SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
Target audience behavior
of premium pasta
Please note that all data in the report has been changed and serves for demonstration purposes only
General information
TA R G E T
P R O J E C T
Studying behavior of target audience
TA S K S
▪ Brands purchase rating
▪ Reasons for preferring different brands
▪ Differences between Italian and non-Italian brands
▪ Price preferences
G E O G R A P H Y
___________
O B J E C T S O F
R E S E A R C H
Visitors to food
hyperBrandets
M E T H O D O F
R E S E A R C H
Personal survey
S A M P L E S I Z E
765 respondents
T I M E L I N E S
2
December 2023
Rating of brands of pasta by purchase frequency
➢ Almost a third of respondents
(32.9%) constantly buy brand A
pasta
➢ Slightly less (29.5%) are constantly
buying B and C (17.5%)
➢ Brand D 13.3% of respondents
prefer
3
3,7%
0,8%
2,4%
3,9%
5,9%
13,3%
17,5%
29,5%
32,9%
N=765
Brand A
Brand B
Brand C
Brand D
Brand E
Brand F
Brand G
Brand H
Other
Rating of pasta brands by frequency of purchases
➢ Most active brand D purchased by survey participants city_______and city_______. Least active in city_______ and city_______.
➢ Brand A more residents prefer cities_______,_______,_______
➢ Brand B more often purchased by respondents from _______, _______ and_______
➢ Brand C more oftenother respondents were purchased by respondents from _______, _______ and_______.
➢ City_______ and_______differentfrom other cities with specifics: in_______demandmore evenly distributed across brands. IN
city_______strong positions of most brands, except Brand D
TOTAL City_______ City_____ City____ City____ City____ City____
Brand A 32.9% 53.1% 24.1% 41.5% 35.1% 28.0% 20.0%
Brand B 29.5% 25.0% 29.9% 37.3% 14.9% 26.7% 34.7%
Brand C 17.5% 20.8% 15.4% 5.7% 24.3% 10.7% 52.0%
Brand D 13.3% 10.4% 19.1% 8.8% 9.5% 29.3% 0.0%
Brand E 5.9% 3.1% 7.1% 3.6% 5.4% 2.7% 16.0%
Brand F 3.9% 4.2% 2.5% 1.0% 1.4% 0.0% 22.7%
Brand G 2.4% 1.0% 5.0% 0.5% 1.4% 0.0% 4.0%
Brand H 0.8% 1.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Other 3.7% 10.4% 0.0% 1.6% 9.5% 9.3% 1.3%
Base for
calculation
765 103 241 197 74 75 75
It is important to note that purchase frequency rates for premium pasta brands depend on the stores in the survey and their “premiums".
4
N=765
Reasons for choosing pasta brands
Most respondents prefer their chosen pasta over high quality and taste. In addition consumers appreciate in selected products convenience of
packaging, cooking speed and variety of shapes and types products.
Taste selected pasta respondents most often described as:
“pleasant”, “delicious even without sauces
and additives”, “impeccable”, “special
with spinach and tomatoes,
"a taste of traditional Italian cuisine"
Among other reasons respondents pointed out:
❖ Availability of discounts, promotions on TM
❖ Availability in stores
❖ Appearance of products (color, etc.)
❖ Health benefits
❖ Additional information on the packaging (preparation
time and recipes)
Causes Shares
High quality: 84.30%
Do not boil soft 16.40%
From durum flour 13.90%
Do not stick together 6.80%
The shape does not change after cooking 10.80%
dietary 1.60%
Taste 77.20%
Acceptable price 22.90%
Been buying them for a long time. 11.80%
Italian, prestigious brand 12.30%
I like the packaging, convenient 8.80%
Quickly preparing 8.10%
I know and trust only this brand 5.20%
A wide range of 2.90%
Optimal price-quality ratio 1.40%
Suitable for specific dishes 1.40%
Stand out on the shelf 1.20%
Other 4.50%
5
N=765
City_______ City____ City_____ City_____ City_____ City_____
High quality, including.: 77.00% 93.90% 58.00% 90.60% 65.30% 78.70%
Do not boil soft 19.6% 17.4% 5.0% 33.8% 8.0% 5.3%
From durum flour 16.8% 17.4% 8.0% 9.5% 12.0% 16.0%
Do not stick together 8.3% 9.5% 5.0% 8.1% 4.0% 2.7%
The shape does not change after cooking 6.1% 9.1% 8.5% 6.8% 8.0% 2.7%
Dietary 0.0% 3.7% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
Taste 65.6% 72.7% 82.5% 85.1% 72.0% 62.7%
Acceptable price 22.9% 0.0% 32.0% 18.9% 14.7% 29.3%
Been buying them for a long time. 6.3% 15.3% 11.0% 13.5% 12.0% 8.0%
Italian, prestigious brand 0.0% 20.7% 11.5% 5.4% 8.0% 14.7%
I like the packaging, convenient 5.2% 17.4% 4.5% 6.8% 2.7% 5.3%
Quickly preparing 7.3% 9.1% 10.5% 5.4% 5.3% 5.3%
I know and trust only this Brand 6.3% 7.4% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 14.7%
A wide range of 4.2% 6.2% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3%
Optimal price-quality ratio 3.1% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
Suitable for specific dishes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.7% 0.0%
Stand out on the shelf 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3%
Other 15.6% 5.4% 0.5% 1.4% 2.7% 2.7%
Base for calculation 103 241 197 74 75 75
6
Reasons for choosing brands of pasta in cities
N=765
Reasons for choosing premium pasta brands
The main reason Reason #2 Reason #3
Delicious 29.80% 32.70% 24.30%
High quality 26.90% 39.60% 42.10%
From durum wheat 4.90% 5.90% 7.30%
Do not boil soft 4.40% 11.40% 10.50%
Do not stick together 0.80% 4.60% 5.20%
Cook quickly 1.50% 2.20% 6.30%
I've been buying for a long time, I'm used to it 14.40% 7.00% 7.10%
Acceptable price 10.20% 8.50% 11.80%
Italian 6.10% 3.50% 4.70%
Beautiful packaging 4.60% 3.30% 3.70%
Required foe recipe 4.10% 3.00% 3.20%
For lasagna 1.10% 0.60% 0.50%
For pasta 0.60% 0.60% 0.30%
For canelloni 0.20% 0.00% 0.00%
famous brand 1.80% 0.70% 1.60%
Highlighted on display 0.60% 0.00% 0.00%
Premium class 0.50% 0.40% 0.00%
Promotion 0.30% 0.00% 0.00%
Appearance of products 0.30% 0.70% 0.80%
Available in every store 0.30% 0.00% 0.00%
Price-quality ratio 0.30% 0.60% 0.80%
Base for calculation: 658 542 382
7
N=765
Reasons for choosing Italian pasta in cities
➢ City_______ characterized by greater attention to quality and as a consequence, taste of pasta. These are the most discerning
consumers. Inhabitants of _______ oriented more than regional consumers prestige brands. In addition among the comments
residents_______ present more comparisons with pasta they tried in Italy. This can be explained by the fact that residents of
_______ more often than other consumers visit other countries and are therefore more selective and “sophisticated”.
➢ Consumer preferences from cities_______ partly follow the trends cities_______, but less stand out against the background of
regional cities. Residents of the city appreciate taste of pasta and speed of their preparation. Unlike for residents of _______,
residents_______ important acceptable cost of pasta.
➢ City_______ by most preferences showed itself as average city. The only difference from the average values ​​is the high brand
loyalty ("I know and trust only this brand"). This can be explained by the cultural characteristics of the city.
➢ Cities are cities with typical (average) consumer preferences. The only feature of the inhabitants of the city can be called an
orientation towards acceptable cost of pasta (as well as_______)
➢ City_______ more than other regional cities focuses on quality and taste of pasta, as well as in city_______. At the same time, in
contrast to_______, prestige brand residents_______ worries least (less than in other cities). This can be explained by the
peculiarities of the region: love for delicious food, proximity to Intalian culinary tastes.
➢ Resident preference feature cities_______ is"straightness" - the use of pasta for certain dishes (for example, for lasagna)
somewhat more often than in other cities.
➢ The rest of the indicators are at the average level.
8
N=765
Reasons for choosing different brands of pasta
9
Brand A Brand B brand C brand D
Base for calculation (according to 2-3 reasons per
respondent)
549 456 304 241
Number of those who chose TM (% of the sample) 32.9% 29.5% 17.5% 13.3%
Taste 31.9% 23.9% 25.3% 28.2%
Quality 13.5% 14.9% 16.4% 12.0%
Do not melt, do not stick 13.5% 12.1% 8.9% 10.4%
Price 6.0% 9.9% 6.3% 10.4%
From durum wheat 6.6% 5.3% 7.2% 8.3%
Packaging (convenient, beautiful, cardboard) 4.7% 1.8% 2.3% 7.1%
Italian 4.2% 6.1% 6.6% 5.4%
Russian production 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.1%
Seen on the shelf 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3%
For a specific meal 2.7% 2.4% 0.0% 2.5%
Nothing better than Italian 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7%
premium product 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7%
Appearance, form 2.2% 4.8% 3.3% 1.2%
Value for money 1.3% 0.9% 1.3% 1.2%
Get ready fast 3.1% 5.5% 2.6% 0.8%
A wide range of 2.0% 1.3% 2.3% 0.8%
Promotion 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.4%
Made according to standards 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%
We have been buying for a long time 4.0% 6.8% 10.5% 0.0%
famous brand 2.6% 2.9% 5.3% 0.0%
Dietary 0.7% 0.9% 1.6% 0.0%
Always available in stores 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%
There are recipes on the package 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
9
N=765
Reasons for choosing different brands of pasta
➢ The main reasons for choosing a brand D are: good taste, high quality (including properties during cooking - do not boil
soft and do not stick together) and reasonable price. Quotes: “Useful, from durum varieties”, “Excellent quality and taste”,
“Well boiled both inside and out”, “Beautiful color”.
➢ Brand A is mainly noted that they like the taste of products: “soft, boil well”, “the most delicious”, “excellent taste”, “cook
well - pleasant to the taste, not hard”.
➢ Buyers of brand B besides taste and quality, Italian origin, speed of preparation and variety of types and forms are
appreciated in its products. Quote: "The quality has not changed for many years", "Beautiful before and after cooking."
➢ Buyers of the brand C appreciate it as the most famous and longest existing on the market. Italian production and high
quality products are also important for them. Quote: “It has proven itself over many years”, “The brand has long been
known, I trust it”, “I have been eating it since almost childhood.”
10
N=765
The Importance of Buying Italian Pasta
Important
Doesn't
matter
Difficult to
answer
Base for
calculation
City _______ 59.8% 26.6% 13.7% 241
City _______ 51.4% 45.9% 2.7% 74
City _______ 49.3% 41.3% 9.3% 75
City _______ 29.1% 66.0% 4.9% 103
City _______ 24.0% 68.0% 8.0% 75
City _______ 21.8% 64.5% 13.7% 197
Total 40.5% 49.0% 10.5% 100%
Base for calculation 310 375 80 765
60%
51% 49%
29%
24%
22%
27%
46%
41%
66% 68%
64%
14%
3%
9%
5%
8%
14%
➢ For 49.0% of respondents, the country of
production of pasta is not important
➢ And for 40.5% it is important to buy exactly
italian pasta
➢ Most of these respondents live in city_______
and_______.
For buyers of pasta in the premium
segment, the fact of the Italian origin
of pasta is not a necessary condition
for the purchase of products. Rather,
the Italian origin of pasta can be seen
as a Brand D of high quality pasta.
11
N=765
Criteria for identifying brands as Italian
Respondents define pasta brand as Italian based on information on the package – in general 24.6%, brand awareness- 16.8%, packaging design
(made in traditional Italian colors, Italian landscapes) - 13.4%, brand names (in Italian) - 11.5% and other parameters
0,6%
0,9%
2,6%
2,8%
3,7%
5,3%
7,0%
10,7%
11,5%
13,4%
16,8%
24,6%
The base for calculations is 643 answers (on average, 2 answers were given by each respondent). According to the questionnaire, the question was asked only to
those respondents for whom it is important to buy Italian pasta, see question#2)
12
N=765
Informationon the package
famous brand
Package design
Name
Quality
Price
Taste
Do not stick, do not melt
From durum wheat
Appearance
Advertising
Recommendations
Criteria for identifying brands as Italian by city
TOTAL City_______ City____ City_____ City_____ City______ City_____
Information on the
packaging
24.6% 36.7% 21.4% 16.4% 44.7% 16.7% 20.9%
famous brand 16.8% 6.7% 26.2% 10.0% 2.6% 8.3% 14.0%
Package design 13.4% 2.2% 18.1% 10.0% 1.3% 6.7% 4.7%
Name 11.5% 4.4% 7.1% 17.3% 15.8% 21.7% 14.0%
Quality 10.7% 8.9% 9.7% 4.5% 18.4% 18.3% 11.6%
Price 7.0% 2.2% 7.4% 10.9% 2.6% 6.7% 7.0%
Taste 5.3% 7.8% 2.6% 8.2% 7.9% 1.7% 4.7%
Do not stick, do not melt 3.7% 2.2% 2.6% 3.6% 6.6% 6.7% 7.0%
From durum wheat 2.8% 2.2% 2.3% 1.8% 0.0% 8.3% 7.0%
Appearance 2.6% 6.7% 2.3% 0.9% 0.0% 5.0% 7.0%
Advertising 0.9% 0.0% 0.3% 3.6% 0.0% 0.0% 2.3%
Recommendations 0.6% 2.2% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Base for calculations 643 45 309 110 76 60 43
13
N=765
Upper price limit for Italian pasta
➢ On average, for the sample, the maximum cost that respondents are willing to pay for their brand of pasta was 10 Euro.
➢ The highest price is named in city_______ - 13 Euro
the lowest in city_______- 8 Euro
➢ Most respondents are willing to pay for the brand of pasta they buy from 7 before 10 euros.
City Price Before 5 euro From 5 before 7 euro
From 7 before 10
euro
Higher 10 Euro
City_______ €13.00 0.0% 17.6% 37.8% 44.6%
City_______ €12.00 2.9% 13.6% 44.7% 38.8%
City_______ €11.00 2.7% 30.7% 37.3% 29.3%
City_______ €9.00 0.0% 23.7% 54.8% 21.6%
City_______ €9.00 6.7% 18.7% 57.3% 17.3%
City_______ €8.00 12.2% 39.1% 32.0% 16.8%
14
N=765
Upper price limit for pasta premium segment
➢ Highest price brand consumers are willing to pay for selected premium pasta A - 12.95 euros. Consumers are willing to
pay the lowest price for D (those who consider it Italian) - 8.38 euros.
➢ The largest difference between the actual average price and the maximum at the price of Brand G (3,4 euro) and F (3,1
euro).
➢ Despite the high loyalty to premium products, many respondents said they were not ready to pay more for "their own
brand". Some of them noted that they might start buying cheaper brands if prices for their “own” brand rise (0.7%).
➢ Acceptable for respondents is the price at the level 7 euro per package.
12,95 €
10,00 €
11,00 €
9,50 €
10,67 €
8,00 €
10,00 €
8,50 €
9,60 €
6,50 €
9,40€
6,00 €
8,38 €
6,00 €
brand
Difference between
maximum and
actual price
Brand G 56.67%
Brand F 47.69%
Brand D 39,67%
Brand E 33,38%
Brand A 29.50%
Brand F 17.65%
Brand B 15.79%
15
N=765
Definition criteria Brand D as Italian brand
TOTAL City_______ City_______ City_______ City_______ City ______ City _____
Name 50.4% 55.9% 46.1% 45.4% 53.2% 48.6% 58.4%
Package design 18.0% 12.5% 27.8% 19.1% 13.8% 13.5% 4.0%
High price 9.0% 2.4% 8.1% 13.5% 6.4% 2.7% 10.4%
Information on the packaging 6.5% 4.2% 4.9% 9.2% 3.2% 13.5% 8.8%
The word "paste" 4.7% 5.5% 7.7% 2.0% 1.1% 0.0% 4.8%
Appearance of products 3.4% 6.1% 3.8% 2.4% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0%
High quality 2.6% 1.2% 1.1% 5.2% 3.2% 5.4% 0.8%
Window display next to Italian 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.5% 2.8%
Taste 1.3% 2.4% 0.0% 2.8% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0%
There is a certain type of
product
0.8% 0.0% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Flour grade, composition 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 2.1% 2.7% 0.0%
Italian technology 0.2% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Get ready fast 0.1% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Base for calculations 873 82 284 251 94 37 125
16
N=765
Summary
✓ Among those surveyed, 52.5% paid attention to brand D in the shop
✓ At the same time bought a brand D 13.3% of respondents
✓ Most respondents did not choose a brand D because they are not familiar with it (20.56%) or did not notice it on the shelf (12.44%).
✓ Most active brand D purchased by survey participants city_______ and city_______. Least active in the city_______and
city_______.
✓ Majority of respondents prefer to buy Italian pasta due to its taste and high quality. In addition consumers appreciate the
convenience of packaging, the speed of cooking pasta and the variety of product shapes
✓ For 40.5% of respondents, it is important to buy Italian pasta
✓ Among all respondents 67.6% believe brand D is an Italian brand
✓ Respondents define a pasta brand as Italian based on the information on the packaging (24.6%), brand awareness (16.8%),
packaging design (13.4%) and brand name (11.5%)
✓ More than 50% of respondents consider the brand D Italian thanks to its name (in Italian) as well as the design of the packaging, the
high price (similar to well-known Italian brands) and the information on the packaging (inscriptions in Italian).
✓ The maximum cost that respondents are willing to pay for "their" brand of pasta is 10 Euro
✓ Consumers are willing to pay the lowest price D (those who consider it Italian) - 8.3 euro.
✓ Among respondents who believe that the brand D is Italian the maximum price for these products was called based on their own
capabilities and the usual purchase price (8.3 euro). Thus, the excess over the actual cost is 39.67% (third place after G (56.67%) and
F (47.69%)
✓ The reasons why brand D loses competitors (in descending order):
✓ Low awareness of the brand (a fifth of the respondents did not choose the brand for this very reason)
✓ Not Italian "signs” on the packaging and price tags: the country of production is indicated, the logo is placed,other
signsstandards (respondents read the back of the packaging)
✓ The habit of "their" brands and inconspicuousness the front side of the package on the shelf (12.44% did not notice the
brand)
✓ Packaging design (no Italian flag, not cardboard, does not seem expensive)
✓ Pasta D thicker than Italian
17
Target audience behaviour marketing research

More Related Content

Similar to Target audience behaviour marketing research

50 mejores marcas Brand z 2014 latam top50 chart
50 mejores marcas Brand z 2014 latam top50 chart50 mejores marcas Brand z 2014 latam top50 chart
50 mejores marcas Brand z 2014 latam top50 chart
Fran Checotah
 
Summer training project
Summer training projectSummer training project
Summer training project
Ena Verma
 
Oakbrook Center Presentation-Final(1)EM
Oakbrook Center Presentation-Final(1)EMOakbrook Center Presentation-Final(1)EM
Oakbrook Center Presentation-Final(1)EM
GRACE(ZHENG) ZHONG
 
A. Financial ProjectionsSales ForecastMarketing budget.docx
A. Financial ProjectionsSales ForecastMarketing budget.docxA. Financial ProjectionsSales ForecastMarketing budget.docx
A. Financial ProjectionsSales ForecastMarketing budget.docx
bartholomeocoombs
 

Similar to Target audience behaviour marketing research (20)

Digital Analyst Forecasting
Digital Analyst ForecastingDigital Analyst Forecasting
Digital Analyst Forecasting
 
Measurements of flows marketing research
Measurements of flows marketing researchMeasurements of flows marketing research
Measurements of flows marketing research
 
Presentación Camilo Herrera | eCommerce Day Bogotá 2018
Presentación Camilo Herrera | eCommerce Day Bogotá 2018Presentación Camilo Herrera | eCommerce Day Bogotá 2018
Presentación Camilo Herrera | eCommerce Day Bogotá 2018
 
Oakbrook Center Presentation-Final
Oakbrook Center Presentation-FinalOakbrook Center Presentation-Final
Oakbrook Center Presentation-Final
 
50 mejores marcas Brand z 2014 latam top50 chart
50 mejores marcas Brand z 2014 latam top50 chart50 mejores marcas Brand z 2014 latam top50 chart
50 mejores marcas Brand z 2014 latam top50 chart
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q1 2017 | Segment:...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q1 2017 | Segment:...Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q1 2017 | Segment:...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q1 2017 | Segment:...
 
Starbucks
StarbucksStarbucks
Starbucks
 
Summer training project
Summer training projectSummer training project
Summer training project
 
Модель органической фермы. Роман Макухин
Модель органической фермы. Роман МакухинМодель органической фермы. Роман Макухин
Модель органической фермы. Роман Макухин
 
Proven Menu Engineering Techniques - 2017 Mid America Restaurant Expo
Proven Menu Engineering Techniques - 2017 Mid America Restaurant ExpoProven Menu Engineering Techniques - 2017 Mid America Restaurant Expo
Proven Menu Engineering Techniques - 2017 Mid America Restaurant Expo
 
Oakbrook Center Presentation-Final(1)EM
Oakbrook Center Presentation-Final(1)EMOakbrook Center Presentation-Final(1)EM
Oakbrook Center Presentation-Final(1)EM
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q4 2015 | Segment:...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q4 2015 | Segment:...Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q4 2015 | Segment:...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q4 2015 | Segment:...
 
Champagne market in Korea, short consumer Survey
Champagne market in Korea, short consumer SurveyChampagne market in Korea, short consumer Survey
Champagne market in Korea, short consumer Survey
 
Annual report (tai lieu them khao ve KPI)
Annual report (tai lieu them khao ve KPI)Annual report (tai lieu them khao ve KPI)
Annual report (tai lieu them khao ve KPI)
 
Retail analytics ASIA workshop_ New perspective on GfK retail analytics
Retail analytics ASIA workshop_ New perspective on GfK retail analyticsRetail analytics ASIA workshop_ New perspective on GfK retail analytics
Retail analytics ASIA workshop_ New perspective on GfK retail analytics
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q2 2015 | Segment:...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q2 2015 | Segment:...Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q2 2015 | Segment:...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q2 2015 | Segment:...
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q2 2016 | Segment:...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q2 2016 | Segment:...Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q2 2016 | Segment:...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Convenience Store Industry | Q2 2016 | Segment:...
 
Natureview farm
Natureview  farm  Natureview  farm
Natureview farm
 
International Finance
International FinanceInternational Finance
International Finance
 
A. Financial ProjectionsSales ForecastMarketing budget.docx
A. Financial ProjectionsSales ForecastMarketing budget.docxA. Financial ProjectionsSales ForecastMarketing budget.docx
A. Financial ProjectionsSales ForecastMarketing budget.docx
 

More from mail888275

Servqual index to measure clients satisfaction
Servqual index to measure clients satisfactionServqual index to measure clients satisfaction
Servqual index to measure clients satisfaction
mail888275
 
NPS in retail (Net Promoter Score index)
NPS in retail (Net Promoter Score index)NPS in retail (Net Promoter Score index)
NPS in retail (Net Promoter Score index)
mail888275
 
Market penetration, market capacity, competitive analysis
Market penetration, market capacity, competitive analysisMarket penetration, market capacity, competitive analysis
Market penetration, market capacity, competitive analysis
mail888275
 
Brand awareness B2C, brand value, trademark awareness
Brand awareness B2C, brand value, trademark awarenessBrand awareness B2C, brand value, trademark awareness
Brand awareness B2C, brand value, trademark awareness
mail888275
 

More from mail888275 (19)

Satisfaction of employees, informal leaders, team, relationships
Satisfaction of employees, informal leaders, team, relationshipsSatisfaction of employees, informal leaders, team, relationships
Satisfaction of employees, informal leaders, team, relationships
 
Testing new products in marketing research
Testing new products in marketing researchTesting new products in marketing research
Testing new products in marketing research
 
Servqual index to measure clients satisfaction
Servqual index to measure clients satisfactionServqual index to measure clients satisfaction
Servqual index to measure clients satisfaction
 
Product perception marketing research, study
Product perception marketing research, studyProduct perception marketing research, study
Product perception marketing research, study
 
Portrait and segmentation of target audience.pdf
Portrait and segmentation of target audience.pdfPortrait and segmentation of target audience.pdf
Portrait and segmentation of target audience.pdf
 
Online survey about fitness, B2C survey, marketing research
Online survey about fitness, B2C survey, marketing researchOnline survey about fitness, B2C survey, marketing research
Online survey about fitness, B2C survey, marketing research
 
NPS in retail (Net Promoter Score index)
NPS in retail (Net Promoter Score index)NPS in retail (Net Promoter Score index)
NPS in retail (Net Promoter Score index)
 
Media preferences of target audience.pdf
Media preferences of target audience.pdfMedia preferences of target audience.pdf
Media preferences of target audience.pdf
 
Market penetration, market capacity, competitive analysis
Market penetration, market capacity, competitive analysisMarket penetration, market capacity, competitive analysis
Market penetration, market capacity, competitive analysis
 
Market capacity of metal roofing materials
Market capacity of metal roofing materialsMarket capacity of metal roofing materials
Market capacity of metal roofing materials
 
Market attractiveness matrix, marketing research
Market attractiveness matrix, marketing researchMarket attractiveness matrix, marketing research
Market attractiveness matrix, marketing research
 
Level of satisfaction and loyalty in B2B
Level of satisfaction and loyalty in B2BLevel of satisfaction and loyalty in B2B
Level of satisfaction and loyalty in B2B
 
Effectiveness of advertising and marketing
Effectiveness of advertising and marketingEffectiveness of advertising and marketing
Effectiveness of advertising and marketing
 
CSat, CSI Customer satisfaction by segments
CSat, CSI Customer satisfaction by segmentsCSat, CSI Customer satisfaction by segments
CSat, CSI Customer satisfaction by segments
 
Competitive rating, Competitive analysis
Competitive rating, Competitive analysisCompetitive rating, Competitive analysis
Competitive rating, Competitive analysis
 
Brand awareness B2C, brand value, trademark awareness
Brand awareness B2C, brand value, trademark awarenessBrand awareness B2C, brand value, trademark awareness
Brand awareness B2C, brand value, trademark awareness
 
B2B survey brand awareness of IT-brand in specific area
B2B survey brand awareness of IT-brand in specific areaB2B survey brand awareness of IT-brand in specific area
B2B survey brand awareness of IT-brand in specific area
 
B2B customer satisfaction factors: CSat or CSI index
B2B customer satisfaction factors: CSat or CSI indexB2B customer satisfaction factors: CSat or CSI index
B2B customer satisfaction factors: CSat or CSI index
 
Price sensitivity marketing research report
Price sensitivity marketing research reportPrice sensitivity marketing research report
Price sensitivity marketing research report
 

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 144 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 144 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 144 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 144 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
25+ years’ experience (310) 882-6330 Love Spells in Wilmington, DE | black ma...
25+ years’ experience (310) 882-6330 Love Spells in Wilmington, DE | black ma...25+ years’ experience (310) 882-6330 Love Spells in Wilmington, DE | black ma...
25+ years’ experience (310) 882-6330 Love Spells in Wilmington, DE | black ma...
 
Major SEO Trends in 2024 - Banyanbrain Digital
Major SEO Trends in 2024 - Banyanbrain DigitalMajor SEO Trends in 2024 - Banyanbrain Digital
Major SEO Trends in 2024 - Banyanbrain Digital
 
Google 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best Strategies
Google 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best StrategiesGoogle 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best Strategies
Google 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best Strategies
 
Elevating Your Digital Presence by Evitha.pdf
Elevating Your Digital Presence by Evitha.pdfElevating Your Digital Presence by Evitha.pdf
Elevating Your Digital Presence by Evitha.pdf
 
VIP Call Girls Dongri WhatsApp +91-9833363713, Full Night Service
VIP Call Girls Dongri WhatsApp +91-9833363713, Full Night ServiceVIP Call Girls Dongri WhatsApp +91-9833363713, Full Night Service
VIP Call Girls Dongri WhatsApp +91-9833363713, Full Night Service
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 39 Noida Escorts Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 39 Noida Escorts Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 39 Noida Escorts Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 39 Noida Escorts Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Distribution Ad Platform_ The Role of Distribution Ad Network.pdf
Distribution Ad Platform_ The Role of  Distribution Ad Network.pdfDistribution Ad Platform_ The Role of  Distribution Ad Network.pdf
Distribution Ad Platform_ The Role of Distribution Ad Network.pdf
 
Elevate Your Advertising Game: Introducing Billion Broadcaster Lift Advertising
Elevate Your Advertising Game: Introducing Billion Broadcaster Lift AdvertisingElevate Your Advertising Game: Introducing Billion Broadcaster Lift Advertising
Elevate Your Advertising Game: Introducing Billion Broadcaster Lift Advertising
 
The Science of Landing Page Messaging.pdf
The Science of Landing Page Messaging.pdfThe Science of Landing Page Messaging.pdf
The Science of Landing Page Messaging.pdf
 
Unveiling the Legacy of the Rosetta stone A Key to Ancient Knowledge.pptx
Unveiling the Legacy of the Rosetta stone A Key to Ancient Knowledge.pptxUnveiling the Legacy of the Rosetta stone A Key to Ancient Knowledge.pptx
Unveiling the Legacy of the Rosetta stone A Key to Ancient Knowledge.pptx
 
Situation Analysis | Management Company.
Situation Analysis | Management Company.Situation Analysis | Management Company.
Situation Analysis | Management Company.
 
Busty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 49 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Busty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 49 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBusty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 49 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Busty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 49 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Instant Digital Issuance: An Overview With Critical First Touch Best Practices
Instant Digital Issuance: An Overview With Critical First Touch Best PracticesInstant Digital Issuance: An Overview With Critical First Touch Best Practices
Instant Digital Issuance: An Overview With Critical First Touch Best Practices
 
Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15
Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15
Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 128 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 128 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 128 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 128 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Vaishali Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Vaishali Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Vaishali Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Vaishali Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Unlocking the Mystery of the Voynich Manuscript
Unlocking the Mystery of the Voynich ManuscriptUnlocking the Mystery of the Voynich Manuscript
Unlocking the Mystery of the Voynich Manuscript
 
[Expert Panel] New Google Shopping Ads Strategies Uncovered
[Expert Panel] New Google Shopping Ads Strategies Uncovered[Expert Panel] New Google Shopping Ads Strategies Uncovered
[Expert Panel] New Google Shopping Ads Strategies Uncovered
 
Enhancing Business Visibility PR Firms in San Francisco
Enhancing Business Visibility PR Firms in San FranciscoEnhancing Business Visibility PR Firms in San Francisco
Enhancing Business Visibility PR Firms in San Francisco
 

Target audience behaviour marketing research

  • 1. Target audience behavior of premium pasta Please note that all data in the report has been changed and serves for demonstration purposes only
  • 2. General information TA R G E T P R O J E C T Studying behavior of target audience TA S K S ▪ Brands purchase rating ▪ Reasons for preferring different brands ▪ Differences between Italian and non-Italian brands ▪ Price preferences G E O G R A P H Y ___________ O B J E C T S O F R E S E A R C H Visitors to food hyperBrandets M E T H O D O F R E S E A R C H Personal survey S A M P L E S I Z E 765 respondents T I M E L I N E S 2 December 2023
  • 3. Rating of brands of pasta by purchase frequency ➢ Almost a third of respondents (32.9%) constantly buy brand A pasta ➢ Slightly less (29.5%) are constantly buying B and C (17.5%) ➢ Brand D 13.3% of respondents prefer 3 3,7% 0,8% 2,4% 3,9% 5,9% 13,3% 17,5% 29,5% 32,9% N=765 Brand A Brand B Brand C Brand D Brand E Brand F Brand G Brand H Other
  • 4. Rating of pasta brands by frequency of purchases ➢ Most active brand D purchased by survey participants city_______and city_______. Least active in city_______ and city_______. ➢ Brand A more residents prefer cities_______,_______,_______ ➢ Brand B more often purchased by respondents from _______, _______ and_______ ➢ Brand C more oftenother respondents were purchased by respondents from _______, _______ and_______. ➢ City_______ and_______differentfrom other cities with specifics: in_______demandmore evenly distributed across brands. IN city_______strong positions of most brands, except Brand D TOTAL City_______ City_____ City____ City____ City____ City____ Brand A 32.9% 53.1% 24.1% 41.5% 35.1% 28.0% 20.0% Brand B 29.5% 25.0% 29.9% 37.3% 14.9% 26.7% 34.7% Brand C 17.5% 20.8% 15.4% 5.7% 24.3% 10.7% 52.0% Brand D 13.3% 10.4% 19.1% 8.8% 9.5% 29.3% 0.0% Brand E 5.9% 3.1% 7.1% 3.6% 5.4% 2.7% 16.0% Brand F 3.9% 4.2% 2.5% 1.0% 1.4% 0.0% 22.7% Brand G 2.4% 1.0% 5.0% 0.5% 1.4% 0.0% 4.0% Brand H 0.8% 1.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Other 3.7% 10.4% 0.0% 1.6% 9.5% 9.3% 1.3% Base for calculation 765 103 241 197 74 75 75 It is important to note that purchase frequency rates for premium pasta brands depend on the stores in the survey and their “premiums". 4 N=765
  • 5. Reasons for choosing pasta brands Most respondents prefer their chosen pasta over high quality and taste. In addition consumers appreciate in selected products convenience of packaging, cooking speed and variety of shapes and types products. Taste selected pasta respondents most often described as: “pleasant”, “delicious even without sauces and additives”, “impeccable”, “special with spinach and tomatoes, "a taste of traditional Italian cuisine" Among other reasons respondents pointed out: ❖ Availability of discounts, promotions on TM ❖ Availability in stores ❖ Appearance of products (color, etc.) ❖ Health benefits ❖ Additional information on the packaging (preparation time and recipes) Causes Shares High quality: 84.30% Do not boil soft 16.40% From durum flour 13.90% Do not stick together 6.80% The shape does not change after cooking 10.80% dietary 1.60% Taste 77.20% Acceptable price 22.90% Been buying them for a long time. 11.80% Italian, prestigious brand 12.30% I like the packaging, convenient 8.80% Quickly preparing 8.10% I know and trust only this brand 5.20% A wide range of 2.90% Optimal price-quality ratio 1.40% Suitable for specific dishes 1.40% Stand out on the shelf 1.20% Other 4.50% 5 N=765
  • 6. City_______ City____ City_____ City_____ City_____ City_____ High quality, including.: 77.00% 93.90% 58.00% 90.60% 65.30% 78.70% Do not boil soft 19.6% 17.4% 5.0% 33.8% 8.0% 5.3% From durum flour 16.8% 17.4% 8.0% 9.5% 12.0% 16.0% Do not stick together 8.3% 9.5% 5.0% 8.1% 4.0% 2.7% The shape does not change after cooking 6.1% 9.1% 8.5% 6.8% 8.0% 2.7% Dietary 0.0% 3.7% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% Taste 65.6% 72.7% 82.5% 85.1% 72.0% 62.7% Acceptable price 22.9% 0.0% 32.0% 18.9% 14.7% 29.3% Been buying them for a long time. 6.3% 15.3% 11.0% 13.5% 12.0% 8.0% Italian, prestigious brand 0.0% 20.7% 11.5% 5.4% 8.0% 14.7% I like the packaging, convenient 5.2% 17.4% 4.5% 6.8% 2.7% 5.3% Quickly preparing 7.3% 9.1% 10.5% 5.4% 5.3% 5.3% I know and trust only this Brand 6.3% 7.4% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 14.7% A wide range of 4.2% 6.2% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% Optimal price-quality ratio 3.1% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% Suitable for specific dishes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.7% 0.0% Stand out on the shelf 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% Other 15.6% 5.4% 0.5% 1.4% 2.7% 2.7% Base for calculation 103 241 197 74 75 75 6 Reasons for choosing brands of pasta in cities N=765
  • 7. Reasons for choosing premium pasta brands The main reason Reason #2 Reason #3 Delicious 29.80% 32.70% 24.30% High quality 26.90% 39.60% 42.10% From durum wheat 4.90% 5.90% 7.30% Do not boil soft 4.40% 11.40% 10.50% Do not stick together 0.80% 4.60% 5.20% Cook quickly 1.50% 2.20% 6.30% I've been buying for a long time, I'm used to it 14.40% 7.00% 7.10% Acceptable price 10.20% 8.50% 11.80% Italian 6.10% 3.50% 4.70% Beautiful packaging 4.60% 3.30% 3.70% Required foe recipe 4.10% 3.00% 3.20% For lasagna 1.10% 0.60% 0.50% For pasta 0.60% 0.60% 0.30% For canelloni 0.20% 0.00% 0.00% famous brand 1.80% 0.70% 1.60% Highlighted on display 0.60% 0.00% 0.00% Premium class 0.50% 0.40% 0.00% Promotion 0.30% 0.00% 0.00% Appearance of products 0.30% 0.70% 0.80% Available in every store 0.30% 0.00% 0.00% Price-quality ratio 0.30% 0.60% 0.80% Base for calculation: 658 542 382 7 N=765
  • 8. Reasons for choosing Italian pasta in cities ➢ City_______ characterized by greater attention to quality and as a consequence, taste of pasta. These are the most discerning consumers. Inhabitants of _______ oriented more than regional consumers prestige brands. In addition among the comments residents_______ present more comparisons with pasta they tried in Italy. This can be explained by the fact that residents of _______ more often than other consumers visit other countries and are therefore more selective and “sophisticated”. ➢ Consumer preferences from cities_______ partly follow the trends cities_______, but less stand out against the background of regional cities. Residents of the city appreciate taste of pasta and speed of their preparation. Unlike for residents of _______, residents_______ important acceptable cost of pasta. ➢ City_______ by most preferences showed itself as average city. The only difference from the average values ​​is the high brand loyalty ("I know and trust only this brand"). This can be explained by the cultural characteristics of the city. ➢ Cities are cities with typical (average) consumer preferences. The only feature of the inhabitants of the city can be called an orientation towards acceptable cost of pasta (as well as_______) ➢ City_______ more than other regional cities focuses on quality and taste of pasta, as well as in city_______. At the same time, in contrast to_______, prestige brand residents_______ worries least (less than in other cities). This can be explained by the peculiarities of the region: love for delicious food, proximity to Intalian culinary tastes. ➢ Resident preference feature cities_______ is"straightness" - the use of pasta for certain dishes (for example, for lasagna) somewhat more often than in other cities. ➢ The rest of the indicators are at the average level. 8 N=765
  • 9. Reasons for choosing different brands of pasta 9 Brand A Brand B brand C brand D Base for calculation (according to 2-3 reasons per respondent) 549 456 304 241 Number of those who chose TM (% of the sample) 32.9% 29.5% 17.5% 13.3% Taste 31.9% 23.9% 25.3% 28.2% Quality 13.5% 14.9% 16.4% 12.0% Do not melt, do not stick 13.5% 12.1% 8.9% 10.4% Price 6.0% 9.9% 6.3% 10.4% From durum wheat 6.6% 5.3% 7.2% 8.3% Packaging (convenient, beautiful, cardboard) 4.7% 1.8% 2.3% 7.1% Italian 4.2% 6.1% 6.6% 5.4% Russian production 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% Seen on the shelf 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% For a specific meal 2.7% 2.4% 0.0% 2.5% Nothing better than Italian 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% premium product 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% Appearance, form 2.2% 4.8% 3.3% 1.2% Value for money 1.3% 0.9% 1.3% 1.2% Get ready fast 3.1% 5.5% 2.6% 0.8% A wide range of 2.0% 1.3% 2.3% 0.8% Promotion 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.4% Made according to standards 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% We have been buying for a long time 4.0% 6.8% 10.5% 0.0% famous brand 2.6% 2.9% 5.3% 0.0% Dietary 0.7% 0.9% 1.6% 0.0% Always available in stores 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% There are recipes on the package 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9 N=765
  • 10. Reasons for choosing different brands of pasta ➢ The main reasons for choosing a brand D are: good taste, high quality (including properties during cooking - do not boil soft and do not stick together) and reasonable price. Quotes: “Useful, from durum varieties”, “Excellent quality and taste”, “Well boiled both inside and out”, “Beautiful color”. ➢ Brand A is mainly noted that they like the taste of products: “soft, boil well”, “the most delicious”, “excellent taste”, “cook well - pleasant to the taste, not hard”. ➢ Buyers of brand B besides taste and quality, Italian origin, speed of preparation and variety of types and forms are appreciated in its products. Quote: "The quality has not changed for many years", "Beautiful before and after cooking." ➢ Buyers of the brand C appreciate it as the most famous and longest existing on the market. Italian production and high quality products are also important for them. Quote: “It has proven itself over many years”, “The brand has long been known, I trust it”, “I have been eating it since almost childhood.” 10 N=765
  • 11. The Importance of Buying Italian Pasta Important Doesn't matter Difficult to answer Base for calculation City _______ 59.8% 26.6% 13.7% 241 City _______ 51.4% 45.9% 2.7% 74 City _______ 49.3% 41.3% 9.3% 75 City _______ 29.1% 66.0% 4.9% 103 City _______ 24.0% 68.0% 8.0% 75 City _______ 21.8% 64.5% 13.7% 197 Total 40.5% 49.0% 10.5% 100% Base for calculation 310 375 80 765 60% 51% 49% 29% 24% 22% 27% 46% 41% 66% 68% 64% 14% 3% 9% 5% 8% 14% ➢ For 49.0% of respondents, the country of production of pasta is not important ➢ And for 40.5% it is important to buy exactly italian pasta ➢ Most of these respondents live in city_______ and_______. For buyers of pasta in the premium segment, the fact of the Italian origin of pasta is not a necessary condition for the purchase of products. Rather, the Italian origin of pasta can be seen as a Brand D of high quality pasta. 11 N=765
  • 12. Criteria for identifying brands as Italian Respondents define pasta brand as Italian based on information on the package – in general 24.6%, brand awareness- 16.8%, packaging design (made in traditional Italian colors, Italian landscapes) - 13.4%, brand names (in Italian) - 11.5% and other parameters 0,6% 0,9% 2,6% 2,8% 3,7% 5,3% 7,0% 10,7% 11,5% 13,4% 16,8% 24,6% The base for calculations is 643 answers (on average, 2 answers were given by each respondent). According to the questionnaire, the question was asked only to those respondents for whom it is important to buy Italian pasta, see question#2) 12 N=765 Informationon the package famous brand Package design Name Quality Price Taste Do not stick, do not melt From durum wheat Appearance Advertising Recommendations
  • 13. Criteria for identifying brands as Italian by city TOTAL City_______ City____ City_____ City_____ City______ City_____ Information on the packaging 24.6% 36.7% 21.4% 16.4% 44.7% 16.7% 20.9% famous brand 16.8% 6.7% 26.2% 10.0% 2.6% 8.3% 14.0% Package design 13.4% 2.2% 18.1% 10.0% 1.3% 6.7% 4.7% Name 11.5% 4.4% 7.1% 17.3% 15.8% 21.7% 14.0% Quality 10.7% 8.9% 9.7% 4.5% 18.4% 18.3% 11.6% Price 7.0% 2.2% 7.4% 10.9% 2.6% 6.7% 7.0% Taste 5.3% 7.8% 2.6% 8.2% 7.9% 1.7% 4.7% Do not stick, do not melt 3.7% 2.2% 2.6% 3.6% 6.6% 6.7% 7.0% From durum wheat 2.8% 2.2% 2.3% 1.8% 0.0% 8.3% 7.0% Appearance 2.6% 6.7% 2.3% 0.9% 0.0% 5.0% 7.0% Advertising 0.9% 0.0% 0.3% 3.6% 0.0% 0.0% 2.3% Recommendations 0.6% 2.2% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Base for calculations 643 45 309 110 76 60 43 13 N=765
  • 14. Upper price limit for Italian pasta ➢ On average, for the sample, the maximum cost that respondents are willing to pay for their brand of pasta was 10 Euro. ➢ The highest price is named in city_______ - 13 Euro the lowest in city_______- 8 Euro ➢ Most respondents are willing to pay for the brand of pasta they buy from 7 before 10 euros. City Price Before 5 euro From 5 before 7 euro From 7 before 10 euro Higher 10 Euro City_______ €13.00 0.0% 17.6% 37.8% 44.6% City_______ €12.00 2.9% 13.6% 44.7% 38.8% City_______ €11.00 2.7% 30.7% 37.3% 29.3% City_______ €9.00 0.0% 23.7% 54.8% 21.6% City_______ €9.00 6.7% 18.7% 57.3% 17.3% City_______ €8.00 12.2% 39.1% 32.0% 16.8% 14 N=765
  • 15. Upper price limit for pasta premium segment ➢ Highest price brand consumers are willing to pay for selected premium pasta A - 12.95 euros. Consumers are willing to pay the lowest price for D (those who consider it Italian) - 8.38 euros. ➢ The largest difference between the actual average price and the maximum at the price of Brand G (3,4 euro) and F (3,1 euro). ➢ Despite the high loyalty to premium products, many respondents said they were not ready to pay more for "their own brand". Some of them noted that they might start buying cheaper brands if prices for their “own” brand rise (0.7%). ➢ Acceptable for respondents is the price at the level 7 euro per package. 12,95 € 10,00 € 11,00 € 9,50 € 10,67 € 8,00 € 10,00 € 8,50 € 9,60 € 6,50 € 9,40€ 6,00 € 8,38 € 6,00 € brand Difference between maximum and actual price Brand G 56.67% Brand F 47.69% Brand D 39,67% Brand E 33,38% Brand A 29.50% Brand F 17.65% Brand B 15.79% 15 N=765
  • 16. Definition criteria Brand D as Italian brand TOTAL City_______ City_______ City_______ City_______ City ______ City _____ Name 50.4% 55.9% 46.1% 45.4% 53.2% 48.6% 58.4% Package design 18.0% 12.5% 27.8% 19.1% 13.8% 13.5% 4.0% High price 9.0% 2.4% 8.1% 13.5% 6.4% 2.7% 10.4% Information on the packaging 6.5% 4.2% 4.9% 9.2% 3.2% 13.5% 8.8% The word "paste" 4.7% 5.5% 7.7% 2.0% 1.1% 0.0% 4.8% Appearance of products 3.4% 6.1% 3.8% 2.4% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% High quality 2.6% 1.2% 1.1% 5.2% 3.2% 5.4% 0.8% Window display next to Italian 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.5% 2.8% Taste 1.3% 2.4% 0.0% 2.8% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% There is a certain type of product 0.8% 0.0% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Flour grade, composition 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 2.1% 2.7% 0.0% Italian technology 0.2% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Get ready fast 0.1% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Base for calculations 873 82 284 251 94 37 125 16 N=765
  • 17. Summary ✓ Among those surveyed, 52.5% paid attention to brand D in the shop ✓ At the same time bought a brand D 13.3% of respondents ✓ Most respondents did not choose a brand D because they are not familiar with it (20.56%) or did not notice it on the shelf (12.44%). ✓ Most active brand D purchased by survey participants city_______ and city_______. Least active in the city_______and city_______. ✓ Majority of respondents prefer to buy Italian pasta due to its taste and high quality. In addition consumers appreciate the convenience of packaging, the speed of cooking pasta and the variety of product shapes ✓ For 40.5% of respondents, it is important to buy Italian pasta ✓ Among all respondents 67.6% believe brand D is an Italian brand ✓ Respondents define a pasta brand as Italian based on the information on the packaging (24.6%), brand awareness (16.8%), packaging design (13.4%) and brand name (11.5%) ✓ More than 50% of respondents consider the brand D Italian thanks to its name (in Italian) as well as the design of the packaging, the high price (similar to well-known Italian brands) and the information on the packaging (inscriptions in Italian). ✓ The maximum cost that respondents are willing to pay for "their" brand of pasta is 10 Euro ✓ Consumers are willing to pay the lowest price D (those who consider it Italian) - 8.3 euro. ✓ Among respondents who believe that the brand D is Italian the maximum price for these products was called based on their own capabilities and the usual purchase price (8.3 euro). Thus, the excess over the actual cost is 39.67% (third place after G (56.67%) and F (47.69%) ✓ The reasons why brand D loses competitors (in descending order): ✓ Low awareness of the brand (a fifth of the respondents did not choose the brand for this very reason) ✓ Not Italian "signs” on the packaging and price tags: the country of production is indicated, the logo is placed,other signsstandards (respondents read the back of the packaging) ✓ The habit of "their" brands and inconspicuousness the front side of the package on the shelf (12.44% did not notice the brand) ✓ Packaging design (no Italian flag, not cardboard, does not seem expensive) ✓ Pasta D thicker than Italian 17