The feedback from the second rough cut of the film was positive, with peers commenting that the opening sequence successfully conveyed emotion and engaged audiences. However, some feedback suggested shortening clips and speeding up the pace, as well as including more titles while keeping the simple font. In conclusion, the filmmakers felt the overall feedback was positive and confirmed their opening sequence was appropriate for their target audience and task requirements.

1. Second Rough Cut Feedback
The feedback we received from our second rough cut was again very positive.
We held a group meeting after receiving our feedback from our peers and came
to the following concussions.
Firstly we successfully conveyed the characters emotions in the opening
sequence and left the audience hooked to watch the rest of the film, which
showed we successfully met our aims and objectives as we set out to engage the
audience and sustain their attention.The was because a range of camera shots
had been used and framed appropriately with a good use of mise-en-scene.
On the other hand we also received feedback that mentions how our sequence
could be shortened and some of the clips could be made snappier to speed up the
pace of the film.
Similarly it was suggested to us that we include and incorporate more titles into
our sequence but maintain the simple fonts used in the current titles and they
suit the film and the editing style used.
In conclusion we feel that the overall feedback was very positive and we were
complimented on our opening sequence as it is appropriate for our target
audience and meets the requirements for our task.
Michael Hutchinson