Judicial review is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary. Judicial Review plays an important role in Indian Judiciary.
Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism. Sanjana Bharadwaj
This PPT will give you a breif idea on what is Judicial Review, how did it origionate in India with a reference of Judicial Activism and PIL along with examples and case laws.
Judicial review is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary. Judicial Review plays an important role in Indian Judiciary.
Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism. Sanjana Bharadwaj
This PPT will give you a breif idea on what is Judicial Review, how did it origionate in India with a reference of Judicial Activism and PIL along with examples and case laws.
This PowerPoint Presentation on Writs was shared by Mr Jayom Shah and me for conducting the Webinar in association with Lawsikho on April 22, 2020. The presentation is uploaded for the audience asking for a copy of the same.
Writ Jurisdiction and Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in BangladeshAhasan Uddin Bhuiyan
Writ Jurisdiction is the instrument for enforcement of fundamental rights. A writ is only permitted when the defendant has no other adequate remedy, such as an appeal.
For the enforcement of fundamental rights one has to move the Supreme Court or the High Courts directly by invoking Writ Jurisdiction of these courts. But the high cost and complicated procedure involved in litigation, however, makes equal access to jurisdiction in mere slogan in respect of millions of destitute and underprivileged masses stricken by poverty, illiteracy and ignorance. The Supreme Court of India, pioneered the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) thereby throwing upon the portals of courts to the common man.
As a part of my academic activities, I’ve completed this assignment on writ jurisdictions and Public Interest Litigation (PIL) .
Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...sundarsasane
In these SLIDES there are various principles and doctrines of legal interpretation of statutes, law and provisions,this is according to article 245 to 255 and article 13 of the Indian constitution.
Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )sandhyakrish2
Judicial activism is the judicial philosophy that the courts can and should go beyond the words of the constitution or a statute to consider broader societal implications of its decisions. It is sometimes used as an antonym of judicial restraint.
The Supreme Court of India (Hindi: भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय) is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal of India established under Constitution of India, as per which Supreme Court is the highest constitutional court and acts as the guardian of Constitution. India follow the integrated and yet independent judiciary.
Since independence, judiciary has been playing a very active role in dispensing the justice since A K Gopalan vs State of Madras case(1950) followed by Shankari Prasad case, etc. However, judiciary remained submissive till 1960s but its assertiveness started in 1973 when Allahabad High Court rejected the candidature of Indira Gandhi and introduction of PIL by Justice P N Bhagwati further expanded its scope. Subodh Markandeya well known Senior Advocate of Supreme court of India is famous Judicial activist ,who is famous for his notable Public Interest Litigation cases.
Judicial review is the power of the courts to determine the constitutionality
Of legislative acts in a case instituted by aggrieved person.
It is the power of the court to declare a legislative act on the grounds
of Unconstitutionality.
People and entities seek judicial review to obtain remedy from an agency decision if they feel they have been injured.
Judicial review is an example of separation of powers in a modern government system( where judiciary is one of the branches of government).
The Power of Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution.pdflegalpuja22
Introduction:-
Definition:
Judicial review refers to the power of the judiciary to review and invalidate laws or actions of the executive and legislative branches if they are found to be unconstitutional.
Origin:
Borrowed from the United States Constitution, Indian judicial review is enshrined in Article 13 and 32 of the Indian Constitution.
Origin and Evolution:-
Origin:
The concept of judicial review traces back to the Marbury v. Madison case in the United States in 1803.
Evolution in India:
The power of judicial review in India was established through the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala in 1973.
Constitutional Provisions:-
Article 13:
Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights shall be void.
Article 32:
Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part (Part III of the Constitution).
Article 226:
Power of High Courts to issue certain writs.
Landmark Cases:-
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973):
Established the doctrine of basic structure, limiting the amending power of the Parliament.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978):
Expanded the scope of Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) to include procedural fairness.
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994):
Affirmed the supremacy of the Constitution and the power of judicial review over President's Rule.
Advantages of Judicial Review:-
Protection of fundamental rights:
Ensures that fundamental rights are not infringed upon by legislative or executive actions.
Checks and balances:
Acts as a check on the powers of the legislature and executive, preventing abuse of power.
Interpretation of the Constitution:
Judiciary's role in interpreting the Constitution ensures its relevance and adaptability to changing times.
Disadvantages of Judicial Review:-
Judicial activism vs. judicial restraint:
Sometimes, judicial overreach can lead to a perception of activism beyond the judiciary's mandate.
Delay in justice:
Lengthy judicial processes can delay justice, affecting the efficiency of governance.
Interference with legislative intent:
Judicial review may interfere with the policy decisions of the elected representatives.
Criticisms and Controversies:-
Lack of accountability:
Judges are not elected and may not be directly accountable to the public.
Potential for inconsistency:
Different interpretations by different benches may lead to inconsistencies in jurisprudence.
Encroachment on other branches:
Critics argue that judicial review can encroach upon the powers of the legislature and executive.
Conclusion:-
The power of judicial review in the Indian Constitution serves as a cornerstone of democracy, ensuring the protection of fundamental rights and upholding the supremacy of the Constitution.
While it has its advantages in safeguarding rights and maintaining checks and balances, criticisms highlight the need for a balanced approach and accountability within the judiciary.
This PowerPoint Presentation on Writs was shared by Mr Jayom Shah and me for conducting the Webinar in association with Lawsikho on April 22, 2020. The presentation is uploaded for the audience asking for a copy of the same.
Writ Jurisdiction and Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in BangladeshAhasan Uddin Bhuiyan
Writ Jurisdiction is the instrument for enforcement of fundamental rights. A writ is only permitted when the defendant has no other adequate remedy, such as an appeal.
For the enforcement of fundamental rights one has to move the Supreme Court or the High Courts directly by invoking Writ Jurisdiction of these courts. But the high cost and complicated procedure involved in litigation, however, makes equal access to jurisdiction in mere slogan in respect of millions of destitute and underprivileged masses stricken by poverty, illiteracy and ignorance. The Supreme Court of India, pioneered the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) thereby throwing upon the portals of courts to the common man.
As a part of my academic activities, I’ve completed this assignment on writ jurisdictions and Public Interest Litigation (PIL) .
Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...sundarsasane
In these SLIDES there are various principles and doctrines of legal interpretation of statutes, law and provisions,this is according to article 245 to 255 and article 13 of the Indian constitution.
Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )sandhyakrish2
Judicial activism is the judicial philosophy that the courts can and should go beyond the words of the constitution or a statute to consider broader societal implications of its decisions. It is sometimes used as an antonym of judicial restraint.
The Supreme Court of India (Hindi: भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय) is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal of India established under Constitution of India, as per which Supreme Court is the highest constitutional court and acts as the guardian of Constitution. India follow the integrated and yet independent judiciary.
Since independence, judiciary has been playing a very active role in dispensing the justice since A K Gopalan vs State of Madras case(1950) followed by Shankari Prasad case, etc. However, judiciary remained submissive till 1960s but its assertiveness started in 1973 when Allahabad High Court rejected the candidature of Indira Gandhi and introduction of PIL by Justice P N Bhagwati further expanded its scope. Subodh Markandeya well known Senior Advocate of Supreme court of India is famous Judicial activist ,who is famous for his notable Public Interest Litigation cases.
Judicial review is the power of the courts to determine the constitutionality
Of legislative acts in a case instituted by aggrieved person.
It is the power of the court to declare a legislative act on the grounds
of Unconstitutionality.
People and entities seek judicial review to obtain remedy from an agency decision if they feel they have been injured.
Judicial review is an example of separation of powers in a modern government system( where judiciary is one of the branches of government).
The Power of Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution.pdflegalpuja22
Introduction:-
Definition:
Judicial review refers to the power of the judiciary to review and invalidate laws or actions of the executive and legislative branches if they are found to be unconstitutional.
Origin:
Borrowed from the United States Constitution, Indian judicial review is enshrined in Article 13 and 32 of the Indian Constitution.
Origin and Evolution:-
Origin:
The concept of judicial review traces back to the Marbury v. Madison case in the United States in 1803.
Evolution in India:
The power of judicial review in India was established through the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala in 1973.
Constitutional Provisions:-
Article 13:
Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights shall be void.
Article 32:
Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part (Part III of the Constitution).
Article 226:
Power of High Courts to issue certain writs.
Landmark Cases:-
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973):
Established the doctrine of basic structure, limiting the amending power of the Parliament.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978):
Expanded the scope of Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) to include procedural fairness.
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994):
Affirmed the supremacy of the Constitution and the power of judicial review over President's Rule.
Advantages of Judicial Review:-
Protection of fundamental rights:
Ensures that fundamental rights are not infringed upon by legislative or executive actions.
Checks and balances:
Acts as a check on the powers of the legislature and executive, preventing abuse of power.
Interpretation of the Constitution:
Judiciary's role in interpreting the Constitution ensures its relevance and adaptability to changing times.
Disadvantages of Judicial Review:-
Judicial activism vs. judicial restraint:
Sometimes, judicial overreach can lead to a perception of activism beyond the judiciary's mandate.
Delay in justice:
Lengthy judicial processes can delay justice, affecting the efficiency of governance.
Interference with legislative intent:
Judicial review may interfere with the policy decisions of the elected representatives.
Criticisms and Controversies:-
Lack of accountability:
Judges are not elected and may not be directly accountable to the public.
Potential for inconsistency:
Different interpretations by different benches may lead to inconsistencies in jurisprudence.
Encroachment on other branches:
Critics argue that judicial review can encroach upon the powers of the legislature and executive.
Conclusion:-
The power of judicial review in the Indian Constitution serves as a cornerstone of democracy, ensuring the protection of fundamental rights and upholding the supremacy of the Constitution.
While it has its advantages in safeguarding rights and maintaining checks and balances, criticisms highlight the need for a balanced approach and accountability within the judiciary.
This presentation is an attempt to explain the colourable legislation in a simple language with the limitations on it and supported by the landmark cases delivered by the apex court.
Judicial review of orders by president and governor vaibhav goyalVaibhav Goyal
Encyclopaedia defines “Judicial Review” as the power of the courts of a country to examine the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative arms of the government and to determine whether such actions are consistent with the constitution. Actions judged inconsistent are declared unconstitutional and, therefore, null and void. Constitutional judicial review is usually considered to have begun with the assertion by John Marshall, fourth chief justice of the United States (1801–35), in Marbury v. Madison (1803) that the Supreme Court of the United States had the power to invalidate legislation enacted by Congress. Constitution of India itself provides some discretionary powers to the Governors. Sometime Governors’ do not exercise their discretionary powers judiciously. Here the role of the judiciary starts and many times judiciary has provided valuable guidelines for the Governors.
The slides relate to Part - III of the Indian Constitution i.e. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. It elaborates on the concept and meaning of State under the constitution. Useful for Law students and Professionals.
Homosexuality is still considered a ‘taboo’ in India. India today is one of the fastest developing nations with impressive economic growth rates. But is the growth rate enough to imply that India is a developing nation. A nation is also characterized by the way it treats its people. With respect to this prerogative, the way India looks at homosexuality is certainly not the way to look at it. Homosexuality is considered as a disease by most sections of the society and there are only a few sections of the society who welcome homosexuality.
E-CONTRACT is an electronic form of contract, where two or more parties comes into a contract with a electronic medium.
E-CONTRACT is friendly to the environment, because no paper is use in this form of contract.
In this research paper I want to throw some light on the advantages of the E-CONTRACT to the society and the environment.
PRESENTATION ON A VERY RARELY DISCUSES TOPIC THAT IS CYBER WAR. AN IMPORTANT PART OF INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM WHERE NO LAW CONCERNED HAS BEEN DEVELOPED SO FAR.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
2. INTRODUCTION
Judicial review is the power given to the courts to
determine the constitutionality of actions taken by the
different branches of the government such as
legislature and executive
The United States Supreme Court in case of Marbury
v. Madison 5 US (1 Cr.) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803)
propounded the concept of Judicial review,.In India,
the Judiciary acts as the silent protector of the
constitutional valuesand also asserts its positions as
the watchdog of the constitution.
3. DEFINITION
According to Black's Law Dictionary, judicial
review is "a philosophy of judicial decisionmaking
whereby judges allow their personal views about
public policy, among other factors, to guide their
decisions, usually with the suggestion that adherents
of this philosophy tend to find constitutional
violations and are willing to ignore precedent.
Section 114, CPC, 1908 defines Judicial Review as a
Means to look again main object of granting a
review of judgment in reconsideration of the same
matter by the same judge under certain conditions.
4. JUDICIAL REVIEW IS THE POWER
OF THE JUDICIARY BY WHICH:
(i) The court reviews the laws and rules of
the legislature and executive in cases that
come before them; in litigation cases.
(ii) The court determines the constitutional
validity of the laws and rules of the
government; and
(iii) The court rejects that law or any of its
part which is found to be unconstitutional or
against the Constitution
5. POWER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF
LEGISLATION
The power of judicial review of legislation is given to the
judiciary both by the political theory and text of the
constitution. There are several specific provisions in the
Indian constitution, judicial review of legislation such as
Articles 13, 32, 131-136, 143, 226, 145, 246, 251, 254 and
372.
Article 13 in fact provides for the judicial review of all
legislations in india, past as well as future. This power has
been conferred on the High courts and the Supreme court
of India which can declare a law unconstitutional if it is
inconsistent with any of the provisions of part 3rd of the
constitution.
6. JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIAN
CONSTITUTION AND ITS APPLICATION
Judicial review is an extraordinary power given to the
superior courts to judicially review any decision and also
for assessing the exercise of power of public authorities,
whether they are constitutional, quasi-judicial or
governmental. Judicial Review of legislative acts
indicates review of legislative actions to check its
constitutional validity or its correctness
Supreme Court has pointed out that judicial review has
expressly been provided in our constitution under Article
13 of the Indian Constitution State of Madras v. Row, AIR
1952 SC 196 (199) according to which it is a duty to
determine the constitutionality of the legislation when
that is challenged on the ground of contravention of the
fundamental rights. DD Basu, Constitution of India, Vol-
1, pg. no. 72
7. IN INDIA, JUDICIAL REVIEW
BROADLY COVERS THREE
ASPECTS;
(1) Judicial review of legislative action
(2) Judicial review for judicial decision,
and
(3) Judicial review of administrative action
8. JUDICIAL REVIEW CASE LAWS
Justice Bhagwati, in Sampath Kumar v. Union
of India AIR 1987 SC 386 held that, “Judicial
Review is essential feature of the constitution
and no law passed by Parliament in exercise of
its constituent power can abrogate it or take it
away. If the power of judicial review is
abrogated or taken away the constitution will
cease to be what it is”
9. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India AIR 1978
SC 597 , it was held that, “Judicial review
acquired the same or even wider dimensions as in
the United States. Now ‘procedure established by
law ‘in Article 21 does not mean any procedure lay
down by the legislature but it means a fair, just and
reasonable procedure.”
10. ChampakamDorairajan v. State of Madras AIR
1951 SC
226 , it was held that “The Government of Madras reserved
seats in state medical and engineering colleges for different
communities in certain proportions on the basis of religion,
race and caste. This was challenged as unconstitutional. The
government defended its order on the grounds of Article 46
of the Constitution, which permits the state to promote with
special care the educational and economic interests of the
weaker sections of the people and in particular scheduled
castes and scheduled tribes to secure social justice. But the
Supreme Court struck down the order as it was violative of
Right to equality guaranteed under article 15(1) and observed
that directive principles can't override the guaranteed
fundamental rights. As a result, the Parliament brought the
Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951 to Article 15 and
inserted clause (4)”
11. I. C. GolakNath v. State of PunjabAIR 1967 SC 1643
.
the petitioner, landowners deprived of their surplus
landholdings under state land reform legislation challenged
the validity of first, fourth, and seventeenth amendments.
The SC constituted an eleven judge bench to examine that
whether a constitutional amendment can be passed which
abridges the fundamental right? The court overruled the
decision of ShankariPrasadv Union of India26 and said that
constitutional amendment comes under the definition of
law under Art. 13(2) hence cannot abridge the fundamental
rights. The SC showed courage but it was of no use as
legislature passed the 24th Constitutional Amendment act
which among the other things included clause 4 in Art 13
stating that this Article expressly exclude constitutional
amendments.
12. The Supreme Court in Kartar Singh v. State of
Punjab (1994) 3 SCC 569 (738) , explained
Judicial review as it is not only concerned with
the merits of the decision but also of the decision-
making process. It intends to protect the
individual against the misuse or abuse of the
power by a wide range of authorities. Judicial
review is a protection to the individual and not at
weapon
13. CONCLUSION
The concept of Separation of power so we cannot assume
the power of judicial review in full extended form. If the courts
presume full and arbitrary power of judicial review it will lead
to the poor performance of work by all the organs of
government. So to keep all the functions work properly each
has to work in its provided sphere. In India, we have the
concept of judicial review embedded in the basic structure of
the constitution.
It helps the courts to keep a check and balance upon the
other two organs of government so that they don’t misuse
their power and work in accordance with the constitution.
Finally, we have developed the concept of judicial review and
it has become the part of basic structure in case of Minerva
Mills V. Union of India. So, at last, it is correct to say that
judicial review has grown to safeguard the individual right, to
stop the use of arbitrary power and to prevent the miscarriage
of justice.