GEORGES SEURAT
A STUDY OF
HIS COLOURS
THE ARTIST OF THE 19TH CENTURY
GS
01
GS
02
Seurat learnt about the colour theory from
Michel-Eugene Chevreul, a French chemist
and Ogden Rood, a New York physicist.
In a study of Optical Mixture, Rood had con-
cluded that painters should not mix their col-
ours too much but should, whenever possible,
juxtapose pure, unmixed pigments.
Most importantly, Rood discovered what we
know of today as complementary colours. It
can increase the effect of colour in a painting
to the highest degree of luminosity: an effect
Seurat sought to achieve across all his works.
GS
03
“I want to make modern people, in their
essential traits, move about as they do on
those Greek friezes, and place them on
canvases organised by harmonies of colour,
by directions of the tones in harmony with
the lines, and by the directions of the line.”
— Seurat explaining his goal to the critic,
Gustave Kahn in 1888 —
GS
04
LA GRANDE JATTE
GS
05
La Grande Jatte was a very popular island destination on Sundays.
All of Paris would flock here for
a stroll or enjoy a canoe trip.
But, it was also a “Modern Cythera” — a love island
for rendezvous between city men & loose women.
It was a painting in which Seurat had
gathered the Parisian middle classes.
What looked like a simple composition,
was actually the amalgamation of
different scientific research studies
about colours.
Although there are white highlights
distributed across the entire painting,
the viewer is particularly drawn to
the little girl dressed in white in the
middle.
As a colour, white stands out at the
centre of all the colours: the prismatic
colours are born of white light and can
revert to white light.
Newton discovered it, Seurat applied
it to his painting.
Seurat, a Neo-Impressionist painter,
lends his figures a 3-dimensionality
new to the Impressionists.
He achieves this by giving the figures
aureoles & via the carefully calculated
contrast of light & dark between
figures and background.
What seems a fleeting moment
captured on a Sunday afternoon is
in fact, isolated from time — with the
exception of a girl skipping in the right
half of the scene.
The patch of lawn in the shade reflects
the colours of the grass, but also has
Orange dots: influence of the sun
Purple dots: the complementary
colour of green
The colours reunite on the retina:
hence it is no longer a mixture of
pigmentcoloursbutinstead,amixture
of variously coloured rays of light.
GS
09
Seurat separates the colour of an object into
its local colour and the colour of light, which
in this painting, is orange, as can be seen from
the dots of orange-yellow distributed through-
out the painting.
Seurat avoids strong contrasts of colour. Only
the tonal interplay of red/green and blue/or-
ange is apparent, richly nuanced throughout
the painting.
THUS,
these colours and the changes in an object’s
colour, as precipitated by the light are broken
down into individual dots, to be reunited in
colour as an “Optical Mixture” in the eye.
GS
11
Seurat’s method was called,
Pointillism.
This elaborate painting technique was intend-
ed to let more light into the picture and offer
a scientifically-based response to the Impres-
sionists’ spontaneous approach to painting.
Pointillism is only genuinely effective when we
alternate close-up and distant viewing to cre-
ate a type of vibration in the colours.
GS
12
EVENING, HONFLEUR
GS
13
Following his debut of La Grande Jatte at the
Impressionist Exhibition in 1886, Seurat spent
the summer painting along the Channel coast
of the port city of Honfleur.
He loved the pearly light that dissolved solid
forms when he was looking at the sea, hence
he reduced his palette, from red/orange and
green/blue to the colour tan, aquamarine, blue
and lavender.
The evening sun is filling the pic-
ture with a warm, refracted light, with
which the varied nuances of colour
accord.
Dark blue banks of cloud with dots
the colour of tan thrusts their way
into the expansive yellow sky from
the right.
The few solid objects in the picture,
such as the piles and rock in the
foreground, combine effectively into
a calmly structured rhythm.
GS
17
most importantly,
an important innovation in Evening, Honfluer is
the painted frame which surrounds the compo-
sition. Seurat had begun to add painted frames
executed directly onto the canvas.
Yet another instance of his continual search to
refine his technique, the painted borders con-
sists of small strokes of colour that responds
as complements to the hues in the composi-
tion.
GS
18
Evening, Honfleur, is the timeless poetry of the
sea which the Symbolist writers so greatly ad-
mired.
Seurat’s seascapes are marked by serene tran-
quility and an all-permeating light. He was
interested in neither the hustle & bustle of
the ports, nor in the colourful scenes on the
beaches. Instead, he turned his attention to
the diverse moods created by the constantly
changing light over the sea.
Paul Adam, a Symbolist poet, described it as,
“An orchestra of symphonic
dabs of colour”
GS
19
in a nutshell,
Seurat understood how to classically com-
pose a major work, yet uses new techniques
whilst doing so.
He was a Neo-Impressionist because despite
painting everyday life, he painted them in a
large scale format. He also used earth pig-
ments: ochres and browns long frowned upon
by the Impressionists and they lend the pic-
ture a soft & muted harmony.
GS
20
The previously sketchy
Impressionist effect has
been transmuted into a
depiction of great calm,
harmony and well-thought
out order.
GS
21
Seurat is the artist of the
19th century because
his paintings
provided inspiration
to the contemporaries of
his time, such as:
PAUL SIGNAC
HENRI CROSS
CAMILLE
PISSARRO
HENRI MATISSE
GS
22
Georges-Pierre Seurat
Futurism + Cubism
They all bear witness in
the absolute value placed
upon abstract cultural
imperatives to their
great predecessor,
Georges Seurat.
Henri Matisse
ABSTRACTION
Robert Delaunay
Oskar Schlemmer
Piet Mondrian
De Stijl
GS
23
Seurat had a ripple effect:
he served as an
inspiration not only to
artists, but to writers as well.
He was a precursor to Art
Nouveau and Art Deco.
GS
24
Seurat’s technique still lives
in contemporary today:
YAYOI KUSAMA
MIGUEL
ENDARA
CHRISTIAN
FAUR
GS
25
“How unfair people are about Seurat!
They refuse to recognise him as one of the
geniuses of our century! He was interested in
everything and achieved definitive results in
the fields of black and white drawing,
the harmony of lines, of composition,
of contrast, and the harmony of colour...
and even in that of the frame.
What more can one ask of an artist?”
— Paul Signac, in a tribute to Seurat
which he wrote in his journal —
GS
25
GEORGES-PIERRE
SEURAT
1859 — 1891
GS
26
BIBLIOGRAPHY
	 Salvesen, B. (2004) Seurat and the Making of “La Grande
Jatte.” The Art Institute of Chicago
	 Duchting, H. (2000) Seurat. Taschen
	 Foa, M. (2005) Georges Seurat: The Art of Vision. Yale Uni-
versity Press
	 Smith, P. (1997) Seurat and the Avant-Garde. Yale University
Press.

Seurat_File(Complete)

  • 1.
  • 2.
    A STUDY OF HISCOLOURS THE ARTIST OF THE 19TH CENTURY GS 01
  • 3.
    GS 02 Seurat learnt aboutthe colour theory from Michel-Eugene Chevreul, a French chemist and Ogden Rood, a New York physicist. In a study of Optical Mixture, Rood had con- cluded that painters should not mix their col- ours too much but should, whenever possible, juxtapose pure, unmixed pigments. Most importantly, Rood discovered what we know of today as complementary colours. It can increase the effect of colour in a painting to the highest degree of luminosity: an effect Seurat sought to achieve across all his works.
  • 4.
    GS 03 “I want tomake modern people, in their essential traits, move about as they do on those Greek friezes, and place them on canvases organised by harmonies of colour, by directions of the tones in harmony with the lines, and by the directions of the line.” — Seurat explaining his goal to the critic, Gustave Kahn in 1888 —
  • 5.
  • 7.
    GS 05 La Grande Jattewas a very popular island destination on Sundays. All of Paris would flock here for a stroll or enjoy a canoe trip. But, it was also a “Modern Cythera” — a love island for rendezvous between city men & loose women. It was a painting in which Seurat had gathered the Parisian middle classes. What looked like a simple composition, was actually the amalgamation of different scientific research studies about colours.
  • 8.
    Although there arewhite highlights distributed across the entire painting, the viewer is particularly drawn to the little girl dressed in white in the middle. As a colour, white stands out at the centre of all the colours: the prismatic colours are born of white light and can revert to white light. Newton discovered it, Seurat applied it to his painting.
  • 10.
    Seurat, a Neo-Impressionistpainter, lends his figures a 3-dimensionality new to the Impressionists. He achieves this by giving the figures aureoles & via the carefully calculated contrast of light & dark between figures and background.
  • 12.
    What seems afleeting moment captured on a Sunday afternoon is in fact, isolated from time — with the exception of a girl skipping in the right half of the scene.
  • 14.
    The patch oflawn in the shade reflects the colours of the grass, but also has Orange dots: influence of the sun Purple dots: the complementary colour of green The colours reunite on the retina: hence it is no longer a mixture of pigmentcoloursbutinstead,amixture of variously coloured rays of light.
  • 16.
    GS 09 Seurat separates thecolour of an object into its local colour and the colour of light, which in this painting, is orange, as can be seen from the dots of orange-yellow distributed through- out the painting. Seurat avoids strong contrasts of colour. Only the tonal interplay of red/green and blue/or- ange is apparent, richly nuanced throughout the painting.
  • 17.
    THUS, these colours andthe changes in an object’s colour, as precipitated by the light are broken down into individual dots, to be reunited in colour as an “Optical Mixture” in the eye.
  • 19.
    GS 11 Seurat’s method wascalled, Pointillism. This elaborate painting technique was intend- ed to let more light into the picture and offer a scientifically-based response to the Impres- sionists’ spontaneous approach to painting. Pointillism is only genuinely effective when we alternate close-up and distant viewing to cre- ate a type of vibration in the colours.
  • 20.
  • 22.
    GS 13 Following his debutof La Grande Jatte at the Impressionist Exhibition in 1886, Seurat spent the summer painting along the Channel coast of the port city of Honfleur. He loved the pearly light that dissolved solid forms when he was looking at the sea, hence he reduced his palette, from red/orange and green/blue to the colour tan, aquamarine, blue and lavender.
  • 23.
    The evening sunis filling the pic- ture with a warm, refracted light, with which the varied nuances of colour accord.
  • 25.
    Dark blue banksof cloud with dots the colour of tan thrusts their way into the expansive yellow sky from the right.
  • 27.
    The few solidobjects in the picture, such as the piles and rock in the foreground, combine effectively into a calmly structured rhythm.
  • 29.
    GS 17 most importantly, an importantinnovation in Evening, Honfluer is the painted frame which surrounds the compo- sition. Seurat had begun to add painted frames executed directly onto the canvas. Yet another instance of his continual search to refine his technique, the painted borders con- sists of small strokes of colour that responds as complements to the hues in the composi- tion.
  • 31.
    GS 18 Evening, Honfleur, isthe timeless poetry of the sea which the Symbolist writers so greatly ad- mired. Seurat’s seascapes are marked by serene tran- quility and an all-permeating light. He was interested in neither the hustle & bustle of the ports, nor in the colourful scenes on the beaches. Instead, he turned his attention to the diverse moods created by the constantly changing light over the sea. Paul Adam, a Symbolist poet, described it as, “An orchestra of symphonic dabs of colour”
  • 32.
    GS 19 in a nutshell, Seuratunderstood how to classically com- pose a major work, yet uses new techniques whilst doing so. He was a Neo-Impressionist because despite painting everyday life, he painted them in a large scale format. He also used earth pig- ments: ochres and browns long frowned upon by the Impressionists and they lend the pic- ture a soft & muted harmony.
  • 33.
    GS 20 The previously sketchy Impressionisteffect has been transmuted into a depiction of great calm, harmony and well-thought out order.
  • 34.
    GS 21 Seurat is theartist of the 19th century because his paintings provided inspiration to the contemporaries of his time, such as:
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
    GS 22 Georges-Pierre Seurat Futurism +Cubism They all bear witness in the absolute value placed upon abstract cultural imperatives to their great predecessor, Georges Seurat. Henri Matisse ABSTRACTION Robert Delaunay Oskar Schlemmer Piet Mondrian De Stijl
  • 40.
    GS 23 Seurat had aripple effect: he served as an inspiration not only to artists, but to writers as well. He was a precursor to Art Nouveau and Art Deco.
  • 41.
    GS 24 Seurat’s technique stilllives in contemporary today:
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
    GS 25 “How unfair peopleare about Seurat! They refuse to recognise him as one of the geniuses of our century! He was interested in everything and achieved definitive results in the fields of black and white drawing, the harmony of lines, of composition, of contrast, and the harmony of colour... and even in that of the frame. What more can one ask of an artist?” — Paul Signac, in a tribute to Seurat which he wrote in his journal —
  • 46.
  • 47.
    GS 26 BIBLIOGRAPHY Salvesen, B.(2004) Seurat and the Making of “La Grande Jatte.” The Art Institute of Chicago Duchting, H. (2000) Seurat. Taschen Foa, M. (2005) Georges Seurat: The Art of Vision. Yale Uni- versity Press Smith, P. (1997) Seurat and the Avant-Garde. Yale University Press.