This presentation discusses recent trends in the case law of the European Court of Justice in relation to three public procurement issues: the exemption for in-house provision and public-public cooperation, the requirements derived from general principles of procurement law, and the rules on discretionary exclusion and self-cleaning.
Analysis of recent procurement reforms from perspective of flexibilityAlbert Sanchez Graells
This presentation assesses the reform of the EU public procurement rules in 2014 from the perspective of flexibility. It reflects on legal and case law changes in the period 2011-2017.
When does competition end? A staged approach to procurement modificationsAlbert Sanchez Graells
Presentation given at the "Contract changes in a European perspective" workshop organised by the Danish Public Procurement Association (Dansk Forening for Udbudsret). It discusses the limitations of the approach implicit in Article 72 of Directive 2014/24/EU and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
This presentation discusses some of the potential impacts that Brexit and the June 2017 election can have for NHS procurement in England. It was used in the Brexit, Regulation and Society Seminar held by ManReg in Manchester on 13 June 2017.
Procurement issues SCF unfair competition from the public sector (glasgow, se...Albert Sanchez Graells
Presentation given at the Scottish Competition Forum on public procurement issues concerning potential unfair competition from the public sector in commercial markets.
Slides of the presentation given to the Annual Meeting of the Network of Agencies Procurement Officers on recent case law of the Court of Justice on selected public procurement matters.
Procurement and labour objectives: some thoughts on regulatory substitution a...Albert Sanchez Graells
These are the slides for a presentation at the event Procurement and labour objectives organised by Richard Craven at the University of Leicester on 16 February 2017. They discuss issues of regulatory substitution between labour market and public procurement regulation in the EU.
These are the slides of my presentation at the UEA Law School on 23 November 2016. They synthesise my current thoughts about the analysis of public procurement as a case study from the perspective of the potential emergence of trans-EU public law.
Analysis of recent procurement reforms from perspective of flexibilityAlbert Sanchez Graells
This presentation assesses the reform of the EU public procurement rules in 2014 from the perspective of flexibility. It reflects on legal and case law changes in the period 2011-2017.
When does competition end? A staged approach to procurement modificationsAlbert Sanchez Graells
Presentation given at the "Contract changes in a European perspective" workshop organised by the Danish Public Procurement Association (Dansk Forening for Udbudsret). It discusses the limitations of the approach implicit in Article 72 of Directive 2014/24/EU and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
This presentation discusses some of the potential impacts that Brexit and the June 2017 election can have for NHS procurement in England. It was used in the Brexit, Regulation and Society Seminar held by ManReg in Manchester on 13 June 2017.
Procurement issues SCF unfair competition from the public sector (glasgow, se...Albert Sanchez Graells
Presentation given at the Scottish Competition Forum on public procurement issues concerning potential unfair competition from the public sector in commercial markets.
Slides of the presentation given to the Annual Meeting of the Network of Agencies Procurement Officers on recent case law of the Court of Justice on selected public procurement matters.
Procurement and labour objectives: some thoughts on regulatory substitution a...Albert Sanchez Graells
These are the slides for a presentation at the event Procurement and labour objectives organised by Richard Craven at the University of Leicester on 16 February 2017. They discuss issues of regulatory substitution between labour market and public procurement regulation in the EU.
These are the slides of my presentation at the UEA Law School on 23 November 2016. They synthesise my current thoughts about the analysis of public procurement as a case study from the perspective of the potential emergence of trans-EU public law.
Post-Brexit public procurement: challenges and regulatory solutionsAlbert Sanchez Graells
These are the slides for the talk on post-Brexit public procurement I will give at the MaCCI conference on Trade Relations after Brexit: Impetus for the Negotiation Process, to be held in Mannheim in 25-26 January 2018.
This presentation is the basis for a lunchtime seminar on the interaction between competition, State aid and public procurement rules, and the challenges in designing an effective enforcement mechanism that ensures coordinated substantive assessments.
These are the slides for the lunchtime staff workshop I gave at the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 9 February 2018 on recent trends in EEA public procurement law.
Presentation given on 14 April 2016 at the "ERA annual public procurement conference 2016", covering issues of procurement centralisation and public registers of public contracts
Competition and state aid implications of minimum wage in procurementAlbert Sanchez Graells
This presentation explores the competition law and State aid implications of the RegioPost Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It was presented at the University of Bristol Law School on 9 May 2016
The EU’s Joint Procurement Agreement: how does it work, and why did the UK no...Albert Sanchez Graells
This presentation discusses the EU's Joint Procurement Agreement for the procurement of medical countermeasures, its main characteristics and key legal issues. It also discusses the UK's decision not to participate in the JPA for ventilators in response to the COVID-19 crisis.
Željka Kordej-De Villa, Diana Kopeva, Žaneta Stasiskiene. Circular Economy and Green Public Procurement – Cases of Bulgaria, Croatia and Lithuania. Circular Economy Congress, Lisbon, July 2018.
Presentation by Maria Stylianidou, Hellenic Open University, Greece (ENG) Second SIGMA Regional ENP East Conference on Public Procurement, Kyiv 29-30 May 2018.
This presentation by Italy (AGCM), was made during the presentations on “Tools for Addressing Competitive Neutrality” held at the 67th meeting of the OECD Working Party No.2 of the Competition Committee on 3 June 2019. More information on the topic can be found at ww.oecd.org/competition/competitive-neutrality.htm.
Post-Brexit public procurement: challenges and regulatory solutionsAlbert Sanchez Graells
These are the slides for the talk on post-Brexit public procurement I will give at the MaCCI conference on Trade Relations after Brexit: Impetus for the Negotiation Process, to be held in Mannheim in 25-26 January 2018.
This presentation is the basis for a lunchtime seminar on the interaction between competition, State aid and public procurement rules, and the challenges in designing an effective enforcement mechanism that ensures coordinated substantive assessments.
These are the slides for the lunchtime staff workshop I gave at the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 9 February 2018 on recent trends in EEA public procurement law.
Presentation given on 14 April 2016 at the "ERA annual public procurement conference 2016", covering issues of procurement centralisation and public registers of public contracts
Competition and state aid implications of minimum wage in procurementAlbert Sanchez Graells
This presentation explores the competition law and State aid implications of the RegioPost Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It was presented at the University of Bristol Law School on 9 May 2016
The EU’s Joint Procurement Agreement: how does it work, and why did the UK no...Albert Sanchez Graells
This presentation discusses the EU's Joint Procurement Agreement for the procurement of medical countermeasures, its main characteristics and key legal issues. It also discusses the UK's decision not to participate in the JPA for ventilators in response to the COVID-19 crisis.
Željka Kordej-De Villa, Diana Kopeva, Žaneta Stasiskiene. Circular Economy and Green Public Procurement – Cases of Bulgaria, Croatia and Lithuania. Circular Economy Congress, Lisbon, July 2018.
Presentation by Maria Stylianidou, Hellenic Open University, Greece (ENG) Second SIGMA Regional ENP East Conference on Public Procurement, Kyiv 29-30 May 2018.
This presentation by Italy (AGCM), was made during the presentations on “Tools for Addressing Competitive Neutrality” held at the 67th meeting of the OECD Working Party No.2 of the Competition Committee on 3 June 2019. More information on the topic can be found at ww.oecd.org/competition/competitive-neutrality.htm.
Presentation by Aleksandra Melesko on the Case-law of the Court of Justice of the EU, at the SIGMA webinar on public procurement reality and challenges of post COVID, held on 26 January 2021.
Presentation "PPPs and concessions, the planning, procurement, implementation and management" made during the SIGMA workshop on Auditing Public Private Partnerships and Concessions. Ankara, 2-3 May 2018. Presentation made by Mag. Martin Oder, LL.M., SIGMA.
We discuss the implications that the new EU directive is having and what other legislation may be introduced in the coming decade that could shape procurement in the future?
Presented by: Andrew Millross (Anthony Collins Solicitors LLP) at PfH Live 2014
Presentation "Auditing PPP- Lessons learned from the French experience" made during the SIGMA workshop on Auditing Public Private Partnerships and Concessions. Ankara, 2-3 May 2018. Presentation made by Frederic Angermann, SIGMA.
WIth the go-live date of MiFID II just around the corner, I take the liberty to offer you an overview of regulations coming in the next period and which should have your focus.
Also, I take the opportunity to wish you all a Happy, Successful and Healthy 2018!
The enclosed presentation covers a number of the most important regulatory topics to hit the financial markets as of 2018.
Our April public sector breakfast club covered a procurement case law update and the impact of Brexit.
We covered the key cases over the past 12 months or so and what they really mean for practitioners. We also looked at what Brexit might mean for procurement law both immediately and what could happen in the medium to longer term.
Visit our website for more useful resources - https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/sectors/public-sector
For our March edition of public matters:
• Steven Brunning summarises the main points of the new public procurement regime and provides a summary of the latest case on lifting the automatic suspension in relation to procurement challenges
• Anja Beriro explores the latest public procurement policy notes issued by the Cabinet Office
• Neil Walker provides two interesting articles on some important property related cases.
Presentation by Karen Hill and Daniel Ivarsson, SIGMA, at the SIGMA regional conference on public procurement, which took place in Beirut on 2-3 June 2015. Also available in Arabic and French.
Professor i EU-rätt vid University of Cambridge. Barnard är en av Europas ledande experter på arbetsrätt kopplat till EU-rätten och har gett ut flera böcker inom området.
Procuring Community Services and Outcome Based CommissioningClever Together
Robert Breedon (Partner, Wragge & Co) is an experienced commercial lawyer with expertise in the healthcare sector having worked at the Department of Health from 2006 to 2011. He advises on a range of commercial transactions including the use of various contractual models and commercial structures for the delivery of clinical services. He regularly advises on the use of innovative contractual structures (such as Alliance contracts and other joint ventures) for the delivery of integrated care.
Robert leads Wragge Lawrence Graham's support for Commissioners and has advised a number of CCGs on collaborative arrangements between health and social care commissioners. He also advises a number of independent sector clients who provide services or products to the NHS.
Systemic risk and corporate governance_a reflection based on the UK energy cr...Albert Sanchez Graells
In this lecture, I reflect on the limits of the UK Stewardship Code 2020 in facilitating the identification and reaction to (non-financial) systemic risks, using the UK energy crisis as a springboard.
In this presentation, I stress the need to carry on with efforts to achieve higher levels of digitalisation and sustainability in procurement, despite the challenges and reallocation of resources required by the reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Challenges and opportunities for UK procurement during and after the COVID-19...Albert Sanchez Graells
These are the slides for the presentation on "Challenges and opportunities for UK procurement during and after the COVID-19 crisis" that I gave at the LUPC/SUPC conference webinars on 30 April 2020
This presentation discusses the EU's reaction to the opportunities and challenges of the fourth industrial revolution in the area of public procurement law and policy, with a special focus on innovation procurement and procurement digitalisation.
Data-driven and digital procurement governance:Two well-known elephant talesAlbert Sanchez Graells
This presentation assesses emerging regulatory trends in data-driven and digital public procurement governance and, in particular, the European Commission’s ambition for the single digital procurement market. It was delivered at the Information Law and Policy Centre's Annual Lecture and Conference held at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in London on 22 November 2019
This presentation focuses on the interaction between the strategic goals to foster more sustainable procurement and procurement digitalisation in the European Union. Exploratory thoughts shared at the Seminar of the Patrimonial Law Research Group of the Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona on 7 November 2019.
Delivering public services through contract_competing approaches to the gover...Albert Sanchez Graells
These are the slides of the presentation we gave at the Contract Theory Workshop held in Bristol in June 2019. They present an outline of our current work on the governance of public service delivery through public, private and hybrid institutions.
Procurement governance and complex technologies: a promising future?Albert Sanchez Graells
This is the presentation I will give at the AGM of the UK's Procurement Lawyers Association on 6 March 2019. Its content critically assesses the impacts that complex technologies such as blockchain (or smart contracts), artificial intelligence (including big data) and the internet of things could have for public procurement governance and oversight.
Understanding the Catalan Conflict from a Spanish Constitutional PerspectiveAlbert Sanchez Graells
These are the slides of the talk I gave at the University of Bristol Law School in the context of the Bristol Law Conference lecture series. The content is update as of 30 October 2017.
Understanding the Catalan Conflict from a Spanish Constitutional PerspectiveAlbert Sanchez Graells
This is a draft presentation I am preparing for a lecture on the Catalan independentism challenge of September and October 2017, and how to assess it under the Spanish constitutional framework.
This are the slides for an introductory lecture on behavioural law and economics I gave as part of the economic analysis of law unit at the University of Bristol Law School in March 2017.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Recent ECJ public procurement case law on selected topics
1. Recent ECJ procurement case law on
in-house & public-public cooperation, general
principles and exclusion of economic
operators
Dr Albert Sanchez-Graells
Hankinta- ja logistiikka-alan neuvottelupäivät
Helsinki, 1-2 June 2017
2 June 2017
1Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law
2. Agenda
• The purpose of this more targeted session is to
discuss specific issues concerning ECJ case law
• In-house and public-public exemptions from
compliance with the EU public procurement rules
• General principles of procurement
• Exclusion of economic operators and self-cleaning
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 2
2 June 2017
3. In-house and public-public cooperation—
basics of the system
• Art 12 Dir 2014/24/EU consolidates both the
Teckal and Commission v Germany exemptions
from compliance with procurement rules
• They raise both issues concerning elements of control or
inter-administrative links, and issues concerning the
acceptable threshold of market activities
• The extent to which centralised procurement bodies (CPBs)
can fit within one of the exceptions is unclear
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 3
2 June 2017
4. In-house exemption
• In terms of control
• Situations of single control over an in-house entity are
relatively clear, but jointly owned entities create challenges
• The in-house exemption applies where the contracting entity
can demonstrate that it “not only holds capital in that entity,
but also plays a role in its managing bodies” [Econord,
C 182/11 and C 183/11, EU:C:2012:758 [33], see‑ ‑ here]
• Art 12(2) & (3) Dir 2014/24/EU significantly expand the scope
of the public house—triggering the need to analyse indirect
control of type foreseen in Teckal (C-107/98, EU:C:1999:562)
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 4
2 June 2017
5. Econord, C 182/11 & C 183/11,‑ ‑
EU:C:2012:758
• Contracting authorities merely entered into "a
shareholders’ agreement conferring on them the right
to be consulted, to appoint a member of the supervisory
council and to nominate a member of the management
board, in agreement with the other authorities
concerned”
• ECJ required analysis of whether this “enable[d] those
municipal councils to contribute effectively to the control of”
the in-house entity
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 5
2 June 2017
6. In-house exemption
• In terms of limited market activities
• “any activity … which is devoted to persons other than those
which control it, namely persons without any relationship of
control in regard to that entity, including public authorities,
must be regarded as being carried out for the benefit of a
third party”—Undis Servizi, C-553/15, EU:C:2016:935 [34]
• The 80/20 threshold created by the Directive is a maximum
level of tolerance. Given that the ECJ has consistently insisted
on a narrow interpretation of the exemption, a rule that
reduces that threshold is not contrary to EU law (*)
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 6
2 June 2017
7. Undis Servizi, C-553/15, EU:C:2016:935
• Case where the province, which did not control
the in-house entity, entrusted the provision of
services for municipalities that were not
shareholders of the in-house entity
• ECJ stressed the need for the entrusting authority
(the province) and(/or) the beneficiaries of the
services to hold control over the in-house entity
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 7
2 June 2017
8. In-house exemption—why is a tighter
approach not contrary to EU law?
• Rationale for the exemption is clear
• Ensure that EU PP rules remain applicable in the event that an
in-house undertaking is active in the market—Undis [33]
• Ensure alignment of interests between contracting authority
and in-house entity (including shareholders)—C. H. de Setúbal
& SUCH, C-574/12, EU:C:2014:2004 (see here)
• Ensure that accumulation of exemptions from procurement
rules do not result in public sector-facing commercial activity
not subjected to any controls (by analogy, OAG LitSpecMet)
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 8
2 June 2017
9. C. H. de Setúbal & SUCH,
C-574/12, EU:C:2014:2004
• A Portuguese hospital awarded a services contract for
the provision of meals to patients and staff to a non-
profit organisation which membership included public
entities (such as other hospitals) as well as private social
solidarity institutions carrying out non-profit activities
• ECJ held that non-profit nature of private members of in-
house entity was irrelevant for the purposes of avoiding the
exclusion of the applicability of the exemption
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 9
2 June 2017
10. In-house exemption—why is a tighter
approach not contrary to EU law?
• Test is compatible with competition law
• Tighter link between economic/non-economic activities Easy-
Pay & Finance Engineering, C-185/14, EU:C:2015:716 (here)
• Test aims to avoid situations of cross-subsidisation
• Including distortions of competition based on a de facto
dominant position (in the public market)
• To what extent is this applicable to CPBs?
• Test aims to avoid situations of opaque State aid
• In particular through direct award of favourable contracts
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 10
2 June 2017
11. EasyPay & Finance Engineering,
C-185/14, EU:C:2015:716
• Case concerning the Bulgarian reservation of
activity consisting in the payment through postal
remittance of social security pensions
• ECJ adopted an approach more refined than FENIN-Selex
(where purchasing was considered non-economic) and
indicated that test is likely to shift towards needs for
‘inseparable connection’ of activities
• This is potentially particularly relevant for CPBs
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 11
2 June 2017
12. Public-public cooperation exemption
• The scope of the cooperation raises some questions, in
particular due to the ‘cooperative requirement’ for the
participating entities to ensure “that public services they
have to perform are provided with a view to achieving
objectives they have in common” (Art 12(4)(a))
• Does this exclude accumulation of in-house?
• Where is the ‘outer limit’ of the cooperative mechanism? Cfr
Art 1(6) Dir 2014/24/EU—Remondis, C-51/15, EU:C:2016:985
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 12
2 June 2017
13. Remondis, C-51/15, EU:C:2016:985
• Transfer of competence from contracting authorities to
a jointly-established entity, where the entity kept
increasing share of market activity
• Formation of a special-purpose association with legal
personality governed by public law and transfer of
competences does not constitute a ‘public contract’ … if it
concerns both the responsibilities associated with the
transferred competence and the powers that are the corollary
thereof, so that the newly competent public authority has
decision-making and financial autonomy
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 13
2 June 2017
14. Must the public-public cooperation involve
(services) covered by the Directive?
• Must the analysis of Art 12(4) & (5) be followed in all
cases, or solely where the authorities seek to
collaborate for services covered by the Directive?
• In my view, the underlying services need to be covered by the
Directive—e.g. in ambulance services, the exemption in Art
10(h) Dir 2014/24 only covers emergency services provided by
non-profit organisations. Thus, public-public cooperation for
the provision of those services (or non-emergency ones)
should be assessed under public-public cooperation rules
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 14
2 June 2017
15. Must the public-public cooperation involve
(services) covered by the Directive?
• (con’t)
• However, even where the Directive does not apply (or does
not apply in full—old B services and new light touch regime),
an analysis still needs to be carried out to assess whether the
contract is of cross-border interest and, if so, an analysis of the
justification (and proportionality) for the direct award to
another public entity may be appropriate
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 15
2 June 2017
16. General principles of procurement—
main issues in their application
• General principles of procurement law have
been consolidated in Art 18(1) Dir 2014/24/EU
• Case law of the ECJ on the basis of general
principles usually tends to modulate the
interpretation of existing rules (e.g. interaction
of transparency and rules on award criteria,
recently in TNS Dimarso, C-6/15, EU:C:2016:555)
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 16
2 June 2017
17. TNS Dimarso, C-6/15, EU:C:2016:555
• Case concerned the obligation of contracting
authorities to disclose evaluation methods prior to the
opening of the tenders
• ECJ declared that there is no such obligation if there are
circumstances that justify impossibility of disclosure
• But also stressed that the determination by of the method of
evaluation after the publication of the contract notice or the
tender specifications cannot have the effect of altering the
award criteria or their relative weighting
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 17
2 June 2017
18. General principles of procurement—
main issues in their application
• In my view, the requirements derived from
general principles are not sufficiently precise to
allow a Member State to run a (below-threshold)
procurement system solely on their basis
• Similar issues arise with the GPA or UNCAC
• General principles serve as control on discretion,
but require reinventing the wheel often
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 18
2 June 2017
19. General principles of procurement—
main issues in their application
• Equal treatment / non-discrimination
• “the principle of equal treatment requires tenderers to be
afforded equality of opportunity when formulating their
tenders, which therefore implies that the tenders of all
tenderers must be subject to the same conditions”—Pizzo,
C 27/15, EU:C:2016:404 [36]‑
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 19
2 June 2017
20. Pizzo, C 27/15, EU:C:2016:404‑
• Exclusion of tenderers on the basis of lack of payment
of an administrative fee which obligatory nature was
not obvious (derived from general interpretation of
administrative law)
• ECJ allowed the contracting authority to provide an
opportunity to satisfy the formal requirement before
proceeding to the exclusion of the tenderers
• In my view, this should have gone further and the ECJ should
have made it a requirement
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 20
2 June 2017
21. General principles of procurement—
main issues in their application
• Equal treatment / non-discrimination
• Its application is oftentimes complicated by the risk
of falling into a trap of tender-specific reasoning
• It ultimately boils down to (strict) proportionality
assessments and the contracting authority will have
be particularly careful to follow its pre-published
own rules
21
2 June 2017
22. General principles of procurement—
main issues in their application
• Transparency
• [corollary of the principle of equal treatment] “implies that all
the conditions and detailed rules of the award procedure must
be drawn up in a clear, precise and unequivocal manner in the
contract notice or specifications so that, first, all reasonably
informed tenderers exercising ordinary care can understand
their exact significance and interpret them in the same way
and, second, the contracting authority is able to ascertain
whether the tenders submitted satisfy the criteria applying to
the contract in question”—Pizzo [36]
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 22
2 June 2017
23. General principles of procurement—
main issues in their application
• Transparency
• Contracting authorities need to allow economic
operators to gain information on contract
opportunities, to get a fairly detailed idea of the
tender procedure and a precise idea of participation
requirements, technical specifications and award
criteria—as well as the possibility to seek reasons for
any decision (ie both ex ante & ex post transparency)
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 23
2 June 2017
24. General principles of procurement—
main issues in their application
• Combined effect
• “the principles of transparency and equal treatment which
govern all procedures for the award of public contracts
require the substantive and procedural conditions concerning
participation in a contract to be clearly defined in advance
and made public, in particular the obligations of tenderers, in
order that those tenderers may know exactly the procedural
requirements and be sure that the same requirements apply
to all candidates”—Pizzo [37]
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 24
2 June 2017
25. General principles of procurement—
main issues in their application
• Competition (modulation of proportionality)
• Contracting authorities must not unduly restrict
competition for public contracts (this is also linked to
any domestic principle of value for money)
• Equally proportionate decisions need to be
competition-oriented, so that restrictions are
minimised where a least restrictive option is
available (in line with free movement analysis)
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 25
2 June 2017
26. Exclusion of economic operators—
Responsibility to ensure a level playing field
• Contracting authorities have an increasing
discretion (and duty) concerning the exclusion of
economic operators
• Art 57(4) is particularly relevant
• Art 57(6) can create new challenges in terms of
assessment of corporate compliance programmes
implemented as part of self-cleaning measures
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 26
2 June 2017
27. Exclusion of economic operators—
Responsibility to ensure a level playing field
• Contracting authorities will increasingly find
themselves in a position where they require
specialised support
• E.g. from tax authorities or competition authorities, in
particular in order to assess self-cleaning measures
• Are the administrative structures prepared for that
collaboration?
• Is there a central register? Does it work?
27
2 June 2017
28. Exclusion of economic operators—
Responsibility to ensure a level playing field
• It is also important to stress that the existence of
a discretionary exclusion ground cannot be
simply disregarded, but must be assessed in light
of the general discretion of the authority, as well
as of the duty to provide reasons
• Two important recent cases
• Connexxion Taxi Services, C-171/15, EU:C:2016:948
• Marina del Mediterráneo, C-391/15, EU:C:2017:268
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 28
2 June 2017
29. Connexxion Taxi Services,
C-171/15, EU:C:2016:948
• Dutch authorities indicated that tenderers
affected by exclusion grounds would be
excluded without further assessment, and then
relied on proportionality assessment not to
exclude
• Reverse situation from Pizzo re general law
• ECJ insisted that the contracting authority must
comply strictly with the criteria which it has itself laid
down in the tender documentationSession 2: Recent ECJ case-law 29
2 June 2017
31. Thank you for your attention
Be in touch
a.sanchez-graells@bristol.ac.uk
www.howtocrackanut.com
@asanchezgraells
Session 2: Recent ECJ case-law 31
2 June 2017