Vancouver and Red Dog Site Visit
September 18-20, 2017
Update
September 19, 2017
Don Lindsay, President and Chief Executive Officer
Update
Forward Looking Information
Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in other provinces
(collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause
the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to expected timing of first oil from the Fort Hills project, amount and timing of
dividends and dividend sustainability, and the potential for payment of base and supplemental dividends to be paid in the future, coal EBITDA and free cash flow
potential, and 2017 coal production, cost, stripping and sustaining capital guidance.
These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in Teck’s public
filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and accompanying oral
presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, general business and economic conditions, the supply and demand for, deliveries of, and
the level and volatility of prices of, zinc, copper and coal and other primary metals and minerals as well as oil, and related products, the timing of the receipt of regulatory
and governmental approvals for our development projects and other operations, our costs of production and production and productivity levels, as well as those of our
competitors, power prices, continuing availability of water and power resources for our operations, market competition, the accuracy of our reserve estimates (including
with respect to size, grade and recoverability) and the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, conditions in financial markets, the future
financial performance of the company, our ability to attract and retain skilled staff, our ability to procure equipment and operating supplies, positive results from the
studies on our expansion projects, our coal and other product inventories, our ability to secure adequate transportation for our products, our ability to obtain permits for
our operations and expansions, our ongoing relations with our employees and business partners and joint venturers. Our coal EBITDA and free cash flow potential are
also based on assumptions included on the slide titled "Significant Earnings Potential". Assumptions regarding Fort Hills also include the assumption that project
development and funding proceed as planned, assumptions of costs as set out in the sanction decision as well as assumptions noted on the relevant slides discussing
Fort Hills. Payment of dividends is in the discretion of the board of directors. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive.
Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, changes in commodity and power prices, changes in market demand for our
products, changes in interest and currency exchange rates, acts of foreign governments and the outcome of legal proceedings, inaccurate geological and metallurgical
assumptions (including with respect to the size, grade and recoverability of mineral reserves and resources), unanticipated operational difficulties (including failure of
plant, equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations, cost escalation, unavailability of materials and equipment, government action
or delays in the receipt of government approvals, industrial disturbances or other job action, adverse weather conditions and unanticipated events related to health, safety
and environmental matters), union labour disputes, political risk, social unrest, failure of customers or counterparties to perform their contractual obligations, changes in
our credit ratings or the financial market in general, unanticipated increases in costs to construct our development projects, difficulty in obtaining permits or securing
transportation for our products, inability to address concerns regarding permits of environmental impact assessments, changes in tax benefits or tax rates, resolution of
environmental and other proceedings or disputes, and changes or deterioration in general economic conditions. Our Fort Hills project is not controlled by us and
construction and production schedules may be adjusted by our partners.
Statements concerning future production costs or volumes are based on numerous assumptions of management regarding operating matters and on assumptions that
demand for products develops as anticipated, that customers and other counterparties perform their contractual obligations, that operating and capital plans will not be
disrupted by issues such as mechanical failure, unavailability of parts and supplies, labour disturbances, interruption in transportation or utilities, adverse weather
conditions, and that there are no material unanticipated variations in the cost of energy or supplies.
We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions, risks and
uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as well as subsequent filings
of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov).
2
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
US$/tonne
HCC Spot Price Hypothetical HCC spot price excl. cyclone impacts??
Update
Underlying Coal Price Volatility Appears More Muted
Q4 2016 Spike
• Fear of cyclone
April 2017 Spike
• Cyclone hits
Coal Price Assessment
Source: Argus
Lower apparent volatility excluding cyclone impacts
Plotted to September 11, 2017
3
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Q12010
Q22010
Q32010
Q42010
Q12011
Q22011
Q32011
Q42011
Q12012
Q22012
Q32012
Q42012
Q12013
Q22013
Q32013
Q42013
Q12014
Q22014
Q32014
Q42014
Q12015
Q22015
Q32015
Q42015
Q12016
Q22016
Q32016
Q42016
Q12017
Q22017
Q32017
US$/tonne
Teck Realized Price (lhs)
Quarterly Contract (lhs)
Teck Realized Price Relative to Contract (rhs)
Sales Mix
• 60% Shorter than quarterly pricing
mechanisms (incl. “spot”)
• 40% Quarterly contract price
‒ Index-linked pricing mechanism for
premium steelmaking coal contracts from
April 1, 2017
‒ Majority based on average of key spot
price assessments, on a trailing 3-month
basis with a one month lag
Average Realized Prices
• Relativity to quarterly contract prices a function
of product mix and timing of sales
‒ Product mix weighted to hard coking coal
Historical Average Realized Prices
vs. Quarterly Contract Prices1
Update
Average Realized Steelmaking Coal Prices
Averaged 94% 2014-2016
Average realized prices expected to remain similar to historical relationship
with quarterly contract prices, in stable market conditions
1. Compares Teck’s average realized price to the negotiated quarterly benchmark prior to April 1, 2017, and to the index-linked quarterly contract price afterwards. The average realized
price for Q3 2017 is based on the mid point of guidance.
4
1. Please refer to Teck and China Investment Corporation’s press releases dated September 5, 2017 for further details..
Update
CIC Remains a Supportive Long-Term Partner
5
• July 2009: Acquires 101.3 million shares at ~C$17.21/share for ~C$1.7 billion
• September 2017: Divests 42 million shares at ~C$28.97/share for ~C$1.2
billion on a “Bought Block Trade” basis, through J.P. Morgan
• Currently: Holds 59.3 million shares, for 10.4% economic interest
‒ Intends to continue to hold these shares as a long-term financial investor
‒ Views fundamentals of the company as sound, and remains supportive of
its strategic direction and its management
Relationship unchanged; ongoing close relationship
As at June 30, 2017.
Source: Fort Hills Energy Limited Partnership, May 2017.
Update
Fort Hills First Oil Expected End of 2017
• Construction >92% complete
• 4 of 6 areas turned over to Operations
‒ Utilities >95% complete
‒ Secondary Extraction first oil facilities
81% complete
• >90% operations personnel hired
• First froth production in September to
advance the commissioning process and
de-risk the project
6
Update
Returning Cash to Shareholders
• Increased the dividend
‒ Annualized dividend of $0.20/share
‒ Payment quarterly
• Shift in dividend policy to align with
cyclical nature of our business
‒ Variable component, at the Board’s
discretion
7
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175
C$Million
HCC Coal Price US$/t
Update
Significant Earnings Potential
Coal EBITDA & Free Cash Flow Potential*
* Non-GAAP financial measures. See ‘Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures’ in our quarterly results news releases for additional information. Annualized EBITDA and free cash flow generating capacity of
the coal business unit in two scenarios. The “mid-point” scenario assumes the mid-points of 2017 production and cost guidance, and realized coal prices equal to 92% of benchmark. The “Upside” scenario
assumes production at the high end of our 2017 guidance range, operating costs at the low end of the range, and realized coal prices equal to 96% of the benchmark. “Cash flow” refers to free cash flow
after capitalized stripping and sustaining capital. Outputs are based on an assumed Canadian dollar to US dollar exchange rate of 1.26, 2017 plan fuel costs, and numerous other assumptions. These
assumptions are subject to various risks and uncertainties that may cause results to vary materially from those depicted above. Please see the Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Information for more
information.
2017 Guidance Mid-Point Upside
Coal Production (Mt) 27.25 27.5
Unit Cost of Sales (C$/t):
Site 51 49
Transportation 36 35
Unit Cost of Sales (C$/t) 87 84
Capitalized Stripping (C$M) 430 430
Sustaining Capital (C$M) 140 140
8
Update
Summary
• Generating strong free cash flow
• Benefiting from the right commodity
mix at the right time
• Three months to first oil at Fort Hills
• Solid financial position
• High quality organic growth options
9
Zinc Business
September 19, 2017
Dale Andres, Senior Vice President, Base Metals
Zinc Business
Forward Looking Information
Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in
other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include management’s expectations that
Teck’s zinc business has excellent growth and extension opportunities, mineral resource and mine life estimates, Red Dog 2017 guidance, projected Red
Dog throughput and zinc grade, projection that the Red Dog VIP2 Project will increase mill throughput by approximately 15%, potential for mine life
extension at Antamina, expectations of continuous improvement at Trail, the potential for future zinc development, including but not limited to regarding
the Teena and San Nicolas properties, the expectations regarding potential life extension options and world-class new mine opportunities.
These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in
Teck’s public filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and
accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, general business and economic conditions,
assumptions regarding the receipt of regulatory and governmental approvals for our development projects and other operations, the accuracy of our
resources estimates and the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, conditions in financial markets, the future financial
performance of the company, assumption that the VIP2 Project operates as anticipated, positive results from the studies on our expansion projects, our
ongoing relations with our employees and business partners and joint venturers. Reserve and resource life estimates assume the mine life of longest
lived resource in the relevant commodity is achieved, assumes production at planned rates and in some cases development of as yet undeveloped
projects. Management’s expectations of mine life are based on the current planned production rates and assume that all resources described in this
presentation are developed. Certain forward-looking statements are based on assumptions disclosed in footnotes to the relevant slides. The foregoing list
of assumptions is not exhaustive.
Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions (including with
respect to the size, grade and recoverability of mineral reserves and resources), unanticipated operational or development difficulties union labour
disputes, political risk, social unrest, changes in our credit ratings or the financial market in general, unanticipated increases in costs to construct our
development projects, difficulty in obtaining permits, inability to address concerns regarding permits of environmental impact assessments, changes in
tax benefits or tax rates, and changes or deterioration in general economic conditions. We will not achieve the maximum mine lives of our projects, or be
able to mine all reserves at our projects, or develop our projects, if we do not obtain relevant permits for our operations.
We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions,
risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as
well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and
on EDGAR (www.sec.gov).
The Red Dog and Antamina scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Rodrigo Marinho,
P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101.
2
Zinc Business
Attractive Zinc Business
• World’s largest net zinc miner
– World’s second largest zinc mine at Red Dog
– Rising zinc production at Antamina
• Efficient, integrated smelting operation at Trail
– Increasing production and stability
• Excellent growth and extension opportunities
– Mill throughput increases
– Exploration and new development projects
3
Zinc Business
Safety is a Core Value
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD
Frequency(per200,000hoursworked)
High Potential Incident Frequency Our Key Focus Areas
1. High Potential Risk Control
2. Occupational Health & Hygiene
3. Courageous Safety Leadership
Significant Improvement
High Potential Incidents: 45% reduction
Lost Time Injuries: 15% reduction
4
Zinc Business
World’s Largest Net Zinc Miner
583
198
0
250
500
750
ZincProduction(kt)
2
Red Dog1
Reserve Mine Life to 2031
Reserves: 51 Mt
Resources: Indicated 6 Mt
Inferred 26 Mt
Antamina1
Reserve Mine Life to 2028
Reserves: 247 Mt
Resources: Measured 19 Mt
Indicated 138 Mt
Inferred 431 Mt
Top 10 Zinc Mines by Production (2016)
Source: Wood Mackenzie
1. Mineral Reserves and Resources as at December 31, 2016, as disclosed in our latest Annual Information Form available on SEDAR.
2. Our 22.5% share of Antamina zinc production was 45 kt.
5
Zinc Business
Very Competitive Cost Position
Low cost zinc production…
By-product credits significantly reduce unit costs
-
0.20
0.40
0.60
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
UnitCosts(US$/lb)
…with significant quarterly variation at
Red Dog1
1. Average quarterly unit cost (2013-2017) before royalties, based on Teck ‘s reported financials.
• Seasonality of unit costs largely due to lead sales during the shipping season
• Zinc is a by-product credit at Antamina and accounted for in the Copper Business Unit
6
Zinc Business
Stable Operating Costs at Red Dog
• Low total cash costs, at
US$0.45/lb in 2016
• C1 cash costs down
US$0.09/lb in 2016 vs. 2015
‒ Operating cost reductions
‒ Treatment charges lower
‒ Higher lead price
• Royalty costs are up as a
function of higher zinc prices
‒ NANA royalty to 35% in
October 2017
$0.00
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
Operating
Costs
Transportation
Costs
Treatment
Charges
By-Product
Credits
C1 Cash
Costs
Royalty Total Cash
Costs
2016
0.45
0.19
0.09
0.20
0.22
0.19
0.26
Based on Teck’s reported financials.
$0.00
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
Operating
Costs
Transportation
Costs
Treatment
Charges
By-Product
Credits
C1 Cash
Costs
Royalty Total Cash
Costs
2015
0.21
0.10
0.23
0.19
0.47
0.35
0.12
US$/lb
US$/lb
7
Zinc Business
Red Dog is a Consistent Performer
• 2017 guidance updated to 525-550 kt zinc
metal contained in concentrate
− Mine sequencing changes at Aqqaluk
− Additional feed of higher grade but
complex Qanaiyaq ore
• Improvement and extension projects
− VIP2 Project to increase mill
throughput by ~15%
− Drilling program at Aktigiruq
5
10
15
20
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-
2020
2
3
4
5
Grade(%)
Throughput(Mt)
Throughput to Help
Offset Grade Decline
Throughput Zinc Grade
8
Tailings & Water Management
- Staged tailings dam construction
- Major focus on water
management and treatment
Qanaiyaq
- Started production in 2017
- Optimizing blend strategy
VIP2
- Increase mill throughput
- Maintain mine life
- Lower cost structure
Mine Life Extension
- Near term – Road access & drilling
- Longer term - Underground
development and new tailings facility
Zinc Business
Preparing Red Dog for the Future
9
Zinc Business
Rising Zinc Production at Antamina
• Large zinc production increase
− >50% in 2017 vs. the last 5 years
− Quarterly zinc production profile varies
based on mine sequencing
• Mine life extension studies progressing
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-
2020
Production(kt)
Copper & Zinc Production
Zinc Copper
Guidance numbers are based on the mid-point of production guidance. Production numbers reflect Teck’s 22.5% share.
-
5
10
15
20
25
Q1-13
Q2-13
Q3-13
Q4-13
Q1-14
Q2-14
Q3-14
Q4-14
Q1-15
Q2-15
Q3-15
Q4-15
Q1-16
Q2-16
Q3-16
Q4-16
Q1-17
Q2-17
Production(kt)
Quarterly Zinc Production
10
•High quality, local source of concentrate for Trail Operations
•Significant focus on drilling programs
− Improved feed grades in 2017
− Additional drilling underway to improve 2018 mine plan confidence
Zinc Business
Successful Drilling at Pend Oreille
11
Zinc Business
Driving Continuous Improvement at Trail
• Annual production records set in 2016
− Zinc: 312 kt
− Lead: 99 kt
− Silver: 24 Moz
• Red Dog is an important long term feed
source
• Investing in second new acid plant
− Improved reliability and stability
• Margin improvement programs:
− Focus on cost management
− Improve efficiency
− Introduce value-added products
80
90
100
110
120
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
%Comparedwith2012Base
Solid Production Performance
Zinc Lead
Guidance numbers are based on the mid-point of our production guidance ranges.12
Zinc Business
Innovation a Core Driver of Long-Term Value
Manage Improve Grow
• Mine-to-mill initiatives
including stockpile blending
• Blast movement monitoring
• Sensor-based ore sorting at
Red Dog
• VIP2 Project
• Exploration and
underground development
Broad portfolio of existing, emerging & future technologies
13
Zinc Business
Our Sustainability Strategy
Community Water Our People Biodiversity Energy and
Climate Change
Air
Community
- Northwest Arctic Borough PILT Agreement at Red Dog
Water
- Trail groundwater treatment plant
- Optimizing water discharge at Red Dog
Air
- Fugitive dust emission reductions at new Trail smelter recycle building
14
Zinc Business
Significant Undeveloped Resource
In Construction
Pre-Sanction
Medium-Term
Growth Options
Red Dog
Satellite Deposits
Cirque
Trail #2 Acid Plant
Red Dog VIP2
Teena
San Nicolás (Cu-Zn)
Antamina Brownfield
Future Options
1. Rox Resources, June 1, 2016 PR Inferred Mineral Resource estimate in accordance to requirements and guidelines of the JORC code.
Lens Tonnes
(Mt)
Zn
(%)
Pb
(%)
Zn+Pb
(%)
Main 45 12.0 1.8 13.7
Lower 14 8.2 1.2 9.4
Total1 58 11.1 1.6 12.7
• Exploring to test continuity and resource
limits, and preliminary development studies
15
Zinc Business
Near Term Development Potential
In Construction
Pre-Sanction
Medium-Term
Growth Options
Red Dog
Satellite Deposits
Cirque
Trail #2 Acid Plant
Red Dog VIP2
Teena
San Nicolás (Cu-Zn)
Antamina Brownfield
Future Options
Francisco I.
Madero
Fresnillo
SAN NICOLAS
La Negra
Cozamin
Santa Barbara
Platosa
Penasquito
Tayahua
Charcas
Bilbao
Real de Angeles
Pitarrilla
Velardena
Del Toro
Nuestra Senora
Torreon
San Luis
Potosi
Zn/Pb mine
Zn mine
Zn/Pb project
Pb/Zn smelter
Gulf of
Mexico
0 250km
500 km
Cu/Zn project
Resources1 Tonnes
(Mt)
Zn
(%)
Cu
(%)
Indicated 92 1.7 1.2
Inferred 11 1.0 1.2
• High grade, low C1 cost Cu-Zn mine
• Competitive capital cost
• EIA and permit submission for Q1 2019
• Top 10 zinc producer in early years
1. Mineral Reserves and Resources as at December 31, 2016, as disclosed in our latest Annual Information Form available on SEDAR.16
Zinc Business
Increasing Value in the Zinc Business
• Low cost zinc production
• Driving results through operating excellence
• Targeted improvements to enhance value
• Life extension options at core assets
• World-class new mine opportunities
17
Zinc Market
September 19, 2017
Andrew Stonkus, Senior Vice President, Marketing and Logistics
Zinc Market
Forward Looking Information
Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario)
and comparable legislation in other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be
materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include statements relating to a projected zinc deficit, zinc inventory and pricing projections, smelter production
and capacity projections, potential expansion of the zinc market and consistency and reliability of Red Dog concentrate.
These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially. The
forward-looking statements in these slides and accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions including, but not limited to,
assumptions about zinc production, zinc use, smelter production and capacity, general business and economic conditions, the accuracy of
our Red Dog reserve estimates and geological results and the future performance of Red Dog. The foregoing list of assumptions is not
exhaustive.
Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, changes in commodity and power prices, changes in
market demand for zinc, acts of foreign governments, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions, inaccurate zinc market
assumptions, unanticipated operational difficulties, and changes or deterioration in general economic conditions.
We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning
assumptions, risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent
Annual Information Form, as well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under
our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov).
2
Zinc Market
Producing Concentrates and Custom Zinc Metal
Zinc in concentrate Tailor-made zinc jumbos with galvanized sheet steel
3
(1,500)
(1,000)
(500)
0
500
1,000
1,500
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Others China Change
Antamina Glencore
India Dugald River
Namibia/S.A.
thousandtonnescontained
Source: Teck
Mine Production Growth
Insufficient to Balance Market
Imported Spot TCs at Historical Lows
0
50
100
150
200
250
Jan-10
Jul-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
Jan-12
Jul-12
Jan-13
Jul-13
Jan-14
Jul-14
Jan-15
Jul-15
Jan-16
Jul-16
Jan-17
Jul-17
ImportedTC,$/dmt
Source: Teck , CNIA, Wood Mac, NBS
Projected Deficit
Zinc Market
Zinc Concentrate Deficit Since 2015
4
Zinc Market
Planned Projects Won’t Meet Long-Term Demand
8
10
12
14
16
18
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Mt
Secondary (Net of Smelter Losses)
Mine Production
Base Demand Teck
Zinc Mine Production Peaks in 2020
Existing and Fully Committed Mines
Demand Scenarios
• Low Growth (2.3%): 4.3 Mt of uncommitted projects needed by 2025
• High Growth (3.0%): 5.2 Mt of uncommitted projects needed by 2025
Source: Teck, Wood Mackenzie
0
1
2
3
4
5
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Mehdiabad Ozernoe Kipushi
Selwyn Tala Hamza Citronen
Pavlovskoye Dairi Shalkiya Restart
Aripuana Buenavista Korbalikhinsky
Woodlawn Asmara Other Small <50kmt
Uncommitted Projects Insufficient
Mt
5
Monthly Chinese Mined Zinc Production
Zinc Market
Chinese Mined Zinc Production at 5-Year Low
Source: CNIA
Down 11% m/m in July 2017 & down 6% y/y YTD
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Jan-06
Jun-06
Nov-06
Apr-07
Sep-07
Feb-08
Jul-08
Dec-08
May-09
Oct-09
Mar-10
Aug-10
Jan-11
Jun-11
Nov-11
Apr-12
Sep-12
Feb-13
Jul-13
Dec-13
May-14
Oct-14
Mar-15
Aug-15
Jan-16
Jun-16
Nov-16
Apr-17
ThousandsDMT
Plotted to
July 2017
6
Environmental/Safety Inspections
Constraining Zinc Mine Production
Source: Antaike, BGRIMM, Teck
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
kt
Jan-May 2013 Jan-May 2014
Jan-May 2015 Jan-May 2016
Jan-May 2017
Estimated Mine Growth Rarely Achieved
Zinc Market
Limited Chinese Response to Higher Prices
Source: CNIA/NBS
100
350
270
180
300
360
200
-630
60
150
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
kt
Early-year estimate Year end estimate
7
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Jan-13
Mar-13
May-13
Jul-13
Sep-13
Nov-13
Jan-14
Mar-14
May-14
Jul-14
Sep-14
Nov-14
Jan-15
Mar-15
May-15
Jul-15
Sep-15
Nov-15
Jan-16
Mar-16
May-16
Jul-16
Sep-16
Nov-16
Jan-17
Mar-17
May-17
Jul-17
Source: China Customs
ZinccontainedthouMt
• Massive destocking in 2016
• Year-to-date to June 2017, stocks risen 35%
• Concentrate inventories currently at historic lows
Chinese Zinc Concentrate Imports
Zinc Market
Chinese Concentrate Imports Below Previous Highs
8
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
Jan-13
Mar-13
May-13
Jul-13
Sep-13
Nov-13
Jan-14
Mar-14
May-14
Jul-14
Sep-14
Nov-14
Jan-15
Mar-15
May-15
Jul-15
Sep-15
Nov-15
Jan-16
Mar-16
May-16
Jul-16
Sep-16
Nov-16
Jan-17
Mar-17
May-17
Jul-17
ZinccontainedthouMt
Source: NBS/CNIA
• Down 2% y/y YTD July – Down 6% MoM
• Cuts to Chinese refined production March-June (~100-170 kmt)
• Improvement in spot TCs has improved Chinese smelter profitability
• Expect concentrate stock draw down as winter inventory not built
Chinese Smelter Production
Zinc Market
Chinese Smelter Production Constrained
9
Zinc Market
Chinese Zinc Smelter Cut in 1H 2017
Source: SMM
Smelter Utilization Rates Declining
0
20
40
60
80
100
Jan-12
Jun-12
Nov-12
Apr-13
Sep-13
Feb-14
Jul-14
Dec-14
May-15
Oct-15
Mar-16
Aug-16
Jan-17
%
Overall smelter utilization rate
Large smelters (>200kt)
Medium-sized smelters (100-200kt)
Small smelters (20-100kt)
Demand for Zinc Metal Imports Increasing
754
1,131
1,201
1,295 1,237
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
kt
China zinc production Demand for imports
Source: Antaike, BGRIMM, Teck
10
Zinc Market
China is Important to the Zinc Market
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Mine
Production
Smelter
Production
Demand
kt
China Europe N.America ROW
Supply
• 40% of global mine production
• 45% of global smelter production
• 32% of global coated sheet production
‒ Grew from 20% in 2010
Demand
• 48% of global refined demand
China Has a Significant Impact Globally
11
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
0¢
20¢
40¢
60¢
80¢
100¢
120¢
140¢
160¢
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
LME Stocks SHFE Price
Zinc Market
Metal Inventories Close to Historical Lows
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
0¢
50¢
100¢
150¢
200¢
250¢
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
LME Stocks SHFE Price
US¢/lb
Plotted to September 8, 2017
Source: LME/SHFE
• Below 2005/2006 levels, with LME and SHFE down 259 kt in 2017
• SHFE down 130 kt since March peak
• Price is now reacting
• May be more hidden stocks available, with some enroute to Asia
Daily Zinc Prices & Stocks
Stocks
12
• 94% of LME stocks in New Orleans (NOLA)
• LME metal is slab zinc
– 70% of US demand is from steel mills
demanding customized jumbos
• Majority of NOLA zinc is:
– European origin
– Duty unpaid (1.2%): 1.6¢ premium on
$3,000/t zinc
• Majority of zinc from ~2008-2010
– Concerns about condition
– Has white rust, which causes high dross
• Customers rejecting NOLA material
Zinc Market
Available LME Stocks Almost Exhausted
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17
Available Cancelled
Cancelled stocks unavailable for lending/borrowing on LME contracts
NOLA Cancelled Metal
13
Zinc Market
Pinch Point Reached
0¢
50¢
100¢
150¢
200¢
250¢
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Jan 2014 Jan 2013
Jan 2015
Jan 2016
Jan 2017
2003
2004
2006
2007
2005
Mar 2017
Days of stocks
September 7, 2017
2013 to 2017
2003 to 2007
US¢/lb
Data plotted from 2000 to September 7, 2017Source: LME, SHFE, Wood Mackenzie
Zinc Prices vs. Days of Reported Stocks
14
Zinc Market
Defending / Expanding Zinc Market
Giga Steel
Ultrahigh-strength & galvanizable competes
well with aluminum.
Source: IZA, New York State Thruway Authority, Zinc.org
Continuous Galvanized Rebar
High productivity process which enables
coated rebar to be shaped in the field.
Zinc Thermal Spray
Portable technology to spray molten zinc
onto a steel surface .
Zinc Micro-Nutrient Fertilizer
Zinc micronutrient in fertilizer well accepted
and growing market.
15
Zinc Market
Red Dog Seasonality
• Operates 12 months
• Ships ~ 4 months
• Shipments to inventory in Canada
and Europe; Direct sales to Asia
• ~65% of zinc sales in second half
of year
• ~100% of lead sales in second
half of year
21%
14%
31%
34%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Zinc Sales1
0% 1%
55%
44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Lead Sales1
1. Average of 2010 to 2016.16
Zinc Market
Attractive Red Dog Concentrate Quality
• Low iron
• Base feed for our customers
• Good zinc grade
• Low precious metal content
(silver value: ~$15/dmt)
• High zinc content; by-products
valued in China
• Low precious metal content
(silver value: ~$250/dmt)
Consistent, Reliable Supply of
Zinc Concentrate
Clean Lead Concentrate
17
Zinc Market
Red Dog Zinc Concentrate Sales Distribution
Shows Consistency
Asia
33%
Canada
30%
Europe
37%
2016
Asia
28%
Canada
26%
Europe
46%
2000
18
Zinc Market
Red Dog Lead Sales Distribution
Reflects Market Evolution
Asia
48%
Europe
52%
2000
Asia
97%
Canada
3%
2016
19
Zinc Market
Trail Refined Metal Sales
Primarily the United States
United
States
84%
Asia
10%
Canada
6%
Zinc
United
States
98%
Asia &
Other
2%
Lead
20
• The “Zinc Gap”: outlook is for a strong
market
• Red Dog zinc concentrate customer
base stable
• Red Dog zinc concentrate quality is a
base feed for our customers
• Red Dog lead concentrate quality
favorable in China, the largest market
Zinc Market
Summary
21
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
September 19, 2017
Adrian King, Head of Exploration
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
Forward Looking Information
Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in
other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include mineral resource and exploration target
estimates, exploration potential of deposits near our Red Dog mine and Aktigiruq potential to be a world class deposit.
These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in
Teck’s public filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and
accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, the accuracy of our geological and exploration work in
respect of the exploration target estimates, the accuracy of our mineral resources estimates (including with respect to size, grade and recoverability) and
the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, assumptions that future geological work will support, and be consistent with,
the Aktigiruq exploration target results, assumptions regarding the representativeness of the current Aktigiruq exploration results, and assumptions
regarding receipts of any required approvals. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive.
Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions, results of
further exploration work not supporting or being consistent with the Aktigiruq exploration target results, unanticipated operational difficulties, unanticipated
operational difficulties at Red Dog, inability to realize exploration potential, conclusions of future economic or geological evaluations, difficulty in obtaining
or maintaining permits, and changes or further deterioration in general economic conditions. We will not achieve the maximum mine lives of our projects,
or be able to mine all reserves at our projects, if we do not obtain relevant permits relating to our plans and deterioration in economic conditions.
We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions,
risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as
well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and
on EDGAR (www.sec.gov).
2
“The job of our exploration department – indeed almost its sole purpose – is to
provide us with new ore bodies for development when we need them, as well as
maintain reserves at established mines. Whether this is done from the grassroots or
through negotiations is not important. What is important is that it is done.”
Norman B. Keevil, Chairman of the Board
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
Providing Orebodies for Development
3
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
Unique World-Class District
Continuing to deliver in a premier zinc district
WORLD-CLASS
DISTRICT
NEW
RESOURCES
OUTSTANDING
POTENTIAL
40 Years of Discovery &
25 Years of Mining
Anarraaq Inferred Resource¹
19.4 Mt @ 14.4% Zn, 4.2% Pb
Aktigiruq Exploration Target²
80-150 Mt @ 16-18% Zn+Pb
1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017.
2. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature.
There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.
4
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Red Dog Creek
staining noted
USGS Open File “Red Dog”
3% ZnPb samples
Teck (Cominco)
Stakes first claims
Su-Lik
discovery
Qanaiyaq
discovery
Red Dog Main
discovery
Landmark agreement
between NANA &
Cominco
Aqqaluk
discovery.
Paalaaq
discovery.
Paalaaq N.
discovery.
Anarraaq
discovery.
Aktigiruq
discovery.
Anarraaq
Extension.
Anarraaq
South.
Production:
Red Dog Main
Production:
Aqqaluk
Production:
Qanaiyaq
Aktigiruq
Extension
ProductionActive Exploration
5
• Significant land-holding
• 350 km2 of highly
prospective NANA and
State lands
• Focus on enhancing
resource certainty and
defining future
developments
• Multi-year program
• Multi disciplinary approach
Paalaaq
Su-Lik
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
Red Dog Main
Aqqaluk
Qanaiyaq
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
Outstanding Exploration Potential
Multiple deposits; multiple options
Red Dog District (100% Teck)
Red Dog Mine (Teck / NANA)
Lik (Teck / Solitario)
Deposits
Prospects
6
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
Numerous Regional Targets
Paalaaq
Su-Lik
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
Red Dog Main
Aqqaluk
Qanaiyaq
1. Mine Area Cluster
• Qanaiyaq
• Main
• Aqqaluk
• Paalaaq
2. Anarraaq-Aktigiruq
Cluster
• Variable characteristics
Two major deposit clusters
Red Dog District (100% Teck)
Red Dog Mine (Teck / NANA)
Lik (Teck / Solitario)
Deposits
Prospects
7
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
Anarraaq-Aktigiruq Cluster
Significant Intercepts
Non-Significant Intercepts
Too Short
Non Aktigiruq Drill Collars
Legend
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017.8
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
Building a Quality Zinc Inventory
Potential New GIANT system
GIANT ZINC DEPOSITS +6 Mt Zn+Pb
Aktigiruq ExplorationTarget1
80-150 Mt
16-18% Zn+Pb
Sources: S&P Global Market Intelligence, SNL Metals & Mining Database, Teck Public Disclosures.
1. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature.
There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
GradeZn+Pb%
ContainedZn+Pb(Mt)
9
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
Global Context of Teck’s Zinc Resources
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
GradeZn+Pb%
Resource Million Tonnes
Red Dog
Past Production
Rampura
Agucha
Broken Hill
McArthur River
GIANT ZINC DEPOSITS (+6 Mt Zn+Pb)
Qanaiyaq
Aqqaluk
Well Positioned; World Class
Teena
Anarraaq
Paalaaq
Su-Lik Hermosa
Sources: S&P Global Market Intelligence, SNL Metals & Mining Database, Teck Public Disclosures.
1. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature.
There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.
Aktigiruq Exploration Target1
80-150 Mt
16-18% Zn+Pb
10
Red Dog Exploration Part 1
Thank You & See You at Red Dog
The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by
Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. For
further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and
Technical Report (43-101) dated Feb 21, 2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com
The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a
qualified person under NI 43-101. For further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and Technical Report (43-101) dated February 21,
2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com
Red Dog Operations
September 20, 2017
Henri Letient, General Manager, Red Dog
Red Dog Operations
Forward Looking Information
Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in
other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to our Red Dog
production guidance, progress in addressing production challenges, projected mill feed rate and projected benefits of VIP2 project.
These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in
Teck’s public filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and
accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, general business and economic conditions, the supply
and demand for, deliveries of, and the level and volatility of prices of, zinc, our costs of production and production and productivity levels, as well as those
of our competitors, power prices, assumptions that the VIP2 project operates as anticipated, the accuracy of our reserve estimates (including with respect
to size, grade and recoverability) and the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, conditions in financial markets, the
future financial performance of the company, our ability to attract and retain skilled staff, our ability to procure equipment and operating supplies, positive
results from the studies on our expansion projects, our ability to obtain permits for our operations and expansions, our ongoing relations with our
employees and business partners. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive.
Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, changes in commodity prices, changes in market demand for our
products, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions, unanticipated operational difficulties (including failure of plant, equipment or processes to
operate in accordance with specifications or expectations, cost escalation, unavailability of materials and equipment, government action or delays in the
receipt of government approvals, industrial disturbances or other job action, adverse weather conditions and unanticipated events related to health, safety
and environmental matters), changes in the financial market in general, unanticipated increases in costs to construct our development projects, difficulty
in obtaining permits or securing transportation for our products, inability to address concerns regarding permits of environmental impact assessments,
changes in tax benefits or tax rates, and changes or deterioration in general economic conditions.
We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions,
risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as
well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and
on EDGAR (www.sec.gov).
2
Overview
Development History
Operations
Sustainability & People
Looking Forward
Red Dog Operations
Agenda
3
Red Dog Operations
Our Vision
With strong foundations in a world class zinc district,
we maintain our position as a long term low cost producer
in the global zinc market.
Together with our partner NANA1, we operate responsibly
by creating a safe and sustainable environment
for our people and the region.
1. Northwest Alaska Native Association (NANA).4
• 1,000 km northwest of Anchorage, Alaska
• 240 km north of Arctic Circle
• Western end of Brooks Range
• Began operations in 1989
Red Dog Operations
Remote Location & Access
5
Remote; Extreme Climate
• ~100 day shipping season
• ~120 day exploration season
Deposits
• Main (mined out)
• Aqqaluk (2010 start)
• Qanaiyaq (2017 start)
Current Reserves1
• 50.9 Mt @ 15.0% Zn, 4.2% Pb,
76 g/t Ag
1. As at December 31, 2016. Please see our latest Annual Information Form for additional details.
Red Dog Operations
Operating North of the Arctic Circle
6
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Thousandtonnes
Thousandtonnes
Ore Milled Per Year (Left Axis) Zinc Metal (Right Axis)
Red Dog Operations
Zinc Production has Grown
PRI VIP1
Ore Milled and Zinc Metal1
1. PRI means Production Rate Increase. VIP means Value Improvement Project.
Original design throughput rate
7
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Red Dog Operations
Lower Zinc Grades; Consistent Recoveries
Ore Milled Per Year (kt Profile) Zinc Metal (kt Profile)
Zinc Grades & Recoveries
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Recovery(%)
Grade(%)
Zinc Grade (Left Axis) Zinc Recovery (Right Axis)
8
Red Dog Operations
Lead Production has Grown
1. PRI means Production Rate Increase. VIP means Value Improvement Project.
Ore Milled and Lead Metal1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Thousandtonnes
Thousandtonnes
Ore Milled Per Year (Left Axis) Lead Metal (Right Axis)
PRI VIP1
9
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Red Dog Operations
Lower Lead Grades; Consistent Recoveries
Ore Milled Per Year (kt Profile) Lead Metal (kt Profile)
Lead Grades & Recoveries
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Recovery(%)
Grade(%)
Lead Grade (Left Axis) Lead Recovery (Right Axis)
10
Late 1992: Installation of Ball Mill 1 and Ball Mill 2, which increased
throughput
1994-1995: Installation of additional Pb and Zn columns, which
improved Pb and Zn recoveries
1997: Commissioning of “Production Rate Increase”, PRI, including
SAG Mill 3, Ball Mill 4, some Zn flotation capacity, new reagent
building, and the gyratory crusher
1998: Commissioning of additional Pb flotation capacity
2001: Commissioning of “Value Improvement Project”, VIP, including
Zn thickener, powerhouse expansion and more Zn flotation capacity
2007: Commissioning of the prefloat Jameson Cell
2012: Commissioning of zinc IsaMills
Red Dog Operations
Many Improvements Projects
11
Red Dog Operations
Key Production Statistics
2014 2015 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017
2017
Guidance
Additional
Guidance
Tonnes milled (kt) 4,300 4,026 4,250 1,019 1,117
Zinc
Grade (%) 16.6 16.7 17.1 14.7 14.2
Recovery (%) 83.3 84.2 82.8 80.3 80.6
Concentrate (kt) 1,060 1,014 1,052 221 236
Production (kt) 596 567 583 120 128 525-550
5 Year:
475-550
Lead:
Grade (%) 4.4 4.8 4.9 5.5 5.2
Recovery (%) 65.3 60.7 56.0 51.6 54.7
Concentrate (kt) 219 212 228 53 60
Production (kt) 123 118 122 29 32 110-115
3 Year:
85-115
Total Metal (kt) 719 685 705 149 160
12
Red Dog Operations
Addressing Production Challenges
Focus Area Challenge Progress
Qanaiyaq (Qan)
Plan requires a
certain feed rate to
meet LOM production
and metallurgy needs
• Variable metallurgical
performance
• Increased selenium levels in pit
lake and tailings
• Reduced Qan mill feed % &
modified waste rock management
‒ Allowed mill performance to
return to forecast levels
‒ Se levels stabilized
• Slowly returning Qan % to
required limit to meet production
and maintain blend through life of
mine
Mine Plan
Sequencing
Small sequencing
changes can have
significant year-over-
year production
impacts
• Corrective pit sequencing
actions to account for production
challenges in late 2016 has
impacted 2017 forecast
• Correcting H1 2017 production
challenges is altering previous 5-
year production profile
• Localized pit design change:
addressed slope stability issue
and resulted in higher grade ore
available in 2017
• Sequencing optimization in
progress to maintain steady
concentrate production
13
Red Dog Operations
VIP2 Aims to Optimize Value Capture
• Throughput increases by average 15%, while mine life is maintained
• Lower unit cost allows for lower cut-off and direct use of marginal ore
‒ Increased marginal ore expected from 2020; would be wasted
without VIP2 (+6 Mt ore)
• Requires tailings dam raise
‒ Permitting, lift configuration & CapEx studies in progress
• Full NANA support
Sanction decision September 2017
14
Overview
Development History
Operations
Sustainability & People
Looking Forward
Red Dog Operations
Agenda
15
Red Dog Operations
Working with Indigenous Peoples in the Arctic
Celebrated 25 years of operations
in 2014 & 25 years of concentrate
shipping in 2015
Unique agreement between Teck,
as operator, and NANA, who own
the land
Benefits:
• >US$1 billion in proceeds for
NANA from the mine
• More than half of employees are
NANA shareholders
• Protecting subsistence way of life
• Long life, world class zinc mine
16
Red Dog Operations
First Discovery
1955-1970: First Recognition
• 1955: Irv Tailleur (USGS) visits Ferric
Creek
• 1968: Pilot Bob Baker notes Red Dog
Creek staining & informs Tailleur
• 1970: Tailleur USGS open file “Red
Dog” 3% Pb+Zn samples
1973: Staking Withdrawal for 5 years;
Wilderness Classification
• 1974: Sen. T. Stevens funds mineral
assessment study
1975: Government-Sponsored Study
• Press release on August 30, 1975
Naturally occurring Iron oxide staining in drainage;
similar to Red Dog before discovery.
Old-school frontier prospecting
& mapping period
17
Red Dog Operations
Exploration Companies Take Action
1975: Teck (Cominco) and others react
• Teck on site within two weeks
• Recognize potential
• Stake first claims September 8, 1975
1976: USBM publish results
• Float / in-situ mineralization of up to
14% Zn, 3-4% Pb, 2-3 oz/t Ag
• Anomalous geochem over 3,000 x
9,000 ft area
1976: Su and Lik discovered
• Showings and Silt Geochem
• GCO stakes Lik; Cominco stakes Su.
1976: Land status
• NANA apply to BLM to establish
ownership of Red Dog area
Showing
Stream
sediment
anomalies
Red Dog
Creek
18
Resolution of competing title claims
critical
• NANA leaders visited other Teck
operations
1981: Letter of Intent between NANA
and Teck
• Drill deposit on 400’ centres
• Before land status was resolved
1982: Landmark agreement between
NANA and Teck
• Teck to operate under a lease
agreement
• Ultimately schedule to 50:50 profit
share
Red Dog Operations
Teck Partnership with NANA
19
People:
• Arctic discovery, operational experience
• Technical teams: persistent, driven
Technical:
• Old school frontier prospecting
• Conventional silt geochem, mapping,
drilling
Opportunity Recognition & Capacity to
Execute
• Quick to act and understand significance
• Dogged pursuit in face of legal hurdles
• Significant Senior Management support
Community Engagement
• Proactive approach well ahead of its time
• Established foundation for a long-term
successful partnership
Red Dog Operations
Critical Success Factors 1978-1984
20
• Initial development began 1986, with the installation of a
shallow water dock and small staging area at the port site
• Major construction on the road & mine site started 1987
• Mill largely built in modules in the Philippines, transported
by barge to the coast and module movers to site
• Construction completed November 1989
Red Dog Operations
>30-Year Development History
21
• Move up to 2000 tons
• 200 independently driven wheels
• 3 x 500 HP engines
• 2-5 mph
Red Dog Operations
Module Transporters
22
• Powerhouse module 71’ x 68’ x 50’ high -> weight 800 tons
• Flotation module 114’ x 64’ x 75’ high -> weight 1,600 tons
Red Dog Operations
Powerhouse Module in Transit
23
Red Dog Operations
Powerhouse Module at Site
24
Overview
Development History
Operations
Sustainability & People
Looking Forward
Red Dog Operations
Agenda
25
Red Dog Operations
Mine Area Deposits
Structurally
thrust-stacked
systems
Structural slices
of one larger
system
Originally along
north-trending
corridor
Deposits can
be blind under
younger / older
sequences
500 m
Qanaiyaq
Main
Aqqaluk
Paalaaq
26
Red Dog Operations
Mining Process
27
Red Dog Operations
Mobile Production Equipment Fleet
• 10 Haul Trucks (777D/F 100 Ton)
• 5 Loaders (993K)
• 4 Excavators (various sizes)
• 4 Dozers (D9/D10)
• 2 Graders
• 3 DML Drills
28
Primary: Gyratory Crusher
• 42” x 65”
• 300 kW / 400 hp
• Manufactured by Allis-Chalmers
• 1,090 tonnes / 1,200 tons per hour
Backup: Jaw Crusher
• 42” x 60”
• 150 kW / 200 hp
• Manufactured by Fuller-Taylor
• 635 tonnes / 700 tons per hour
Red Dog Operations
Two Crushers
29
Red Dog Operations
Milling Process
30
Red Dog Operations
Grinding Equipment
• Primary Grinding – 3 SAG Mills
• Secondary/Tertiary Grinding – 4 Ball Mills
• Regrind
o 3 Tower Mills (Lead circuit)
o 2 IsaMills (Zinc circuit)
SAG Mill # Manufacturer Diamater (ft) Length (ft) Motor (kW/hp) Media Size (in)
1 & 2 Fuller 22 8.5 1,500 / 2,000 4 & 5
3 Fuller 22 8.5 2,000 / 2,650 4 & 5
Ball Mill # Manufacturer Diamater (ft) Length (ft) Motor (kW/hp) Media Size (in)
1 & 2 Marcy 12 12 930 / 1,250 1
3 Marcy 10.7 15 750 / 1,000 1
4 Fuller 16 18.5 2,250 / 3,000 2.75
Tower Mill # Manufacturer Motor (kW/hp) Media Size (in)
1, 2, 3 MPSI 350 / 450 0.5
IsaMill M5000 Manufacturer Motor (kW/hp) Media Size (mm)
Rougher Xstrata 1,500 / 2,000 5
Retreat Xstrata 1,500 / 2,000 3
31
• Prefloat Circuit
• Lead Circuit
• Zinc Circuit
Prefloat Circuit # Of Cells Cell Type Manufacturer Dimensions Rotor/Stator
Rougher 6 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3
OK50
Cleaner 1 Jameson Glencore 18' diameter -
Lead Circuit # Of Cells Cell Type Manufacturer Dimensions Rotor/Stator
Rougher 10 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3
OK50
Scavenger 5 Conventional Outokumpu 16 m3
OK16
Primary Column 1 Column AG&P 13.5' ft dia, 42' tall -
Secondary Columns 4 Column AG&P 9' ft dia, 38' tall -
Zinc Circuit # Of Cells Cell Type Manufacturer Dimensions Rotor/Stator
Rougher 12 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3
OK50
Cleaner 17 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3
OK50/OK38
Cleaner Columns 6 Column CPT 12' ft dia, 52' tall -
Retreat 15 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3
OK50/OK38
Retreat Columns 2 Column CPT 12' ft dia, 52' tall -
Red Dog Operations
Flotation Equipment
32
Lead Thickener
• 60’ diameter
• 15.5’ height
• Manufactured by Eimco
Zinc Thickener
• 140’ diameter
• 12.5’ height
• Manufactured by Eimco
Filter Presses
• Lead circuit: 1 Lasta filter press
• Zinc circuit: 4 Lasta filter presses
• Manufactured by Ingersoll-Rand
• 100 psi air pressure during operation
Red Dog Operations
Dewatering Equipment
33
8 diesel generators
5.0 megawatt per unit
24.5 megawatt needed
40,000 gallons of diesel
fuel/day
Engine cooling used to
heat the buildings
Red Dog Operations
Power Generation Equipment
34
Red Dog Operations
Port Operations
35
Red Dog Operations
Seasonal Port Operations
Each shipping season (~100
days; July to late October):
• Services 22-26 vessels &
3-4 barges
• Ships out:
‒ >1M wmt Zn con
‒ >200K wmt Pb con
• Brings in:
‒ ~1,500 containers
‒ 18-20M gallons of fuel
‒ >40 kt of freight
36
Red Dog Operations
Agenda
Overview
Development History
Operations
Sustainability & People
Looking Forward
37
Red Dog Operations
Safety is a Core Value
38
More than half of employees are NANA
shareholders
• 447 regular (52% NANA)
• 65 seasonal & temporary (93% NANA)
Committed to 100% NANA shareholder
employment at Red Dog
Red Dog Operations
Partnering with NANA on Employment & Training
39
Pre-Employment (Elementary & High School)
• Career Awareness (10 schools; 60 students)
• Job Shadow (10 schools; 60 students)
Summer Student & Intern Program
Post Secondary Scholarships
• 4 year degree & vocational/technical programs
• Aqqaluk Trust Fund
• University of Alaska
Red Dog Operations
Providing Educational Opportunities
40
Red Dog Operations
Environmental, Health, Safety & Community Policy
Key is ‘PIC’, which is our commitment to:
• Prevent pollution and reduce waste
• Continuously Improve identification of environmental, health, and safety
risks and eliminate, isolate, or mitigate the risks that could injure or harm
people, the environment, local communities, or subsistence resources
• Comply with all environmental, health and safety laws, regulations, permits,
and other environmental, health, safety, and community commitments
41
66 Permits
44 Bodies of Regulation
17 Agreements
23 Work Plans
5 Approvals
9 Standards
4 Court Orders
~3,000
Compliance
Requirements
>28,000
Tasks
Annually
Red Dog Operations
Extensive Environmental Requirements
42
~3,000 ft (1,000m)
Red Dog Operations
Extensive Site Water Management
43
BeforeMining(1982)
AfterMining(2005)
Red Dog Operations
Improved Middle Fork Red Dog Creek
44
“Ten years of aquatic surveys have
demonstrated that aquatic productivity in
the Main Stem has increased from pre-
mining conditions due to effective water
management practices and treatment.”
-Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, March 2006
Red Dog Operations
Effective Water Management
45
Red Dog Operations
Protecting Subsistence Lifestyle
46
Involved In:
• Operations overview
• Construction activities
• Exploration activities
• Mine water discharge
• Drinking water issues
• Fish studies
• Air quality
• Fugitive dust prevention
• Caribou
• Marine mammals
• Shipping season
• Major projects
• Closure planning
Red Dog Operations
Formed Subsistence Committee
47
Red Dog Operations
Respecting Subsistence Lifestyle
48
Red Dog Operations
Significant Community Engagement
49
Village Wild Seed Collection Program
• Collaborating with NANA and the State
of Alaska Plant Material Center
• Pilot program to determine seed
availability and collection potential
• Seeds to be used for reclamation at
Red Dog
Red Dog Operations
Advancing Community Development
50
Red Dog Operations
Agenda
Overview
Development History
Operations
Sustainability & People
Looking Forward
51
Minex integration:
• Fully integrated Exploration, MinEx and
Mine Geology team
• Strategic alignment with business unit
Focused on:
• 2nd generation mapping
• Geotechnical and Geomet support
• Geological research and modeling
• MineEx resource delineation - conversion
• Resource expansion at Anarraaq
• Resource potential of Aktigiruq / Wulik
• New district discoveries
• LOM resource potential
Red Dog Operations
Investing for Success
52
Red Dog Operations
Excellent Extension Potential
Focusing on near-mine & district
satellite areas, particularly:
• Anarraaq - new mineral resource
• Aktigiruq - 18 km drill program
Lik
Su
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
Aqqaluk
Paalaaq
Main
Qanaiyaq
~15 km
53
Red Dog Operations
Strong foundations in a world class zinc district
 Great partnership with NANA
 Maintaining steady output through variations in ore quality & grades
 Challenging environment with limited shipping window; history of meeting
these challenges well
 Focus on people, emphasizing local hire and development
 Protecting the environment and the subsistence lifestyle is paramount
54
Red Dog Operations
Closing Remarks
Thank you for visiting Red Dog
55
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
September 20, 2017
Adrian King, Head of Exploration
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Forward Looking Information
Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in
other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include mineral resource and exploration target
estimates, exploration potential of deposits near our Red Dog mine and Aktigiruq potential to be a world class deposit and the value delivered by our
exploration efforts.
These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in
Teck’s public filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and
accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, the accuracy of our geological and exploration work in
respect of the exploration target estimates, the accuracy of our mineral resources estimates (including with respect to size, grade and recoverability) and
the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, assumptions that future geological work will support, and be consistent with,
the Aktigiruq exploration target results, assumptions regarding the representativeness of the current Aktigiruq exploration results, and assumptions
regarding receipts of any required approvals. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive.
Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions, results of
further exploration work not supporting or being consistent with the Aktigiruq exploration target results, unanticipated operational difficulties, unanticipated
operational difficulties at Red Dog, inability to realize exploration potential, conclusions of future economic or geological evaluations, difficulty in obtaining
or maintaining permits, and changes or further deterioration in general economic conditions. We will not achieve the maximum mine lives of our projects,
or be able to mine all reserves at our projects, if we do not obtain relevant permits relating to our plans and deterioration in economic conditions.
We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions,
risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as
well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and
on EDGAR (www.sec.gov).
2
Providing Orebodies for Development
Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District
40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production
Advancing District Understanding
Resources for the Future
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Agenda
3
“The job of our exploration department – indeed almost its sole purpose – is to
provide us with new ore bodies for development when we need them, as well as
maintain reserves at established mines. Whether this is done from the grassroots or
through negotiations is not important. What is important is that it is done.”
Norman B. Keevil, Chairman of the Board
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Providing Orebodies for Development
4
Providing Orebodies for Development
Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District
40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production
Advancing District Understanding
Resources for the Future
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Agenda
5
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Unique World-Class District
Continuing to deliver in a premier zinc district
WORLD-CLASS
DISTRICT
NEW
RESOURCES
OUTSTANDING
POTENTIAL
40 Years of Discovery &
25 Years of Mining
Anarraaq Inferred Resource¹
19.4 Mt @ 14.4% Zn, 4.2% Pb
Aktigiruq Exploration Target²
80-150 Mt @ 16-18% Zn+Pb
1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017.
2. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature.
There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.
6
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Location & Setting
Best belt, large high-grade deposits
• Targeting the best zinc belts
and the largest deposits
• Red Dog district located in the
Brooks Range on the western
margin of North America
• Black shale Sediment Hosted
Massive Sulphide deposits
• Deposits are distinctly higher
grade relative to other basins
along the western margin of
North America
Anchorage
7
• Significant land-holding
• 350 km2 of highly
prospective NANA and
State lands
• Focus on enhancing
resource certainty and
defining future
developments
• Multi-year program
• Multi disciplinary approach
Paalaaq
Su-Lik
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
Red Dog Main
Aqqaluk
Qanaiyaq
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Outstanding Exploration Potential
Multiple deposits; multiple options
Red Dog District (100% Teck)
Red Dog Mine (Teck / NANA)
Lik (Teck / Solitario)
Deposits
Prospects
8
Providing Orebodies for Development
Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District
40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production
Advancing District Understanding
Resources for the Future
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Agenda
9
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Surfacing the District Potential
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Red Dog Creek
staining noted
USGS Open File “Red Dog”
3% ZnPb samples
Su-Lik
discovery
Qanaiyaq
discovery
Red Dog Main
discovery
Landmark agreement
between NANA &
Cominco
Production:
Red Dog Main
Production:
Aqqaluk
Production:
Qanaiyaq
Qanaiyaq
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
Paalaaq
Su-Lik
Aqqaluk
Main
Looking Northwest
Aqqaluk
discovery.
Paalaaq
discovery.
Paalaaq N.
discovery.
Anarraaq
discovery.
Aktigiruq
discovery.
Anarraaq
Extension.
Anarraaq
South.
Aktigiruq
Extension
1995 - Aqqaluk discovered
DH: 180m @ 16% Zn, 3% Pb
Pre-Mine Reserve:
52.7Mt @ 16.7% Zn, 4.3% Pb
(NI 43-101, 9 March 2007, SEDAR)
1996-7 – Paalaaq, Paalaaq
North discovered
1999 - Anarraaq discovered
DH: 16m @ 30% Zn, 6% Pb
2001 - Aktigiruq discovered
2009 - 2011 Anarraaq Ext,
Anarraaq South discovered
2015+ - Aktigiruq expansion
Teck (Cominco)
Stakes first claims
ProductionActive Exploration
10
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Red Dog Creek
staining noted
USGS Open File “Red Dog”
3% ZnPb samples
Teck (Cominco)
Stakes first claims
Su-Lik
discovery
Qanaiyaq
discovery
Red Dog Main
discovery
Landmark agreement
between NANA &
Cominco
Aqqaluk
discovery.
Paalaaq
discovery.
Paalaaq N.
discovery.
Anarraaq
discovery.
Aktigiruq
discovery.
Anarraaq
Extension.
Anarraaq
South.
Production:
Red Dog Main
Production:
Aqqaluk
Production:
Qanaiyaq
Aktigiruq
Extension
ProductionActive Exploration
11
Providing Orebodies for Development
Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District
40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production
Advancing District Understanding
Resources for the Future
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Agenda
12
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
High-Grade World-Class Deposits
(Blevings et al., 2013)
Sea Level
Source of Fluids
Source of Metals
Red Dog Deposits
Silt and Shale Black Shale Carbonate
Laminated
Barite
Massive Barite Base Metals
Sulphides
Vein-hosted ore Silica rock ore
~50-100km
~1000-2000m
13
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Multiple Deposits; Variable Characteristics
Exploration Implications
• Detachment, relocation and
deformation complicates exploration
• Decades of study permit exploration in
challenging structure and stratigraphy
• Fe-sulphide and barite associations
detectable with geophysics
• Lithogeochemical studies and pyrite
chemistry provide vectors
• Deposits are zoned
Fault-bound and detached nature of Aqqaluk
Challenging stratigraphy
14
STRUCTURAL
MAPPING
GEOPHYSICAL
SURVEYS
GEOCHEMICAL
VECTORING
ACADEMIC
RESEARCH
MODELING &
INTERP
FOCUSED
DRILLING
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Building on our History of Discovery
Integrated multi-disciplinary, multi-year approach
15
Red Dog District Drilling 2004-2017E
Integrated exploration
from prospect to mine
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Ongoing District Drilling
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017E
Mine Regional
16
Providing Orebodies for Development
Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District
40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production
Advancing District Understanding
Resources for the Future
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Agenda
17
Paalaaq
Su-Lik
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
Red Dog Main
Aqqaluk
Qanaiyaq
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Numerous Regional Targets
1. Mine Area Cluster
• Qanaiyaq
• Main
• Aqqaluk
• Paalaaq
2. Anarraaq-Aktigiruq
Cluster
• Variable characteristics
Two major deposit clusters
Red Dog District (100% Teck)
Red Dog Mine (Teck / NANA)
Lik (Teck / Solitario)
Deposits
Prospects
18
Qanaiyaq
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
Paalaaq
Su-Lik
Aqqaluk
Main
A
A’
Qanaiyaq-Paalaaq
Deposit Cluster
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Mine Area Deposit Cluster
Qanaiyaq PaalaaqAqqalukMain
A A’
Looking Northwest
(South) (North)
Creating value through long-term planning
1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017.
1
19
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Recognizing the Full Potential
Anarraaq Resource1 (pre-mine)
Resource
Category
Tonnes
(Mt)
Zn
(%)
Pb
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Inferred 19.4 14.4 4.2 73
Drill Collars
Legend
1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017.
Anarraaq
• Discovered in 1999
• ~1km by 0.5km; depth 400m-1,000m
• Sits beneath a major barite deposit
Anarraaq
20
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Anarraaq-Aktigiruq Cluster
Significant Intercepts
Non-Significant Intercepts
Too Short
Non Aktigiruq Drill Collars
Legend
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
Select Significant Intercepts1
HOLE Intercept (m)
Zn
(%)
Pb
(%) Zone
DDH1121 11.7 8.5 2.1 Upper
DDH1730 9.6 8.6 4.5 Upper
DDH1737 5.6 8.8 8.0 Upper
DDH1745 3.0 9.9 0.7 Upper
DDH1114 14.0 16.8 4.0 Central
DDH1114 5.2 45.8 3.5 Central
DDH1121 34.1 15.0 2.0 Central
DDH1730 25.4 21.5 4.1 Central
DDH1737 54.6 16.8 3.6 Central
DDH1745 13.6 19.7 5.5 Central
1. Refer to disclosure dated September 18, 2017 available on SEDAR. Calculated using 8% Zn+Pb cut-off, Minimum 3.05m core length, 3.05m dilution.
Aktigiruq Pre-2017 Drilling
• 20,000m in 25 holes into deposit
• ~3km by 1.5km; depth 400m-1,000m
• Open in several directions
21
Aktigiruq 2017 Program
• Geological modeling
• Geotechnical and Geomet support
• Resource potential of Aktigiruq,
internal continuity, limits of the system
• On-going drilling
• Additional significant intercepts
• Remains open in several directions
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Aktigiruq
Significant Intercepts
Non-Significant Intercepts
Too Short
Non Aktigiruq Drill Collars
Legend
Aktigiruq
Anarraaq
22
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Anarraaq-Aktigiruq Cluster
C
C’
Anarraaq¹
Aktigiruq²
Aktigiruq Exploration Target:
• 80-150 Mt
• 16-18% Zn+Pb
Select Intercepts:
• DDH 1730:25.4m @ 21.4% Zn, 4.1% Pb
• DDH 1737:54.6m @ 16.8% Zn, 3.6% Pb
1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine dated February 21, 2017 and press release of September 18, 2017 both available on SEDAR .
2. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result
in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.
Looking North
projected to surface
23
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Surfacing Value at Anarraaq-Aktigiruq
1km
DDH1737 : 54.6m @ 16.8% Zn 3.6% Pb
0m
Looking Northwest
-1000m
+1000m
Low Grade/Pyritic Mineralization (upper)
High Grade Mineralization (central)
C C’
DDH1714: 42m @ 18.3% Zn 4.5% Pb,
incl. 23m @ 23.2% Zn 5.2% Pb
DDH1718: 54.7m @ 15.7% Zn, 4.0% Pb
incl. 11.2m @ 34.2% Zn, 11.5% Pb
Anarraaq Aktigiruq
Red Dog Plate
Wolverine Creek Plate
??
24
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Building a Quality Zinc Inventory
Potential New GIANT system
GIANT ZINC DEPOSITS +6 Mt Zn+Pb
Aktigiruq ExplorationTarget1
80-150 Mt
16-18% Zn+Pb
Sources: S&P Global Market Intelligence, SNL Metals & Mining Database, Teck Public Disclosures.
1. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature.
There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
GradeZn+Pb%
ContainedZn+Pb(Mt)
25
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Global Context of Teck’s Zinc Resources
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
GradeZn+Pb%
Resource Million Tonnes
Red Dog
Past Production
Rampura
Agucha
Broken Hill
McArthur River
GIANT ZINC DEPOSITS (+6 Mt Zn+Pb)
Qanaiyaq
Aqqaluk
Teena
Anarraaq
Paalaaq
Su-Lik
Aktigiruq Exploration Target1
80-150 Mt
16-18% Zn+Pb
Hermosa
Sources: S&P Global Market Intelligence, SNL Metals & Mining Database, Teck Public Disclosures.
1. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature.
There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.
Well Positioned; World Class
26
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Delivering Value Through Exploration
The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by
Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. For
further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and
Technical Report (43-101) dated Feb 21, 2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com
• 40 years of discovery & 25 years of production
• In collaboration with mine site, exploration is delivering…
‒ Timely, quality geoscience across all phases of operations
‒ Integrated multi-disciplinary approach to exploration and
discovery
‒ New ore bodies for development when we need them
• Multiple development options
‒ Multiple GIANT high-grade deposits; two major deposit clusters
• Outstanding exploration potential
27
Red Dog Exploration Part 2
Thank You For Visiting Red Dog
The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by
Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. For
further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and
Technical Report (43-101) dated Feb 21, 2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com
The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a
qualified person under NI 43-101. For further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and Technical Report (43-101) dated February 21,
2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com
Vancouver and Red Dog Site Visit
September 18-20, 2017

Teck Vancouver and Red Dog Analyst Visit

  • 1.
    Vancouver and RedDog Site Visit September 18-20, 2017
  • 2.
    Update September 19, 2017 DonLindsay, President and Chief Executive Officer
  • 3.
    Update Forward Looking Information Boththese slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to expected timing of first oil from the Fort Hills project, amount and timing of dividends and dividend sustainability, and the potential for payment of base and supplemental dividends to be paid in the future, coal EBITDA and free cash flow potential, and 2017 coal production, cost, stripping and sustaining capital guidance. These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in Teck’s public filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, general business and economic conditions, the supply and demand for, deliveries of, and the level and volatility of prices of, zinc, copper and coal and other primary metals and minerals as well as oil, and related products, the timing of the receipt of regulatory and governmental approvals for our development projects and other operations, our costs of production and production and productivity levels, as well as those of our competitors, power prices, continuing availability of water and power resources for our operations, market competition, the accuracy of our reserve estimates (including with respect to size, grade and recoverability) and the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, conditions in financial markets, the future financial performance of the company, our ability to attract and retain skilled staff, our ability to procure equipment and operating supplies, positive results from the studies on our expansion projects, our coal and other product inventories, our ability to secure adequate transportation for our products, our ability to obtain permits for our operations and expansions, our ongoing relations with our employees and business partners and joint venturers. Our coal EBITDA and free cash flow potential are also based on assumptions included on the slide titled "Significant Earnings Potential". Assumptions regarding Fort Hills also include the assumption that project development and funding proceed as planned, assumptions of costs as set out in the sanction decision as well as assumptions noted on the relevant slides discussing Fort Hills. Payment of dividends is in the discretion of the board of directors. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, changes in commodity and power prices, changes in market demand for our products, changes in interest and currency exchange rates, acts of foreign governments and the outcome of legal proceedings, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions (including with respect to the size, grade and recoverability of mineral reserves and resources), unanticipated operational difficulties (including failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations, cost escalation, unavailability of materials and equipment, government action or delays in the receipt of government approvals, industrial disturbances or other job action, adverse weather conditions and unanticipated events related to health, safety and environmental matters), union labour disputes, political risk, social unrest, failure of customers or counterparties to perform their contractual obligations, changes in our credit ratings or the financial market in general, unanticipated increases in costs to construct our development projects, difficulty in obtaining permits or securing transportation for our products, inability to address concerns regarding permits of environmental impact assessments, changes in tax benefits or tax rates, resolution of environmental and other proceedings or disputes, and changes or deterioration in general economic conditions. Our Fort Hills project is not controlled by us and construction and production schedules may be adjusted by our partners. Statements concerning future production costs or volumes are based on numerous assumptions of management regarding operating matters and on assumptions that demand for products develops as anticipated, that customers and other counterparties perform their contractual obligations, that operating and capital plans will not be disrupted by issues such as mechanical failure, unavailability of parts and supplies, labour disturbances, interruption in transportation or utilities, adverse weather conditions, and that there are no material unanticipated variations in the cost of energy or supplies. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions, risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov). 2
  • 4.
    60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 US$/tonne HCC Spot PriceHypothetical HCC spot price excl. cyclone impacts?? Update Underlying Coal Price Volatility Appears More Muted Q4 2016 Spike • Fear of cyclone April 2017 Spike • Cyclone hits Coal Price Assessment Source: Argus Lower apparent volatility excluding cyclone impacts Plotted to September 11, 2017 3
  • 5.
    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Q12010 Q22010 Q32010 Q42010 Q12011 Q22011 Q32011 Q42011 Q12012 Q22012 Q32012 Q42012 Q12013 Q22013 Q32013 Q42013 Q12014 Q22014 Q32014 Q42014 Q12015 Q22015 Q32015 Q42015 Q12016 Q22016 Q32016 Q42016 Q12017 Q22017 Q32017 US$/tonne Teck Realized Price(lhs) Quarterly Contract (lhs) Teck Realized Price Relative to Contract (rhs) Sales Mix • 60% Shorter than quarterly pricing mechanisms (incl. “spot”) • 40% Quarterly contract price ‒ Index-linked pricing mechanism for premium steelmaking coal contracts from April 1, 2017 ‒ Majority based on average of key spot price assessments, on a trailing 3-month basis with a one month lag Average Realized Prices • Relativity to quarterly contract prices a function of product mix and timing of sales ‒ Product mix weighted to hard coking coal Historical Average Realized Prices vs. Quarterly Contract Prices1 Update Average Realized Steelmaking Coal Prices Averaged 94% 2014-2016 Average realized prices expected to remain similar to historical relationship with quarterly contract prices, in stable market conditions 1. Compares Teck’s average realized price to the negotiated quarterly benchmark prior to April 1, 2017, and to the index-linked quarterly contract price afterwards. The average realized price for Q3 2017 is based on the mid point of guidance. 4
  • 6.
    1. Please referto Teck and China Investment Corporation’s press releases dated September 5, 2017 for further details.. Update CIC Remains a Supportive Long-Term Partner 5 • July 2009: Acquires 101.3 million shares at ~C$17.21/share for ~C$1.7 billion • September 2017: Divests 42 million shares at ~C$28.97/share for ~C$1.2 billion on a “Bought Block Trade” basis, through J.P. Morgan • Currently: Holds 59.3 million shares, for 10.4% economic interest ‒ Intends to continue to hold these shares as a long-term financial investor ‒ Views fundamentals of the company as sound, and remains supportive of its strategic direction and its management Relationship unchanged; ongoing close relationship
  • 7.
    As at June30, 2017. Source: Fort Hills Energy Limited Partnership, May 2017. Update Fort Hills First Oil Expected End of 2017 • Construction >92% complete • 4 of 6 areas turned over to Operations ‒ Utilities >95% complete ‒ Secondary Extraction first oil facilities 81% complete • >90% operations personnel hired • First froth production in September to advance the commissioning process and de-risk the project 6
  • 8.
    Update Returning Cash toShareholders • Increased the dividend ‒ Annualized dividend of $0.20/share ‒ Payment quarterly • Shift in dividend policy to align with cyclical nature of our business ‒ Variable component, at the Board’s discretion 7
  • 9.
    500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 125 130 135140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 C$Million HCC Coal Price US$/t Update Significant Earnings Potential Coal EBITDA & Free Cash Flow Potential* * Non-GAAP financial measures. See ‘Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures’ in our quarterly results news releases for additional information. Annualized EBITDA and free cash flow generating capacity of the coal business unit in two scenarios. The “mid-point” scenario assumes the mid-points of 2017 production and cost guidance, and realized coal prices equal to 92% of benchmark. The “Upside” scenario assumes production at the high end of our 2017 guidance range, operating costs at the low end of the range, and realized coal prices equal to 96% of the benchmark. “Cash flow” refers to free cash flow after capitalized stripping and sustaining capital. Outputs are based on an assumed Canadian dollar to US dollar exchange rate of 1.26, 2017 plan fuel costs, and numerous other assumptions. These assumptions are subject to various risks and uncertainties that may cause results to vary materially from those depicted above. Please see the Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Information for more information. 2017 Guidance Mid-Point Upside Coal Production (Mt) 27.25 27.5 Unit Cost of Sales (C$/t): Site 51 49 Transportation 36 35 Unit Cost of Sales (C$/t) 87 84 Capitalized Stripping (C$M) 430 430 Sustaining Capital (C$M) 140 140 8
  • 10.
    Update Summary • Generating strongfree cash flow • Benefiting from the right commodity mix at the right time • Three months to first oil at Fort Hills • Solid financial position • High quality organic growth options 9
  • 11.
    Zinc Business September 19,2017 Dale Andres, Senior Vice President, Base Metals
  • 12.
    Zinc Business Forward LookingInformation Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include management’s expectations that Teck’s zinc business has excellent growth and extension opportunities, mineral resource and mine life estimates, Red Dog 2017 guidance, projected Red Dog throughput and zinc grade, projection that the Red Dog VIP2 Project will increase mill throughput by approximately 15%, potential for mine life extension at Antamina, expectations of continuous improvement at Trail, the potential for future zinc development, including but not limited to regarding the Teena and San Nicolas properties, the expectations regarding potential life extension options and world-class new mine opportunities. These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in Teck’s public filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, general business and economic conditions, assumptions regarding the receipt of regulatory and governmental approvals for our development projects and other operations, the accuracy of our resources estimates and the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, conditions in financial markets, the future financial performance of the company, assumption that the VIP2 Project operates as anticipated, positive results from the studies on our expansion projects, our ongoing relations with our employees and business partners and joint venturers. Reserve and resource life estimates assume the mine life of longest lived resource in the relevant commodity is achieved, assumes production at planned rates and in some cases development of as yet undeveloped projects. Management’s expectations of mine life are based on the current planned production rates and assume that all resources described in this presentation are developed. Certain forward-looking statements are based on assumptions disclosed in footnotes to the relevant slides. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions (including with respect to the size, grade and recoverability of mineral reserves and resources), unanticipated operational or development difficulties union labour disputes, political risk, social unrest, changes in our credit ratings or the financial market in general, unanticipated increases in costs to construct our development projects, difficulty in obtaining permits, inability to address concerns regarding permits of environmental impact assessments, changes in tax benefits or tax rates, and changes or deterioration in general economic conditions. We will not achieve the maximum mine lives of our projects, or be able to mine all reserves at our projects, or develop our projects, if we do not obtain relevant permits for our operations. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions, risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov). The Red Dog and Antamina scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. 2
  • 13.
    Zinc Business Attractive ZincBusiness • World’s largest net zinc miner – World’s second largest zinc mine at Red Dog – Rising zinc production at Antamina • Efficient, integrated smelting operation at Trail – Increasing production and stability • Excellent growth and extension opportunities – Mill throughput increases – Exploration and new development projects 3
  • 14.
    Zinc Business Safety isa Core Value 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD Frequency(per200,000hoursworked) High Potential Incident Frequency Our Key Focus Areas 1. High Potential Risk Control 2. Occupational Health & Hygiene 3. Courageous Safety Leadership Significant Improvement High Potential Incidents: 45% reduction Lost Time Injuries: 15% reduction 4
  • 15.
    Zinc Business World’s LargestNet Zinc Miner 583 198 0 250 500 750 ZincProduction(kt) 2 Red Dog1 Reserve Mine Life to 2031 Reserves: 51 Mt Resources: Indicated 6 Mt Inferred 26 Mt Antamina1 Reserve Mine Life to 2028 Reserves: 247 Mt Resources: Measured 19 Mt Indicated 138 Mt Inferred 431 Mt Top 10 Zinc Mines by Production (2016) Source: Wood Mackenzie 1. Mineral Reserves and Resources as at December 31, 2016, as disclosed in our latest Annual Information Form available on SEDAR. 2. Our 22.5% share of Antamina zinc production was 45 kt. 5
  • 16.
    Zinc Business Very CompetitiveCost Position Low cost zinc production… By-product credits significantly reduce unit costs - 0.20 0.40 0.60 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 UnitCosts(US$/lb) …with significant quarterly variation at Red Dog1 1. Average quarterly unit cost (2013-2017) before royalties, based on Teck ‘s reported financials. • Seasonality of unit costs largely due to lead sales during the shipping season • Zinc is a by-product credit at Antamina and accounted for in the Copper Business Unit 6
  • 17.
    Zinc Business Stable OperatingCosts at Red Dog • Low total cash costs, at US$0.45/lb in 2016 • C1 cash costs down US$0.09/lb in 2016 vs. 2015 ‒ Operating cost reductions ‒ Treatment charges lower ‒ Higher lead price • Royalty costs are up as a function of higher zinc prices ‒ NANA royalty to 35% in October 2017 $0.00 $0.20 $0.40 $0.60 Operating Costs Transportation Costs Treatment Charges By-Product Credits C1 Cash Costs Royalty Total Cash Costs 2016 0.45 0.19 0.09 0.20 0.22 0.19 0.26 Based on Teck’s reported financials. $0.00 $0.20 $0.40 $0.60 Operating Costs Transportation Costs Treatment Charges By-Product Credits C1 Cash Costs Royalty Total Cash Costs 2015 0.21 0.10 0.23 0.19 0.47 0.35 0.12 US$/lb US$/lb 7
  • 18.
    Zinc Business Red Dogis a Consistent Performer • 2017 guidance updated to 525-550 kt zinc metal contained in concentrate − Mine sequencing changes at Aqqaluk − Additional feed of higher grade but complex Qanaiyaq ore • Improvement and extension projects − VIP2 Project to increase mill throughput by ~15% − Drilling program at Aktigiruq 5 10 15 20 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018- 2020 2 3 4 5 Grade(%) Throughput(Mt) Throughput to Help Offset Grade Decline Throughput Zinc Grade 8
  • 19.
    Tailings & WaterManagement - Staged tailings dam construction - Major focus on water management and treatment Qanaiyaq - Started production in 2017 - Optimizing blend strategy VIP2 - Increase mill throughput - Maintain mine life - Lower cost structure Mine Life Extension - Near term – Road access & drilling - Longer term - Underground development and new tailings facility Zinc Business Preparing Red Dog for the Future 9
  • 20.
    Zinc Business Rising ZincProduction at Antamina • Large zinc production increase − >50% in 2017 vs. the last 5 years − Quarterly zinc production profile varies based on mine sequencing • Mine life extension studies progressing - 20 40 60 80 100 120 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018- 2020 Production(kt) Copper & Zinc Production Zinc Copper Guidance numbers are based on the mid-point of production guidance. Production numbers reflect Teck’s 22.5% share. - 5 10 15 20 25 Q1-13 Q2-13 Q3-13 Q4-13 Q1-14 Q2-14 Q3-14 Q4-14 Q1-15 Q2-15 Q3-15 Q4-15 Q1-16 Q2-16 Q3-16 Q4-16 Q1-17 Q2-17 Production(kt) Quarterly Zinc Production 10
  • 21.
    •High quality, localsource of concentrate for Trail Operations •Significant focus on drilling programs − Improved feed grades in 2017 − Additional drilling underway to improve 2018 mine plan confidence Zinc Business Successful Drilling at Pend Oreille 11
  • 22.
    Zinc Business Driving ContinuousImprovement at Trail • Annual production records set in 2016 − Zinc: 312 kt − Lead: 99 kt − Silver: 24 Moz • Red Dog is an important long term feed source • Investing in second new acid plant − Improved reliability and stability • Margin improvement programs: − Focus on cost management − Improve efficiency − Introduce value-added products 80 90 100 110 120 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 %Comparedwith2012Base Solid Production Performance Zinc Lead Guidance numbers are based on the mid-point of our production guidance ranges.12
  • 23.
    Zinc Business Innovation aCore Driver of Long-Term Value Manage Improve Grow • Mine-to-mill initiatives including stockpile blending • Blast movement monitoring • Sensor-based ore sorting at Red Dog • VIP2 Project • Exploration and underground development Broad portfolio of existing, emerging & future technologies 13
  • 24.
    Zinc Business Our SustainabilityStrategy Community Water Our People Biodiversity Energy and Climate Change Air Community - Northwest Arctic Borough PILT Agreement at Red Dog Water - Trail groundwater treatment plant - Optimizing water discharge at Red Dog Air - Fugitive dust emission reductions at new Trail smelter recycle building 14
  • 25.
    Zinc Business Significant UndevelopedResource In Construction Pre-Sanction Medium-Term Growth Options Red Dog Satellite Deposits Cirque Trail #2 Acid Plant Red Dog VIP2 Teena San Nicolás (Cu-Zn) Antamina Brownfield Future Options 1. Rox Resources, June 1, 2016 PR Inferred Mineral Resource estimate in accordance to requirements and guidelines of the JORC code. Lens Tonnes (Mt) Zn (%) Pb (%) Zn+Pb (%) Main 45 12.0 1.8 13.7 Lower 14 8.2 1.2 9.4 Total1 58 11.1 1.6 12.7 • Exploring to test continuity and resource limits, and preliminary development studies 15
  • 26.
    Zinc Business Near TermDevelopment Potential In Construction Pre-Sanction Medium-Term Growth Options Red Dog Satellite Deposits Cirque Trail #2 Acid Plant Red Dog VIP2 Teena San Nicolás (Cu-Zn) Antamina Brownfield Future Options Francisco I. Madero Fresnillo SAN NICOLAS La Negra Cozamin Santa Barbara Platosa Penasquito Tayahua Charcas Bilbao Real de Angeles Pitarrilla Velardena Del Toro Nuestra Senora Torreon San Luis Potosi Zn/Pb mine Zn mine Zn/Pb project Pb/Zn smelter Gulf of Mexico 0 250km 500 km Cu/Zn project Resources1 Tonnes (Mt) Zn (%) Cu (%) Indicated 92 1.7 1.2 Inferred 11 1.0 1.2 • High grade, low C1 cost Cu-Zn mine • Competitive capital cost • EIA and permit submission for Q1 2019 • Top 10 zinc producer in early years 1. Mineral Reserves and Resources as at December 31, 2016, as disclosed in our latest Annual Information Form available on SEDAR.16
  • 27.
    Zinc Business Increasing Valuein the Zinc Business • Low cost zinc production • Driving results through operating excellence • Targeted improvements to enhance value • Life extension options at core assets • World-class new mine opportunities 17
  • 28.
    Zinc Market September 19,2017 Andrew Stonkus, Senior Vice President, Marketing and Logistics
  • 29.
    Zinc Market Forward LookingInformation Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to a projected zinc deficit, zinc inventory and pricing projections, smelter production and capacity projections, potential expansion of the zinc market and consistency and reliability of Red Dog concentrate. These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially. The forward-looking statements in these slides and accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions including, but not limited to, assumptions about zinc production, zinc use, smelter production and capacity, general business and economic conditions, the accuracy of our Red Dog reserve estimates and geological results and the future performance of Red Dog. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, changes in commodity and power prices, changes in market demand for zinc, acts of foreign governments, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions, inaccurate zinc market assumptions, unanticipated operational difficulties, and changes or deterioration in general economic conditions. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions, risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov). 2
  • 30.
    Zinc Market Producing Concentratesand Custom Zinc Metal Zinc in concentrate Tailor-made zinc jumbos with galvanized sheet steel 3
  • 31.
    (1,500) (1,000) (500) 0 500 1,000 1,500 2015 2016 20172018 2019 2020 Others China Change Antamina Glencore India Dugald River Namibia/S.A. thousandtonnescontained Source: Teck Mine Production Growth Insufficient to Balance Market Imported Spot TCs at Historical Lows 0 50 100 150 200 250 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12 Jan-13 Jul-13 Jan-14 Jul-14 Jan-15 Jul-15 Jan-16 Jul-16 Jan-17 Jul-17 ImportedTC,$/dmt Source: Teck , CNIA, Wood Mac, NBS Projected Deficit Zinc Market Zinc Concentrate Deficit Since 2015 4
  • 32.
    Zinc Market Planned ProjectsWon’t Meet Long-Term Demand 8 10 12 14 16 18 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Mt Secondary (Net of Smelter Losses) Mine Production Base Demand Teck Zinc Mine Production Peaks in 2020 Existing and Fully Committed Mines Demand Scenarios • Low Growth (2.3%): 4.3 Mt of uncommitted projects needed by 2025 • High Growth (3.0%): 5.2 Mt of uncommitted projects needed by 2025 Source: Teck, Wood Mackenzie 0 1 2 3 4 5 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Mehdiabad Ozernoe Kipushi Selwyn Tala Hamza Citronen Pavlovskoye Dairi Shalkiya Restart Aripuana Buenavista Korbalikhinsky Woodlawn Asmara Other Small <50kmt Uncommitted Projects Insufficient Mt 5
  • 33.
    Monthly Chinese MinedZinc Production Zinc Market Chinese Mined Zinc Production at 5-Year Low Source: CNIA Down 11% m/m in July 2017 & down 6% y/y YTD 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Jan-06 Jun-06 Nov-06 Apr-07 Sep-07 Feb-08 Jul-08 Dec-08 May-09 Oct-09 Mar-10 Aug-10 Jan-11 Jun-11 Nov-11 Apr-12 Sep-12 Feb-13 Jul-13 Dec-13 May-14 Oct-14 Mar-15 Aug-15 Jan-16 Jun-16 Nov-16 Apr-17 ThousandsDMT Plotted to July 2017 6
  • 34.
    Environmental/Safety Inspections Constraining ZincMine Production Source: Antaike, BGRIMM, Teck 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 kt Jan-May 2013 Jan-May 2014 Jan-May 2015 Jan-May 2016 Jan-May 2017 Estimated Mine Growth Rarely Achieved Zinc Market Limited Chinese Response to Higher Prices Source: CNIA/NBS 100 350 270 180 300 360 200 -630 60 150 -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 kt Early-year estimate Year end estimate 7
  • 35.
    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Jan-13 Mar-13 May-13 Jul-13 Sep-13 Nov-13 Jan-14 Mar-14 May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15 May-15 Jul-15 Sep-15 Nov-15 Jan-16 Mar-16 May-16 Jul-16 Sep-16 Nov-16 Jan-17 Mar-17 May-17 Jul-17 Source: China Customs ZinccontainedthouMt •Massive destocking in 2016 • Year-to-date to June 2017, stocks risen 35% • Concentrate inventories currently at historic lows Chinese Zinc Concentrate Imports Zinc Market Chinese Concentrate Imports Below Previous Highs 8
  • 36.
    300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Jan-13 Mar-13 May-13 Jul-13 Sep-13 Nov-13 Jan-14 Mar-14 May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15 May-15 Jul-15 Sep-15 Nov-15 Jan-16 Mar-16 May-16 Jul-16 Sep-16 Nov-16 Jan-17 Mar-17 May-17 Jul-17 ZinccontainedthouMt Source: NBS/CNIA • Down2% y/y YTD July – Down 6% MoM • Cuts to Chinese refined production March-June (~100-170 kmt) • Improvement in spot TCs has improved Chinese smelter profitability • Expect concentrate stock draw down as winter inventory not built Chinese Smelter Production Zinc Market Chinese Smelter Production Constrained 9
  • 37.
    Zinc Market Chinese ZincSmelter Cut in 1H 2017 Source: SMM Smelter Utilization Rates Declining 0 20 40 60 80 100 Jan-12 Jun-12 Nov-12 Apr-13 Sep-13 Feb-14 Jul-14 Dec-14 May-15 Oct-15 Mar-16 Aug-16 Jan-17 % Overall smelter utilization rate Large smelters (>200kt) Medium-sized smelters (100-200kt) Small smelters (20-100kt) Demand for Zinc Metal Imports Increasing 754 1,131 1,201 1,295 1,237 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 kt China zinc production Demand for imports Source: Antaike, BGRIMM, Teck 10
  • 38.
    Zinc Market China isImportant to the Zinc Market 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Mine Production Smelter Production Demand kt China Europe N.America ROW Supply • 40% of global mine production • 45% of global smelter production • 32% of global coated sheet production ‒ Grew from 20% in 2010 Demand • 48% of global refined demand China Has a Significant Impact Globally 11
  • 39.
    0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 0¢ 20¢ 40¢ 60¢ 80¢ 100¢ 120¢ 140¢ 160¢ 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 LME Stocks SHFEPrice Zinc Market Metal Inventories Close to Historical Lows 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 0¢ 50¢ 100¢ 150¢ 200¢ 250¢ 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 LME Stocks SHFE Price US¢/lb Plotted to September 8, 2017 Source: LME/SHFE • Below 2005/2006 levels, with LME and SHFE down 259 kt in 2017 • SHFE down 130 kt since March peak • Price is now reacting • May be more hidden stocks available, with some enroute to Asia Daily Zinc Prices & Stocks Stocks 12
  • 40.
    • 94% ofLME stocks in New Orleans (NOLA) • LME metal is slab zinc – 70% of US demand is from steel mills demanding customized jumbos • Majority of NOLA zinc is: – European origin – Duty unpaid (1.2%): 1.6¢ premium on $3,000/t zinc • Majority of zinc from ~2008-2010 – Concerns about condition – Has white rust, which causes high dross • Customers rejecting NOLA material Zinc Market Available LME Stocks Almost Exhausted - 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 Available Cancelled Cancelled stocks unavailable for lending/borrowing on LME contracts NOLA Cancelled Metal 13
  • 41.
    Zinc Market Pinch PointReached 0¢ 50¢ 100¢ 150¢ 200¢ 250¢ 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Jan 2014 Jan 2013 Jan 2015 Jan 2016 Jan 2017 2003 2004 2006 2007 2005 Mar 2017 Days of stocks September 7, 2017 2013 to 2017 2003 to 2007 US¢/lb Data plotted from 2000 to September 7, 2017Source: LME, SHFE, Wood Mackenzie Zinc Prices vs. Days of Reported Stocks 14
  • 42.
    Zinc Market Defending /Expanding Zinc Market Giga Steel Ultrahigh-strength & galvanizable competes well with aluminum. Source: IZA, New York State Thruway Authority, Zinc.org Continuous Galvanized Rebar High productivity process which enables coated rebar to be shaped in the field. Zinc Thermal Spray Portable technology to spray molten zinc onto a steel surface . Zinc Micro-Nutrient Fertilizer Zinc micronutrient in fertilizer well accepted and growing market. 15
  • 43.
    Zinc Market Red DogSeasonality • Operates 12 months • Ships ~ 4 months • Shipments to inventory in Canada and Europe; Direct sales to Asia • ~65% of zinc sales in second half of year • ~100% of lead sales in second half of year 21% 14% 31% 34% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Zinc Sales1 0% 1% 55% 44% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Lead Sales1 1. Average of 2010 to 2016.16
  • 44.
    Zinc Market Attractive RedDog Concentrate Quality • Low iron • Base feed for our customers • Good zinc grade • Low precious metal content (silver value: ~$15/dmt) • High zinc content; by-products valued in China • Low precious metal content (silver value: ~$250/dmt) Consistent, Reliable Supply of Zinc Concentrate Clean Lead Concentrate 17
  • 45.
    Zinc Market Red DogZinc Concentrate Sales Distribution Shows Consistency Asia 33% Canada 30% Europe 37% 2016 Asia 28% Canada 26% Europe 46% 2000 18
  • 46.
    Zinc Market Red DogLead Sales Distribution Reflects Market Evolution Asia 48% Europe 52% 2000 Asia 97% Canada 3% 2016 19
  • 47.
    Zinc Market Trail RefinedMetal Sales Primarily the United States United States 84% Asia 10% Canada 6% Zinc United States 98% Asia & Other 2% Lead 20
  • 48.
    • The “ZincGap”: outlook is for a strong market • Red Dog zinc concentrate customer base stable • Red Dog zinc concentrate quality is a base feed for our customers • Red Dog lead concentrate quality favorable in China, the largest market Zinc Market Summary 21
  • 49.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 1 September 19, 2017 Adrian King, Head of Exploration
  • 50.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 1 Forward Looking Information Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include mineral resource and exploration target estimates, exploration potential of deposits near our Red Dog mine and Aktigiruq potential to be a world class deposit. These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in Teck’s public filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, the accuracy of our geological and exploration work in respect of the exploration target estimates, the accuracy of our mineral resources estimates (including with respect to size, grade and recoverability) and the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, assumptions that future geological work will support, and be consistent with, the Aktigiruq exploration target results, assumptions regarding the representativeness of the current Aktigiruq exploration results, and assumptions regarding receipts of any required approvals. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions, results of further exploration work not supporting or being consistent with the Aktigiruq exploration target results, unanticipated operational difficulties, unanticipated operational difficulties at Red Dog, inability to realize exploration potential, conclusions of future economic or geological evaluations, difficulty in obtaining or maintaining permits, and changes or further deterioration in general economic conditions. We will not achieve the maximum mine lives of our projects, or be able to mine all reserves at our projects, if we do not obtain relevant permits relating to our plans and deterioration in economic conditions. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions, risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov). 2
  • 51.
    “The job ofour exploration department – indeed almost its sole purpose – is to provide us with new ore bodies for development when we need them, as well as maintain reserves at established mines. Whether this is done from the grassroots or through negotiations is not important. What is important is that it is done.” Norman B. Keevil, Chairman of the Board Red Dog Exploration Part 1 Providing Orebodies for Development 3
  • 52.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 1 Unique World-Class District Continuing to deliver in a premier zinc district WORLD-CLASS DISTRICT NEW RESOURCES OUTSTANDING POTENTIAL 40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Mining Anarraaq Inferred Resource¹ 19.4 Mt @ 14.4% Zn, 4.2% Pb Aktigiruq Exploration Target² 80-150 Mt @ 16-18% Zn+Pb 1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017. 2. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. 4
  • 53.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 1 40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Red Dog Creek staining noted USGS Open File “Red Dog” 3% ZnPb samples Teck (Cominco) Stakes first claims Su-Lik discovery Qanaiyaq discovery Red Dog Main discovery Landmark agreement between NANA & Cominco Aqqaluk discovery. Paalaaq discovery. Paalaaq N. discovery. Anarraaq discovery. Aktigiruq discovery. Anarraaq Extension. Anarraaq South. Production: Red Dog Main Production: Aqqaluk Production: Qanaiyaq Aktigiruq Extension ProductionActive Exploration 5
  • 54.
    • Significant land-holding •350 km2 of highly prospective NANA and State lands • Focus on enhancing resource certainty and defining future developments • Multi-year program • Multi disciplinary approach Paalaaq Su-Lik Aktigiruq Anarraaq Red Dog Main Aqqaluk Qanaiyaq Red Dog Exploration Part 1 Outstanding Exploration Potential Multiple deposits; multiple options Red Dog District (100% Teck) Red Dog Mine (Teck / NANA) Lik (Teck / Solitario) Deposits Prospects 6
  • 55.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 1 Numerous Regional Targets Paalaaq Su-Lik Aktigiruq Anarraaq Red Dog Main Aqqaluk Qanaiyaq 1. Mine Area Cluster • Qanaiyaq • Main • Aqqaluk • Paalaaq 2. Anarraaq-Aktigiruq Cluster • Variable characteristics Two major deposit clusters Red Dog District (100% Teck) Red Dog Mine (Teck / NANA) Lik (Teck / Solitario) Deposits Prospects 7
  • 56.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 1 Anarraaq-Aktigiruq Cluster Significant Intercepts Non-Significant Intercepts Too Short Non Aktigiruq Drill Collars Legend Aktigiruq Anarraaq 1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017.8
  • 57.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 1 Building a Quality Zinc Inventory Potential New GIANT system GIANT ZINC DEPOSITS +6 Mt Zn+Pb Aktigiruq ExplorationTarget1 80-150 Mt 16-18% Zn+Pb Sources: S&P Global Market Intelligence, SNL Metals & Mining Database, Teck Public Disclosures. 1. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 GradeZn+Pb% ContainedZn+Pb(Mt) 9
  • 58.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 1 Global Context of Teck’s Zinc Resources 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 GradeZn+Pb% Resource Million Tonnes Red Dog Past Production Rampura Agucha Broken Hill McArthur River GIANT ZINC DEPOSITS (+6 Mt Zn+Pb) Qanaiyaq Aqqaluk Well Positioned; World Class Teena Anarraaq Paalaaq Su-Lik Hermosa Sources: S&P Global Market Intelligence, SNL Metals & Mining Database, Teck Public Disclosures. 1. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. Aktigiruq Exploration Target1 80-150 Mt 16-18% Zn+Pb 10
  • 59.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 1 Thank You & See You at Red Dog The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. For further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and Technical Report (43-101) dated Feb 21, 2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. For further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and Technical Report (43-101) dated February 21, 2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com
  • 60.
    Red Dog Operations September20, 2017 Henri Letient, General Manager, Red Dog
  • 61.
    Red Dog Operations ForwardLooking Information Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to our Red Dog production guidance, progress in addressing production challenges, projected mill feed rate and projected benefits of VIP2 project. These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in Teck’s public filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, general business and economic conditions, the supply and demand for, deliveries of, and the level and volatility of prices of, zinc, our costs of production and production and productivity levels, as well as those of our competitors, power prices, assumptions that the VIP2 project operates as anticipated, the accuracy of our reserve estimates (including with respect to size, grade and recoverability) and the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, conditions in financial markets, the future financial performance of the company, our ability to attract and retain skilled staff, our ability to procure equipment and operating supplies, positive results from the studies on our expansion projects, our ability to obtain permits for our operations and expansions, our ongoing relations with our employees and business partners. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, changes in commodity prices, changes in market demand for our products, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions, unanticipated operational difficulties (including failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations, cost escalation, unavailability of materials and equipment, government action or delays in the receipt of government approvals, industrial disturbances or other job action, adverse weather conditions and unanticipated events related to health, safety and environmental matters), changes in the financial market in general, unanticipated increases in costs to construct our development projects, difficulty in obtaining permits or securing transportation for our products, inability to address concerns regarding permits of environmental impact assessments, changes in tax benefits or tax rates, and changes or deterioration in general economic conditions. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions, risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov). 2
  • 62.
    Overview Development History Operations Sustainability &People Looking Forward Red Dog Operations Agenda 3
  • 63.
    Red Dog Operations OurVision With strong foundations in a world class zinc district, we maintain our position as a long term low cost producer in the global zinc market. Together with our partner NANA1, we operate responsibly by creating a safe and sustainable environment for our people and the region. 1. Northwest Alaska Native Association (NANA).4
  • 64.
    • 1,000 kmnorthwest of Anchorage, Alaska • 240 km north of Arctic Circle • Western end of Brooks Range • Began operations in 1989 Red Dog Operations Remote Location & Access 5
  • 65.
    Remote; Extreme Climate •~100 day shipping season • ~120 day exploration season Deposits • Main (mined out) • Aqqaluk (2010 start) • Qanaiyaq (2017 start) Current Reserves1 • 50.9 Mt @ 15.0% Zn, 4.2% Pb, 76 g/t Ag 1. As at December 31, 2016. Please see our latest Annual Information Form for additional details. Red Dog Operations Operating North of the Arctic Circle 6
  • 66.
    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Thousandtonnes Thousandtonnes Ore Milled PerYear (Left Axis) Zinc Metal (Right Axis) Red Dog Operations Zinc Production has Grown PRI VIP1 Ore Milled and Zinc Metal1 1. PRI means Production Rate Increase. VIP means Value Improvement Project. Original design throughput rate 7
  • 67.
    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Red Dog Operations LowerZinc Grades; Consistent Recoveries Ore Milled Per Year (kt Profile) Zinc Metal (kt Profile) Zinc Grades & Recoveries 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Recovery(%) Grade(%) Zinc Grade (Left Axis) Zinc Recovery (Right Axis) 8
  • 68.
    Red Dog Operations LeadProduction has Grown 1. PRI means Production Rate Increase. VIP means Value Improvement Project. Ore Milled and Lead Metal1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Thousandtonnes Thousandtonnes Ore Milled Per Year (Left Axis) Lead Metal (Right Axis) PRI VIP1 9
  • 69.
    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Red Dog Operations LowerLead Grades; Consistent Recoveries Ore Milled Per Year (kt Profile) Lead Metal (kt Profile) Lead Grades & Recoveries 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Recovery(%) Grade(%) Lead Grade (Left Axis) Lead Recovery (Right Axis) 10
  • 70.
    Late 1992: Installationof Ball Mill 1 and Ball Mill 2, which increased throughput 1994-1995: Installation of additional Pb and Zn columns, which improved Pb and Zn recoveries 1997: Commissioning of “Production Rate Increase”, PRI, including SAG Mill 3, Ball Mill 4, some Zn flotation capacity, new reagent building, and the gyratory crusher 1998: Commissioning of additional Pb flotation capacity 2001: Commissioning of “Value Improvement Project”, VIP, including Zn thickener, powerhouse expansion and more Zn flotation capacity 2007: Commissioning of the prefloat Jameson Cell 2012: Commissioning of zinc IsaMills Red Dog Operations Many Improvements Projects 11
  • 71.
    Red Dog Operations KeyProduction Statistics 2014 2015 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 2017 Guidance Additional Guidance Tonnes milled (kt) 4,300 4,026 4,250 1,019 1,117 Zinc Grade (%) 16.6 16.7 17.1 14.7 14.2 Recovery (%) 83.3 84.2 82.8 80.3 80.6 Concentrate (kt) 1,060 1,014 1,052 221 236 Production (kt) 596 567 583 120 128 525-550 5 Year: 475-550 Lead: Grade (%) 4.4 4.8 4.9 5.5 5.2 Recovery (%) 65.3 60.7 56.0 51.6 54.7 Concentrate (kt) 219 212 228 53 60 Production (kt) 123 118 122 29 32 110-115 3 Year: 85-115 Total Metal (kt) 719 685 705 149 160 12
  • 72.
    Red Dog Operations AddressingProduction Challenges Focus Area Challenge Progress Qanaiyaq (Qan) Plan requires a certain feed rate to meet LOM production and metallurgy needs • Variable metallurgical performance • Increased selenium levels in pit lake and tailings • Reduced Qan mill feed % & modified waste rock management ‒ Allowed mill performance to return to forecast levels ‒ Se levels stabilized • Slowly returning Qan % to required limit to meet production and maintain blend through life of mine Mine Plan Sequencing Small sequencing changes can have significant year-over- year production impacts • Corrective pit sequencing actions to account for production challenges in late 2016 has impacted 2017 forecast • Correcting H1 2017 production challenges is altering previous 5- year production profile • Localized pit design change: addressed slope stability issue and resulted in higher grade ore available in 2017 • Sequencing optimization in progress to maintain steady concentrate production 13
  • 73.
    Red Dog Operations VIP2Aims to Optimize Value Capture • Throughput increases by average 15%, while mine life is maintained • Lower unit cost allows for lower cut-off and direct use of marginal ore ‒ Increased marginal ore expected from 2020; would be wasted without VIP2 (+6 Mt ore) • Requires tailings dam raise ‒ Permitting, lift configuration & CapEx studies in progress • Full NANA support Sanction decision September 2017 14
  • 74.
    Overview Development History Operations Sustainability &People Looking Forward Red Dog Operations Agenda 15
  • 75.
    Red Dog Operations Workingwith Indigenous Peoples in the Arctic Celebrated 25 years of operations in 2014 & 25 years of concentrate shipping in 2015 Unique agreement between Teck, as operator, and NANA, who own the land Benefits: • >US$1 billion in proceeds for NANA from the mine • More than half of employees are NANA shareholders • Protecting subsistence way of life • Long life, world class zinc mine 16
  • 76.
    Red Dog Operations FirstDiscovery 1955-1970: First Recognition • 1955: Irv Tailleur (USGS) visits Ferric Creek • 1968: Pilot Bob Baker notes Red Dog Creek staining & informs Tailleur • 1970: Tailleur USGS open file “Red Dog” 3% Pb+Zn samples 1973: Staking Withdrawal for 5 years; Wilderness Classification • 1974: Sen. T. Stevens funds mineral assessment study 1975: Government-Sponsored Study • Press release on August 30, 1975 Naturally occurring Iron oxide staining in drainage; similar to Red Dog before discovery. Old-school frontier prospecting & mapping period 17
  • 77.
    Red Dog Operations ExplorationCompanies Take Action 1975: Teck (Cominco) and others react • Teck on site within two weeks • Recognize potential • Stake first claims September 8, 1975 1976: USBM publish results • Float / in-situ mineralization of up to 14% Zn, 3-4% Pb, 2-3 oz/t Ag • Anomalous geochem over 3,000 x 9,000 ft area 1976: Su and Lik discovered • Showings and Silt Geochem • GCO stakes Lik; Cominco stakes Su. 1976: Land status • NANA apply to BLM to establish ownership of Red Dog area Showing Stream sediment anomalies Red Dog Creek 18
  • 78.
    Resolution of competingtitle claims critical • NANA leaders visited other Teck operations 1981: Letter of Intent between NANA and Teck • Drill deposit on 400’ centres • Before land status was resolved 1982: Landmark agreement between NANA and Teck • Teck to operate under a lease agreement • Ultimately schedule to 50:50 profit share Red Dog Operations Teck Partnership with NANA 19
  • 79.
    People: • Arctic discovery,operational experience • Technical teams: persistent, driven Technical: • Old school frontier prospecting • Conventional silt geochem, mapping, drilling Opportunity Recognition & Capacity to Execute • Quick to act and understand significance • Dogged pursuit in face of legal hurdles • Significant Senior Management support Community Engagement • Proactive approach well ahead of its time • Established foundation for a long-term successful partnership Red Dog Operations Critical Success Factors 1978-1984 20
  • 80.
    • Initial developmentbegan 1986, with the installation of a shallow water dock and small staging area at the port site • Major construction on the road & mine site started 1987 • Mill largely built in modules in the Philippines, transported by barge to the coast and module movers to site • Construction completed November 1989 Red Dog Operations >30-Year Development History 21
  • 81.
    • Move upto 2000 tons • 200 independently driven wheels • 3 x 500 HP engines • 2-5 mph Red Dog Operations Module Transporters 22
  • 82.
    • Powerhouse module71’ x 68’ x 50’ high -> weight 800 tons • Flotation module 114’ x 64’ x 75’ high -> weight 1,600 tons Red Dog Operations Powerhouse Module in Transit 23
  • 83.
  • 84.
    Overview Development History Operations Sustainability &People Looking Forward Red Dog Operations Agenda 25
  • 85.
    Red Dog Operations MineArea Deposits Structurally thrust-stacked systems Structural slices of one larger system Originally along north-trending corridor Deposits can be blind under younger / older sequences 500 m Qanaiyaq Main Aqqaluk Paalaaq 26
  • 86.
  • 87.
    Red Dog Operations MobileProduction Equipment Fleet • 10 Haul Trucks (777D/F 100 Ton) • 5 Loaders (993K) • 4 Excavators (various sizes) • 4 Dozers (D9/D10) • 2 Graders • 3 DML Drills 28
  • 88.
    Primary: Gyratory Crusher •42” x 65” • 300 kW / 400 hp • Manufactured by Allis-Chalmers • 1,090 tonnes / 1,200 tons per hour Backup: Jaw Crusher • 42” x 60” • 150 kW / 200 hp • Manufactured by Fuller-Taylor • 635 tonnes / 700 tons per hour Red Dog Operations Two Crushers 29
  • 89.
  • 90.
    Red Dog Operations GrindingEquipment • Primary Grinding – 3 SAG Mills • Secondary/Tertiary Grinding – 4 Ball Mills • Regrind o 3 Tower Mills (Lead circuit) o 2 IsaMills (Zinc circuit) SAG Mill # Manufacturer Diamater (ft) Length (ft) Motor (kW/hp) Media Size (in) 1 & 2 Fuller 22 8.5 1,500 / 2,000 4 & 5 3 Fuller 22 8.5 2,000 / 2,650 4 & 5 Ball Mill # Manufacturer Diamater (ft) Length (ft) Motor (kW/hp) Media Size (in) 1 & 2 Marcy 12 12 930 / 1,250 1 3 Marcy 10.7 15 750 / 1,000 1 4 Fuller 16 18.5 2,250 / 3,000 2.75 Tower Mill # Manufacturer Motor (kW/hp) Media Size (in) 1, 2, 3 MPSI 350 / 450 0.5 IsaMill M5000 Manufacturer Motor (kW/hp) Media Size (mm) Rougher Xstrata 1,500 / 2,000 5 Retreat Xstrata 1,500 / 2,000 3 31
  • 91.
    • Prefloat Circuit •Lead Circuit • Zinc Circuit Prefloat Circuit # Of Cells Cell Type Manufacturer Dimensions Rotor/Stator Rougher 6 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3 OK50 Cleaner 1 Jameson Glencore 18' diameter - Lead Circuit # Of Cells Cell Type Manufacturer Dimensions Rotor/Stator Rougher 10 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3 OK50 Scavenger 5 Conventional Outokumpu 16 m3 OK16 Primary Column 1 Column AG&P 13.5' ft dia, 42' tall - Secondary Columns 4 Column AG&P 9' ft dia, 38' tall - Zinc Circuit # Of Cells Cell Type Manufacturer Dimensions Rotor/Stator Rougher 12 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3 OK50 Cleaner 17 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3 OK50/OK38 Cleaner Columns 6 Column CPT 12' ft dia, 52' tall - Retreat 15 Conventional Outokumpu 50 m3 OK50/OK38 Retreat Columns 2 Column CPT 12' ft dia, 52' tall - Red Dog Operations Flotation Equipment 32
  • 92.
    Lead Thickener • 60’diameter • 15.5’ height • Manufactured by Eimco Zinc Thickener • 140’ diameter • 12.5’ height • Manufactured by Eimco Filter Presses • Lead circuit: 1 Lasta filter press • Zinc circuit: 4 Lasta filter presses • Manufactured by Ingersoll-Rand • 100 psi air pressure during operation Red Dog Operations Dewatering Equipment 33
  • 93.
    8 diesel generators 5.0megawatt per unit 24.5 megawatt needed 40,000 gallons of diesel fuel/day Engine cooling used to heat the buildings Red Dog Operations Power Generation Equipment 34
  • 94.
  • 95.
    Red Dog Operations SeasonalPort Operations Each shipping season (~100 days; July to late October): • Services 22-26 vessels & 3-4 barges • Ships out: ‒ >1M wmt Zn con ‒ >200K wmt Pb con • Brings in: ‒ ~1,500 containers ‒ 18-20M gallons of fuel ‒ >40 kt of freight 36
  • 96.
    Red Dog Operations Agenda Overview DevelopmentHistory Operations Sustainability & People Looking Forward 37
  • 97.
    Red Dog Operations Safetyis a Core Value 38
  • 98.
    More than halfof employees are NANA shareholders • 447 regular (52% NANA) • 65 seasonal & temporary (93% NANA) Committed to 100% NANA shareholder employment at Red Dog Red Dog Operations Partnering with NANA on Employment & Training 39
  • 99.
    Pre-Employment (Elementary &High School) • Career Awareness (10 schools; 60 students) • Job Shadow (10 schools; 60 students) Summer Student & Intern Program Post Secondary Scholarships • 4 year degree & vocational/technical programs • Aqqaluk Trust Fund • University of Alaska Red Dog Operations Providing Educational Opportunities 40
  • 100.
    Red Dog Operations Environmental,Health, Safety & Community Policy Key is ‘PIC’, which is our commitment to: • Prevent pollution and reduce waste • Continuously Improve identification of environmental, health, and safety risks and eliminate, isolate, or mitigate the risks that could injure or harm people, the environment, local communities, or subsistence resources • Comply with all environmental, health and safety laws, regulations, permits, and other environmental, health, safety, and community commitments 41
  • 101.
    66 Permits 44 Bodiesof Regulation 17 Agreements 23 Work Plans 5 Approvals 9 Standards 4 Court Orders ~3,000 Compliance Requirements >28,000 Tasks Annually Red Dog Operations Extensive Environmental Requirements 42
  • 102.
    ~3,000 ft (1,000m) RedDog Operations Extensive Site Water Management 43
  • 103.
  • 104.
    “Ten years ofaquatic surveys have demonstrated that aquatic productivity in the Main Stem has increased from pre- mining conditions due to effective water management practices and treatment.” -Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, March 2006 Red Dog Operations Effective Water Management 45
  • 105.
    Red Dog Operations ProtectingSubsistence Lifestyle 46
  • 106.
    Involved In: • Operationsoverview • Construction activities • Exploration activities • Mine water discharge • Drinking water issues • Fish studies • Air quality • Fugitive dust prevention • Caribou • Marine mammals • Shipping season • Major projects • Closure planning Red Dog Operations Formed Subsistence Committee 47
  • 107.
    Red Dog Operations RespectingSubsistence Lifestyle 48
  • 108.
    Red Dog Operations SignificantCommunity Engagement 49
  • 109.
    Village Wild SeedCollection Program • Collaborating with NANA and the State of Alaska Plant Material Center • Pilot program to determine seed availability and collection potential • Seeds to be used for reclamation at Red Dog Red Dog Operations Advancing Community Development 50
  • 110.
    Red Dog Operations Agenda Overview DevelopmentHistory Operations Sustainability & People Looking Forward 51
  • 111.
    Minex integration: • Fullyintegrated Exploration, MinEx and Mine Geology team • Strategic alignment with business unit Focused on: • 2nd generation mapping • Geotechnical and Geomet support • Geological research and modeling • MineEx resource delineation - conversion • Resource expansion at Anarraaq • Resource potential of Aktigiruq / Wulik • New district discoveries • LOM resource potential Red Dog Operations Investing for Success 52
  • 112.
    Red Dog Operations ExcellentExtension Potential Focusing on near-mine & district satellite areas, particularly: • Anarraaq - new mineral resource • Aktigiruq - 18 km drill program Lik Su Aktigiruq Anarraaq Aqqaluk Paalaaq Main Qanaiyaq ~15 km 53
  • 113.
    Red Dog Operations Strongfoundations in a world class zinc district  Great partnership with NANA  Maintaining steady output through variations in ore quality & grades  Challenging environment with limited shipping window; history of meeting these challenges well  Focus on people, emphasizing local hire and development  Protecting the environment and the subsistence lifestyle is paramount 54
  • 114.
    Red Dog Operations ClosingRemarks Thank you for visiting Red Dog 55
  • 115.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 September 20, 2017 Adrian King, Head of Exploration
  • 116.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Forward Looking Information Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in other provinces (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include mineral resource and exploration target estimates, exploration potential of deposits near our Red Dog mine and Aktigiruq potential to be a world class deposit and the value delivered by our exploration efforts. These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially, which are described in Teck’s public filings available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov). In addition, the forward-looking statements in these slides and accompanying oral presentation are based on assumptions regarding, including, but not limited to, the accuracy of our geological and exploration work in respect of the exploration target estimates, the accuracy of our mineral resources estimates (including with respect to size, grade and recoverability) and the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based, assumptions that future geological work will support, and be consistent with, the Aktigiruq exploration target results, assumptions regarding the representativeness of the current Aktigiruq exploration results, and assumptions regarding receipts of any required approvals. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions, results of further exploration work not supporting or being consistent with the Aktigiruq exploration target results, unanticipated operational difficulties, unanticipated operational difficulties at Red Dog, inability to realize exploration potential, conclusions of future economic or geological evaluations, difficulty in obtaining or maintaining permits, and changes or further deterioration in general economic conditions. We will not achieve the maximum mine lives of our projects, or be able to mine all reserves at our projects, if we do not obtain relevant permits relating to our plans and deterioration in economic conditions. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws. Further information concerning assumptions, risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business can be found in our most recent Annual Information Form, as well as subsequent filings of our management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly results, all filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov). 2
  • 117.
    Providing Orebodies forDevelopment Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District 40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production Advancing District Understanding Resources for the Future Red Dog Exploration Part 2 Agenda 3
  • 118.
    “The job ofour exploration department – indeed almost its sole purpose – is to provide us with new ore bodies for development when we need them, as well as maintain reserves at established mines. Whether this is done from the grassroots or through negotiations is not important. What is important is that it is done.” Norman B. Keevil, Chairman of the Board Red Dog Exploration Part 2 Providing Orebodies for Development 4
  • 119.
    Providing Orebodies forDevelopment Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District 40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production Advancing District Understanding Resources for the Future Red Dog Exploration Part 2 Agenda 5
  • 120.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Unique World-Class District Continuing to deliver in a premier zinc district WORLD-CLASS DISTRICT NEW RESOURCES OUTSTANDING POTENTIAL 40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Mining Anarraaq Inferred Resource¹ 19.4 Mt @ 14.4% Zn, 4.2% Pb Aktigiruq Exploration Target² 80-150 Mt @ 16-18% Zn+Pb 1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017. 2. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. 6
  • 121.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Location & Setting Best belt, large high-grade deposits • Targeting the best zinc belts and the largest deposits • Red Dog district located in the Brooks Range on the western margin of North America • Black shale Sediment Hosted Massive Sulphide deposits • Deposits are distinctly higher grade relative to other basins along the western margin of North America Anchorage 7
  • 122.
    • Significant land-holding •350 km2 of highly prospective NANA and State lands • Focus on enhancing resource certainty and defining future developments • Multi-year program • Multi disciplinary approach Paalaaq Su-Lik Aktigiruq Anarraaq Red Dog Main Aqqaluk Qanaiyaq Red Dog Exploration Part 2 Outstanding Exploration Potential Multiple deposits; multiple options Red Dog District (100% Teck) Red Dog Mine (Teck / NANA) Lik (Teck / Solitario) Deposits Prospects 8
  • 123.
    Providing Orebodies forDevelopment Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District 40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production Advancing District Understanding Resources for the Future Red Dog Exploration Part 2 Agenda 9
  • 124.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Surfacing the District Potential 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Red Dog Creek staining noted USGS Open File “Red Dog” 3% ZnPb samples Su-Lik discovery Qanaiyaq discovery Red Dog Main discovery Landmark agreement between NANA & Cominco Production: Red Dog Main Production: Aqqaluk Production: Qanaiyaq Qanaiyaq Aktigiruq Anarraaq Paalaaq Su-Lik Aqqaluk Main Looking Northwest Aqqaluk discovery. Paalaaq discovery. Paalaaq N. discovery. Anarraaq discovery. Aktigiruq discovery. Anarraaq Extension. Anarraaq South. Aktigiruq Extension 1995 - Aqqaluk discovered DH: 180m @ 16% Zn, 3% Pb Pre-Mine Reserve: 52.7Mt @ 16.7% Zn, 4.3% Pb (NI 43-101, 9 March 2007, SEDAR) 1996-7 – Paalaaq, Paalaaq North discovered 1999 - Anarraaq discovered DH: 16m @ 30% Zn, 6% Pb 2001 - Aktigiruq discovered 2009 - 2011 Anarraaq Ext, Anarraaq South discovered 2015+ - Aktigiruq expansion Teck (Cominco) Stakes first claims ProductionActive Exploration 10
  • 125.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Red Dog Creek staining noted USGS Open File “Red Dog” 3% ZnPb samples Teck (Cominco) Stakes first claims Su-Lik discovery Qanaiyaq discovery Red Dog Main discovery Landmark agreement between NANA & Cominco Aqqaluk discovery. Paalaaq discovery. Paalaaq N. discovery. Anarraaq discovery. Aktigiruq discovery. Anarraaq Extension. Anarraaq South. Production: Red Dog Main Production: Aqqaluk Production: Qanaiyaq Aktigiruq Extension ProductionActive Exploration 11
  • 126.
    Providing Orebodies forDevelopment Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District 40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production Advancing District Understanding Resources for the Future Red Dog Exploration Part 2 Agenda 12
  • 127.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 High-Grade World-Class Deposits (Blevings et al., 2013) Sea Level Source of Fluids Source of Metals Red Dog Deposits Silt and Shale Black Shale Carbonate Laminated Barite Massive Barite Base Metals Sulphides Vein-hosted ore Silica rock ore ~50-100km ~1000-2000m 13
  • 128.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Multiple Deposits; Variable Characteristics Exploration Implications • Detachment, relocation and deformation complicates exploration • Decades of study permit exploration in challenging structure and stratigraphy • Fe-sulphide and barite associations detectable with geophysics • Lithogeochemical studies and pyrite chemistry provide vectors • Deposits are zoned Fault-bound and detached nature of Aqqaluk Challenging stratigraphy 14
  • 129.
    STRUCTURAL MAPPING GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS GEOCHEMICAL VECTORING ACADEMIC RESEARCH MODELING & INTERP FOCUSED DRILLING Red DogExploration Part 2 Building on our History of Discovery Integrated multi-disciplinary, multi-year approach 15
  • 130.
    Red Dog DistrictDrilling 2004-2017E Integrated exploration from prospect to mine Red Dog Exploration Part 2 Ongoing District Drilling 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E Mine Regional 16
  • 131.
    Providing Orebodies forDevelopment Red Dog, A Unique World-Class District 40 Years of Discovery & 25 Years of Production Advancing District Understanding Resources for the Future Red Dog Exploration Part 2 Agenda 17
  • 132.
    Paalaaq Su-Lik Aktigiruq Anarraaq Red Dog Main Aqqaluk Qanaiyaq RedDog Exploration Part 2 Numerous Regional Targets 1. Mine Area Cluster • Qanaiyaq • Main • Aqqaluk • Paalaaq 2. Anarraaq-Aktigiruq Cluster • Variable characteristics Two major deposit clusters Red Dog District (100% Teck) Red Dog Mine (Teck / NANA) Lik (Teck / Solitario) Deposits Prospects 18
  • 133.
    Qanaiyaq Aktigiruq Anarraaq Paalaaq Su-Lik Aqqaluk Main A A’ Qanaiyaq-Paalaaq Deposit Cluster Red DogExploration Part 2 Mine Area Deposit Cluster Qanaiyaq PaalaaqAqqalukMain A A’ Looking Northwest (South) (North) Creating value through long-term planning 1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017. 1 19
  • 134.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Recognizing the Full Potential Anarraaq Resource1 (pre-mine) Resource Category Tonnes (Mt) Zn (%) Pb (%) Ag (g/t) Inferred 19.4 14.4 4.2 73 Drill Collars Legend 1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine, February 21, 2017. Anarraaq • Discovered in 1999 • ~1km by 0.5km; depth 400m-1,000m • Sits beneath a major barite deposit Anarraaq 20
  • 135.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Anarraaq-Aktigiruq Cluster Significant Intercepts Non-Significant Intercepts Too Short Non Aktigiruq Drill Collars Legend Aktigiruq Anarraaq Select Significant Intercepts1 HOLE Intercept (m) Zn (%) Pb (%) Zone DDH1121 11.7 8.5 2.1 Upper DDH1730 9.6 8.6 4.5 Upper DDH1737 5.6 8.8 8.0 Upper DDH1745 3.0 9.9 0.7 Upper DDH1114 14.0 16.8 4.0 Central DDH1114 5.2 45.8 3.5 Central DDH1121 34.1 15.0 2.0 Central DDH1730 25.4 21.5 4.1 Central DDH1737 54.6 16.8 3.6 Central DDH1745 13.6 19.7 5.5 Central 1. Refer to disclosure dated September 18, 2017 available on SEDAR. Calculated using 8% Zn+Pb cut-off, Minimum 3.05m core length, 3.05m dilution. Aktigiruq Pre-2017 Drilling • 20,000m in 25 holes into deposit • ~3km by 1.5km; depth 400m-1,000m • Open in several directions 21
  • 136.
    Aktigiruq 2017 Program •Geological modeling • Geotechnical and Geomet support • Resource potential of Aktigiruq, internal continuity, limits of the system • On-going drilling • Additional significant intercepts • Remains open in several directions Red Dog Exploration Part 2 Aktigiruq Significant Intercepts Non-Significant Intercepts Too Short Non Aktigiruq Drill Collars Legend Aktigiruq Anarraaq 22
  • 137.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Anarraaq-Aktigiruq Cluster C C’ Anarraaq¹ Aktigiruq² Aktigiruq Exploration Target: • 80-150 Mt • 16-18% Zn+Pb Select Intercepts: • DDH 1730:25.4m @ 21.4% Zn, 4.1% Pb • DDH 1737:54.6m @ 16.8% Zn, 3.6% Pb 1. Refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Red Dog Mine dated February 21, 2017 and press release of September 18, 2017 both available on SEDAR . 2. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. Looking North projected to surface 23
  • 138.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Surfacing Value at Anarraaq-Aktigiruq 1km DDH1737 : 54.6m @ 16.8% Zn 3.6% Pb 0m Looking Northwest -1000m +1000m Low Grade/Pyritic Mineralization (upper) High Grade Mineralization (central) C C’ DDH1714: 42m @ 18.3% Zn 4.5% Pb, incl. 23m @ 23.2% Zn 5.2% Pb DDH1718: 54.7m @ 15.7% Zn, 4.0% Pb incl. 11.2m @ 34.2% Zn, 11.5% Pb Anarraaq Aktigiruq Red Dog Plate Wolverine Creek Plate ?? 24
  • 139.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Building a Quality Zinc Inventory Potential New GIANT system GIANT ZINC DEPOSITS +6 Mt Zn+Pb Aktigiruq ExplorationTarget1 80-150 Mt 16-18% Zn+Pb Sources: S&P Global Market Intelligence, SNL Metals & Mining Database, Teck Public Disclosures. 1. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 GradeZn+Pb% ContainedZn+Pb(Mt) 25
  • 140.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Global Context of Teck’s Zinc Resources 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 GradeZn+Pb% Resource Million Tonnes Red Dog Past Production Rampura Agucha Broken Hill McArthur River GIANT ZINC DEPOSITS (+6 Mt Zn+Pb) Qanaiyaq Aqqaluk Teena Anarraaq Paalaaq Su-Lik Aktigiruq Exploration Target1 80-150 Mt 16-18% Zn+Pb Hermosa Sources: S&P Global Market Intelligence, SNL Metals & Mining Database, Teck Public Disclosures. 1. Aktigiruq is an exploration target, not a resource. Refer to press release of September 18, 2017, available on SEDAR. Potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. Well Positioned; World Class 26
  • 141.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Delivering Value Through Exploration The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. For further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and Technical Report (43-101) dated Feb 21, 2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com • 40 years of discovery & 25 years of production • In collaboration with mine site, exploration is delivering… ‒ Timely, quality geoscience across all phases of operations ‒ Integrated multi-disciplinary approach to exploration and discovery ‒ New ore bodies for development when we need them • Multiple development options ‒ Multiple GIANT high-grade deposits; two major deposit clusters • Outstanding exploration potential 27
  • 142.
    Red Dog ExplorationPart 2 Thank You For Visiting Red Dog The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. For further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and Technical Report (43-101) dated Feb 21, 2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com The Red Dog scientific and technical information disclosed in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Rodrigo Marinho, P.Geo., Technical Director, Reserve Evaluation, Teck who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. For further information regarding Red Dog, please see Teck’s annual information form dated February 22, 2017, and Technical Report (43-101) dated February 21, 2017 which is available at www.teck.com and www.sedar.com
  • 143.
    Vancouver and RedDog Site Visit September 18-20, 2017