TAI - To use the language of learning to develop students’ ability in  improving their understanding of the learning process. To raise Achieved grades to Merit or Excellence. A class chosen by individual teachers will be used for this inquiry.

1. TAI
To use the language of learning to develop students’ ability
in improving their understanding of the learning process.
To raise Achieved grades to Merit or Excellence.
A class chosen by individual teachers will be used for this
inquiry.
Achieved Merit Excellence
AIM
Describe
Explain
Examples
How
Analyse
Why
Conclusions
Results
Evaluate

2. • Incorporated AKO and the three story intellect
into lessons.
• Getting Students to E, M and A
• Level 2 Media Studies
• Achievement Standard 91250 Demonstrate
understanding of representation in the media

3. • Analyse and evaluate diagnostic terms.
• Apply language of learning terminology such as gather,
process apply, to established units of work and certain
classes.
• Familiarise students with learning terminology.
• Re-test students at a later stage to see difference.
• Feature AKO language prominently in our classrooms
for easy reference.
• Actively incorporate three story intellect levels of skills
and thinking into class work and activities (explicitly
and implicitly)

4. I used AKO and SAMR
• Using graphic organisers
• Broke down criteria - Explain Everything
• PD – SAMR
• Cluster meetings

5. • Improving their understanding of the learning
process.
• To raise Achieved grades to Merit or
Excellence.
• More enjoyable lessons

6. • What happened because of my actions?
• How did the results reflect this?

7. • Google Form
• Student results
• Refocus teaching
– One to one
– Groups

8. 2014
Achievement Standard 91250 Demonstrate understanding of representation
in the media
• Excellence -
• 22% - 7%
• Merit +
• 30% - 47%
• Achieved -
• 32% -20%
• Not Achieved +
• 16% - 27%

9. 2015
Achievement Standard 91250 Demonstrate understanding of representation
in the media
• Excellence +
• 23% - 33%
• Merit -
• 30% -22%
• Achieved +
• 32% - 33%
• Not Achieved -
• 16% -11%

10. 2014 2015
• Excellence -
• 22% - 7%
• Merit +
• 30% - 47%
• Achieved -
• 32% -20%
• Not Achieved +
• 16% - 27%
• Excellence +
• 23% - 33%
• Merit -
• 30% -22%
• Achieved +
• 32% - 33%
• Not Achieved -
• 16% -11%
Standard

11. 2014- Overall
• Excellence -
• 20%- 17%
• Merit +
• 25% - 37%
• Achieved -
• 39% - 36%
• Not Achieved -
• 16% – 11%

12. 2015 – Over All
• Excellence
• 20%- 23%
• Merit
• 25% – 43%
• Achieved
• 39%- 43%
• Not Achieved
• 15%- 10%

13. Over all Analysis
2014
• Excellence -
• 20%- 17%
• Merit +
• 25% - 37%
• Achieved -
• 39% - 36%
• Not Achieved -
• 16% – 11%
2015
• Excellence +
• 20%- 23%
• Merit +
• 25% – 43%
• Achieved +
• 39%- 43%
• Not Achieved -
• 15%- 10%

14. • NCEA Marking
• Feedback with Media Teachers
• Notes
• Report

15. Explain Everything
iBook
AKO and SAMR
Independent learners
TRUMP