“EXPLORING INCLUSIVE EDUCATION STRATEGIES AND
CHALLENGES FOR LEARNERS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL
NEEDS: INPUT TO SUSTAINABLE SUPPORT PROGRAMS”
Advisory Committee:
Adviser: ELMER M. ALBALADEJO, EdD
Members: MA. LIDA A. SOLANO, PhD
MARIA SHEILA D. SIMON, EdD
Examining Committee:
MARYBELLE F. AMENAMEN, EdD
MARY ANN D. CERVAS, EdD
NEDY S. COLDOVERO, PhD
HAZEL D. JOAQUIN, PhD
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Researcher
JOHNEL A. PANTIA
FINAL ORAL DEFENSE PRESENTATION
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Methodological Perspectives
As one of the various approaches in qualitative narrative research
methodology, interpretive description design focuses on the formation of a
description. It moves this description beyond the clear evidence to probe for further
relationships and patterns within an experience (Thorne, 2008). Interpretive
description, which was developed by Thorne, Reimer Kirkham, and MacDonald-
Emes, helps address complex research questions seen as important to health
disciplines that are not fully addressed by other conventional qualitative
methodologies. Moreover, every individual perceives, interprets and experiences a
situation or phenomenon of interest from one point of view, since individual has
different experiences of reality (Polit & Beck, 2008 as cited by Crispolon, 2023).
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Context of the Study
This qualitative study was based on the in-depth interviews from public
elementary school heads, teachers and parents in the District of Sapian for this school
year 2024-2025.
An interview is a qualitative research technique that involves question-based
data collection. Interviews enable the interviewers to interact and engage with the
participants while also providing accurate and reliable results. An unstructured
interview was used in this study to let the participants feel at ease. Questions were
mostly open-ended and not arranged in order. Participants have more freedom to
express themselves and elaborate on their answers. In order for the interviewer to
review and evaluate the responses, tools such as paper, pen, and audio and video
recorder were used.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Context of the Study
Another research tool that was used in this study is observation because it is
easy to execute and yields highly reliable data. It involved the researcher observing
people interacting in either a controlled or uncontrolled environment. In this instance,
uncontrolled or naturalistic observation was employed to preserve and investigate the
participants’ spontaneous behavior in a natural setting. The researcher only wrote
down what they observed and how they interpreted it.
Moreover, to obtain the participants’ perception of the phenomena, an in-depth
interview with semi-structured open-ended questions were prepared. This strategy was
a subjective investigative method that includes conducting serious personal interviews
with a small number of respondents to investigate their viewpoints on a specific
thought, program, or circumstance (Boyce and Neale 2006 as cited by Crispolon,
2023). Further, this technique draws out detailed information, issues, and context
arising from the perceptions of the participants giving out a comprehensive
presentation of the whole experience.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Context of the Study
Further, this technique draws out detailed information, issues, and context
arising from the perceptions of the participants giving out a comprehensive
presentation of the whole experience.
Furthermore, to reinforce and substantiate the qualitative data, an in-depth
interview will be undertaken. The researcher purposively selected the interview
participants, who are public elementary school teachers and parents of the target
participants of the study, to represent a broad and deep scope of insights into the
inclusive education for learners with disabilities of public elementary school teachers
in their practices and challenges.
Thus, an in-depth interview was utilized as a subjective technique since it is most
fitting for circumstances in which the investigator needs to ask open-ended questions
that inspire the significance of information from by and large few people (Guion, et
al, 2011 as cited by Peniano, 2023).
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Context of the Study
Twelve unrestricted questions were asked to explore and expound participants’
thoughts and perspectives about inclusive education for learners with special
educational needs and its effect on their practices and challenges. Probes were used to
follow up on the answers of the participants.
For the researcher to gather data, researcher-made questions have been
formulated based on the statement of the problem. These questions were asked to the
participants in three semi-structured interviews. The same number of questions was
asked from the participant, and it was asked in the same order.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria
1. Teacher of primary and elementary school
who handles learners with special
educational needs and parents who had a
special child.
1. Non-teaching staff and parents without
special child.
2. At least 5 years or more in service as a
teacher who handles learners with special
educational needs.
2. Teacher who were below 5 years in service.
3. Teacher-participant who attended
seminar and training related to the inclusive
education for learners with special
education.
3. Teachers-participant who did not attended
seminar and training related to the inclusive
education for learners with special
educational
needs.
Selection of the participants was based on the following inclusion, to wit:
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Participants of the Study
The participants of this study were the 16 school heads, 16 teachers, and 16 parents
of learners with special educational needs per school from medium schools in the District
of Sapian during the school year 2024-2025. Purposive sampling was used to select the
participants of the study.
The schools involved were the following:
1). Agsilab ES, 2). Agtatacay Norte ES, 3). Angkin ES, 4). Bangkal ES, 6). Benlit
ES, 7). Bilao IS, 8). Camansi PS, 9). Damayan ES, 10. Dapdapan ES 11). Guibongan PS,
12). Lonoy ES, 13.) Majanlud ES, 14). Maninang ES, 15). Sapian ES, 16). Wenceslao
Oñas ES.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Profile of the Participants
The Table 1 presents the participant’ profile in terms of training attended, length of
teaching learners with special educational needs, and inclusivity of learners with special
educational needs in regular class.
Personal Information Frequency Percentage (%)
Training Attended
Did not undergo Training 16 100.0
Total 16 100.0
Length of Teaching Learners with SEN
5-6 years 6 38.0
7-8 years 5 31.0
9-10 years 5 31.0
Total 16 100.0
Inclusivity of Learners with SEN in Regular
Classes
Yes 15 94.0
No 1 6.0
Total 16 100.0
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Data Gathering Procedures
1.Preparation of Request Letter:
1. Drafted a request letter addressed to the Schools Division
Superintendent, District Supervisor, and School Principals in the
District of Sapian.
2. Submitted the request letter to the Administrative Officer of the
District Office to obtain the master list of teachers for School Year
2024–2025.
2.Utilization of Data Display:
1. Used data displays to clarify themes and organize, summarize, and
interpret subjective information during analysis.
2. Ensured that data displays illuminated rather than obscured
meanings.
3.Preparation for In-Depth Interviews:
1. Developed an interview guide and questions for gathering qualitative
narrative data.
2. Prepared and sent permission letters to school principals to seek
consent from participants.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Data Gathering Procedures
4. Conduct of In-Depth Interviews:
1. Scheduled face-to-face interviews with selected participants based on
purposive sampling aligned with project goals.
2. Literature review informed the interview process, deepening the
understanding of inclusive education practices and challenges.
3. Participants were informed about the date, time, and mode of the
interview.
5.Role of Researcher During Interviews:
4. Acted as a moderator, allowing participants to answer questions
freely without scales.
5. Adjusted the flow and arrangement of questions dynamically based
on participant responses (Ingrid, 2016).
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Data Gathering Procedures
6. Confidentiality Measures:
1. Coded participants as Key Informant Interview Participant (KIIP) 01–
16 to ensure confidentiality.
2. Participants were not part of the sample size.
7. Documentation of Activity:
3. Recorded all interviews for accuracy and transparency.
4. Concluded interviews with expressions of gratitude to participants.
5. Captured photos for documentation purposes.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
General Objectives
This study aimed to determine the inclusive education practices and challenges for
learners with special educational needs in the District of Sapian for the school year
2024-2025.
Specifically, it sought answers to the following questions:
1. What are the exceptionalities of learners with special educational needs in the
District of Sapian?
2. What are the strategies applied by the teachers in handling learners with special
educational needs?
3. What are the challenges faced by teachers in implementing inclusive education for
learners with special educational needs?
4. How do teachers cope with the challenges encountered in implementing inclusive
education for learners with special educational needs?
5. What programs can be developed for sustainable support to inclusive education?
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Statement of the Problem #1
What are the exceptionalities of learners with special educational
needs in the District of Sapian?
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP #1 FINDINGS
Exceptionalities Diagnosed by
Licensed Medical Specialists
That data shows that out of 44 learners with SEN, 13 or 29.5% of them diagnosed
with learning disability, 9 or 20.5% were intellectual disability, 6 or 13.6 % were visual
impairment, 5 or 11.4% were autism special disorder and speech/language disorder
respectively, 2 or 4.5% were emotional behavioral disorder and special health
problem/chronic disease respectively, and 1 or 2.3% was orthopedic/physical handicap and
multiple diseases respectively.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP #1 FINDINGS
Exceptionalities Identified Through
Teacher Observation
Out of 140 learners with SEN identified through teacher observation, majority or
67.5% of them had difficulty inn remembering, concentrating, paying attention, and
understanding; 17 or 10.6% had difficulty in communicating; 11 or 6.9% had difficulty in
applying knowledge; 10 or 6.3% had difficulty in displaying inter-personal behavior; 9 or
5.6% had difficulty in seeing; 2 or 1.3% had difficulty in applying adaptive skills and
difficulty in mobility (walking, climbing, and grasping) respectively; and 1 or 0.6% has
difficulty in hearing.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP # 1 CONCLUSIONS
The implementation of Inclusive Education has significantly
strengthened the Department of Education’s efforts in identifying and
supporting learners with special educational needs. Through the
integration of exceptionality categories in the Learner Information
System (LIS), schools are now able to accurately tag and track learners
requiring additional support. This tracking mechanism, primarily
facilitated by class advisers, ensures that no learner is left behind and
that appropriate interventions are made available.
Based on the District’s consolidated data submitted by schools,
it is evident that the consistent and accurate tagging of learners plays a
vital role in improving educational planning and the delivery of inclusive
services. The data serves as a foundation for deploying necessary
resources, such as SPED teachers and learning support aides, and for
strengthening policies that promote equity and access.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP # 1 CONCLUSIONS
Technically, the efficient use of the LIS in monitoring learners
with exceptionalities reflects DepEd’s commitment to inclusive and
learner-centered education.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP #1 RECOMMENDATIONS
To ensure accurate tagging of learners with special educational
needs (LSENs) in the Learner Information System (LIS), regular training for
teachers on identifying exceptionalities based on DepEd guidelines is
essential. Schools should assign a focal person or SPED coordinator to
assist with tagging, ensuring consistency. A validation process at the
school and district levels is necessary to confirm data accuracy.
Collaboration with health professionals for clinical evaluations and a
simplified referral system can aid early identification of LSENs.
Additionally, using learner portfolios and evidence-based
documentation will support informed tagging decisions, improving data
reliability and intervention planning.
Moving forward, continuous capacity-building for teachers in
identifying and supporting these learners is recommended to further
enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of this system.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Statement of the Problem #2
What are the strategies applied by the teachers in handling learners with
special educational needs?
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP #2 FINDINGS
Strategies Applied by the Teachers in Handling
Learners with Special Educational Needs
Based on the thematic analysis of the responses gathered through In-Depth
Interview, the result revealed that the instructional strategies, motivation strategies,
social and emotional support, and practical skills development were the teaching
strategies and approaches utilized by the teachers in respective schools as one of the
strategies in handling learners with special educational needs in their class. Each theme
illuminated the core of the issue, revealing the genuine practices, the essential strategies,
and the profound impact that teachers have in supporting learners with special
educational needs. These findings crafted a clear and compelling narrative of what
succeeds, what falls short, and how the strategies applied by educators fundamentally
shape the learning and development of these students.
Table 4. Thematic Analysis of Teachers’ Strategies in Handling Learners with Special Educational Needs
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Themes Subthemes Participants Frequency
Instructional
Strategies
Differentiated instruction P1, P4, P6, P14 4
Scaffolding technique P 9 1
Grouping strategies P 3 1
Use of assistive technology P 2 1
Motivational
Strategies
Use of reward system P 5, 1
Game-based learning P 11 1
Participation in extracurricular activities P 15 1
Social and Emotional
Support
Protection from bullying and misconduct
P 7, P 12 2
Building trust through communication
P 8 1
Practical Skill
Development
Real-life skills training P 10 1
School/ classroom tasks P 13, P16 2
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP # 2 CONCLUSIONS
The strategies applied in handling learners with special
educational needs require a versatile approach that prioritizes
individualized support and inclusivity. By implementing these strategies,
such as individualized education plans, differentiated instruction,
assistive technology, and collaborative approaches,- teachers, school
heads, and parents can create an environment where learners have the
opportunity to succeed. The ultimate goal is to empower learners with
special educational needs to reach their full potential, ensuring that they
are valued and respected members of the educational community. As
society continues to embrace diversity and inclusion, these strategies
will play a pivotal role in shaping an equitable and supportive
educational landscape.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP #2 RECOMMENDATIONS
School heads may develop and implement policies that prioritize
inclusion as a fundamental aspect of their educational systems. These
policies may outline clear goals, provide guidelines for implementation,
and allocate resources to support inclusive practices for learners with
special educational needs.
Teachers may attend a comprehensive training program that equips
them with the skills and knowledge to address the needs of learners with
special educational needs. This includes training in differentiated
instruction, classroom management techniques, and the use of assistive
technologies. Ongoing professional development opportunities may be
made available to ensure that they remain informed about the latest
inclusive education practices.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP #2 RECOMMENDATIONS
Parents and the community must strengthen their involvement
for the success of inclusive education for learners with special educational
needs. Parents may actively engage with schools and communities to
foster a supportive network for learners with special educational needs.
This can be achieved through regular communication, workshops, and
collaborative initiatives that raise awareness and promote understanding
of inclusive education.
Finally, the school head, teachers, and parents should work hand
in hand to support learners with special educational needs. Strengthening
desirable practices as part of their individual roles and responsibilities can
lead to more purposeful and effective support for these vulnerable
learners.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Statement of the Problem #3
What are the challenges faced by the teachers in implementing inclusive education
for learners with special educational needs?
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP # 3 FINDINGS
Challenges Faced by the Teachers in Implementing
Inclusive Education for Learners with
Special Educational Needs
It indicates that teaching learners with special educational needs comes with its own
unique set of challenges, and for many teachers, this is one of the hardest parts of their job.
From the in-depth interviews, teachers shared that the most difficult aspects they face
include the lack of resources, classroom management and behavioral issues, lack of
parental involvement, and the emotional and mental strain.
Without enough materials or support, many teachers have no choice but to rely on
general strategies or make do with what they have, often feeling that it's not enough to truly
meet their students’ needs. It can be discouraging to see students struggle and not have the
proper tools to help them fully. Some teachers even expressed feelings of helplessness,
knowing they want to do more but are held back by limitations beyond their control.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP # 3 FINDINGS
Themes Subthemes Participants Frequency
Lack of Resources  Insufficient Funding & Materials P1, P11, P12, P15 4
 Limited Training & IEP
Implementation
P2, P7, P9, 16 4
 Limited Access to Specialized
Services
P3, P10 2
Classroom
Management &
Behavioral Issues
 Difficulty in Maintaining Order P4, P13 2
Lack of Parental
Involvement
 Weak Home-School Connection P5, P8 2
Emotional and Mental
Strain
 High Teacher Stress Levels P6, P14 2
Table 5. Thematic Analysis of the Challenges Faced by Teachers in Implementing Inclusive Education for
Learners with Special Educational Needs
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP # 3 CONCLUSIONS
Implementing inclusive education for learners with special
educational needs involves overcoming various challenges. Addressing
these challenges requires a comprehensive approach that includes
adequate funding, teacher training, curriculum flexibility, positive
attitudes, and accessible infrastructure. By tackling these issues,
educational institutions can create an environment where learners have
the opportunity to succeed and thrive. Inclusive education not only
benefits learners with special educational needs but also enriches the
educational experience for learners by promoting diversity, empathy,
and collaboration.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP #3 RECOMMENDATIONS
It is highly recommended that there should have individual
supports and resources to effectively support learners with special
educational needs. Schools may offer individualized education plans (IEPs)
that are tailored to each learner's unique needs. These plans may be
developed in collaboration with teachers, parents, and specialists,
ensuring a holistic approach to the learner's development. Additionally,
schools may provide access to resources such as specialized equipment,
learning aids, and support staff to facilitate an inclusive learning
environment.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Statement of the Problem #4
How do teachers cope with the challenges they encounter in implementing inclusive
education for learners with special educational needs?
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
How teachers cope with the Challenges they encountered
in Implementing Inclusive Education for Learners
with Special Educational Needs
The study formulated four (4) themes representing the key mechanisms in
managing the challenges that teachers encountered in implementing inclusive education,
such as stress management strategies, personal and professional strategies, physical and
mental relaxation, and the support system. It implies that the challenges of implementing
inclusive education for learners with special needs are significant, but they are not
insurmountable. By investing in professional development, leveraging available resources,
fostering collaboration, and cultivating an inclusive classroom culture, educators can create
an environment where all learners have the opportunity to succeed. The journey towards
inclusive education requires dedication, creativity, and a commitment to continuous
improvement, but the reward of seeing all learners succeed is well worth the effort.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP # 4 FINDINGS
Themes Subthemes Participants Frequency
Stress Management Strategies  Classroom Organization P1, P3, 2
 School-home boundaries P9, P12, P16 3
Personal and Professional Strategies  Structural Routine P5 1
 Learners’ Learning
Independence
P7 1
Physical and Mental Relaxation  Conducive Atmosphere P2, P4, P8, P10 4
 Embrace Technology P6, P13, P14, P15 4
Support System  Workplace Support P11 1
Table 6. Thematic Analysis of how teachers cope with the Challenges they encountered in
Implementing Inclusive Education for Learners with Special Educational Needs
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP # 4 CONCLUSIONS
By coping up the challenges in implementing inclusive education for
learners with special educational needs is a multifaceted challenge that
requires dedication, collaboration, and innovation. By addressing
resource constraints, enhancing teacher training, fostering positive
attitudes can create environments that support learners. The journey
towards inclusivity is ongoing, but with commitment and perseverance,
it is possible to build educational systems that truly embrace diversity
and provide equitable opportunities for every learner with special needs.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
SOP #4 RECOMMENDATIONS
To overcome the challenges of implementing inclusive education
for learners with special needs, schools must focus on securing necessary
resources, improving teacher training, and promoting positive attitudes
toward inclusion. Addressing these areas head-on with commitment and
collaboration will help create supportive environments where all learners
can succeed. Persistence and teamwork are key to making inclusive
education a reality.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Statement of the Problem #5
What programs can be developed for sustainable support to inclusive education?
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Proposed Program Development Programs for Sustainable
Support to Inclusive Education
I. Rationale
Inclusive education is a transformative approach that seeks to provide all learners,
regardless of their diverse backgrounds and abilities, with equitable access to quality
education. To achieve this, development programs play a crucial role in fostering sustainable
support systems that can address the diverse needs of students. This proposed program
explores the key components and strategies of development programs designed to support
inclusive education sustainably.
The proposed development programs for sustainable support to inclusive education are
essential in creating equitable learning environments that cater to the diverse needs of
learners. By focusing on planning and assistance, these programs can foster a culture of
inclusivity in education. Through strategic planning and assistance, inclusive education can
become a reality for all learners, paving the way for a more equitable and just society.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
II. Objectives
The proposed development program for sustainable support to inclusive
education
aims to:
1. Minimize the challenges encountered not only by teachers but also by school heads and
parents in teaching learners with special educational needs.
2. Train teachers in line with the proper handling of learners with special educational
needs.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Activities/
Projects
Strategies
Performance
Indicator
Time
Frame
Persons
Responsible
Step I Planning Conduct a general assembly
meeting with the school
heads, teachers. and
parents
Topic: To conduct two (2)
two-week training
workshops regarding
Inclusive education
strategies and challenges
for learners with special
educational needs
Attendance sheets
and documentation.
First week of May School head,
teaching, and non-
teaching personnel
III. Methodology
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
III. Methodology
Step II Assist Conduct a training workshop
among school heads,
teachers, and parents
Topic: To minimize the
challenges encountered by
school heads, teachers, and
parents in handling learners
with special educational
needs
Topic: Coping Mechanisms on
the challenges for the
inclusive education of
learners with special
educational needs
Training attendance,
training output, and
documentation
Second week of
May
School head,
teaching and non-
teaching personnel,
and parents
Activities/
Projects
Strategies
Performance
Indicator
Time
Frame
Persons
Responsible
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
IV. Budget
The total cost for the Training-Workshop needed was Php 100,000 from the other
resources of funds, subject to the usual accounting and auditing rules of the Department of
Education. The total amount is for the training workshop materials, food, accommodations,
and documentation.
V. Monitoring and Evaluation
A committee shall be assigned to monitor and evaluate the different activities for the
professional development of teachers.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
"Equity is not giving everyone a
shoe; equity is giving everyone a
shoe that fits"
COLLEGE OF EDUCATON
GRADUATE PROGRAM
Thank You So Much !!!

RESEARCH FINAL ORAL DEFENSE AS A REQUIREMET.pptx

  • 1.
    “EXPLORING INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONSTRATEGIES AND CHALLENGES FOR LEARNERS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS: INPUT TO SUSTAINABLE SUPPORT PROGRAMS” Advisory Committee: Adviser: ELMER M. ALBALADEJO, EdD Members: MA. LIDA A. SOLANO, PhD MARIA SHEILA D. SIMON, EdD Examining Committee: MARYBELLE F. AMENAMEN, EdD MARY ANN D. CERVAS, EdD NEDY S. COLDOVERO, PhD HAZEL D. JOAQUIN, PhD COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATE PROGRAM Researcher JOHNEL A. PANTIA FINAL ORAL DEFENSE PRESENTATION
  • 2.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Methodological Perspectives As one of the various approaches in qualitative narrative research methodology, interpretive description design focuses on the formation of a description. It moves this description beyond the clear evidence to probe for further relationships and patterns within an experience (Thorne, 2008). Interpretive description, which was developed by Thorne, Reimer Kirkham, and MacDonald- Emes, helps address complex research questions seen as important to health disciplines that are not fully addressed by other conventional qualitative methodologies. Moreover, every individual perceives, interprets and experiences a situation or phenomenon of interest from one point of view, since individual has different experiences of reality (Polit & Beck, 2008 as cited by Crispolon, 2023).
  • 3.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Context of the Study This qualitative study was based on the in-depth interviews from public elementary school heads, teachers and parents in the District of Sapian for this school year 2024-2025. An interview is a qualitative research technique that involves question-based data collection. Interviews enable the interviewers to interact and engage with the participants while also providing accurate and reliable results. An unstructured interview was used in this study to let the participants feel at ease. Questions were mostly open-ended and not arranged in order. Participants have more freedom to express themselves and elaborate on their answers. In order for the interviewer to review and evaluate the responses, tools such as paper, pen, and audio and video recorder were used.
  • 4.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Context of the Study Another research tool that was used in this study is observation because it is easy to execute and yields highly reliable data. It involved the researcher observing people interacting in either a controlled or uncontrolled environment. In this instance, uncontrolled or naturalistic observation was employed to preserve and investigate the participants’ spontaneous behavior in a natural setting. The researcher only wrote down what they observed and how they interpreted it. Moreover, to obtain the participants’ perception of the phenomena, an in-depth interview with semi-structured open-ended questions were prepared. This strategy was a subjective investigative method that includes conducting serious personal interviews with a small number of respondents to investigate their viewpoints on a specific thought, program, or circumstance (Boyce and Neale 2006 as cited by Crispolon, 2023). Further, this technique draws out detailed information, issues, and context arising from the perceptions of the participants giving out a comprehensive presentation of the whole experience.
  • 5.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Context of the Study Further, this technique draws out detailed information, issues, and context arising from the perceptions of the participants giving out a comprehensive presentation of the whole experience. Furthermore, to reinforce and substantiate the qualitative data, an in-depth interview will be undertaken. The researcher purposively selected the interview participants, who are public elementary school teachers and parents of the target participants of the study, to represent a broad and deep scope of insights into the inclusive education for learners with disabilities of public elementary school teachers in their practices and challenges. Thus, an in-depth interview was utilized as a subjective technique since it is most fitting for circumstances in which the investigator needs to ask open-ended questions that inspire the significance of information from by and large few people (Guion, et al, 2011 as cited by Peniano, 2023).
  • 6.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Context of the Study Twelve unrestricted questions were asked to explore and expound participants’ thoughts and perspectives about inclusive education for learners with special educational needs and its effect on their practices and challenges. Probes were used to follow up on the answers of the participants. For the researcher to gather data, researcher-made questions have been formulated based on the statement of the problem. These questions were asked to the participants in three semi-structured interviews. The same number of questions was asked from the participant, and it was asked in the same order.
  • 7.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria 1. Teacher of primary and elementary school who handles learners with special educational needs and parents who had a special child. 1. Non-teaching staff and parents without special child. 2. At least 5 years or more in service as a teacher who handles learners with special educational needs. 2. Teacher who were below 5 years in service. 3. Teacher-participant who attended seminar and training related to the inclusive education for learners with special education. 3. Teachers-participant who did not attended seminar and training related to the inclusive education for learners with special educational needs. Selection of the participants was based on the following inclusion, to wit:
  • 8.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Participants of the Study The participants of this study were the 16 school heads, 16 teachers, and 16 parents of learners with special educational needs per school from medium schools in the District of Sapian during the school year 2024-2025. Purposive sampling was used to select the participants of the study. The schools involved were the following: 1). Agsilab ES, 2). Agtatacay Norte ES, 3). Angkin ES, 4). Bangkal ES, 6). Benlit ES, 7). Bilao IS, 8). Camansi PS, 9). Damayan ES, 10. Dapdapan ES 11). Guibongan PS, 12). Lonoy ES, 13.) Majanlud ES, 14). Maninang ES, 15). Sapian ES, 16). Wenceslao Oñas ES.
  • 9.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Profile of the Participants The Table 1 presents the participant’ profile in terms of training attended, length of teaching learners with special educational needs, and inclusivity of learners with special educational needs in regular class. Personal Information Frequency Percentage (%) Training Attended Did not undergo Training 16 100.0 Total 16 100.0 Length of Teaching Learners with SEN 5-6 years 6 38.0 7-8 years 5 31.0 9-10 years 5 31.0 Total 16 100.0 Inclusivity of Learners with SEN in Regular Classes Yes 15 94.0 No 1 6.0 Total 16 100.0
  • 10.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Data Gathering Procedures 1.Preparation of Request Letter: 1. Drafted a request letter addressed to the Schools Division Superintendent, District Supervisor, and School Principals in the District of Sapian. 2. Submitted the request letter to the Administrative Officer of the District Office to obtain the master list of teachers for School Year 2024–2025. 2.Utilization of Data Display: 1. Used data displays to clarify themes and organize, summarize, and interpret subjective information during analysis. 2. Ensured that data displays illuminated rather than obscured meanings. 3.Preparation for In-Depth Interviews: 1. Developed an interview guide and questions for gathering qualitative narrative data. 2. Prepared and sent permission letters to school principals to seek consent from participants.
  • 11.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Data Gathering Procedures 4. Conduct of In-Depth Interviews: 1. Scheduled face-to-face interviews with selected participants based on purposive sampling aligned with project goals. 2. Literature review informed the interview process, deepening the understanding of inclusive education practices and challenges. 3. Participants were informed about the date, time, and mode of the interview. 5.Role of Researcher During Interviews: 4. Acted as a moderator, allowing participants to answer questions freely without scales. 5. Adjusted the flow and arrangement of questions dynamically based on participant responses (Ingrid, 2016).
  • 12.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Data Gathering Procedures 6. Confidentiality Measures: 1. Coded participants as Key Informant Interview Participant (KIIP) 01– 16 to ensure confidentiality. 2. Participants were not part of the sample size. 7. Documentation of Activity: 3. Recorded all interviews for accuracy and transparency. 4. Concluded interviews with expressions of gratitude to participants. 5. Captured photos for documentation purposes.
  • 13.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM General Objectives This study aimed to determine the inclusive education practices and challenges for learners with special educational needs in the District of Sapian for the school year 2024-2025. Specifically, it sought answers to the following questions: 1. What are the exceptionalities of learners with special educational needs in the District of Sapian? 2. What are the strategies applied by the teachers in handling learners with special educational needs? 3. What are the challenges faced by teachers in implementing inclusive education for learners with special educational needs? 4. How do teachers cope with the challenges encountered in implementing inclusive education for learners with special educational needs? 5. What programs can be developed for sustainable support to inclusive education?
  • 14.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Statement of the Problem #1 What are the exceptionalities of learners with special educational needs in the District of Sapian?
  • 15.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP #1 FINDINGS Exceptionalities Diagnosed by Licensed Medical Specialists That data shows that out of 44 learners with SEN, 13 or 29.5% of them diagnosed with learning disability, 9 or 20.5% were intellectual disability, 6 or 13.6 % were visual impairment, 5 or 11.4% were autism special disorder and speech/language disorder respectively, 2 or 4.5% were emotional behavioral disorder and special health problem/chronic disease respectively, and 1 or 2.3% was orthopedic/physical handicap and multiple diseases respectively.
  • 16.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP #1 FINDINGS Exceptionalities Identified Through Teacher Observation Out of 140 learners with SEN identified through teacher observation, majority or 67.5% of them had difficulty inn remembering, concentrating, paying attention, and understanding; 17 or 10.6% had difficulty in communicating; 11 or 6.9% had difficulty in applying knowledge; 10 or 6.3% had difficulty in displaying inter-personal behavior; 9 or 5.6% had difficulty in seeing; 2 or 1.3% had difficulty in applying adaptive skills and difficulty in mobility (walking, climbing, and grasping) respectively; and 1 or 0.6% has difficulty in hearing.
  • 17.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP # 1 CONCLUSIONS The implementation of Inclusive Education has significantly strengthened the Department of Education’s efforts in identifying and supporting learners with special educational needs. Through the integration of exceptionality categories in the Learner Information System (LIS), schools are now able to accurately tag and track learners requiring additional support. This tracking mechanism, primarily facilitated by class advisers, ensures that no learner is left behind and that appropriate interventions are made available. Based on the District’s consolidated data submitted by schools, it is evident that the consistent and accurate tagging of learners plays a vital role in improving educational planning and the delivery of inclusive services. The data serves as a foundation for deploying necessary resources, such as SPED teachers and learning support aides, and for strengthening policies that promote equity and access.
  • 18.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP # 1 CONCLUSIONS Technically, the efficient use of the LIS in monitoring learners with exceptionalities reflects DepEd’s commitment to inclusive and learner-centered education.
  • 19.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP #1 RECOMMENDATIONS To ensure accurate tagging of learners with special educational needs (LSENs) in the Learner Information System (LIS), regular training for teachers on identifying exceptionalities based on DepEd guidelines is essential. Schools should assign a focal person or SPED coordinator to assist with tagging, ensuring consistency. A validation process at the school and district levels is necessary to confirm data accuracy. Collaboration with health professionals for clinical evaluations and a simplified referral system can aid early identification of LSENs. Additionally, using learner portfolios and evidence-based documentation will support informed tagging decisions, improving data reliability and intervention planning. Moving forward, continuous capacity-building for teachers in identifying and supporting these learners is recommended to further enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of this system.
  • 20.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Statement of the Problem #2 What are the strategies applied by the teachers in handling learners with special educational needs?
  • 21.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP #2 FINDINGS Strategies Applied by the Teachers in Handling Learners with Special Educational Needs Based on the thematic analysis of the responses gathered through In-Depth Interview, the result revealed that the instructional strategies, motivation strategies, social and emotional support, and practical skills development were the teaching strategies and approaches utilized by the teachers in respective schools as one of the strategies in handling learners with special educational needs in their class. Each theme illuminated the core of the issue, revealing the genuine practices, the essential strategies, and the profound impact that teachers have in supporting learners with special educational needs. These findings crafted a clear and compelling narrative of what succeeds, what falls short, and how the strategies applied by educators fundamentally shape the learning and development of these students.
  • 22.
    Table 4. ThematicAnalysis of Teachers’ Strategies in Handling Learners with Special Educational Needs COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATE PROGRAM Themes Subthemes Participants Frequency Instructional Strategies Differentiated instruction P1, P4, P6, P14 4 Scaffolding technique P 9 1 Grouping strategies P 3 1 Use of assistive technology P 2 1 Motivational Strategies Use of reward system P 5, 1 Game-based learning P 11 1 Participation in extracurricular activities P 15 1 Social and Emotional Support Protection from bullying and misconduct P 7, P 12 2 Building trust through communication P 8 1 Practical Skill Development Real-life skills training P 10 1 School/ classroom tasks P 13, P16 2
  • 23.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP # 2 CONCLUSIONS The strategies applied in handling learners with special educational needs require a versatile approach that prioritizes individualized support and inclusivity. By implementing these strategies, such as individualized education plans, differentiated instruction, assistive technology, and collaborative approaches,- teachers, school heads, and parents can create an environment where learners have the opportunity to succeed. The ultimate goal is to empower learners with special educational needs to reach their full potential, ensuring that they are valued and respected members of the educational community. As society continues to embrace diversity and inclusion, these strategies will play a pivotal role in shaping an equitable and supportive educational landscape.
  • 24.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP #2 RECOMMENDATIONS School heads may develop and implement policies that prioritize inclusion as a fundamental aspect of their educational systems. These policies may outline clear goals, provide guidelines for implementation, and allocate resources to support inclusive practices for learners with special educational needs. Teachers may attend a comprehensive training program that equips them with the skills and knowledge to address the needs of learners with special educational needs. This includes training in differentiated instruction, classroom management techniques, and the use of assistive technologies. Ongoing professional development opportunities may be made available to ensure that they remain informed about the latest inclusive education practices.
  • 25.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP #2 RECOMMENDATIONS Parents and the community must strengthen their involvement for the success of inclusive education for learners with special educational needs. Parents may actively engage with schools and communities to foster a supportive network for learners with special educational needs. This can be achieved through regular communication, workshops, and collaborative initiatives that raise awareness and promote understanding of inclusive education. Finally, the school head, teachers, and parents should work hand in hand to support learners with special educational needs. Strengthening desirable practices as part of their individual roles and responsibilities can lead to more purposeful and effective support for these vulnerable learners.
  • 26.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Statement of the Problem #3 What are the challenges faced by the teachers in implementing inclusive education for learners with special educational needs?
  • 27.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP # 3 FINDINGS Challenges Faced by the Teachers in Implementing Inclusive Education for Learners with Special Educational Needs It indicates that teaching learners with special educational needs comes with its own unique set of challenges, and for many teachers, this is one of the hardest parts of their job. From the in-depth interviews, teachers shared that the most difficult aspects they face include the lack of resources, classroom management and behavioral issues, lack of parental involvement, and the emotional and mental strain. Without enough materials or support, many teachers have no choice but to rely on general strategies or make do with what they have, often feeling that it's not enough to truly meet their students’ needs. It can be discouraging to see students struggle and not have the proper tools to help them fully. Some teachers even expressed feelings of helplessness, knowing they want to do more but are held back by limitations beyond their control.
  • 28.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP # 3 FINDINGS Themes Subthemes Participants Frequency Lack of Resources  Insufficient Funding & Materials P1, P11, P12, P15 4  Limited Training & IEP Implementation P2, P7, P9, 16 4  Limited Access to Specialized Services P3, P10 2 Classroom Management & Behavioral Issues  Difficulty in Maintaining Order P4, P13 2 Lack of Parental Involvement  Weak Home-School Connection P5, P8 2 Emotional and Mental Strain  High Teacher Stress Levels P6, P14 2 Table 5. Thematic Analysis of the Challenges Faced by Teachers in Implementing Inclusive Education for Learners with Special Educational Needs
  • 29.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP # 3 CONCLUSIONS Implementing inclusive education for learners with special educational needs involves overcoming various challenges. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive approach that includes adequate funding, teacher training, curriculum flexibility, positive attitudes, and accessible infrastructure. By tackling these issues, educational institutions can create an environment where learners have the opportunity to succeed and thrive. Inclusive education not only benefits learners with special educational needs but also enriches the educational experience for learners by promoting diversity, empathy, and collaboration.
  • 30.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP #3 RECOMMENDATIONS It is highly recommended that there should have individual supports and resources to effectively support learners with special educational needs. Schools may offer individualized education plans (IEPs) that are tailored to each learner's unique needs. These plans may be developed in collaboration with teachers, parents, and specialists, ensuring a holistic approach to the learner's development. Additionally, schools may provide access to resources such as specialized equipment, learning aids, and support staff to facilitate an inclusive learning environment.
  • 31.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Statement of the Problem #4 How do teachers cope with the challenges they encounter in implementing inclusive education for learners with special educational needs?
  • 32.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM How teachers cope with the Challenges they encountered in Implementing Inclusive Education for Learners with Special Educational Needs The study formulated four (4) themes representing the key mechanisms in managing the challenges that teachers encountered in implementing inclusive education, such as stress management strategies, personal and professional strategies, physical and mental relaxation, and the support system. It implies that the challenges of implementing inclusive education for learners with special needs are significant, but they are not insurmountable. By investing in professional development, leveraging available resources, fostering collaboration, and cultivating an inclusive classroom culture, educators can create an environment where all learners have the opportunity to succeed. The journey towards inclusive education requires dedication, creativity, and a commitment to continuous improvement, but the reward of seeing all learners succeed is well worth the effort.
  • 33.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP # 4 FINDINGS Themes Subthemes Participants Frequency Stress Management Strategies  Classroom Organization P1, P3, 2  School-home boundaries P9, P12, P16 3 Personal and Professional Strategies  Structural Routine P5 1  Learners’ Learning Independence P7 1 Physical and Mental Relaxation  Conducive Atmosphere P2, P4, P8, P10 4  Embrace Technology P6, P13, P14, P15 4 Support System  Workplace Support P11 1 Table 6. Thematic Analysis of how teachers cope with the Challenges they encountered in Implementing Inclusive Education for Learners with Special Educational Needs
  • 34.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP # 4 CONCLUSIONS By coping up the challenges in implementing inclusive education for learners with special educational needs is a multifaceted challenge that requires dedication, collaboration, and innovation. By addressing resource constraints, enhancing teacher training, fostering positive attitudes can create environments that support learners. The journey towards inclusivity is ongoing, but with commitment and perseverance, it is possible to build educational systems that truly embrace diversity and provide equitable opportunities for every learner with special needs.
  • 35.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM SOP #4 RECOMMENDATIONS To overcome the challenges of implementing inclusive education for learners with special needs, schools must focus on securing necessary resources, improving teacher training, and promoting positive attitudes toward inclusion. Addressing these areas head-on with commitment and collaboration will help create supportive environments where all learners can succeed. Persistence and teamwork are key to making inclusive education a reality.
  • 36.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Statement of the Problem #5 What programs can be developed for sustainable support to inclusive education?
  • 37.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Proposed Program Development Programs for Sustainable Support to Inclusive Education I. Rationale Inclusive education is a transformative approach that seeks to provide all learners, regardless of their diverse backgrounds and abilities, with equitable access to quality education. To achieve this, development programs play a crucial role in fostering sustainable support systems that can address the diverse needs of students. This proposed program explores the key components and strategies of development programs designed to support inclusive education sustainably. The proposed development programs for sustainable support to inclusive education are essential in creating equitable learning environments that cater to the diverse needs of learners. By focusing on planning and assistance, these programs can foster a culture of inclusivity in education. Through strategic planning and assistance, inclusive education can become a reality for all learners, paving the way for a more equitable and just society.
  • 38.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM II. Objectives The proposed development program for sustainable support to inclusive education aims to: 1. Minimize the challenges encountered not only by teachers but also by school heads and parents in teaching learners with special educational needs. 2. Train teachers in line with the proper handling of learners with special educational needs.
  • 39.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Activities/ Projects Strategies Performance Indicator Time Frame Persons Responsible Step I Planning Conduct a general assembly meeting with the school heads, teachers. and parents Topic: To conduct two (2) two-week training workshops regarding Inclusive education strategies and challenges for learners with special educational needs Attendance sheets and documentation. First week of May School head, teaching, and non- teaching personnel III. Methodology
  • 40.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM III. Methodology Step II Assist Conduct a training workshop among school heads, teachers, and parents Topic: To minimize the challenges encountered by school heads, teachers, and parents in handling learners with special educational needs Topic: Coping Mechanisms on the challenges for the inclusive education of learners with special educational needs Training attendance, training output, and documentation Second week of May School head, teaching and non- teaching personnel, and parents Activities/ Projects Strategies Performance Indicator Time Frame Persons Responsible
  • 41.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM IV. Budget The total cost for the Training-Workshop needed was Php 100,000 from the other resources of funds, subject to the usual accounting and auditing rules of the Department of Education. The total amount is for the training workshop materials, food, accommodations, and documentation. V. Monitoring and Evaluation A committee shall be assigned to monitor and evaluate the different activities for the professional development of teachers.
  • 42.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM "Equity is not giving everyone a shoe; equity is giving everyone a shoe that fits"
  • 43.
    COLLEGE OF EDUCATON GRADUATEPROGRAM Thank You So Much !!!

Editor's Notes

  • #15 Summary of Findings Classification of Exceptionalities     A. Diagnosed by licensed medical specialists     B. Identified through teacher observation     A. Total of 204 Learners with Special Educational Needs (LSENs) identified in the District of Sapian     B. Most common exceptionality:         1. Difficulty in remembering, concentrating, paying attention, and understanding (108 learners or 52.94%)     C. Other notable exceptionalities:         1. Difficulty in communicating (8.33%)         2. Learning disabilities, applying knowledge, and interpersonal behavior issues     D. L ess common: visual impairment, autism spectrum disorder, orthopedic handicap, etc.     
  • #16 Summary of Findings Classification of Exceptionalities     A. Diagnosed by licensed medical specialists     B. Identified through teacher observation     A. Total of 204 Learners with Special Educational Needs (LSENs) identified in the District of Sapian     B. Most common exceptionality:         1. Difficulty in remembering, concentrating, paying attention, and understanding (108 learners or 52.94%)     C. Other notable exceptionalities:         1. Difficulty in communicating (8.33%)         2. Learning disabilities, applying knowledge, and interpersonal behavior issues     D. L ess common: visual impairment, autism spectrum disorder, orthopedic handicap, etc.     
  • #22 Table 4 shows how teachers monitor and evaluate the progress of learners with special educational needs. Based on their interview, assessments and observation, collaboration with stakeholders and motivational strategies were their primary way of tracking the progress of these learners. Assessments and observations are done through informal/formal assessments and daily observations, and classroom participation of learners. The second is the Collaboration of stakeholders. Partnership with teachers, parents, specialists, and school administrators plays a vital role in understanding and addressing the unique learning needs of these students. Through Proper communication with these stakeholders, for instance, Teachers need to maintain open and transparent communication with parents, guardians, specialists, and other stakeholders to ensure that the support provided in school aligns with what learners experience at home. This means regularly updating parents on their child’s progress, discussing concerns, and working together to find solutions that benefit the learner. Weekly progress reports, scheduled meetings, and even informal conversations help build a strong partnership between the school and the home. Proper communication also ensures that interventions and accommodations are effectively implemented. When teachers and specialists exchange information, they can adjust teaching methods, recommend assistive technologies, or tailor lesson plans to fit the needs of learners with special educational needs. The 3rd is motivational strategies, such as appreciation and rewards. It represents a unified motivational strategy that blends intrinsic validation (recognizing effort through praise, feedback, or gestures) with extrinsic reinforcement (tangible incentives like tokens or privileges) to acknowledge progress, sustain engagement, and cultivate self-efficacy in learners with special educational needs.
  • #27 Table 8 presents the factors that adds burden in teaching learners with special educational needs. These are Lack of resources with sub-themes insufficient funding and materials, limited training & IEP implementation, Classroom management & behavioral Issues with sub-theme difficulty in maintaining order, Lack of parental involvement with sub-theme weak home-school connection, and the Emotional and mental strain with sub-theme High teacher stress levels.
  • #28 Table 9 presents the challenges in teaching learners with different special needs, which include classroom management issues, lack of resources and support, and social integration issues. These draining factors place a significant burden on teachers with learners of diverse exceptionalities, as they must adapt their teaching strategies, provide individualized support, and manage varying learning needs, all of which contribute to increased stress and workload .
  • #33 Table 10 presents the thematic analysis of how teachers cope with challenges that they encounter in implementing inclusive education for learners with special needs. The study formulated four (4) themes representing the key mechanisms in managing the challenges that teachers encountered in implementing inclusive education, such as stress management strategies, personal and professional strategies, physical and mental relaxation, and the support system. .
  • #37 Three (3) key themes on specific programs supporting learners with special educational needs emerged from the participants' responses. These programs focus on instructional support, academic and health assistance, and stakeholder engagement.
  • #38 Three (3) key themes on specific programs supporting learners with special educational needs emerged from the participants' responses. These programs focus on instructional support, academic and health assistance, and stakeholder engagement.
  • #39 Three (3) key themes on specific programs supporting learners with special educational needs emerged from the participants' responses. These programs focus on instructional support, academic and health assistance, and stakeholder engagement.
  • #40 Three (3) key themes on specific programs supporting learners with special educational needs emerged from the participants' responses. These programs focus on instructional support, academic and health assistance, and stakeholder engagement.
  • #42 Learners with special educational needs often require accommodations and modifications to access the curriculum and participate fully in school life. Providing the "same shoe" (i.e., the same educational approach) to these students would not address their unique needs and could hinder their progress