Details of smp

1. TERM PAPER PRESENTED
ON
SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR INDIAN MINES
SUBMITTED BY-
23151006 - PRATIK TIWARI
23152007 -AVINASH KASHYAP
23152021 -NITESH KUMAR SHAH
SUBMITTED TO -
Prof. NC KARMAKAR
DEPARTMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING
1

2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Safety management system(SMS) in Indian mines
Changes in safety management concept
Safety Management Plan(SMP)
Objectives of Safety management plan
Elements of Safety management plan
Origin of Safety management plan
Steps for SMP development
Challenges faced during implementation of SMP
Conclusion
2

3. SMS in Indian mines
Statutory provision-not site specific
Rules(Acts) based system
Compliance-key focus
Enforcement driven
Number of agencies
Lack of accountability
Workers participation-limited 3

4. Changes in Safety Management
Concept
Risk based safety concept
Monitoring of risk
Involvement of all stake holder
Controls-time bound ,prioritised
Ownership , self improvement
Reduce-potentiality likelihood and impact of accident
4

5. Safety Management Plan
Working document
Outlines all of the actions to ensure safety & health at the workplace
Mine specific plan
Risk-based mining legislation
Focuses and addresses key risk areas
Based on detailed risk/hazard analysis
5

6. Objective of SMP
Set culture, framework and actions necessary to conduct operation safely
Protect safety & health from mining operation
Identify risks to safety and health from mining operation
Control and Monitoring the risks
Reduce the risk of injuries or illness resulting from operations etc at an acceptable
level
6

7. Elements of SMP
Safety and health policy
Planning for hazard identification, Assessment of Risk and its control
Statutory and other requirement
Role and responsibilities
Competency, Training and Awareness
Communications ,Consultation and Reporting 7

8. Elements of SMP…….
Hazard identification,
Emergency Preparedness and Response
Plan Monitoring and Correction
Incident investigation , Corrective and Preventive Action
Safety and Health Audits
Review, Changes and Contract of Management
8

9. Origin of Safety Management Plan
Origins of SMP in the mining industry can be attributed to several key
factors-
Historical Incidents: Major mining accidents and disasters like
 1906-Courrieres mining disaster in France
 1907-Monongah mining disaster in the US
• These incidents led to development of early safety regulations and
• Recognition of the importance of comprehensive safety management
9

10. Origin of Safety Management Plan
 International Initiatives: International bodies such as ILO and ICOH-
• Provided guidance
• Conducted research
• Facilitated knowledge-sharing among countries
Firstly,this concept was adopted in coal mines of Queensland, Australia
in 1990.
They introduced risk based mining legislation in 1990s in Australia.
10

11. Origin of Safety Management Plan
2000
9
th
conference
on
safety
in
mines
9th conference on safety
• Safety management system introduced
• Company wise experimental basis
• Risk assessment process-effective management of risk
• Risk management plan-risk assessment plan & implemented
11

12. Origin of Safety Management Plan
2000 2002
9
th
conference
on
safety
in
mines
DGMS
Circular
13
of
2002
DGMS Workshops-2000-2002 and guidelines as
circular 13 of 2002
• Reducing likelihood & impact of mishaps
• Guideline for implementation
12

13. Origin of Safety Management Plan
2000 2002 2007
9
th
conference
on
safety
in
mines
DGMS
Circular
13
of
2002
10
th
conference
on
safety
10th conference on safety
• Extended to every mines
• Managements responsibility
• training
13

14. Origin of Safety Management Plan
2000 2002 2007
9
th
conference
on
safety
in
mines
2013
DGMS
Circular
13
of
2002
10
th
conference
on
safety
11
th
Conference
on
safety
• Re-recommended of 10th
conference of safety and
implementation of SMP in
totality
14

15. Origin of Safety Management Plan
2000 2002 2007
9
th
conference
on
safety
in
mines
2013 2017
DGMS
Circular
13
of
2002
10
th
conference
on
safety
11
th
Conference
on
safety
Coal
mines
regulation
2017
CMR-2017
• Finally introduced in
CMR 2017, Reg.-104
15

16. Origin of Safety Management Plan
2000 2002 2007
9
th
conference
on
safety
in
mines
2013 2017
DGMS
Circular
13
of
2002
10
th
conference
on
safety
11
th
Conference
on
safety
Coal
mines
regulation
2017
16
2019
DGMS
Circular
of
2019
• Formulation &
guidelines for
implementation of
SMP

17. Inclusion of SMP in Mines Regulation
• Coal mines regulation, 2017
(Reg.104)
• Oil mines regulation, 2017
(Reg.131)
• (Draft) Metalliferous mines regulation, 2019
(Draft) Reg.114
17

18. Steps for SMP Development
Formation of
team
Established a
common
vocabulary
Hazard
identification
Risk Assessment
Formulation of
controls
Implementation
of controls
Monitoring
result &
Auditing
Safety
Management Plan
18

19. Identifying the Hazards
Inspection in the mine
Previous experience of accidents or occurrences on the mine
Work process evaluation
Consultation with employees who may have experience in the job
Safety statistics for this or other mines
Significant incident ,near miss or accident reports
By activities e.g. Drilling & blasting, load and haul, crushing 19

20. Inputs of Risk Assessment
20
Risk
Assessme-
nt Inputs
Contraventi
ons pointed
out by
regulators
and action Safety
officer’s
inspection
report
Previous
risk
assessment
documents Workmen’
s
inspection
report
Report
submitted
by internal
safety
organisatio
n
Reports on
accidents
& near
misses
Minutes of
safety
committee
meeting

21. Risk Assessment & Ranking
Risk score =
𝑳𝒊𝒌𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒉𝒐𝒐𝒅 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆
𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒉
𝒉𝒂𝒛𝒂𝒓𝒅
× 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆
Consequence - The size of the loss or damage
Likelihood- The chance that the hazard might occur
Risk score = Consequence X Probability X Exposure
Exposure- Percent time personnel are present
Probability - Chance that they will be harmed
21

22. Consequence
Sl No Consequence Score
1 Several Dead 5
2 One dead 1
3 Significant chance of fatality 0.3
4 One permanent disability/less chance of fatality 0.1
5 Many loss time injuries 0.01
6 One last time injuries 0.001
7 Small injury 0.0001
22

23. Probability
Sl No Probability Score
1 May well be expected 10
2 Quite possible 7
3 Unusual but possible 3
4 Only remotely possible 2
5 Conceivable but unlikely 1
6 Practically impossible 0.5
7 Virtually impossible 0.1
23

24. Exposure
Sl No Exposure Score
1 Continuous 10
2 Frequent (Daily) 5
3 Seldom (Weekly) 3
4 Unusual (Monthly) 2.5
5 Occasional (Yearly) 2
6 Once in 5 years 1.5
7 Once in 10 years 0.5
8 Once in 100 years 0.02
24

25. Risk Assessment & Ranking
Risk ranking will set the priorities for hazard control.
Hazard Risk score Remarks
High risk >=200 Requires Immediate
Management Attention
Medium Between 20-
200
Requires Management Attention
Low <=20 To be Reviewed
25

26. Risk Management (Hierarchy
of Control of Risk)
Elimination
Substitution
Engineering controls
Administrative
controls
PPE
Most
Effective
Least
Effective
Physically remove
the hazard
Replace the
hazard
Isolate people
from the hazard
Change the way
people work
Protect the worker
with personal
protective
equipment
26

27. Challenges faced during Implementation of SMP
Trust on statutes
Inertia
Proper communication
Organisational structure
Logistics
Trained supervisor 27

28. Conclusion
 The realisation of SMP will be a step towards self regulation.
Assessment of risks improves the safety as well as reduces
production cost.
SMP allows prioritisation of allocation of scarce resources.
Scope of auditing and improvement are always present.
28

29. References
 DGMS Circulars
Documents of National Safety Conference in Mines
CMR-2017, MMR-2019(Draft), OMR-2017
 Research Gate
 Safety Management Plan Of Some Mines
29

30. THANK YOU