Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Hieu Le Trung
   Enterprise Architect
   The merging of JUnit + Cobertura/Emma +
    Testdox
   The merging of NUnit + NCover + Troy
...
   Enterprise Architect supports
       UML 2.0
       Languages: C++, C#, Java, Delphi, VB.Net, Visual Basic,
        ...
   JUnit
       Unit test framework
   Cobertura / Emma
       Test coverage compare to source code tool
   Testdox
 ...
   The same as Java but on .NET platform
   NUnit
       Unit test framework
   NCover
       Test coverage compare t...
Develop
     Requirement                      In case the sub-model is developed
                                       by...
   Use Enterprise Architect to enforce
    development head first on Unit Test
   Apply Peer Review into Unit Test
    d...
   Pros
       Can think first the unit test design
       Easier for developer since the methods have been designed an...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Model For Applying Unit Test

659 views

Published on

A model for applying unit test

Published in: Technology
  • Hi there! Get Your Professional Job-Winning Resume Here - Check our website! http://bit.ly/resumpro
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Model For Applying Unit Test

  1. 1. Hieu Le Trung
  2. 2.  Enterprise Architect  The merging of JUnit + Cobertura/Emma + Testdox  The merging of NUnit + NCover + Troy  Process at R&D  Issues Page 2
  3. 3.  Enterprise Architect supports  UML 2.0  Languages: C++, C#, Java, Delphi, VB.Net, Visual Basic, ActionScript, PHP and Python  Requirement Management  Database Modeling  Forward and Reverse-engineering  Document generation  Testing Support  Unit tests  Integration tests  System tests  Acceptance tests  Scenarios  Traceability Page 3
  4. 4.  JUnit  Unit test framework  Cobertura / Emma  Test coverage compare to source code tool  Testdox  Test coverage compare to requirement tool  Generate unit test documentation from source code  Example  From  To  The merging of those tools helps  Unit test our module  Verify the unit test coverage with source code  Verify the unit test coverage with requirement Page 4
  5. 5.  The same as Java but on .NET platform  NUnit  Unit test framework  NCover  Test coverage compare to source code tool  Troy  Test coverage compare to design spec tool  The merging of those tools helps  Unit test our module  Verify the unit test coverage with source code  Verify the unit test coverage with design spec Page 5
  6. 6. Develop Requirement In case the sub-model is developed by developer, we can re-organize the test generation in the design review phase Design Architecture During the project executing Sync source code and unit test with model Generate Unit Test from Architecture Modify Unit Test Generate source code design and unit test Page 6
  7. 7.  Use Enterprise Architect to enforce development head first on Unit Test  Apply Peer Review into Unit Test development: one developer, one unit tester  Maybe 1 unit tester for many developers  Use Category of NUnit or JUnit or MbUnit to classify long run test  New-created test always fails Page 7
  8. 8.  Pros  Can think first the unit test design  Easier for developer since the methods have been designed and generated for him, he’s just need to write the logic  Cons  Burden for software architecture  Depend much on tools: Enterprise Architect  Issues  Refactoring the test code  Un-clear requirement (minor)  Mock object for XML-RPC  Tests which depend on environment such as COM interface  Test coverage on .NET  Yes, much effort ! Page 8

×