The document discusses organizational design and the factors that lead to success and failure. It describes organizational design as a methodology to identify and realign dysfunctional work processes and structures according to business goals. There are six main organizational structure types - simple, functional, divisional, matrix, team and network - that a company may choose between based on its needs. Failures can result from not defining objectives clearly, structuring around people instead of goals, causing too much disruption, or bypassing processes. Successes stem from well-defined reporting relationships, efficient information flow, quick decision making, and adaptability providing competitive advantages.

1. SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF
ORGANISATIONAL DESIGN
 SUBJECT: ORGANISATIONAL DESIGN
 NAME: R. SAKTHIMANOJ
 SECTION: “B”
 REGISTRATION NO: RA1952001020108

2. Organizational Design
 Organizational design is a step-by-step
methodology which identifies dysfunctional
aspects of work flow, procedures, structures and
systems, realigns them to fit current business
realities/goals and then develops plans to
implement the new changes. ... A clear strategy
for managing and growing your business.

3. Organizational design and structure

4. Different types of organizational
design :
 The six most common approaches
to organizational design include simple,
functional, divisional, matrix, team and
network designs. A company will choose
their organizational structure based on their
needs.

5. Simple organizational structure:

6. Functional organizational structure :

7. Divisional organizational structure:

8. Matrix organizational structure:

9. Network organizational structure:

10. Failures of organizational design :
 Not knowing what you are trying to achieve.
 Structuring an organization for specific personnel.
 Causing more disruption than needed.
 Making decisions and/or having sidebar agreements outside of
the agreed-upon process.
 Skipping current state assessment.
 Breaking the circle of confidentiality.
 Bypassing a formal change management and communications
plan.

11. Success of organizational design:
 Clarity in reporting relationships.
 Better information flows .
 Quick decision-making.
 Increasing operational efficiency.
 Growth opportunities than more loosely designed
companies.
 Facilitates quick adaptability to gain competitive
advantages.
 High-performing employees.

12. THANK YOU