This document summarizes two studies on the effects of road salt (NaCl) on amphibian populations. Field studies found that salt concentrations were negatively correlated with distance from roads and species richness. Laboratory experiments showed high mortality rates in wood frogs and spotted salamanders exposed to environmentally relevant salt concentrations. Chronic exposure caused physiological changes and decreased time to metamorphosis. The studies conclude that road salt exposure can negatively impact amphibian community structure by excluding salt-sensitive species.
(See notes below) Four hundred years ago, the Chesapeake Bay that the English colonists found here was lined with huge oyster reefs that grew up from the bottom in waters both deep and shallow. Those reefs provided the base for much of the life in the Bay and its rivers, from worms and barnacles through mud crabs and tiny fish to big blue crabs and predators like sheepshead, drum, and rockfish (striped bass).
The oyster reefs weren’t as “pretty” (to us humans) as the coral reefs further south, but in terms of ecosystem richness, they were just as important. One key to their strength was their three-dimensional structure, which successive generations built gradually on the shells of their predecessors over several thousands of years. The structures placed the oysters up in the water column, away from gill-choking bottom sediments, where dissolved oxygen was plentiful and currents brought food in the form of algae cells seeking sunlight.
This PowerPoint presentation, developed by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Fisheries Program Director Bill Goldsborough, tells the story of those reefs and what has happened to them over the past four hundred years. It is not a pretty story, but it offers a hopeful conclusion, as we learn more each year about how to restore these essential elements in the Chesapeake ecosystem.
Anglers have as much to gain as anyone in restoring the Chesapeake’s oysters. The presentation closes with suggestions for how to get involved in oyster restoration, and how to incorporate the restoration reefs into your 2015 angling season.
To participate in CBF’s oyster restoration programs in Virginia and Maryland, visit http://www.cbf.org/oysters.
(See notes below) Four hundred years ago, the Chesapeake Bay that the English colonists found here was lined with huge oyster reefs that grew up from the bottom in waters both deep and shallow. Those reefs provided the base for much of the life in the Bay and its rivers, from worms and barnacles through mud crabs and tiny fish to big blue crabs and predators like sheepshead, drum, and rockfish (striped bass).
The oyster reefs weren’t as “pretty” (to us humans) as the coral reefs further south, but in terms of ecosystem richness, they were just as important. One key to their strength was their three-dimensional structure, which successive generations built gradually on the shells of their predecessors over several thousands of years. The structures placed the oysters up in the water column, away from gill-choking bottom sediments, where dissolved oxygen was plentiful and currents brought food in the form of algae cells seeking sunlight.
This PowerPoint presentation, developed by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Fisheries Program Director Bill Goldsborough, tells the story of those reefs and what has happened to them over the past four hundred years. It is not a pretty story, but it offers a hopeful conclusion, as we learn more each year about how to restore these essential elements in the Chesapeake ecosystem.
Anglers have as much to gain as anyone in restoring the Chesapeake’s oysters. The presentation closes with suggestions for how to get involved in oyster restoration, and how to incorporate the restoration reefs into your 2015 angling season.
To participate in CBF’s oyster restoration programs in Virginia and Maryland, visit http://www.cbf.org/oysters.
(See notes below) Four hundred years ago, the Chesapeake Bay that the English colonists found here was lined with huge oyster reefs that grew up from the bottom in waters both deep and shallow. Those reefs provided the base for much of the life in the Bay and its rivers, from worms and barnacles through mud crabs and tiny fish to big blue crabs and predators like sheepshead, drum, and rockfish (striped bass).
The oyster reefs weren’t as “pretty” (to us humans) as the coral reefs further south, but in terms of ecosystem richness, they were just as important. One key to their strength was their three-dimensional structure, which successive generations built gradually on the shells of their predecessors over several thousands of years. The structures placed the oysters up in the water column, away from gill-choking bottom sediments, where dissolved oxygen was plentiful and currents brought food in the form of algae cells seeking sunlight.
This PowerPoint presentation, developed by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Fisheries Program Director Bill Goldsborough, tells the story of those reefs and what has happened to them over the past four hundred years. It is not a pretty story, but it offers a hopeful conclusion, as we learn more each year about how to restore these essential elements in the Chesapeake ecosystem.
Anglers have as much to gain as anyone in restoring the Chesapeake’s oysters. The presentation closes with suggestions for how to get involved in oyster restoration, and how to incorporate the restoration reefs into your 2015 angling season.
To participate in CBF’s oyster restoration programs in Virginia and Maryland, visit http://www.cbf.org/oysters.
This presentation contains survival growth data from a successful pilot project to determine if oysters could survive in Dorchester's Malibu Bay. The Massachusetts Oyster Project for Clean Water conducted the pilot as part of its ongoing effort to restore oysters to the estuaries of Boston Harbor. To learn more visit www.massoyster.org
Exploration of the Cost-Effectiveness of Using Oysters for Nitrogen Removal F...Mass Oyster Project
Here we discuss the first iteration of a model that examines the case for using oysters as a tool to add incremental capacity for removing nitrogen from waste water. It was presented at the 7th Annual Massachusetts Water Resources Conference. The Massachusetts Oyster Project is a non-profit active in oyster restoration. www.massoyster.org
(See notes below) Four hundred years ago, the Chesapeake Bay that the English colonists found here was lined with huge oyster reefs that grew up from the bottom in waters both deep and shallow. Those reefs provided the base for much of the life in the Bay and its rivers, from worms and barnacles through mud crabs and tiny fish to big blue crabs and predators like sheepshead, drum, and rockfish (striped bass).
The oyster reefs weren’t as “pretty” (to us humans) as the coral reefs further south, but in terms of ecosystem richness, they were just as important. One key to their strength was their three-dimensional structure, which successive generations built gradually on the shells of their predecessors over several thousands of years. The structures placed the oysters up in the water column, away from gill-choking bottom sediments, where dissolved oxygen was plentiful and currents brought food in the form of algae cells seeking sunlight.
This PowerPoint presentation, developed by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Fisheries Program Director Bill Goldsborough, tells the story of those reefs and what has happened to them over the past four hundred years. It is not a pretty story, but it offers a hopeful conclusion, as we learn more each year about how to restore these essential elements in the Chesapeake ecosystem.
Anglers have as much to gain as anyone in restoring the Chesapeake’s oysters. The presentation closes with suggestions for how to get involved in oyster restoration, and how to incorporate the restoration reefs into your 2015 angling season.
To participate in CBF’s oyster restoration programs in Virginia and Maryland, visit http://www.cbf.org/oysters.
This presentation contains survival growth data from a successful pilot project to determine if oysters could survive in Dorchester's Malibu Bay. The Massachusetts Oyster Project for Clean Water conducted the pilot as part of its ongoing effort to restore oysters to the estuaries of Boston Harbor. To learn more visit www.massoyster.org
Exploration of the Cost-Effectiveness of Using Oysters for Nitrogen Removal F...Mass Oyster Project
Here we discuss the first iteration of a model that examines the case for using oysters as a tool to add incremental capacity for removing nitrogen from waste water. It was presented at the 7th Annual Massachusetts Water Resources Conference. The Massachusetts Oyster Project is a non-profit active in oyster restoration. www.massoyster.org
One of the six lectures composing 'Exploring Ocean, Explore the Planet Earth' online course offered by Blue Green Foundation Bangladesh & Octophin. The training was attended by participants from 40 countries. The presentation is organized in three sections: (i) the good- describing what benefits we get from the Ocean, (ii) the bad- bad things happening to the ocean because of human activities, e.g. climate change and their impacts on the sea, (iii) the ugly- very bad things that are happening to the sea due to anthropogenic activities, pollution and their impacts on ocean life forms are discussed in this section.
This presentation introduces two of the main threats that climate change poses to the survival of coral reefs: ocean acidification and bleaching events due to global warming.
Ocean acidification is a term used to describe the changes in the chemistry of the Earth’s ocean i.e. ongoing decrease in the pH and increase in acidity caused by the uptake of anthropogenic carbon dioxide from the atmosphere causing major problems for the coral reefs and other organisms.
Water Worries -- Nitrogen From Septic Tanks, Fertilizer, Poor Sewage Treatmen...Save The Great South Bay
Prof Christopher Gobler of Stony Brook University, a global expert on algal blooms and their causes, presents his overview of Long Island's nitrogen pollution problem and how that is triggering destructive algal blooms throughout our bays. The main culprit? 500,000 septic tanks.
Sunscreen Chemical in Soaps, Cosmetics & Body Fragrances Threaten Coral Reefs v2zq
Sunscreen Chemical in Soaps, Cosmetics & Body Fragrances Threaten Coral Reefs - Resources for Healthy Children www.scribd.com/doc/254613619 - For more information, Please see Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children www.scribd.com/doc/254613963 - Gardening with Volcanic Rock Dust www.scribd.com/doc/254613846 - Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech www.scribd.com/doc/254613765 - Free School Gardening Art Posters www.scribd.com/doc/254613694 - Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden www.scribd.com/doc/254609890 - Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success www.scribd.com/doc/254613619 - City Chickens for your Organic School Garden www.scribd.com/doc/254613553 - Huerto Ecológico, Tecnologías Sostenibles, Agricultura Organica www.scribd.com/doc/254613494 - Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide www.scribd.com/doc/254613410 - Free Organic Gardening Publications www.scribd.com/doc/254609890 ~ haereticus-lab.org
Disturbance of benthic algae by spawning Pacific salmon in Thompson Creek, MIjmkosiara
This is a presentation of my undergraduate senior thesis project at LSSU. This study focused on the effects of spawning Pacific salmon on benthic algal biomass via nutrient enrichment and bioturbation
1. The Effects of Road Salt (NaCl) on the Survivorship of Two Vernal Pool-Breeding Amphibians: The Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica) and Spotted Salamander (Ambystoma maculatum) Denise M. Roth Baldwin-Wallace College Department of Biology May 1, 2009
2. “Why should we care if they all die? They are gross anyway!” -BW student
3. Well… Good Question http://www.fishingfury.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/record-halibut.jpg
5. So… What is going on? E.O. Wilson says: Habitat destruction Invasive species Population Pollution Over-harvesting http://farm1.static.flickr.com/123/330811704_282ee8a597.jpg
6. What is a Vernal Pool?? Temporary Form from melting snow and spring rains Dry mid to late summer Unpredictable Naturally occurring Shallow (4ft > deep) Impermeable substrate on bottom Free of predatory fish http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/amherst/images/vernalpool.jpg
7. Vernal Pool (cont.) Contain one or more of four indicator species Blue-spotted Salamanders (Ambystoma laterale) Fairy Shrimp (Anostraca) Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica) Spotted Salamander (Ambystoma maculatum) http://www.umaine.edu/wetlands/VPecology.htm
13. Salts as De-Icing Agents NaCl most common 5 million tons/yr in Canada 10-15 million tons/yr in US (Environment Canada Website) Lower freezing point of water! melts at lower temperatures Cheap ~$30/ton Effective Above ~ 15˚F
14. Effects of road de-icing salt (NaCl) on larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) DomenicoSanzo, Stephen J. Hecnar 2003 Environmental pollution
15. Objective Determine the effect of road salts, if any, on amphibians at environmentally relevant field concentrations Hypothesis: Road salts have a negative effect on amphibians.
16. Study Location Thunder Bay, Canada Lakehead University Environmental Laboratories http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/united_states/united_states_wall_2002_us.jpg
17. Field Concentrations Water analysis of 59 wetlands 2 water samples from opposite ends of each Analyzed in university lab Expected to see: Salt concentrations negatively correlated with increasing distance of a wetland from the nearest road Negative correlation between salt concentrations and species richness
18. Results: Field Concentration Range in NaCl from 0.39 to 1030.00 mg/l Seawater ~ 3.5% NaCl ( 19,400 mg/l) NaCl decreased with increasing distance from nearest road Species richness negatively correlated with NaCl and positively correlated with increasing distance to nearest road
28. Conclusions Road salts have a negative impact Chloride in roadside pools much higher than woodlands Supports hypothesis Species richness negatively correlated with NaCl concentrations Fewer tadpoles metamorphose with higher concentrations Does this relate to other amphibians? and is the evidence conclusive?
29. Sara J. Collins, Ronald W. Russell 2006 Environmental pollution Toxicity of road salt to Nova Scotia amphibians
30. Objective “…examine how chloride concentrations in ponds, due to application of road salt, influence amphibian community structure and richness in roadside wetlands of Nova Scotia.” Hypothesis: Elevated Chloride concentrations affect amphibian populations
31. Nova Scotia April-Sept. 2006 26 ponds http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/united_states/united_states_wall_2002_us.jpg
39. Conclusions Spotted Salamanders and Wood Frogs were most sensitive to NaCl Road salt concentrations affected community structure Sensitive species were absent from high chloride concentrated ponds Acute toxicity results supported field observations Behavioral changes could result in reduction of species fitness
40. Interpretation Exposure to road salts can affect amphibian community structure and species richness by excluding salt-sensitive species from high chloride environments
41. Overall Conclusions At environmentally realistic concentrations, road salt caused physiological issues and decreased survivorship in amphibians. Acute toxicity results of both studies showed high rates of mortality Chronic exposure caused physiological differences
42. This is not new information! In 1859 Charles Darwin noted that “nearly all amphibians and their spawn were killed by sea water” (Origin of Species)
44. Alternatives Potassium Acetate -76˚F $700-800/ton Less toxic; less corrosive; can cause %50 solution irritation if inhaled
45. Future Studies Why do higher salt concentrations cause tadpoles to metamorphose faster? Why was there a spike in survival from 7500-9000 mg/l? Possible mutagenic effects of developing tadpoles Effects of other road salts on these two species Reasons for salt tolerance seen in the American Toad Long term effects on community structure How chemical runoff affects people
46. “We now face an extinction episode on this planet comparable to that which marked the end of the dinosaurs about 65 million years ago”(Planet Earth Episode 1)
52. Function of Chloride Chloride: membrane function and water absorption In the body reacts with potassium Helps maintain osmotic equilibrium by creating concentration gradient through ATP either goes in to the cell or leaves the cell ~ based on solute concentration in the water vs. solute in the cell Moves from high to low concentrations Helps maintain pH Kidney function: co-transport proteins Na+, K+, Cl -