SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 85
Download to read offline
2 0 1 5 A N A L Y S T D A Y
Delivering Better Energy
This presentation contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding SolarCity’s business strategies; our operational growth and expansion opportunities; our
international expansion plans, including our expectations as to lower global module pricing and labor costs outside the United States; the deployment and installation of megawatts, including estimated Q4 2015 and
2016 megawatt installations; future bookings; financial strategies for cash generation and increasing shareholder value; forecasted cash flows from existing Energy Contracts, including related assumptions as to
energy production future operations and maintenance expenses, cancellation rates, renewal rates, default rates, amounts of performance based incentives and other identified assumptions; our projections related to
decreases in cost per Watt, including our plans to decrease our sales cost per Watt by eliminating higher cost channels, utilizing more efficient channels, and other initiatives, the impact of proprietary technology in
decreasing our installation costs, our expectations regarding future hardware pricing, our expectations regarding the maturing efficiency of our operations centers, and our plans to vertically integrate our commercial
product offerings along with related projections regarding installation efficiencies and cost savings; our plans to achieve manufacturing economies of scale and associated manufacturing cost reductions; our
expectations regarding the Riverbend agreement and the development and construction of the Riverbend facility, including our projection that the facility will be completed and ready to commence operations by Q2
2016, our expectations regarding capital and operating expenses and the performance of our manufacturing operations; our expectations as to future regulatory and policy outcomes affecting our industry, including
our belief as to the likelihood of an extension of the Federal Investment Tax Credit and the continued adoption and extension of net-energy metering programs; our projections regarding hypothetical cash flows and
tax equity transactions following the schedule step-down in the Federal Investment Tax Credit; our projections regarding the future pricing of utility-generated electricity and customer savings; our liquidity and
forecasted access to capital, including assumptions related to the terms of future financing (including risk premiums and interest rates), the sufficiency of committed available financing, the terms and frequency of
future securities offerings (including securitization offerings and our expectation that the risk premium of future securitized offerings will decrease consistent with that of mortgages) and our expectations regarding the
refinancing of existing debt obligations, including our short-term Solar Bonds; the amount of megawatts that can be installed and deployed based on committed available financing; the success of our product
development efforts and customer preferences, including the potential and performance of residential and commercial energy storage products and other new product offerings; and assumptions relating to the
foregoing.
Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be
achieved, if at all. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking
statements. In order to meet our projections, we will need to expand our workforce and increase the efficiency of our sales and installation operations relative to what we have achieved to date. Additional key risks
and uncertainties include the effect of electric utility industry regulations, net metering and related policies; the availability and amount of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives; the level of demand for our
solar energy systems; the availability of a sufficient, timely, and cost-effective supply of solar panels and balance of system components in each of our geographies; our ability to successfully integrate acquired
businesses, operations and personnel; our ability to achieve manufacturing economies of scale and associated cost reductions, our expectations regarding the Riverbend agreement and the development and
construction of the Riverbend facility, including expected capital and operating expenses and the performance of our manufacturing operations; the effects of existing and future tariffs and other trade barriers;
changes in federal tax treatment; the availability and amount of financing from fund investors; the retail price of utility-generated electricity or the availability of alternative energy sources; risks associated with
SolarCity’s rapid growth; risks associated with international expansion; the success of our product development efforts and customer preferences; risks that consumers who have executed energy contracts may
seek to cancel those contracts; assumptions as to the value under energy contracts and contract renewal rates and terms, including applicable net present values, performance-based incentives, and other rebates,
credits and expenses; SolarCity’s limited operating history, particularly as a new public company; changes in strategic planning decisions by management or reallocation of internal resources; and general market,
political, economic and business conditions. You should read the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and subsequent Current Reports on Form 8-K, which have been
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which identify certain of these and additional risks and uncertainties. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.
Forward-Looking Statements
2
B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S
L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y
V A L U E O F A S S E T S
M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S
V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S
P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S
O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E
I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y
G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3
Strategy Update
 Organic origination of long-term Energy Contracts at lower acquisition costs
 Best-in-class installation costs through proprietary technology
 Monetization of a higher portion of the value of our Energy Contracts through low-cost,
long duration financing
 Exploring monetization of the full value of some Energy Contracts
 Be a catalyst in de-carbonizing the energy infrastructure
4
Introduction: Business Drivers and Metrics
Leadership of a Growing
Opportunity
Monetization of Energy Contracts
and Creation of Asset Value
Investment in Best-in
Class Technology
Metric Unit 2014 2015
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
U.S. Power Capacity:
U.S. Installed Generating Capacity GW-AC 1,161 1,169 1,172 1,177 1,182 1,171 1,176
Distributed Solar as % of U.S. Generating Capacity % 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9%
U.S. Installed Distributed Solar Capacity GW-DC 6.7 7.3 7.9 8.6 9.2 10.0 10.8
New U.S. Installed Distributed Solar Capacity MW-DC 483 564 559 719 682 697 796
SCTY Units:
SCTY % of New U.S. Distributed Solar Capacity % 17% 19% 25% 25% 22% 27% 32%
MW Installed MW 82 107 138 177 153 189 256
MW Deployed MW 82 107 137 176 143 177 205
MW PTO'd MW 83 79 113 138 160 156 203
Energy Contract Pricing of New Deployments (Yr. 1) $/kWh $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.13 $0.13 $0.13
Annual Escalator % 1.7% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2%
SREC (5-Yr. Portfolio Average) $/kWh $0.01 $0.01 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02
Energy Harvest (Yr. 1) kWh/kW 1,425 1,416 1,406 1,402 1,404 1,379 1,352
Value Generation and Monetization:
Asset Financing in Period (including rebates)* $/W $2.69 $2.04 $2.62 $2.28 $2.35 $2.33 $3.20
Contracted Value of MW Deployed in Period † $/W $3.68 $3.55 $3.37 $3.24 $3.44 $3.49 $3.50
Renewal Value of MW Deployed in Period † $/W $0.38 $0.40 $0.38 $0.34 $0.33 $0.34 $0.36
Total Value of MW Deployed in Period $/W $4.06 $3.95 $3.74 $3.58 $3.77 $3.83 $3.86
Cost per Watt**:
Sales $/W $0.51 $0.47 $0.49 $0.57 $0.59 $0.53 $0.64
Installation $/W $2.44 $2.28 $2.19 $2.09 $2.09 $2.13 $1.92
G&A $/W $0.30 $0.26 $0.21 $0.20 $0.27 $0.24 $0.27
Total Cost per Watt $/W $3.25 $3.01 $2.89 $2.86 $2.95 $2.91 $2.84
R&D Expenses $M ($1.9) ($3.0) ($4.2) ($10.0) ($12.1) ($12.4) ($17.7)
Capital Expenditures $M ($4.7) ($2.9) ($5.8) ($9.5) ($30.5) ($71.6) ($45.7)
Change in Working Capital Q/Q $M $28.3 $22.7 $37.0 ($38.1) ($72.3) ($31.7) ($41.7)
Debt and Cash:
Debt - Recourse $M ($176.6) ($349.8) ($165.2) ($149.7) ($290.6) ($419.2) ($518.2)
Debt - Convertible $M ($230.0) ($230.0) ($730.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) ($796.0)
Cash & Short-Term Investments $M $526.2 $429.6 $756.8 $663.6 $586.2 $497.6 $438.7
Current Portfolio Value
Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV Remaining of Cumulative MW Deployed (1.5 GW) $M $2,708
Debt – Non-Recourse $M ($995)
Net NPV of Cumulative MW Deployed
$M $1,713
Proprietary Origination at Lower Cost
Operating Cost Excellence
5
* Weighted average of Q1-Q3 2015 Asset Financing is $2.68
** Cost per Watt is based on our quarterly cost calculation methodology we detail on our website
† Updated since original report
B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S
L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y
V A L U E O F A S S E T S
M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S
V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S
P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S
O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E
I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y
G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
6
Solar Represents a Plurality of New U.S. Power Capacity
Total U.S. Installed Generating Capacity is ~1,170 GW with 15-20 GW/Yr. of New Gross Capacity since 2010
Distributed Solar Accounted for 22% of New-Build U.S. Generating Capacity in 1H15 with Utility-Scale at 23%
1,110
1,120
1,130
1,140
1,150
1,160
1,170
1,180
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
TotalInstalledCapacity(GW)
New-BuildCapacity(GW)
New Build U.S. Generating Capacity
U.S. Total Installed Capacity
3% 5% 5%
11% 12%
22%
1%
3% 6%
17%
21%
23%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1H15
%ofNew-BuildU.S.GeneratingCapacity
Utility-Scale Solar
0.6
1.1
1.6
1.9
2.3
1.4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1H15
GWInstalled
>20% of New U.S. Capacity was
Distributed Solar in 1H152
U.S. Distributed Solar Grew at a 40% CAGR
2010 to 20143
15-20 GW of New U.S. Generating
Capacity per Year1
7
Distributed
Solar is Competitive in a Significant Portion of the U.S.
Avg. U.S. Retail Electricity Price Is ~$0.13/kWh with 583 TWh Consumed at that Price or Higher4
Total U.S. Residential and Commercial Electricity Sales ≥$0.13/kWh Exceeded $90 Billion in 2014
0
100
200
300
400
500
< $0.08 < $0.09 < $0.10 < $0.11 < $0.12 < $0.13 < $0.14 < $0.16 < $0.18 < $0.20 > $0.20
U.S.ResidentialandCommercial
ElectricityConsumption(TWh)
Average Retail Utility Price ($/kWh)
NY
MA
NC
CT
AZGA CA
MDTX
FL PA HI
SolarCity Service States
Non-SolarCity Service States
8
Retail Utility Rates Are Rising on Infrastructure Spending
Retail Utility Rates Have Increased despite Lower Energy Prices Due to Infrastructure Capex
CA Rate Reform is Increasing Investor-Owned Utilities’ Baseline Tier 1 Residential Rates Initially to >$0.17/kWh in 2017
$0.06
$0.08
$0.10
$0.12
$0.14
$0.16
$0.18
2004 2009 2014
Avg.ResidentialUtilityRate
($/kWh)
$0.15 $0.16 $0.17$0.17
$0.20
$0.23
$0.20 $0.21
$0.25
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
SCE PG&E SDG&E
ResidentialUtilityRates($/kWh)
Old Tier One (1H15) Tier One (2017)* Tier One (2019)*U.S. Avg.Avg. in Our 19 States
New CA Rate Reform Increasing Tier One Rates6Utility Rates in SolarCity Geographies Are Up 49% since 20045
* Assumes 3% Additional Annual Rate Inflation
3.4% CAGR
4.1% CAGR
9
Cleaner, Lower Cost Energy
Solar PPAs, Leases, and Loans Lower Customers’ Energy Bills for No Initial Investment
 No upfront cost for installation required
 Solar energy paid for monthly at a lower $/kWh price than charged
by the local utility
 Our solar contracts typically generate 50-90% of a customer’s
annual electricity needs
 Customers able to generate savings of up to 20% from Day One
Avg. Annual Year-1
Savings Of > $400 in
California
SOLARCITY EXAMPLE OF A CALIFORNIA PPA WITH NO DOWN PAYMENT
SolarCity Bill
New Utility Bill
New Avg. Bill
~$1,848 /Yr.
Old Avg. Bill
~$2,256 /Yr.
$0.15/kWh
$0.15-0.19/kWh*$0.19/kWh
* Because of tiered pricing based on usage in California, the output from solar energy systems also lowers the rate charged by the utility
10
SolarCity
U.S. Service
Territories
Total U.S.
Total U.S. Residential Solar
Installations at the End of Q2 2015 7 0.68M 0.73M
/ Total U.S. Single Family Housing
Units 8 41.3M 92.2M
= Distributed Solar Penetration of
U.S. Single-Family Homes
1.7% 0.8%
Despite Continued Growth, Solar Penetration Remains Low
U.S. Solar Penetration of Both Residential and Commercial Buildings Is Below 1%
Residential Solar Is Installed on Only 1.7% of Single Family Homes in SolarCity’s U.S. Service Territories
 Over 733k residential solar homes in the United States
as of the end of Q2 2015 with ~190k new residential
installations in 2014.7
 635k new single-family home permits across the Country
in 2014, expanding the opportunity.9
 Less than 1% solar penetration of the 5.6M commercial
buildings in the U.S.10
11
The Clear Leader in U.S. Distributed Solar Installations
SolarCity is the Largest U.S. Residential and Commercial Solar Installer
Installed 28% of Distributed Solar, 15% of Total Solar, and 7% of New Gross Power Capacity in the U.S. 1Q-3Q15
3%
6% 6%
5%
7% 7%
22%
7%
8%
11%
17%
25%
33%
37%
11% 10%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15 SCTY 3Q15 Resi
Installer No. 2
3Q15 Resi
Installer No. 3
%ofU.S.DistributedSolarInstalled11
Commercial Residential
SolarCity accounted for more than 1% of all solar installed globally this year
22%
32%
Blended
12
Potential to Expand SolarCity’s Core Expertise Globally
 Acquired ILIOSS for $10M in Aug. 2015
 Strong track record with major Mexican corporations
SOLARCITY IS NOW A LEADING C&I INSTALLER IN MEXICO
 International opportunities expected to benefit from lower global module
pricing and lower labor costs outside the United States
 Exploring partnerships with potential long-term asset owners
Example Countries Australia Chile Italy Kenya
Residential Utility
Rates ($/kWh)
$0.23 $0.15 $0.26 $0.24
Commercial Utility
Rates ($/kWh)
$0.16 $0.09 $0.19 $0.10
Solar Insolation
(kWh/kW)
~1,500 ~1,800 ~1,200 ~1,400
EXPLORING MORE FOREIGN OPPORTUNITIES12
13
Regulatory Update
 The California Public Utilities Commission’s forthcoming
decision on NEM 2.0 is expected to not significantly affect
economics for new customers, as state law requires that
the new tariff ensure that customer-sited DG “continues to
grow sustainably”
 New York removed its NEM cap through 12/31/16 while a
comprehensive docket called Reforming the Energy Vision
(REV) seeks to appropriately value distributed solar/clean
energy
 Though Hawaii’s public utilities commission capped the
state’s NEM program at existing levels, Hawaii is a unique
state that (a) already has double-digit rooftop solar
penetration and (b) has a very high cost of energy with
wholesale rates above the cost of distributed solar
 In Arizona, utility SRP’s implementation of anti-solar rate
design changes for new installations is being challenged in
Arizona federal court
 Extension growing increasingly likely as we
approach the step-down in the ITC from 30%
to 10% on 1/1/17
 Nevertheless, we are approaching our
business assuming no extension
STATE NET ENERGY METERING (NEM) POLICIES FEDERAL INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT (ITC)
14
Regulators Are Continuing Net Energy Metering
Regulators Tend to View Distributed Solar Positively Because Its Benefits Outweigh Its Costs
State-developed mandatory
rules for certain utilities
No uniform or statewide mandatory
rules but some utilities allow
No net energy metering
State-developed net energy
metering rules ended for new customers
15
B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S
L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y
V A L U E O F A S S E T S
M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S
V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S
P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S
O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E
I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y
G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
16
Project Cash Flow Driven by Units, Production, and Pricing
Solar Insolation
Annual hours of sunshine on the panels adjusted
for tilt and azimuth
X
System Size Capacity (kW or MW)
=
Annual Energy Production
Estimated kilowatt-hours (kWh) of solar energy
produced in year one
X
$0.13/kWh ( Energy Contract Price
All the energy produced by the solar system is
sold to the customer at an established $/kWh
price with an annual escalator (includes
performance-based incentives)
+ +
$0.035/kWh
SREC Price )
Portfolio average, e.g.,
$0 in California
Certain states require non-renewable energy
generators to purchase Solar Renewable Energy
Certificates to meet state renewable energy
portfolio standards
= =
$1,486
(or $0.22/W)
Energy Contract
Revenue
Annual revenue is the customer bill plus
payments for SRECs. Customers contract for 20
years and we expect to provide energy to the
home for at least 30 years
1,332 Hours
260W x 26 Panels
= 6.8kW
9,004 kWh
751 Avg. FICO
Investment-grade off-taker
BILL
SREC
*
*Average of 3Q15 Lease/PPA Deployed; Q315 average including MyPower is 1,352 hours
17
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Energy Production kWh/kW 1,332 1,325 1,319 1,312 1,306 1,299 1,293 1,286 1,280 1,273 1,267 1,261 1,254 1,248 1,242 1,236 1,229 1,223 1,217 1,211
Annual Degradation (0.5%)
Contract (+PBI) Price $/kWh $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 $0.14 $0.14 $0.14 $0.14 $0.15 $0.15 $0.15 $0.16 $0.16 $0.17 $0.17 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20
Annual Escalator 2.2%
SREC $/kWh $0.04 $0.03 $0.03 $0.02 $0.01
Rebates/Prepayments $/W $0.10
Project Revenue $/W $0.22 $0.21 $0.21 $0.20 $0.20 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.24
O&M Expenses $/W ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.18) ($0.02) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03)
Gross Project Cash Flow $/W $0.10 $0.20 $0.19 $0.19 $0.18 $0.17 $0.16 $0.16 $0.17 $0.17 $0.17 $0.02 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21
Year 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30**
Energy Production 1,205 1,199 1,193 1,187 1,181 1,175 1,169 1,163 1,158 1,152
Annual Degradation
Contract (+PBI) Price $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23
Annual Escalator
SREC
Project Revenue $0.22 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.25 $0.25 $0.26 $0.26 $0.27
O&M Expenses ($0.15) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.04) ($0.04) ($0.04)
Gross Project Cash Flow $0.07 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23
Gross Project Cash Flows (Pre-ITC) Valued at $2.56/W NPV
The Foundation of Our Value Creation Rests Upon the Cash Flow Stream of the Underlying Assets
Q3 2015 NPV of Lease/PPA Gross Project Cash Flows before the Investment Tax Credit/Depreciation Was $2.56/W at a 6% Discount Rate
$/W UNIT ECONOMICS FOR THE 172 MW OF LEASES/PPAS DEPLOYED IN Q3 2015:
30-Year NPV: $2.56/W
 Rebates/Prepayments: $0.10/W (upfront)
 Contracted NPV: $2.02/W (discounted at 6%)
 Renewal NPV: $0.44/W (discounted at 6%)
* Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W
** Renewal assumes SolarCity continues to provide energy to the home at a 10% discount to the utility price at the time of renewal
Note: Excludes default rates
In aggregate, the lease/PPA MW Deployed in Q3 2015
are expected to generate unlevered Gross Project Cash
Flow (pre-tax equity distributions) of ~$34M in Year One
(172 MW x $0.20/W)
Excludes MyPower MW Deployed (See Appendix A)
18
Tax Equity Primer
$/W $/W % of Return
Cash Investment in Project ($1.77)
Investment Tax Credit offsetting
income tax
$1.36 65%
Depreciation offsetting income tax over life of
partnership
$0.29 14%
Cash Flow from project $0.46 22%
Total Nominal Return $2.11 100%
 The Investment Tax Credit (ITC) available under Section 48 of the IRC currently includes a 30%
tax credit for solar systems on residential and commercial properties, which is scheduled to be
reduced to 10% after December 31, 2016.
 While the current ITC focuses primarily on renewable energy property, various iterations of the
ITC have existed since 1962, and over its history the ITC has been used by Congress to spur
investment in a multitude of industries.
 ITC is part of broader General Business Credit under Section 38 that provides tax credits to
various asset types, including low income housing, new markets, carbon sequestration,
marginal oil wells, and dozens of other industries.
HISTORY ECONOMICS
 Pool of sophisticated investors comprised of leading financial institutions and corporates
investing for an attractive risk adjusted return
 Investor base continues to expand as asset class matures
INVESTOR BASE
SELECT TAX EQUITY INVESTORS
 Partnership with SolarCity as 1% Member and Tax Equity as 99% Member
 Investment structured with projected “flip” and tenor 6.5 years
 Tax Equity partner receives the ITC, accelerated depreciation benefits and a share of cash flow
 After Tax Equity partner reaches a target IRR, their partnership interest flips down to 5% and
SolarCity can exercise a buyout of the Tax Equity’s interest
PARTNERSHIP STRUCTURE
% Benefit to Tax Equity Partner
Pre-Flip Post-Flip
ITC / Depreciation 99% 0%
Cash Flow 30-40% 5-10%
 After-tax IRR 7% to 12%; pre-tax cash IRR 2% to 5%
 Tax Equity partner funds $1.75-1.80 / W ($4.55 Fair Market Value * 30% ITC * 1.28 funding
multiple)
 Return is comprised of 65% ITC, 14% depreciation, 22% cash flow
19
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 15
Gross Project Cash Flow $0.10 $0.20 $0.19 $0.19 $0.18 $0.17 $0.16 $0.16 $0.17 $0.17 $0.17 $0.02 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19
Tax Equity Investment $1.77
Tax Equity Distributions ($0.07) ($0.07) ($0.07) ($0.06) ($0.06) ($0.06) ($0.05) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01)
Unlevered Project Cash Flow to SCTY $1.87 $0.13 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.11 $0.10 $0.11 $0.15 $0.16 $0.16 $0.01 $0.17 $0.17 $0.17 $0.18
SCTY Share of Cash Flow 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 67% 92% 92% 92% 51% 93% 93% 93% 93%
Tax Equity Share of Cash Flow 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 33% 8% 8% 8% 49% 7% 7% 7% 7%
Year 16 17 18 19 20 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30**
Gross Project Cash Flow $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.07 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23
Tax Equity Distributions ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02)
Unlevered Project Cash Flow to SCTY $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.06 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22
SCTY Share of Cash Flow 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 82% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93%
Tax Equity Share of Cash Flow 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 18% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7%
Unlevered Cash Flow After-Tax Equity Valued at $3.87/W***
In Addition, Tax Equity Enables the Monetization of the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) in Year One
Tax Equity Invests $1.75-1.80/W in Return for a Portion of Gross Project Cash Flow and Most of the 30% ITC/Depreciation
30-Year Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV: $3.87/W
 Tax equity investment: $1.77/W (upfront)
 Rebates/Customer prepayments: $0.10/W (upfront)
 Contracted Unlevered NPV: $1.59/W (discounted at 6%)
 Renewal Unlevered NPV: $0.41/W (discounted at 6%)
* Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W
** Renewal assumes SolarCity continues to provide energy to the home at a 10% discount to the price at the time of renewal
*** Unlevered Cash Flow Value of $3.87/W on this slide only includes Leases/PPAs; the $3.86/W reference on Slide 5 is a blend including MyPower
Note: Excludes default rates
UNLEVERED PROJECT CASH FLOW OF LEASES/PPAS WITH A 30% ITC Tax Equity Share of Cash Flows:
 Pre-Flip: 30-40%
 Post-Flip: 5-10%
20
Levering Cash Flows Yields $2.76 upfront
Non-Recourse Project Debt Is Used to Help Fund the Upfront Investment and Target Day One Cash
Aggregation Facility Debt Currently Funds $0.80-0.90/W and Is Expected to Be Refinanced with Long-Term ABS Debt
30-Year Pre-Tax NPV: $3.87/W
 Tax equity investment: $1.77/W (upfront)
 Rebates/Customer prepayments: $0.10/W (upfront)
 Debt monetization: $0.89/W (upfront)
 Contracted Levered NPV: $0.70/W
 Renewal Levered NPV: $0.41/W
* Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W
** Aggregation Facility debt assumes the terms of current aggregation facilities (2-yr. maturity)
*** Assumes ABS debt is issued to refinance the aggregation facility debt after two years, an 18-year amortization period, and the average interest rate of our first 4 ABS
issuances of 4.5% (the most recent LMC-4 issuance was at 4.4% including fees)
Note: Excludes default rates
LEVERED PROJECT CASH FLOW WITH A 30% ITC
$/W 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14
Unlevered Project Cash Flow $1.87 $0.13 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.11 $0.10 $0.11 $0.15 $0.16 $0.16 $0.01 $0.17 $0.17 $0.17
Aggregation Facility Proceeds/Paydown** $0.89 ($0.05) ($0.84)
Aggregation Facility Debt Service** 2.75% ($0.02) ($0.02)
Expected ABS Debt Proceeds*** $0.97
ABS Debt Service*** 4.50% ($0.08) ($0.08) ($0.08) ($0.07) ($0.07) ($0.10) ($0.10) ($0.11) ($0.11) ($0.11) ($0.11) ($0.10)
Levered Project Cash Flow $2.76 $0.05 $0.24 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04 $0.03 $0.04 $0.05 $0.05 $0.05 ($0.10) $0.06 $0.06 $0.07
$/W 15 16 17 18 19 20 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Unlevered Project Cash Flow $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.06 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22
Aggregation Facility Proceeds/Paydown**
Aggregation Facility Debt Service**
Expected ABS Debt Proceeds***
ABS Debt Service*** ($0.11) ($0.11) ($0.10) ($0.03)
Levered Project Cash Flow $0.07 $0.08 $0.08 $0.16 $0.19 $0.20 $0.06 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22
21
>50% of Value Is Monetized Upfront and the Rest Retained
* Unlevered contracted cash flow net of operations and maintenance expenses and tax equity distributions
** Non-recourse aggregation facility debt issuance at a 56% advance rate and a 2.5-3.0% interest rate with the
potential to subsequently term out through ABS debt at a 66% advance rate and a 4.5-5.0% interest rate
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
$4.00
Total Value of MW
Deployed
Upfront Cash Remaining Value not
Monetized Upfront
$perWatt
Tax Equity
Investment
Plus Rebates/
Prepayments:
$1.87/W
Contracted
Post-Tax
Equity:
$1.59/W* Debt
Monetization:
$0.89/W**
Renewal:
$0.41/W
Renewal:
$0.41/W
$3.87/W
Retention of
Contract
$0.70/W
Renewal: $0.41/W
Unlevered Sale of
Contract $0.55/W
Tax Equity
Investment
Plus Rebates/
Prepayments:
$1.87/W
$2.76/W
Retention of approximately
1/3 of contract value and 100% of
renewal
>50% of total value and 56% of
contracted value monetized
upfront at 2.5-3.0%, and ultimately
66% in securitizations at 4.5-5.0%
6%
Discount rate
6%
Discount rate
22
Hypothetical Unlevered Cash Flow with a 10% ITC of ~$3.32/W
With a 10% ITC, Tax Equity Investment Could Fall to $0.45-0.50/W and Pre-Flip Distributions to ~10%
Offsetting the Decline in the ITC from 30% to 10%, We Expect Contract Pricing to Be Higher By ~$0.02/kWh by 2017
30-Year Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV: $3.32/W
 Tax equity investment: $0.48/W (upfront)
 Rebates/Customer prepayments: $0.10/W (upfront)
 Contract NPV: $2.23/W (discounted at 6%)
 Renewal NPV: $0.52/W (discounted at 6%)
* Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W
** Renewal assumes SolarCity continues to provide energy to the home at a 10% discount to the price at the time of renewal
Note: Excludes default rates
HYPOTHETICAL UNLEVERED PROJECT CASH FLOW OF LEASES/PPAS WITH A 10% ITC
23
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 15
Gross Project Cash Flow $0.22 $0.22 $0.21 $0.21 $0.20 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.06 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22 $0.23
Customer Preyaments/State Rebates $0.10
Tax Equity Investment $0.48
Tax Equity Distributions ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00)
Unlevered Project Cash Flow $0.58 $0.20 $0.20 $0.19 $0.19 $0.18 $0.17 $0.18 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.05 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22
SCTY Share of Cash Flow 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 91% 98% 98% 98% 93% 98% 98% 98%
Tax Equity Share of Cash Flow 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 9% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Year 16 17 18 19 20 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30**
Gross Project Cash Flow $0.23 $0.24 $0.24 $0.25 $0.25 $0.11 $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.25 $0.25 $0.26 $0.26 $0.27 $0.27
Tax Equity Distributions ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.01) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01)
Unlevered Project Cash Flow $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.24 $0.25 $0.10 $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.24 $0.25 $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 $0.27
SCTY Share of Cash Flow 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 96% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%
Tax Equity Share of Cash Flow 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Multiple Options to Monetize Unlevered Cash Flows
$/W 30% ITC 10% ITC
Upfront Asset Financing:
Tax Equity Investment $1.77/W $0.48/W
Rebates & Prepayments $0.10/W $0.10/W
Aggregation Facility Debt $0.89/W $1.26/W
Total Upfront Asset Financing $2.76/W $1.84/W
Remaining Value: $1.20/W $1.60/W
Contracted Levered NPV** $0.70/W $0.95/W
Renewal Levered NPV $0.41/W $0.52/W
Value of MW Deployed $3.87/W $3.32/W
CURRENT STRATEGY IS TO MAXIMIZE UPFRONT MONETIZATION EQUITY INVESTMENTS FROM 3RD PARTY FINANCIAL BUYERS ALSO POSSIBLE
$/W 30% ITC 10% ITC
Upfront Asset Financing:
Tax Equity Investment $1.77/W $0.48/W
Rebates & Prepayments $0.10/W $0.10/W
Equity Investment at 7% unlevered IRR* $1.46/W $2.05/W
Total Upfront Asset Financing $3.33/W $2.63/W
Remaining Value:
Renewal Value Yrs. 21-30 $0.41/W $0.52/W
Value of MW Deployed $3.74/W $3.15/W
*Illustrative example; equity investment in contracted cashflows at 8% unlevered IRR would yield $1.34/W and total asset monetization of $3.21
** Additional ability to monetize another $0.10 through securitization
5.5%
6.9% 7.4% 7.7% 8.9%
NEP Comparable
YieldCo Average
CAFD NYLD Unlevered Year
1 Yield of Contracted
Sale at 7% IRR*
DividendYields(2016
Consensus)
COMPARABLE YIELDCOS
24
NPV of Portfolio’s Levered Project Cash Flows of $1.7B*(excluding SRECs)
The NPV of Unlevered Project Cash Flows to SolarCity is $2.7 Billion; Project Non-Recourse Debt is $1.0 billion
Power Co Portfolio as of 9/30/15
Cumulative Deployments under an
Energy Contract
1.5 GW**
Annual Energy Harvest (2016) 1,400
Average Contract Price (2016) $0.126/kWh
Tax Equity % of net cashflow
(2016)
43%
Project Debt ($M) $995
Blended Cost of Debt (%) 4.5%
* Excludes SRECs
** Cumulative Deployments under an Energy Contract of 1.5GW excludes 0.1 GW of System Sales 25
-50.0
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
O&M Cash to Tax Equity Debt Service Levered Cashflows to SC
Cash flows generated by Energy Contracts
Strong Asset Quality with Predictable Performance
Underlying Asset is Contracted Cash Flow that Represents Customers’ Monthly Energy Bills
Low Delinquency Rates and the Predictability of Solar Irradiation Provide High Visibility into Cash Payment Stream
180+ Day Delinquency Rates are Low and Holding Steady kWh Production is Coming in Largely within Forecast
0.6%
0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
0.5%
0.6%
0.5% 0.5%
0.4% 0.4% 0.4%0.4%
0.5%
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
Oct
14
Nov
14
Dec
14
Jan
15
Feb
15
Mar
15
Apr
15
May
15
Jun
15
Jul
15
Aug
15
Sep
15
Oct
15
Delinquenciesas%ofBillings
 Average FICO score of residential portfolio was >750 as of 9/30/15
 Commercial customers largely consist of municipalities and investment grade corporations
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Sep
14
Oct
14
Nov
14
Dec
14
Jan
15
Feb
15
Mar
15
Apr
15
May
15
Jun
15
Jul
15
Aug
15
Energy(MWh)
Actual/Underwritten%
Actual Energy (MWh) Underwritten Estimate (MWh)
Actual/Underwritten %
26
B U S I N E S S K E Y D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S
L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y
V A L U E O F A S S E T S
M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S
V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S
P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S
O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E
I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y
G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
27
Strategy Targets Lower Cost, Longer Term Financing
Non-Recourse Term Financing
Solar Bonds
$334m Facility
at 3.25% + LIBOR
Corporate Revolver
Tax Equity
Non-Recourse
Aggregation Facilities
$650M Facility
at 2.75% + LIBOR
Long-Term Debt Securitization
at 4.3%-4.8% and Rated A and BBB+
0-1 Year 0-5 Year 8-13+ Years
Development and Construction
Financing (DevCo)
Asset Ownership (PowerCo)
28
$240M Facility
at 3.25% + LIBOR
$0.1 $0.3 $0.4 $0.4
$0.8
$1.7
$2.6
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q-Q3
NewCommittedProject
Financing($B)
Strong Track Record and Visibility into Financing
 Issued first asset-backed securitization (ABS) of distributed solar assets in
Q4 2013
 Four ABS transactions to date raised $450 million in non-recourse debt
collateralized by 317 MW of distributed solar
 Total Tax Equity Financing Raised: $4.4B
 Tax equity capacity: $929M
 Aggregation facility capacity: $398M
 MyPower conduit capacity: $77M (increased by $40M in Q4 2015)
 Revolver capacity: $19M (increased by $65M in Q4 2015)
 Cash and short-term investments: $439M
STRONG FINANCING TRACK RECORD $1.4B IN COMMITTED/UNDRAWN FUNDING AS OF 9/30/15
29
Debt Outstanding as of the End of Q3 2015
Terms
(Yrs.)
Underlying
MW
$M Outstanding
at End of 3Q15
Pre-Tax
Cost
Recourse
Payment
Schedule
Investment-Grade ABS Debt 8-13 317 $425M 4-5% Non-Rec. Amortizing
Aggregation/ MyPower
Facilities
2-3 764 $570M 3-4% Non-Rec. Amortizing
Revolver and Other* <1 $308M 3-4% Recourse Term
Solar Bonds 1-15 $211M 1-6% Recourse Term
Convertible Debt 5 $796M 2-3% Recourse Term
MW Inspected - No Back
Leverage
188
MW Inspected – Fully
monetized
225
PowerCo
Debt
DevCo
Debt
* Includes revolver debt of $295 and other debt of $13M
$123M LMC4
Issued at
4.4% WACC
and Rated A
Weighted-
Average 2.2%
interest rate
and 1.3 Yrs.
Remaining
Term
30
Short Term Maturities Extended to 2017
Revolving Debt Facility Maturity Extended and Capacity Increased
Revolving Aggregation Facilities Enable the Recycling of Assets and Are Expected to Be Upsized and Renewed
Outstanding
(9/30/15)
2016 2017
Revolver $295M
Prior Maturity:
Dec. 2016
New Maturity:
Dec. 2017
Solar Bonds $211M
$176M Due:
Sept. 2016
Expected to
Be Rolled Over
MyPower Facilities $123M Jan. 2017
Strategy to term out
in longer duration ABS
Aggregation Facilities $447M
Option for one yr. extension
on Dec. 2017 maturity
Strategy to term out
in longer duration ABS
31
B U S I N E S S K E Y D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S
L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y
V A L U E O F A S S E T S
M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S
V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S
P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S
O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E
I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y
G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
32
Installation Process for Customers Includes Six Steps
Sale Survey Design Permit Install PTO
Improving Customer Wait Times
34
MEDIAN DAYS FROM BOOKING TO INSTALL HAS FALLEN ~50% SINCE JANUARY 2013
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
Jan-13
Apr-13
Jul-13
Oct-13
Jan-14
Apr-14
Jul-14
Oct-14
Jan-15
Apr-15
Jul-15
Oct-15
MedianDaysfromBookingtoInstall
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Q32015Installations
Days from Booking to Install
Our Process Results in High Customer Satisfaction
60%
70%
80%
90%
NPSScore%
Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015
* Net promoter score is based on a scale of 1-10 in which the percentage of 0-6 scores is subtracted from 9-10 scores
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S
L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y
V A L U E O F A S S E T S
M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S
V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S
P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S
O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E
I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y
G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
50
Proprietary Origination at Scale
MW Booked Grew at a Compounded Annual Rate of 95% from Q3 2013 to Q3 2015
As We Continued to Drive Higher Growth, Sales Unit Costs Increased over the Last 2 Years from $0.40/W to $0.64/W
$0.40
$0.43
$0.51
$0.47 $0.49
$0.57 $0.59
$0.53
$0.64
$0.61 $0.59
3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15
SCTY
3Q15
Comp A
3Q15
Comp B
SalesCost($/W)
51
91
101
136
218
230
206
237
395
345
95
71
3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15
SCTY
3Q15
Comp A
3Q15
Comp B
MWBookedinPeriod
Lead generation Close
 Performance Marketing
 Retail partners
 Home Builder partners
 Malls
 Events
 Canvassing
 Ambassadors
 Referrals
• In-home consultation
• Phone consultation
• Online
MallCartTheHomeDepotDigitalAd
Diversified residential sales channels
52
Formulaic Growth in Commercial Sales
2013 2014 2015 YTD
CommercialMWBooked
CommercialSalesRepsbyCategory
Public Sector National Accounts Agriculture/Water
Mexico MW Booked
53
Reallocating Resources to Lower Cost Sales Channels
Sales Costs Vary Significantly by Channel
SolarCity Already has Channels Operating at Goal Cost Structures
Avg. $0.64
MW Installed by Channel
SalesCostbyChannel
($/W)
54
Note: We will not be disclosing this level of granularity on a regular basis
Achieving Our Sales Cost Goal of $0.40/W
Goal Is to Reallocate Resources and Drive Productivity to Improve Cost of Acquisition
$0.64
$0.40
$0.14
$0.10
$0.00
$0.10
$0.20
$0.30
$0.40
$0.50
$0.60
Sales Cost 3Q15 Channel Mix Effect Initiatives incl. Productivity
Improvement
Sales Cost Goal
SalesCost($/W)
55
B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S
L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y
V A L U E O F A S S E T S
M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S
V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S
P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S
O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E
I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y
G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
56
18
34
15 17 17 28
14 21
5362 70 67
90
120
148 139
168
203
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15
MWsInstalledinPeriod
Commercial Residential
Best-in-Class Operations Lead the Way in Volumes and Costs
MW Installed Have Grown 80% per Year since 2013 to Annualized Pace of >1 GW
Installation Cost/Watt of <$2.00/W is the Lowest Among Publicly-Reported Companies
57
* Installation cost is based on MW Deployed and tranched in period, which was a higher mix of lower cost residential installation in Q3 2015
$2.65 $2.49 $2.44
$2.28 $2.19 $2.09 $2.09 $2.13
$1.92
$2.27
$2.87
$1.00
$1.25
$1.50
$1.75
$2.00
$2.25
$2.50
$2.75
3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15
SCTY
3Q15
Comp. A
3Q15
Comp. B
InstallationCost($/W)
*
Safety and Quality Have Improved with Growth
58
TRAINING PROGRAM
 4 training academies
 All installers go through rigorous employment training
before setting foot on a job site
 Follow up with continued education online and in
person
 General leadership training at SolarCity headquarters
 Dedicated training team
SCTY vs. OSHA
Incidence Rates13
Recordable Rate Lost Days
SolarCity 1.8 0.3
Construction (All) 3.6 1.3
Specialty Trade 3.8 1.4
FEWER INCIDENTS AND LOST DAYS THAN COMPARABLE INDUSTRIES
2013-12 2014-03 2014-06 2014-09 2014-12 2015-03 2015-06 2015-09
FailureRate
CumulativeInstallations
Month of failure case creation
Jobs in Fleet Inverter Failure Rate Installer Error Rate
QUALITY: FAILURE RATES HOLDING STEADY WITH VOLUMES
For every 100 employees, SolarCity
experiences 1.8 recordable injuries/
illnesses (incl. non-serious) in a given
year (vs. 3.6 for the construction industry).
0.3 of these incidents have lead to missed
days (vs. 1.3 for construction).
SolarCity Product Quality
 SolarCity partners with select Tier-1 suppliers and requires them to meet our standards for product and
manufacturing excellence, with rigorous third party testing on an ongoing basis
 China-based SolarCity quality team (8 staff) and third party auditing firms visit supplier factories on regular
basis to ensure our products are built to specification
 SolarCity believes that the Useful Life of the Solar modules used in our installations exceeds 35 years.
59
Infrastructure in Place to Serve Key U.S. Solar Geographies
With 81 Operations Centers, We Are within 30 Minutes of 90% of the Population in Our Geographies14
Our Differentiated Logistics Network Enables Low Costs and Faster Customer Response Time
6 6
14 17
25
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15
Cumulative
New
Operations Centers
Opened Cumulative
60
Zep Offers Proprietary Means to Lower Unit Labor Costs
Zep Has Enabled Installation Crews to Double Productivity
InstallationHoursperkWInstalled
Zep Non-Zep*
* Small sample size
Single mounting system offers efficiencies in training, quality, safety, and maintenance
61
Certain Operations Centers and Commercial Projects Already
Performing Above Goals
Q32015InstallationCost($/W)
New Offices Mature Offices at
Operational Excellence
Offices Focused
On Being Optimized
Average
Q32015InstallationCost($//W)
Carports Ground-Mount and Rooftop
Average
Q3 2015 Commercial Installations81 Operations Centers
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
* Some Q3 2015 installation costs will flow through Q4 2015 cost per watt as MW are deployed and tranched
Note: We will not be disclosing this level of granularity on a regular basis
62
Reducing Installation Cost Goal to $1.50/W
Lower Hardware Prices and Soft Costs Are Each Expected to Drive ~50% of Cost Reductions
$1.02
$1.50
$0.90
$0.22
$0.10
$0.10
$0.00
$0.25
$0.50
$0.75
$1.00
$1.25
$1.50
$1.75
$2.00
Installation Cost 3Q15 Hardware Price
Reductions
Normalizing Higher
Cost Operations
Centers to Avg and
Lower Mix of Higher
Cost Carports*
Other Initiatives Installation Cost Goal
AverageTotalCostperWatt
$1.92
Soft Costs
Hardware
Costs
* Current economics in some states support carports but lower revenue numbers will reduce carport projects that generate enough returns
63
B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S
L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y
V A L U E O F A S S E T S
M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S
V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S
P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S
O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E
I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y
G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
64
Broad Technology Portfolio
SOLAR MODULES
 Silevo Tunneling Junction
 High efficiency / low cost
 World record module efficiency of
>22% certified by Renewable
Energy Test Center
 System design automation
 Energy production forecasting
 Logistics and resource management
 Utility rate tariff database
 Energy usage evaluations
 Customer account management
 Customer applications
SOFTWARE
 Fast installation, lower cycle time
 Superior aesthetics
MOUNTING HARDWARE &
BALANCE OF SYSTEM
 Real-time energy monitoring
 Voltage control
 Energy storage integration
GRID CONTROL SYSTEMS
65
Integrated Module Production Offers New Cost Advantage
Vertical Integration into Module Manufacturing to Provide Competitive Edge in Costs and Aesthetics
2017 Goal Is to Produce Modules at a Lower Cost of $0.55/W at a Higher Module Efficiency of 21-22%
Traditional Silicon Modules Silevo Module
Panel Wattage (60-cell) 260 350
Module Efficiency (Cell Efficiency) ~15% (~18%) 21-22% (24%)
Additional Energy Harvest -
>5%
Manufacturing cost goal ($/W) ~$0.55/W
Balance of system (BoS) cost reduction - >$0.10/W
Module Efficiency of >22%
Certified by Renewable Energy
Test Center
WORLD RECORD MODULE
 Silevo’s 350-Watt module is significantly above original 310-W at the time of acquisition due to breakthrough in
shingling technology
 Silevo cell is bi-facial, which allows for additional energy harvest in commercial and utility-scale installations
66
Higher Efficiency Enables Lower Labor and BoS Costs
Silevo’s 350-W Module Utilizes 33% Fewer Panels than Traditional Modules on a Typical House
Silevo installation
16 panels
× 350 Watts per panel =
6 kW System Size
Standard installation
24 panels
× 260 Watts per panel =
6 kW System Size
Additional mounting
planes required
 Enables fewer balance of system components and lower labor costs
 Increases available energy generation in roof-constrained environments
Higher Efficiency:
67
Largest Solar Panel Factory
in the Western Hemisphere
 Construction at Buffalo is underway with winter weather
incorporated into the schedule
 Targeting construction completion and initial equipment
installation by Q2 2016
 Silevo’s high-volume manufactured product has been
validated by Tier 1 financial solutions; installations underway
with manufacturing in China and our Fremont facility
 SolarCity will be operating the facility but does not own it,
which will be our strategic approach towards manufacturing
68
Zep Enables Better Aesthetics and More Panels on a Roof
Competitor with Traditional Mounting Hardware SolarCity with Zep
69
Note: Competitor image is rendered
Proprietary Residential Mounting Hardware Requires Fewer Steps
Our Zep Mounting Hardware Simplifies Installation and Eliminates the Need for Rails and Clips
Zep Enables Lower Installation Costs by Requiring Fewer Components and Less Labor Hours
CORE COMPONENTS
ToolsEnd CapArray SkirtGripDC Wire GripCombiner boxGround ZepInterlockLeveling Foot
70
Continued Investment in Productivity through Simplification
Current Part Count
New Part Count
71
Commercial Mounting Hardware Offers Unique Solution
CORE COMPONENTS
Positive AttachmentBallast Pan Zep Tool
DC Wire ClipSnap BushingPeak Base
Valley Base
Ground Zero
Bridge AssemblyConduit Assembly Tube Connector
ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS
72
Storage Enables Energy Independence
Market Segment Product
Commercial & Industrial DemandLogic reduces peak demand charges
Residential Cleaner, more affordable back-up power
Remote Communities
and the Developing
World
Microgrids protect against outages and provide
more affordable energy
Utilities
Capacity and power quality services
73
Storage Enables Solar Energy at Night
Building Firm, Dispatchable Power
74
Cleaner, More Affordable, More Resilient Grid
A Network of Distributed Solar and Storage Systems Enables a Lower Cost, More Reliable Grid
Distributed Energy Resource Aggregation Can Provide Low-Cost Grid Services such as Peak Shaving and Voltage Support
75
B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S
L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y
V A L U E O F A S S E T S
M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S
V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S
P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S
O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E
I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y
G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
76
Conclusion
 Originating new solar installations at an annualized rate of >1 GW
 New Energy Contracts generating value of ~$3.86 per Watt today with a 30% ITC (and an
estimated $3.32 per Watt with a 10% ITC)
 Building solar assets at the best cost of publicly-traded peers of ~$2.84/W with a path to $2.25/W
in 2017 and ultimately $2.00/W
 Deployed and retained portfolio of 1.5 GW generating $135M in annual unlevered and $55M
in annual levered cash flow on average over the next five years and a total 30-Yr. NPV of
$1.7 billion (excluding SRECs)
 Currently monetizing upfront ~2/3 of the value generated, and exploring options to monetize more
of the cash flow in year one
 Investing in technology to widen our relative cost advantage and enable greater renewable
capacity on existing grid infrastructure
- Goal of not owning manufacturing assets on balance sheet
77
83
136
285
503
878-
898 1,250
0
250
500
750
1,000
1,250
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E* 2016E*
MWsInstalledinPeriod
Guidance Implies MW Installed Growth of 43% in 2016 vs. 2015
* Based on Q4 2015 guidance of 280-300 MW Installed
78
Long-Term Guidance
79
Metric Unit 2014 2015 2017 2019
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
U.S. Power Capacity:
U.S. Installed Generating Capacity GW-AC 1,161 1,169 1,172 1,177 1,182 1,171 1,176
Distributed Solar as % of U.S. Generating Capacity % 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% Continued increase in
U.S. Installed Distributed Solar Capacity GW-DC 6.7 7.3 7.9 8.6 9.2 10.0 10.8 Distributed solar generation penetration
New U.S. Installed Distributed Solar Capacity MW-DC 483 564 559 719 682 697 796
SCTY Units:
SCTY % of New U.S. Distributed Solar Capacity % 17% 19% 25% 25% 22% 27% 32%
MW Installed MW 82 107 138 177 153 189 256 One Million Customer Goal
MW Deployed MW 82 107 137 176 143 177 205
MW PTO'd MW 83 79 113 138 160 156 203
Energy Contract Pricing of New Deployments (Yr. 1) $/kWh $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 Increase in Pricing
Annual Escalator % 1.7% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2%
SREC (5-Yr. Portfolio Average) $/kWh $0.01 $0.01 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02
Energy Harvest (Yr. 1) kWh/kW 1,425 1,416 1,406 1,402 1,404 1,379 1,352
Value Generation and Monetization:
Asset Financing in Period (including rebates)* $/W $2.69 $2.04 $2.62 $2.28 $2.35 $2.33 $3.20 Seeking to monetize a higher % of value upfront
Contracted Value of MW Deployed in Period † $/W $3.68 $3.55 $3.37 $3.24 $3.44 $3.49 $3.50
Renewal Value of MW Deployed in Period † $/W $0.38 $0.40 $0.38 $0.34 $0.33 $0.34 $0.36
Total Value of MW Deployed in Period $/W $4.06 $3.95 $3.74 $3.58 $3.77 $3.83 $3.86
Cost per Watt**:
Sales $/W $0.51 $0.47 $0.49 $0.57 $0.59 $0.53 $0.64
Installation $/W $2.44 $2.28 $2.19 $2.09 $2.09 $2.13 $1.92
G&A $/W $0.30 $0.26 $0.21 $0.20 $0.27 $0.24 $0.27
Total Cost per Watt $/W $3.25 $3.01 $2.89 $2.86 $2.95 $2.91 $2.84 $2.25 $2.00
R&D Expenses $M ($1.9) ($3.0) ($4.2) ($10.0) ($12.1) ($12.4) ($17.7)
Capital Expenditures $M ($4.7) ($2.9) ($5.8) ($9.5) ($30.5) ($71.6) ($45.7)
Change in Working Capital Q/Q $M $28.3 $22.7 $37.0 ($38.1) ($72.3) ($31.7) ($41.7)
Debt and Cash:
Debt - Recourse $M ($176.6) ($349.8) ($165.2) ($149.7) ($290.6) ($419.2) ($518.2)
Debt - Convertible $M ($230.0) ($230.0) ($730.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) ($796.0)
Cash & Short-Term Investments $M $526.2 $429.6 $756.8 $663.6 $586.2 $497.6 $438.7
Value creation
Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV Remaining of Cumulative MW Deployed (1.5) $M $2,708
Debt – Non-Recourse $M ($995)
Net NPV of Cumulative MW Deployed
$M $1,713
* Weighted average of Q1-Q3 2015 Asset Financing is $2.68
** Cost per Watt is based on our quarterly cost calculation methodology we detail on our website
† Updated since original report
Questions & Answers
80
Appendix A: MyPower Gross Project Cash Flows
81
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Energy Production kWh/kW 1,488 1,480 1,473 1,466 1,458 1,451 1,444 1,437 1,429 1,422 1,415 1,408 1,401 1,394 1,387 1,380 1,373 1,366 1,359 1,353
Annual Degradation (0.5%)
Contract (+PBI) Price $/kWh 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.27
Annual Escalator 2.6%
SREC $/kWh $0.04 $0.03 $0.03 $0.02 $0.01
Rebates/Prepayments $/W $0.04
Project Revenue $/W 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.36
O&M Expenses $/W -0.02 -0.02 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.18 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03
Gross Project Cash Flow $/W 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.33
Year 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Energy Production 1,346 1,339 1,332 1,326 1,319 1,313 1,306 1,299 1,293 1,287
Annual Degradation
Contract (+PBI) Price 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35
Annual Escalator
SREC
Project Revenue 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45
O&M Expenses -0.15 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04
Gross Project Cash Flow 0.22 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.40
$/W UNIT ECONOMICS FOR THE 26 MW OF MYPOWER DEPLOYED IN Q3 2015:
30-Year NPV: $3.77/W
 Rebates/Prepayments: $0.04/W (upfront)
 Contracted NPV: $3.73/W (discounted at 6%)
 Renewal NPV: $0.00/W (discounted at 6%)
• Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W
Note: Excludes default rates
†Updated since original report
1 FERC “Energy Infrastructure Updates” from December 2011 to December 2014 (http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports.asp)
2 GTM Research/SEIA’s “U.S Solar Market Insight Report Q2 2015” for residential and solar solar capacity and FERC “Energy Infrastructure Updates” ((http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports.asp) for all other energy capacity
3 GTM Research/SEIA’s “U.S Solar Market Insight Report Q2 2015”
4 EIA’s “2014 Utility Bundled Retail Sales” (https://www.eia.gov/electricity/sales_revenue_price/pdf/table10.pdf)
5 EIA’s “Average Price by State by Provider, 1990-2014” (http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/state)
6 Based on filings from PG&E (http://www.pge.com/nots/rates/tariffs/tm2/pdf/ELEC_4697-E.pdf), Southern California Edison (https://www.sce.com/NR/sc3/tm2/pdf/3268-E.pdf), and SDG&E (http://regarchive.sdge.com/tm2/pdf/2784-E.pdf)
and assumes an additional 3% annual rate increases per year
7 GTM Research/SEIA’s “U.S Solar Market Insight Report Q2 2015”
8 Single-family housing units based on data from U.S. Census American Community Survey’s “Housing Units by Units in Structure and State” and assumes 1.0% annual growth in the housing stock per year through 2015. Excludes multi-
family, mobile, and other housing units
9 U.S. Census Bureau’s “Building Permits Survey by State – Annual” (http://www.census.gov/construction/bps)
10 Commercial buildings count from EIA’s 2012 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption and commercial solar installations from GTM Research/SEIA’s “U.S. Solar Market Insight Report”
11 GTM Research – U.S. PV Leaderboard
12 Solar insolation hours based on NREL PV Watts calculator and representative cities in each country. Pricing is derived from a range of sources, including Eurostat, Climatescope, GTM Latin America Playbook, and CFE
13 Bureau of Labor Statistics Incidence rates of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by case type and ownership, selected industries, 2014 (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh_10292015.htm)
14 U.S. Census Bureau 2010. Based on the percent of the population, in states where SCTY operates, that reside in zip codes serviceable by SolarCity. Excludes NY, TX, PA and Mexico
Appendix B: Footnotes - (1/1)
82
“Asset Financing in Period” represents the aggregate project financing cash receipts in a period. This includes both tax equity investment as well as non-recourse project debt, such as our aggregation and MyPower facilities and solar
asset-backed loans. Asset monetization per watt is a ratio of total Asset Monetization in the Period divided by MW Deployed in the period, and reflects only actual cash received in a period whether or not they are specifically related to the
actual MW Deployed in the period.
“Customers” includes all residential, commercial and government buildings where we have installed or contracted to install a solar energy system, or performed or contracted to perform an energy efficiency evaluation or other energy
efficiency services.
“Energy Contracts” includes all residential, commercial and government leases and power purchase agreements and consumer loan agreements pursuant to which consumers use or will use energy generated by a solar energy system that
we have installed or contracted to install. For landlord-tenant structures in which we contract with the landlord or development company, we include each residence as an individual contract. For commercial customers with multiple locations,
each location is deemed a contract if we maintain a separate contract for that location.
“Gross Project Cash Flow” forecast represent our estimate of the sum of total cash inflows we forecast from MW Deployed in the applicable period under Energy Contracts over the 30 year expected life of the system. This includes (a)
payments that our customers are obligated to pay us over the remaining term of such contracts, (b) associated performance-based incentive (PBI) payments, (c) associated solar renewable energy credits (SRECs) that we have contracted to
sell, typically representing 5 years of a total potential term of 15 years, and are net of (d) estimated operations and maintenance, insurance, administrative and inverter replacement costs, based on contractually agreed amounts as well as
historic and forecasted expenses. Operations and maintenance, insurance, and administrative costs reflect our operating expenses in our funds, or are estimated at $0.021 per watt and assumed to grow at a 2.5% inflation rate per year, and
inverter replacement unit costs are estimated to decline at a (2.5%) rate per year, implying $0.15 per watt in Year 11 and $0.12 per watt in Year 21. Energy production is estimated to degrade at 0.5% per year. For our MyPower Energy
Contracts, we use the expected cash flows over the full term of the 30-year contract, and for lease and PPA Energy Contracts with terms less than 30 years, we assume the contracts are renewed at a contract price equal to 90% of the
contractual price in effect at expiration of the initial term through the remainder of the expected 30-year system life.
“MW” or “megawatts” represents the DC nameplate megawatt production capacity.
“MW Booked” represents the aggregate megawatt production capacity of solar energy systems pursuant to customer contracts signed (with no contingencies remaining) during the applicable period net of cancellations during the applicable
period. This metric includes solar energy systems booked under Energy Contracts as well as for solar energy system direct sales.
“MW Deployed” represents the megawatt production capacity of solar energy systems that have had all required building department inspections completed during the applicable period. This metric includes solar energy systems deployed
under Energy Contracts as well as for solar energy system direct sales.
Appendix C – Definitions (1/2)
83
“MW Installed” represents the megawatt production capacity of solar energy systems, for which (i) all solar panels, inverters, mounting and racking hardware, and system wiring have been installed, (ii) the system inverter is connected and a
successful DC string test has been completed confirming the production capacity of the system, and (iii) the system is capable of being grid connected (including pending a utility disconnect procedure), the latest of which is completed during
the applicable period. This metric includes solar energy systems deployed under Energy Contracts as well as for solar energy system direct sales. In each case in-period completion of the above criteria may be demonstrated by written
verification by each of the Chief Financial Officer and the President (which may include written sub-certifications).
“MW PTO’d” represents the megawatt production capacity of solar energy systems that have had all required building department inspections completed by the authority having jurisdiction and subsequently interconnected to the utility grid.
“Pre-Tax NPV” represents the net present value at a 6% discount rate of the Levered Project Cash forecast. It includes both the debt proceeds and total debt service including full principal repayment for both (a) actual Aggregation Facility
debt drawn down (or expected to be drawn down) and (b) our forecast for Solar Asset-Backed Loans for the underlying MW Deployed in the period. This includes both “Contracted Levered NPV,” which represents the net present value of
Levered Project Cash Flow under contract as well as “Renewal Levered NPV,” which represents the net present value of Levered Project Cash Flow forecast from renewal.
“Unlevered Project Cash Flow” represents our forecast of Gross Project Cash Flows after both Tax Equity Investment and Tax Equity Lease/PPA Distributions. “Tax equity Investment” represents the total expected investment from our tax
equity funds investors in our lease and PPA Energy Contracts. “Tax Equity Lease/PPA Distributions” are based on the terms of the agreements we have in place with our tax equity investment partners for the MW Deployed in the applicable
period under lease and PPA Energy Contracts. We do not use tax equity investment for our MyPower product. For tax equity investment in our lease and PPA Energy Contracts, our investment partners share in a portion of the Gross Project
Cash Flow forecast received over the term of the agreement. Our estimate is not inclusive of any potential buy-out of our tax equity partners’ interests in the project after Year 20.
“Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV” represents the net present value at a 6% discount rate of the Unlevered Project Cash forecast. It includes (a) the Tax Equity Investment as well as the Gross Project Cash Flows after Tax Equity Lease/PPA
Distributions. This includes both “Contracted Unlevered NPV,” which represents the net present value of Unlevered Project Cash Flow under contract as well as “Renewal Unlevered NPV,” which represents the net present value of Unlevered
Project Cash Flow forecast from renewal of our lease/PPA contracts.
“Value of MW Deployed” represents the Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV of MW Deployed under an Energy Contract during a specified period.
“Levered Project Cash Flow” represents our forecast of Unlevered Project Cash Flows after non-recourse debt service. Debt service includes both (a) Aggregation Facility debt for the first two years, based on the terms of our current
facility, as well as (b) Solar Asset-Backed Loans, which we assume we issue at the end of year two to refinance the Aggregation Facility debt. We base the interest rate on the average of all four of our previous issuances and assume
principal repayment over an 18-year term.
Appendix C – Definitions (2/2)
84
Thank you

More Related Content

What's hot

Winning Renewable Energy Investment Strategies for Fortune 1000 Firms
Winning Renewable Energy Investment Strategies for Fortune 1000 FirmsWinning Renewable Energy Investment Strategies for Fortune 1000 Firms
Winning Renewable Energy Investment Strategies for Fortune 1000 FirmsICF
 
The case for net metering in Country 'X'
The case for net metering in Country 'X'The case for net metering in Country 'X'
The case for net metering in Country 'X'Joseph Saviour
 
Aspen Forum 2017 - Jan Vrins - Building Value in the Energy Cloud
Aspen Forum 2017 - Jan Vrins - Building Value in the Energy CloudAspen Forum 2017 - Jan Vrins - Building Value in the Energy Cloud
Aspen Forum 2017 - Jan Vrins - Building Value in the Energy CloudGuidehouse
 
Edison International Business Update July 2019
Edison International Business Update July 2019Edison International Business Update July 2019
Edison International Business Update July 2019EdisonInternational
 
20151022 SEPA Deora Slides for Deloitte Solar Growth Dbrief
20151022 SEPA Deora Slides for Deloitte Solar Growth Dbrief20151022 SEPA Deora Slides for Deloitte Solar Growth Dbrief
20151022 SEPA Deora Slides for Deloitte Solar Growth DbriefTanuj Deora
 
Edison International October 2020 Business Update
Edison International October 2020 Business UpdateEdison International October 2020 Business Update
Edison International October 2020 Business UpdateEdisonInternational
 
Multi-method decision modeling of distributed energy resource impacts on elec...
Multi-method decision modeling of distributed energy resource impacts on elec...Multi-method decision modeling of distributed energy resource impacts on elec...
Multi-method decision modeling of distributed energy resource impacts on elec...Cory Welch
 
Capgemini Report - Energy Transformations
Capgemini Report - Energy TransformationsCapgemini Report - Energy Transformations
Capgemini Report - Energy TransformationsRoger Atkins
 
Edison International October 2019 Business Update
Edison International October 2019 Business UpdateEdison International October 2019 Business Update
Edison International October 2019 Business UpdateEdisonInternational
 
Day-3, Ms. Shruti Bhatia
Day-3, Ms. Shruti BhatiaDay-3, Ms. Shruti Bhatia
Day-3, Ms. Shruti BhatiaIPPAI
 
Edison International May 2019 Business Update.
Edison International May 2019 Business Update.Edison International May 2019 Business Update.
Edison International May 2019 Business Update.EdisonInternational
 
20161006 Szaro Power Matters Conference all slides
20161006 Szaro Power Matters Conference all slides20161006 Szaro Power Matters Conference all slides
20161006 Szaro Power Matters Conference all slidesJennifer Szaro
 
Edison International February 2020 Business Update
Edison International February 2020 Business UpdateEdison International February 2020 Business Update
Edison International February 2020 Business UpdateEdisonInternational
 
Edison International May 2020 Business Update
Edison International May 2020 Business UpdateEdison International May 2020 Business Update
Edison International May 2020 Business UpdateEdisonInternational
 
Navigating the Energy Transformation: Creating Customer and Shareholder Value...
Navigating the Energy Transformation: Creating Customer and Shareholder Value...Navigating the Energy Transformation: Creating Customer and Shareholder Value...
Navigating the Energy Transformation: Creating Customer and Shareholder Value...Guidehouse
 
John Lushetsky | The DOE Solar Program
John Lushetsky | The DOE Solar ProgramJohn Lushetsky | The DOE Solar Program
John Lushetsky | The DOE Solar ProgramGW Solar Institute
 
public serviceenterprise group12/12/07
public serviceenterprise group12/12/07public serviceenterprise group12/12/07
public serviceenterprise group12/12/07finance20
 
Edison International Business Update - July 2018
Edison International Business Update - July 2018Edison International Business Update - July 2018
Edison International Business Update - July 2018EdisonInternational
 
Day2: Mr. Pr ray
Day2: Mr. Pr rayDay2: Mr. Pr ray
Day2: Mr. Pr rayIPPAI
 

What's hot (20)

Winning Renewable Energy Investment Strategies for Fortune 1000 Firms
Winning Renewable Energy Investment Strategies for Fortune 1000 FirmsWinning Renewable Energy Investment Strategies for Fortune 1000 Firms
Winning Renewable Energy Investment Strategies for Fortune 1000 Firms
 
The case for net metering in Country 'X'
The case for net metering in Country 'X'The case for net metering in Country 'X'
The case for net metering in Country 'X'
 
Aspen Forum 2017 - Jan Vrins - Building Value in the Energy Cloud
Aspen Forum 2017 - Jan Vrins - Building Value in the Energy CloudAspen Forum 2017 - Jan Vrins - Building Value in the Energy Cloud
Aspen Forum 2017 - Jan Vrins - Building Value in the Energy Cloud
 
Edison International Business Update July 2019
Edison International Business Update July 2019Edison International Business Update July 2019
Edison International Business Update July 2019
 
20151022 SEPA Deora Slides for Deloitte Solar Growth Dbrief
20151022 SEPA Deora Slides for Deloitte Solar Growth Dbrief20151022 SEPA Deora Slides for Deloitte Solar Growth Dbrief
20151022 SEPA Deora Slides for Deloitte Solar Growth Dbrief
 
Edison International October 2020 Business Update
Edison International October 2020 Business UpdateEdison International October 2020 Business Update
Edison International October 2020 Business Update
 
Multi-method decision modeling of distributed energy resource impacts on elec...
Multi-method decision modeling of distributed energy resource impacts on elec...Multi-method decision modeling of distributed energy resource impacts on elec...
Multi-method decision modeling of distributed energy resource impacts on elec...
 
Capgemini Report - Energy Transformations
Capgemini Report - Energy TransformationsCapgemini Report - Energy Transformations
Capgemini Report - Energy Transformations
 
Edison International October 2019 Business Update
Edison International October 2019 Business UpdateEdison International October 2019 Business Update
Edison International October 2019 Business Update
 
Day-3, Ms. Shruti Bhatia
Day-3, Ms. Shruti BhatiaDay-3, Ms. Shruti Bhatia
Day-3, Ms. Shruti Bhatia
 
Edison International May 2019 Business Update.
Edison International May 2019 Business Update.Edison International May 2019 Business Update.
Edison International May 2019 Business Update.
 
20161006 Szaro Power Matters Conference all slides
20161006 Szaro Power Matters Conference all slides20161006 Szaro Power Matters Conference all slides
20161006 Szaro Power Matters Conference all slides
 
Edison International February 2020 Business Update
Edison International February 2020 Business UpdateEdison International February 2020 Business Update
Edison International February 2020 Business Update
 
Smart Metering POV
Smart Metering POVSmart Metering POV
Smart Metering POV
 
Edison International May 2020 Business Update
Edison International May 2020 Business UpdateEdison International May 2020 Business Update
Edison International May 2020 Business Update
 
Navigating the Energy Transformation: Creating Customer and Shareholder Value...
Navigating the Energy Transformation: Creating Customer and Shareholder Value...Navigating the Energy Transformation: Creating Customer and Shareholder Value...
Navigating the Energy Transformation: Creating Customer and Shareholder Value...
 
John Lushetsky | The DOE Solar Program
John Lushetsky | The DOE Solar ProgramJohn Lushetsky | The DOE Solar Program
John Lushetsky | The DOE Solar Program
 
public serviceenterprise group12/12/07
public serviceenterprise group12/12/07public serviceenterprise group12/12/07
public serviceenterprise group12/12/07
 
Edison International Business Update - July 2018
Edison International Business Update - July 2018Edison International Business Update - July 2018
Edison International Business Update - July 2018
 
Day2: Mr. Pr ray
Day2: Mr. Pr rayDay2: Mr. Pr ray
Day2: Mr. Pr ray
 

Viewers also liked

SolarCity Investors _ Nov 2015
SolarCity  Investors _ Nov 2015SolarCity  Investors _ Nov 2015
SolarCity Investors _ Nov 2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Investor Information
Investor InformationInvestor Information
Investor Informationjoefleming
 
Les Barbares Attaquent l'Énergie ! Par Oussama Ammar
Les Barbares Attaquent l'Énergie ! Par Oussama AmmarLes Barbares Attaquent l'Énergie ! Par Oussama Ammar
Les Barbares Attaquent l'Énergie ! Par Oussama AmmarTheFamily
 
Tesla Motors Inc. Strategic analysis 2016
Tesla Motors Inc. Strategic analysis 2016Tesla Motors Inc. Strategic analysis 2016
Tesla Motors Inc. Strategic analysis 2016Nicolas AUCONIE
 
Christoph Forstner: Market Entry Concept of Solarcity
Christoph Forstner: Market Entry Concept of Solarcity Christoph Forstner: Market Entry Concept of Solarcity
Christoph Forstner: Market Entry Concept of Solarcity Christoph Forstner
 

Viewers also liked (7)

SolarCity Investors _ Nov 2015
SolarCity  Investors _ Nov 2015SolarCity  Investors _ Nov 2015
SolarCity Investors _ Nov 2015
 
Investor Information
Investor InformationInvestor Information
Investor Information
 
Les Barbares Attaquent l'Énergie ! Par Oussama Ammar
Les Barbares Attaquent l'Énergie ! Par Oussama AmmarLes Barbares Attaquent l'Énergie ! Par Oussama Ammar
Les Barbares Attaquent l'Énergie ! Par Oussama Ammar
 
SolarCity
SolarCitySolarCity
SolarCity
 
Tesla Motors Inc. Strategic analysis 2016
Tesla Motors Inc. Strategic analysis 2016Tesla Motors Inc. Strategic analysis 2016
Tesla Motors Inc. Strategic analysis 2016
 
Christoph Forstner: Market Entry Concept of Solarcity
Christoph Forstner: Market Entry Concept of Solarcity Christoph Forstner: Market Entry Concept of Solarcity
Christoph Forstner: Market Entry Concept of Solarcity
 
Home Solar, Simplified
Home Solar, SimplifiedHome Solar, Simplified
Home Solar, Simplified
 

Similar to SolarCity Analysts Day_2015

Dec 2014 investor deck
Dec 2014 investor deckDec 2014 investor deck
Dec 2014 investor deckbroadwind
 
Evercore ISI Utility CEO Retreat
 Evercore ISI Utility CEO Retreat Evercore ISI Utility CEO Retreat
Evercore ISI Utility CEO Retreatpinnaclewestcapital
 
Chesapeake Presentation at 2016 Heikkinen Energy Conference
Chesapeake Presentation at 2016 Heikkinen Energy ConferenceChesapeake Presentation at 2016 Heikkinen Energy Conference
Chesapeake Presentation at 2016 Heikkinen Energy ConferenceMarcellus Drilling News
 
progress energy q1 2008
progress energy q1 2008progress energy q1 2008
progress energy q1 2008finance25
 
Edison International Business Update - July 2017
Edison International Business Update - July 2017Edison International Business Update - July 2017
Edison International Business Update - July 2017EdisonInternational
 
Edison International - Business Update November 2016
Edison International - Business Update November 2016Edison International - Business Update November 2016
Edison International - Business Update November 2016EdisonInternational
 
May 2013 investor presentation final
May 2013 investor presentation finalMay 2013 investor presentation final
May 2013 investor presentation finalt_renew
 
2022-ExxonMobil-Investor-Day.pdf
2022-ExxonMobil-Investor-Day.pdf2022-ExxonMobil-Investor-Day.pdf
2022-ExxonMobil-Investor-Day.pdfssuser204d51
 
Nov x21 corporate_presentation_jan2014
Nov x21 corporate_presentation_jan2014Nov x21 corporate_presentation_jan2014
Nov x21 corporate_presentation_jan2014NovX21
 
Q4 2013 jnpr financial results slides 1 23 14
Q4 2013 jnpr financial results slides   1 23 14Q4 2013 jnpr financial results slides   1 23 14
Q4 2013 jnpr financial results slides 1 23 14IRJuniperNetworks
 
Edison International Business Update June 2017
Edison International Business Update June 2017Edison International Business Update June 2017
Edison International Business Update June 2017EdisonInternational
 
Lm010815 investor-presentation-gs
Lm010815 investor-presentation-gsLm010815 investor-presentation-gs
Lm010815 investor-presentation-gsSandRidgeEnergyInc
 
Edison International October 2017 Business Update
Edison International October 2017 Business UpdateEdison International October 2017 Business Update
Edison International October 2017 Business UpdateEdisonInternational
 
Investor conferences-boston-and-new-york-march-4-and-5-2015
Investor conferences-boston-and-new-york-march-4-and-5-2015Investor conferences-boston-and-new-york-march-4-and-5-2015
Investor conferences-boston-and-new-york-march-4-and-5-2015pinnaclewestcapital
 
Jp morgan okc bus tour may 16 16 - final
Jp morgan okc bus tour   may 16 16 - finalJp morgan okc bus tour   may 16 16 - final
Jp morgan okc bus tour may 16 16 - finalEnLinkMidstreamLLC
 
Q2 2016 Financial Report Conference Call Presentation
Q2 2016 Financial Report Conference Call PresentationQ2 2016 Financial Report Conference Call Presentation
Q2 2016 Financial Report Conference Call PresentationTeckResourcesLtd
 
consoliddated edison 2005_SCE_annua
consoliddated edison 2005_SCE_annua consoliddated edison 2005_SCE_annua
consoliddated edison 2005_SCE_annua finance20
 
edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189
edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189
edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189finance21
 

Similar to SolarCity Analysts Day_2015 (20)

Dec 2014 investor deck
Dec 2014 investor deckDec 2014 investor deck
Dec 2014 investor deck
 
Evercore ISI Utility CEO Retreat
 Evercore ISI Utility CEO Retreat Evercore ISI Utility CEO Retreat
Evercore ISI Utility CEO Retreat
 
Chesapeake Presentation at 2016 Heikkinen Energy Conference
Chesapeake Presentation at 2016 Heikkinen Energy ConferenceChesapeake Presentation at 2016 Heikkinen Energy Conference
Chesapeake Presentation at 2016 Heikkinen Energy Conference
 
progress energy q1 2008
progress energy q1 2008progress energy q1 2008
progress energy q1 2008
 
Edison International Business Update - July 2017
Edison International Business Update - July 2017Edison International Business Update - July 2017
Edison International Business Update - July 2017
 
Edison International - Business Update November 2016
Edison International - Business Update November 2016Edison International - Business Update November 2016
Edison International - Business Update November 2016
 
May 2013 investor presentation final
May 2013 investor presentation finalMay 2013 investor presentation final
May 2013 investor presentation final
 
2022-ExxonMobil-Investor-Day.pdf
2022-ExxonMobil-Investor-Day.pdf2022-ExxonMobil-Investor-Day.pdf
2022-ExxonMobil-Investor-Day.pdf
 
Nov x21 corporate_presentation_jan2014
Nov x21 corporate_presentation_jan2014Nov x21 corporate_presentation_jan2014
Nov x21 corporate_presentation_jan2014
 
Q4 2013 jnpr financial results slides 1 23 14
Q4 2013 jnpr financial results slides   1 23 14Q4 2013 jnpr financial results slides   1 23 14
Q4 2013 jnpr financial results slides 1 23 14
 
2Q 2019 Earnings
2Q 2019 Earnings2Q 2019 Earnings
2Q 2019 Earnings
 
Edison International Business Update June 2017
Edison International Business Update June 2017Edison International Business Update June 2017
Edison International Business Update June 2017
 
170218
170218170218
170218
 
Lm010815 investor-presentation-gs
Lm010815 investor-presentation-gsLm010815 investor-presentation-gs
Lm010815 investor-presentation-gs
 
Edison International October 2017 Business Update
Edison International October 2017 Business UpdateEdison International October 2017 Business Update
Edison International October 2017 Business Update
 
Investor conferences-boston-and-new-york-march-4-and-5-2015
Investor conferences-boston-and-new-york-march-4-and-5-2015Investor conferences-boston-and-new-york-march-4-and-5-2015
Investor conferences-boston-and-new-york-march-4-and-5-2015
 
Jp morgan okc bus tour may 16 16 - final
Jp morgan okc bus tour   may 16 16 - finalJp morgan okc bus tour   may 16 16 - final
Jp morgan okc bus tour may 16 16 - final
 
Q2 2016 Financial Report Conference Call Presentation
Q2 2016 Financial Report Conference Call PresentationQ2 2016 Financial Report Conference Call Presentation
Q2 2016 Financial Report Conference Call Presentation
 
consoliddated edison 2005_SCE_annua
consoliddated edison 2005_SCE_annua consoliddated edison 2005_SCE_annua
consoliddated edison 2005_SCE_annua
 
edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189
edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189
edison international 2005_SCE_annual_7189
 

More from Dmitry Tseitlin

Ton Tlegram Open Network
Ton Tlegram Open NetworkTon Tlegram Open Network
Ton Tlegram Open NetworkDmitry Tseitlin
 
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016 State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016 Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Clarity from above PWC 2016
Clarity from above PWC 2016Clarity from above PWC 2016
Clarity from above PWC 2016Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...Dmitry Tseitlin
 
ESA - 2013 space transportation
ESA - 2013 space transportation ESA - 2013 space transportation
ESA - 2013 space transportation Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Результаты РФФИ 2015
Результаты РФФИ 2015 Результаты РФФИ 2015
Результаты РФФИ 2015 Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016Dmitry Tseitlin
 
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 BerkeleyHigh technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 BerkeleyDmitry Tseitlin
 
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -Dmitry Tseitlin
 
NASA_CCO_status-2013 update
NASA_CCO_status-2013 updateNASA_CCO_status-2013 update
NASA_CCO_status-2013 updateDmitry Tseitlin
 

More from Dmitry Tseitlin (20)

Ton Tlegram Open Network
Ton Tlegram Open NetworkTon Tlegram Open Network
Ton Tlegram Open Network
 
Marinet en 2017
Marinet en 2017Marinet en 2017
Marinet en 2017
 
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016 State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
 
Clarity from above PWC 2016
Clarity from above PWC 2016Clarity from above PWC 2016
Clarity from above PWC 2016
 
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
 
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
 
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
 
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
 
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
 
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
 
ESA - 2013 space transportation
ESA - 2013 space transportation ESA - 2013 space transportation
ESA - 2013 space transportation
 
Результаты РФФИ 2015
Результаты РФФИ 2015 Результаты РФФИ 2015
Результаты РФФИ 2015
 
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
 
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
 
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
 
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
 
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
 
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 BerkeleyHigh technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
 
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
 
NASA_CCO_status-2013 update
NASA_CCO_status-2013 updateNASA_CCO_status-2013 update
NASA_CCO_status-2013 update
 

Recently uploaded

Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationRidwan Fadjar
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...shyamraj55
 
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsVertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsMiki Katsuragi
 
costume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentationcostume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentationphoebematthew05
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationSlibray Presentation
 
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDGAPIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDGMarianaLemus7
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxhariprasad279825
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machinePadma Pradeep
 
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsAI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsMemoori
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupFlorian Wilhelm
 
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level pieceStory boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piececharlottematthew16
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Mark Simos
 
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time ClashPowerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clashcharlottematthew16
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Wonjun Hwang
 
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLScyllaDB
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek SchlawackFwdays
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
 
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsVertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
 
costume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentationcostume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentation
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
 
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDGAPIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDG
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
 
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsAI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
 
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level pieceStory boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
 
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time ClashPowerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
 
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
 

SolarCity Analysts Day_2015

  • 1. 2 0 1 5 A N A L Y S T D A Y Delivering Better Energy
  • 2. This presentation contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding SolarCity’s business strategies; our operational growth and expansion opportunities; our international expansion plans, including our expectations as to lower global module pricing and labor costs outside the United States; the deployment and installation of megawatts, including estimated Q4 2015 and 2016 megawatt installations; future bookings; financial strategies for cash generation and increasing shareholder value; forecasted cash flows from existing Energy Contracts, including related assumptions as to energy production future operations and maintenance expenses, cancellation rates, renewal rates, default rates, amounts of performance based incentives and other identified assumptions; our projections related to decreases in cost per Watt, including our plans to decrease our sales cost per Watt by eliminating higher cost channels, utilizing more efficient channels, and other initiatives, the impact of proprietary technology in decreasing our installation costs, our expectations regarding future hardware pricing, our expectations regarding the maturing efficiency of our operations centers, and our plans to vertically integrate our commercial product offerings along with related projections regarding installation efficiencies and cost savings; our plans to achieve manufacturing economies of scale and associated manufacturing cost reductions; our expectations regarding the Riverbend agreement and the development and construction of the Riverbend facility, including our projection that the facility will be completed and ready to commence operations by Q2 2016, our expectations regarding capital and operating expenses and the performance of our manufacturing operations; our expectations as to future regulatory and policy outcomes affecting our industry, including our belief as to the likelihood of an extension of the Federal Investment Tax Credit and the continued adoption and extension of net-energy metering programs; our projections regarding hypothetical cash flows and tax equity transactions following the schedule step-down in the Federal Investment Tax Credit; our projections regarding the future pricing of utility-generated electricity and customer savings; our liquidity and forecasted access to capital, including assumptions related to the terms of future financing (including risk premiums and interest rates), the sufficiency of committed available financing, the terms and frequency of future securities offerings (including securitization offerings and our expectation that the risk premium of future securitized offerings will decrease consistent with that of mortgages) and our expectations regarding the refinancing of existing debt obligations, including our short-term Solar Bonds; the amount of megawatts that can be installed and deployed based on committed available financing; the success of our product development efforts and customer preferences, including the potential and performance of residential and commercial energy storage products and other new product offerings; and assumptions relating to the foregoing. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved, if at all. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. In order to meet our projections, we will need to expand our workforce and increase the efficiency of our sales and installation operations relative to what we have achieved to date. Additional key risks and uncertainties include the effect of electric utility industry regulations, net metering and related policies; the availability and amount of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives; the level of demand for our solar energy systems; the availability of a sufficient, timely, and cost-effective supply of solar panels and balance of system components in each of our geographies; our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses, operations and personnel; our ability to achieve manufacturing economies of scale and associated cost reductions, our expectations regarding the Riverbend agreement and the development and construction of the Riverbend facility, including expected capital and operating expenses and the performance of our manufacturing operations; the effects of existing and future tariffs and other trade barriers; changes in federal tax treatment; the availability and amount of financing from fund investors; the retail price of utility-generated electricity or the availability of alternative energy sources; risks associated with SolarCity’s rapid growth; risks associated with international expansion; the success of our product development efforts and customer preferences; risks that consumers who have executed energy contracts may seek to cancel those contracts; assumptions as to the value under energy contracts and contract renewal rates and terms, including applicable net present values, performance-based incentives, and other rebates, credits and expenses; SolarCity’s limited operating history, particularly as a new public company; changes in strategic planning decisions by management or reallocation of internal resources; and general market, political, economic and business conditions. You should read the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and subsequent Current Reports on Form 8-K, which have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which identify certain of these and additional risks and uncertainties. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law. Forward-Looking Statements 2
  • 3. B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y V A L U E O F A S S E T S M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3
  • 4. Strategy Update  Organic origination of long-term Energy Contracts at lower acquisition costs  Best-in-class installation costs through proprietary technology  Monetization of a higher portion of the value of our Energy Contracts through low-cost, long duration financing  Exploring monetization of the full value of some Energy Contracts  Be a catalyst in de-carbonizing the energy infrastructure 4
  • 5. Introduction: Business Drivers and Metrics Leadership of a Growing Opportunity Monetization of Energy Contracts and Creation of Asset Value Investment in Best-in Class Technology Metric Unit 2014 2015 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 U.S. Power Capacity: U.S. Installed Generating Capacity GW-AC 1,161 1,169 1,172 1,177 1,182 1,171 1,176 Distributed Solar as % of U.S. Generating Capacity % 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% U.S. Installed Distributed Solar Capacity GW-DC 6.7 7.3 7.9 8.6 9.2 10.0 10.8 New U.S. Installed Distributed Solar Capacity MW-DC 483 564 559 719 682 697 796 SCTY Units: SCTY % of New U.S. Distributed Solar Capacity % 17% 19% 25% 25% 22% 27% 32% MW Installed MW 82 107 138 177 153 189 256 MW Deployed MW 82 107 137 176 143 177 205 MW PTO'd MW 83 79 113 138 160 156 203 Energy Contract Pricing of New Deployments (Yr. 1) $/kWh $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 Annual Escalator % 1.7% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% SREC (5-Yr. Portfolio Average) $/kWh $0.01 $0.01 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 Energy Harvest (Yr. 1) kWh/kW 1,425 1,416 1,406 1,402 1,404 1,379 1,352 Value Generation and Monetization: Asset Financing in Period (including rebates)* $/W $2.69 $2.04 $2.62 $2.28 $2.35 $2.33 $3.20 Contracted Value of MW Deployed in Period † $/W $3.68 $3.55 $3.37 $3.24 $3.44 $3.49 $3.50 Renewal Value of MW Deployed in Period † $/W $0.38 $0.40 $0.38 $0.34 $0.33 $0.34 $0.36 Total Value of MW Deployed in Period $/W $4.06 $3.95 $3.74 $3.58 $3.77 $3.83 $3.86 Cost per Watt**: Sales $/W $0.51 $0.47 $0.49 $0.57 $0.59 $0.53 $0.64 Installation $/W $2.44 $2.28 $2.19 $2.09 $2.09 $2.13 $1.92 G&A $/W $0.30 $0.26 $0.21 $0.20 $0.27 $0.24 $0.27 Total Cost per Watt $/W $3.25 $3.01 $2.89 $2.86 $2.95 $2.91 $2.84 R&D Expenses $M ($1.9) ($3.0) ($4.2) ($10.0) ($12.1) ($12.4) ($17.7) Capital Expenditures $M ($4.7) ($2.9) ($5.8) ($9.5) ($30.5) ($71.6) ($45.7) Change in Working Capital Q/Q $M $28.3 $22.7 $37.0 ($38.1) ($72.3) ($31.7) ($41.7) Debt and Cash: Debt - Recourse $M ($176.6) ($349.8) ($165.2) ($149.7) ($290.6) ($419.2) ($518.2) Debt - Convertible $M ($230.0) ($230.0) ($730.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) Cash & Short-Term Investments $M $526.2 $429.6 $756.8 $663.6 $586.2 $497.6 $438.7 Current Portfolio Value Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV Remaining of Cumulative MW Deployed (1.5 GW) $M $2,708 Debt – Non-Recourse $M ($995) Net NPV of Cumulative MW Deployed $M $1,713 Proprietary Origination at Lower Cost Operating Cost Excellence 5 * Weighted average of Q1-Q3 2015 Asset Financing is $2.68 ** Cost per Watt is based on our quarterly cost calculation methodology we detail on our website † Updated since original report
  • 6. B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y V A L U E O F A S S E T S M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6
  • 7. Solar Represents a Plurality of New U.S. Power Capacity Total U.S. Installed Generating Capacity is ~1,170 GW with 15-20 GW/Yr. of New Gross Capacity since 2010 Distributed Solar Accounted for 22% of New-Build U.S. Generating Capacity in 1H15 with Utility-Scale at 23% 1,110 1,120 1,130 1,140 1,150 1,160 1,170 1,180 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TotalInstalledCapacity(GW) New-BuildCapacity(GW) New Build U.S. Generating Capacity U.S. Total Installed Capacity 3% 5% 5% 11% 12% 22% 1% 3% 6% 17% 21% 23% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1H15 %ofNew-BuildU.S.GeneratingCapacity Utility-Scale Solar 0.6 1.1 1.6 1.9 2.3 1.4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1H15 GWInstalled >20% of New U.S. Capacity was Distributed Solar in 1H152 U.S. Distributed Solar Grew at a 40% CAGR 2010 to 20143 15-20 GW of New U.S. Generating Capacity per Year1 7 Distributed
  • 8. Solar is Competitive in a Significant Portion of the U.S. Avg. U.S. Retail Electricity Price Is ~$0.13/kWh with 583 TWh Consumed at that Price or Higher4 Total U.S. Residential and Commercial Electricity Sales ≥$0.13/kWh Exceeded $90 Billion in 2014 0 100 200 300 400 500 < $0.08 < $0.09 < $0.10 < $0.11 < $0.12 < $0.13 < $0.14 < $0.16 < $0.18 < $0.20 > $0.20 U.S.ResidentialandCommercial ElectricityConsumption(TWh) Average Retail Utility Price ($/kWh) NY MA NC CT AZGA CA MDTX FL PA HI SolarCity Service States Non-SolarCity Service States 8
  • 9. Retail Utility Rates Are Rising on Infrastructure Spending Retail Utility Rates Have Increased despite Lower Energy Prices Due to Infrastructure Capex CA Rate Reform is Increasing Investor-Owned Utilities’ Baseline Tier 1 Residential Rates Initially to >$0.17/kWh in 2017 $0.06 $0.08 $0.10 $0.12 $0.14 $0.16 $0.18 2004 2009 2014 Avg.ResidentialUtilityRate ($/kWh) $0.15 $0.16 $0.17$0.17 $0.20 $0.23 $0.20 $0.21 $0.25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SCE PG&E SDG&E ResidentialUtilityRates($/kWh) Old Tier One (1H15) Tier One (2017)* Tier One (2019)*U.S. Avg.Avg. in Our 19 States New CA Rate Reform Increasing Tier One Rates6Utility Rates in SolarCity Geographies Are Up 49% since 20045 * Assumes 3% Additional Annual Rate Inflation 3.4% CAGR 4.1% CAGR 9
  • 10. Cleaner, Lower Cost Energy Solar PPAs, Leases, and Loans Lower Customers’ Energy Bills for No Initial Investment  No upfront cost for installation required  Solar energy paid for monthly at a lower $/kWh price than charged by the local utility  Our solar contracts typically generate 50-90% of a customer’s annual electricity needs  Customers able to generate savings of up to 20% from Day One Avg. Annual Year-1 Savings Of > $400 in California SOLARCITY EXAMPLE OF A CALIFORNIA PPA WITH NO DOWN PAYMENT SolarCity Bill New Utility Bill New Avg. Bill ~$1,848 /Yr. Old Avg. Bill ~$2,256 /Yr. $0.15/kWh $0.15-0.19/kWh*$0.19/kWh * Because of tiered pricing based on usage in California, the output from solar energy systems also lowers the rate charged by the utility 10
  • 11. SolarCity U.S. Service Territories Total U.S. Total U.S. Residential Solar Installations at the End of Q2 2015 7 0.68M 0.73M / Total U.S. Single Family Housing Units 8 41.3M 92.2M = Distributed Solar Penetration of U.S. Single-Family Homes 1.7% 0.8% Despite Continued Growth, Solar Penetration Remains Low U.S. Solar Penetration of Both Residential and Commercial Buildings Is Below 1% Residential Solar Is Installed on Only 1.7% of Single Family Homes in SolarCity’s U.S. Service Territories  Over 733k residential solar homes in the United States as of the end of Q2 2015 with ~190k new residential installations in 2014.7  635k new single-family home permits across the Country in 2014, expanding the opportunity.9  Less than 1% solar penetration of the 5.6M commercial buildings in the U.S.10 11
  • 12. The Clear Leader in U.S. Distributed Solar Installations SolarCity is the Largest U.S. Residential and Commercial Solar Installer Installed 28% of Distributed Solar, 15% of Total Solar, and 7% of New Gross Power Capacity in the U.S. 1Q-3Q15 3% 6% 6% 5% 7% 7% 22% 7% 8% 11% 17% 25% 33% 37% 11% 10% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15 SCTY 3Q15 Resi Installer No. 2 3Q15 Resi Installer No. 3 %ofU.S.DistributedSolarInstalled11 Commercial Residential SolarCity accounted for more than 1% of all solar installed globally this year 22% 32% Blended 12
  • 13. Potential to Expand SolarCity’s Core Expertise Globally  Acquired ILIOSS for $10M in Aug. 2015  Strong track record with major Mexican corporations SOLARCITY IS NOW A LEADING C&I INSTALLER IN MEXICO  International opportunities expected to benefit from lower global module pricing and lower labor costs outside the United States  Exploring partnerships with potential long-term asset owners Example Countries Australia Chile Italy Kenya Residential Utility Rates ($/kWh) $0.23 $0.15 $0.26 $0.24 Commercial Utility Rates ($/kWh) $0.16 $0.09 $0.19 $0.10 Solar Insolation (kWh/kW) ~1,500 ~1,800 ~1,200 ~1,400 EXPLORING MORE FOREIGN OPPORTUNITIES12 13
  • 14. Regulatory Update  The California Public Utilities Commission’s forthcoming decision on NEM 2.0 is expected to not significantly affect economics for new customers, as state law requires that the new tariff ensure that customer-sited DG “continues to grow sustainably”  New York removed its NEM cap through 12/31/16 while a comprehensive docket called Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) seeks to appropriately value distributed solar/clean energy  Though Hawaii’s public utilities commission capped the state’s NEM program at existing levels, Hawaii is a unique state that (a) already has double-digit rooftop solar penetration and (b) has a very high cost of energy with wholesale rates above the cost of distributed solar  In Arizona, utility SRP’s implementation of anti-solar rate design changes for new installations is being challenged in Arizona federal court  Extension growing increasingly likely as we approach the step-down in the ITC from 30% to 10% on 1/1/17  Nevertheless, we are approaching our business assuming no extension STATE NET ENERGY METERING (NEM) POLICIES FEDERAL INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT (ITC) 14
  • 15. Regulators Are Continuing Net Energy Metering Regulators Tend to View Distributed Solar Positively Because Its Benefits Outweigh Its Costs State-developed mandatory rules for certain utilities No uniform or statewide mandatory rules but some utilities allow No net energy metering State-developed net energy metering rules ended for new customers 15
  • 16. B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y V A L U E O F A S S E T S M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 16
  • 17. Project Cash Flow Driven by Units, Production, and Pricing Solar Insolation Annual hours of sunshine on the panels adjusted for tilt and azimuth X System Size Capacity (kW or MW) = Annual Energy Production Estimated kilowatt-hours (kWh) of solar energy produced in year one X $0.13/kWh ( Energy Contract Price All the energy produced by the solar system is sold to the customer at an established $/kWh price with an annual escalator (includes performance-based incentives) + + $0.035/kWh SREC Price ) Portfolio average, e.g., $0 in California Certain states require non-renewable energy generators to purchase Solar Renewable Energy Certificates to meet state renewable energy portfolio standards = = $1,486 (or $0.22/W) Energy Contract Revenue Annual revenue is the customer bill plus payments for SRECs. Customers contract for 20 years and we expect to provide energy to the home for at least 30 years 1,332 Hours 260W x 26 Panels = 6.8kW 9,004 kWh 751 Avg. FICO Investment-grade off-taker BILL SREC * *Average of 3Q15 Lease/PPA Deployed; Q315 average including MyPower is 1,352 hours 17
  • 18. Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Energy Production kWh/kW 1,332 1,325 1,319 1,312 1,306 1,299 1,293 1,286 1,280 1,273 1,267 1,261 1,254 1,248 1,242 1,236 1,229 1,223 1,217 1,211 Annual Degradation (0.5%) Contract (+PBI) Price $/kWh $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 $0.14 $0.14 $0.14 $0.14 $0.15 $0.15 $0.15 $0.16 $0.16 $0.17 $0.17 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 Annual Escalator 2.2% SREC $/kWh $0.04 $0.03 $0.03 $0.02 $0.01 Rebates/Prepayments $/W $0.10 Project Revenue $/W $0.22 $0.21 $0.21 $0.20 $0.20 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.24 O&M Expenses $/W ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.18) ($0.02) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) Gross Project Cash Flow $/W $0.10 $0.20 $0.19 $0.19 $0.18 $0.17 $0.16 $0.16 $0.17 $0.17 $0.17 $0.02 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 Year 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30** Energy Production 1,205 1,199 1,193 1,187 1,181 1,175 1,169 1,163 1,158 1,152 Annual Degradation Contract (+PBI) Price $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23 Annual Escalator SREC Project Revenue $0.22 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.25 $0.25 $0.26 $0.26 $0.27 O&M Expenses ($0.15) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.03) ($0.04) ($0.04) ($0.04) Gross Project Cash Flow $0.07 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23 Gross Project Cash Flows (Pre-ITC) Valued at $2.56/W NPV The Foundation of Our Value Creation Rests Upon the Cash Flow Stream of the Underlying Assets Q3 2015 NPV of Lease/PPA Gross Project Cash Flows before the Investment Tax Credit/Depreciation Was $2.56/W at a 6% Discount Rate $/W UNIT ECONOMICS FOR THE 172 MW OF LEASES/PPAS DEPLOYED IN Q3 2015: 30-Year NPV: $2.56/W  Rebates/Prepayments: $0.10/W (upfront)  Contracted NPV: $2.02/W (discounted at 6%)  Renewal NPV: $0.44/W (discounted at 6%) * Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W ** Renewal assumes SolarCity continues to provide energy to the home at a 10% discount to the utility price at the time of renewal Note: Excludes default rates In aggregate, the lease/PPA MW Deployed in Q3 2015 are expected to generate unlevered Gross Project Cash Flow (pre-tax equity distributions) of ~$34M in Year One (172 MW x $0.20/W) Excludes MyPower MW Deployed (See Appendix A) 18
  • 19. Tax Equity Primer $/W $/W % of Return Cash Investment in Project ($1.77) Investment Tax Credit offsetting income tax $1.36 65% Depreciation offsetting income tax over life of partnership $0.29 14% Cash Flow from project $0.46 22% Total Nominal Return $2.11 100%  The Investment Tax Credit (ITC) available under Section 48 of the IRC currently includes a 30% tax credit for solar systems on residential and commercial properties, which is scheduled to be reduced to 10% after December 31, 2016.  While the current ITC focuses primarily on renewable energy property, various iterations of the ITC have existed since 1962, and over its history the ITC has been used by Congress to spur investment in a multitude of industries.  ITC is part of broader General Business Credit under Section 38 that provides tax credits to various asset types, including low income housing, new markets, carbon sequestration, marginal oil wells, and dozens of other industries. HISTORY ECONOMICS  Pool of sophisticated investors comprised of leading financial institutions and corporates investing for an attractive risk adjusted return  Investor base continues to expand as asset class matures INVESTOR BASE SELECT TAX EQUITY INVESTORS  Partnership with SolarCity as 1% Member and Tax Equity as 99% Member  Investment structured with projected “flip” and tenor 6.5 years  Tax Equity partner receives the ITC, accelerated depreciation benefits and a share of cash flow  After Tax Equity partner reaches a target IRR, their partnership interest flips down to 5% and SolarCity can exercise a buyout of the Tax Equity’s interest PARTNERSHIP STRUCTURE % Benefit to Tax Equity Partner Pre-Flip Post-Flip ITC / Depreciation 99% 0% Cash Flow 30-40% 5-10%  After-tax IRR 7% to 12%; pre-tax cash IRR 2% to 5%  Tax Equity partner funds $1.75-1.80 / W ($4.55 Fair Market Value * 30% ITC * 1.28 funding multiple)  Return is comprised of 65% ITC, 14% depreciation, 22% cash flow 19
  • 20. Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 15 Gross Project Cash Flow $0.10 $0.20 $0.19 $0.19 $0.18 $0.17 $0.16 $0.16 $0.17 $0.17 $0.17 $0.02 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 Tax Equity Investment $1.77 Tax Equity Distributions ($0.07) ($0.07) ($0.07) ($0.06) ($0.06) ($0.06) ($0.05) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) Unlevered Project Cash Flow to SCTY $1.87 $0.13 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.11 $0.10 $0.11 $0.15 $0.16 $0.16 $0.01 $0.17 $0.17 $0.17 $0.18 SCTY Share of Cash Flow 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 67% 92% 92% 92% 51% 93% 93% 93% 93% Tax Equity Share of Cash Flow 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 33% 8% 8% 8% 49% 7% 7% 7% 7% Year 16 17 18 19 20 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30** Gross Project Cash Flow $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.07 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22 $0.23 $0.23 Tax Equity Distributions ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) Unlevered Project Cash Flow to SCTY $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.06 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 SCTY Share of Cash Flow 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 82% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% Tax Equity Share of Cash Flow 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 18% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Unlevered Cash Flow After-Tax Equity Valued at $3.87/W*** In Addition, Tax Equity Enables the Monetization of the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) in Year One Tax Equity Invests $1.75-1.80/W in Return for a Portion of Gross Project Cash Flow and Most of the 30% ITC/Depreciation 30-Year Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV: $3.87/W  Tax equity investment: $1.77/W (upfront)  Rebates/Customer prepayments: $0.10/W (upfront)  Contracted Unlevered NPV: $1.59/W (discounted at 6%)  Renewal Unlevered NPV: $0.41/W (discounted at 6%) * Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W ** Renewal assumes SolarCity continues to provide energy to the home at a 10% discount to the price at the time of renewal *** Unlevered Cash Flow Value of $3.87/W on this slide only includes Leases/PPAs; the $3.86/W reference on Slide 5 is a blend including MyPower Note: Excludes default rates UNLEVERED PROJECT CASH FLOW OF LEASES/PPAS WITH A 30% ITC Tax Equity Share of Cash Flows:  Pre-Flip: 30-40%  Post-Flip: 5-10% 20
  • 21. Levering Cash Flows Yields $2.76 upfront Non-Recourse Project Debt Is Used to Help Fund the Upfront Investment and Target Day One Cash Aggregation Facility Debt Currently Funds $0.80-0.90/W and Is Expected to Be Refinanced with Long-Term ABS Debt 30-Year Pre-Tax NPV: $3.87/W  Tax equity investment: $1.77/W (upfront)  Rebates/Customer prepayments: $0.10/W (upfront)  Debt monetization: $0.89/W (upfront)  Contracted Levered NPV: $0.70/W  Renewal Levered NPV: $0.41/W * Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W ** Aggregation Facility debt assumes the terms of current aggregation facilities (2-yr. maturity) *** Assumes ABS debt is issued to refinance the aggregation facility debt after two years, an 18-year amortization period, and the average interest rate of our first 4 ABS issuances of 4.5% (the most recent LMC-4 issuance was at 4.4% including fees) Note: Excludes default rates LEVERED PROJECT CASH FLOW WITH A 30% ITC $/W 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 Unlevered Project Cash Flow $1.87 $0.13 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.11 $0.10 $0.11 $0.15 $0.16 $0.16 $0.01 $0.17 $0.17 $0.17 Aggregation Facility Proceeds/Paydown** $0.89 ($0.05) ($0.84) Aggregation Facility Debt Service** 2.75% ($0.02) ($0.02) Expected ABS Debt Proceeds*** $0.97 ABS Debt Service*** 4.50% ($0.08) ($0.08) ($0.08) ($0.07) ($0.07) ($0.10) ($0.10) ($0.11) ($0.11) ($0.11) ($0.11) ($0.10) Levered Project Cash Flow $2.76 $0.05 $0.24 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04 $0.03 $0.04 $0.05 $0.05 $0.05 ($0.10) $0.06 $0.06 $0.07 $/W 15 16 17 18 19 20 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Unlevered Project Cash Flow $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.06 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 Aggregation Facility Proceeds/Paydown** Aggregation Facility Debt Service** Expected ABS Debt Proceeds*** ABS Debt Service*** ($0.11) ($0.11) ($0.10) ($0.03) Levered Project Cash Flow $0.07 $0.08 $0.08 $0.16 $0.19 $0.20 $0.06 $0.18 $0.18 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 21
  • 22. >50% of Value Is Monetized Upfront and the Rest Retained * Unlevered contracted cash flow net of operations and maintenance expenses and tax equity distributions ** Non-recourse aggregation facility debt issuance at a 56% advance rate and a 2.5-3.0% interest rate with the potential to subsequently term out through ABS debt at a 66% advance rate and a 4.5-5.0% interest rate $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 Total Value of MW Deployed Upfront Cash Remaining Value not Monetized Upfront $perWatt Tax Equity Investment Plus Rebates/ Prepayments: $1.87/W Contracted Post-Tax Equity: $1.59/W* Debt Monetization: $0.89/W** Renewal: $0.41/W Renewal: $0.41/W $3.87/W Retention of Contract $0.70/W Renewal: $0.41/W Unlevered Sale of Contract $0.55/W Tax Equity Investment Plus Rebates/ Prepayments: $1.87/W $2.76/W Retention of approximately 1/3 of contract value and 100% of renewal >50% of total value and 56% of contracted value monetized upfront at 2.5-3.0%, and ultimately 66% in securitizations at 4.5-5.0% 6% Discount rate 6% Discount rate 22
  • 23. Hypothetical Unlevered Cash Flow with a 10% ITC of ~$3.32/W With a 10% ITC, Tax Equity Investment Could Fall to $0.45-0.50/W and Pre-Flip Distributions to ~10% Offsetting the Decline in the ITC from 30% to 10%, We Expect Contract Pricing to Be Higher By ~$0.02/kWh by 2017 30-Year Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV: $3.32/W  Tax equity investment: $0.48/W (upfront)  Rebates/Customer prepayments: $0.10/W (upfront)  Contract NPV: $2.23/W (discounted at 6%)  Renewal NPV: $0.52/W (discounted at 6%) * Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W ** Renewal assumes SolarCity continues to provide energy to the home at a 10% discount to the price at the time of renewal Note: Excludes default rates HYPOTHETICAL UNLEVERED PROJECT CASH FLOW OF LEASES/PPAS WITH A 10% ITC 23 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 15 Gross Project Cash Flow $0.22 $0.22 $0.21 $0.21 $0.20 $0.19 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.06 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22 $0.23 Customer Preyaments/State Rebates $0.10 Tax Equity Investment $0.48 Tax Equity Distributions ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.02) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) Unlevered Project Cash Flow $0.58 $0.20 $0.20 $0.19 $0.19 $0.18 $0.17 $0.18 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.05 $0.21 $0.21 $0.22 $0.22 SCTY Share of Cash Flow 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 91% 98% 98% 98% 93% 98% 98% 98% Tax Equity Share of Cash Flow 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 9% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 2% 2% Year 16 17 18 19 20 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30** Gross Project Cash Flow $0.23 $0.24 $0.24 $0.25 $0.25 $0.11 $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.25 $0.25 $0.26 $0.26 $0.27 $0.27 Tax Equity Distributions ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.01) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.00) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) ($0.01) Unlevered Project Cash Flow $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.24 $0.25 $0.10 $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.24 $0.25 $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 $0.27 SCTY Share of Cash Flow 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 96% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% Tax Equity Share of Cash Flow 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
  • 24. Multiple Options to Monetize Unlevered Cash Flows $/W 30% ITC 10% ITC Upfront Asset Financing: Tax Equity Investment $1.77/W $0.48/W Rebates & Prepayments $0.10/W $0.10/W Aggregation Facility Debt $0.89/W $1.26/W Total Upfront Asset Financing $2.76/W $1.84/W Remaining Value: $1.20/W $1.60/W Contracted Levered NPV** $0.70/W $0.95/W Renewal Levered NPV $0.41/W $0.52/W Value of MW Deployed $3.87/W $3.32/W CURRENT STRATEGY IS TO MAXIMIZE UPFRONT MONETIZATION EQUITY INVESTMENTS FROM 3RD PARTY FINANCIAL BUYERS ALSO POSSIBLE $/W 30% ITC 10% ITC Upfront Asset Financing: Tax Equity Investment $1.77/W $0.48/W Rebates & Prepayments $0.10/W $0.10/W Equity Investment at 7% unlevered IRR* $1.46/W $2.05/W Total Upfront Asset Financing $3.33/W $2.63/W Remaining Value: Renewal Value Yrs. 21-30 $0.41/W $0.52/W Value of MW Deployed $3.74/W $3.15/W *Illustrative example; equity investment in contracted cashflows at 8% unlevered IRR would yield $1.34/W and total asset monetization of $3.21 ** Additional ability to monetize another $0.10 through securitization 5.5% 6.9% 7.4% 7.7% 8.9% NEP Comparable YieldCo Average CAFD NYLD Unlevered Year 1 Yield of Contracted Sale at 7% IRR* DividendYields(2016 Consensus) COMPARABLE YIELDCOS 24
  • 25. NPV of Portfolio’s Levered Project Cash Flows of $1.7B*(excluding SRECs) The NPV of Unlevered Project Cash Flows to SolarCity is $2.7 Billion; Project Non-Recourse Debt is $1.0 billion Power Co Portfolio as of 9/30/15 Cumulative Deployments under an Energy Contract 1.5 GW** Annual Energy Harvest (2016) 1,400 Average Contract Price (2016) $0.126/kWh Tax Equity % of net cashflow (2016) 43% Project Debt ($M) $995 Blended Cost of Debt (%) 4.5% * Excludes SRECs ** Cumulative Deployments under an Energy Contract of 1.5GW excludes 0.1 GW of System Sales 25 -50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0 450.0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 O&M Cash to Tax Equity Debt Service Levered Cashflows to SC Cash flows generated by Energy Contracts
  • 26. Strong Asset Quality with Predictable Performance Underlying Asset is Contracted Cash Flow that Represents Customers’ Monthly Energy Bills Low Delinquency Rates and the Predictability of Solar Irradiation Provide High Visibility into Cash Payment Stream 180+ Day Delinquency Rates are Low and Holding Steady kWh Production is Coming in Largely within Forecast 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4%0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% Oct 14 Nov 14 Dec 14 Jan 15 Feb 15 Mar 15 Apr 15 May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Delinquenciesas%ofBillings  Average FICO score of residential portfolio was >750 as of 9/30/15  Commercial customers largely consist of municipalities and investment grade corporations 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Sep 14 Oct 14 Nov 14 Dec 14 Jan 15 Feb 15 Mar 15 Apr 15 May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Energy(MWh) Actual/Underwritten% Actual Energy (MWh) Underwritten Estimate (MWh) Actual/Underwritten % 26
  • 27. B U S I N E S S K E Y D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y V A L U E O F A S S E T S M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 27
  • 28. Strategy Targets Lower Cost, Longer Term Financing Non-Recourse Term Financing Solar Bonds $334m Facility at 3.25% + LIBOR Corporate Revolver Tax Equity Non-Recourse Aggregation Facilities $650M Facility at 2.75% + LIBOR Long-Term Debt Securitization at 4.3%-4.8% and Rated A and BBB+ 0-1 Year 0-5 Year 8-13+ Years Development and Construction Financing (DevCo) Asset Ownership (PowerCo) 28 $240M Facility at 3.25% + LIBOR
  • 29. $0.1 $0.3 $0.4 $0.4 $0.8 $1.7 $2.6 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1Q-Q3 NewCommittedProject Financing($B) Strong Track Record and Visibility into Financing  Issued first asset-backed securitization (ABS) of distributed solar assets in Q4 2013  Four ABS transactions to date raised $450 million in non-recourse debt collateralized by 317 MW of distributed solar  Total Tax Equity Financing Raised: $4.4B  Tax equity capacity: $929M  Aggregation facility capacity: $398M  MyPower conduit capacity: $77M (increased by $40M in Q4 2015)  Revolver capacity: $19M (increased by $65M in Q4 2015)  Cash and short-term investments: $439M STRONG FINANCING TRACK RECORD $1.4B IN COMMITTED/UNDRAWN FUNDING AS OF 9/30/15 29
  • 30. Debt Outstanding as of the End of Q3 2015 Terms (Yrs.) Underlying MW $M Outstanding at End of 3Q15 Pre-Tax Cost Recourse Payment Schedule Investment-Grade ABS Debt 8-13 317 $425M 4-5% Non-Rec. Amortizing Aggregation/ MyPower Facilities 2-3 764 $570M 3-4% Non-Rec. Amortizing Revolver and Other* <1 $308M 3-4% Recourse Term Solar Bonds 1-15 $211M 1-6% Recourse Term Convertible Debt 5 $796M 2-3% Recourse Term MW Inspected - No Back Leverage 188 MW Inspected – Fully monetized 225 PowerCo Debt DevCo Debt * Includes revolver debt of $295 and other debt of $13M $123M LMC4 Issued at 4.4% WACC and Rated A Weighted- Average 2.2% interest rate and 1.3 Yrs. Remaining Term 30
  • 31. Short Term Maturities Extended to 2017 Revolving Debt Facility Maturity Extended and Capacity Increased Revolving Aggregation Facilities Enable the Recycling of Assets and Are Expected to Be Upsized and Renewed Outstanding (9/30/15) 2016 2017 Revolver $295M Prior Maturity: Dec. 2016 New Maturity: Dec. 2017 Solar Bonds $211M $176M Due: Sept. 2016 Expected to Be Rolled Over MyPower Facilities $123M Jan. 2017 Strategy to term out in longer duration ABS Aggregation Facilities $447M Option for one yr. extension on Dec. 2017 maturity Strategy to term out in longer duration ABS 31
  • 32. B U S I N E S S K E Y D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y V A L U E O F A S S E T S M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 32
  • 33. Installation Process for Customers Includes Six Steps Sale Survey Design Permit Install PTO
  • 34. Improving Customer Wait Times 34 MEDIAN DAYS FROM BOOKING TO INSTALL HAS FALLEN ~50% SINCE JANUARY 2013 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Apr-15 Jul-15 Oct-15 MedianDaysfromBookingtoInstall 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Q32015Installations Days from Booking to Install
  • 35. Our Process Results in High Customer Satisfaction 60% 70% 80% 90% NPSScore% Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 * Net promoter score is based on a scale of 1-10 in which the percentage of 0-6 scores is subtracted from 9-10 scores 35
  • 36. 36
  • 37. 37
  • 38. 38
  • 39. 39
  • 40. 40
  • 41. 41
  • 42. 42
  • 43. 43
  • 44. 44
  • 45. 45
  • 46. 46
  • 47. 47
  • 48. 48
  • 49. 49
  • 50. B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y V A L U E O F A S S E T S M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50
  • 51. Proprietary Origination at Scale MW Booked Grew at a Compounded Annual Rate of 95% from Q3 2013 to Q3 2015 As We Continued to Drive Higher Growth, Sales Unit Costs Increased over the Last 2 Years from $0.40/W to $0.64/W $0.40 $0.43 $0.51 $0.47 $0.49 $0.57 $0.59 $0.53 $0.64 $0.61 $0.59 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 SCTY 3Q15 Comp A 3Q15 Comp B SalesCost($/W) 51 91 101 136 218 230 206 237 395 345 95 71 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 SCTY 3Q15 Comp A 3Q15 Comp B MWBookedinPeriod
  • 52. Lead generation Close  Performance Marketing  Retail partners  Home Builder partners  Malls  Events  Canvassing  Ambassadors  Referrals • In-home consultation • Phone consultation • Online MallCartTheHomeDepotDigitalAd Diversified residential sales channels 52
  • 53. Formulaic Growth in Commercial Sales 2013 2014 2015 YTD CommercialMWBooked CommercialSalesRepsbyCategory Public Sector National Accounts Agriculture/Water Mexico MW Booked 53
  • 54. Reallocating Resources to Lower Cost Sales Channels Sales Costs Vary Significantly by Channel SolarCity Already has Channels Operating at Goal Cost Structures Avg. $0.64 MW Installed by Channel SalesCostbyChannel ($/W) 54 Note: We will not be disclosing this level of granularity on a regular basis
  • 55. Achieving Our Sales Cost Goal of $0.40/W Goal Is to Reallocate Resources and Drive Productivity to Improve Cost of Acquisition $0.64 $0.40 $0.14 $0.10 $0.00 $0.10 $0.20 $0.30 $0.40 $0.50 $0.60 Sales Cost 3Q15 Channel Mix Effect Initiatives incl. Productivity Improvement Sales Cost Goal SalesCost($/W) 55
  • 56. B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y V A L U E O F A S S E T S M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 56
  • 57. 18 34 15 17 17 28 14 21 5362 70 67 90 120 148 139 168 203 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 MWsInstalledinPeriod Commercial Residential Best-in-Class Operations Lead the Way in Volumes and Costs MW Installed Have Grown 80% per Year since 2013 to Annualized Pace of >1 GW Installation Cost/Watt of <$2.00/W is the Lowest Among Publicly-Reported Companies 57 * Installation cost is based on MW Deployed and tranched in period, which was a higher mix of lower cost residential installation in Q3 2015 $2.65 $2.49 $2.44 $2.28 $2.19 $2.09 $2.09 $2.13 $1.92 $2.27 $2.87 $1.00 $1.25 $1.50 $1.75 $2.00 $2.25 $2.50 $2.75 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 SCTY 3Q15 Comp. A 3Q15 Comp. B InstallationCost($/W) *
  • 58. Safety and Quality Have Improved with Growth 58 TRAINING PROGRAM  4 training academies  All installers go through rigorous employment training before setting foot on a job site  Follow up with continued education online and in person  General leadership training at SolarCity headquarters  Dedicated training team SCTY vs. OSHA Incidence Rates13 Recordable Rate Lost Days SolarCity 1.8 0.3 Construction (All) 3.6 1.3 Specialty Trade 3.8 1.4 FEWER INCIDENTS AND LOST DAYS THAN COMPARABLE INDUSTRIES 2013-12 2014-03 2014-06 2014-09 2014-12 2015-03 2015-06 2015-09 FailureRate CumulativeInstallations Month of failure case creation Jobs in Fleet Inverter Failure Rate Installer Error Rate QUALITY: FAILURE RATES HOLDING STEADY WITH VOLUMES For every 100 employees, SolarCity experiences 1.8 recordable injuries/ illnesses (incl. non-serious) in a given year (vs. 3.6 for the construction industry). 0.3 of these incidents have lead to missed days (vs. 1.3 for construction).
  • 59. SolarCity Product Quality  SolarCity partners with select Tier-1 suppliers and requires them to meet our standards for product and manufacturing excellence, with rigorous third party testing on an ongoing basis  China-based SolarCity quality team (8 staff) and third party auditing firms visit supplier factories on regular basis to ensure our products are built to specification  SolarCity believes that the Useful Life of the Solar modules used in our installations exceeds 35 years. 59
  • 60. Infrastructure in Place to Serve Key U.S. Solar Geographies With 81 Operations Centers, We Are within 30 Minutes of 90% of the Population in Our Geographies14 Our Differentiated Logistics Network Enables Low Costs and Faster Customer Response Time 6 6 14 17 25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15 Cumulative New Operations Centers Opened Cumulative 60
  • 61. Zep Offers Proprietary Means to Lower Unit Labor Costs Zep Has Enabled Installation Crews to Double Productivity InstallationHoursperkWInstalled Zep Non-Zep* * Small sample size Single mounting system offers efficiencies in training, quality, safety, and maintenance 61
  • 62. Certain Operations Centers and Commercial Projects Already Performing Above Goals Q32015InstallationCost($/W) New Offices Mature Offices at Operational Excellence Offices Focused On Being Optimized Average Q32015InstallationCost($//W) Carports Ground-Mount and Rooftop Average Q3 2015 Commercial Installations81 Operations Centers RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL * Some Q3 2015 installation costs will flow through Q4 2015 cost per watt as MW are deployed and tranched Note: We will not be disclosing this level of granularity on a regular basis 62
  • 63. Reducing Installation Cost Goal to $1.50/W Lower Hardware Prices and Soft Costs Are Each Expected to Drive ~50% of Cost Reductions $1.02 $1.50 $0.90 $0.22 $0.10 $0.10 $0.00 $0.25 $0.50 $0.75 $1.00 $1.25 $1.50 $1.75 $2.00 Installation Cost 3Q15 Hardware Price Reductions Normalizing Higher Cost Operations Centers to Avg and Lower Mix of Higher Cost Carports* Other Initiatives Installation Cost Goal AverageTotalCostperWatt $1.92 Soft Costs Hardware Costs * Current economics in some states support carports but lower revenue numbers will reduce carport projects that generate enough returns 63
  • 64. B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y V A L U E O F A S S E T S M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 64
  • 65. Broad Technology Portfolio SOLAR MODULES  Silevo Tunneling Junction  High efficiency / low cost  World record module efficiency of >22% certified by Renewable Energy Test Center  System design automation  Energy production forecasting  Logistics and resource management  Utility rate tariff database  Energy usage evaluations  Customer account management  Customer applications SOFTWARE  Fast installation, lower cycle time  Superior aesthetics MOUNTING HARDWARE & BALANCE OF SYSTEM  Real-time energy monitoring  Voltage control  Energy storage integration GRID CONTROL SYSTEMS 65
  • 66. Integrated Module Production Offers New Cost Advantage Vertical Integration into Module Manufacturing to Provide Competitive Edge in Costs and Aesthetics 2017 Goal Is to Produce Modules at a Lower Cost of $0.55/W at a Higher Module Efficiency of 21-22% Traditional Silicon Modules Silevo Module Panel Wattage (60-cell) 260 350 Module Efficiency (Cell Efficiency) ~15% (~18%) 21-22% (24%) Additional Energy Harvest - >5% Manufacturing cost goal ($/W) ~$0.55/W Balance of system (BoS) cost reduction - >$0.10/W Module Efficiency of >22% Certified by Renewable Energy Test Center WORLD RECORD MODULE  Silevo’s 350-Watt module is significantly above original 310-W at the time of acquisition due to breakthrough in shingling technology  Silevo cell is bi-facial, which allows for additional energy harvest in commercial and utility-scale installations 66
  • 67. Higher Efficiency Enables Lower Labor and BoS Costs Silevo’s 350-W Module Utilizes 33% Fewer Panels than Traditional Modules on a Typical House Silevo installation 16 panels × 350 Watts per panel = 6 kW System Size Standard installation 24 panels × 260 Watts per panel = 6 kW System Size Additional mounting planes required  Enables fewer balance of system components and lower labor costs  Increases available energy generation in roof-constrained environments Higher Efficiency: 67
  • 68. Largest Solar Panel Factory in the Western Hemisphere  Construction at Buffalo is underway with winter weather incorporated into the schedule  Targeting construction completion and initial equipment installation by Q2 2016  Silevo’s high-volume manufactured product has been validated by Tier 1 financial solutions; installations underway with manufacturing in China and our Fremont facility  SolarCity will be operating the facility but does not own it, which will be our strategic approach towards manufacturing 68
  • 69. Zep Enables Better Aesthetics and More Panels on a Roof Competitor with Traditional Mounting Hardware SolarCity with Zep 69 Note: Competitor image is rendered
  • 70. Proprietary Residential Mounting Hardware Requires Fewer Steps Our Zep Mounting Hardware Simplifies Installation and Eliminates the Need for Rails and Clips Zep Enables Lower Installation Costs by Requiring Fewer Components and Less Labor Hours CORE COMPONENTS ToolsEnd CapArray SkirtGripDC Wire GripCombiner boxGround ZepInterlockLeveling Foot 70
  • 71. Continued Investment in Productivity through Simplification Current Part Count New Part Count 71
  • 72. Commercial Mounting Hardware Offers Unique Solution CORE COMPONENTS Positive AttachmentBallast Pan Zep Tool DC Wire ClipSnap BushingPeak Base Valley Base Ground Zero Bridge AssemblyConduit Assembly Tube Connector ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS 72
  • 73. Storage Enables Energy Independence Market Segment Product Commercial & Industrial DemandLogic reduces peak demand charges Residential Cleaner, more affordable back-up power Remote Communities and the Developing World Microgrids protect against outages and provide more affordable energy Utilities Capacity and power quality services 73 Storage Enables Solar Energy at Night
  • 75. Cleaner, More Affordable, More Resilient Grid A Network of Distributed Solar and Storage Systems Enables a Lower Cost, More Reliable Grid Distributed Energy Resource Aggregation Can Provide Low-Cost Grid Services such as Peak Shaving and Voltage Support 75
  • 76. B U S I N E S S D R I V E R S & M E T R I C S L E A D E R S H I P O F A G R O W I N G O P P O R T U N I T Y V A L U E O F A S S E T S M O N E T I Z A T I O N O F E N E R G Y C O N T R A C T S V E L O C I T Y A N D C O N S I S T E N C Y O F D E P L O Y M E N T S P R O P R I E T A R Y O R I G I N A T I O N A T L O W E R A C Q U I S I T I O N C O S T S O P E R A T I N G C O S T E X C E L L E N C E I N V E S T M E N T I N B E S T - I N - C L A S S T E C H N O L O G Y G U I D A N C E A N D C O N C L U S I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 76
  • 77. Conclusion  Originating new solar installations at an annualized rate of >1 GW  New Energy Contracts generating value of ~$3.86 per Watt today with a 30% ITC (and an estimated $3.32 per Watt with a 10% ITC)  Building solar assets at the best cost of publicly-traded peers of ~$2.84/W with a path to $2.25/W in 2017 and ultimately $2.00/W  Deployed and retained portfolio of 1.5 GW generating $135M in annual unlevered and $55M in annual levered cash flow on average over the next five years and a total 30-Yr. NPV of $1.7 billion (excluding SRECs)  Currently monetizing upfront ~2/3 of the value generated, and exploring options to monetize more of the cash flow in year one  Investing in technology to widen our relative cost advantage and enable greater renewable capacity on existing grid infrastructure - Goal of not owning manufacturing assets on balance sheet 77
  • 78. 83 136 285 503 878- 898 1,250 0 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E* 2016E* MWsInstalledinPeriod Guidance Implies MW Installed Growth of 43% in 2016 vs. 2015 * Based on Q4 2015 guidance of 280-300 MW Installed 78
  • 79. Long-Term Guidance 79 Metric Unit 2014 2015 2017 2019 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 U.S. Power Capacity: U.S. Installed Generating Capacity GW-AC 1,161 1,169 1,172 1,177 1,182 1,171 1,176 Distributed Solar as % of U.S. Generating Capacity % 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% Continued increase in U.S. Installed Distributed Solar Capacity GW-DC 6.7 7.3 7.9 8.6 9.2 10.0 10.8 Distributed solar generation penetration New U.S. Installed Distributed Solar Capacity MW-DC 483 564 559 719 682 697 796 SCTY Units: SCTY % of New U.S. Distributed Solar Capacity % 17% 19% 25% 25% 22% 27% 32% MW Installed MW 82 107 138 177 153 189 256 One Million Customer Goal MW Deployed MW 82 107 137 176 143 177 205 MW PTO'd MW 83 79 113 138 160 156 203 Energy Contract Pricing of New Deployments (Yr. 1) $/kWh $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 Increase in Pricing Annual Escalator % 1.7% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% SREC (5-Yr. Portfolio Average) $/kWh $0.01 $0.01 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 Energy Harvest (Yr. 1) kWh/kW 1,425 1,416 1,406 1,402 1,404 1,379 1,352 Value Generation and Monetization: Asset Financing in Period (including rebates)* $/W $2.69 $2.04 $2.62 $2.28 $2.35 $2.33 $3.20 Seeking to monetize a higher % of value upfront Contracted Value of MW Deployed in Period † $/W $3.68 $3.55 $3.37 $3.24 $3.44 $3.49 $3.50 Renewal Value of MW Deployed in Period † $/W $0.38 $0.40 $0.38 $0.34 $0.33 $0.34 $0.36 Total Value of MW Deployed in Period $/W $4.06 $3.95 $3.74 $3.58 $3.77 $3.83 $3.86 Cost per Watt**: Sales $/W $0.51 $0.47 $0.49 $0.57 $0.59 $0.53 $0.64 Installation $/W $2.44 $2.28 $2.19 $2.09 $2.09 $2.13 $1.92 G&A $/W $0.30 $0.26 $0.21 $0.20 $0.27 $0.24 $0.27 Total Cost per Watt $/W $3.25 $3.01 $2.89 $2.86 $2.95 $2.91 $2.84 $2.25 $2.00 R&D Expenses $M ($1.9) ($3.0) ($4.2) ($10.0) ($12.1) ($12.4) ($17.7) Capital Expenditures $M ($4.7) ($2.9) ($5.8) ($9.5) ($30.5) ($71.6) ($45.7) Change in Working Capital Q/Q $M $28.3 $22.7 $37.0 ($38.1) ($72.3) ($31.7) ($41.7) Debt and Cash: Debt - Recourse $M ($176.6) ($349.8) ($165.2) ($149.7) ($290.6) ($419.2) ($518.2) Debt - Convertible $M ($230.0) ($230.0) ($730.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) ($796.0) Cash & Short-Term Investments $M $526.2 $429.6 $756.8 $663.6 $586.2 $497.6 $438.7 Value creation Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV Remaining of Cumulative MW Deployed (1.5) $M $2,708 Debt – Non-Recourse $M ($995) Net NPV of Cumulative MW Deployed $M $1,713 * Weighted average of Q1-Q3 2015 Asset Financing is $2.68 ** Cost per Watt is based on our quarterly cost calculation methodology we detail on our website † Updated since original report
  • 81. Appendix A: MyPower Gross Project Cash Flows 81 Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Energy Production kWh/kW 1,488 1,480 1,473 1,466 1,458 1,451 1,444 1,437 1,429 1,422 1,415 1,408 1,401 1,394 1,387 1,380 1,373 1,366 1,359 1,353 Annual Degradation (0.5%) Contract (+PBI) Price $/kWh 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.27 Annual Escalator 2.6% SREC $/kWh $0.04 $0.03 $0.03 $0.02 $0.01 Rebates/Prepayments $/W $0.04 Project Revenue $/W 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.36 O&M Expenses $/W -0.02 -0.02 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.18 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 Gross Project Cash Flow $/W 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.33 Year 21* 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Energy Production 1,346 1,339 1,332 1,326 1,319 1,313 1,306 1,299 1,293 1,287 Annual Degradation Contract (+PBI) Price 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 Annual Escalator SREC Project Revenue 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45 O&M Expenses -0.15 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 Gross Project Cash Flow 0.22 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.40 $/W UNIT ECONOMICS FOR THE 26 MW OF MYPOWER DEPLOYED IN Q3 2015: 30-Year NPV: $3.77/W  Rebates/Prepayments: $0.04/W (upfront)  Contracted NPV: $3.73/W (discounted at 6%)  Renewal NPV: $0.00/W (discounted at 6%) • Inverter replacement assumed in Year 11 at a cost of $0.15/W and in Year 21 at a Cost of $0.12/W Note: Excludes default rates †Updated since original report
  • 82. 1 FERC “Energy Infrastructure Updates” from December 2011 to December 2014 (http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports.asp) 2 GTM Research/SEIA’s “U.S Solar Market Insight Report Q2 2015” for residential and solar solar capacity and FERC “Energy Infrastructure Updates” ((http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports.asp) for all other energy capacity 3 GTM Research/SEIA’s “U.S Solar Market Insight Report Q2 2015” 4 EIA’s “2014 Utility Bundled Retail Sales” (https://www.eia.gov/electricity/sales_revenue_price/pdf/table10.pdf) 5 EIA’s “Average Price by State by Provider, 1990-2014” (http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/state) 6 Based on filings from PG&E (http://www.pge.com/nots/rates/tariffs/tm2/pdf/ELEC_4697-E.pdf), Southern California Edison (https://www.sce.com/NR/sc3/tm2/pdf/3268-E.pdf), and SDG&E (http://regarchive.sdge.com/tm2/pdf/2784-E.pdf) and assumes an additional 3% annual rate increases per year 7 GTM Research/SEIA’s “U.S Solar Market Insight Report Q2 2015” 8 Single-family housing units based on data from U.S. Census American Community Survey’s “Housing Units by Units in Structure and State” and assumes 1.0% annual growth in the housing stock per year through 2015. Excludes multi- family, mobile, and other housing units 9 U.S. Census Bureau’s “Building Permits Survey by State – Annual” (http://www.census.gov/construction/bps) 10 Commercial buildings count from EIA’s 2012 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption and commercial solar installations from GTM Research/SEIA’s “U.S. Solar Market Insight Report” 11 GTM Research – U.S. PV Leaderboard 12 Solar insolation hours based on NREL PV Watts calculator and representative cities in each country. Pricing is derived from a range of sources, including Eurostat, Climatescope, GTM Latin America Playbook, and CFE 13 Bureau of Labor Statistics Incidence rates of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by case type and ownership, selected industries, 2014 (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh_10292015.htm) 14 U.S. Census Bureau 2010. Based on the percent of the population, in states where SCTY operates, that reside in zip codes serviceable by SolarCity. Excludes NY, TX, PA and Mexico Appendix B: Footnotes - (1/1) 82
  • 83. “Asset Financing in Period” represents the aggregate project financing cash receipts in a period. This includes both tax equity investment as well as non-recourse project debt, such as our aggregation and MyPower facilities and solar asset-backed loans. Asset monetization per watt is a ratio of total Asset Monetization in the Period divided by MW Deployed in the period, and reflects only actual cash received in a period whether or not they are specifically related to the actual MW Deployed in the period. “Customers” includes all residential, commercial and government buildings where we have installed or contracted to install a solar energy system, or performed or contracted to perform an energy efficiency evaluation or other energy efficiency services. “Energy Contracts” includes all residential, commercial and government leases and power purchase agreements and consumer loan agreements pursuant to which consumers use or will use energy generated by a solar energy system that we have installed or contracted to install. For landlord-tenant structures in which we contract with the landlord or development company, we include each residence as an individual contract. For commercial customers with multiple locations, each location is deemed a contract if we maintain a separate contract for that location. “Gross Project Cash Flow” forecast represent our estimate of the sum of total cash inflows we forecast from MW Deployed in the applicable period under Energy Contracts over the 30 year expected life of the system. This includes (a) payments that our customers are obligated to pay us over the remaining term of such contracts, (b) associated performance-based incentive (PBI) payments, (c) associated solar renewable energy credits (SRECs) that we have contracted to sell, typically representing 5 years of a total potential term of 15 years, and are net of (d) estimated operations and maintenance, insurance, administrative and inverter replacement costs, based on contractually agreed amounts as well as historic and forecasted expenses. Operations and maintenance, insurance, and administrative costs reflect our operating expenses in our funds, or are estimated at $0.021 per watt and assumed to grow at a 2.5% inflation rate per year, and inverter replacement unit costs are estimated to decline at a (2.5%) rate per year, implying $0.15 per watt in Year 11 and $0.12 per watt in Year 21. Energy production is estimated to degrade at 0.5% per year. For our MyPower Energy Contracts, we use the expected cash flows over the full term of the 30-year contract, and for lease and PPA Energy Contracts with terms less than 30 years, we assume the contracts are renewed at a contract price equal to 90% of the contractual price in effect at expiration of the initial term through the remainder of the expected 30-year system life. “MW” or “megawatts” represents the DC nameplate megawatt production capacity. “MW Booked” represents the aggregate megawatt production capacity of solar energy systems pursuant to customer contracts signed (with no contingencies remaining) during the applicable period net of cancellations during the applicable period. This metric includes solar energy systems booked under Energy Contracts as well as for solar energy system direct sales. “MW Deployed” represents the megawatt production capacity of solar energy systems that have had all required building department inspections completed during the applicable period. This metric includes solar energy systems deployed under Energy Contracts as well as for solar energy system direct sales. Appendix C – Definitions (1/2) 83
  • 84. “MW Installed” represents the megawatt production capacity of solar energy systems, for which (i) all solar panels, inverters, mounting and racking hardware, and system wiring have been installed, (ii) the system inverter is connected and a successful DC string test has been completed confirming the production capacity of the system, and (iii) the system is capable of being grid connected (including pending a utility disconnect procedure), the latest of which is completed during the applicable period. This metric includes solar energy systems deployed under Energy Contracts as well as for solar energy system direct sales. In each case in-period completion of the above criteria may be demonstrated by written verification by each of the Chief Financial Officer and the President (which may include written sub-certifications). “MW PTO’d” represents the megawatt production capacity of solar energy systems that have had all required building department inspections completed by the authority having jurisdiction and subsequently interconnected to the utility grid. “Pre-Tax NPV” represents the net present value at a 6% discount rate of the Levered Project Cash forecast. It includes both the debt proceeds and total debt service including full principal repayment for both (a) actual Aggregation Facility debt drawn down (or expected to be drawn down) and (b) our forecast for Solar Asset-Backed Loans for the underlying MW Deployed in the period. This includes both “Contracted Levered NPV,” which represents the net present value of Levered Project Cash Flow under contract as well as “Renewal Levered NPV,” which represents the net present value of Levered Project Cash Flow forecast from renewal. “Unlevered Project Cash Flow” represents our forecast of Gross Project Cash Flows after both Tax Equity Investment and Tax Equity Lease/PPA Distributions. “Tax equity Investment” represents the total expected investment from our tax equity funds investors in our lease and PPA Energy Contracts. “Tax Equity Lease/PPA Distributions” are based on the terms of the agreements we have in place with our tax equity investment partners for the MW Deployed in the applicable period under lease and PPA Energy Contracts. We do not use tax equity investment for our MyPower product. For tax equity investment in our lease and PPA Energy Contracts, our investment partners share in a portion of the Gross Project Cash Flow forecast received over the term of the agreement. Our estimate is not inclusive of any potential buy-out of our tax equity partners’ interests in the project after Year 20. “Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV” represents the net present value at a 6% discount rate of the Unlevered Project Cash forecast. It includes (a) the Tax Equity Investment as well as the Gross Project Cash Flows after Tax Equity Lease/PPA Distributions. This includes both “Contracted Unlevered NPV,” which represents the net present value of Unlevered Project Cash Flow under contract as well as “Renewal Unlevered NPV,” which represents the net present value of Unlevered Project Cash Flow forecast from renewal of our lease/PPA contracts. “Value of MW Deployed” represents the Unlevered Pre-Tax NPV of MW Deployed under an Energy Contract during a specified period. “Levered Project Cash Flow” represents our forecast of Unlevered Project Cash Flows after non-recourse debt service. Debt service includes both (a) Aggregation Facility debt for the first two years, based on the terms of our current facility, as well as (b) Solar Asset-Backed Loans, which we assume we issue at the end of year two to refinance the Aggregation Facility debt. We base the interest rate on the average of all four of our previous issuances and assume principal repayment over an 18-year term. Appendix C – Definitions (2/2) 84