Causes of mode effects
on survey measurement
One day symposium at the Royal Statistical Society, London
11 October 2011
Background
Background

• Increasing use of mixed modes
   • Falling response rates
   • Rising costs of data collection
• Risk of reduced data comparability
   • Coverage error
   • Non-response error
   • Measurement error
• Need for practical advice to inform decisions
  about when to mix modes and how
Mixing Modes and Measurement Error

• Funded under the ESRC Survey Design and
  Measurement Initiative
• 3-year contract starting 1 Oct 2007
• Collaboration between NatCen, ISER and
  independent survey methods consultant
Core research team

• National Centre for Social Research (NatCen)
   •   Gerry Nicolaas
   •   Steven Hope (now UCL)
   •   Margaret Blake
   •   Michelle Gray
• Institute for Social & Economic Research (ISER)
   • Peter Lynn
   • Annette Jäckle
• The Survey Coach (Independent Survey Methods Consultant)
   • Pamela Campanelli
Main objective

• Practical advice on how to improve portability of
  questions across modes
   • Which mode combinations are likely to produce
     comparable responses?
   • Which types of questions are more susceptible to
     mode effects?
Research design

• A literature review & framework of mixed modes
   • develop a conceptual framework
   • identify gaps in evidence base and formulate
     hypotheses to address gaps
• Quantitative data analysis
   • test hypotheses using existing datasets and new
     experimental data
• Cognitive interviewing
   • explore how respondents process questions in different
     modes
Presentations & Discussion

1. How and when does the mode of data collection
   affect survey measurement?
2. The use of cognitive interviewing methods to evaluate
   mode effects
3. The role of visual and aural stimuli in producing mode
   effects
4. The role of the interviewer in producing mode effects
5. Is it a good idea to optimise question format for mode
   of data collection?
6. Designing questions for mixed mode surveys
7. Discussant (Patten Smith)
8. Open discussion

Rss Oct 2011 Mixed Modes Pres0

  • 1.
    Causes of modeeffects on survey measurement One day symposium at the Royal Statistical Society, London 11 October 2011
  • 2.
    Background Background • Increasing useof mixed modes • Falling response rates • Rising costs of data collection • Risk of reduced data comparability • Coverage error • Non-response error • Measurement error • Need for practical advice to inform decisions about when to mix modes and how
  • 3.
    Mixing Modes andMeasurement Error • Funded under the ESRC Survey Design and Measurement Initiative • 3-year contract starting 1 Oct 2007 • Collaboration between NatCen, ISER and independent survey methods consultant
  • 4.
    Core research team •National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) • Gerry Nicolaas • Steven Hope (now UCL) • Margaret Blake • Michelle Gray • Institute for Social & Economic Research (ISER) • Peter Lynn • Annette Jäckle • The Survey Coach (Independent Survey Methods Consultant) • Pamela Campanelli
  • 5.
    Main objective • Practicaladvice on how to improve portability of questions across modes • Which mode combinations are likely to produce comparable responses? • Which types of questions are more susceptible to mode effects?
  • 6.
    Research design • Aliterature review & framework of mixed modes • develop a conceptual framework • identify gaps in evidence base and formulate hypotheses to address gaps • Quantitative data analysis • test hypotheses using existing datasets and new experimental data • Cognitive interviewing • explore how respondents process questions in different modes
  • 7.
    Presentations & Discussion 1.How and when does the mode of data collection affect survey measurement? 2. The use of cognitive interviewing methods to evaluate mode effects 3. The role of visual and aural stimuli in producing mode effects 4. The role of the interviewer in producing mode effects 5. Is it a good idea to optimise question format for mode of data collection? 6. Designing questions for mixed mode surveys 7. Discussant (Patten Smith) 8. Open discussion