The Stakeholder Engagement tool helps ensure that the appropriate stakeholders in decision processes have been identified and involved.
Tool: https://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ms-11-46-e
Webinar Recording: http://universityofnc.adobeconnect.com/p99y8bhnosx/
The Stakeholder Engagement tool helps ensure that the appropriate stakeholders in decision processes have been identified and involved.
Tool: https://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ms-11-46-e
Webinar Recording: http://universityofnc.adobeconnect.com/p99y8bhnosx/
The Information Use Map assesses and identifies opportunities for improved data use and feedback mechanisms for stakeholders across different levels of the health system.
https://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ms-11-46-c
Presentation recording: http://universityofnc.adobeconnect.com/p1kr6eri348/
Step 1 Engage Stakeholders The first step in the CD.docxdessiechisomjj4
Step 1: Engage Stakeholders
The first step in the CDC Framework approach to program evaluation is to engage the
stakeholders. Stakeholders are people or organizations that are invested in the program, are
interested in the results of the evaluation, and/or have a stake in what will be done with the
results of the evaluation. Representing their needs and interests throughout the process is
fundamental to good program evaluation.
Typical Stakeholders in Public Health
Key stakeholders for evaluations of public health programs fall into three major groups:
• Those involved in program operations: Management, program staff, partners, funding
agencies, and coalition members.
• Those served or affected by the program: Patients or clients, advocacy groups,
community members, and elected officials.
• Those who are intended users of the evaluation findings: Persons in a position to make
decisions about the program, such as partners, funding agencies, coalition members, and
the general public or taxpayers.
Clearly, these categories are not mutually exclusive; in particular, the primary users of
evaluation findings are often members of the other two groups, i.e., the program management or
an advocacy organization or coalition. While you may think you know your stakeholders well,
these categories help you to think broadly and inclusively in identifying stakeholders.
Potential Stakeholders in Public Health Programs
• Program managers and staff.
• Local, state, and regional coalitions interested in the public health issue.
• Local grantees of your funds.
• Local and national advocacy partners.
• Other funding agencies, such as national and state governments.
• State or local health departments and health commissioners.
• State education agencies, schools, and other educational groups.
• Universities and educational institutions.
• Local government, state legislators, and state governors.
• Privately owned businesses and business associations.
• Health care systems and the medical community.
• Religious organizations.
• Community organizations.
• Private citizens.
• Program critics.
• Representatives of populations disproportionately affected by the problem.
• Law enforcement representatives.
Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs Page 13
Why Stakeholders are Important to an Evaluation
Stakeholders can help (or hinder) an evaluation before it is conducted, while it is being
conducted, and after the results are collected and ready for use. Because so many public health
efforts are complex and because public health agencies may be several layers removed from
frontline implementation, stakeholders take on particular importance in ensuring that the right
evaluation questions are identified and that evaluation results will be used to make a difference.
Stakeholders are much more likely to support the evaluation and act on the results and
recommendations if they are involved.
Agenda SettingA key aspect of the policy process is agendacheryllwashburn
Agenda Setting
A key aspect of the policy process is agenda setting. How do topics get on that agenda? Agenda setting requires the support of stakeholders to move the issue forward. In this week's media presentation, Dr. Kathleen White outlines the policy process and discusses how to move issues into the policy arena through agenda setting. The ultimate goal is to gain the attention of leadership whether at the organizational, local, state, national, or international level.
To prepare:
Review this week’s media presentation, focusing on the insights shared by Dr. White and Dr. Stanley on agenda setting and identification of stakeholders.
Brainstorm clinical practice issues that you believe are worthy of being on your organization’s systematic agenda.
Who are the stakeholders who would be interested in this clinical practice issue?
By tomorrow 03/14/2018 3pm, write a minimum of 550 words in APA format with at least 3 scholarly references from the list of required readings below. Include the level one headings as numbered below”
Post
a cohesive response that addresses the following:
1) In the first line of your posting, identify the clinical practice issue you would like to see on your organization’s systematic agenda.
2) What strategies would you use to inform stakeholders and persuade them of the importance of your identified clinical practice issue?
Required Readings
Hyder, A., Syed, S., Puvanachandra, P., Bloom, G., Sundaram, S., Mahmood, S., ... Peters, D. (2010). Stakeholder analysis for health research: case studies from low- and middle-income countries. Public Health, 124(3), 159–166.
This study demonstrates how the engagement of stakeholders in research and policy making can assist in the successful implementation of policy proposals. The authors propose that by engaging stakeholders, researchers and policy makers are provided with multiple perspectives on proposed policies, which can lead to greater success with policy adoption and implementation.
Lavis, J. N., Permanand, G., Oxman, A. D., Lewin, S., & Fretheim, A. (2009). SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Research Policy & Systems, 71–79. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S13
The purpose of a policy brief is to communicate an issue clearly and definitively to policy makers. The authors of this article propose an outline for policy briefs and also stress the importance of using research when creating a policy brief.
Lowery, B. (2009). Obesity, bariatric nursing, and the policy process: The connecting points for patient advocacy. Bariatric Nursing & Surgical Patient Care, 4(2), 133–138.
This article provides an example of nurse involvement in policy making by examining a bariatric nursing issue. The author stresses that nurses, in their patient-advocacy role, have a responsibility to be involved in the health care ...
This is a sample of training concepts related to grant or funding proposal development. You will note that it refers to HIV/AIDS services, although the concepts are universal. Customizable training of this type is currently offered in South Florida or Central Indiana. Courses are available in Strategic Planning, Board Orientation and Training, Program Development, Grant Writing and Evaluation. Courses may be introductory in nature or highly advanced resulting in completed projects.
The perfect Sundabet Slot mudah menang Promo new member Animated PDF for your conversation. Discover and Share the best GIFs on Tenor
Admin Ramah Cantik Aktif 24 Jam Nonstop siap melayani pemain member Sundabet login via apk sundabet rtp daftar slot gacor daftar
The Information Use Map assesses and identifies opportunities for improved data use and feedback mechanisms for stakeholders across different levels of the health system.
https://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ms-11-46-c
Presentation recording: http://universityofnc.adobeconnect.com/p1kr6eri348/
Step 1 Engage Stakeholders The first step in the CD.docxdessiechisomjj4
Step 1: Engage Stakeholders
The first step in the CDC Framework approach to program evaluation is to engage the
stakeholders. Stakeholders are people or organizations that are invested in the program, are
interested in the results of the evaluation, and/or have a stake in what will be done with the
results of the evaluation. Representing their needs and interests throughout the process is
fundamental to good program evaluation.
Typical Stakeholders in Public Health
Key stakeholders for evaluations of public health programs fall into three major groups:
• Those involved in program operations: Management, program staff, partners, funding
agencies, and coalition members.
• Those served or affected by the program: Patients or clients, advocacy groups,
community members, and elected officials.
• Those who are intended users of the evaluation findings: Persons in a position to make
decisions about the program, such as partners, funding agencies, coalition members, and
the general public or taxpayers.
Clearly, these categories are not mutually exclusive; in particular, the primary users of
evaluation findings are often members of the other two groups, i.e., the program management or
an advocacy organization or coalition. While you may think you know your stakeholders well,
these categories help you to think broadly and inclusively in identifying stakeholders.
Potential Stakeholders in Public Health Programs
• Program managers and staff.
• Local, state, and regional coalitions interested in the public health issue.
• Local grantees of your funds.
• Local and national advocacy partners.
• Other funding agencies, such as national and state governments.
• State or local health departments and health commissioners.
• State education agencies, schools, and other educational groups.
• Universities and educational institutions.
• Local government, state legislators, and state governors.
• Privately owned businesses and business associations.
• Health care systems and the medical community.
• Religious organizations.
• Community organizations.
• Private citizens.
• Program critics.
• Representatives of populations disproportionately affected by the problem.
• Law enforcement representatives.
Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs Page 13
Why Stakeholders are Important to an Evaluation
Stakeholders can help (or hinder) an evaluation before it is conducted, while it is being
conducted, and after the results are collected and ready for use. Because so many public health
efforts are complex and because public health agencies may be several layers removed from
frontline implementation, stakeholders take on particular importance in ensuring that the right
evaluation questions are identified and that evaluation results will be used to make a difference.
Stakeholders are much more likely to support the evaluation and act on the results and
recommendations if they are involved.
Agenda SettingA key aspect of the policy process is agendacheryllwashburn
Agenda Setting
A key aspect of the policy process is agenda setting. How do topics get on that agenda? Agenda setting requires the support of stakeholders to move the issue forward. In this week's media presentation, Dr. Kathleen White outlines the policy process and discusses how to move issues into the policy arena through agenda setting. The ultimate goal is to gain the attention of leadership whether at the organizational, local, state, national, or international level.
To prepare:
Review this week’s media presentation, focusing on the insights shared by Dr. White and Dr. Stanley on agenda setting and identification of stakeholders.
Brainstorm clinical practice issues that you believe are worthy of being on your organization’s systematic agenda.
Who are the stakeholders who would be interested in this clinical practice issue?
By tomorrow 03/14/2018 3pm, write a minimum of 550 words in APA format with at least 3 scholarly references from the list of required readings below. Include the level one headings as numbered below”
Post
a cohesive response that addresses the following:
1) In the first line of your posting, identify the clinical practice issue you would like to see on your organization’s systematic agenda.
2) What strategies would you use to inform stakeholders and persuade them of the importance of your identified clinical practice issue?
Required Readings
Hyder, A., Syed, S., Puvanachandra, P., Bloom, G., Sundaram, S., Mahmood, S., ... Peters, D. (2010). Stakeholder analysis for health research: case studies from low- and middle-income countries. Public Health, 124(3), 159–166.
This study demonstrates how the engagement of stakeholders in research and policy making can assist in the successful implementation of policy proposals. The authors propose that by engaging stakeholders, researchers and policy makers are provided with multiple perspectives on proposed policies, which can lead to greater success with policy adoption and implementation.
Lavis, J. N., Permanand, G., Oxman, A. D., Lewin, S., & Fretheim, A. (2009). SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Research Policy & Systems, 71–79. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S13
The purpose of a policy brief is to communicate an issue clearly and definitively to policy makers. The authors of this article propose an outline for policy briefs and also stress the importance of using research when creating a policy brief.
Lowery, B. (2009). Obesity, bariatric nursing, and the policy process: The connecting points for patient advocacy. Bariatric Nursing & Surgical Patient Care, 4(2), 133–138.
This article provides an example of nurse involvement in policy making by examining a bariatric nursing issue. The author stresses that nurses, in their patient-advocacy role, have a responsibility to be involved in the health care ...
This is a sample of training concepts related to grant or funding proposal development. You will note that it refers to HIV/AIDS services, although the concepts are universal. Customizable training of this type is currently offered in South Florida or Central Indiana. Courses are available in Strategic Planning, Board Orientation and Training, Program Development, Grant Writing and Evaluation. Courses may be introductory in nature or highly advanced resulting in completed projects.
The perfect Sundabet Slot mudah menang Promo new member Animated PDF for your conversation. Discover and Share the best GIFs on Tenor
Admin Ramah Cantik Aktif 24 Jam Nonstop siap melayani pemain member Sundabet login via apk sundabet rtp daftar slot gacor daftar
2137ad - Characters that live in Merindol and are at the center of main storiesluforfor
Kurgan is a russian expatriate that is secretly in love with Sonia Contado. Henry is a british soldier that took refuge in Merindol Colony in 2137ad. He is the lover of Sonia Contado.
The Legacy of Breton In A New Age by Master Terrance LindallBBaez1
Brave Destiny 2003 for the Future for Technocratic Surrealmageddon Destiny for Andre Breton Legacy in Agenda 21 Technocratic Great Reset for Prison Planet Earth Galactica! The Prophecy of the Surreal Blasphemous Desires from the Paradise Lost Governments!
Explore the multifaceted world of Muntadher Saleh, an Iraqi polymath renowned for his expertise in visual art, writing, design, and pharmacy. This SlideShare delves into his innovative contributions across various disciplines, showcasing his unique ability to blend traditional themes with modern aesthetics. Learn about his impactful artworks, thought-provoking literary pieces, and his vision as a Neo-Pop artist dedicated to raising awareness about Iraq's cultural heritage. Discover why Muntadher Saleh is celebrated as "The Last Polymath" and how his multidisciplinary talents continue to inspire and influence.
2137ad Merindol Colony Interiors where refugee try to build a seemengly norm...luforfor
This are the interiors of the Merindol Colony in 2137ad after the Climate Change Collapse and the Apocalipse Wars. Merindol is a small Colony in the Italian Alps where there are around 4000 humans. The Colony values mainly around meritocracy and selection by effort.
thGAP - BAbyss in Moderno!! Transgenic Human Germline Alternatives ProjectMarc Dusseiller Dusjagr
thGAP - Transgenic Human Germline Alternatives Project, presents an evening of input lectures, discussions and a performative workshop on artistic interventions for future scenarios of human genetic and inheritable modifications.
To begin our lecturers, Marc Dusseiller aka "dusjagr" and Rodrigo Martin Iglesias, will give an overview of their transdisciplinary practices, including the history of hackteria, a global network for sharing knowledge to involve artists in hands-on and Do-It-With-Others (DIWO) working with the lifesciences, and reflections on future scenarios from the 8-bit computer games of the 80ies to current real-world endeavous of genetically modifiying the human species.
We will then follow up with discussions and hands-on experiments on working with embryos, ovums, gametes, genetic materials from code to slime, in a creative and playful workshop setup, where all paticipant can collaborate on artistic interventions into the germline of a post-human future.
2. Session Objectives
Explain the context of decision making
Define the concept of stakeholders
Explain the importance of involving
stakeholders throughout the data use in
decision-making cycle
Introduce the Stakeholder Analysis and
Engagement tools
3. Session Overview
Context of decision making
Stakeholders
Decisions
Data
Small Group Activity 3: Stakeholder Analysis
and Engagement
7. What Is a Stakeholder?
Any person, group, or organization with a
particular interest in a policy or program
Government agencies
Beneficiaries
Policymakers
Funding agencies
Providers / implementers
Civil society
Researchers
M&E specialists
9. Data Producers vs. Data Users
Data producers think that decision makers:
• Value “political” considerations over evidence
• Are unprepared to measure or evaluate the
consequences of their decisions
Decision makers or data users think that health
researchers and M&E specialists:
Lack responsiveness to priorities
Favor numbers / jargon over transparent
communication
Prefer written reports to face-to-face conversation
10. Importance of Knowing Your
Stakeholders
View activities from different perspectives
Have different degrees of understanding
Need / want different information
Need information at different levels of complexity
Have different intensities of interest
Have different roles in the decision-making process
11. Results of Involving Stakeholders in
Data Use Process
Relevance of data
Ownership of data
Appropriate dissemination of data
Use of data
12. Stakeholder Analysis Matrix
& Engagement Plan
Clarify who has interest in a program and
what that interest is
Identify who can help a program and
how, and who can hurt it
Help you use this information for the
success of the planning effort
13. Stakeholder Analysis Matrix
The Stakeholder Analysis Matrix is a framework
and process for:
Identifying stakeholders
Defining their roles and resources
Identifying dynamics among stakeholders
Setting the optimum stakeholder group
14. Stakeholder Analysis Matrix
Name of
Stakeholder
organization,
group or
individual
Stakeholder
description
Primary purpose,
affiliation, funding
Potential role in
the issue or
activity
Level of
knowledge of
the issue
Level of
commitment
Support or
oppose the
activity, to what
extent, and why?
Available
resources
Staff, money,
technology,
information,
influence
15. Name of
stakeholder
organization,
group, or
individual
Stakeholder
description
Primary purpose,
affiliation, funding
Potential role in
the issue or
activity
Level of
knowledge of
the issue
Level of
commitment
Support or oppose
the activity, to what
extent, and why?
Available
resources
Staff, money,
technology,
information,
influence
National AIDS
Control
Committee
(NACC)
Involved in
planning,
implementation,
M&E of all
HIV/AIDS
programs in the
country;
approves donor
and NGO-funded
HIV/AIDS
programs
Facilitates the
stakeholder
meeting,
prepares for
meeting by
identifying
data sources
and preparing
an agenda
High –
receives
reports on
PMTCT
activities
from MCH
division at
MOH;
Medium
level of
knowledge
of int’l
guidelines
and studies
Strongly
supports activity
but hesitant to
use international
data sources.
NACC opposes
use of the DHS
and most recent
international
estimates, as it
considers these
sources to
overestimate HIV
prevalence
Staff available
to facilitate;
room and
computers
available for
meetings at
NACC
headquarters
Stakeholder Analysis Matrix
Program issue Develop plan (inc. M&E plan) to scale up PMTCT programs throughout system.
Proposed activity Convene stakeholders to identify priorities based on available data and develop action plan.
Date November 2006
16. How to Involve Stakeholders
Quarterly program management meetings
Quarterly meetings to interpret RHIS data
Involvement of facility staff to interpret program
data
M&E system improvement
Indicator planning and/or harmonization
Data quality review meetings
17. Stakeholder Engagement Plan
Stakeholder
organization, group,
or individual
Potential role
in the activity
Engagement
strategy
How will you engage
this stakeholder
in the activity?
Follow-up strategy
Plans for feedback
or continued
involvement
Program issue
Proposed activity
Date
18. Stakeholder Engagement Plan
Stakeholder
organization,
group, or
individual
Potential role
in the activity
Engagement strategy
How will you engage this
stakeholder in the
activity?
Follow-up strategy
Plans for feedback or
continued
involvement
National AIDS
Control
Committee
(NACC)
Facilitates the
stakeholder meeting,
prepares for meeting
by identifying data
sources and
preparing an agenda
that allows for the
sources to be
discussed
The NACC is the lead
in this activity. It will
be important for the
NACC to involve
more specifically the
PMTCT coordinator,
clinical care
coordinator, and
National AIDS
Program Coordinator
The NACC is
responsible for
following up with the
prioritized
stakeholders
Program issue Develop plan (inc. M&E plan) to scale up PMTCT programs throughout system.
Proposed activity Convene stakeholders to identify priorities based on available data and develop action plan.
Date November 2006
20. Decision Areas
Program design and evaluation
Program management and improvement
Strategic planning
Advocacy and policy development
21. Program Design and Evaluation
Design
Select messages for prevention campaigns
Evaluation
Determine if new program approaches are
needed to ensure that health impact
objectives are met
22. Program Management and
Improvement
Management
Determine if the program is meeting its
process objectives
Improvement
Develop new strategies to increase
coverage
23. Strategic Planning
Identify geographic areas of highest
need
Determine human resource allocation
Determine which of offered services is
making the greatest impact
24. Advocacy and Policy Development
Identifying and quantifying underserved
populations
Identifying focus areas for new policies
26. Data and Information
Census
Vital events data
Surveillance data
Household surveys
Facilities-level service statistics
Financial and management information
Modeling, estimates, and projections
Health research
28. Stakeholders Involve new counterparts
Strengthening the Decision-
making Process
Decisions Understand service delivery realities
Data May require additional data
29. Key Messages
Every decision is made in the context of
available data and stakeholders
Critically assessing and involving stakeholders
will facilitate data-informed decision making
30. Small Group Activity 3: Instructions
Break into small groups.
Each group should select a decision that they make in
their work settings and complete the Stakeholder
Analysis Matrix around that decision.
A minimum of 7 stakeholders should be identified.
Complete the Matrix across the columns for 1–2
stakeholders.
Select 1 stakeholder and complete the Stakeholder
Engagement Plan for that stakeholder.
Time for activity: 45 minutes
31. Group Work Report Back
Have note taker transfer your final Stakeholder
Analysis Matrix onto flip chart paper
Share the decision your group chose
Share the priority stakeholders selected
Choose 1 stakeholder and share the entire row
from the Matrix for that stakeholder
Share the Engagement Plan for the same
stakeholder
Time for report back: 10–15 min per group
32. THANK YOU!
MEASURE Evaluation is a MEASURE project funded by the U.S.
Agency for International Development and implemented by the
Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group International, ICF
Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and
Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do not
necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. Government.
MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's primary
vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and evaluation in
population, health and nutrition worldwide.
Visit us online at http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure