ترکیب اطلاعات:
عدم تجانس، دیدگاه ها، تسلط طرح، ادغام منابع متعدد اطلاعات
استاد راهنما : دکتر محسن زین العابدینی
آموزشیار: خانم دکتر فاطمه پازوکی
دانشجو: فاطمه ذات عجم
کارشناس ارشد مدیریت اطلاعات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
بهار 1396
Isc scientometrics system for evaluating researchSomayeh GhaviDel
This document summarizes a study that uses co-word analysis to analyze the conceptual network evolution of cybernetics research in Middle Eastern countries. The study analyzes 2,280 keywords from 705 scholarly records related to cybernetics published in Middle Eastern countries until 2018. The keywords were clustered and mapped to identify 12 conceptual clusters within the field. The largest cluster focused on data mining algorithms. The results show the core issues and most developed areas of research, and can help inform research planning and policymaking regarding cybernetics in the Middle East.
ترکیب اطلاعات:
عدم تجانس، دیدگاه ها، تسلط طرح، ادغام منابع متعدد اطلاعات
استاد راهنما : دکتر محسن زین العابدینی
آموزشیار: خانم دکتر فاطمه پازوکی
دانشجو: فاطمه ذات عجم
کارشناس ارشد مدیریت اطلاعات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
بهار 1396
Isc scientometrics system for evaluating researchSomayeh GhaviDel
This document summarizes a study that uses co-word analysis to analyze the conceptual network evolution of cybernetics research in Middle Eastern countries. The study analyzes 2,280 keywords from 705 scholarly records related to cybernetics published in Middle Eastern countries until 2018. The keywords were clustered and mapped to identify 12 conceptual clusters within the field. The largest cluster focused on data mining algorithms. The results show the core issues and most developed areas of research, and can help inform research planning and policymaking regarding cybernetics in the Middle East.
This document summarizes a research article from the Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management. The article examines the relationships between ontologies and social tagging as new ways of organizing and sharing knowledge online. It explores how ontologies and social tagging can help promote one another, despite their differences. The research was conducted using a library-based conceptual approach, studying both print and electronic resources. It finds that tags can be used in the semantic web and ontologies in web 2.0 to address weaknesses in organizing and retrieving information. The use of tags in ontologies and ontologies in web 2.0 can make them more functional and accepted by users.
This document summarizes a research article from the Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management. The article examines the relationships between ontologies and social tagging as new ways of organizing and sharing knowledge online. It explores how ontologies and social tagging can help promote one another, despite their differences. The research was conducted using a library-based conceptual approach, studying both print and electronic resources. It finds that tags can be used in the semantic web and ontologies in web 2.0 to address weaknesses in organizing and retrieving information. The use of tags in ontologies and ontologies in web 2.0 can make them more functional and accepted by users.
54. ماخذ و منابع
11.،نيایرياح،نصرت،رحيمی،فروغ،لطيفی،معصومه،بخشيانهللاليلی(1394).بررسیميزانانطباق
ربطسيستمیوربطکاربرمدارانهدراه سايهایاطالعاتیSID-ISC-Google Scholar.تعاملانسان
واطالعات،جلد2،شماره1.ص.1-11.
12.،ساراسويکتفکو(1389).ربطدرعلم،رسانیعاطال،ترجمهحيدر،مختاریعباسميرزايی.تهران:
چاسار.
13.،فتاحیهللاترحم(1383).تحليلعواملمؤثربرنسبیبودنربطدرهايمنظابازيابیاطالعات.
شناسیعاطال،2(1)،ص.14-18.
14.،ويکریبرايان؛،ويکریالينا(1380).علمرسانیعاطالدرنظروعمل.ترجمهعبدالحسينسهلوجفر.
مشهد:اه دانشفردوسی،مشهدص379-444.
15. Barry, C.L. (1994).User defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45 (3), 149-159.
16. Harter, stephen, p. (1992). Psychological Relevance and Information
Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43, 9,
602-615.
17. Lancaster, F.W. (1997). Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics,
Testing and Evaluation. (2nd ed.) New York: John wiley and sons, 1979
Quoted in Stefano Mizaro. "Relevance: the Whole History". Journal of the
American Society for Information Science. Vol. 48, No. 9, 810-832.
18. Mizzaro, S. (1997). Relevance: the whole history. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 48 (12), 810-832.
19. Mizzaro, S. (1998). How many relevances in information retrieval?,
ScienceDirect, 10 (3): 303-320.
54
55. ماخذ و منابع
20. Park, T. (1996). The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval: An
Empirical Study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University.
Quoted in Harter, stephen. P. "Variations in Relevance Assessments and the
Measuremetn of Retrieval Effectiveness". Journal of the American Society
for Information Science. 47, 1, 37-49.
21. Sarasevic, T. (1999), Information Science. Journal of the American Society
for Information Science, 50 (12), 1051-1063.
22. Sarasevic, T. (1999), Information jungle on the Web: finding and
evaluating information sources, Presentation, available at:
http://www.ffzg.hr/infoz/lida/lida2000/information_jungle_on_the_web.ppt
.
23. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the
thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science. 26 (6), 321-343.
24. Saracevic, T. (1976). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the
thinking on the notion in information science. In, Advances in
Librarianship (M. J. Voigt and M. H. Harris, eds.), Vol.6, 81-138.
25. Saracevic, T. (1996). Relevance reconsidered. In: Information science:
Integration in perspectives. Proceedings of the Second Conference on
Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS 2). Copenhagen
(Denmark), 210-218. 55
56. ماخذ و منابع
26. Shamber. L. (1994). Relevance and Information Behavior. Annual Review
of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 29, 3-48, Available at:
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ491620.
27. Shamber. L., Eisenberg, M, Nilan, M.S. (1990). re-examination of
relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing
and Management: an International Journal, 26 (6), 755 – 776.
28. Swanson, D. R. (1998). Hisrorical Notes: Information Retrieval and the he
Future of an Illusion. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science, 39 (2), 92-98.
56