Regression Testing with Symfony
Tools and techniques for building your test suite
Introducing the speaker




              Joachim Unger
              @joeywannabe


              Symfony Explorer since 2.0
              Web Developer since 2010
              Former scientist at ABB Robotics


              Software Developer @LittleBird GmbH
              Berlin
Part 1: Exploring the techiques

   Regression Testing
   Test granularities in web projects
   Basic design patterns
   Symfony test components
   Behaviour Driven Development
   Continuous Integration
   Lessons learned
Regression Tests

   Discover new software bugs (regression)
   Verify bugfixes on existing functionality
   Validate changes against other components
   Include rerunning previously run tests
   Run on each code change
   Ensure product quality
   Minimize risks
Types of Regression Tests

 Progressive Regression Tests
    Specification has changed
    Code has been changed
      > Add new test cases
 Correcting Regression Tests
    Specification has not changed
    Test code changes against existing test cases
Regression Tests in web projects

 Defined test strategy
 Test-Driven Programming
   Tests for all code changes (e.g. bugfixes)
   Tests have to be up-to-date
   Continuous Refactoring
 Automated Test Suite
   Run on each code change
   Smoke, Acceptance and Unit Tests
   Continuous Integration
Software Quality


                         Functional Quality
                            Error-free execution of application
                            Strongly influences user acceptance
  Browser

                         Structural Quality
 Controller   View          Design and structure of code
              Utility       Loose coupling of components
                            Ensures extensibility of code
  Model
 ORM/DBAL
Unit Tests



    Assert that the result of
    foobar(“foo“) is “bar“.



   Verify functionality of single component
   Allow safe refactoring of code parts
   Must run successfully on each change
   Test is written with/before code
Acceptance Tests




                              Check that a click on button
                          „Put on shopping cart“ puts the item
                                 into the shopping cart

   Verify the functional requirements
   Ensure the overall application usability
   Test specification provided by stakeholder
Smoke Tests




                  Check that the url of a product page
                    is really showing a product page


 Verify the overall application functionality
 Good to identify crucial bugs
Separation Of Concerns

 Separation of task in independent blocks
    Loose coupling between components
    Heavy use of dependency injection

  Browser
                          MVC as an example
                             Model: Exchange and storage of data
                             View: Representaton of data
  Controller   View
                             Controller: Application Logic
               Utility


   Model
                          Decoupling of unit tests
 ORM/DBAL
Inversion Of Control

 Removal of static assignments
   Framework only works with abstraction of components
   Object graph is instantiated dynamically
 Separation of execution and implementation
Unit Testing in PHP

 phpunit: Status quo for testing in PHP
    Created by Sebastian Bergmann
    Originated as port of Junit
    Supports various features / extensions
 Framework for embedding tests in application
    Execution as test suite for an project
    Mocking of injected objects
    Code & coverage analysis
 Various functions for test assertions
Test Components in Symfony

 Unit Tests
     Enforce usage of dependency injection
     Testing of DBAL, model and relations
     Testing of components, utility classes
     Mocking of dependencies
 Functional Tests
   Testing page reachability
   Testing of page content and links
   Easy utilization for smoke tests
  http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/testing.html
Behaviour Driven Development

   Enhancement to Test-Driven Development
   Introduced by Dan North in 2006
   Tests act as functional specification
   Missing link between developer and stakeholder
       Justify functional requirements at beginning
       Software developed against functional specification
       Specified in a formal language (no experts needed)
       Clear focus on functionality
BDD Test Specification


    Scenario: Put item in shopping cart
    Given the case, the customer wants to buy a movie
       And his shopping cart is empty
       And there are 2 movies in stock
    When he puts the item in the shopping cart
    Then the item should show up in the shopping cart
       And the shopping cart counter should show 1
       And 1 movie should be in stock
BDD Testing Bundles



 Behat
 Bundle
            Integration of Behat into Symfony

  Mink
 Bundle     Integration of Mink into Symfony

 Behat      Test Engine for executing Gherking test case

  Mink      Encapsulation of different browser drivers
  Gherkin   Formal language to describe test cases
Other Testing Bundles

 DoctrineFixturesBundle
   Preparation of test data sets
 LiipFunctionalTestBundle
   Simplifies preparation and execution
   Utilizes DoctrineFixturesBundle
 PSSMockeryBundle (Symfony2MockerExtension)
   Mocking of services in DIC
   Demarcation of tests
Continuous Integration

 Continuous process to apply quality control
 Various CI Systems available
    Bamboo, Jenkins, CruiseControl
 Successfull development process for CI
      Direct feedback -> Short execution times
      Frequent checkins
      Commits to trunk
      Automated test chain
      Automated deploy -> Continuous delivery
Continuous Integration




                                             Automated Build
                                                Smoke Tests
                                                Unit Tests
                 Periodical Build
                                                Syntax Tests
                    Smoke Tests                Coding Standards
                    Unit Tests                 Copy/Paste Detection
                    Syntax Tests               Documentation
                    Coding Standards
                    Copy/Paste Detection
                    Documentation
                 +   Acceptance Tests
                 +   Other intensive tests
Favoured Test Suite

 Test-Driven Development
    Testing influences whole development process
    Loose coupling of components
 Test chain according to granularities
      Smoke Tests: Routes, Firewalls (Reachability)
      Unit Tests: Modular components, Utility classes
      DBAL Tests: Entity, Relations and Repository
      BDD Tests: User Interface (Usability)
 Continuous Integration System
    Triggers test chain on each commit
    Verifies state before final deploy
Lessons learned

   Commitment to TDD needed
   Testing influences software design
   Testing takes its time
   Quality can hardly be achieved later on
   Full test coverage almost unachievable
   Regression tests need automated test suite
   Testing only way to ensure software quality
Questions



            Questions regarding the practical
            usage probably covered in part 2

Regression Testing with Symfony

  • 1.
    Regression Testing withSymfony Tools and techniques for building your test suite
  • 2.
    Introducing the speaker Joachim Unger @joeywannabe Symfony Explorer since 2.0 Web Developer since 2010 Former scientist at ABB Robotics Software Developer @LittleBird GmbH Berlin
  • 3.
    Part 1: Exploringthe techiques  Regression Testing  Test granularities in web projects  Basic design patterns  Symfony test components  Behaviour Driven Development  Continuous Integration  Lessons learned
  • 4.
    Regression Tests  Discover new software bugs (regression)  Verify bugfixes on existing functionality  Validate changes against other components  Include rerunning previously run tests  Run on each code change  Ensure product quality  Minimize risks
  • 5.
    Types of RegressionTests  Progressive Regression Tests  Specification has changed  Code has been changed > Add new test cases  Correcting Regression Tests  Specification has not changed  Test code changes against existing test cases
  • 6.
    Regression Tests inweb projects  Defined test strategy  Test-Driven Programming  Tests for all code changes (e.g. bugfixes)  Tests have to be up-to-date  Continuous Refactoring  Automated Test Suite  Run on each code change  Smoke, Acceptance and Unit Tests  Continuous Integration
  • 7.
    Software Quality  Functional Quality  Error-free execution of application  Strongly influences user acceptance Browser  Structural Quality Controller View  Design and structure of code Utility  Loose coupling of components  Ensures extensibility of code Model ORM/DBAL
  • 8.
    Unit Tests Assert that the result of foobar(“foo“) is “bar“.  Verify functionality of single component  Allow safe refactoring of code parts  Must run successfully on each change  Test is written with/before code
  • 9.
    Acceptance Tests Check that a click on button „Put on shopping cart“ puts the item into the shopping cart  Verify the functional requirements  Ensure the overall application usability  Test specification provided by stakeholder
  • 10.
    Smoke Tests Check that the url of a product page is really showing a product page  Verify the overall application functionality  Good to identify crucial bugs
  • 11.
    Separation Of Concerns Separation of task in independent blocks  Loose coupling between components  Heavy use of dependency injection Browser  MVC as an example  Model: Exchange and storage of data  View: Representaton of data Controller View  Controller: Application Logic Utility Model  Decoupling of unit tests ORM/DBAL
  • 12.
    Inversion Of Control Removal of static assignments  Framework only works with abstraction of components  Object graph is instantiated dynamically  Separation of execution and implementation
  • 13.
    Unit Testing inPHP  phpunit: Status quo for testing in PHP  Created by Sebastian Bergmann  Originated as port of Junit  Supports various features / extensions  Framework for embedding tests in application  Execution as test suite for an project  Mocking of injected objects  Code & coverage analysis  Various functions for test assertions
  • 14.
    Test Components inSymfony  Unit Tests  Enforce usage of dependency injection  Testing of DBAL, model and relations  Testing of components, utility classes  Mocking of dependencies  Functional Tests  Testing page reachability  Testing of page content and links  Easy utilization for smoke tests http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/testing.html
  • 15.
    Behaviour Driven Development  Enhancement to Test-Driven Development  Introduced by Dan North in 2006  Tests act as functional specification  Missing link between developer and stakeholder  Justify functional requirements at beginning  Software developed against functional specification  Specified in a formal language (no experts needed)  Clear focus on functionality
  • 16.
    BDD Test Specification Scenario: Put item in shopping cart Given the case, the customer wants to buy a movie And his shopping cart is empty And there are 2 movies in stock When he puts the item in the shopping cart Then the item should show up in the shopping cart And the shopping cart counter should show 1 And 1 movie should be in stock
  • 17.
    BDD Testing Bundles Behat Bundle Integration of Behat into Symfony Mink Bundle Integration of Mink into Symfony Behat Test Engine for executing Gherking test case Mink Encapsulation of different browser drivers Gherkin Formal language to describe test cases
  • 18.
    Other Testing Bundles DoctrineFixturesBundle  Preparation of test data sets  LiipFunctionalTestBundle  Simplifies preparation and execution  Utilizes DoctrineFixturesBundle  PSSMockeryBundle (Symfony2MockerExtension)  Mocking of services in DIC  Demarcation of tests
  • 19.
    Continuous Integration  Continuousprocess to apply quality control  Various CI Systems available  Bamboo, Jenkins, CruiseControl  Successfull development process for CI  Direct feedback -> Short execution times  Frequent checkins  Commits to trunk  Automated test chain  Automated deploy -> Continuous delivery
  • 20.
    Continuous Integration Automated Build  Smoke Tests  Unit Tests Periodical Build  Syntax Tests  Smoke Tests  Coding Standards  Unit Tests  Copy/Paste Detection  Syntax Tests  Documentation  Coding Standards  Copy/Paste Detection  Documentation + Acceptance Tests + Other intensive tests
  • 21.
    Favoured Test Suite Test-Driven Development  Testing influences whole development process  Loose coupling of components  Test chain according to granularities  Smoke Tests: Routes, Firewalls (Reachability)  Unit Tests: Modular components, Utility classes  DBAL Tests: Entity, Relations and Repository  BDD Tests: User Interface (Usability)  Continuous Integration System  Triggers test chain on each commit  Verifies state before final deploy
  • 22.
    Lessons learned  Commitment to TDD needed  Testing influences software design  Testing takes its time  Quality can hardly be achieved later on  Full test coverage almost unachievable  Regression tests need automated test suite  Testing only way to ensure software quality
  • 23.
    Questions Questions regarding the practical usage probably covered in part 2