Action research is a cyclical process of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting to address practical issues in real-world situations. It involves collaborative inquiry by reflective practitioners to improve their practices through a process of self-evaluation and participatory problem-solving. Key elements include working on participants' own problems, seeking to improve practice, being collaborative and participatory, taking a problem-solving approach, being undertaken in real-world contexts, and involving ongoing cycles of diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation.
Dam engineering: Building water reservoirs (either elevated or not) in cities in 21rst century urbanism of green cities is much more friendly than dam engineering)
Yes systems engineering, you are a disciplineJoseph KAsser
Systems engineering is currently characterized by conflicting and contradictory opinions on its nature. The paper begins by describing the evolution of systems engineering in the National Council on Systems Engineering (NCOSE)/ International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) and the difficulty in defining and differentiating systems engineering as a discipline. The paper then identifies and discusses six different and somewhat contradictory camps or perspectives of systems engineering. After identifying the cause of the contradictions the paper suggests one way to reconcile the camps is to dissolve the problem to distinguish between the activity known as systems engineering and the role of the systems engineer with a return to the old pre-NCOSE systems engineering paradigm. The paper then continues by testing the hypothesis and shows that systems engineering is a discipline that can be differentiated from other disciplines. However, it is not a traditional engineering discipline.
Presentation on using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping in social-ecological research. Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping is a procedure to involve stakeholders in research or management processes and a method to extract and analyze different kinds of knowledge about complex systems and their functioning.
Mike Powell, Director of IKM Emergent, a research programme looking at the use of information and knowledge in the international development sector, shares his notes on his presentation about the use of the semantic web in diplomacy.
Actionable Metrics at Production Scale - LSPE Meetup June 27, 2012SOASTA
Presentation to Large Scale Production Engineering meetup at Yahoo campus on June 27, 2012. Dan Bartow, VP Product Management at SOASTA discussed critical performance metrics.
Dam engineering: Building water reservoirs (either elevated or not) in cities in 21rst century urbanism of green cities is much more friendly than dam engineering)
Yes systems engineering, you are a disciplineJoseph KAsser
Systems engineering is currently characterized by conflicting and contradictory opinions on its nature. The paper begins by describing the evolution of systems engineering in the National Council on Systems Engineering (NCOSE)/ International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) and the difficulty in defining and differentiating systems engineering as a discipline. The paper then identifies and discusses six different and somewhat contradictory camps or perspectives of systems engineering. After identifying the cause of the contradictions the paper suggests one way to reconcile the camps is to dissolve the problem to distinguish between the activity known as systems engineering and the role of the systems engineer with a return to the old pre-NCOSE systems engineering paradigm. The paper then continues by testing the hypothesis and shows that systems engineering is a discipline that can be differentiated from other disciplines. However, it is not a traditional engineering discipline.
Presentation on using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping in social-ecological research. Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping is a procedure to involve stakeholders in research or management processes and a method to extract and analyze different kinds of knowledge about complex systems and their functioning.
Mike Powell, Director of IKM Emergent, a research programme looking at the use of information and knowledge in the international development sector, shares his notes on his presentation about the use of the semantic web in diplomacy.
Actionable Metrics at Production Scale - LSPE Meetup June 27, 2012SOASTA
Presentation to Large Scale Production Engineering meetup at Yahoo campus on June 27, 2012. Dan Bartow, VP Product Management at SOASTA discussed critical performance metrics.
Back To The Grassroots – CED and Building Local PowerRaïmi Osseni
This workshop explores changes in dominant CED theory and practice from earlier visions linked to traditions of grassroots community organizing and building citizens' power at the local
level to a narrower entrepreneurial and technical intervention. What are the implications of these
changes? Are there practices and organizations that embody the two approaches? What does community organizing have to do with CED?
Eric Shragge, School of Community and Public Affairs, Concordia University
Raimi Osseni, CCEDNet Emerging Leaders
Managing dyadic interaction in organizational leadership
Foundation of Dyadic Approach.
Investigation strategies.
Measuring Dyadic Quality of Interaction.
Compatibility as a Determinants of Dyadic Interactions.
Behavioral Consequences of Quality of Interaction.
Dyadic Interactions: Making the Connections.
Role development and the leader.
A presentation prepared for 30% of the final grade of a course. This describes food fraud activities that occur in the EU and features a particular case that was brought to light in food fraud with marine resources.
The ninth KM Australia Congress - http://www.kmaustralia.com
KM Australia Congress: An Academy of Knowledge Management and Content
Social Media and Collaboration
Change Management and Culture
Learning and Performance
Content and Information Management
Communication and Leadership
Take part in conversations with:
University of Oxford
United Nations Development Programme (Thai land)
US Army
Wood Group PSN
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Bangkok University
Strategic Knowledge Solutions
Working Knowledge CSP
Glentworth
Genea
Hunter Water
Department of Primary Industry (VIC)
Ezypay
Cancer Counci l Austral ia
NSW Treasury
Ernst & Young
Creative Reflection: The Critical Practice of Stepping Backchar booth
Reflective practice is the process of actively observing, understanding, and shaping pedagogy. Its associated skills include developing individual insight into the impact and practice of education through critical analysis, instructional design, theoretical grounding, and dialogue with peer educators. Also integral is gathering insight into the learner experience through meaningful assessment. Less often discussed is the role of creativity, experimentation, learner engagement, and the disruption of ingrained teaching habits and/or narratives; this keynote will explore strategies for cultivating a more holistic reflective practice in service of enriching and diversifying one’s teaching.
Social media & web analytics innovation procopio-2012-04Michael Procopio
My presentation from the Social media & web analytics innovation conference April 2012 in San Francisco put on by theiegroup.com.
I cover examples of gaining insights on products from social media conversations
Back To The Grassroots – CED and Building Local PowerRaïmi Osseni
This workshop explores changes in dominant CED theory and practice from earlier visions linked to traditions of grassroots community organizing and building citizens' power at the local
level to a narrower entrepreneurial and technical intervention. What are the implications of these
changes? Are there practices and organizations that embody the two approaches? What does community organizing have to do with CED?
Eric Shragge, School of Community and Public Affairs, Concordia University
Raimi Osseni, CCEDNet Emerging Leaders
Managing dyadic interaction in organizational leadership
Foundation of Dyadic Approach.
Investigation strategies.
Measuring Dyadic Quality of Interaction.
Compatibility as a Determinants of Dyadic Interactions.
Behavioral Consequences of Quality of Interaction.
Dyadic Interactions: Making the Connections.
Role development and the leader.
A presentation prepared for 30% of the final grade of a course. This describes food fraud activities that occur in the EU and features a particular case that was brought to light in food fraud with marine resources.
The ninth KM Australia Congress - http://www.kmaustralia.com
KM Australia Congress: An Academy of Knowledge Management and Content
Social Media and Collaboration
Change Management and Culture
Learning and Performance
Content and Information Management
Communication and Leadership
Take part in conversations with:
University of Oxford
United Nations Development Programme (Thai land)
US Army
Wood Group PSN
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Bangkok University
Strategic Knowledge Solutions
Working Knowledge CSP
Glentworth
Genea
Hunter Water
Department of Primary Industry (VIC)
Ezypay
Cancer Counci l Austral ia
NSW Treasury
Ernst & Young
Creative Reflection: The Critical Practice of Stepping Backchar booth
Reflective practice is the process of actively observing, understanding, and shaping pedagogy. Its associated skills include developing individual insight into the impact and practice of education through critical analysis, instructional design, theoretical grounding, and dialogue with peer educators. Also integral is gathering insight into the learner experience through meaningful assessment. Less often discussed is the role of creativity, experimentation, learner engagement, and the disruption of ingrained teaching habits and/or narratives; this keynote will explore strategies for cultivating a more holistic reflective practice in service of enriching and diversifying one’s teaching.
Social media & web analytics innovation procopio-2012-04Michael Procopio
My presentation from the Social media & web analytics innovation conference April 2012 in San Francisco put on by theiegroup.com.
I cover examples of gaining insights on products from social media conversations
2. STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER
• Defining action research
• Principles and characteristics of action
research
• Participatory action research
• Action research as critical praxis
• Action research and complexity theory
• Procedures for action research
• Reporting action research
• Reflexivity in action research
• Some practical and theoretical matters
3. ACTION RESEARCH
• Action research is a small-scale intervention
in the functioning of the real world to address
practitioners’ own issues, and a close
examination of the effects of such an
intervention.
• Kemmis and McTaggart (1992: 10):
– ‘to do action research is to plan, act,
observe and reflect more carefully, more
systematically, and more rigorously than
one usually does in everyday life’.
• Action research combines diagnosis, action
and reflection.
4. ACTION RESEARCH COMBINES 6 NOTIONS
1. A straightforward cycle of: identifying a
problem, planning an intervention,
implementing the intervention,
evaluating the outcome;
2. Reflective practice;
3. Political emancipation;
4. Critical theory;
5. Professional development; and
6. Participatory practitioner research.
5. ELEMENTS OF ACTION RESEARCH
• It works on participants’ own problems;
• It seeks to improve practice;
• It is collaborative and participatory;
• It is problem-solving;
• It is undertaken in situ;
• It is an ongoing cycle of diagnosis, planning,
implementation and evaluation;
• It is methodologically eclectic;
• It requires reflection;
• It builds on professional development.
6. ACTION RESEARCH IS . . .
• Critical (and self-critical) collaborative
inquiry by
• Reflective practitioners being
• Accountable and making results of their
enquiry public
• Self-evaluating their practice and
engaged in
• Participatory problem-solving and
continuing professional development.
7. PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH
• It commences with explicit social and political intentions
that articulate with the dominated and poor classes and
groups in society;
• It involves popular participation in the research process;
• It regards knowledge as an agent of social
transformation as a whole, constituting a critique of
those views of knowledge (theory) as separate from
practice;
• Its epistemological base is rooted in critical theory and
its critique of the subject/object relations in research;
• It engages issues of power;
• It raises the consciousness of individuals and groups;
• It is a democratic activity.
8. ACTION RESEARCH AS CRITICAL PRAXIS
• The emancipatory interest of Habermas:
to understand and change the world
• Ideology critique and action
• People taking control of their own lives
• A challenge to the illegitimate operation
of power
• A concern for equality and social justice
• Empowerment of individuals and groups
9. CRITICISMS OF ACTION RESEARCH
AS CRITICAL PRAXIS
• It is uncritical and self-contradicting;
• It will promote conformity through slavish
adherence to its orthodoxies;
• It is naïve in its understanding of groups and
celebrates groups over individuals;
• It privileges its own view of science (rejecting
objectivity) and lacks modesty;
• It privileges the authority of critical theory;
• It is elitist whilst purporting to serve egalitarianism;
• It assumes an undifferentiated view of action
research;
• It attempts to colonize and redirect action
research.
10. THE ACTION RESEARCH CYCLE
T h e n P la n
R e s e a r c h I m p le m e n t
A c tio n
and
M o n ito r
F ir s t A c tio n
P la n Act
P la n a c tio n thoughtfully
A c tio n (to g e th e r )
Reconnaissance
(First Cycle) R e fle c t
E v a lu a te R e s e a r c h F ir s t
(o n A c tio n )
a c tio n a c tio n P r o d u c e
D a ta
and
R e v ie w
(R e s e a r c h )
P r o c e s s T h e n
(s e p a r a te ly A n a ly s e
a n d to g e th e r ) D a ta
(Tripp, 2003)
11. IDENTIFY THE PROBLEM –
CAUSES NOT SYMPTOMS
Diagnosis:
• What actually is the real problem?
• What are the causes?
12. PLAN INTERVENTIONS
Divergent Phase:
• What actions are possible?
• What alternatives are there?
• Evaluate alternatives.
Convergent Phase:
• Which intervention will be adopted?
• Decide from amongst the alternatives.
Planning:
• How will the intervention be implemented?
13. IMPLEMENTATION
Putting the plan into action
• Initiation
• Development
• Sustenance
• Follow-up
14. EVALUATION
How successfully has the intervention
addressed the issue?
• What are the success criteria?
• How will you know if the intervention has been
successful?
• What are the outcomes of the intervention?
• What ongoing monitoring will there be?
• What will you do if the intervention is not
working?
15. REFLEXIVITY IN ACTION RESEARCH
• A self-conscious awareness of the
effects that the participants-as-
practitioners-and-researchers are having
on the research process, how their
values, attitudes, perceptions, opinions,
actions, feelings etc. are influencing the
situation being studied.
• How the researcher/practitioner may be
biasing the research.