Name-       OLIVIA DUTTA

Roll No:-        08

Batch :-     PGDM 2010-2012
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY

              RESEARCH topic

       To study the impact of promotional
       activities on consumers and to find out
       customer satisfaction level with regards
       to Pepsi cola.
OBJECTIVE OF THE
     STUDY
1.     PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

    To know the impact of promotional activities on consumers and to study customer
      satisfaction level with respect to Pepsi

2.     SECONDARY OBJECTIVE

•     Promotional, selling strategies.
•     Effective and successful promotion.
•    Brand awareness level and mind-set of the consumers.
•    Consumer’s perception & expectation.
•    Strength of the competitors.
•    Customer’s repurchase intention.
•    Lost customer analysis.
• TARGET POPULATION

• SAMPLING METHOD

• DATA COLLECTION METHOD

• SOURCES OF DATA COLLECTED

• EVERY DEALER SURVEY (EDS)
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY


Conducting survey in (may-june) peak time of
summer often becomes difficult.
Many respondents refused to answer due to
lack of time.
The data can vary due to climatic factors.
The promotional tools used by SMV Beverages for
          its marketing activities are

• Point of sale display
• Incentives to retailers
• Sales promotion through sponsoring special
  events
• Sales promotion through various schemes
• Advertising
DATA ANALYSIS FOR
    IMPACT OF
   PROMOTION ON
    CONSUMERS
CONSUMER PREFERENCE FOR PEPSI PRODUCTS



20
15
10
 5
 0
     PEPSI      7UP      SLICE   MOUNTAIN   MIRINDA   NIMBOOZ
                                   DEW
CONSUMER PREFERENCE OF COKE PRODUCTS

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0
     THUMPS UP   SPRITE    FANTA     MAZZA   MINUTE MAID   LIMCA
STRENGTH OF COCA-COLA PRODUCTS
                       2%
TASTE        AWARENESS      UNAVAILIBILITY

                  6%




                            92%
BRAND AWARENESS OF CONSUMERS

100
 90
 80
 70
 60
 50
 40
 30
 20
 10
 0
MIND SET OF CONSUMERS ABOUT PROMOTION
              YES   NO




                          28%




      72%
PEOPLE WHO KNOW ABOUT "BRAZIL JAO, CHILL MACHAO"
                                    60




             40




       YES                     NO
SUCCESS OF THE OFFER




     97




                      1                   2
FAKE OFFER   NOT A FAKE OFFER      CAN'T SAY
SUCCESS OF DISCOUNT SCHEMES


60
50
40
30
20
 10
     0


         WOULD BUY DURING DISCOUNTS

                                      WOULD NOT BUY DURING DISCOUNTS
100               SUCCESS OF SLICE LOUNGE CAMPAIGN
 90

 80

 70

 60

 50

 40

 30

 20

 10

 0
      EXCELLENT   VERY GOOD   GOOD   FAIR     POOR
ANALYSIS OF ROI
                COMPARASION OF ROI

                                              40
                25




ROI FOR THE CURRENT YR

                                ROI FOR THE PREVIOUS YR
DATA
ANALYSIS FOR
THE STUDY OF
  CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION
SATISFACTION WITH PEPSI' IMPROVEMENT
                                            70




                           15

           0
                                                            12


VERY DISSATISFIED                                                          3
                    SOMEWHAT
                    DISSATISFIED   NEITHER SATISFIED
                                   NOR DISSATISFIED    SOMEWHAT
                                                        SATISFIED   VERY SATISFIED
PRODUCT AVAILABILITY




      98




                   2


YES           NO
FROM
DEALER’S/RETAILER’S
            SURVEY
53             REASON TO DISCARD PEPSI PRODUCTS


              30




                             2         5            10

SERVICE
          SUPPLY
                      DISTRIBUTOR
                       RELATION     DEMAND
                                              VISI PROBLEM
69



                     BUSINESS INTENTION



                26




                                      5
YES
           NO

                                  MAY BE
Findings
  FOR PROMOTION:
• Consumer preference.
• Low awareness of ‘nimbooz’, ‘lehar soda’, ‘tropicana juice’ and ‘aqaufina’
  as brand of PepsiCo.
• Consumers feel promotion can’t influence customer buying decision.
• Strength of PepsiCo is its heavy promotion.
• Success of promotion.
• Product sale during discount schemes have great scope.
FOR CUSTOMER
          SATISFACTION:

•    Taste.
•   Customer repurchase intention
•   Product innovativeness.
•   Product availability.
•    Service to dealers.
•    Supply
•   Lost customer analysis
SWOT ANALYSIS
       STRENGTH                                                   WEAKNESS
•PepsiCo's presence                                   • Disclosure of schemes
• Broad product line                                  •Product replacement
• Strategic improvements                              • Service
• Attractive schemes                                  • Interior parts of the city over looked
• Advertisement/ promotion                            • Visi cooler
• Able marketing intelligence


      OPPORTUNITY                                                 THREAT
• Adapting to market trends(introduce health          • Intense Competition
drinks).                                              • Decline in C.S.D. Sales
• New product in dust form                            • Health issues & pesticide controversy
•Tetra packs for all brands to target kids segment.   • Environmental affairs
• Cartoon character packaging for kids
                                                      • Threat from indigenous drinks
• sugar free range of products
• Focus upon interior areas
• Huge market potential
RECOMMENDATION
• Another brand of cola flavour
• Nimbooz, tropicana juice, lehar
  soda, aquafina(water) needs more promotion
• Avoidance of invalid codes in promotion
(LOSS OF BRAND IMAGE)
• Service to dealers
• Promotion through brand ambassadors
• Focus on lost customers
• More emphasis on retailers
REFERENCES
•   www.pepsizone.com
•   www.pepsiindia.com
•   www.pepsico.com
•   www.Wikipedia.com
•   Magazines(marketing management 4P’s)
•   Marketing Management ;PHILIP KOTLER
THANK YOU

SUMMER INTERNSHIP PPT

  • 1.
    Name- OLIVIA DUTTA Roll No:- 08 Batch :- PGDM 2010-2012
  • 3.
    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY RESEARCH topic To study the impact of promotional activities on consumers and to find out customer satisfaction level with regards to Pepsi cola.
  • 4.
    OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY 1. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To know the impact of promotional activities on consumers and to study customer satisfaction level with respect to Pepsi 2. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE • Promotional, selling strategies. • Effective and successful promotion. • Brand awareness level and mind-set of the consumers. • Consumer’s perception & expectation. • Strength of the competitors. • Customer’s repurchase intention. • Lost customer analysis.
  • 5.
    • TARGET POPULATION •SAMPLING METHOD • DATA COLLECTION METHOD • SOURCES OF DATA COLLECTED • EVERY DEALER SURVEY (EDS)
  • 6.
    LIMITATIONS OF THESTUDY Conducting survey in (may-june) peak time of summer often becomes difficult. Many respondents refused to answer due to lack of time. The data can vary due to climatic factors.
  • 7.
    The promotional toolsused by SMV Beverages for its marketing activities are • Point of sale display • Incentives to retailers • Sales promotion through sponsoring special events • Sales promotion through various schemes • Advertising
  • 10.
    DATA ANALYSIS FOR IMPACT OF PROMOTION ON CONSUMERS
  • 11.
    CONSUMER PREFERENCE FORPEPSI PRODUCTS 20 15 10 5 0 PEPSI 7UP SLICE MOUNTAIN MIRINDA NIMBOOZ DEW
  • 12.
    CONSUMER PREFERENCE OFCOKE PRODUCTS 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 THUMPS UP SPRITE FANTA MAZZA MINUTE MAID LIMCA
  • 13.
    STRENGTH OF COCA-COLAPRODUCTS 2% TASTE AWARENESS UNAVAILIBILITY 6% 92%
  • 14.
    BRAND AWARENESS OFCONSUMERS 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
  • 15.
    MIND SET OFCONSUMERS ABOUT PROMOTION YES NO 28% 72%
  • 16.
    PEOPLE WHO KNOWABOUT "BRAZIL JAO, CHILL MACHAO" 60 40 YES NO
  • 17.
    SUCCESS OF THEOFFER 97 1 2 FAKE OFFER NOT A FAKE OFFER CAN'T SAY
  • 18.
    SUCCESS OF DISCOUNTSCHEMES 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 WOULD BUY DURING DISCOUNTS WOULD NOT BUY DURING DISCOUNTS
  • 19.
    100 SUCCESS OF SLICE LOUNGE CAMPAIGN 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD FAIR POOR
  • 20.
    ANALYSIS OF ROI COMPARASION OF ROI 40 25 ROI FOR THE CURRENT YR ROI FOR THE PREVIOUS YR
  • 21.
    DATA ANALYSIS FOR THE STUDYOF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
  • 22.
    SATISFACTION WITH PEPSI'IMPROVEMENT 70 15 0 12 VERY DISSATISFIED 3 SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED NEITHER SATISFIED NOR DISSATISFIED SOMEWHAT SATISFIED VERY SATISFIED
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    53 REASON TO DISCARD PEPSI PRODUCTS 30 2 5 10 SERVICE SUPPLY DISTRIBUTOR RELATION DEMAND VISI PROBLEM
  • 26.
    69 BUSINESS INTENTION 26 5 YES NO MAY BE
  • 27.
    Findings FORPROMOTION: • Consumer preference. • Low awareness of ‘nimbooz’, ‘lehar soda’, ‘tropicana juice’ and ‘aqaufina’ as brand of PepsiCo. • Consumers feel promotion can’t influence customer buying decision. • Strength of PepsiCo is its heavy promotion. • Success of promotion. • Product sale during discount schemes have great scope.
  • 28.
    FOR CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: • Taste. • Customer repurchase intention • Product innovativeness. • Product availability. • Service to dealers. • Supply • Lost customer analysis
  • 29.
    SWOT ANALYSIS STRENGTH WEAKNESS •PepsiCo's presence • Disclosure of schemes • Broad product line •Product replacement • Strategic improvements • Service • Attractive schemes • Interior parts of the city over looked • Advertisement/ promotion • Visi cooler • Able marketing intelligence OPPORTUNITY THREAT • Adapting to market trends(introduce health • Intense Competition drinks). • Decline in C.S.D. Sales • New product in dust form • Health issues & pesticide controversy •Tetra packs for all brands to target kids segment. • Environmental affairs • Cartoon character packaging for kids • Threat from indigenous drinks • sugar free range of products • Focus upon interior areas • Huge market potential
  • 30.
    RECOMMENDATION • Another brandof cola flavour • Nimbooz, tropicana juice, lehar soda, aquafina(water) needs more promotion • Avoidance of invalid codes in promotion (LOSS OF BRAND IMAGE) • Service to dealers • Promotion through brand ambassadors • Focus on lost customers • More emphasis on retailers
  • 32.
    REFERENCES • www.pepsizone.com • www.pepsiindia.com • www.pepsico.com • www.Wikipedia.com • Magazines(marketing management 4P’s) • Marketing Management ;PHILIP KOTLER
  • 33.