Relevancy of evidence under Section 6 of Evidence Act 1950Intan Muhammad
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
Relevancy of evidence under section 14, 15, 16 of Evidence Act 1950 (2017-2018)Intan Muhammad
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Relevancy of evidence under Section 6 of Evidence Act 1950Intan Muhammad
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
Relevancy of evidence under section 14, 15, 16 of Evidence Act 1950 (2017-2018)Intan Muhammad
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
ACTIONABLE CLAIMS in Property Law (Unit-1)KHUSHISWAMI2
An actionable claim is defined in the Transfer of Property Act (TPA), which deals with the transfer of properties in India. According to Section 3 of the TPA. This PPT explains the topic in a better way
‘Remoteness’ refers to the test of causation that is used to determine the loss caused by a breach of contract. It limits the ability of the plaintiff to recover damages to not too remote losses
Validity of contingent and conditional bequests Utkarsh Kumar
Introduction – ‘Vest’ meaning and differences
Contingent Bequests
Conditional Bequests
Validity of conditions subsequent & forfeiture of bequest – with reference to S. 134
Defeasance clause – distinguished from repugnant clause
Conclusion
ACTIONABLE CLAIMS in Property Law (Unit-1)KHUSHISWAMI2
An actionable claim is defined in the Transfer of Property Act (TPA), which deals with the transfer of properties in India. According to Section 3 of the TPA. This PPT explains the topic in a better way
‘Remoteness’ refers to the test of causation that is used to determine the loss caused by a breach of contract. It limits the ability of the plaintiff to recover damages to not too remote losses
Validity of contingent and conditional bequests Utkarsh Kumar
Introduction – ‘Vest’ meaning and differences
Contingent Bequests
Conditional Bequests
Validity of conditions subsequent & forfeiture of bequest – with reference to S. 134
Defeasance clause – distinguished from repugnant clause
Conclusion
Introduces commercial law, its history and development alongside its principles. Also explains African and Islamic commercial law as distinct legal systems for commercial dealings. The slides also introduce the Sale of Goods Act (UK, 1979)
Debt Restructuring and Cross Class Cram Down rule.pptxLyla Latif
These slides consider debt restructuring; its conditions and key stages, and the CCCD (cross-class cram down) rule through which a restructuring plan can at the discretion of the court be imposed on an entire class of dissenting creditors or members. Several restructuring plans are examined modelled along equity preservation, equity dilution and other options set out under the UK's Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020.
This is a course outline that I prepared for teaching at the University of Nairobi. Content is built around discussion the meaning and types of pensions available, their regulatory framework, examining pension issues as part of human right and employment laws.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
2. Content
What are RoT clauses
Their extent
Their purpose
When can an action based on RoT clauses arise?
Rules guiding the judicial interpretation of RoT clauses
Who has the right to bring a claim on a RoT clause?
RoT forms under SOGA, 1979
Legal cases recognizing RoT clauses
Different types of RoT clauses
RoT restrictions
Drafting a comprehensive RoT clause
3. What are RoT clauses?
• A RoT clause is also referred to as a reservation of title or Romalpa clause.
• Retention of title clauses in essence are conditions in contracts for the sale of goods which purport
to retain ownership or property in goods until the occurrence of one or more specified events,
usually, the payment to the seller of the purchase price or other monies owing.
• Permits the seller to retain the legal title in the goods after delivering the goods to the buyer, and
until the buyer pays the entire price of the goods.
• FG Wilson (Engineering) Ltd v John Holt & Co (Liverpool) Ltd (2014) -W was a manufacturer
and seller of generators and parts. W in signing a contract with J inserted a RoT clause providing
that title to the purchased goods did not pass until Holt had paid in full.
4. Extent of RoT
clauses
• A RoT can take several forms: the contract may
include a clause entitling the seller to either
retain title in:
the goods he supplies
any product manufactured from the goods -
Clough Mill v Martin (1985)
be entitled to the proceeds of the
subsequent sale of the goods - Aluminium
Industrie Vaesen BV v Romalpa
Aluminium (1976)
5. Purpose
General
Protects the seller against the
buyer’s default
Enables a seller to deliver
goods to a buyer on the
terms that the seller retains
ownership of the goods until
the buyer has paid the price
Allows physical delivery of
goods to a buyer without
transferring legal ownership
until they have been paid for
Buyer is therefore, in
possession, but does not own
them (what could be the
implications of this? recall sec
18, sec 12)
Gives seller priority over
secured and unsecured
creditors of the buyer who
becomes insolvent by
reclaiming possession of the
goods
Allows the seller to retake
possession of goods from the
buyer
Specific
• Other obligations can be included in a RoT
clause to ensure that repossession, if
necessary, is made as easy as possible. These
could include obligations for the buyer to:
• store the goods separately from goods
belonging to third parties;
• mark the goods as the seller's property;
• allow the seller access to the buyer's
premises to verify that the obligations are
being complied with.
6. When can an action based on RoT clause
arise?
First, it would depend on whether the clause has been incorporated into the contract as an express term (RoT is
NOT an implied term)
The buyer has defaulted on payment of the purchase price, or is insolvent
Crucial to the enforceability of every retention of title clause is that the party claiming the goods is able to
identify them. If it cannot do so, then the claim will fail. It is for the seller to identify which individual items held
by the buyer have not been paid for and if the seller cannot pick out the particular items then he or she will be
unable to claim them.
7. Rules guiding the judicial interpretation of RoT
clauses
• When it comes to interpreting retention of title clauses the following should be borne in
mind:
a. The court will generally give effect to the plain meaning of the words - Hendy
Lennox (Industrial Engines) Ltd v Grahame Puttick (1984).
b. The court will not discard the plain meaning of the words unless within the four
corners of the contract it can find other language and stipulations to deprive a term of
its plain meaning – Re: Bond Worth Ltd (1979).
c. The court is bound to look at the entire retention of title clause – Re: Bond Worth
Ltd (1979).
d. The purpose of a retention clause will not predetermine the legal form of protection
agreed upon or its legal consequences. Consequently, the purpose of providing
security does not necessarily mean that a security interest is created – Clough Mill v
Martin (1985)
e. Equity will look at the substance and reality of the transaction to determine whether a
charge has been created - Compaq Computers Ltd v Abercorn Group Ltd (1991)
8. Who has the right to bring a claim based on a RoT
clause?
Section 38 (1) The seller of goods is an unpaid seller within the meaning of
this Act—
(a) when the whole of the price has not been paid or tendered;
(b) when a bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument has been
received as conditional payment, and the condition on which it was
received has not been fulfilled by reason of the dishonour of the
instrument or otherwise.
(2) In this Part of this Act “seller” includes any person who is in the position
of a seller, as, for instance, an agent of the seller to whom the bill of lading
has been endorsed, or a consignor or agent who has himself paid (or is
directly responsible for) the price.
9. RoT forms under SOGA, 1979
Section 39 Unpaid seller’s rights
(1) Subject to this and any other Act, notwithstanding that the property in the goods may have passed to the
buyer, the unpaid seller of goods, as such, has by implication of law—
(a) a lien on the goods or right to retain them for the price while he is in possession of them;
(b) in case of the insolvency of the buyer, a right of stopping the goods in transit after he has parted with
the possession of them;
(c) a right of re-sale as limited by this Act.
(2) Where the property in goods has not passed to the buyer, the unpaid seller has (in addition to his other
remedies) a right of withholding delivery similar to and co-extensive with his rights of lien or retention and
stoppage in transit where the property has passed to the buyer.
10. Sections 17, 19
It starts with section 17 – intention – what have the parties intended? That
property will pass only at the payment of the price? Is this what they
intended? If so, then look to section 19
Section 19 – contract of sale of specific goods or where goods are later
appropriated to the contract, the seller may reserve the right of disposal of
the goods until certain conditions are fulfilled. In this instance, even if
goods are delivered to the buyer, property is retained by the seller
11. Key cases: Romalpa
• Aluminium Industrie Vaesen BV v Romalpa Aluminium (1976)
• In that case, aluminium foil had been sold subject to a clause that provided:
‘that the goods remained the property of the seller until all sums due to them where discharged, that goods manufactured by the
buyer from the seller’s foil would become the property of the seller as surety for full payment and that until full payment had been
made, the sellers would keep such articles in their capacity of fiduciary owners for the sellers and they had the power to sell such
articles to third parties in the normal course of their business’
• It was anticipated that the foil would be used in the buyers manufacturing process but in fact it was sold onto a third party. The
Court of Appeal held that a fiduciary relationship existed between the seller and the buyer. On the basis of this relationship
Romalpa was entitled to trace into the proceeds of the sale and the buyer was obliged to account for those monies. The decision in
the Romalpa case is less one on retention of title than on a claim to the proceeds of sale. But it is our starting point. Romalpa
only succeeded because:
There was a fiduciary relationship between the seller and the buyer
That the buyer as a result held the goods as the seller’s bailee
12. Key cases: Clough Mill
• The leading case on retention of title is probably the
Court of Appeal case Clough Mill v Martin (1985).
• In this case the seller had sold yarn to the buyer who
intended to make fabric from it. The contract of sale
provided that the property in the yarn remained with the
seller until paid for. The buyer was however permitted to
use the yarn in its manufacturing process and the seller
was accordingly to become the owner of any product
made from the yarn supplied by them.
13. Different types of RoT
BASIC CLAUSE/SIMPLE
CLAUSE
ALL MONIES CLAUSE (ALL
LIABILITIES CLAUSE)
14. Basic/simple
clauses
• A simple clause provides that property shall be retained pending
payment for the particular goods.
• Simple clauses will only be effective if they reserve the right thing.
That is, the words employed must make clear that both beneficial
and legal property and or ownership is retained and not one or the
other.
• In the absence of clarity the court may conclude that the parties
intended property to pass on delivery, subject to an immediate grant
of a security interest, which may be void against a liquidator or lose
priority for want of registration. The importance of the warning was
well illustrated in:
Re Bond Worth in which the seller sought to reserve equitable
and beneficial ownership. The use of this term was interpreted by
Slade J to conclude that the legal title was conveyed to the buyer
with a grant back of security by way of charge. Whilst it was
open to the court to conclude from the circumstances that the
clear intention was to retain property and ownership the fact
remains that the failure to use appropriate words may result in the
clause being ineffective.
15. All monies clause
• These clauses go into further detail than simple/basic RoT clauses. They
state:
• B will not get ownership of the goods bought until purchase price is paid, as well as all monies
or liabilities owed to the seller have been paid
• Such clauses are usually seen in the context of delivery by instalment or
where the B is a regular purchaser of the seller’s product and receives
consignments intermittently.
• An all monies clause means that where a buyer had paid in full for a
particular delivery of goods, they would not own them if they still owed
money in respect of another consignment of goods. All monies clauses do
not lead to the creation of a charge over the goods – Armour V Thyssen
(1991).
• The problem centres around whether the RoT clause can allow the seller to
repossess the goods, in our example: the sofas that have been manufactured
using the nylon. A retention of title clause does in a sense give security, it
does so by a legitimate retention of title and not by virtue of any right being
conferred by the buyer upon the seller.
16. RoT restrictions
• Goods losing their identity
• Ambiguous RoT clauses can result in the
creation of a charge
• Sub sales by the buyer
• Creation of a fiduciary relationship
• Fixtures
17. Goods losing
their identity
1/4
• Raw materials supplied will lose their identity in the course of
manufacture. If this should happen the sellers title may be extinguished.
• Borden (UK) v Scottish Timber Products (1981), resin was supplied for
the manufacture of chipboard. This was subsequently combined with
wood chips to make the chipboard. It was held that pursuant to the
intention of the parties, the seller’s title ceased once it was used in the
manufacturing process.
• Hendy Lennox (Industrial Engines) v Grahame Puttick (1984),
engines were attached to generate a unit and while it took several hours to
separate the two they were separately identifiable and hence the sellers
title was not extinguished. This is because an action based on RoT clause
can only arise where the party claiming the goods is able to identify
them. If it cannot do so, then the claim will fail. It is for the seller to
identify which individual items held by the buyer have not been paid for
and if the seller cannot pick out the particular items, then he or she
will be unable to claim them.
18. Goods losing
their identity -
2/4
Mixed goods
• Issues usually crop up over RoT clauses with respect to goods that have been
sold to the buyer and have subsequently been mixed so that the original goods
partially or totally lose their identity by becoming a component or ingredient
in a larger or new item. Examples of a few cases:
• Resin being incorporated into chipboard- Borden (UK) Ltd versus Scottish Timber Products
Ltd (1979)
• Leather being made into handbags – Re Peachdart Ltd (1984): S sold leather to P. P used it to
manufacture handbags. The contract stated that ownership of the leather and of any mixed goods
using this leather would remain with S until full payment. P became broke and went into
liquidation. Held: although S could reserve title over the leather sold, they could not do so over
the finished goods as the leather sold had changed its identity once it had been made into
handbags.
• Sheets of cardboard used in manufacturing cardboard boxes – Modelboard Ltd v Outer Box
Ltd (1993)
• Yarn into fabric – Re Andrabell limited
• Grapes into wine - Winegrapes Marketing Board for the City of Griffith v Griffith Vintner's
Ltd (1989)
19. Goods losing
their identity
3/4
Exceptions
• Engines attached to generators - Hendy Lennox (1984):
engine sold had been incorporated into the buyer’s generating
set, the engine could be repossessed by seller after buyer went
into liquidation because:
o It remained an engine throughout
o Could be easily identified by its serial number as
belonging to the seller
o Could be dismantled with ease from the finished product
• The issue with mixed goods is whether the seller can
effectively retain title to the mixed goods without creating a
security interest by the way of charge? The short answer seems
to be that S cannot, although it is often a question of degree of
admixture.
20. Goods losing their identity 4/4
Right to mixed goods
First, where there is no reference to mixed
goods in the clause – the answer would
depend on analysing:
o Resin being incorporated into chipboard-
Borden (UK) Ltd versus Scottish
Timber Products Ltd (1979)
o Engines attached to generators - Hendy
Lennox (1984)
o Leather being made into handbags – Re
Peachdart Ltd (1984)
o Yarn into fabric – Re Andrabell limited
o Grapes into wine - Winegrapes
Marketing Board for the City of
Griffith v Griffith Vintner's Ltd (1989)
Secondly, where the clause specifically seeks to retain property in the newly
manufactured product.
Provided a fiduciary relationship can be established then the seller may be able to
trace the goods into the new products. If however as a result of the mixing process
the goods have lost their identity, then they have ceased to exist and S has nothing
to trace - Borden UK Ltd.
Consequently, the question is whether the identity of the goods has been lost, the
answer to which will of course, depend on the circumstances of the case and
maybe a question of degree.
o What can be said is that if the goods are simply affixed, the items do not lose
their identity, they will be recoverable - Hendy Lennox (1984)
o However, where they become inseparable components, with identity being
partially or substantially lost, then the claim will be unlikely to succeed. Re
Peachdart Ltd (1984) - might be regarded as a borderline case and involved
leather being converted into handbags. It was held that the seller did not
retain property in the handbags. In Hendy Lennox, the court allowed
property to be retained in engines which were affixed to generator sets but
could be removed by a straightforward mechanical process.
21. Ambiguous RoT clause can
result in the creation of a
charge
• The importance of this was well illustrated in Re Bond Worth (1979)
in which the seller sought to reserve equitable and beneficial
ownership. The use of this term meant that the legal title was
conveyed to the buyer with a grant back of security by way of charge.
• In the Clough Mill case it was held that the clause in question did not
create a charge all over the company's property, since the property
never passed to the buyer in the first place. Accordingly, it seems that
on the bare facts of it a clause providing that the property in goods
shall not pass until payment of the price will be operative as a RoT
clause and not a charge.
22. Sub sales by the buyer
• In many cases RoT clauses will relate to contracts with a buyer who onsells
the goods in the ordinary course of business. The clause will either be
silent on this aspect or expressly provide that goods can be sold in the
ordinary course of business.
• In the latter case, the seller will have no claim against the sub purchaser
and the issue will remain as to whether property passed at the time of sub
sale or if not whether the seller has any entitlement to the proceeds.
• Where the RoT clause is silent on this issue the courts will readily imply a
term allowing the buyer to onsell the goods in the ordinary course of
business. Hendy Lennox Ltd v Grahame Puttick Ltd (1984).
23. Creation of a fiduciary relationship
When does it arise
By the use of the word fiduciary – Aluminium Industrie v
Romalpa
Having a requirement to store goods separately – Re
Andrabell Ltd Airborne Accessories v Goodman (1984)
The requirement to keep proceeds separate – Re Andrabell
(1984)
The use of the word bailee/bailor (this indicates that the
buyer is not selling on its own account. Bailments create
fiduciary relationships. The presumption of a bailment can
be displaced by the existence of a credit period).
When does it not exist
The terms of the contract are against existence of a fiduciary
relationship
Existence of a credit period – Re Andrabell (1984)
Absence of separate storage requirements and separate
proceeds – Re Country Stores Pty Ltd (1987)
Specific reference to proceeds of sale in the contract –
Hendy Lennox Ltd v Grahame Puttick (1984)
Allowing profits to be retained by the buyer. If the clause
allows profit on sub sales to be retained by the buyer then it
suggests that the sale was not for the sellers account but that
the clause created a security over the proceeds only to the
extent of the purchase price and is therefore a charge.
24. Fixtures
• A seller will not be entitled to recover a chattel which has become a fixture
despite an effective RoT clause being in place. Instead, such a retention
clause is held to be a security interest (section 3 of the Chattel Securities
Act).