The presentation "SHIFT HAPPENS" was evaluated based on whether it achieved its learning objective and how effectively it was presented. The evaluation found that the objective was not clearly stated and the purpose seemed to be creating an insignificant feeling rather than examining globalization. Random statements were not supported and the information was unclear and disorganized. Although some slides effectively limited information and used images and animation, overall the presentation was too long, repetitive and not a useful training tool due to the lack of organization, clear objective and headings. The most noticeable mistakes were having too many slides and wasted space.

1. Presented by
Team Member #1
Team Member #2
Team Member #3
Sabrina McNair
“SHIFT HAPPENS”
EVALUATION

2.  We evaluated the presentation based on content and how it was
presented.
 Is Learning Objective Clear and Successfully Achieved?
 Is the Presentation Ineffective?
 Is the Presentation Effective?
 Is the Presentation a Useful Tool?
 Are there Noticeable Mistakes?
EVALUATION OVERVIEW

3.  Is the objective clear as to what this learning object is trying to
achieve?
 The Objective was not clearly stated in the presentation
 In the description of the presentation the objective was Examine globalization and
America’s future in the 21st Century
 The perceived purpose was to create a feeling of insignificance
which did not achieve the learning objective
LEARNING OBJECTIVE OUTCOME

4.  What parts of the presentation, if any, were ineffective?
 The random statements were not supported by any sources.
 The information was not clear.
 No list of objectives was provided.
 No outline was created.
PRESENTATION INEFFECTIVENESS

5.  What part or parts were effective?
 Each slide had a limited and focused amount of information
 Information was presented in a memorable manner
 The images reinforced the information
 Created a visually stimulating learning experience
 Used great animation, pictures, and color to keep readers attention
 Emphasized words to help reinforce
 Information was presented with analogy and comparisons
 Making it relevant and causing it to tap into the reader's background knowledge
PRESENTATION EFFECTIVENESS

6.  Was it a useful training tool?
 Presentation was not a useful tool.
 The content purpose seemed to share factual knowledge.
 It lacked a form of organization.
 It did not provide a clear learning objective for readers
 It did not provide headings
 It did not use a numbering system or list
 It was to lengthy
 (Stimson, 2002, pp. 25-27)
 Over all the transition of content was not very valuable
PRESENTATION USEFUL TOOL

7.  What were the most glaring presentation mistakes made?
 Too many slides (67 PowerPoint Slides)
 Wasted space
 Repetitive
NOTICEABLE MISTAKES

8.  Stimson, N. (2002). How to Write & Prepare Training Materials (2nd
Ed.) London, England: Kogan Page Ltd.
REFERENCES