This document contains financial statements for Verizon Communications Inc. for the years 2015-2017, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. The balance sheet shows the company had total assets of $257.1 billion in 2017. The income statement indicates operating revenues were $126 billion in 2017 with net income of $3.1 billion. The cash flow statement reveals the company had net cash from operating activities of $25.3 billion in 2017 and spent $1.7 billion on capital expenditures.
2015 Balance SheetPeriod Ending12/31/15AssetsCurrent AssetsCash And Cash Equivalents2,459,000Short Term Investments88,000Net Receivables13,108,000RatioInventory14,001,000Other Current Assets722,000201520142013Total Current Assets 30,378,000Current Ratio1.31Long Term Investments- 0Debt / Equity Ratio1.52Property Plant and Equipment9,855,000Free Cash FlowGoodwill38,106,000Earnings per ShareIntangible Assets13,878,000Price / earnings ratioAccumulated Amortization- 0Return on Equity14.1%Other Assets1,440,000Net profit margin Deferred Long Term Asset Charges- Total Assets 93,657,000Shares Outstanding1,101,000,0001,140,000,0001,180,000,000LiabilitiesClosing Price Dec. 31 97.7796.3171.57Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable14,319,000Short/Current Long Term Debt8,850,000Other Current Liabilities- 0Total Current Liabilities 23,169,000Long Term Debt26,267,000Other Liabilities1,542,000Deferred Long Term Liability Charges5,437,000Minority Interest7,000Negative Goodwill- Total Liabilities 56,422,000Stockholders' EquityMisc Stocks Options Warrants39,000Redeemable Preferred Stock- 0Preferred Stock- 0Common Stock17,000Retained Earnings35,506,000Treasury Stock(28,886,000)Capital Surplus30,948,000Other Stockholder Equity(389,000)Total Stockholder Equity 37,235,000Net Tangible Assets (14,788,000)http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=CVS&annual
Works Cited
CVS Balance Sheet | CVS Health Corporation Common S Stock - Yahoo! Finance. (n.d.). Retrieved February 28, 2016, from http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=CVS
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=CVS&annual
2014 Balance SheetPeriod Ending12/31/14AssetsCurrent AssetsCash And Cash Equivalents2,481,000Short Term Investments34,000Net Receivables10,672,000RatioInventory11,930,000Other Current Assets866,000201520142013Total Current Assets 25,983,000Current Ratio1.37Long Term Investments- 0Debt / Equity Ratio0.95Property Plant and Equipment8,843,000Free Cash FlowGoodwill28,142,000Earnings per ShareIntangible Assets9,774,000Price / earnings ratioAccumulated Amortization- 0Return on Equity12.2%Other Assets1,445,000Net profit margin Deferred Long Term Asset Charges- Total Assets 74,187,000Shares Outstanding1,101,000,0001,140,000,0001,180,000,000LiabilitiesClosing Price Dec. 31 97.7796.3171.57Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable12,363,000Short/Current Long Term Debt6,664,000Other Current Liabilities- 0Total Current Liabilities 19,027,000Long Term Debt11,630,000Other Liabilities1,531,000Deferred Long Term Liability Charges4,036,000Minority Interest5,000Negative Goodwill- Total Liabilities 36,229,000Stockholders' EquityMisc Stocks Options Warrants- 0Redeemable Preferred Stock- 0Preferred Stock- 0Common Stock17,000Retained Earnings31,849,000Treasury Stock(24,078,000)Capital Surplus30,418,000Other Stockholder Equity(248,000)Total Stockholder Equity 37,958,000Net Tangible Assets 42,000http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=CVS&annual
Works Cited
CVS Balance Sheet | CVS Health Corporation Common S Stock - Yahoo! Finance. (n.d.). Retrieved February ...
Question 3Q=50,000 - (25 * P)FC=2,750,000VC=200/unitTC=FC+VCTVC=VC/unit * # of Units ProducedTC=$2,750,000 + 200QQ=50,000 - (25 * P)25P=50,000-QP=(50,000/25) - (1Q/25)P=2000 - 0.04QTR=P * QTR=(2000 - 0.04Q) * QTR=2000Q-0.04Q2MR=dTR=2000 - 0.08QdQMC=dTC=200dQMR = MC at profit maximizing levelQ2000 - 0.08Q = 200Q0.08Q = 2000 - 200Q0.08Q = 1800Q1800/0.08 = 25,500Q=25,500P=2000 - 0.04QP=2000 - 0.04 (22,500)P=2000 - 900P=$1,100AC=TC/QTC=$2,750,000 + 200 (22,500)TC=$2,750,000 + 4,500,000TC=7,250,000AC=MCAC=$200Profit=TR - TCTR=P * QTR=$1,100 * 22,500TR=24,750,000.00Profit=24,750,000 - 7,250,000Profit=17,500,000====
Question 4Impacts of the ransactions on the major financial statementsStatement of cash flowsCash flows from operating activitiesRevenuesDiscount on goods$ (800,000.00)Total operating cash inflowsCash flows from investing activitiesIncrease in the value ofProperty, Plant, and Equipment$ 2,100,000.00Net flow from other non operating activitiesDecrease in accounts receivable$ (1,500,000.00)Total cash flows $ (200,000.00)Income statementRevenues$ (800,000.00)ExpensesBad debt expense$ 1,500,000.00Gross profit$ (2,300,000.00)Add: Income from non-operating activities$ 2,100,000.00Net income$ (200,000.00)Balance sheetsCurrent assetsLiabilities and stockholders equityCash$ 2,100,000.00Dividends & retained earnings$ 2,100,000.00$ (800,000.00)Less:$ (1,500,000.00)Net change in cash$ 1,300,000.00$ (800,000.00)Accounts receivable$ (1,500,000.00)Change in the Total assets$ (200,000.00)Change in stockholders equity$ (200,000.00)A write-off of an Accounts Receivable amount of $1.5 millionThis reduces the accounts receivable in the balance sheet by $1.5 million.In the income statement, the operating expense (bad debts expense increases by $1.5 million) thus decreasing the net income by the same amount.In the statement of cash flows, the change in the accounts receivable decreases by $1. millionProperty, Plant, and Equipment asset valued at $5 million for cash, which generated a profit of $2.1 million.Cash flow from the sale of property, plant and equipmet increases in the statement of cash flows by $2.1 millionIncome from non operating activities increases by $2.1 million Cash in the balance sheet will increase by $2.1 millionIPS gave a 10% discount to a customerThe revenues in the income statement will decrease by $0.8 millionCash in the balance sheet statement will decrease by $0.8 millionIn the statement of cash flows, the net income will decrease by $0.8 million
AMD Income StatementConsolidated Statements of Operations - USD ($) shares in Millions, $ in Millions12 Months EndedDec. 31, 2016Dec. 26, 2015Dec. 27, 2014Income Statement [Abstract]Net revenue$4,272$3,991$5,506Cost of sales3,2742,9113,667Gross margin9981,0801,839Research and development1,0089471,072Marketing, general and administrative460482604Amortization of acquired intangible assets0314Restructuring and other special charges, net-1012971Licensing gain- ...
2015 Balance SheetPeriod Ending12/31/15AssetsCurrent AssetsCash And Cash Equivalents2,459,000Short Term Investments88,000Net Receivables13,108,000RatioInventory14,001,000Other Current Assets722,000201520142013Total Current Assets 30,378,000Current Ratio1.31Long Term Investments- 0Debt / Equity Ratio1.52Property Plant and Equipment9,855,000Free Cash FlowGoodwill38,106,000Earnings per ShareIntangible Assets13,878,000Price / earnings ratioAccumulated Amortization- 0Return on Equity14.1%Other Assets1,440,000Net profit margin Deferred Long Term Asset Charges- Total Assets 93,657,000Shares Outstanding1,101,000,0001,140,000,0001,180,000,000LiabilitiesClosing Price Dec. 31 97.7796.3171.57Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable14,319,000Short/Current Long Term Debt8,850,000Other Current Liabilities- 0Total Current Liabilities 23,169,000Long Term Debt26,267,000Other Liabilities1,542,000Deferred Long Term Liability Charges5,437,000Minority Interest7,000Negative Goodwill- Total Liabilities 56,422,000Stockholders' EquityMisc Stocks Options Warrants39,000Redeemable Preferred Stock- 0Preferred Stock- 0Common Stock17,000Retained Earnings35,506,000Treasury Stock(28,886,000)Capital Surplus30,948,000Other Stockholder Equity(389,000)Total Stockholder Equity 37,235,000Net Tangible Assets (14,788,000)http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=CVS&annual
Works Cited
CVS Balance Sheet | CVS Health Corporation Common S Stock - Yahoo! Finance. (n.d.). Retrieved February 28, 2016, from http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=CVS
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=CVS&annual
2014 Balance SheetPeriod Ending12/31/14AssetsCurrent AssetsCash And Cash Equivalents2,481,000Short Term Investments34,000Net Receivables10,672,000RatioInventory11,930,000Other Current Assets866,000201520142013Total Current Assets 25,983,000Current Ratio1.37Long Term Investments- 0Debt / Equity Ratio0.95Property Plant and Equipment8,843,000Free Cash FlowGoodwill28,142,000Earnings per ShareIntangible Assets9,774,000Price / earnings ratioAccumulated Amortization- 0Return on Equity12.2%Other Assets1,445,000Net profit margin Deferred Long Term Asset Charges- Total Assets 74,187,000Shares Outstanding1,101,000,0001,140,000,0001,180,000,000LiabilitiesClosing Price Dec. 31 97.7796.3171.57Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable12,363,000Short/Current Long Term Debt6,664,000Other Current Liabilities- 0Total Current Liabilities 19,027,000Long Term Debt11,630,000Other Liabilities1,531,000Deferred Long Term Liability Charges4,036,000Minority Interest5,000Negative Goodwill- Total Liabilities 36,229,000Stockholders' EquityMisc Stocks Options Warrants- 0Redeemable Preferred Stock- 0Preferred Stock- 0Common Stock17,000Retained Earnings31,849,000Treasury Stock(24,078,000)Capital Surplus30,418,000Other Stockholder Equity(248,000)Total Stockholder Equity 37,958,000Net Tangible Assets 42,000http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=CVS&annual
Works Cited
CVS Balance Sheet | CVS Health Corporation Common S Stock - Yahoo! Finance. (n.d.). Retrieved February ...
Question 3Q=50,000 - (25 * P)FC=2,750,000VC=200/unitTC=FC+VCTVC=VC/unit * # of Units ProducedTC=$2,750,000 + 200QQ=50,000 - (25 * P)25P=50,000-QP=(50,000/25) - (1Q/25)P=2000 - 0.04QTR=P * QTR=(2000 - 0.04Q) * QTR=2000Q-0.04Q2MR=dTR=2000 - 0.08QdQMC=dTC=200dQMR = MC at profit maximizing levelQ2000 - 0.08Q = 200Q0.08Q = 2000 - 200Q0.08Q = 1800Q1800/0.08 = 25,500Q=25,500P=2000 - 0.04QP=2000 - 0.04 (22,500)P=2000 - 900P=$1,100AC=TC/QTC=$2,750,000 + 200 (22,500)TC=$2,750,000 + 4,500,000TC=7,250,000AC=MCAC=$200Profit=TR - TCTR=P * QTR=$1,100 * 22,500TR=24,750,000.00Profit=24,750,000 - 7,250,000Profit=17,500,000====
Question 4Impacts of the ransactions on the major financial statementsStatement of cash flowsCash flows from operating activitiesRevenuesDiscount on goods$ (800,000.00)Total operating cash inflowsCash flows from investing activitiesIncrease in the value ofProperty, Plant, and Equipment$ 2,100,000.00Net flow from other non operating activitiesDecrease in accounts receivable$ (1,500,000.00)Total cash flows $ (200,000.00)Income statementRevenues$ (800,000.00)ExpensesBad debt expense$ 1,500,000.00Gross profit$ (2,300,000.00)Add: Income from non-operating activities$ 2,100,000.00Net income$ (200,000.00)Balance sheetsCurrent assetsLiabilities and stockholders equityCash$ 2,100,000.00Dividends & retained earnings$ 2,100,000.00$ (800,000.00)Less:$ (1,500,000.00)Net change in cash$ 1,300,000.00$ (800,000.00)Accounts receivable$ (1,500,000.00)Change in the Total assets$ (200,000.00)Change in stockholders equity$ (200,000.00)A write-off of an Accounts Receivable amount of $1.5 millionThis reduces the accounts receivable in the balance sheet by $1.5 million.In the income statement, the operating expense (bad debts expense increases by $1.5 million) thus decreasing the net income by the same amount.In the statement of cash flows, the change in the accounts receivable decreases by $1. millionProperty, Plant, and Equipment asset valued at $5 million for cash, which generated a profit of $2.1 million.Cash flow from the sale of property, plant and equipmet increases in the statement of cash flows by $2.1 millionIncome from non operating activities increases by $2.1 million Cash in the balance sheet will increase by $2.1 millionIPS gave a 10% discount to a customerThe revenues in the income statement will decrease by $0.8 millionCash in the balance sheet statement will decrease by $0.8 millionIn the statement of cash flows, the net income will decrease by $0.8 million
AMD Income StatementConsolidated Statements of Operations - USD ($) shares in Millions, $ in Millions12 Months EndedDec. 31, 2016Dec. 26, 2015Dec. 27, 2014Income Statement [Abstract]Net revenue$4,272$3,991$5,506Cost of sales3,2742,9113,667Gross margin9981,0801,839Research and development1,0089471,072Marketing, general and administrative460482604Amortization of acquired intangible assets0314Restructuring and other special charges, net-1012971Licensing gain- ...
1.
Prepare and analize the common statement for Anandam Manufacturing Company. Show all
calculations.
2.
Prepare and analize the cash flow statement for Anandam Manufacturing Company. Show all
calculations.
3.
Calculate the ratios based on case Exhibit 3. Show all calculations. Based on financial analysis
of financial statements, would a loan officer grant a loan to Anandam financial company?
EXHIBIT 3: INDUSTRY AVERAGE OF KEY RATIos Sector Average Ratio 2:301 Current
ratio Acid test ratio (quick ratio) 120 Receivable tunover ratioimes turnover 52 days Receivable
days Inventory turmover ratio Inventory days Long-term detttototal debt Debt-to-equity ratio
Gross profit rato Net profit ratio Retun on equity Retum on total assets 4.85 times 75 days 24%
35% 40% 18% 22% 10% Total asset turnover ratio Ti Fixed asset turnover ratio Current asset
tunover ratio3 interest coverage ratio (tmes 10 nterest earned Warking captal smover ratio Retu
on ed sset
Solution
1….Common -size Income statement 2012-13 % to Total sales 2013-14 % to Total sales
2014-15 % to Total sales Analysis of % to Total sales proportion Sales Cash 200 10.00%
480 10.00% 800 10.00% Credit 1800 90.00% 4320 90.00% 7200 90.00% Total Sales 2000
100.00% 4800 100.00% 8000 100.00% COGS 1240 62.00% 2832 59.00% 4800 60.00%
COGS has reduced in the last 2 yrs. Gross profit 760 38.00% 1968 41.00% 3200 40.00% so,
G/P has increased Operating Expenses: Gen.adm.& sell.exp. 80 4.00% 450 9.38% 1000
12.50% % to sales has doubled in 2013-14 & increased by more than 25% in 2014-15
Depreciation 100 5.00% 400 8.33% 660 8.25% Has increased by 3% in the last 2 yrs.
Int.exp.(on borrowings) 60 3.00% 158 3.29% 340 4.25% Has slightly increased in 2014-15
Profit before tax(PBT) 520 26.00% 960 20.00% 1200 15.00% PBT% has reduced gradually in
both the yrs.due to increase in all operating expenses esp.gen admn.& sell exp. Tax at 30% 156
7.80% 288 6.00% 360 4.50% Decrease % due to decrease in profit % Profit after tax(PAT) 364
18.20% 672 14.00% 840 10.50% PAT% has reduced gradually in both the yrs.due to increase in
all operating expenses esp.gen admn.& sell exp. Common-size Balance
Sheet Assets % to Total % to Total % to Total Fixed assets(net of dep) 1900 74.22%
2500 44.64% 4700 51.33% Assets have decreased to the total Current assets Cash & Cash
equivalents 40 1.56% 100 1.79% 106 1.16% Slight variation in ratio to total Accounts
Receivables 300 11.72% 1500 26.79% 2100 22.94% Has increased in 2013-14 & again
decreased in 2014-15 Inventories 320 12.50% 1500 26.79% 2250 24.57% Has increased in
2013-14 & again decreased in 2014-15 Total 2560 100.00% 5600 100.00% 9156 100.00%
Equity & Liabilities Equity share capital($ 10) 1200 46.88% 1600 28.57% 2000 21.84%
Decreased steadily in all the 2 yrs. Reserves & surplus 364 14.22% 1036 18.50% 1876 20.49%
Increased steadily in both 2 yrs.due to increase in $ net income in those yrs. Long-term
borrowings 736 28.75% 1236 22.07% 2500 27.30% Decreased in 2013-14 & again increased i.
The key fact to grasp is that the cost of capital associated with an investment depends on the risk of that investment.
Thus, the cost of capital for a risk-free investment is the risk-free rate.
The cost of capital for a risky project, is greater than the risk-free rate, and the appropriate discount rate would exceed the risk-free rate.
We will henceforth use the terms required return, appropriate discount rate , and cost of capital more or less interchangeably because they all mean essentially the same thing.
It is a common error to forget this crucial point and fall into the trap of thinking that the cost of capital for an investment depends primarily on how and where the capital is raised.
Ipotesi di massimizzazione del valore di mercato di un’azienda quotata: i managers scelgono le opzioni di investimento e finanziamento che ritengono massimizzino il valore di mercato dell’azienda
Il valore di un’azienda è pari al valore scontato degli utili attesi futuri generati dagli assets posseduti, più il valore presente netto delle nuove opportunità di investimento che coinvolgano nuove spese in conto capitale
Per opportunità d’investimento si intende investire in progetti che hanno un rendimento maggiore a quello del mercato VPN positivo
Se una azienda ha progetti con VPN positivo e annuncia nuove spese in conto capitale (CAPEX) è molto probabile che accresca il suo valore di mercato
Sheet1Rate your skills using the following scaleChapter 1 You Ma.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Rate your skills using the following scale:Chapter 1: You Make A DifferenceChapter 2: Credibility is the Foundation of Leadership1= Strongly Disagree4= AgreeQuestionScoreQuestionScore2= Disagree5= Strongly Agree20403= Partly Agree20090230140Total0Total01. Balance focusing on the future with an understanding of the present and events from the past.Chapter 3: Values Drive CommitmentChapter 4: Focusing on the Future Sets Leaders Apart2. Maintain self-awareness in external challenges or unexpected events.QuestionScoreQuestionScore70103. Support others in achieving their objectives through regular one-on-one meetings.1101502601604. Take time regularly to get updated on current events.Total0Total05. In conversation, provide undivided attention, show interest, and suspend judgment.Chapter 5: You Can’t Do It AloneChapter 6: Trust RulesQuestionScore6. Forthright and candid in all situations with all people.30QuestionScore170607. Show respect when questioning the ideas and opinions of others.250210Total02708. Take actions that create forward momentum.Total09. Attend industry functions and trade shows on a regular basis.Chapter 7: Challenge is the Crucible for GreatnessChapter 8: You Either Lead by Example or Don’t Lead At AllQuestionScoreQuestionScore10. Explore, identify, and define the nature, cause, and implications of problems.8013010018011. Demonstrate consistency between expressed beliefs, values, and actions.280240Total0Total012. Continuously give and receive feedback on results of learning efforts.13. Assess which role is most appropriate for the person and situation.Chapter 9: The Best Leaders Are The Best LearnersChapter 10: Leadership is an Affair of the HeartQuestionScoreQuestionScore14. Possess an understanding of business operations (budgeting, marketing, sales, etc.).1205019022030029015. Manage time in a way that balances personal and professional objectives.Total0Total016. Focus on actual results of a process or plan.17. Build relationships and ask questions to support a variety of initiatives.The totals from each chapter will show you your score.Refer to the range of scores to identify what type of further action you should take.18. Demonstrate an understanding of living and leading by example.3-6: Taking immediate action to improve your results is suggested.7-12: Develop action plans to be implemented over the next month.19. Identify and develop skills and effective behavior in others.13-15: You are performing well as a leader. Pinpoint areas to optimize your performance.20. Possess technical competencies to achieve relevant goals and objectives.21. Consistently and clearly communicates the desired results of a process or plan.22. Align people’s visions, values, goals, and action plans with bigger picture.23. Possess an understanding of industry trends.24. Identify and change self-defeating behaviors.25. Explore readiness to change and move ahead by knowing the stages of group development.26. Know what I value an.
Sheet1Quarter Sales PersonRegionQuarterly Sales31-MarSmithEast$75031-MarWilliamsEast$80031-MarJonesSouth$76531-MarWhiteWest$45631-MarJohnsonNorth$98731-MarTaylorWest$44331-MarYoungSouth$36831-MarHallEast$15930-JunSmithEast$1,20030-JunWilliamsEast$36930-JunJonesSouth$98030-JunWhiteWest$65030-JunJohnsonNorth$76030-JunTaylorWest$27830-JunYoungSouth$78030-JunHallEast$54730-SepSmithEast$69830-SepWilliamsEast$46730-SepJonesSouth$98330-SepWhiteWest$23730-SepJohnsonNorth$46930-SepTaylorWest$74030-SepYoungSouth$74930-SepHallEast$345
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6501_Week4_Discussion_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no .
More Related Content
Similar to Sheet 2015-2017 Balance SheetSheet 2015-2017 Income Statement.docx
1.
Prepare and analize the common statement for Anandam Manufacturing Company. Show all
calculations.
2.
Prepare and analize the cash flow statement for Anandam Manufacturing Company. Show all
calculations.
3.
Calculate the ratios based on case Exhibit 3. Show all calculations. Based on financial analysis
of financial statements, would a loan officer grant a loan to Anandam financial company?
EXHIBIT 3: INDUSTRY AVERAGE OF KEY RATIos Sector Average Ratio 2:301 Current
ratio Acid test ratio (quick ratio) 120 Receivable tunover ratioimes turnover 52 days Receivable
days Inventory turmover ratio Inventory days Long-term detttototal debt Debt-to-equity ratio
Gross profit rato Net profit ratio Retun on equity Retum on total assets 4.85 times 75 days 24%
35% 40% 18% 22% 10% Total asset turnover ratio Ti Fixed asset turnover ratio Current asset
tunover ratio3 interest coverage ratio (tmes 10 nterest earned Warking captal smover ratio Retu
on ed sset
Solution
1….Common -size Income statement 2012-13 % to Total sales 2013-14 % to Total sales
2014-15 % to Total sales Analysis of % to Total sales proportion Sales Cash 200 10.00%
480 10.00% 800 10.00% Credit 1800 90.00% 4320 90.00% 7200 90.00% Total Sales 2000
100.00% 4800 100.00% 8000 100.00% COGS 1240 62.00% 2832 59.00% 4800 60.00%
COGS has reduced in the last 2 yrs. Gross profit 760 38.00% 1968 41.00% 3200 40.00% so,
G/P has increased Operating Expenses: Gen.adm.& sell.exp. 80 4.00% 450 9.38% 1000
12.50% % to sales has doubled in 2013-14 & increased by more than 25% in 2014-15
Depreciation 100 5.00% 400 8.33% 660 8.25% Has increased by 3% in the last 2 yrs.
Int.exp.(on borrowings) 60 3.00% 158 3.29% 340 4.25% Has slightly increased in 2014-15
Profit before tax(PBT) 520 26.00% 960 20.00% 1200 15.00% PBT% has reduced gradually in
both the yrs.due to increase in all operating expenses esp.gen admn.& sell exp. Tax at 30% 156
7.80% 288 6.00% 360 4.50% Decrease % due to decrease in profit % Profit after tax(PAT) 364
18.20% 672 14.00% 840 10.50% PAT% has reduced gradually in both the yrs.due to increase in
all operating expenses esp.gen admn.& sell exp. Common-size Balance
Sheet Assets % to Total % to Total % to Total Fixed assets(net of dep) 1900 74.22%
2500 44.64% 4700 51.33% Assets have decreased to the total Current assets Cash & Cash
equivalents 40 1.56% 100 1.79% 106 1.16% Slight variation in ratio to total Accounts
Receivables 300 11.72% 1500 26.79% 2100 22.94% Has increased in 2013-14 & again
decreased in 2014-15 Inventories 320 12.50% 1500 26.79% 2250 24.57% Has increased in
2013-14 & again decreased in 2014-15 Total 2560 100.00% 5600 100.00% 9156 100.00%
Equity & Liabilities Equity share capital($ 10) 1200 46.88% 1600 28.57% 2000 21.84%
Decreased steadily in all the 2 yrs. Reserves & surplus 364 14.22% 1036 18.50% 1876 20.49%
Increased steadily in both 2 yrs.due to increase in $ net income in those yrs. Long-term
borrowings 736 28.75% 1236 22.07% 2500 27.30% Decreased in 2013-14 & again increased i.
The key fact to grasp is that the cost of capital associated with an investment depends on the risk of that investment.
Thus, the cost of capital for a risk-free investment is the risk-free rate.
The cost of capital for a risky project, is greater than the risk-free rate, and the appropriate discount rate would exceed the risk-free rate.
We will henceforth use the terms required return, appropriate discount rate , and cost of capital more or less interchangeably because they all mean essentially the same thing.
It is a common error to forget this crucial point and fall into the trap of thinking that the cost of capital for an investment depends primarily on how and where the capital is raised.
Ipotesi di massimizzazione del valore di mercato di un’azienda quotata: i managers scelgono le opzioni di investimento e finanziamento che ritengono massimizzino il valore di mercato dell’azienda
Il valore di un’azienda è pari al valore scontato degli utili attesi futuri generati dagli assets posseduti, più il valore presente netto delle nuove opportunità di investimento che coinvolgano nuove spese in conto capitale
Per opportunità d’investimento si intende investire in progetti che hanno un rendimento maggiore a quello del mercato VPN positivo
Se una azienda ha progetti con VPN positivo e annuncia nuove spese in conto capitale (CAPEX) è molto probabile che accresca il suo valore di mercato
Similar to Sheet 2015-2017 Balance SheetSheet 2015-2017 Income Statement.docx (20)
Sheet1Rate your skills using the following scaleChapter 1 You Ma.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Rate your skills using the following scale:Chapter 1: You Make A DifferenceChapter 2: Credibility is the Foundation of Leadership1= Strongly Disagree4= AgreeQuestionScoreQuestionScore2= Disagree5= Strongly Agree20403= Partly Agree20090230140Total0Total01. Balance focusing on the future with an understanding of the present and events from the past.Chapter 3: Values Drive CommitmentChapter 4: Focusing on the Future Sets Leaders Apart2. Maintain self-awareness in external challenges or unexpected events.QuestionScoreQuestionScore70103. Support others in achieving their objectives through regular one-on-one meetings.1101502601604. Take time regularly to get updated on current events.Total0Total05. In conversation, provide undivided attention, show interest, and suspend judgment.Chapter 5: You Can’t Do It AloneChapter 6: Trust RulesQuestionScore6. Forthright and candid in all situations with all people.30QuestionScore170607. Show respect when questioning the ideas and opinions of others.250210Total02708. Take actions that create forward momentum.Total09. Attend industry functions and trade shows on a regular basis.Chapter 7: Challenge is the Crucible for GreatnessChapter 8: You Either Lead by Example or Don’t Lead At AllQuestionScoreQuestionScore10. Explore, identify, and define the nature, cause, and implications of problems.8013010018011. Demonstrate consistency between expressed beliefs, values, and actions.280240Total0Total012. Continuously give and receive feedback on results of learning efforts.13. Assess which role is most appropriate for the person and situation.Chapter 9: The Best Leaders Are The Best LearnersChapter 10: Leadership is an Affair of the HeartQuestionScoreQuestionScore14. Possess an understanding of business operations (budgeting, marketing, sales, etc.).1205019022030029015. Manage time in a way that balances personal and professional objectives.Total0Total016. Focus on actual results of a process or plan.17. Build relationships and ask questions to support a variety of initiatives.The totals from each chapter will show you your score.Refer to the range of scores to identify what type of further action you should take.18. Demonstrate an understanding of living and leading by example.3-6: Taking immediate action to improve your results is suggested.7-12: Develop action plans to be implemented over the next month.19. Identify and develop skills and effective behavior in others.13-15: You are performing well as a leader. Pinpoint areas to optimize your performance.20. Possess technical competencies to achieve relevant goals and objectives.21. Consistently and clearly communicates the desired results of a process or plan.22. Align people’s visions, values, goals, and action plans with bigger picture.23. Possess an understanding of industry trends.24. Identify and change self-defeating behaviors.25. Explore readiness to change and move ahead by knowing the stages of group development.26. Know what I value an.
Sheet1Quarter Sales PersonRegionQuarterly Sales31-MarSmithEast$75031-MarWilliamsEast$80031-MarJonesSouth$76531-MarWhiteWest$45631-MarJohnsonNorth$98731-MarTaylorWest$44331-MarYoungSouth$36831-MarHallEast$15930-JunSmithEast$1,20030-JunWilliamsEast$36930-JunJonesSouth$98030-JunWhiteWest$65030-JunJohnsonNorth$76030-JunTaylorWest$27830-JunYoungSouth$78030-JunHallEast$54730-SepSmithEast$69830-SepWilliamsEast$46730-SepJonesSouth$98330-SepWhiteWest$23730-SepJohnsonNorth$46930-SepTaylorWest$74030-SepYoungSouth$74930-SepHallEast$345
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6501_Week4_Discussion_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no .
Sheet1Quantity (miles of pipeline)Total CostTotal Fixed CostTotal .docxbjohn46
Sheet1Quantity (miles of pipeline)Total CostTotal Fixed CostTotal Variable CostAverage Fixed CostAverage Variable CostMarginal Cost0$ 5,000$ 5,0001,000$ 11,5732,000$ 18,2083,000$ 29,2674,000$ 44,7505,000$ 64,6576,000$ 88,9877,000$ 117,7408,000$ 150,9189,000$ 188,51810,000$ 230,54311,000$ 276,99112,000$ 327,86313,000$ 383,15914,000$ 442,87815,000$ 507,02116,000$ 575,58717,000$ 648,57718,000$ 725,99119,000$ 807,82820,000$ 894,08921,000$ 984,77422,000$ 1,079,88223,000$ 1,179,41424,000$ 1,283,37025,000$ 1,391,74926,000$ 1,504,55227,000$ 1,621,77828,000$ 1,743,42929,000$ 1,869,50230,000$ 2,000,000
Week 4
Will Fence owns a 70-acre large timber and Christmas tree farm. The Christmas farm gets busy in August and September when Will identifies and flags the trees suitable for Christmas season. Starting in October, the flagged trees will be cut, baled, and trucked to the storage yard where they will stay until shipped. The storage yard is situated in an area that offers shade and protection from the wind to maintain the freshness of the tree. The trees are stacked with the tops locked together to keep the sun and wind away from them.
Will has just purchased an additional 40 acres and will need to expand his storage yard by 40,000 square feet. The budget for this expansion is $55,000. Will has hired your team to design a process to contract resources to expand the storage yard.
Cover the following as requested by Will:
· Description of the contract resource procurement process (from start to closure).
· Explanation of how the contract resources procurement process that was described will assist Will in negotiating the best purchase.
· Explanation to Will why the team believes the process is efficient and achieves the results desired.
· Identification of any risks associated with procuring these resources and explanation of the role of risk management in this process.
· Explanation of how the process may be improved upon.
· Other recommendations the team may have for Will to consider.
Graphing Supply and Demand
Supply and demand are so important for both consumers and producers
because both of these concepts work together to determine the overall price
of an item, as well as the total quantity sold in a market. To see how this
works, we can show both on a graph such as you see in the header image
above.
Remember that demand is a relationship between price and the quantity that
consumers are willing and able to pay. This is an inverse, or negative,
relationship, in which the variable's price and quantity move in opposite
directions. This would be depicted as a downward sloping curve on a graph.
Similarly, supply is a relationship between the price of an item and the
quantity that producers are willing to supply. This is a direct, or positive,
relationship, in which the variable's price and quantity move in the same
direction. This would be depicted as an u.
Sheet1Pro Forma Income StatementYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Visi.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Pro Forma Income StatementYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Visits4,8825,1265,3825,6525,934Revenue Per Visit$450$450$450$450$450Gross RevenuePatient Reveue Gross Patient RevenueDeductions from Patient RevenueContractual Total Deductions from Revenue Net Patient Revenue$0$0$0$0$0Operating ExpensesSalaries and WagesEmployee BenefitsUtilitiesRepair/MaintenanceHousekeepingTelephone Service Depreciation MalpracticeMiscellaneous/OtherVariable Medical Supply CostsOther Non-Personnel Costs Total Operating ExpensesExcess of Rev over Exp. From Operations$0$0$0$0$0Cummulative Income$0$0$0$0$0Net Cash from Excess Rev (excl Depreciation)$0$0$0$0$0Cummulative Income Net Cash$0$0$0$0$0
Sheet2
Sheet3
Write an essay of about 750 to 1000 words, or 3 to 4 pages (double-
spaced), in response to the ALL the prompts below (4 Paragraphs) .
The relevant texts for Essay are the assigned:
* Sorensen, A Brief History of the Paradox, pp. 184- 185 on McTaggart
and pp. 173-176 on Augustine’s theory of time as subjective.
* David Lewis, “The Paradoxes of Time Travel”.
— Do not use any other outside sources! This is not a report on what
others have written about McTaggart or Lewis or time travel. This is
an exercise in thinking-by-writing!
Consider our discussions of, on one hand, McTaggart’s seemingly
paradoxical argument that time is “unreal” and, on the other hand,
Lewis’ account of the seemingly paradoxical possibility of time travel.
Write an essay in which you explore the potential “paradoxes” of time
we considered in McTaggart’s argument that “time is unreal” and in
Lewis’ account of time travel as “possible” in a “strange” possible world
(unlike our own).
Specifically, structure your narrative in response to the following
themes.
Paragraph 1: Explain the distinction between the “A series” and the “B
series” of time, as McTaggart introduced these terms. Why did
McTaggart think A time is more fundamental than B time? Why did he
think A time is impossible?
Paragraph 2: Explain Lewis’ distinction between “external time” and
“personal time”. How does Lewis’ distinction compare with
McTaggart’s distinction above?
Paragraph 3: Explain how, for Lewis, time travel is possible, even if
strange. What is a “person”, for Lewis? What then is “personal
identity”? How would the structure of a person over time, as Lewis
characterizes this form of personal identity, entail that a person could
travel either forward into the future or back into the past and encounter
“himself”/”herself”/”theirself” in a past or a future time?
Paragraph 4: Briefly: Do you find time travel, per Lewis, intuitively
possible? You may, if you like, consider the popular film “Back to the
Future” (1986), or you may consider how our imagination in science
fiction scenarios may address the possibility of time travel.
A U G U S T I N E ’S P R A G M A T I C P A R A D OX E S 173
became more alarming as philosophers became increasingly
persua.
Sheet1PMGT 576 Assignment Rubric – Unit 8 Assignment20Is the Lean .docxbjohn46
Sheet1PMGT 576 Assignment Rubric – Unit 8 Assignment20Is the Lean Canvas complete? Do each of the canvas sections demonstrate a clear understanding of the question or item posed? 20Do each of the canvas sections provide a clear, concise, and reasonable approach or description in addressing each one?20Does the canvas demonstrate creativity and innovation in addressing each of the sections?25The text is grammatically correct and there are no spelling or punctuation errors. 15Total100
CBIO Lab: Mitosis and Meiosis p. 1/10
Name:_________________________
Instructor: ___________ Section: ___
MITOSIS AND MEIOSIS
One of the tenets of cell theory is that all cells come from pre-existing cells. All individual
organisms begins with one cell, and yet in multicellular organisms the number of cells in the
adult may be in the trillions. This requires cells to repeatedly divide during the life of an
organism.
The average adult human body is made up of about 37 trillion cells. Of these, approximately 50
billion are fat cells and 2 billion are heart muscle cells. By the time you finish reading this
sentence, 50 million of your cells will have died and been replaced by others. Human cells are
estimated to divide nearly 2 trillion times every day. Amazingly, humans contain at least 10
times as many bacteria cells as human cells. The 100 trillion bacterial cells are much smaller
than human cells and have a faster generation time.
Mitosis and meiosis are two processes that produce new cells through cell division, which occurs
as a part of the cell cycle. The new “daughter” cells produced by these processes are quite
different because they have different purposes. These differences occur because the processes
have several key differences as outlined in the video lecture. You will be doing several lab
activities examining mitosis and meiosis and what can happen if problems occur during these
cell division processes.
Why are we doing this lab?
1. To gain a better understanding of the mitotic and meiotic processes of cell division that
occur in humans and all other animals.
2. To examine how issues in mitosis and meiosis can lead to diseases and disorders in
humans.
CBIO Lab: Mitosis and Meiosis p. 2/10
Background: Phases of mitosis
For each phase, draw and label:
a. Chromatin or chromosomes
b. Centrosomes
c. Microtubules/spindle
d. Cell membrane
CBIO Lab: Mitosis and Meiosis p. 3/10
Activity 1: Mitosis under the microscope
1. Use Google images of mitosis (Google “mitosis of onion root tip”) to identify cells in
interphase and all phases of mitosis.
Cells in…Interphase will have chromatin, not distinct chromosomes
Prophase will have distinctly visible chromosomes
Metaphase will have chromosomes lined up along the equator of the cell
Anaphase will have chromosomes separating at the centromeres
Telophase will have chromosomes decondensing into chromatin and a .
Sheet1Presentation by Tony StudentSlide NumberSlide TitleSlide Tex.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Presentation by Tony StudentSlide NumberSlide TitleSlide TextNarrativeComments1Social Media in the WorkplaceTitle Slide2Introduction“Twitter is not a technology, it’s a conversation – and it’s happening with or without you.” – Charlene Li, author
Over 306 million active Twitter users send 500 million Tweets daily *Hello, my name it Tony Student, I currently work as an Information Security Manager at a financial services firm in the Washington DC Metro area and am responsible for securing a multi-trillion dollar financial platform. Part of my responsibilities is to provide training and awareness on topics that deal with Information Security including the use of Social Media in the Workplace.
Social media is a powerful platform which helps connect people. According to Charlene Li, author of Groundswell, “Twitter is not a technology, it’s a conversation – and it’s happening with or without you.”
Consider the fact that every minute of every day roughly 5,800 tweets are posted to the Twitterverse. This amounts to over 500 million tweets daily! That statistic definitely echoes the sentiment of Charlene Li and is an important thing to consider when it comes to business. Social media can become a positive part of promoting a company's brand and allows a business to provide supreme customer service.3AgendaSocial Media Primer
Five Leading Practices on Social Media
Best Buy Case Study
Closing Remarks
Questions and AnswersFor today's agenda we are going to cover the following topics:
Social Media Primer - Which will provide insight into what social media is and its purpose
Five Leading Practices on Social Media - Tips on the appropriate use of Social Media
Best Buy Case Study - An example of how one big box retailer sets the tone and expectation on social media for business use
Closing Remarks - Final thoughts one how transformative social media can be for business
Questions and Answers - To be able to provide some time to answer those burning questions that you didn't realize you had until you saw this material.4Social Media PrimerAn online medium for social collaboration *
It’s all about the content
Pictures
Videos
Music
Social Media can enable business
Platforms include LinkedIN, Twitter, Facebook, etc.
According to the English Oxford Living Dictionary, Social Media are "Websites and applications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking."
In other words, social media in an online medium for social collaboration. All said and done, it's all about the content that people and companies produce and publish to the masses. The platform is an enabler for businesses to create accessibility for consumers to producers of a product or idea.
Examples of social media platforms that you may already be familiar with include, LinkedIN, a professional social networking site; Twitter, a microblogging site, and Facebook which originally started out as a place for college folks to collaborate and quickly turned .
Sheet1Pretax IncomeYang, Ziyun make sure to add back income t.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Pretax Income
Yang, Ziyun: make sure to add back income tax paid through Nov. See account 999 Nov balance.
Subject to State Taxes- 0State Tax- 0Subject to Fed Taxes
Yang, Ziyun: State Taxes can be deducted from Fed taxable income
- 0Progressive ratefirst 50,000 @15%7,500next 25,000 @ 25%6,250remainder @ 34%(25,500)Fed Tax(11,750)Federal Surtax
Yang, Ziyun: 5% on income over $100,000, surtax not to exceed $11,750
- 0
Yang, Ziyun: Updated in V2
Total Fed Tax(11,750)Total Income Tax(11,750)Less: Income Taxes Paid
Yang, Ziyun: Paid taxes through Nov. See account 999 Nov balance.
72,000Tax accrual
Yang, Ziyun: debit exp, credit payable
(83,750)
Sheet2
Sheet3
Research question
Human factors for changes in natural geology
Ivan Tai
Humans as major geological and geomorphological agents in the Anthropocene: the significance of artificial ground in Great Britain
Since the first prehistoric people started to dig for stone to make implements, rather than pick up loose material, humans have modified the landscape through excavation of rock and soil, generation of waste and creation of artificial ground. In Great Britain over the past 200 years, people have excavated, moved and built up the equivalent of at least six times the volume of Ben Nevis.
Simon J. Price
, Jonathan R. Ford
, Anthony H. Cooper
and Catherine Neal
Published:13 March 2011
2
Why I choose this research question?
Because human The natural changes are very large, from climate change to changes in topographical attitudes.
InstructionNarrative and InstructionsRockford Corporation is a wholesale plumbing supply distributor. The corporation was organized in 1981, under the laws of the State of Illinois, with an authorized capitalization of 100,000 sharesof no-par common stock with a stated value of $16 per share. The common stock is sold over thethe counter in the local area. You have been hired as of Thursday, December 25, 2018, to replace thecontroller, who has resigned. As controller, you are responsible for the corporation's accountingrecrods, preparation of the financial statements, safeguarding the corporate assets, and providingmanagement with financial information to set prices and to monitor and control operations. Rockford Corporation closes its books annually on December 31 but prepares financial statementsquarterly. Adjusting entries are posted to the general ledger only at year-end; at the end of the first, second, and third quarter the adjustments are entered only on a work sheet, not in the generalledger. Therefore, the adjusting entries to be recorded on December 31 are annual adjustments that you must journalize and the post to the general ledger accounts before preparing the financial statements.Rockford Corporation maintains a perpetual inventory system and takes a physical count each yearto adjust the inventory carrying amount. Purchases are recorded at the gross amount (discountstaken are recognized at the date of payment) of.
Sheet1PMGT 576 Assignment Rubric – Unit 7 Assignment20Are all of t.docxbjohn46
Sheet1PMGT 576 Assignment Rubric – Unit 7 Assignment20Are all of the 8 steps presented? Do the key elements of each step demonstrate a clear understanding of the concept? 25Is the importance of the step provided in a clear and concise manner? Is the approach to implementing each step reasonable and logical?20Do the strategies presented regarding staying on track, diagnosing the gaps, and managing resistance make sense and offer a good chance for success if implemented properly? 20The text is grammatically correct and there are no spelling or punctuation errors. 15Total100
Harrisburg TEXTILE CO.
(Kotter’s 8 stages Approach)
A Case Study Assignment
1
1
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE PROCESS
Harrisburg Textile Co.
In this assignment your team is the change management division at Harrisburg Textile.
Your leadership team has decided to use Kotter’s 8 step model to implement change and to transform the Harrisburg Textile into an Agile Lean organization.
Your team has been tasked with developing a plan to implement Kotter’s 8 step model and to provide the plan in a PowerPoint presentation to the company’s senior leaders within one week.
Using the information about the company and your knowledge of change management in general, and Kotter’s 8 step model in particular, your team is to design this presentation following the template provided. This presentation should be 8 to 12 slides in length with sufficient detail provided to allow for easy understanding by the senior leaders (i.e. your instructors!)
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE PROCESS
Harrisburg Textile Co.
Company Information: Harrisburg Textile is a family owned company in the fashion and textile industry. Harrisburg Textile manufactures its own designs, operates two small retail stores, offers wholesale products and does some exporting. The company has 50 employees and in its main manufacturing facility operates 39 pieces of machinery.
Short History:
Harrisburg Textile decided to increase the manufacture of certain products it previously outsourced and decided to add to the products they were buying from upscale fashion wholesale companies. This led to increased demands, and the company recognized it had to take steps to remain competitive not only through increasing capacity but through a complete organizational transformation. This rapid growth drove the company’s first step that being to change its business identity from LLC to corporation and Harrisburg Textile’s transformation journey started.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE PROCESS
Harrisburg Textile Co.
The company is faced with a number of issues affecting this transformation. These include:
Globalization, economic crisis and pressures: There is a need to grow, and to adopt new market requirements due to the global environment. Harrisburg Textile recognizes that must expand our borders in marketing, modernize systems and technologies, maintain a competitive advantage over other competitors, institutionalize a.
Sheet1Plan APlan BPro Forma Income Statement AccountsEBIT700100013.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Plan APlan BPro Forma Income Statement AccountsEBIT7001000130070010001300InterestEBT (EBIT - Interest)Tax Net IncomeTotal Shares OutstandingEPS
.
Sheet1Phase of Business Financal Management needsDebt FinancingEq.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Phase of Business/ Financal Management needsDebt FinancingEquity FinancingGift FinancingFinancing for StartupsConsumer Banks, Commercial Banks, SBA insured loans, Economic development agencies, Incubators, Accelerators, Leasing companies, Personal credit cardsFriends, family, Angels, Venture capital, direct public offering, CrowdfundingPersonal: Cash, pick up the tab, free use, free work, unpaid labor, overpayment, favored status/sweetheart deal forgiveness, deferralFinancing for GrowthCommercial banks, SBA, Private placement loans, Economic development agency, supplliers, leasing company, personal credit cardself generated funds, venture capital, direct public offering, merger, acquisitionInstitutional: SBIR, STTR grant, state grant, incubator, accelerator, dontated capital, tax abatement
Personal: Cash, pick up the tab, free use, free work, unpaid labor, overpayment, favored status/sweetheart deal forgiveness, deferralFinancing for Operationsfactor receivables, business cc, commercial bank, sba, private placement loans, suppliers, leasing companiesself generated funds, venture capital, direct public offeringInstitutional: SBIR, STTR grant, state grant, incubator, accelerator, dontated capital, tax abatement
Personal: Cash, pick up the tab, free use, free work, unpaid labor, overpayment, favored status/sweetheart deal forgiveness, deferralFinancing for Exitconsumer banks, Commercial Banks, SBA, private placement loans, economic development agencies, sba investment companies, suppliers, leasing companies, lines of creditself generate funds, venture capital, direct public offeringInstitutional: SBIR, STTR grant, state grant, incubator, accelerator, dontated capital, tax abatement
Personal: Cash, pick up the tab, free use, free work, unpaid labor, overpayment, favored status/sweetheart deal forgiveness, deferral
1
Email Communication Responses – No. 1 Employment Law Compliance Plan
Email Communication Responses – No. 1 Employment Law Compliance Plan
From:
To: “CEO Smith” [email protected][email protected]
Date: November 28, 2016
Re: Employment Law Compliance Plan
Mr. Smith:
With reference to the email sent to Nov.1, these are and will be the measures to take regarding your request
With the purpose of improving the operation of the company, it is necessary to review and update the policies of the company, as well as everything related to labor laws. This will provide the necessary means to comply with what is established by law and in turn with the company staff. If everything related to these issues is kept up to date, errors are less likely to be made when corrective measures are taken, just as it is of the utmost importance that all the members of the directive know in depth the laws that protect the workforce in all aspects. It is necessary to carry out the appropriate training as soon as possible. Remember that as a team, meeting these requirements is completely necessary.
Every decision taken, entails a res.
Sheet1PeriodEngine Failures(a) 4-period moving average(b) weighted moving average with weights of (6,3,1)(c) simple exponential smoothing with alpha=0.4 and period 2 follows naïve forecast(d) trend projection11552178326642955330632873768398Questions1. Please plot the data and describe the patterns2. Generate forecasts for all possible periods using above four methods3. Compute MAPE and explain which method you would recommend
Reflection
The module began with assessing the current teaching approach deployed by
teachers in class. As such, I noted that teachers are using theory for grading the
students instead of evaluating their practical skills. The pre-assessment given at the
inception of this module showed that only 18% of the 26 students in my
manufacturing class scored at the proficiency level while 70% of the students score
at a lower level between 59 percent and Zero. Based on this data, I found it
necessary to assess my students using Portfolio Assessment rubrics. This assessment
has been used before solely focused on the theoretical assumptions taught in class
while neglecting the practical skills. In this regard, the portfolio needs to be
changed to incorporate the practical skills. Thus, the portfolio will be structured to
integrate practical assessment for grading the students’ performance. Besides, the
evaluation approach has to be changed from a system that solely assesses the
student’s knowledge to one that can evaluate the student’s competence and abilities.
The portfolio assessment is a collection of purposeful documents that gives the
outlay on how tasks are completed and competency amongst the learners is
developed. Interest in using portfolio assessment in the class is developed as part of
moving away from the traditional approach used by instructors on grading based on
theory rather than ascertaining the student’s practical skills. In the past, the students
have been assessed through the class-based teaching practice to prove that they
had acquired the skills relayed by the instructor. It is through this that I felt the
teaching approach was not sufficient to enable the learners to grasp the required
competence and skills. To solve the issue of enhancing teaching and learning, I think
it is important for the teachers to practice the assessment through the use of a
portfolio with a different module, practicum. The integration of practicum module for
assessing the students is important as this enables the learner to acquire specific
techniques that are imperative for future success. Additionally, there are some
techniques that can be learned through actual experience. While theoretical
teaching might have been ideal in the past, the students should be assessed based
on their practical skills as it enhances a deeper understanding of concepts through
personal experience.
Notably, when I came in, the students had a problem with articulating what they
know with.
Sheet1Participant#Verbal Label Condition (Smashed or Hit)Age Condi.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Participant#Verbal Label Condition (Smashed or Hit)Age Condition (Under 60 years or Over 60 years)Speed (mph)Broken Glass? (Y or N)GenderAgeRaceEthnicityEV2HitOver 6040YMale74WhiteCuban-AmericanTV3HitOver 6055YFemale65From multiple racesFrom multiple Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino groupsEV3SmashedUnder 6070NFemale22From multiple racesI am not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoJT1SmashedUnder 6050YMale18AsianI am not Spanish, Hispanic or LatinoDB3SmashedOver 6025NFemale63Black or African-AmericanI am not Spanish, Hispanic or LatinoDB4SmashedUnder 6050YFemale31Black or African-AmericanI am not Spanish, Hispanic or LatinoJT2HitUnder 6045YFemale19Black or African-AmericanI am not Spanish, Hispanic or LatinoDB2HitOver 6065YMale62WhiteI am not Spanish, Hispanic or LatinoDB1HitUnder 6060NMale31Black or African-AmericanI am not Spanish, Hispanic, LatinoDJC4SmashedUnder 6024NFemale24AsianI am not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoDJC1HitOver 6060NFemale67WhiteI am not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoDJC2HitUnder 6045NFemale23WhiteI am not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoDJC3SmashedOver 6062YMale62WhiteI am not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoLM4HitOver 6070NFemale62From multiple racesI am not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoLM3SmashedOver 6040NFemale61WhiteI am not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoPH1SmashedUnder 6060NFemale27WhiteI am not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoLM4SmashedUnder 6080NFemale31Some other raceSome other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupPH4HitOver 6080NFemale71Some other race (Hispanic)Some other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupPH2SmashedOver 6050NFemale60Some other race (Hispanic)Puerto RicanPH3HitUnder 6025NFemale28Some other race (Hispanic)Puerto RicanLM2HitUnder 6060NFemale35From multiple racesPuerto RicanTV2SmashedUnder 6040NFemale36Some other race (Hispanic)Puerto RicanTV1HitUnder 6050NFemale40From multiple racesSome other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupDA2HitOver 6050NMale62Some other race (Hispanic)Some other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupDA1SmashedOver 6055NFemale65Some other race (Latino)Some other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupDA4HitUnder 6030YMale21Some other race (Latino)Some other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupDA3SmashedUnder 6035NMale19Some other race (Latino)Some other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupEV4HitOver 6040YFemale61WhiteSome other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupTV4SmashedOver 6055YFemale60WhiteSome other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupJT4SmashedOver 6050NMale66From multiple racesSome other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupJT13HitOver 6060YMale62Black or African-AmericanSome other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupJT14SmashedUnder 6070YMale30Black or African-AmericanSome other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupJT12HitUnder 6060YMale37Some other race (Hispanic)Some other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupJT11SmashedOver 6090NFemale67Black or African-AmericanSome other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupJT3HitOver 6080NFemale62Some other race (Hispanic)Some other Spanish, Hispanic, Latino groupEV1SmashedUnder 6025NFemale21WhiteN/A
Final Course Assignment.
Sheet1No.Strengths (3)Weaknesses (2)Recommendations (2)Evidence (used once only)Theory1Functional orientation
- evidence
- tangible product adv (features, performances, benefits)Inconsistent Messages
(say, do, confirm)It is recommended that supermarket A is to include the term 'wsl' in adv so as to .. Result of implementing consequences theory (journals on this theory)Strength 12Symbolic/experiential orientation
- cartoons, facial expressions, colours, pictures, animations
- emotional
- price ('8' - lucky/prosperity, '9' - longevity)ConsequencesStrength 23Category-dominance orientation (strengths only)
- brand name/logo of adv (evidence)
- e.g. FairPrice advertisement, Rolex, key sponsorsTrustworthinessStrength 34TOMASymbolic/experiential orientationSymbolic/experiential orientationWeakness 15Hierarchy EffectFunctional orientationFunctional orientationWeakness 26CPMAttributes
- what attracts ann advertisement
- features, product image, design, benefitsAttributesAttributesLaddering ProcessConsequences
- adv/benefits of using advertised products/services
- must believe/buy/agree your benefits & advConsequencesConsequencesValues
- quality
- experience post-purchase
- warranties, (money-back) guarantees, 3rd party endorsement, testimonial evidences, awards won, year of history, reputationValues
- critical weakness is that it lacks of…. Deemed to be a signofocant weakness… failed to apply Value Theory (journals)
- if the whole industry does not offer ____, do not take it as a weakness
- no need for comparisonValuesUnique Selling Proposition (USP)
- Superiority
- Unique
- Distinctive
*trademarks, patents, awards wonBrand Image (Transformational Advertising)
- brand logo
- fashion, prestegious productsResonance
- reflect audience life experience
- testimonial evidences
- before & after imagesResonance
- celebrity not good, lacks worthinessResonance
- change endorser (Jack Neo/Tiger Woods)Emotional
- colours, pictures, images, font size, choice of words, testimonial evidencesEmotional Pre-emptive
- message of superiority
- 'No. 1 top seller brand', 'Voted by many'
- country of originCelebrity Endorser
- TEARS model (credibility & attractiveness)
- trustworthiness, Expertise
- physical attractiveness, respect, similarity (to target audience)
- Brian WongCelebrity Endorser
- Jack NeoCelebrity Endorser
- It is recommended that XXX should engage XXX to endorse in the brand to increase attraciveness, expertise… Celebrity Endorser Theory (journal)Typical-person EndorserTypical-person EndorserTypical-person Endorser
- in order to increase attractiveness, recommended that XXX should engage a typical-person endorser (journal)Humour
- cartoons, facial expressions, vocabHumour
- cartoons, facial expressions, vocab*page 197 - theories
10
100PLUS ACTIVE
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
100PLUS ACTIVE
1. Executive Summary
Within marketing, there is a need to conduct promotions of products through .
Sheet1Moisture content analysis final resultsGroupValue of m3 (g)A.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Moisture content analysis final resultsGroupValue of m3 (g)A21.459B25 kPa34.35950 kPa18.771C19.282D17.816E23.651F26.148GTBCH28.664
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY
CIVIL ENGINEERING
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING: APPLICATION & THEORY (BEng)
Laboratory Experiment:
Undrained triaxial compression test (without pore water pressure measurement) BS
1377: Part 7: 1990.
Object of Experiment:
To determine the undrained shear strength of a soil using the triaxial compression test.
Theory/Apparatus:
The apparatus consists of a cell, which is filled with water under pressure; the
specimen is loaded vertically, via a proving ring to measure load.
Triaxial Cell
The vertical load on the specimen is increased until failure occurs, the vertical strain
being recorded at the same time using a dial gauge. The test is repeated on different
specimens from the same soil, using different values of cell pressure.
254
Stresses on specimen in Triaxial Cell
Cell Pressure Deviator Stress =P/A 1=3+P/A
1 = major principal stress
3 = minor principal stress
Therefore, P/A = (1-3) =Deviator stress
The deviator stress is the load on the specimen, P, divided by the cross sectional area
of the specimen. However, as the sample is compressed during the test, the cross
sectional area will increase. Therefore, in calculating the deviator stress an allowance
for the change in area must be considered.
For the calculation of deviator stress, it is assumed that the volume of the specimen
remains constant and that the sample will deform as a cylinder, e.g.
100%
o
X
Strain
L
1 3
P
Deviator stress
A
where P = vertical load, which is measured by a proving ring (kN)
A = Area calculated using the following method;
( ) )o o o oVolume V A L AL A L X
255
1
o o
o
V A
or A or A
L X
Method:
1. Extrude the sample from the tube and trim to size - soil sample of 38mm
diameter and 76mm long.
2. Sleeve the sample with the rubber membrane.
3. Put the sample on the pedestal at the bottom of the cell and seal with the
rubber ring. Place the loading cap on top of the sample and seal with rubber
ring, before securing top drainage tube.
4. Mount the cell over the sample and fill as per the
Flooding Triaxial Cell checklist.
5. Set-up the test with the Clisp Studio assistant, and complete the
Pressurising Triaxial Cell checklist before running the test stages.
6. When test stages are complete, end the test via Clip Studio and complete the
Draining Triaxial Cell checklist.
Results and Calculations:
• Sketch the failure mode of each sample.
• Calculate the moisture content of the soil as per Appendix A.
• Calculate the results as follows:
(i) For each sample tested:
• Find the failure strain (either the final value or.
Sheet1Learning Solultions Name:Version NumberMedium/Type:Lesson/ScenarioTaskOrderEventfunctionality descriptionGraphicsTextAnimationName the taskprovide name of screen/window/tab that is either new or needs to be modifieddescribe level of functionality needed - fully functional, view only, part functional part view only, etc.File names of screenprint JPEGs, gifs, tifs, and pngs.Text that must be programmed inDescribe internal movements or animations requiredLogin1Logon screenEntered text needs to move to the next screenlogin_dialog.jpgEnter your user name and password. For this exercise, use the name "student" and the password "learn".An arrow point to the login box.
What is the final product's medium (e.g., .SWF, .PPT, .PPS. Video, .WAV)
Think of sub-section as lesson or scenarios within the larger learning solution.
Sheet2
Sheet3
ALL STAR CAFÉ
NOVEMBER 2018
SALES PROFITS AND OPERATIONS
ACTION PLAN
MISSION STATEMENT: TO PROVIDE THE FRESHEST HIGH-QUALITY FOODS AND BEVERAGE PRODUCTS,
SERVED BY A FULLY TRAINED AND KNOWLEDGEABLE WELL TAKEN CARE OF STAFF PRODUCING,
OUTSTANDING PROFITS FOR OUR OWNERS
1) PERFECT EXECUTION OF OUR COMPANY’S MISSION STATEMENT AND CORE VALUES
BREAKDOWN
A. FRESHEST HIGHEST QUALITY PRODUCT INSURE PROPER RECEIVING, DATING, ROTATION OF
THE PRODUCT, PROPER INVENTORY LEVELS, INSURE ACCURATE ORDERS FOR LEVELS AS
WELL AS PREPARED PRODUCT
B. HIRE, TRAIN AND DEVELOP A KNOWLEDGEABLE STAFF THAT IS PAID APPROPRIATELY AND
GIVEN INCENTIVES TO MAINTAIN OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE. CONDUCT REGULAR EMPLOYEE
REVIEWS AND KEEP ISSUES OF COMMUNICATION OPEN
C. INSURE OPTIMAL PROFITS BY ENSURING THE BEST INDUSTRY PRICING MAKING SURE THAT
MARGINS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE INDUSTRY.
2) ENSURING MANAGEMENT AND STAFF ADHERE TO POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND PROTOL
MANAGEMENT, STAFF AND SHIFT MEETINGS.
● BREAKDOWN- HAVE EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK AVAILABLE
● HAVE REGULAR STAFF AND MGMT MEETINGS
● SET POLICIES THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY ENFORCED, DOCUMENTED.
3) RESPONSIBLE PARTY IS MAINTAINING A CLEAR ORGANIZED FACILITY
● USE OF CHECKLISTS
● STAFF UNDERSTAND EQUIPMENT
● STAFF UNDERSTANDS THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES
4) EFFECTIVE OVERSIGHT OF STAF IN CONSTRUCTION WITH MOMT TEAM AND HOW TO IDENTIFY
KEY PERSONNEL.
● REGULAR STAFF EVALUATION
● REGULAR STAFF PEP TALKS
REGULAR STAFF TRAINING SESSIONS
5) MONITORING THE DAILY+WEEKLY+MONTHLY FINANCIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS INCLUDING FLASH
REPORTS, INVENTORIES, EVALUATION, RECEIVING OF PRODUCT, MONITORING OF INVOICING,
S.P.M.H+ PRODUCTIVITY
A. UPDATE P.O.S, ASAP
B. BREAKDOWN OF REPORTS
C. ACCURATE REPORTING OF ALL MONITORED COSTS
6) OVERALL DEVELOPING AND CULTIVATING AN ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURE OF HIGH ENERGY
AND GUEST FIRST ORIENTED ATTITUDE THAT MOTIVATES AND PROMOTES TEAMWORK.
A. MANAGEMENT LEADS
B. STAFF ACCOLADES
C. ENERGY IS CONTAGIOUS!
7) ABILITY OF PERSONEL TO EVALUATE, ORGANIZA AND PRIORITIZE ACTIVITIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES, INCLUDING LABOUR MANAGEMENT, EM.
Sheet1LMH10090H80M70L605040302010NumberRisk NameFull Risk CostRisk ProbabilityFactored Risk costRisk Impact to ProjectRisk Mitigation PlanPoint of ContactExpected Risk Retire date1$20,00020%$4,000L2$03$04$05$06$07$08$09$010$0$0$0
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
7
Sheet2
Sheet3
Case Study:
Edward Bernays
Public Relations Pioneer
Who was Edward Bernays?
Born in Vienna in 1891, distant nephew of Sigmund Freud
His approach to public relations was to use symbols and the mass media to engineer consent
He claimed the public was essentially reactive
But the rise of the middle class meant that there was no longer the ruling class and the uneducated masses who followed dumbly . . .
What did he believe?
This emerging new social strata needed to be controlled and led.
He believed in a completely hierarchical view of society: the intelligent few have been charged with the responsibility of contemplating and influencing the tide of history and of dealing with the masses.
How did he deal with the masses?
Used sociology, psychology and economics and applied them to the messages and methods
He saw the PR expert as an applied social scientist educated to use an understanding of these three fields to influence and direct public attitudes (in a democratic society!)
How did he deal with the masses?
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”
Edward Bernays
What is PR?
“Of course, you know, we don’t deal in images, we deal in reality.”
For Bernays, PR was about creating and projecting credible renditions of reality itself.
He called news any overt act which stands out of the routine.
A PR expert carries out an overt act to interrupt the routine to bring out a response.
PR is the science of creating circumstances which do not appear to be staged.
Edward Bernays
“The public relations counsel sometimes uses current stereotypes, sometimes combats them and sometimes created new ones. In using them, he very often brings to the public a stereotype they already know, to which he adds new ideas, this fortifies his own and gives a greater carrying power.”
Edward Bernays
He fully believed that to manipulate the public, one must know its public as well as know who influences that public
PR experts, as molders of public opinion, must be ongoing monitors of social attitudes.
Edward Bernays
Part of this influencing involved using the implied authority, i.e. the social power of certain groups or leaders
E.g. “Damaged Goods” – he promoted a play about syphillis by securing members of high society and doctors as advocates
To encourage people to eat more bacon, he launched a campaign in which a doctor promoted the benefits of a hearty breakfast
Lucky Strikes
In 1929, Bernays was hired by the tobacco company that made Lucky S.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Sheet 2015-2017 Balance SheetSheet 2015-2017 Income Statement.docx
1. Sheet: 2015-2017 Balance Sheet
Sheet: 2015-2017 Income Statement
Sheet: 2015 -2017 Cash Flow
Sheet: Verizon stock History
Verizon Communications Inc (NYS: VZ)
Balance Sheet
Exchange rate used is that of the Year End reported date
As Reported Annual Balance Sheet
Report Date
12/31/2017
42735.0
12/31/2015
Currency
USD
USD
USD
Audit Status
Not Qualified
Not Qualified
Not Qualified
Consolidated
Yes
Yes
Yes
Scale
Thousands
Thousands
Thousands
2880000.0
4470000.0
Assets
-
350000.0
Current assets
2. 1.8358E7
1.4339E7
Cash & cash equivalents
2079000.0
845000.0
882000.0
Short-term investments
-
1.7513E7
1.3457E7
Accounts receivable, gross
2.4432E7
1202000.0
1252000.0
Less: allowances - accounts receivable
939000.0
882000.0
792000.0
Accounts receivable, net
2.3493E7
3918000.0
1959000.0
Inventories
1034000.0
2.6395E7
2.228E7
Assets held for sale
-
667000.0
709000.0
Prepaid expenses & other current assets
3307000.0
2.7117E7
2.5587E7
Total current assets
2.9913E7
3. 1.36737E8
1.29201E8
Land
806000.0
-
4.429E7
Buildings & equipment
2.8914E7
4.5639E7
-
Central office & other network equipment
1.45093E8
7627000.0
7104000.0
Cable, wiring & conduit
-
5710000.0
4907000.0
Cable, poles & conduit
4.7972E7
8718000.0
8365000.0
Leasehold improvements
8394000.0
2.32215E8
2.20163E8
Work in progress
6139000.0
1.47464E8
1.36622E8
Furniture, vehicles & other plant, property & equipment
9180000.0
8.4751E7
8.3541E7
Plant, property & equipment
2.46498E8
4. 1110000.0
796000.0
Less: accumulated depreciation
1.5793E8
8.6673E7
8.6575E7
Plant, property & equipment, net
8.8568E7
2.7205E7
2.5331E7
Investments in unconsolidated businesses
1039000.0
8897000.0
8338000.0
Wireless licenses
8.8417E7
613000.0
1.0267E7
Goodwill
2.9172E7
8536000.0
7512000.0
Other intangible assets, net
1.0247E7
2.4418E8
2.4464E8
Non-current assets held for sale
-
2477000.0
6325000.0
Other assets
9787000.0
168000.0
158000.0
Total assets
2.57143E8
5. -
6000.0
2645000.0
6489000.0
Liabilities and Equaity
7084000.0
6391000.0
Current liabilities
5717000.0
5281000.0
Long-term debt maturing within one year
3303000.0
3813000.0
4107000.0
Short-term notes payable
150000.0
1463000.0
1529000.0
Commercial paper & other short-term debt
-
1516000.0
2054000.0
Debt maturing within one year
3453000.0
1.9593E7
1.9362E7
Accounts payable
7063000.0
24000.0
463000.0
Accrued expenses
6756000.0
2914000.0
2969000.0
Accrued vacation, salaries & wages
4521000.0
6. 2375000.0
2323000.0
Interest payable
1409000.0
2789000.0
3446000.0
Taxes payable
1483000.0
8078000.0
8738000.0
Accounts payable & accrued liabilities
2.1232E7
3.034E7
3.5052E7
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
-
1.05305E8
1.10325E8
Advance billings & customer deposits
3084000.0
525000.0
686000.0
Dividends payable
2429000.0
1208000.0
2454000.0
Other current liabilities
2839000.0
-
1432000.0
Other current liabilities
8352000.0
1102000.0
-
Total current liabilities
3.3037E7
7. 5005000.0
-
950000.0
957000.0
Notes payable & other long-term debt
1.12901E8
-5716000.0
-5824000.0
Assumed notes
234000.0
-469000.0
-
Debentures
796000.0
1.0791E8
1.1003E8
Debentures & other long-term debt
-
2477000.0
6325000.0
Notes payable, debentures & other long-term debt
748000.0
1.05433E8
1.03705E8
Asset-backed debt
8913000.0
2.6166E7
2.9957E7
Capital lease obligations
1020000.0
4.5964E7
4.5484E7
Unamortized discount, net of premium
-7133000.0
6000.0
959000.0
8. Unamortized debt issuance costs
-534000.0
1.2239E7
1.1641E7
Long-term debt, including current maturities
1.16945E8
-
-
Less: long-term debt maturing within one year
3303000.0
424000.0
424000.0
Long-term debt
1.13642E8
1.1182E7
1.1196E7
Employee benefit obligations
2.2112E7
1.5059E7
1.1246E7
Deferred income taxes
3.1232E7
-713000.0
-554000.0
Non-current liabilities related to assets held for sale
-
-80000.0
-278000.0
Other liabilities
1.2433E7
46000.0
101000.0
Total long-term liabilities
1.79419E8
3420000.0
1281000.0
9. 2673000.0
550000.0
Equity
7263000.0
7416000.0
Common stock
424000.0
-449000.0
-428000.0
Contributed capital
1.1101E7
1508000.0
1414000.0
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
3.5635E7
2.4032E7
1.7842E7
Foreign currency translation adjustments
-468000.0
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
-111000.0
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
32000.0
Defined benefit pension & postretirement plans
3206000.0
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
2659000.0
Common stock in treasury, at cost
7139000.0
Deferred compensation - employee stock ownership plans &
other
-416000.0
Noncontrolling interest
1591000.0
Total equity
4.4687E7
10. Reference
MergentOnline.(2018)Verizon retrieved September 21, 2018
from:
http://www.mergentonline.com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/companyfinan
cials.php?pagetype=asreported&compnumber=36979&period=A
nnuals&dataarea=BS&range=3¤cy=AsRep&scale=AsRep
&Submit=Refresh
Verizon Communications Inc (NYS: VZ)
Income Statement
Exchange rate used is that of the Year End reported date
As Reported Annual Income Statement
Report Date
43100.0
12/31/2016
12/31/2015
Currency
USD
USD
USD
Audit Status
Not Qualified
Not Qualified
Not Qualified
Consolidated
Yes
Yes
Yes
Scale
Thousands
Thousands
Thousands
1.08468E8
1.14696E8
Operating Revenues
1.7512E7
1.6924E7
11. Service revenues & other revenues
1.07145E8
1.2598E8
1.3162E8
Wireless equipment revenues
1.8889E7
2.9186E7
2.9438E7
2.2238E7
2.3119E7
Total operating revenues
1.26034E8
3.1569E7
2.9986E7
Operating Expenses
1.5928E7
1.6017E7
Cost of services (exclusive of items shown below)
2.9409E7
9.8921E7
9.856E7
Wireless cost of equipment
2.2147E7
2.7059E7
3.306E7
Selling, general & administrative expense, net
3.011E7
-98000.0
-86000.0
Depreciation & amortization expense
1.6954E7
59000.0
115000.0
-1658000.0
71000.0
Total operating expenses
12. 9.862E7
-1599000.0
186000.0
Operating income
2.7414E7
4376000.0
4920000.0
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated businesses
-77000.0
2.0047E7
2.7639E7
Interest income
82000.0
939000.0
601000.0
Other income (expense), net
-2092000.0
2.0986E7
2.824E7
Other income & (expense), net
-2010000.0
7451000.0
5476000.0
Interest expense
4733000.0
148000.0
70000.0
842000.0
803000.0
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes - domestic
1.9645E7
8441000.0
6349000.0
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes - foreign
949000.0
-933000.0
13. 3377000.0
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes
2.0594E7
-2000.0
9000.0
Current provision (benefit) for income taxes - federal
3630000.0
-128000.0
130000.0
Current provision (benefit) for income taxes - foreign
200000.0
-1063000.0
3516000.0
Current provision (benefit) for income taxes - state & local
677000.0
7378000.0
9865000.0
Total current provision (benefit) for income taxes
4507000.0
1.3608E7
1.8375E7
Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes - federal
-1.436E7
-481000.0
-496000.0
Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes - foreign
-66000.0
1.3127E7
1.7879E7
Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes - state & local
-37000.0
4080000.0
4085000.0
Total deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes
-1.4463E7
4086000.0
14. 4093000.0
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
-9956000.0
4076684.0
4073175.0
Net income (loss)
3.055E7
3.22
4.38
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
-449000.0
3.21
4.37
Net income (loss) attributable to Verizon Communications Inc.
3.0101E7
2.285
2.23
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
4084000.0
160900.0
177700.0
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted
4089000.0
690741.0
602700.0
Year end shares outstanding
4079476.372
-159000.0
-208000.0
Net earnings (loss) per share - basic
7.37
Net earnings (loss) per share - diluted
7.36
Dividends declared
2.335
Total number of employees
15. 155400.0
Total number of stockholders
659979.0
Foreign currency translation adjustments
245000.0
Referance
Mergent Online. (2018) Verizon Retrieved September 21, 2018
from:
http://www.mergentonline.com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/companyfinan
cials.php?pagetype=asreported&compnumber=36979&period=A
nnuals&dataarea=PL&range=3¤cy=AsRep&scale=AsRep
&Submit=Refresh
Verizon Communications Inc (NYS: VZ)
Cash Flow
Exchange rate used is that of the Year End reported date
As Reported Annual Cash Flow
Report Date
12/31/2017
12/31/2016
12/31/2015
Currency
USD
USD
USD
Audit Status
Not Qualified
Not Qualified
Not Qualified
Consolidated
Yes
Yes
Yes
Scale
Thousands
Thousands
Thousands
16. 1.3608E7
1.8375E7
1.5928E7
1.6017E7
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
2705000.0
-1747000.0
Net income (loss)
3.055E7
-1063000.0
3516000.0
Depreciation & amortization expense
1.6954E7
1420000.0
1610000.0
Employee retirement benefits
440000.0
138000.0
127000.0
Deferred income taxes
-1.4463E7
-5067000.0
-945000.0
Provision for uncollectible accounts
1167000.0
61000.0
-99000.0
Equity in losses (earnings) of unconsolidated businesses, net
of dividends received
117000.0
449000.0
942000.0
Accounts receivable
-5436000.0
-1079000.0
2545000.0
17. Inventories
168000.0
-
-
Other assets
656000.0
-
-
Accounts payable & accrued liabilities
-335000.0
-4385000.0
-1411000.0
Discretionary contribution to qualified pension plans
-3411000.0
2.2715E7
3.893E7
Net gain on sale of divested businesses
-1774000.0
-1.7059E7
-1.7775E7
Other operating activities, net
672000.0
-3765000.0
-3545000.0
Net cash flows from operating activities
2.5305E7
-534000.0
-9942000.0
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
9882000.0
48000.0
Capital expenditures (including capital software)
-1.7247E7
493000.0
1171000.0
Acquisitions of investments & businesses, net of cash acquired
18. -5928000.0
-1.0983E7
-3.0043E7
Acquisitions of wireless licenses
-583000.0
1.2964E7
6667000.0
Proceeds from disposition of businesses
3614000.0
4986000.0
-
Other investing activities, net
772000.0
-1.9159E7
-9340000.0
Net cash flows from investing activities
-1.9372E7
-
-
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
-149000.0
-344000.0
Proceeds from long-term borrowings
2.7707E7
-9262000.0
-8538000.0
Proceeds from asset-backed long-term borrowings
4290000.0
3000.0
40000.0
Repayments of long-term borrowings & capital lease obligations
-2.3837E7
-
-5134000.0
Repayments of asset-backed long-term borrowings
-400000.0
19. -2705000.0
1634000.0
Decrease (increase) in short-term obligations, excluding current
maturities
-170000.0
-1.3322E7
-1.5015E7
Dividends paid
-9472000.0
-1590000.0
-6128000.0
Proceeds from sale of common stock
-
4470000.0
1.0598E7
Purchase of common stock for treasury
-
2880000.0
4470000.0
Other financing activities, net
-4852000.0
9577000.0
5293000.0
Net cash flows from financing activities
-6734000.0
4085000.0
4491000.0
Increase (decrease) in cash & cash equivalents
-801000.0
Cash & cash equivalents, beginning of period
2880000.0
Cash & cash equivalents, end of period
2079000.0
Cash paid for income taxes, net of amounts refunded
4432000.0
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized
20. 4369000.0
Mergent Online. (2018) Verizon Retrieved September 21, 2018
from:
http://www.mergentonline.com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/companyfinan
cials.php?pagetype=asreported&compnumber=36979&period=A
nnuals&dataarea=CF&range=3¤cy=AsRep&scale=AsRep
&Submit=Refresh
Verizon Communications Inc (NYS: VZ)
Issue: Verizon Communications Inc(NYS:VZ)
Time Period: 3 years
Frequency: daily
Adjusted Prices
Historical Pricing
Date
Open
High
Low
Close
Volume
Price Move (%)
09/21/2018
09/20/2018
53.317
09/19/2018
09/18/2018
-0.57
09/17/2018
54.79
55.0199
09/14/2018
09/13/2018
09/12/2018
09/11/2018
1.11
09/10/2018
09/07/2018
47. cap had grown almost 12% from $318
billion to $356 billion over the same time.1 Exhibit 1 depicts
Amazon’s revenue, net income, and oper-
ating expenses from 1996 to 2016.
As Amazon evolved with technology, traditional boundaries
between hardware and software, products
and services, and online and bricks- and-mortar stores had
become increasingly blurred. As a result,
Amazon found itself engaged in a fierce competitive battle for
control of the emerging digital ecosys-
tem, pitted itself against technology giants such as Alphabet
(Google’s parent company), Alibaba, and
even Microsoft and Apple.
Throughout this digital transformation, Amazon’s investors
remained focused on the long-term,
because consistent profitability continued to elude the company.
Sales, however, increased quarter after
quarter, fueling optimism in what the long-term projects the
company invested in could mean for
future profitability and growth. Investors are by now quite
familiar with the three pillars of Amazon
that Bezos likes to talk about: the e-commerce marketplace, the
Prime membership program, and
Amazon Web Services (AWS). But will this be enough going
forward? While Amazon was starting to
post some profits, its stock was down 7% after the last quarterly
results were posted in 2016.2
As Bezos gazed out of the office window into the darkness, he
could not help but ask himself that
very question: What should be the fourth pillar of Amazon?
After all, Amazon had launched a smart-
phone, a set-top box for video streaming, a music streaming
service, in-house video programming,
49. REV: MAy 25, 2017
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
2
Amazon.com, Inc.
unprecedented. How would such a dynamic affect profits and
shape the company’s investment for-
tunes? And then, of course, there was the potential threat that
Alibaba, and now even Walmart, posed
to Amazon’s bread-and-butter online retailing. Struggling to
make sense of it all, Bezos got up to grab
a much-needed can of Monster Energy Lo-Carb drink out of his
office fridge. He opened the can, took
a sip, sat back down, took out a legal pad, and began to jot
down some talking points for the upcom-
ing investor call.
A Brief History of Amazon
Jeff Bezos started out as a computer specialist at D. E. Shaw, a
hedge fund company in New york. In
the early 1990s, he noticed the rapid growth of the internet and
was drawn to its potential for a new
era of retail services. Still, he needed a product that would lend
itself easily to online sales in order
50. to break ground in this new arena. After brainstorming many
possible ideas, Bezos settled on books,
which are easily sourced and warehoused. Books are also an
ideal commodity because they are iden-
tical products regardless of where they are purchased (in a
brick-and-mortar bookstore or online).
This in turn reduced customer uncertainty about transacting
online, which was new at the time. Also,
an Internet store can carry a significantly larger inventory of
books than typical bricks-and-mortar
establishments. Placing all bets on his new business plan, Bezos
moved from New york City to Seattle,
Washington. When Jeff Bezos started Amazon.com out of a
garage in a Seattle suburb in 1994 to sell
books online, he furnished his makeshift office with discarded
wood doors for desks. In less than 25
years, Amazon morphed from a fledgling start-up into one of
the world’s most valuable companies,
active in far-flung businesses from e-commerce and cloud
computing to media entertainment. As of
December 31, 2016, Amazon employed more than 341,000
employees. yet, wood doors turning into
desks remain a staple at Amazon, where strict cost control is
paramount to this day. Exhibit 2 shows
Amazon’s key events and market capitalization over time.
Amazon’s First Decade, 1995–2005. Amazon’s website
officially went live in July 1995.3 It was an
instant success with book lovers everywhere. The online startup
set itself apart from other Internet
merchants by pioneering one-click shopping, customer reviews,
and order verification via e-mail.
Early on, customer service representatives wrote personalized
emails to each customer after orders
were placed.4 These innovations made it easy and convenient
for online shoppers to adopt Amazon’s
51. services and continue to use them. By September 1995, the
company was already generating $20,000 in
sales per week. As a result, the startup rapidly outgrew its 400-
square-foot office (which was actually a
garage) in Bellevue, Washington. Over the next few years,
Amazon moved to new warehouses several
times to accommodate its growing volume of business.
With revenue of $15.6 million by 1997, Amazon’s book sales
far exceeded those of even its largest
bricks-and-mortar bookstores. Riding high on consistent growth
each quarter, Amazon completed a
successful initial public offering (IPO) on May 16, 1997. By
1998, Amazon had become the sole book
retailer on AOL’s and Netscape’s commercial channels. Later
that same year, Amazon hit a momentous
benchmark when its market capitalization exceeded that of both
Barnes & Noble and Borders, its two
largest bricks-and-mortar competitors.5
Exhibit 3 depicts Amazon stock performance relative to the
NASDAQ-100 Index since its initial
listing. Over the last decade, Amazon’s stock appreciated by
close to 2,000 percentage points, while
the NASDAQ-100 Index appreciated 200 percentage points.
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
52. 3
Amazon executed a series of strategic alliances as well as
acquisitions to rapidly expand its prod-
uct and service offerings. For example, Amazon bought
junglee.com, an aggregation and comparison-
shopping service provider, and incorporated its technology
directly into Amazon’s own website.6 The
service tracked users as they browsed products on Amazon.com
or affiliated websites, and displayed
related or complementary products that might interest each user
based on the information collected.
The resulting user experience resembled a process of
“spontaneous discovery,” as though each indi-
vidual customer was walking the aisles of a traditional store.
Based on the browsing history, the online
store was individualized to the user’s preferences and choices.
Similarly, Amazon entered online video
sales through the purchase of IMDb (Internet Movie Database)
and expanded into Europe with the
acquisition of online booksellers BookPage and Telebook.7
In 1999, Amazon partnered with Sotheby’s, a fine arts auction
house, to offer online auctions.8 Later,
it added several more dot-coms to its portfolio using $1.25
billion raised through a bond offering.
Among the companies acquired were HomeGrocer.com,
Pets.com, and Living.com, as well as catalog
businesses Back to Basics and Tool Crib of the North. In
addition, Toys“R”Us and Amazon brokered a
deal to form a co-branded toy and video game store. Although
the contract was intended to last ten
years, the deal came to an early end when Toys“R”Us accused
Amazon of violating the contract by
selling toys from other vendors. Amazon spent $51 million to
53. settle the litigation.
Internationally, Amazon added warehouses as well as country-
specific sites in 1998 in the United
Kingdom (amazon.co.uk) and Germany (amazon.de) to
accommodate its growing popularity in
Europe. In addition, for $75 million, Amazon purchased
Joyo.com, China’s largest online book, music,
and video retailer as a way to gain footing in the world’s largest
internet market.9 French (amazon.fr)
and Japanese (amazon.co.jp) Amazon sites debuted in 2000.
After the internet bubble of the late 1990s
burst, Amazon went through a large restructuring effort in 2001,
resulting in a $150 million charge
and a 15% reduction in its work force.
This proved to be only a temporary setback, as the company
quickly entered a new phase of prod-
uct and service proliferation. In that same year, Amazon was
contracted by Borders to provide inven-
tory, fulfillment, content, and customer services. It also became
an accredited internet domain name
registrar through the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers (ICANN), a privilege that
only 160 entities could claim. The company expanded its
presence in consumer product segments by
partnering with hundreds of clothing retailers in 2002 to initiate
a clothing sales department.
Amazon launched its “search inside the book” feature in 2003,
permitting customers to search the
contents of more than 120,000 books prior to purchase. Shortly
thereafter, Amazon launched another
site called askville.com. It was designed to connect users by
allowing them to ask each other questions
about anything.
54. Amazon launched its premium subscriber service, Amazon
Prime, in 2005. Subscribers paid $79
(now $99) a year and received free two-day shipping on Prime
products from Amazon.com, as well as
access to Amazon’s Instant Video service. In an attempt to
boost Prime membership, Amazon acquired
rights to exclusive content from Discovery Communications and
other content providers, providing
Prime customers with access to unlimited instant streaming of
more than 18,000 movies and some
2,000 TV titles.10, 11
Amazon’s Second Decade, 2006–2016. Amazon Web Services
(AWS) is Amazon’s full-feature,
cloud-based service that includes computing and storage
capacity, content delivery, data management,
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
4
Amazon.com, Inc.
software, networking, payment and billing systems, and other
applications.12 Launched in 2006, the
unit came about as Amazon struggled in the early 2000s with
slow software development processes.
To accelerate this, the company built a set of in-house
55. infrastructure services that would allow its retail
business to move more quickly. Amazon, however, only needed
its full capacity for about six weeks of
the year, during each holiday season. Amazon quickly realized
that such on-demand web services and
computing power would be valuable and useful for other
companies and formed a business around
the infrastructure. Subsequently, entities ranging from tech
startups to government agencies (such as
the CIA) have rented server space, storage, and computing
capability from AWS. For a time being, even
the infamous WikiLeaks was hosted on AWS, until Amazon
ended the relationship in 2010. Given its
early lead, by 2016, AWS had the largest market share in this
space with 31%, before Microsoft’s Azure
(9%), IBM’s Cloud (7%), Google and Salesforce (each 4%),
with the remaining market share held by other
providers. In 2016, AWS revenues were $12 billion, but
bringing in $1 billion in profits (Exhibit 4).
On a local level, in 2006 Amazon started a dry grocery service
in Seattle, expanding it in 2007
to include perishables. Amazon also continued its growth in the
entertainment industry. In 2007, the
company launched an MP3 site that sold audio files to users
without copyright restrictions. It also
acquired Brilliance audio, an audiobook publisher, and launched
a video-on-demand service that
allowed users to stream or download movies and TV shows.
This included a social-networking site
exclusively for book lovers called Shelfari. Amazon also
launched Endless.com, a shoe and accessories
e-tailer, in 2007, and later grafted it into its main site at
Amazon.com/Fashion.
In 2007, Amazon also ventured into hardware development with
56. the release of the first-generation
Kindle, which sold out in less than six hours. This was not
surprising because Amazon sells its Kindle
devices at or even below cost.13 This has enabled the company
to penetrate the e-reader and tablet
market where competitors such as Apple have a strong hold.
Amazon’s losses from sales of computer
hardware more than made up for by the sales of e-books,
movies, and other digital content sold
through the Kindle. Subsequent editions incorporated new
features such as a larger screen (DX), a
keyboard (Kindle Keyboard), and a touchscreen (Kindle
Touch).14
To provide a more seamless reading and educational experience,
Amazon complemented the Kindle
line of tablets and e-readers with the purchase of Audible, an
digital audio books provider, for $300 mil-
lion in 2008.15 In 2013, Amazon also acquired the website
Goodreads.com, a book-sharing social net-
work that provides user-generated book reviews and reading
lists, for an undisclosed amount.16
To take advantage of the anticipated popularity of e-books and
e-readers, Amazon launched Kindle
Direct Publishing (KDP) in conjunction with the Kindle in
2007, to make it easier for authors to self-
publish books. An author can publish their work through KDP
quickly and have it available around
the world the next day via Kindle devices and the Kindle app.
Independent publishers receive a 70%
royalty while maintaining the flexibility to make changes to
their work at any time. Paper-bound cop-
ies may be printed using Amazon’s Create Space services. In
2011, sales from e-books surpassed paper
book sales for the first time.17 A subscription to Prime also
57. provides users with access to more than
350,000 book titles through the Kindle Owners’ Lending
Library, making Amazon Prime an integral
part of the Kindle experience. Sales of the Kindle itself were
estimated at 20 million units in 2013.18
In 2008, Amazon acquired Zappos, an online shoe company
known for exceptional customer service,
for $1 billion. Amazon runs Zappos as an independent
subsidiary with its own site (zappos.com). That
same year, Amazon sold its European online DVD rental
services to LOVEFiLM International for a 40%
share in its business; it purchased the remaining shares in 2011
to complete the acquisition. Amazon
also became a major investor in The Talk Market, a user-created
TV Shopping Channel.
19
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
5
The breadth of products and services on offer at Amazon helped
insulate it from the worst of the
fallout from the 2008–2009 global recession. In fact, online
retail rose by 11% in 2009 despite the
58. depressed economy as shoppers were looking for bargains
online. Americans buying items online
increased from 27% of all Internet users in 2000 to nearly 63%
in 2014, and is projected to reach 68
percent by 2018, spurred at least in part by Amazon’s rapid and
continued growth.20, 21 Amazon’s
growth has come from the company’s traditional strengths (for
example, books and retailing), as well
as from other areas that the company continues to invest in and
focus on. However, the focus on
peripheral businesses has hit company profits because Amazon
invests heavily in areas such as new
fulfillment centers to improve shipment times, expansions of the
Amazon Prime media service, and
development of its smart devices.22 See Exhibit 5 for Amazon’s
financial performance over the past
five years.
In 2009, Amazon introduced Amazon Basics or its own brand of
products (e.g., phone charging
cables, batteries, laptop stands, etc.). Amazon branding its own
products further lowers costs and it
also increases the percentage of sales that it retains. Amazon
branded batteries have grown to be
roughly one third of that category’s entire sales, and Amazon is
extending its brand into additional
categories, ranging from electronics to kitchen products and
even suitcases.
In 2012, the company launched AmazonSupply (now
AmazonBusiness) to offer business clients prod-
ucts such as mechanical parts, janitorial supplies, and medical
supplies. By 2014, the AmazonBusiness
catalog of products features 2.2 million items, relative to the
market leader’s 1.2 million items.23 In
May 2016, Amazon announced that its wholesale unit,
59. AmazonBusiness, had sold goods worth $1 bil-
lion in its first year of operation. Amazon in its bid to capture a
pie of the $7.2 trillion large annual
wholesale and distribution market has close to nine million
items and is adding customers at a rate
of about 20% per month.24
In 2013, Jeff Bezos announced that Amazon would start
working on drone delivery of packages
under the name of Prime Air. Drones are expected to pick up
packages from the fulfillment centers,
deliver them to the customer’s doorstep, and return to the
fulfillment center with no human involve-
ment. On the trip, drones rely on GPS data to chart a course and
drop packages. While this initiative
was welcomed by customers, the project was delayed due to
several issues including battery life of
drones, weather, unreliable GPS data, and aggressive birds.
Besides technical hurdles, Prime Air ser-
vices were also hampered by Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) regulations (in the U.S.) for using
drones commercially. Nonetheless, on December 7, 2016
Amazon Prime Air completed its first deliv-
ery using a drone. The package was delivered to a customer in
the Cambridge area of England and
made it to the customer’s home just 13 minutes after the order
was placed.25 In early 2014, Amazon
filed for a patent for an Airborne Fulfillment Center (AFC),
indicating that Amazon expects a big-
ger role for drone deliveries than just local warehouse-to-
doorstep delivery. The AFC is expected to
essentially be an airship flying at altitudes of 45,000 ft. that
would house the items Amazon sells. The
patent explains a method for drones to fly into the warehouse,
pick up the items to be delivered and
deliver them, all while continually airborne.26
60. To complement the Kindle, Amazon has launched peripheral
smart devices. In 2014, Amazon
launched the Fire smartphone. The device boasted features that
included hands-free scrolling, holo-
graphic images, and software that uses the phone’s camera to
detect merchandise in an effort to do
“something different and better.”27 While the hardware
competed with smartphones from Samsung,
Google, and Apple, the differentiation lies in the potential for
the phone’s software to facilitate shop-
ping, with some analysts likening the device to the one-click
check out that the company introduced
on its website in the late 1990s. Thus, the device’s “Firefly”
feature enables the user to point the phone
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
6
Amazon.com, Inc.
at conceivably any item that can be purchased on Amazon,
including music and television shows, and
then order it online in seconds. This creates the opportunity for
commerce at just about any moment
for the consumer who carries the device. The device also offers
unlimited photo storage via Amazon’s
cloud, circumventing a common issue by which users, who
61. typically rely on their smartphone as their
primary camera, have diminished storage space for apps or
music due to the data drain of storing
photos on the device itself.
Despite the promise and the launch fanfare, the device proved to
be a major disappointment. Users
gave the device an approval rate of just over 50%, and
reviewers described the device as “forgettable”
and “mediocre.”28 To entice consumers to buy the device, the
company reduced the price from $199, to
$0.99. But even this radical move failed to help gain share in
the smartphone market against the likes
of Apple, Google, and Samsung. Weak sales of the device meant
that the anticipated added consumers
funneled to Amazon’s online store via the phone did not
materialize. Overall, it is estimated that the
company took a $170 million write-down and has sold less than
50,000 units (compared with over
20 million units for Apple’s iPhone 6, a mere four months after
launch).29 30 In short, the Fire phone
was Amazon’s first significant misstep for a company that has a
habit of making diversification and
expansion into adjacent businesses a success.
In April 2014, Amazon also launched Fire TV, a set-top box
that streams video and games. This put
Amazon in the market for consumer’s living rooms, where the
likes of Apple, Google, Roku, and even
Comcast had their own devices already on the market for
content streaming. Fire TV, as with the Fire
phone, was introduced with an upfront price tag, which is
contrary to Amazon’s tradition of offering
its hardware to consumers at cost, and charging for related
services and/or content. Despite Amazon’s
assurances that the device was geared more toward
62. entertainment as opposed to selling merchandise,
the company admitted that the shopping aspect of the device
was anticipated to “get in the way of the
entertainment focus of the device.”31 However, consumer
reception of the device was strong, very much
unlike the Fire phone. Since launch, it is estimated that more
than 10 million fire TV boxes have been
installed.32, In October 2014, the company launched the HDMI
stick version of the set-top box, which
is not only more cost effective than the box iteration of the
device ($39 versus the set-top box’s $99),
but makes integration between Fire TV, a Fire phone, and a Fire
tablet seamless and convenient for
consumers who have compatible devices.
34
In addition to its e-book offerings, Amazon has been expanding
the online content that is available
to its customers (particularly those who use Amazon devices) in
an effort to position the company as
a central hub to its consumers. In 2014, Amazon Appstore, the
company’s virtual portal to apps and
games for its mobile devices, offered more than 240,000 apps
and games and is designed to directly
rival Google’s Play and Apple’s App Store platforms (although
the latter platforms offered consumers
over one million apps).35 Since June 2014, Amazon has been
providing Prime Music, an online music
streaming option that is free for Amazon Prime subscribers. The
service is designed to rival the likes
of Spotify and Pandora, but without the advertising that has
long been an annoyance for consumers,
yet which is vital as a revenue stream to music-streaming
services.36
63. Similarly, and in conjunction with the launch of Fire TV,
Amazon also began to offer video stream-
ing as a means to compete with Google’s youTube and Netflix.
Launched with Fire TV, the service
gives subscribers a library of content to stream, which
encompasses not only Netflix, Hulu, and ESPN,
but also Amazon’s own Prime Instant Video library.37 In
addition, Amazon has taken the initiative in
streaming content by partnering with HBO. This marked the
first time a player in traditional cable
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
7
entered the online content-streaming space. The deal was seen
as a significant blow to Netflix, given
that it prevented HBO’s parent company Time Warner from
striking a similar deal with Amazon’s com-
petitors, including Netflix and Hulu.38
As a step further, Amazon created its own content for
streaming, which has even garnered critical
acclaim: the company’s television series Transparent won a
2015 Golden Globe.39 The independent
movies are intended for theatrical release and will be available
for digital streaming as part of the
64. Prime library within two months of release—as opposed to three
months or more with respect to
typical theatrically-released movies.40 “X-ray for Movies” was
developed through Amazon’s acquisition
of IMDb, allowing users to interact with the video to obtain
detailed information about the movie’s
characters, directors, writers, and other elements. This feature
has been extended to most Amazon
Videos offerings. There is also an “X-ray” product for books
that offers the same features except that
terms are linked from the books to youTube and Wikipedia.
In an extension of its video-streaming capability, Amazon has
also expanded into the realm of video
gaming through its acquisition of Twitch Interactive. Twitch
broadcasts video of consumers playing
a variety of video games, and it is the fourth largest source of
internet traffic behind only Netflix,
Google, and Apple. Amazon has made an active push into video
gaming, expanding the number of
programmers it employs and introducing several new video
games as part of its Fire TV offering.41
In November 2014, Amazon introduced Echo, a new category of
devices that are controlled solely by
voice commands. The device equipped with a speaker system
connects to the owner’s Amazon account
and allows purchases to be made using voice commands. It
plays music from Amazon Music, Spotify,
and Pandora accounts using voice commands. It allows users to
control lights, switches, and thermo-
stats with compatible smart home devices. Introduced with an
upfront price tag of $179.99, it uses
Amazon Web Services to constantly learn and add functionality
over time. A few months after the
launch, Amazon added the Tap and Dot devices as lower cost
65. alternatives to the Echo. They contain
the same proprietary digital voice assistant, Alexa, as the Echo.
Within a few months of the launch,
Echo devices have overtaken all Amazon hardware devices in
sales dollar volume. In December 2016,
Amazon was estimated to have sold 5.2 million units worldwide
during the year, excluding holiday
sales.42
Alexa, the voice service that is embedded in the Amazon Echo,
Echo Dot, and Amazon Tap, enables
customers to interact with devices in a more intuitive way using
voice. The goal of Alexa was inspired
by the computer voice and conversational system on board the
starship Enterprise in science fiction
TV series, Star Trek. Alexa runs on the cloud and adapts to
speech patterns, vocabulary, and the user’s
preferences. Alexa allows app creators and developers to
directly market services to customers rang-
ing from ordering flowers to reading the daily news headlines as
well as audio books from Audible.
The Amazon Echo was the number one selling product across all
$100+ products on Amazon.com
on Black Friday 2015. Amazon has also created the Alexa Fund
that provides up to $100 million in
investments to fuel voice technology innovation. Alexa is one
of the first breakthrough products and
services using artificial intelligence and machine learning
combined with a voice-activated interface.
Many observers see this as the future of computing.43
Amazon continues to diversify at a relentless pace. Besides
offering same-day delivery of grocer-
ies in some metropolitan areas and testing drones for even faster
distribution, Amazon now plans
to capture a large piece of the over $10 billion college
66. bookstore market. In a pilot project, Amazon
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
8
Amazon.com, Inc.
initiated a student-centered program at three large universities:
Purdue University, the University of
California, Davis, and the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
The goal of Amazon Campus is co-
branded university-specific websites that offer textbooks,
paraphernalia such as the ubiquitous logo
sweaters and baseball hats, as well as ramen noodles!
As part of this new campus initiative, Amazon offers its Prime
membership to students at a 50
percent discount ($49 a year) and guarantees unlimited next-day
delivery of any goods ordered online,
besides all the other Prime membership benefits (free streaming
of media content, loaning one e-book
a month for free, discounts on hardware, etc.). To accomplish
next-day delivery, Amazon is build-
ing fashionable delivery centers on campus, university co-
branded such as “[email protected]” Once
a package arrives, students receive a text message and can then
retrieve it via code-activated lockers
or from Amazon employees directly. The on-campus delivery
67. facilities also serve as student return
centers.
Amazon’s new campus initiative allows it to bind a younger
generation of shoppers ever closer
into its web of products, services, and content. Next-day
delivery makes students less likely to shop
at traditional campus bookstores. Amazon also has a history of
selling textbooks at a discount in
comparison to old-line campus bookstores. All course materials
automatically qualify for next-day
delivery and do not require a Prime membership. The Amazon
Campus initiative is predicted to save
students $200 to $400 a year on textbooks and other supplies.
Another area of focus for Amazon is its supply chain. From the
start, Amazon has been opening
centrally-located warehouses to save on a key cost component–
shipping. Shipping costs remain one
of Amazon’s main cost drivers, and the technology company is
committed to continue lowering it.
While Amazon lost close to $7.2 billion in shipping costs last
year, it has also been able to achieve
higher efficiency by building its own infrastructure. Even
though Amazon has been offering free ship-
ping on increasingly more items, it has still witnessed an uptick
in percentage shipping costs being
recovered in the form of shipping revenue from 34.6% in 2011
to 53.3% in 2016.44 According to a
new study published by National Bureau of Economic Research
this increased efficiency has allowed
Amazon to reduce prices of products on its portal by as much as
40% over a 10-year time-frame. A
50% reduction in the free shipping threshold from $49 to $25 in
last six months is another testimony
to the immense pricing power which Amazon can draw from its
68. robust supply chain infrastructure.
45 Walmart.com started in 2017 to offer free shipping for any
order above $35.
Amazon is now making in-roads in the global logistics services.
To benefit from the $1 trillion large
cross-border trade, Amazon has initiated a global supply chain
project code named “Dragon Boat.” The
underlying motive of this project is to allow seamless movement
of goods from factories in the East
(China and Southeast Asia) to its customers in the West.46
Another move in this direction was when
in December 2016, Amazon launched a new cargo service,
expanding its transportation from trucks
to airplanes. Amazon leased 40 jets emblazoned with “Prime
Air” to support their holiday season
deliveries, which are usually shipped through FedEx and UPS.
Amazon maintains that this fleet is to
supplement the capacity of the shipping companies, rather than
replace them.47
Amazon’s Corporate Strategy
As the largest comparative-shopping website boasting “Earth’s
largest selection” of consumer goods,
Amazon satisfies the desire of customers to find everything on
their shopping list at one place without
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
69. Amazon.com, Inc.
9
leaving home.48 In addition to the products that Amazon carries
directly, it provides a marketplace
for customers to purchase goods from third-party vendors. The
Amazon Marketplace is a platform on
which any qualified seller can access Amazon customers
globally. About 50% of Amazon’s retail sales
are conducted on its Marketplace. Pursuing its mission of being
the “Earth’s most customer-centric
company,” Amazon excels at customer service. Indeed, a recent
survey ranked Amazon as the most well-
regarded company in the United States.49 The online retailer
pioneered the recommendation system by
which customized suggestions on shopping items, books, music,
and so forth are made to customers
based on their buying patterns, preferences, and characteristics
of their shopping history as well as
that of others with similar profiles. This creates a more
personalized shopping experience, especially
important when transacting online. As a consumer adds items to
their online shopping cart, Amazon
then suggests complementary products, frequently offering a
bundled price at a discount.
Globally, only Alibaba, China’s leading e-commerce
conglomerate, is larger than Amazon. Besides
offering a wide variety of products and services, Amazon also
diversified geographically pretty much
from the outset. Today, Amazon operates country-specific sites
in more than a dozen countries,
including in China (amazon.cn). Currently, Amazon is making a
major push into India (amazon.in),
70. where the domestic Flipkart—started by former Amazon
employees—took an early lead.
In 2011, Amazon launched its own advertising network in order
to generate targeted ads for its
online customers. A customer browsing Amazon for a particular
item but did not end up purchasing
anything was tagged and then served an ad for that particular
item when the customer returned to
shop at a later stage. According to eMarketer, Amazon’s
network generated an estimated $870 million
in ad revenue in 2014, and is forecast to bring in over $1 billion
in 2017.50 Amazon also has plans
to ramp this program up to challenge Google for a larger piece
of the $50 billion-per-year online
advertising market. Under these plans, Amazon is set to use its
customer data to expand its in-house
ad platform (dubbed Amazon Sponsored Links) to ultimately
replace the ads that Google currently
supplies on its website.51
In order to better support online retailing’s competition with
brick-and-mortar retailing, Amazon
recently deployed a pilot program of using robotic sorting in
several of the company’s fulfillment
warehouses during the busy holiday season.52 The initiative
was the culmination of Amazon’s acquisi-
tion of Kiva Systems in 2012 for $775 million and was aimed at
helping Amazon reduce the time taken
to sort and pack goods towards guaranteeing same-day or
overnight deliveries of packages. The use of
10,000 robots might not only offer a competitive edge in terms
of fulfillment, it also has the potential
for Amazon to save between $400 and $900 million. Indeed,
fulfillment costs amounted to $2.6 billion
in the third quarter of 2014, up 30% on the previous quarter.
71. In support of online retailing, Amazon recently opened several
brick-and-mortar stores in the
United States. These physical retail stores serve as yet another
way by which Amazon can touch the
customer. The retail locations enable next day delivery for
many items, pickup of online orders, and
exchange or return purchases.53 In particular, the ability to
return or exchange purchases in person
becomes especially attractive to consumers. Such a service
would negate potential frustration of hav-
ing to repackage a purchase and drop it off for shipping where
there is always the potential for it to
be lost in transit. Moreover, these retail locations also offer
lockers where customers can safely retrieve
their purchases, overcoming the rampant theft problem of items
left at the apartment doors, especially in
metropolitan cities. With the bankruptcy filing of Radio Shack,
there is speculation that Amazon may
acquire Radio Shack’s storefronts as a way to expeditiously
launch into brick-and-mortar retailing in a
widespread and cost-effective way.54 Amazon also announced
that they would open cashier-less grocery
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
10
Amazon.com, Inc.
72. stores under the umbrella Amazon Go in Seattle in December
2016. As customers walk in, they scan
their phones at a kiosk and walk out with items they wish to
purchase which are automatically charged
to their Amazon accounts. The technology relies on video
streaming, computer vision, and sensors that
identify and track customers. Deep-learning algorithms have
faced issues when more than 20 customers
are present, and this issue may set back the launch date for
Amazon Go.55
The company has also moved further up the retail value chain
into the wholesale and distribution
market; a market worth $7.2 trillion. Amazon Business’ ability
to provide a client-friendly interface,
24/7 delivery, and low prices made it a significant competitive
threat to incumbents that were com-
posed primarily of family-run, regional businesses that
emphasized personal interaction in the sales
process.
AWS is viewed as having the potential to eclipse Amazon’s
retail business in revenue in the medium
to long term56 (Exhibit 4). Although exhibiting healthy growth
at an estimated 35 to 40 percent
per year, it is clear that AWS does not have the Infrastructure-
as-a-Service (IaaS) market to itself.
Competition has increased from companies with deep pockets;
in particular, Microsoft’s Azure cloud
service and Google’s Cloud Platform. Other notable competitors
moving in on the IaaS space includes
AliCloud, Verizon, Cisco, IBM, and VMware.57 As a result of
increasing competition, AWS cut prices for
its services, which in turn hurt profits in a unit that has
traditionally enjoyed substantial margins.58
73. Legal Challenges
In 2017, Amazon accounted for more than half of all online
dollars spent in the U.S.59 An increasing
share of this is captured by its private-label brand of products
including everything from batteries
and phone chargers to cotton washcloths, under its Amazon
Basics label. AWS is the world’s largest
cloud computing provider. In the same year, Amazon is
planning to spend twice as much on movie
and TV content than HBO, a premium cable and satellite TV
network owned by Time Warner. (As of
summer 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice is still reviewing
the proposed $85 billion acquisition of
Time Warner by AT&T.) Alexa, the virtual assistant powering
Echo and other devices, is competing for
dominance in the virtual reality space.
With ever increasing scale and scope, Amazon is more likely to
face additional legal challenges in
the future. As such, Amazon’s dominance of the retail space has
not gone without opposition from
traditional retailers. In 2012, several U.S. states passed
legislation mandating that state sales taxes
must be collected for online purchases within state borders. As
a result, Amazon lost part of its pric-
ing advantage and was forced to start collecting sales taxes in
Pennsylvania, Texas, and California. By
2017, the number of states requiring the company to collect
sales taxes was up to 30, in addition to
the District of Columbia.60
Amazon’s presence in book retailing and publishing allowed it
to lock-in even the largest publish-
ing houses to multi-year contracts where Amazon serves as the
74. portal through which books (print
and digital) are marketed and sold.61 This leverage, however,
has not been without controversy, and
is continually scrutinized by the EU Competition watchdog.62
Publishing houses have argued that
Amazon has set book prices below cost for many publishers
(i.e., selling brand-new release of bestsell-
ers as e-book for $9.99, while hardcover books of the same title
were priced at $28.95 at other retailers
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
11
such as Barnes & Noble). In particular, publishers argue that
Amazon’s discount pricing does not take
into account the publisher’s expenses in content development,
editing, and marketing, resulting in
much lower revenues to publishers and, correspondingly, lower
royalties to authors.
A much bigger legal threat is looming on the horizon,
however.63 Amazon now accounts for roughly
one half of all internet retail spending in the United States. In
addition, with AWS, physical retail
stores, and drone deliveries, Amazon is increasingly becoming a
fully vertically- integrated enterprise.
75. Many argue that Amazon is much like a utility, providing the
backbone for Internet commerce, both
in the business-to-consumer (B2C) as well as in the business-to-
business (B2B) space.64 This paints a
future picture in which rivals are depending more and more on
Amazon’s products and services to
conduct their own business. Amazon’s tremendous scale can
bring it increasingly into conflict with
governments. Antitrust enforcers in the U.S. such as the
Department of Justice might train their sights
onto Amazon.
Competitors and Industry Convergence
Although Jeff Bezos claims to think of customers only, and as
such, urges Amazon’s employees to
have an obsessive customer focus, the list of competitors
included in the company’s annual filings is
getting longer and longer.65 It features not only retailers in
their various forms (online, offline, and
multi-channels), publishers, film producers, distributors, but
also online search engines and compa-
nies that design, manufacture, market, and sell
telecommunications and electronic devices, as well as
logistics and advertising companies.66
Amazon has continued to morph through vertical integration and
continued diversification in
products, services, activities, and geographies. Amazon started
out as an online book retailer but
has grown into a massive discount internet vendor, streaming
multimedia, offering cloud computing
services (AWS), and manufacturing its own electronics and
telecommunication devices (e.g., Kindle
and Alexa line of products). However, its ability to innovate
and cultivate business around activities
76. that are not necessarily traditional core competencies has also
pitted the company against some
formidable competitors. Indeed, Amazon’s innovation and
expansion into other lucrative areas of the
technology industry has been part of a broader convergence of
industries previously the sole domain
of companies like Alphabet (Google’s parent), Microsoft, and
Apple.
Apple is the world’s largest vendor of digital media (iTunes)
and a highly successful mobile device
manufacturer (iPhone, iPod, iPad). Likewise, Google began as a
search engine, but has similarly
branched out into hardware (smartphones, Google Glass—
though this was abandoned in 2015), mobile
operating systems (Android), content delivery (Google Play,
youTube), internet browsing and search
(Chrome), web applications (Google suite of application
programs, Google Drive), cloud computing (Google
Cloud), and social networking (Google+), albeit hardly a
success. Facebook is the world’s largest social
networking site (some two billion users globally), but it has
also moved to a more mobile-oriented
approach by developing advertising and apps specifically for
mobile devices as well as live streaming
video. Underscoring the innovation of these companies is the
push to win the race to develop a truly
integrative online ecosystem for consumers, which will grant
them proprietary access to consumers’
data—and their wallets and those of advertisers.67
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
77. 2019.
12
Amazon.com, Inc.
Finally, added to this complex competitive dynamic is the
meteoric rise of Alibaba, the Chinese
internet giant that is able to compete directly with Amazon’s
online retailing.68 Exhibit 6 compares
key 2016 financial data for Amazon, Alibaba, Alphabet,
Microsoft, and Walmart. The first four are
also among the top ten largest tech companies in the world by
market cap (Exhibit 7). With a market
cap of some $450 billion (in spring 2017), Amazon is one of the
top-five most valuable technology
companies in the world, besides Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft,
and Facebook (in rank order). Exhibit 8
depicts a comparison of the normalized share prices of Amazon,
Alibaba, Alphabet, Microsoft, and
Walmart over time.
ALPHABET
Under the Alphabet corporate umbrella, Google (GOOG), the
search giant, has been a prominent
competitor to as well as collaborator with Amazon. For
instance, Amazon’s tablets run on the Android
operating system. Moreover, Amazon also sells Google products
on its website (including Chrome
Cast and Nexus devices).
Google, for its part, has made significant inroads into the
mobile software technology space previ-
78. ously dominated by Apple. Since the company acquired the
Android open-source mobile platform in
2005, it has iteratively improved on the operating system such
that by 2017, Android was the operating
system (OS) employed by more than 80% of phones
worldwide.69 The most popular of these by far has
been the Samsung Galaxy line, whose brand recognition has
eclipsed that of Android since 2011.70
To be sure, the combination of Google software and Samsung
hardware has produced a smartphone
that has posed the greatest threat to Apple’s traditional
dominance of the smartphone space. Although
Apple holds less than 20% market share with its iOS mobile
operating system, it does capture most of the
profits generated in the smartphone industry.
Google itself tried its hand in producing its own phone through
its acquisition of Motorola Mobility
for $12.5 billion in 2012.71 72 However, the endeavor lasted all
of 22 months as Google offloaded the
handset business to Lenovo in January 2014 for the modest
price of $3 billion, while retaining Motorola
Mobility’s patents. In particular, Google was able to maintain
control of the more than 17,000 patents
that were acquired in the 2012 deal, protecting handset
manufacturers using the Android operat-
ing system against patent infringement.73 In October 2016,
Google launched the Google Pixel XL, its
second attempt at a smartphone, and is expected to sell nine
million smartphones in the first year.74
Google has likewise made inroads in the tablet business. The
company has adapted the Android
OS for use in tablets; in July 2012, it launched the Nexus 7,
manufactured in partnership with Asus,
79. and in November 2012, the 10-inch version (Nexus 10),
manufactured by Samsung.75 Android-based
tablets tend to be smaller and cheaper than their Apple
counterparts, as well as more customizable to
user specifications.76 As a result, their popularity with
consumers grew rapidly: By 2013, more than
half of all tablets shipped were Android-based.77 Consequently,
Android tablets overtook the iPad in
popularity by the end of 2013. Indeed, Android tablet sales were
estimated at 120.9 million units for
2013, equivalent to almost 62% of the market, whereas iPad
sales accounted for 70.4 million units, or
36%.78 79 With the addition of the Google Chromebook to the
tablet family, Google has been able to
make further gains on Apple. The laptop lookalike is affordable,
boots up in seconds, and comes with
Google’s most popular apps pre-installed, which are free and
remotely run. This cloud-based func-
tionality limits the Chromebook in a home or business setting
given that it requires perpetual con-
nection to broadband internet. However, in an education setting,
the Chromebook has quickly gained
traction as a cost-effective alternative to iPads and laptops, both
of which ideally require the student
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
80. 13
to have their own device, and for productivity software to be
purchased. The cloud-based nature of the
Chromebook means that students, particularly those at schools,
can use any Chromebook to access
their work, returning the device at the end of the class for the
next student’s use.80 81 Google’s online
portal, Google Play, rivals Apple’s iTunes as a means by which
to provide an ecosystem to Android
users where games, apps, music, and much more can be
accessed. The Play Store has 2.6 million apps
on offer to customers as opposed to iTunes 2.2 million apps,
and in 2013, for the first time ever, app
downloads from the Play Store outstripped downloads from the
Apple App Store.82
Google has gone on to innovate on the use of its legendary
search engine, evolving to offer more
content for consumers. Traditionally, Google wanted users “out
of Google and to the right place as
fast as possible.” Now, Google is offering reviews, photos, and
other content that keep browsers on the
Google page longer, transforming its core business into one that
adds value via enhanced content.
To better compete with Amazon, Google is also planning a
deeper dive into online commerce with
its “buy” button, a tool expected to behave much like Amazon’s
one-click ordering feature. Google
is adding the buy button to its promoted mobile search results
which will redirect customers to a
purchase page. The merchants will still handle actual product
fulfillment, although the page will be hosted
by Google.83 Such efforts are intended to streamline Internet
shopping by deterring consumers from
81. switching their searches from Google to Amazon.84
To further compete with Apple and Amazon, Google launched
its own TV set-top box in mid-2014.
The company already had Chromecast, its own dongle-based
devices for TV, which allows users to
stream content from the internet using smartphones, tablets, and
computers—all while running Google
Chrome and using the browser as a remote control.85 The set-
top box introduction was Google’s
attempt to gain a larger slice of the growing TV-streaming pie
for which it competed with Apple and
Amazon.
Finally, Google has signaled an ambition far beyond that of
search engines, operating systems, cloud
computing, mobile devices, and so forth. The company appears
to be positioning itself to not only
offer its current plethora of services, but also to have a major
role in how those services are delivered
through Google Fiber and its push to sell wireless service direct
to consumers. Google Fi is the com-
pany’s attempt to provide fast, cost-effective internet services
and circumvent the traditional broad-
band providers. By rolling out high-speed internet services to
the geographic areas that most demand
it, the company is redefining how broadband internet services
are offered. Traditionally, rollouts were
completed by the likes of AT&T or Comcast by blanketing
entire cities, not just distinct geographic
areas where demand for such infrastructure was highest.86 In
the area of wireless, Google has struck
deals with Sprint and T-Mobile to resell service on their
networks, allowing the company to push wire-
less service under its own name. In addition, using proprietary
technology, Google Fi stitches together
82. free broadband wireless connection by leveraging
complementary hotspots offered in places such as
Starbucks and elsewhere. Google Fi is likely to not only
improve speeds but also lead to price cuts in
an industry that is already experiencing tremendous downward
pressures on prices.87
ALIBABA
The Alibaba Group is China’s largest e-commerce company, and
one of the largest tech companies
globally.88 In particular, Alibaba is a family of e-commerce
businesses, which The Wall Street Journal
described as “comparable to eBay, Amazon, and PayPal all
rolled into one, with a stake in Twitter-like
Weibo thrown in to boot.”89 Alibaba’s main trading platforms
are Taobao and Tmall, which handle
more transactions each year than Amazon and eBay
combined.90
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
14
Amazon.com, Inc.
Alibaba was founded by Jack Ma, an English teacher in the city
of Hangzhou (in close proximity to
Shanghai), and struggled to gain traction and the attention of
83. investors in its early days.91 92 Since then,
the company has gone on to dominate Chinese e-commerce with
more than 600 million subscribers,
more than 80% share of the country’s e-commerce market, and
annual transactions to the tune of half
a billion dollars. Despite all its success in China, the company
is still largely unknown in the Western
world. Its market leadership is intrinsically tied to the portal’s
success in breaking through the myriad
of barriers that exist in China when it comes to trade and
establishing a platform where buyers and
sellers can confidently and efficiently transact.93 For example,
Alibaba was able to overcome China’s
low-trust business environment by introducing a set of country-
specific innovations. As an example,
Alipay, Alibaba’s online payment platform, holds a buyer’s
payment in escrow until the buyer indicates
satisfaction with the merchandise received.
On September 19, 2014, Alibaba went public on the New york
Stock Exchange (NySE). It had the
most successful initial public offering ever, surpassing a stock
market valuation of over $230 billion
on its first day of trading. By summer 2017, Alibaba’s market
cap stands at a record high of $320
billion by summer 2017, making it one of the most valuable tech
companies globally. In comparison,
Amazon’s market cap was some $465 billion at the same time.
In 2017, Alibaba employed around
50,000 people, had $23 billion in revenues, and remained highly
profitable, capturing more than 50
percent of its revenues as profits. In the same year, Alibaba’s
marketplaces in China reported sales
of some $550 billion.
Exclusively a trading platform for third party vendors, Alibaba
does not hold or own any inventory,
84. unlike Amazon. Alibaba’s main source of revenue is the
transaction fees, listing fees, and the ad-revenues
it generates from more than 10 million active sellers across its
marketplaces. In contrast to Amazon,
Alibaba does not carry nor own any inventory, it is an open
online trading platform. This asset-light
model of Alibaba means that it has more room to push down
prices on its platform by reducing
transaction costs for its sellers. As both Alibaba and Amazon
focus on a cost leadership strategy, the
agility of Alibaba to reduce prices due to its asset-light model
could turn out to be a competitive
advantage for the Chinese firm.
The Alibaba Group comprises four primary portals: Taobao,
Tmall, Alibaba.com, and Aliyun (now
AliCloud). Among the four portals are hundreds of millions of
users accessing the sites, and millions
of businesses relying on the portals to connect them with
potential buyers. Taobao is Alibaba’s flag-
ship online marketplace, a consumer-to-consumer retail
platform with seven million sellers offering
over 800 million items.
The company’s Q1 (first quarter) report of 2016 highlighted just
how popular and successful
Taobao is: It generated some $450 billion in gross merchandise
volume.95 Tmall, by contrast, is a
business-to-consumer retail platform that was spun out of
Taobao in 2011. This portal generated over
$120 billion in gross merchandise volume, approximately half
that of Taobao. Alibaba.com is engaged
in wholesale business-to-business e-commerce, but it generates
far lower transaction volumes than
Taobao and Tmall.96
85. In 2009, Alibaba launched Single’s Day, similar to Amazon
Prime Day, held on 11 November (11/11)
every year. Similar to Cyber Monday in the U.S. (the Monday
following Thanksgiving, with exceptional
online bargains), Alibaba offers special 24 hour sales online. In
2016, Single’s Day generate $18 billion in
revenue for the ecommerce giant.97
Critical to the success of Alibaba’s e-commerce is the
company’s ability to engender confidence in
transacting online. In particular, the company’s Alipay service
was instrumental in that it possible for
consumers to put money in escrow, allowing buyers to verify
any purchased goods before releasing
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
15
money to the seller. In this way, the company overcame China’s
notoriously weak consumer protec-
tion laws and brought confidence to the online e-commerce
market. Launched in 2004, and spun out
of Alibaba as Ant Financial in 2011, the former Alipay has
grown tremendously, and by 2014 con-
trolled half of China’s online payment market.98 In China, Ant
Financial offers a wide range of services
86. including banking and investments as well as the country’s first
credit-scoring offering. In China, Ant
Financial has some 500 million customers, and is rapidly
expanding internationally.99 Ant Financial
is preparing to IPO in the near future with a valuation north of
$60 billion.
100
Alibaba’s meteoric growth also includes significant investments
in Sina Weibo (China’s version of
Twitter), yoku Todou (China’s version of youTube), and Kuaidi
Dache (a taxi hailing app similar to
Uber).101 AliCloud, the firm’s lesser known cloud service
offering, is Alibaba’s alternative to Amazon
Web Services. While it was only 3% of the 2016 total revenues,
it has been experiencing some 130%
year-on-year growth in 2016.
102
As Alibaba tries to expand globally, AliCloud agreed to a 12-
year partnership with the International
Olympic Committee (IOC) in 2017 during Jack Ma’s visit at the
World Economic Forum in Davos,
Switzerland. Following a meeting with President Trump, Jack
Ma promised to create one million jobs
in the United States and open up opportunities for small- and
medium-sized U.S. firms to sell their
products and services in China.103 It is also worth noting that
China’s protectionist government, cul-
ture, and scale raises formidable barriers to entry for any
foreign market entrants, such as Amazon.
MICROSOFT
87. Founded in 1975, Microsoft Corporation is headquartered in
Redmond, Washington, a suburb of
Seattle, and Amazon’s home town. It also produces a wide range
of software and hardware products
ranging from its search engine (Bing), to tablet computers
(Microsoft Surface), and video game consoles
(Xbox, Xbox One, and Xbox 360). In the early decades of the
PC revolution, Microsoft was the undis-
puted leader. With its Windows operating system, Microsoft set
the standard in the world of personal
computers. Some 90 percent of all PCs run Windows. Once
users were locked into Windows, which
generally comes pre-loaded with the computer they purchased,
they then wanted to buy applications
that run seamlessly with the operating system. The obvious
choice for users is Microsoft’s Office
Suite (containing Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and other
software programs). Microsoft’s business
model was to create a large installed base of users for its PC
operating system and then make money
from selling application software such as its ubiquitous Office
Suite.
Microsoft then went on to replicate with its corporate customers
this hugely successful business
model of setting the standard in operating systems combined
with bundling discounted applica-
tion suites. Once servers became ubiquitous in corporations,
Microsoft offered IT department e-mail
systems, databases, and other business applications that were
tightly integrated with Windows. As a
consequence, some 80 percent of Microsoft’s revenues were
either tied directly or indirectly to its
Windows franchise.104 Microsoft’s strategy of focusing on
setting the industry standard allowed it
to create a strong strategic position and to extract high profits
88. for many years. Microsoft’s bundling
strategy with Office, combining different application services
that run seamlessly in one discounted
product offering, allowed Microsoft to overtake IBM, once the
most valuable tech company. By 2000,
Microsoft was the most valuable company globally with some
$510 billion in market capitalization.
Given Microsoft’s lackluster performance since 2000, however,
the once dominant company has
been in turnaround mode. In 2010, Microsoft marked its entry
into the cloud computing business
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
16
Amazon.com, Inc.
with Azure. Microsoft has been a known presence with
corporations due to their standard offerings
of Microsoft Office, SQL Server, and Windows Server. In 2014,
Satya Nadella was appointed CEO to
reposition Microsoft for future success. The new CEO did not
waste any time. Satya Nadella’s strate-
gic focus shifted to move Microsoft away from its Windows-
only business model to compete more
effectively in a “mobile-first, cloud-first world,” the mantra he
used in his appointment e-mail as CEO.
89. Holding a press briefing a few weeks later, Satya Nadella
demonstrated new apps for Microsoft Office
for the iOS and Android ecosystems powered by the cloud. The
push for OneDrive – cloud storage
of documents that can be accessed from any device – along with
Office 365 is expected to grow
the one billion Microsoft Office users by placing Azure at the
center of the ecosystem.105
What was
once known as the cloud for running .NET applications, Azure
has transformed itself into an open
infrastructure service for enterprises.
106
Office 365, Microsoft’s cloud-based software offering, is now
available as a subscription service. Software applications can be
accessed on any device, anytime,
with online storage, combined with Skype’s global calling
feature. Windows and Office, however, are
still generating 40% of revenues and some 75% of profits, but
both continue to decline. The problem
Microsoft faces is that the gross margin of “classic” PC-based
Office is an astronomical 90% (due to
Microsoft’s “monopoly” position), while the gross margin for
Office 365 is only around 50%. The cloud
computing space with Amazon, Alphabet (Google), Apple, IBM,
and others is also fiercely competitive.
As a direct competitor to Amazon Web Services, Azure’s cloud
computing business jumped 93% on
a year-over-year basis and is expected to generate $14 billion
annually.107 Satya Nadella believes that
90. Azure’s key differentiator of providing Software-as-a-Service
(SAAS) and Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS)
offerings will help it combat rival AWS.108
WALMART
Walart Stores Inc., doing business as Walmart, is a
multinational retail corporation that oper-
ates a chain of hypermarkets, discount department stores, and
grocery stores. As of December 2016,
Walmart operates some 12,000 stores in 28 different countries,
with roughly one half of all stores in
the U.S.109 Walmart also owns and operates Sam’s Club, which
is a membership-only, retail warehouse
club. With revenues of some $500 billion, the largest retailer in
the United States competes head-on
with Amazon’s e-commerce business.
To compete with e-commerce vendors more effectively,
Walmart launched Walmart.com that allows
users to order products online, view availability at nearby
stores, and get same-day pickup from stores.
To compete with Amazon Prime, Walmart launched The
Walmart Shipping Pass (in 2016) that pro-
vided free shipping on products with a $49 annual membership
fee. The minimum amount for free
shipping was set at $49 per transaction and shipping took
anywhere from 5–7 days. In January 2017,
Walmart announced that they are discontinuing the Shipping
Pass program to provide free two-day
shipping to all customers on qualifying orders of at least $35.
The membership fee has been dropped
and all existing customers of the Shipping Pass have been
refunded their membership fee. The new
program includes over two million items that local Walmart
stores carry.110
91. In August 2016, Walmart acquired e-commerce startup Jet.com
for $3 billion in cash and $300 mil-
lion in Walmart shares. The acquisition will help build on and
complement the foundation to serve
customers better through the Walmart app, and position the
company for faster e-commerce growth.
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
17
Jet.com is an e-commerce newcomer boasting two-day delivery
for orders over $35. Their motto states
that their “prices drop as you shop,” providing discounts for
larger purchases. All grocery items are
available on Jet.com and they claim to appropriately pack
frozen and perishable products to keep
them cold even if the recipient isn’t home for the delivery. Jet
is expected to reach a $1 billion run
rate within the first year, with an expected monthly user base
growth of 400,000 customers and 25,000
daily processed order.111
Where to Next?
As Jeff Bezos prepared for the following day’s meeting with
92. executives and investors the following
morning, he thought about Amazon’s plans for the near future.
Bezos knew what it was like both to
disrupt business, and to be disrupted. He had no doubt that
while short-term results were by no means
stellar, long-term results would prove that Amazon’s disruption
of tech giants like Apple, Alphabet,
and Microsoft was the right strategy. Moreover, he worried
about international growth, and the impact
of Alibaba. While Amazon was once a student of Walmart’s
logistic system, now the Arkansas-based
retail giant seems to be on the rebound as it is investing heavily
in its online offerings and is taking on
Amazon directly. In addition, Walmart is experimenting with a
hybrid, omni-channel approach (order
online, pick up in store) that poses a potential threat to Amazon.
yet, he still wrestled with the question of, where to next? And
how would he and the executive team
manage the expectations of investors who were pressuring the
company to focus on profitability, and
to consider spinning out AWS as a separate business. Bezos had
always maintained, “If we [at Amazon]
could find something differentiated that we thought customers
would like, it would be super fun.”112
He had already started drone-based delivery, brick-and-mortar
stores, and one-hour delivery, but
how would Amazon fit all of its innovations in its product mix?
How would Amazon’s wide-ranging
and powerful rivals respond to the company’s innovations? And
more importantly, would customers
be receptive to the company’s innovation and differentiation,
and help calm investor skepticism of
Amazon’s strategy?
93. For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
18
Amazon.com, Inc.
Source: Depiction of publicly available data.
EXHIBIT 1 Amazon’s Revenue, Net Income, and Operating
Expenses ($ million), 1996–2016
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
0
94. 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Revenue Operating Expenses Net Income
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
19
EXHIBIT 2 Amazon Key Events and Market Capitalization ($
billion), 1994–2017
Source: Depiction of publicly available data.
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
95. 150
100
50
0
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
2016 2018
Jul 1994
Jeff Bezos Conceives
of Amazon
Jul 1995
First Book
Sold
Sep 1997
One-Click
Shopping
Launched
Oct 1998
First International Sites: .co.uk and
.de (United Kingdom, Germany)
Mar 2000
Dot Com Bubble Bursts
Nov 2000
Marketplace
Launched
Mar 2006
96. Amazon Web
Services (AWS)
Launch
Nov 2007
First Kindle
e-Reader
Mar 2012
Kiva Systems Aquired
(Warehouse Robotics
Company)
Sep 2011
Kindle Fire Tablet
Goes on Sale
Dec 2013
Prototype Drone
Delivery
Dec 2016
First Drone Delivery
Aug 2007
Amazon Fresh Grocery
Service Launched in Seattle
May 1997
Initial Public
Offering (IPO)
Nov 2010
Launch of “Price Check”
Barcode Reader App
97. Dec 2003
First profitable year
Feb 2005
Prime
Membership
Opens
Dec 2016
AmazonGo Prototype
Jan 2017
Air Cargo Hub in Kentucky
Feb 2015
AmazonCampus
Nov 2014
Amazon Echo
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
20
Amazon.com, Inc.
EXHIBIT 3 Normalized Stock Performance of Amazon vs.
NASDAQ-100 Index
(in percentage points), 2007–2017
98. Source: Depiction of publicly available data.
2,500%
2,000%
1,500%
1,000%
500%
0%
-500%
Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13 Jan 14 Jan 15
Jan 16 Jan 17
Amazon
NASDAQ-100 Index
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
21
99. EXHIBIT 4 Amazon Web Services (AWS) Quarterly Net Sales
($ billion), 2014–2016
Source: Depiction of publicly available data.
$4.00
$3.50
$3.00
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$0.00
1.05 1.01
1.17
1.42
1.57
1.82
2.09
2.41
2.57
100. 2.89
Q1’14 Q2’14 Q3’14 Q4’14 Q1’15 Q2’15 Q3’15 Q4’15 Q1’16
Q2’16 Q3’16 Q4’16
3.23
3.54
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
22
Amazon.com, Inc.
EXHIBIT 5 Amazon’s Key Financial Data ($ millions, except
EPS data), 2012–2016
Fiscal Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cash and short-term investments 11,448 12,447 17,416 19,808
25,981
Receivables (total) 3,817 4,767 5,612 5,654 8,339
Inventories (total) 6,031 7,411 8,299 10,243 11,461
Property, plant, and equipment (net total) 7,060 10,949 16,967
21,838 29,114
101. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization (accumulated) 2,522
3,860 5,763 8,215 13,327
Assets (total) 32,555 40,159 54,505 64,747 83,402
Accounts payable (trade) 13,318 15,133 16,459 20,397 25,309
Long-term debt 3,084 3,191 8,265 8,227 7,694
Liabilities (total) 24,363 30,413 43,764 51,363 64,117
Stockholders’ equity (total) 8,192 9,746 10,741 13,384 19,285
Sales (net) 61,093 74,452 88,988 107,006 135,987
Cost of goods sold 45,971 54,181 62,752 71,651 88,265
Selling, general, and administrative expense 9,723 12,847
16,650 20,411 27,284
Income taxes 693 317 483 869 1,671
Income before extraordinary items -39 274 -241 596 2,371
Net income (loss) -39 274 -241 596 2,371
Earnings per share (basic) excluding extraordinary items -0.09
0.6 -0.52 1.28 5.01
Earnings per share (diluted) excluding extraordinary items -0.09
0.59 -0.52 1.25 4.9
Source: Tabulation of publicly available data from Amazon
Annual Reports, multiple years.
102. For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
23
EXHIBIT 6 Key Financial Metrics of Amazon, Alibaba,*
Alphabet, Microsoft, and Walmart
($ billion, as of December 31, 2016)
Source: Depiction of publicly available data.
* Alibaba releases annual reports in March.
$600
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
$0
Amazon Alibaba Alphabet Microsoft Walmart
103. Revenue Operating Expenses Gross Profit
135.99
15.9
90.27 85.32
482.13
43.54
5.93
31.42 32.36
97.04
47.72
10.5
55.13 52.54
121.15
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
24
Amazon.com, Inc.
104. EXHIBIT 7 Market Capitalization of Top-5 Tech Firms and
Walmart
($ billion, as of December 31, 2016)
Source: Depiction of publicly available data.
$700
$600
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
$0
W
alm
ar
t
Am
az
on
Fa
ce
106. This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
Amazon.com, Inc.
25
EXHIBIT 8 Stock Price Comparison: Amazon, Alibaba,
Alphabet, Microsoft, and Walmart
(in percentage points), 2014–2017
Source: Depiction of publicly available data.
160%
140%
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
20%
107. -40%
Jul 14 Oct 14 Jan 15 Apr 15 Jul 15 Oct 15 Jan 16 Apr 16 Jul 16
Oct 16 Jan 17
Amazon
Alibaba
Alphabet Walmart
Microsoft
No
rm
ali
ze
d
Pe
rc
en
ta
ge
C
ha
ng
e
in
S
108. to
ck
P
ric
e
For the exclusive use of j. fan, 2018.
This document is authorized for use only by jingyi fan in Fall
2018 Quantitative & Qualitative Decision Making taught by
VLADIMIR ZLATEV, Boston University from Sep 2018 to Feb
2019.
26
Amazon.com, Inc.
Endnotes
1 “Markets Data on Amazon,” Financial Times, January 27,
2017.
2 S. Fiegerman, “Amazon Stock Tanks After Disappointing
Profit”, CNN tech, last modified October 28, 2016,
http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/27/technology/amazon-
earnings/index.html.
3 G. B. Knecht, “ Wall Street Whiz Found a Niche Selling
Books on the Internet,” Wall Street Journal, updated
May 16, 1996,
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB832204437381952500.
109. 4 The case author bought his first book on Amazon during its
early days. He was amazed at how smooth the
transaction went, and was pleasantly surprised to receive
personalized emails from Amazon’s customer service
reps.
5 G. B. Knecht, “ Wall Street Whiz Found a Niche Selling
Books on the Internet,” Wall Street Journal, updated
May 16, 1996,
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB832204437381952500.
6 “Amazon.com, History,” Hoovers.com, accessed June 14,
2017, http://bit.ly/yf6xZj.
7 “Amazon.com Splits Stock, Makes Acquisitions,” Reuters
News, April 27, 1998.
8 “Amazon.com, History,” Hoovers.com, accessed June 14,
2017, http://bit.ly/yf6xZj.
9 G. Wiles, “Amazon.com to Acquire China’s Joyo.com for $75
Million,” Bloomberg, August 19, 2004 2004, http://
bloom.bg/13SHPx5.
10 C. Loterina, “Netflix vs Amazon Prime Video: Which
Streaming Service is Better for 2017”, Techtimes, last
modified January 2, 2017,
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/190956/20170102/netflix-vs-
amazon-prime-video-
which-streaming-service-is-better-for-2017-and-onward.htm.
11 G. Bensinger, “Amazon to Begin Producing, Acquiring
Original Movies,”
Wall Street Journal, last modified January 19, 2015,
https://www.wsj.com/articles/
amazon-to-begin-producing-acquiring-original-movies-