Rtpcr
•
0 likes•10 views
A molecular biology report for a patient named Jawad Rahees summarizes that: a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); coronaviruses can cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases; and a negative test result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Rtpcr
1) A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
2) The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen.
3) A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using RT-PCR. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Jumaan Muzian summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
1) The patient underwent COVID-19 testing via nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
2) The test results were negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen.
3) A negative test result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male returned a negative result. The test used a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method, and notes that a single negative test does not exclude infection and repeat sampling is recommended for severe or progressive disease.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 26-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The SARS-CoV-2 test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient came back negative. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction methodology.
Recommended
Rtpcr
1) A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
2) The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen.
3) A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using RT-PCR. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Jumaan Muzian summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
1) The patient underwent COVID-19 testing via nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
2) The test results were negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen.
3) A negative test result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male returned a negative result. The test used a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method, and notes that a single negative test does not exclude infection and repeat sampling is recommended for severe or progressive disease.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 26-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The SARS-CoV-2 test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient came back negative. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction methodology.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 34-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not present in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male patient named Mohammed Sabeer T M. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 in respiratory tract specimens. A negative result does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Maitreyee Mishra indicates that a SARS-CoV-2 test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method. The test result was negative, meaning SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test interpretation for positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 25-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
1) The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 34-year-old male patient named Ashthaf Ali C. using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on 08/12/2021.
2) The test done was a SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen.
3) A negative result should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper collection, transport, or handling of the specimen.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammad Lisan Ali shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test used was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test intended to detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be interpreted along with clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Zamiya Nafis shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. Additional information is provided on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing and interpretation guidance.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 57-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected on December 30, 2021 and tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on December 24, 2021 and reported on December 25, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal with visit number V134270. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and reported a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the testing method, interpretation of results, and notes that a single negative test does not rule out infection and results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 32-year-old male patient named Sharique Pandial shows a negative result for SARS-CoV-2. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, the test method, result interpretation, and is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 44-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old male patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from patient Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, the test methodology, and guidance for interpreting negative and positive test results. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 37-year-old female patient named Nilufar Vanada with visit number V134275. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on December 31, 2021 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 27-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the coronavirus was not detected in the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) method. The report provides information on the coronavirus, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. The report provides information on the patient's details, test method used, pathogen information, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Mohammed Rameez M summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
More Related Content
What's hot
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 34-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not present in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male patient named Mohammed Sabeer T M. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 in respiratory tract specimens. A negative result does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Maitreyee Mishra indicates that a SARS-CoV-2 test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method. The test result was negative, meaning SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test interpretation for positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 25-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
1) The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 34-year-old male patient named Ashthaf Ali C. using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on 08/12/2021.
2) The test done was a SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen.
3) A negative result should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper collection, transport, or handling of the specimen.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammad Lisan Ali shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test used was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test intended to detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be interpreted along with clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Zamiya Nafis shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. Additional information is provided on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing and interpretation guidance.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 57-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected on December 30, 2021 and tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on December 24, 2021 and reported on December 25, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal with visit number V134270. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and reported a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the testing method, interpretation of results, and notes that a single negative test does not rule out infection and results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 32-year-old male patient named Sharique Pandial shows a negative result for SARS-CoV-2. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, the test method, result interpretation, and is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 44-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old male patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from patient Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, the test methodology, and guidance for interpreting negative and positive test results. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 37-year-old female patient named Nilufar Vanada with visit number V134275. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on December 31, 2021 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 27-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the coronavirus was not detected in the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) method. The report provides information on the coronavirus, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. The report provides information on the patient's details, test method used, pathogen information, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Similar to Rtpcr
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Mohammed Rameez M summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Gokul Das and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 67-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test on the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The report provides information on the test method used, details on coronavirus and the implications of positive and negative test results. It concludes that the negative result should be considered in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report explains that a negative result does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It also provides background information on corona viruses and the test method used.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Valeed shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 07/01/2022 came back negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and reported on 08/01/2022. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen but does not rule out infection, and the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Sooraj Govindan, a 31-year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and exposure risks, as a false negative is possible. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Nidhi Subhash, a 24 year old female, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/12/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, the coronavirus tested for, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Saifudeen K H, a 26 year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Nidhi Subhash shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old male patient. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Shazin shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of his nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test used was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test intended to detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen but does not rule out infection, as the test can return false negatives. The interpretation guidance notes that a single negative test does not exclude infection and recommends repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimens for severe or progressive disease.
Rtpcr 21093004140
A molecular biology report for a patient named Farzaan Sayyah showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report explained that coronaviruses can cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases like MERS and SARS. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not rule out infection, and results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative test results, and notes that repeat sampling may be needed for accurate results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Abdul Kader Arafath. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Similar to Rtpcr (18)
More from Care Reference Laboratory
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Certificate
This certificate confirms Saniya Bi Shaikh received two doses of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine. She received her first dose on August 3, 2021 from batch 4121Z088 and her second dose on October 30, 2021 from batch 4121Z105 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and contains contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Certificate
This certificate confirms that Saniya Bi Shaikh, an 18-year-old female, received the first dose of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine on July 3, 2021 and the second dose on September 30, 2021 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and lists contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a patient named Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR and was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample collected on April 2, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result for the patient identified as Mohammed Rameez M was negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted in the clinical context. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 04/02/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, testing method used, implications of positive and negative results, and notes that the results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Mohammed Ishak B A. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed on April 2, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 24-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, as the test has limitations. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the negative results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Nidhi Subash shows the results of a COVID-19 test. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Mohammed Rafeeq Marathanadi. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test. The test result was positive, indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A positive result suggests a diagnosis of COVID-19, though the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Ashthaf Ali C. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR analysis. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 56-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on January 24, 2022 and reported on January 24, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test. The test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient C K Wasiq was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Nidhi subash rtpcr
This document is a lab report for a COVID-19 RT-PCR test. It indicates that the test for the sample from Miss. Nidhi Subash, a 24-year-old female, came back negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The test was performed at Sankar's Healthcare Scans and Diagnostics in Alappuzha, Kerala, India and analyzed samples from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab using real-time RT-PCR. The report provides background on SARS-CoV-2 and the test methodology, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with clinical observations.
More from Care Reference Laboratory (20)
Recently uploaded
PGx Analysis in VarSeq: A User’s Perspective
Since our release of the PGx capabilities in VarSeq, we’ve had a few months to gather some insights from various use cases. Some users approach PGx workflows by means of array genotyping or what seems to be a growing trend of adding the star allele calling to the existing NGS pipeline for whole genome data. Luckily, both approaches are supported with the VarSeq software platform. The genotyping method being used will also dictate what the scope of the tertiary analysis will be. For example, are your PGx reports a standalone pipeline or would your lab’s goal be to handle a dual-purpose workflow and report on PGx + Diagnostic findings.
The purpose of this webcast is to:
Discuss and demonstrate the approaches with array and NGS genotyping methods for star allele calling to prep for downstream analysis.
Following genotyping, explore alternative tertiary workflow concepts in VarSeq to handle PGx reporting.
Moreover, we will include insights users will need to consider when validating their PGx workflow for all possible star alleles and options you have for automating your PGx analysis for large number of samples. Please join us for a session dedicated to the application of star allele genotyping and subsequent PGx workflows in our VarSeq software.
Public Health Lecture 4 Social Sciences and Public Health
Sociology, Anthropology and Psychology as applied to Public Health
What are the different types of Dental implants.
Are you looking for a long-lasting solution to your missing tooth?
Dental implants are the most common type of method for replacing the missing tooth. Unlike dentures or bridges, implants are surgically placed in the jawbone. In layman’s terms, a dental implant is similar to the natural root of the tooth. It offers a stable foundation for the artificial tooth giving it the look, feel, and function similar to the natural tooth.
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Fallopian tube blockage may cause female infertility. For treatment, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can be a solution.
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
This quiz was conducted as a promotional event for the 2024 Annual Meet of Kerala Chapter of API.
More than 20 participants took part everyday !
Foundation of Yoga, YCB Level-3, Unit-1
Unit -1 of Yoga certification board, level 3, all topics covered. An exam conducted by ministry of Ayush for yoga enthusiastic students.
Giloy in Ayurveda - Classical Categorization and Synonyms
Giloy, also known as Guduchi or Amrita in classical Ayurvedic texts, is a revered herb renowned for its myriad health benefits. It is categorized as a Rasayana, meaning it has rejuvenating properties that enhance vitality and longevity. Giloy is celebrated for its ability to boost the immune system, detoxify the body, and promote overall wellness. Its anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and antioxidant properties make it a staple in managing conditions like fever, diabetes, and stress. The versatility and efficacy of Giloy in supporting health naturally highlight its importance in Ayurveda. At Planet Ayurveda, we provide a comprehensive range of health services and 100% herbal supplements that harness the power of natural ingredients like Giloy. Our products are globally available and affordable, ensuring that everyone can benefit from the ancient wisdom of Ayurveda. If you or your loved ones are dealing with health issues, contact Planet Ayurveda at 01725214040 to book an online video consultation with our professional doctors. Let us help you achieve optimal health and wellness naturally.
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Challenges associated with ageing from a public health perspective
Nano-gold for Cancer Therapy chemistry investigatory project
chemistry investigatory project
The development of nanogold-based cancer therapy could revolutionize oncology by providing a more targeted, less invasive treatment option. This project contributes to the growing body of research aimed at harnessing nanotechnology for medical applications, paving the way for future clinical trials and potential commercial applications.
Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, prompting the need for innovative treatment methods. Nanotechnology offers promising new approaches, including the use of gold nanoparticles (nanogold) for targeted cancer therapy. Nanogold particles possess unique physical and chemical properties that make them suitable for drug delivery, imaging, and photothermal therapy.
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdfChulalongkorn Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group
Pollen and Fungal allergy
Presented by Chaloemchai Chumsaengchotsakul, MD.
June 14, 2024KENT'S REPERTORY by dr niranjan mohanty.pptx
its a presentation on Dr kents Repertory by Dr niranjan Mohanty
5 Effective Homeopathic Medicines for Irregular Periods
Discover the benefits of homeopathic medicine for irregular periods with our guide on 5 common remedies. Learn how these natural treatments can help regulate menstrual cycles and improve overall menstrual health.
Visit Us: https://drdeepikashomeopathy.com/service/irregular-periods-treatment/
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis - Pathogenesis , Clinical Features & Manage...
In this presentation , SBP ( spontaneous bacterial peritonitis ) , which is a common complication in patients with cirrhosis and ascites is described in detail.
The reference for this presentation is Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Textbook ( 11th edition ).
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
une 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
acne vulgaris -Mpharm (2nd semester) Cosmetics and cosmeceuticals
cosmetics and cosmeceuticals
Muskan
mpharm
2nd semester
Guru Gobind Singh college of pharmacy, yamunanagar, haryana
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptx
Indication and installation of a mobile cervical disc prosthesis. Benefits of the PRODISC C VIVO mobile disc prosthesis (Centinel Spine)
Nutritional deficiency disorder in Child
Nutritional deficiency Disorder are problems in india.
It is very important to learn about Indian child's nutritional parameters as well the Disease related to alteration in their Nutrition.
Top Travel Vaccinations in Manchester
Travel vaccination in Manchester offers comprehensive immunization services for individuals planning international trips. Expert healthcare providers administer vaccines tailored to your destination, ensuring you stay protected against various diseases. Conveniently located clinics and flexible appointment options make it easy to get the necessary shots before your journey. Stay healthy and travel with confidence by getting vaccinated in Manchester. Visit us: www.nxhealthcare.co.uk
Recently uploaded (20)
Public Health Lecture 4 Social Sciences and Public Health
Public Health Lecture 4 Social Sciences and Public Health
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
Giloy in Ayurveda - Classical Categorization and Synonyms
Giloy in Ayurveda - Classical Categorization and Synonyms
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Nano-gold for Cancer Therapy chemistry investigatory project
Nano-gold for Cancer Therapy chemistry investigatory project
5 Effective Homeopathic Medicines for Irregular Periods
5 Effective Homeopathic Medicines for Irregular Periods
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis - Pathogenesis , Clinical Features & Manage...
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis - Pathogenesis , Clinical Features & Manage...
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
acne vulgaris -Mpharm (2nd semester) Cosmetics and cosmeceuticals
acne vulgaris -Mpharm (2nd semester) Cosmetics and cosmeceuticals
Rtpcr
- 1. LABORATORY REPORT : P135671 : 11/12/2021 1 :18 PM : 11/12/2021 1 :42 PM : 12/12/2021 3 :09 PM : Patient ID Registered On Collected On Reported On External Id : Jawad Rahees : V134277 : 24 Y/ M Name Visit No Age/Gender Ref By Aadhar Card DOB : Kalarikkal X ray, Ramanattukara : XXXX XXXX XXXX : DDMMYYYY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORT Test Name : COVID 19 SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR ICMR Registration Number: CARREFLABVKK SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction TEST RESULT SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE Specimen Type : Method : Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab RTPCR This Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test intended to use for the qualitative detection of a novel corona virus which was identified in 2019 at Wuhan City, Hubei province, China in upper respiratory tract specimens and lower respiratory tract specimens of infected people. Pathogen information : Corona viruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS -CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. Interpretation : A "POSITIVE" result indicates that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is present in the given sample and suggests the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Test result should always be considered in the context of patient's clinical history, physical examination, and epidemiologic exposures. A "NEGATIVE" result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is not present in the patient's given specimen. Result should be correlated with patient’s history and clinical presentation. However it does not rule out the infection completely and should not be used as the sole basis for making decisions related to treatment and other patient management decisions. A false negative may resulted due to inadequate number of organisms are present in the specimen due to improper collection, transport or handling Note: The results relate only to the specimens tested and should be correlated with clinical findings Interpretation guidance: 1. Testing of referred clinical specimens was considered on the basis of request/referral received from/ through state surveillance officer(SSO) of concerned State Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme / any other health care facility affirming requirements of the case definition/s 2.A single negative test result, particularly if this is from an upper respiratory tract specimen, does not exclude infection 3.A positive test result is only tentative, and will be reconfirmed by retesting. 4.Repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimen is strongly recommended in severe or progressive disease. The repeat specimens may be considered after a gap of 2-4 days after the collection of the first specimen for additional testing if required 5.A positive alternate pathogen does not necessarily rule out either, as little is yet known about the role of coinfections *** End of Report *** Page 1 of 1 Dr. Ronald A Roche MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist Dr. Reshmi Gopalakrishnan MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist