Distance Metric Based Multi-Attribute Seismic Facies Classification to Identi...Pioneer Natural Resources
Conventional reservoirs benefit from a long scientific history that correlates successful plays to seismic measurements through depositional, tectonic, and digenetic models. Unconventional reservoirs are less well understood, however benefit from significantly denser well control. Thus, allowing us to establish statistical rather than model-based correlations between seismic data, geology, and successful completion strategies. One of the more commonly encountered correlation techniques is based on computer assisted pattern recognition. The pattern recognition techniques have found their niche in a plethora of applications ranging from flagging suspicious credit card purchase patterns to rewarding repeating online buying patterns. Classification of a given seismic response as having a “good” or “bad” pattern requires a “distance metric”. Distance metric “learning” uses past experiences (well performance) as training data to develop a distance metric. Alternative distance metrics have demonstrated significant value in the identification and classification of repeated or anomalous behaviors in public health, security, and marketing. In this paper we examine the value of three of these alternative distance metrics of 3D seismic attributes to the identification of sweet spots in a Barnett Shale play.
Definition and classification of (online) distance educationMarie Tessier
Defining and classifying of online distance education (MOOC, SPOC, SMOC, SOOC). Overview of the history of distance education. Analyzing the ideal target group for online training. Difference between xMOOCs and cMOOCs (connectivist MOOCs). SWOT analysis of higher education and academia. Core Challenges of Higher Education (Kaplan’s Three E’s for Education - Enhance, Embrace, Expand). Kaplan Andreas, Haenlein M. (2016) Higher Education and the Digital Revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, Social Media and the Cookie Monster, Business Horizons, 59(4), 441-450.
Distance Metric Based Multi-Attribute Seismic Facies Classification to Identi...Pioneer Natural Resources
Conventional reservoirs benefit from a long scientific history that correlates successful plays to seismic measurements through depositional, tectonic, and digenetic models. Unconventional reservoirs are less well understood, however benefit from significantly denser well control. Thus, allowing us to establish statistical rather than model-based correlations between seismic data, geology, and successful completion strategies. One of the more commonly encountered correlation techniques is based on computer assisted pattern recognition. The pattern recognition techniques have found their niche in a plethora of applications ranging from flagging suspicious credit card purchase patterns to rewarding repeating online buying patterns. Classification of a given seismic response as having a “good” or “bad” pattern requires a “distance metric”. Distance metric “learning” uses past experiences (well performance) as training data to develop a distance metric. Alternative distance metrics have demonstrated significant value in the identification and classification of repeated or anomalous behaviors in public health, security, and marketing. In this paper we examine the value of three of these alternative distance metrics of 3D seismic attributes to the identification of sweet spots in a Barnett Shale play.
Definition and classification of (online) distance educationMarie Tessier
Defining and classifying of online distance education (MOOC, SPOC, SMOC, SOOC). Overview of the history of distance education. Analyzing the ideal target group for online training. Difference between xMOOCs and cMOOCs (connectivist MOOCs). SWOT analysis of higher education and academia. Core Challenges of Higher Education (Kaplan’s Three E’s for Education - Enhance, Embrace, Expand). Kaplan Andreas, Haenlein M. (2016) Higher Education and the Digital Revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, Social Media and the Cookie Monster, Business Horizons, 59(4), 441-450.
2. Classical shape analysis methods
• Circularity: • Irregularity:
The degree of circularity is how much this Measurement of the irregu- larity of a solid. It
polygon is similar to a circle. Where 1 is a is calculated based on its perimeter and the
perfect circle and 0.492 is an isosceles perimeter of the sur- rounding circle. The
triangle. minimum irregularity is a circle, corresponding
at the value 1. A square is the maximum
4p s s: object area irregularity with a value of 1.402.
C=
p2 p: object perimeter
pc
I=
• Quadrature: p
The degree of quadrature of a solid,
where 1 is a square and 0.800 an isosceles • Elongation:
triangle. The degree of ellipticity of a solid, where a
circle and a square are the less elliptic shape.
p
Q= D
4 s E=
d
D: maximum diameter within an object
d: minimum diameter perpendicular at D
3. The Workflow of Morphometric Analysis for Shape
Original Shape
Distance Matrix
(Polygon)
Fourier Transform Test the number of Clustering
Inverse Fourier Transform Clustering by PAM
Approximate Shape
Assign Class info to each object
(Polygon)
Procrustes Analysis Visualize on Geo-space
4. Fourier descriptors of closed polygons
Fourier transform enables to represent any periodic function with indefinite summation of
trigonometric function, which terms Fourier descriptors. Because polygon shape could be
denote as periodic function when decomposed into X and Y axis, this method could be
applicable to polygons.
X axsis
139.7110
35.5465
1 ¥ 2p nt 2p nt
f( x ) = + å an cos + bn sin
2 n=1 L L
139.7106
t(i)
139.7102
139.7098
35.5460
0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005
org_58[,2]
t(xi, yi) t
Y axsis
35.5465
1 ¥ 2p nt 2p nt
g( y) = + å an cos + bn sin
2 n=1 L L
35.5455
35.5460
t(i)
35.5455
139.7098 139.7100 139.7102 139.7104 139.7106 139.7108 139.7110 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005
org_58[,1] t
6. Simplifying with approximate Shape
By configuring higher number of harmonics
and of approximate points, shapes would be
more approximate to original shapes.
7. Inverse Fourier Transform
Original polygons can be approximately Original Shape
First Approximate Ellipse
reconstruct. To reconstruct original
35.5465
Approximate Shape
t(x’j, y’j)
shapes, number of points should be
specified, and each point is arranged on
constant degree apart in a circle.
35.5460
Approximate with 10 points
org_58[,2]
1.0
1
0.5
35.5455
0.0
0
y
-1 0 1
-0.5
-1.0
-1
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
x 139.7098 139.7100 139.7102 139.7104 139.7106 139.7108 139.7110
org_58[,1]
H
ì æ j × 2p × i ö æ j × 2p × i öü
x ' j = åí ai × cos ç ÷ + bi × sin ç ÷ý + cx
i=2 î è L ø è L øþ
H
ì æ j × 2p × i ö æ j × 2p × i öü
y'i = åíci × cos ç ÷ + di × sin ç ÷ý + cy
i=2 î è L ø è L øþ
8. Proclustes Analysis
The aim is to obtain a similar placement
and size between two shapes, by
minimizing a measure of shape Find an optimum angle of rotation θ that the
difference called the Procrustes distance sum of the squared distances between
between the objects. To conduct this corresponding points is minimized.
å
n
analysis, number of control points in ui yi - wi xi
each shape should be same. q = tan -1 i=1
å
n
i=1
ui xi - wi yi
Calculate root mean square distance for Then, optimum coordinates are assigned by
uniform scaling following fomula.
å ( x - x ) + ( y - y)
n 2 2
s= i=1 i i (hi, n i ) = ( cosqui -sinqwi,sinqui +sinqwi )
n
Dissimilarity between two shapes are
Translate & uniform scaling
measured as squared distance.
xi - x yi - y
(ui, wi ) = , d= åi=1(hi - xi ) + (n i - yi )
n 2 2
S S
10. Partition Around Medoids (PAM)
Partition Around Medoids(PAM) is a clustering algorithm which attempt to minimize
squared error as well as the k-means. In contrast to k-means, PAM chooses existing points
as centers, terms medoids, and the algorithm is more robust to noise and outliers as
compared to k-means. Silhouette plot of pam(x = tokyo.dist^2, k = 5)
k n = 4373 5 clusters Cj
argmin å å x j - mi
j : nj | aveiÎCj si
1 : 1388 | 0.62
i=1 x j 'Si
Where mi is the medoid of Si.
2 : 740 | 0.41
$classinfo (output of PAM clustering) 3 : 1070 | 0.44
size max_diss av_diss diameter separation
[1,] 1388 65.804 18.27153 193.8786 0.2096066
4 : 693 | 0.41
[2,] 740 239.5017 29.9133 463.227 0.1864726
[3,] 1070 200.8129 31.75182 429.5183 0.2096066
5 : 482 | 0.35
[4,] 693 737.1965 30.68781 1044.5552 0.1864726
[5,] 482 460.6608 46.2136 803.3625 0.3181256
・ ・ ・ ・ ・ -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
・ ・ ・ ・ ・ Silhouette width si
・ ・ ・ ・ ・ Average silhouette width : 0.48
11. Silhouette Width - Test the number of clustering -
For each datum i, average dissimilarity distance C k-=4
within the same class is calculated At first.
å
1
a(i) = (a(i) - a j )2 B
n(k ) a(i) ,a j 'Ki
i
D
Calculate the lowest averaged dissimilarity to
datum j of any other cluster as following.
æ ö
b(i) = argmin ç 1 å (a - b )2 ÷ A
ç n b 'K (i ) j
÷
K
è (k j ) j j ø
The index of clustering efficiency at datum i The index of clustering efficiency at each
is calculated as silhouette width. cluster k is average silhouette width.
a(i) - b(i)
å S(i) (-1 £ Sk £1)
1
S(i) = (-1 £ S(i) £1) Sk =
{
max a(i) , b(i) } n(k j ) S(i) 'Ki
12. Average Silhouette Width
The highest average width = 5
Average Silhouette Width Silhouette Width N=50
Averaged with PAM from 2 to 50 clusters
0.48
ì
ï 1- a(i)
ï
0.46
b(i ) if (a(i) > b(i) )
ï
ï
S(i) = í 0 if (a(i) = b(i) )
ï
0.44
b(i ) if (a(i) < b(i) )
res$sil
ï
ï a(i) -1
ï
0.42
î
0.40
0 10 20 30 40 50
Index
Averaged silhouette width suggests that the number of cluster = 5