1) Schmitz-werke (buyer) sued Rockland (seller) for breach of warranty regarding 15,000 meters of fabric ordered for transfer printing. 2) The court found that under the CISG, the fabric was not fit for the intended purpose of transfer printing. The buyer was not required to prove the exact nature of defects, only that it reasonably relied on the seller's representations that the fabric was suitable. 3) The court ruled in favor of the buyer, finding that the seller breached the warranty, as the fabric did not satisfactorily perform for its intended purpose of transfer printing.