduce inter-generational poverty and inequalities.
  • 36.
    Contact Judy Corlyon Tavistock Insitute j.corlyon@tavinstitute.org www.tavinstitute.org