Geraldine and Gaggero's relationship had been acceptable until September 21, 2002. On this date, Marsha confronted Gaggero about the unprofitability of the business. Gaggero then counterattacked and blamed Geraldine and Marsha for issues that were the responsibility of others in order to cover up his own manipulations. Gaggero's subsequent letters and declarations from witnesses in support of a restraining order were found to be inaccurate and fabricated in an attempt to prepare for upcoming legal action and avoid being served.

1. SUMMARY OF RESTRAINING ORDER INCIDENT.
1.RELATIONS BETWEEN GERALDINE AND GAGGERO HAD
BEEN ACCEPTABLE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 21, 2002.
2, ON THAT DATE, MARSHA CONFRONTS GAGGERO WITH
THE UNPLEASANT REALITY. THE PROFITABILITY IS A
DISASTER.
3. GAGGERO, TO COVER HIS TRACKS AND HIDE THE
MANIPULATION HE HAD DONE ON RGA AND CANTY,
COUNTERATTACKED AND PICKED ON GERALDINE AND
MARSHA FOR HORSE STALL SCHEDULE (WHICH SHOULD
HAVE BEEN DONE BY CANTY), AND BOOKKEEPING.

2. 4. GAGGERO, AN EXTREMELY COMPETENT AND
EXPERIENCED BUSINESSMAN, KNOWS THAT HIS
INTERPRETATION OF THE RGA CLAUSE IS A FRAUD AND A
SHAM. HE NEVER THOUGHT IT WOULD COME TO THE
SURFACE.
5. GAGGERO TRIES TO BRING THE REDMONDS TO A FURTHER
MEETING PRIOR TO THE AVAILABILITY OF BOOKKEEPING,
TO FORCE AN AGREEMENT.
6. HIS SEPTEMBER 28, 2002 LETTER IS MOSTLY
INACCURACIES AND FABRICATIONS. THE LETTER IS AN
OBVIOUS ATTEMPT TO PREPARE FOR THE FORTHCOMING
LEGAL ACTION.

3. 7. THE DECLARATIONS OF GAGGERO, CHATFIELD, ETC. FOR
THE R.O. ARE ONCE AGAIN, INACCURATE, BIASED AND FROM
HOSTILE WITNESSES.
8. GERALDINE’S NOTES ON GAGGERO’S ATTEMPT TO AVOID
BEING SERVED WITH R.O. IS REVEALING. WE KNOW
GAGGERO’S OBSESSION WITH SECRECY. WHY?