QUo Warranto 1 Dec 2022.docx

Quo Warranto 1 Dec 2022
Department of Defense
In re Margaret, Austin, Robert Bozgoz) Case No. 20- 5149
Lance Fulgium, Lee Smith, Luanne )
Simmons, Bradly Everette Bolden )
Jimmy & James Ryan, and Shaunel Burt
Supplement for (1) Main DC District Court/ Military
Tribunal claim & (2) Petition for Writ of
Mandamus/Writ of Quo Warranto
3771 EMERGENCIES
I. The Relief Sought
Comes Now, the Petitioner(s), Margaret Sue Bozgoz and ADA Clients, Robert Bozgoz,
Austin Bozgoz, Lance Fulgium, Lee Smith, Luanne Simmons, James “Jimmy” Ryan, James
Ryan and Bradley Everette Bolden and Shanuel Burt are living breathing human beings. We are
not corporations and or lost at sea. Therefore we wont be playing admirative trickery games in
violation of TITLE II which states nobody gets immunity for playing corporation games against
GOD’s Natural Law.
We, Americans/Indigenous People demand a supplement to the Writ of Mandamus & Quo
Warranto ordering these privately owned corporations [under Title II and III, Section 504, of the
Americans with Disabilities Act as amended, 42 USC 12101 et seq, Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (42-USC 2000e, Marbury v Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 1803, Article VI, Paragraph
2 of the US Constitution], 18 U.S. Code § 3771. Crime victims’ rights, 2012 Magnitsky Act,
CHARTER OF THE FOREST and Department of Defense Law of War Manuel, United States
Sanctions Human Rights Abusers and Corrupt Actors Across the Globe that:

1. This supplement (e.g., Main court case and Writs) be added to the records due to
Corporate & Contract law and more Treason, Fraud, Waste, Abuse and
Constitutional/Human Rights, Illegal Experiments and etc., Violations.
2. The event that generated this 3771 Emergency Supplement involves the ANNE
ARUNDEL County Sheriff’s Department, Sergeant Eric Crane #72665, 8 Church
Circle Court House, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 ignoring the ADA Act, Judge
Margaret Taylor, The State of Florida, the Hillsborough Sheriff’s Department,
Judge Jeffrey Rich, Savannah, Cindy Stuart, and the WOMEN’s Correction
Facility in Washington State and violating 18 USC 1341 on the record. See social
media and attached affidavits: https://www.bitchute.com/video/CcXCPj06v4h9/ and
attached Declaration.
3. Request that the Anne Arundel County Sheriff’s Department and the State of Florida,
Inc., be dissolved for the following reasons: (1) Failure to train their employees on how
to honor their company/corporate contract and charter
i. Violating the ADA interference Act
ii. Violating 18 USC 241 on two separate occasions (e.g.. 2019 and 2022)
iii. Violating GOD Given Natural Human Rights during war as 911 was an
inside job.
iv. Treason
4. Hold Sgt Eric Crane, Anne Arundel County Sheriff’s Department and the State of
Florida, and Washington Inc accountable for the following GOD GIVEN NATURAL
RIGHTS and CHARTER OF THE FOREST VIOLATIONS:
a. 18 USC 1983 KKK Act

b. 18 USC 241
c. 18 USC 242
d. 42 USC 1985
e. 42 USC 1986
5. Hold SGT Eric Crane accountable for violating the above-mentioned GOD GIVEN
RIGHTS, his oath and for threatening Margaret Sue Bozgoz, ADA Advocate in violation
of the ADA Interference Act.
6. We specifically Request:
a. Relief by all defendants (see also attached Declaration for additional Defendants)
in their official and personal capacity as per fraudulent inducement, 18 USC 241,
18 USC 242, 42 USC 1983 KKK Act, 42 USC 1985, 42 USC 1986 and the ADA
Interference Act, 42 USC 12203 Prohibition against retaliation and coercion
i. Retaliation
ii. No person shall discriminate against any individual because such
individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter
or because such individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or
participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing
under this chapter.
iii. Interference, coercion, or intimidation
iv. It shall be unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any
individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her
having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or
encouraged any other individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right
granted or protected by this chapter.
v. (c) Remedies and procedures
The remedies and procedures available under sections 12117, 12133, and
12188 of this title shall be available to aggrieved persons for violations of
subsections (a) and (b), with respect to subchapter I, subchapter II and
subchapter III, respectively.

7. All documents be added to our: (1) main case as a supplement, (2) Quo Warranto and (3)
military tribunal docket as a matter of law and under Titles II, III and Title VI of the
ADA, 1983 and 1964 Civil Rights Act (42 USC 2000e), 504, 503, 18 USC 3771) the
2012 Magnitsky Act, Charter of the Forest and Military Defense Manual Chapter 11 as
our case is an 3771 Emergency as the system is broken by rogue criminals/corporations.
We are suing these individual and corporations in their individual and official capacity
along with their corporation for violating their charter and crimes against the elderly and
ADA Advocate retaliation. See: https://www.bitchute.com/video/L0pTMXUGTdQ7/
8. Timeline regarding the Anne Arundel Sheriff’s Department and Sgt Eric Crane.
On 29 November 2022 at approximately 0800, I contacted the Fort Meade Police Office and
informed them that I was being harassed “again” by the Anne Arundel County Sheriff’s
Department and wanted to capture my complaint “ON THE RECORD”,
From 2018 to date my family and I have been retaliated against the Deep State. As ADA
Advocate, we are familiar with the Justice system and how it works.
BLUF: The justice system is corrupt, and everyone is involved including the Sheriff’s
Department. I am a whistleblower and ADA Advocate. To interfere with my duty as an ADA
Advocate not only violates my rights to do my duty to protect my ADA Clients, but it also
violates their rights. (Exhibit 1, ADA Interference and etc.)
In 2019, the Sheriff’s department arrived at home and gave me a fake summons to attend fake
Kangaroo Court in Montgomery County.
We learned very quickly that the Justice system is corrupt starting from EEOC process in DC at
the VA to the Supreme court. The Courts are privately owned (see Clearfield Doctrine) and there
is no rule of law. Why? Because the judges are not proving subject matter jurisdiction. We have
played the fake Kangaroo Court aka administrative trickery games starting at the EEOC level to
MD States Court, De novo, Criminal Court to the Supreme court (Exhibit 2, Quo Warranto).
Reference the Sheriff’s Department and Fort Meade:
In 2019, Robert and I made a complaint to the Fort Meade Police Office while we were
being set up by the Deep State (Attorney’s in building 810, DOJ, Fred Haynes, VA’s Security
Director and Judge Amy B. Jackson) and their pawn, GS14 Voncelle James.
On 6 Jun 2019, we knew we were going to receive a fake peace from the Sheriff’s Department
because Voncelle James announced their plan to set us up while she received her summons from
our Process Server, Lance Fulgium.

On 7 June 2019 the Sheriff’s Department delivered a fake summons to our house. The fake
peace order was used to illegally retaliate against us by the system. We were forced to in and out
of fake Kangaroo Court (e.g., State, Reconsideration, De Novo and Criminal). When the
Sheriff’s department gave us the summons on 7 Jun 2019, Robert and I informed him that the
summons was in retaliation and fake.
Ref: SGT ERIC CRANE’s TIMELINE
On or about 26 Nov 2022, the Anne Arundel County Sheriff’s department, Eric Crane #7265.
Office number: (410) 222- 1490, Cell Number (443) 758-0798 and Dispatch # (410) 222-1570
left his business card in my door at Fort Meade as I was not home.
27 Nov 2022, I arrived home from vacation. I contacted (1) the Anne Arundel County Office and
(2) SGT Eric Crane on the record. I told them that we were remarkably familiar about the corrupt
justice system as we have gone through it as ADA advocates and victims or 18 USC 1341
violations. I made this noticeably clear to SGT ERIC CRANE that before he violated my rights
by delivering a fake summons on a military installation, he needed to do his homework as I am
not up to anyone violating my GOD GIVEN HUMAN RIGHTS. I have been in out of fake
Kangaroo Court with MD and all my ADA Advocate as we have never seen justice.
Fake Kangaroo Court only causes legal abuse syndrome which is a willful crime caused by the
justice system.
I also reminded SGT ERIC CRANE Anne Arundel County Sheriff’s department that (1) I tape
record everything as my life has been threaten for being a whistleblower. I also reminded SGT
CRANE (2) to violate my GOD GIVEN right to protect my ADA CLIENTS as an ADA
Advocate is a felony. I was truly clear.
On 28 Nov 2022, SGT Eric Crane called me at approximately 0900. He informed me that he had
a cease-and-desist order from a Judge. When I asked SGT ERIC CRANE the name of the
judge, he refused to tell me. My guess it was Judge Margaret Taylor as she refused to recuse
herself as a matter of law.
He said he did not discuss “that” business over the phone. Sgt Crane then asked to coordinate a
time for him to deliver this fake cease and desists order. I told Sgt Crane that I wanted to get the
FORT MEADE Post Commander and the Unified Commander involved when he violated my
rights. The Post Commander should know who is coming onto his post violating GOD GIVEN
CONSTITUTIAL RIGHTS as he took an oath to defend the constitution against traitors like
SGT ERIC CRANE.
I informed SGT ERIC CRANE THAT I HAVE A HIGH VISIBLE CASE AGAINST several
treasonous defendants. Told him that I was not up to playing the fake Kangaroo Court anymore.
SGT ERIC CRANE IGNORED what I told him. He simply was not interested in find the facts.
He obviously did not care about the ADA Interference Act violation and how it is FELONY to
violate my duty to protect the disabled.

SGT ERIC CRANE then asked me to coordinate a time where he could deliver the cease-and-
desist order. I told Sgt Crane that I needed to coordinate and report his illegal action to the FORT
MEADE POST COMMANDER, the UNIFED COMMANDER AND THE SECRETARY OF
DEFENSE. I told SGT ERIC CRANE THAT I AM A WHISTLEBLOWER AND ADA
ADVOCATE to violate my rights to protect is an 18 USC 1341 violation. SGT Eric Crane was
not interested in what I had to say, nor did he care.
What one does not care to realize is when anyone interferes with my ADA Advocate duties to
protect the disabled, they put my client’s life in danger, hence the reason it is crime to violate my
ADA duties.
When I told Sgt Eric Crane that I wanted the FORT MEADE military commanders involved [as
they need to see what is happening on their installation by traitors]. SGT Eric Crane informed me
that
(1) He does not get involved in post commanders and
(2) He will try one more time to deliver the cease-and-desist summons. “That” statement
of SGT CRANEs was interesting to me because SGT Eric Crane training should tell him
that when he enters a military installation to violate a GOD GIVEN/CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT the entire miliary is involved as the entire military (like Sgt Eric Crane) took an
oath to defend the constitution. To dishonor an oath is a felony.
Furthermore, SGT ERIC CRANE is a sergeant. He should know that when he violates my GOD
GIVEN RIGHT TO PROTECT the disabled, he is not only putting their life in danger he setting
himself up for a liability lawsuit under the 1990 ADA Act: TITLES II and III which means
NOBODY gets immunity, 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242, 42 USC 1983 KKK, 42 USC 1985, 42
USC 1986 and 18 USC 1341
Next SGT Eric Crane then asked me, this, “If you are retired, how do you get to live on post”. I
told SGT ERIC CRANE that was none of his business. I told him we only needed focus on how
he was going to violate my rights. I also reminded him that my oath to protect does not go away
when I retire. I was hot as I could not see straight.
SGT Eric Crane then told me this, “I am going to come out there [on the military installation to
violate my rights], one last time. If you are not there, we are going to get a body attachment for
you. SGT CRANE also said, “I am sure you are familiar with a body attachment, right?”
What we do is come [on post] and put a body attachment on you and take you into custody.
When he threatens me, I could not see straight as he obviously NOT TRAINED ON HUMAN
RIGHTS VIOLALTIONS IS A CRIME. I told SGT ERIC CRANE that I was going to (1) report
his crimes to the Post Commander, (2) Unified Commanders and (3) Secretary Defense before I
place him and his corporation on my Quo Warranto and as a Defendant in our main case.
It is people like SGT ERIC CRANE that ensure the justice system stays corrupt as hell. There is
no excuse why a Sheriff should be driving on an military installation to violate GOD GIVEN
RIGHTS. see: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/WTXWnbl8YhXG/

BLUF: SGT Eric Crane took an oath to enforce the law/constitution not violate the constitution
boldly.
The Military took an oath to defend the constitution and to protect Americans, Veterans and etc.
at no time should they allow the Sheriff’s department on an military installation especially when
we know the Sheriff’s Department is involved in injustice. It is no secret that the justice system
in every state is corrupt. It is also no secret that the justice system uses the Sheriff’s Department
to do their dirty work by violating rights.
When Corporations (e.g., judges, courts, sheriff’s department0 go rogue the military must do
their job and shut them down. Why? To know these reoccurring crimes by Sheriff’s
Departments is a violate your oath of office which is a FELONY.
Ref: The Organization who paid SGT ERIC Crane to deliver the fake cease and desist
order.
Although SGT ERIC Crane refused to discuss his client aka the Judge who convinced him to
violate the ADA interference Act, my guess is that there are four defendants:
(1) The Hillsborough Sheriff’s Department, FL. They violated my ADA Clients rights by
entering Bradley’s house without a warrant. The Sheriff’s Department then covered their
crimes up by (1) arresting Bradley, (2) refuse medical treatment, (3) lied under oath, (4)
Locked Bradley out of his house, (5) stole Bradley household items, (6) released Bradley at
10 pm after three days in jail with nothing.
(2) Judge Margaret Taylor, 13 Circuit, Tampa FL. Judge Margaret Taylor violated Bradley’s
rights by not showing Subject Matter Jurisdiction on 31 Oct 2022 during fake Kangaroo
Court as she allowed the prosecutor to illegally give Bradley 2 options (a) Pay their private
corporation/ court $3,000 Go to their mental facility for 6 weeks. Bradley is not mentally ill.
They are.
(3) Judge Margaret Taylor made matters worse by ordering Bradley to appear in fake criminal
court on 29 November 2022 without a jury and without my help as per his ADA request. I at
once notified the Department of Defense Unified Command and the Secretary of Defense
and filed a QUO WARRANTO and asked for a military trial for TREASON.
(4) Also on 29 November 2022, Judge Margaret Taylor recused herself after the fake Kangaroo
hearing and ordered Bradley to return to fake Kangaroo Court to deal with Judge Jeffrey
Rich (See Attached Declaration and social media video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/51B02Ao7Z1aG/ as everything is captured so Americans to
understand their crimes against humanity.
(5) Again, Americans will never get justice in a rogue corrupt PEDO corporation who ignores
the rule of law.

(6) The VA in Tampa Court in Florida for allowing the (13 Circuit Court) clerk to issue
Bradley a fake Summons to appear in VA Criminal court on 4 November. When Brandley
appeared in court, the VA Attorney dismissed Bradley case vs Judge Williams. The VA
attorney also lied on the record to Bradley. The VA Attorney said the court hearing was not a
hearing but a FAIR/EVENT. This was another trick to make Bradly look bad on the record
because if you review the docket, it shows badly did not show for the fake Kangaroo Court
which the VA Attorney dismissed vs the Judge.
(7) Washington State Prison for experimenting illegally on 60 female inmates to include
my ADA Client, Shaunel Burt. The Washington State Women’s Correction facility
experimented on Shaunel [and the other inmates] using the COVID vaccine. The Covid
vaccine changed the structure of these prisoner’s body type making them magnetic. We have
sent witnesses into the prison to confirm this. When I confronted the Doctor on or about 10
November, medical records were lost. Also the Doctors and nurses who are hiding the illegal
experiment at Washington State are:
a. Dr. Sanchez,
b. Julie L,
c. Nancy L.
d. MRI Lab
The other 10 women who are willing to testify due to the magnetic/illegal experiment
with the COVID Vaccine are:
a. Filomena Washington
b. Tammy Foust
c. Jennifer Vanderdrink
d. Raven Cutler
e. Kayla RIchel
f. Esmeralda Martian
g. Ashley Barry
h. Laura Hickey
i. Vanessa Roozen
j. Lisa Kanamu
k. The other 50 females are afraid to whistle blow of the Washington State
Correction facility due to retaliation
9. As you can see, the system is corrupt and rogue without ADA Advocates to protect
Americans, traitors are left to harm, injure and kill
10. Timeline regarding ADA Client, Shaunel Burt

I, Margaret Sue Bozgoz, an American/Hawaiian and ADA Advocate for Shaunel
Burt, #856574 MSU B 244. Shaunel Burt was a victim of sex trafficking. She
unfortunately is incarcerated at the Washington, State Correction Center for
Women 961 Bujacich Road N.W., Gig Harbor, WA 98332.
Shaunel Burt is also my cousin. She and I are NOT a corporation, and we do not
agree to play the rich man’s administrative trickery game. We do not consent to any of
the United States Inc’s de facto government’s nonsense and tricks. My family and I have
been retaliated against by the United States Inc Corporation and its associations for being
whistleblower as indicated by our current case which is not a stand-alone case as I am an
ADA Advocate. I fight for the rights for the disabled, elderly, service-disabled veterans
and children. To interfere with my job to protect is a felony.
As it pertains to Shaunel Burt, she has been abused/experimented on as the record shows
see: https://www.bitchute.com/video/0fw6DPJRatuD/ (MRI TECHNICIAN STATING
they would not allow Shaunel Burt to take an MRI due to the danger)
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/WTXWnbl8YhXG/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tvE7BMFR1FFo/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VS38NfqRFfHR/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/yqWY1ZDTzaXE/
She is protected under Titles II and Title III of the ADA Act. Title II states nobody gets
immunity (See 42 USC 1986) and Title III states any man-made common law [United
States Inc] can be changed when it violates GOD’s Natural law.
I am the Main Plaintiff in our real time RICO, 1983 KKK, NIST, Crimes etc. case against
the United States Inc which I will add Shanuel Burt as an intervenor because her life is in
danger.
My main concern now is on November 9, 2022, I became Shaunel’s ADA Advocate
because the Washington Correction Center for Women was experimenting on Shaunel
and approximately 60 other female inmates. We were told by the MRI Technician that
Shanuel became magnetic after taking the COVID Vaccine (See attached videos).
More specifically Shaunel and approximately 60 other inmates became magnetic after
taking the COVID.
After Shaunel Burt was examined by the clinic with 3 other inmates, the Doctor at the
Clinic ordered Shaunel to take an MRI knowing it was dangerous. See:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0fw6DPJRatuD/

On or about 19 November 2022, Shaunel Burt informed her mother and I that the
Women’s correction facility directed her medical care provider to coordinate another
MRI with a different facility that would conduct the MRI. Shaunel and her mother said
they were in fear for her life as they never gave consent to experiment on her. Her mother
also complained about the prison experimenting on Shaunel in the past by giving her
medication that made her body go into seizure to the point her mother demanded to know
what they were doing. Once her mother complained, the seizures stopped.
Furthermore, this is not the first time she had been experimented on at that facility (See
attached pictures and attached bitchute videos which have gone viral.
According to Shanuel, 9 other medical personnel took pictures and examined her with
three other inmates. They all demonstrated how they were magnetic. See attached
bitchute videos. Later it was overheard that the clinic should not have allowed three
women with their [bars on] be inspected at the same time in the same location.
Bottom line: I think every military person knows that experimenting on human beings
[inmates] without consent is a war crime/crime against humanity. These acts not only
violate universal law, but it also violates the following: 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242, 42
USC 1983 KKK Act, 42 USC 1985 and 42 USC 1986. See:
As per the Department of Defense Manual, when these corporations [foreign] go rogue,
the military must step in and investigate as there are over 60 AMERICAN women [with a
soul] who are being experimented on in WA STATE without consent.
Below please find 9 of 60 women who agreed to testify about their current magnetic
status:
1. Filomena Washington
2. Tammy Foust
3. Jennifer Vanderdrink
4. Raven Cutler
5. Kayla Richel
6. Esmeralda Martian
7. Ashley Barry
8. Laura Hickey
9. Vanessa Roozen
10. Lisa Kanamu
NOTE: Approximately 50 inmates who are magnetic are afraid to come forward due to
retaliation. In addition, during the covid testing, the females who became ill were

removed and separated from those who were affected. The Correction facility’s remedy
was giving the injured women “COUGH DROPS”.
On or about 20 November 2022, I contacted the Washington Women’s Facility Health
Clinic and informed the doctor [on the record] that I was Shaunel Burt’s ADA Advocate,
and she is protected under the 1990 ADA Act [and the Defense Manual chapter 11].
I specifically told them that I needed to be in all Shanuel’s medical appointment as per
1990 ADA Act. I told the clinic that I was concerned for Shaunel’s [and 60 other
inmates] safety.
I also informed the doctor at the Women’s Correction facility that I was going to request
a DOD investigation for illegally experimenting on Shaunel. I told the doctor that my
phone call was an emergency, and I wanted a returned phone call. However, I learned
later that the correction facility told Shaunel [to tell me] to call their legal representative
(Ms. Johnson) which I did.
As of date, this professional establishment has not returned my phone call and thinks
experimenting on my cousin without her consent is NOT an emergency.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0fw6DPJRatuD/ (MRI TECHNICIAN STATING they
would not allow Shaunel Burt to take an MRI due to the danger)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tvE7BMFR1FFo/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VS38NfqRFfHR/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/yqWY1ZDTzaXE
On 21 November 2022, Shaunel contacted her mother and said the clinic ordered her to
appear in person at the clinic. Shaunel called her mother as she fears if they force her to
take a MRI, and she refused, the correction facility will deny her medical benefits or
retaliate.
Shaunel went to the clinic [without me] which is an ADA violation. The clinic had
Shaunel review her updated medical records. Shaunel found her medical records ref: her
“MEDATALIC” examination, pictures etc. were missing. Hiding medical records after I
contact this facility is an 18 USC 1506 violation as well.
We know hiding Shaunels records is a 18 USC 1506 violation because the initial MRI
technician informed us on or about 9 November 2022 [on the record] that Shaunel’s life
was in danger had she gone through with the MRI Scan see:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Xk2DvutrhuzS/

On or about 26 November 2022, we sent a relative to confirm Shaunel’s statement ref:
being magnetic. Shaunel demonstrated how her keys stuck to her body.
Our concern is the Women’s Washington Correction Facility is hiding the facts and the
women in the correction facility are in danger.
In addition, this correction facility allows men [who think they are women with dicks],
stay in this facility according to my source. This crime also needs to be investigated
because women are being raped in that facility. That woman who was raped was allowed
to leave the correction facility early.
Again, I am Shaunel’s ADA Advocate and cousin, I am concerned for Shaunel’s [and the
other AMERICANS] safety, health, welfare and life as I am aware of the corruption that
goes on in the United States Inc., Corporations, courts jails and prisons.
Therefore, I noted on the main claim and attached affidavit that I will do the following to
protect Shaunel:
(1) Request the Department of Defense (DOD) investigate the Washington State
Correction Facility INC., for illegal experiments on Shaunel and approximately
60 other inmates BEFORE someone dies.
(2) Request DOD protection for Shaunel and the other inmates by removing them
during the investigation as we are looking at war crimes against humanity.
(3) Dissolve the Washington Correction Center for violating their charter and for
crimes against humanity.
(4) Request DOD request my Updated QUO WARRANTO against the Washington
State Correction INC facility under TITLES II and TITLE III of the ADA ACT
(See attached)
(5) : Request DOD add My ADA CLIENT, Shaunel Burt as an Intervenor to our
current Case under TITLES II and TITLE III of the ADA ACT as Shaunel Burt
will be suing the Washington Correction Center and everyone involved in her
illegal COVID EXPERIMENTS/TESTING as Defendant. Specifically, we will
sue everyone at the Washington States Correction Facility who is involved [and
hiding the facts]. We will sue all of them in their individua and official capacity as
this is a war crime and Shaunel will be made whole as per the 1983 KKK Act, 18
USC 241, 18 USC 242, 42 USC 1983 KKK ACT, 42 USC 1985 an d42 USC
1986 etc. Again, and for the record: will sue them under the 1990 ADA Act Title
I and Title III which means nobody gets immunity from this crime and man-made

laws that conflicts GOD’s natural law can be changed so my cousin, Shaunel can
live in this world without being violated by criminal corporations.
(6) I will also cc Ben Fulford and the international criminal court (ICC) because this
nonsense is a war crime/crime against humanity. The reason why these prisons,
courts and corrupt ass corporations think they are above the law and allowed to
experiment on inmates is because NOBODY is holding them accountable for their
crimes. The reason why this facility thinks it is okay to violate their charter,
ethics code, law of war manual etc., is because they have no regards for life, and
they think they are the salt of the earth.
ADA INTERFERENCE AND DENYING ADA RIGHTS are reoccurring crimes against ADA
Advocates and all Americans, the Elderly and Services Disabled Veterans WILLFULLY and if
the system does not stop, they will be held accountable for a preventable health issue see:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/sGnzuoWXnMz4/
a. Timeline regarding Bradley Bolden.
i. 2014 – 2022 – Bradley Everette Bolden resided at the Oasis at Brandon
Apartment. He requested ADA Reasonable Accommodations ref: writing,
reading and memory (Exhibit 3)
ii. On or about November 10, 2021, Bradley was called to the Oasis at
Brandon Apartment to renew his lease with a quote of $1,813.00 verbally
via email (Exhibit 3).
iii. On November 12, 2021, Bradley signed his lease for 2022 (Exhibit 3)
iv. On or about 1 May 2022, Bradley was told that the new staff was directed
by Savanah to violate the 1990 ADA Act and NOT help Bradly, “Because
people could say them are being charged too much” (Exhibit 3).
v. On 1 February 2022, Bradley received a rental invoice for $2,081.00. He
immediately went to the lease office and spoke with Kim who told him

that the increase was strange (Exhibit 3). Although Bradley knew he was
being overcharged he paid and later contested the fraud (Exhibit 3).
vi. On 1 June 2022, Bradley contacted the corporate office and informed them
that he would pay the correct amount ($1,813) and wanted his over
payment to be credited.
vii. On or about 4 Aug 2022, Bradley Bolden requested a court hearing against
the OASIS AT BRANDON LLC, Case Number: 22-CC-54766 dated 4
Aug 2022, Judge assigned COSTELLO (Exhibit 4, Request for hearing)
viii. The Hillsborough Sheriff’s Department committed the following
crimes:
1. Entered Bradley’s house without a court order,
2. Bragged about not having a court order on camera see:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SnxYDFvfr1Re/
3. Locked Bradley out of his apartment [on camera] when Bradly left
them in his apartment to go outside to smoke
4. Arrested Bradley when he tired to enter his own apartment.
5. Helped the Oasis at Brandon LLC steal Bradley belongings in his
home before he returned from jail. Bradley stayed in jail for
approximately 3 days against his will.
6. On or about 24 October the Hillsborough Sheriff’s Department
representative Deputy contacted me on audio tape/Video and asked
me to remove my videos of them committing crimes see:

This is a reoccurring crime against Americans as per my ADA Clients: Lee Smith and Luanne
Simmons. Below was reported on the record to the Department of Defense, The United
Commanders, Justice Anna, the Tampa ADA Chief of Staff see:
b. On or about 23 Sep 2022, the above-mentioned respondents/defendants
i. James Sizer,
ii. Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Court,
iii. Hillsborough Sheriff’s Department
iv. the Florida Department of Children and Families Adult Program ref: Adult
Protective Investigation
v. Grace Point the source of wellness
The above respondents retaliated/ Interfered with the ADA Advocates
responsibilities while failing to protect her ADA Clients, Lee Smith and Luanne
Simmons (Exhibits A-C)
On or about 22 Sep 2022, The Sheriff’s Department and the Florida Department
of Children and Families Adult Protective Service Program ref: Adult Protective
Investigation Service arrived at LuAnne Simmons home because James Sizer (her
son), filed a fake Health and Safety Investigation against LuAnne Simmons and
Lee Smith.

When the Sheriff’s deputies and the Florida Department of Children and Families
arrived at LuAnne Simmons house, LuAnne told the police and the Family
Protective Services that (1) She was in fear for her life because she knew James
owned guns, James stole her money, and etc., Luanne also told the county that (2)
she Fear James was going to set Lee up. Luanne immediately called Lee. Lee
arrived at Luanne’s house within 15 minutes to talk to the investigators.
The Florida Department investigators asked Lee three questions based on James
complaint filed on 22 Sep 2022. The questions were: (1) Are you a drug addict?
(2) Are selling Drugs? and (3) Did you steal $50,000 from LuAnne? The answers
to those question was no.
On 23 Sep 2020, I, as Lee and Luanne’s ADA Representative immediately
complained to the authorities in Florida and asked for:
(1) An investigation/update on James’s fake case numbers for Lee Smith
(2022-2899-2901) and Luanne Simmons (2022-289-9601.
(2) Investigation on James Sizer ref: Illegal criminal activities against my
ADA Elderly Clients with the goal to stop the fraud, waste and abuse and scam to
take his mother’s property and blame his misdeeds on Lee Smith. I caught
everything on the record, video as I could foresee the crime and all the
perpetrators involved in advance as their crimes are well known and briefed at the
whistleblower conferences every year see: 2019 DC Whistleblower Blower
conference and https://www.bitchute.com/video/L0pTMXUGTdQ7/

On or about 23 Sep 2022, I, Margaret Bozgoz asked the Hillsboro County
(Charisse Martinez and Ms. Martines’s supervisor) for protection for my ADA
Clients, LuAnne Simmons and Lee Smith) against James Sizer and his illegal
claims against LuAnne and Lee (Exhibits A-C). I request this in a form of an
ADA Emergency (Exhibit C). Also note, James has been working with the police
Department as he has a bad habit of filing false reports against Lee and Luanne
(See James’ affidavit). James contacted the courts and law enforcement involving
Lee and LuAnne multiple times on: July 2, 2022, Sep 22, 2022, Sep 27, 2022, and
Sep 30, 2022. James states this under oath. This means what they (respondents)
did to my ADA Clients Lee and Luann on 2 Oct 2022 was not only planned but
was a crime in violation of 18 USC 1341.
From 23 Sep to date I, Margaret Bozgoz asked Hillsborough County and Tampa
ADA representative [via phone call and in writing] for protection for Lee Smith
and LuAnne Simmons. I specifically asked the Florida Department of Children
and Families Adult Protective Service Program Ref Adult Protective for an
Investigation under the ADA Act Titles II and III. My goal was NOT to cause
further harm, fraud, waste and abuse to my elderly clients (Exhibits A-C).
On or about 23 Sep, I informed James Sizer that I was Lee and Luanne’s ADA
Advocate and stop the harassment, lies and abuse. Although I informed James
that I was protecting Lee and Luanne from his abuse, he ignored me and lied
on his 3 Oct 2022 claim which means James and his associates are ignoring
the law WILLFULLY.

On 3 Oct 2022 at approx. 4:22 pm, James Sizer used the system (e.g., the
Sheriff’s Department, Court, Drug and Alcohol Facilities and Florida Department
of Children and Families Adult Protective Service Program ref: Adult Protective
Investigation and courts by filing a fake affidavit under oath
On 3 Oct 2022 at approx. 4:33 pm., the Court issued a void order which allowed
the Sheriff’s department to illegally enter Luanne’s house, kidnap her, pat her
down as if she were a criminal, and humiliate her at house in front of her
neighbors.
On 3 Oct 2022 at approx. 11:30 my ADA Client LuAnne contacted me and told
me that there were 2 police cars at her house and the deputies (the same sheriff’s
department that came to her house 2 weeks earlier), were forcing her to go get
medical help/DETOX? I, M. Sue Bozgoz informed the Deputy that I
representative LuAnne and Lee and asked for protection against further
harassment from James Sizer. I told the deputy that I was taping her crime and
warned her to check her company’s files starting with the reoccurring false reports
James filed against his mother. The deputy said, I have an order from the Judge
and she going with me. I told her that her actions are criminals, and I would be
filing charges and a Quo Warranto against her and her company. The Deputy said
she was hanging up on me because I threaten her. The Deputy then hung Luann’s
phone [on me]. Luanne was not allowed to call me until after 0500 the next day.
The deputy then took my ADA Client outside and patted her down as if she were
a criminal. Note: Luanne can hardly walk because she just had major surgery and
she was NOT taking any OXYCODONE as James Sizer claims.

Adult Protective Investigation and demanded that Charisse Martinez and
the Police Department stop the fraud, waste and abuse of my clients. I left my
message on Martinez voice mail. I followed up with an email to her, ADA
Tampa, DOD and etc. as I was upset that they were harming the elderly.
On 4 Oct 2022, at approximately 0500 the system gave Luanne her phone back
and started to out process her. Luanne called me, but I was asleep.
On 4 Oct 2022 at approximately 0700, I called Luanne and she was crying.
Luanne told me that they forced her to take a Urine test and they found nothing.
Luanne was crying out of control. I asked Luanne to let me talk to the
representative near her. She gave the phone to the drug/alcohol representative,
and I informed the representative at the clinic that I am Luanne’s ADA
Representative. I also informed him that I have a release to protect Luanne. I told
Luanne to give him a copy of the ADA Release. He did not want it. The
representative said he was not allowed to talk to me? I then asked the
representative his name and he refused to give me his name. I then asked the
representative to help me understand why he, the system and James Sizer are
abusing my ADA Client.
I could not see straight; I then told the representative that I was tape recording his
actions and would be using everything against him and his associates in criminal
court.
BLUF: The corporations that have charters to protect us [AMERICANS] are
violating Americans. The representative suddenly hung up LUANNE’s phone on
me.

On 4 Oct 2022, at approximately 0800, LuAnne Contacted me still crying.
Luanne said James had called the representative twice at the clinic. She also
informed me that after I talked to the representatives, he told her the
following:
1. Take another urine test. Luanne response: “NO, because I
came up clean and I can hardly walk!!! You and Jay did
enough damage”.
2. We are going to refer you to drug and alcohol clinics.
Luanne’s response, “No you are not because I came up clean.”
From 4 Oct to date, I have contacted everyone especially DOD and informed
them as per the Military war manual they must investigate (Exhibit____) as
the system steals ADA funds from the elderly, wounded warriors and
veterans and denies ADA rights. They are running a scam in violation of
HUMAN GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
c. Congress saw fit to pass the 1990 ADA and 42 USC 12203 et seq., protecting
advocates and their ADA Clients against all retaliation, coercion, threats and
intimidations, specifically stating that “No litigant is to be forced to accept an
accommodation [or void orders] preventing the advocate or attorney -in-fact from
acting fully and completely in the best interest of the litigant pursuant to 42 USC
12201. With the ADAAA in full force as of January 2009, the courts have a legal
obligation to provide all litigants with equal accommodations that ensure full
access to the judicial system. Title II addresses access to public services for all
disabilities whether apparent or not. It provides that “no qualified individual with

a disability shall, by reason of such disability be excluded from participating in or
be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or
be subject to discrimination by any such entity or third party contractor who
receives federal funds. Furthermore, the Supreme Court in Tennessee v Lane, et
al., 541 US 509 (2004) pointed out that Congress Constitutionally abrogated the
States’ Eleventh Amended immunity, making suits for damage available to
individuals who proceed under Title II of the ADA with claims of violations of
Due Process of Law. That means if Attorneys, Federal Employees. Clerks and
Judges do not adhere to the ADAAA they lose their immunity from being sued.
The Lane Court found that Congress enacted Title II against a pervasive unequal
treatment of persons with disabilities in the administration of services and
programs, including systematic deprivation of fundamental rights. Specifically,
Congress intended Title II to seek to enforce a variety of basic Constitutional
guarantee, including the right of access to the courts, “infringements of which are
subject to heightened judicial scrutiny. The Lane Court also found that all courts
have a duty to accommodate that is perfectly consistent with the well-established
due process principle that all anyone who receive federal funds, must afford to all
individuals a meaningful opportunity to be heard in its court (Tn v. Lane, 2004).
The ADA Advocate is designed “to provide a clear and comprehensive national
mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with
disabilities.” The Supreme Court concluded in Lane, “the Title II, as it applies to
the class of cases implicating the fundament right of access to the courts,
constitutes a valid exercise of Congress’ authority to enforce the guarantees of the

Fourteenth Amendment.” Congressed also passed: (1)18 USC 3771, the Crimes
Victims’ Right, (2) the Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012, (3)
The 1990 Americans with Disability Act, and (3) 2008, Americans with Disability
Act Amendments (ADAAA), Specifically to use as tools to assist disabled
individuals and/or victims and to hold their perpetrators accountable for their
human rights offenses. On 28 Jun 2020, the ADA Advocate informed the Court
and several Federal Public Entities that they needed assistance as their lives were
in danger. Equal Protection was denied, and justice was delayed.
d. Furthermore, the DC State Department, Treasury and FLORIDA Department of
Children and Families Adult Protective Services Program ref: Adult Protective
Investigation continue to ignore our request ref: Lee Smith and LeAnne
Simmons’ Abuse.
11. Request the Department of Defense/Unified Command have the US Marshall/Special
Forces issue the summons and dissolve their businesses for violating their oath of office
12. . To also provide relief to my ADA CLIENTS, Lee Smith and Luanne Under Titles
II and III of the ADA Act
a. Executive order 2017, United States Sanctions Human Rights Abusers and
Corrupt Actors Across the Globe
b. And as per 18 USC 241 and 242, Petitioner may seek relief under 1983, 1985
and 1986. Owens vs City of Independence 100 S Court 1398 (1982) and
Maine vs. Thibodeau, 100 S Court 2501 (1982).
c. Should the court not settle or provide immediate relief, expediate the court
hearing within 3-10 business days.

13. Equal Protection Under the Law (e.g., end the Death threats and attempted murder
attempts, illegal harassment by the organizations who are supposed to protect).
14. Hold everyone accountable as per 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242, 42 USC 1985 and or 42
USC 1986
15. Liquidate all their assets, courts [DOJ] throughout the United States that allow
judge/clerks to write void orders (e.g., FL,DC Courts, DC DOJ, DC Supreme Court, DC
Court of Appeals, MD Courts, Washington State Courts, GA Courts etc.).
16. Liquidate the Cabal in Building 810 and at the VA in Washington, DC.
17. Eliminate Executive Order 12196 which allows federal agencies to investigate
themselves.
18. Ensure all victims who enter the courtrooms that lawyers are not required. For example,
competent friends can help/assist.
19. Replace all corrupt lawyers with trained ADA Advocates.
20. Ensure all Judges and Sheriff DEPUTIES know the first time they issue void orders they
will be removed from the bench and position immediately. This will force the deputies
like the Hillsborough deputies from hanging up on ADA representative when they are
trying to protect their elderly clients.
21. Require all court hearings to be video taped by the courts and all victims
22. Require outside investigations of all court hearings and sheriffs departments, ADA
facilities, Florida Department of Children and Families Adult Protective Services, to
ensure courts and the Protective Services are not delaying the justice process and or
abusing their power.
23. Teach Legal Abuse Syndrome to those who took an oath to protect Americans.
Specifically insure everyone knows that Legal Abuse Syndrome is a crimes and if the
criminal Acts don’t stop they (THE SYSTEM) will be responsible for causing a
preventable health issue. Luanne and Lee (and others) have been traumatized by the
abuse of our broken system.
BACKGROUND

Margaret Bozgoz is an ADA Advocate who has been discriminated against by the
respondents for whistleblowing and protecting her ADA clients listed on the face of the claim
and against the ADA interference Act/1990 ADA. The issue is: State and Federal Agencies [and
courts] are stealing ADA Funds [and VA benefits] and denying ADA Rights.
Margaret Bozgoz and her ADA Clients (Robert and Austin Bozgoz, Lance Fulgium, James
Jimmy Ryan, Luanne Simmons and Lee Smith) are Whistleblowers who have been abused [and
threaten] by the system. Specifically, ADA Client Jimmy Ryan has been tortured by the Japanese
Military Doctors and his father’s business competitors) in violation of the Magnitsky Act which
the State Department, Japan, Senator Ben Cardin, Congressman Ruppersberger, DOD, Japanese
Ambassadors, and etc. are ignoring in violation of their oath as described in walker v. Members
of Congress. Now, Our ADA Clients, Lee Smith and Luanne Simmons have not only been
abused by the system, they uncovered another scam.
In refusing to obey the law of the Constitution and Article V Convention when required
to do so, the IRS and members of Congress not only violated federal income tax law but their
oath of office as well. The Constitution requires that all members of Congress must take an oath
of office to support the Constitution before assuming office. To comply with the Constitution,
Congress has enacted federal laws to execute and enforce this constitutional requirement. Federal
law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an
executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331,
provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before
assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have
taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of
office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which
explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone
employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the
overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918
provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1)
removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine. The definition of “advocate” is further
specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C.
7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for
any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration ... of the form of the government
of the United States by unconstitutional means.” Our form of government is defined by the

Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus,
according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government
officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of
government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311. Congress has
never altered the Article V Convention clause by constitutional amendment. Hence, the original
language written in the law by the Framers and its original intent remains undisturbed and intact.
That law specifies a convention call is peremptory on Congress when the states have applied for
a convention call and uses the word “shall” to state this. The states have applied. When members
of Congress disobey the law of the Constitution and refuse to issue a call for an Article V
Convention when peremptorily required to do so by that law, they have asserted a veto power
when none exists nor was ever intended to exist in that law. This veto alters the form of our
government by removing one of the methods of amendment proposal the law of the Constitution
creates. Such alteration without amendment is a criminal violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 and 18
U.S.C. 1918. In addition, the members of Congress committed a second criminal violation of
their oaths of office regarding an Article V Convention call. 5 U.S.C. 7311 clearly specifies it is
a criminal violation for any member of Congress to advocate the overthrow of our constitutional
form of government. The definition of the word “advocate” is to: “defend by argument before a
tribunal or the public: support or recommend publicly.” The single intent of the federal lawsuit
Walker v Members of Congress (a public record) was to compel Congress to obey the law of the
Constitution and call an Article V Convention as peremptorily required by that law, the original
intent of which has never altered by constitutional amendment. The lawsuit was brought because
Congress has refused to obey the law of the Constitution. Such refusal obviously establishes the
objective of the members of Congress to overthrow our form of government by establishing they
(the members of Congress) can disobey the law of the Constitution and thus overthrow our
constitutional form of government. The word “peremptory” precludes any objection whatsoever
by members of Congress to refuse to call an Article V Convention. This peremptory preclusion
certainly includes joining a lawsuit to oppose obeying the law of the Constitution and it may be
vetoed by members of Congress. That act not only violates the law of the Constitution but 5
U.S.C. 7311 as well. When the members of Congress joined to oppose Walker v Members of
Congress their opposition became part of the court record and therefore a matter of public record.
Thus, regardless of whatever arguments for such opposition were presented by their legal
counsel to justify their opposition, the criminal violation of the oath of office occurred because
the members of Congress joined the lawsuit to publicly declare their opposition to obeying the
law of the Constitution.
The critical event this year is when the FL Courts use the Sheriff’s department, other ADA
Agencies, and Drug and Alcohol Agencies to cause Legal Abuse Syndrome and retaliate against
the Bozgozes and their ADA CLIENTS by committing mail fraud, wire fraud, and using the
aforementioned agencies against them. The system is a scam.

What triggered this 3771 EMERGENCY was on 22 Sep 2022, ADA Advocate, Margaret Sue
Bozgoz attempted to help 2 Elderly Clients, Lee Smith and Luanne Simmons and the system
failed as per attached hard evidence.
Hans Bruns, et all vs Mary Mayhew, Commissioner, Civil Act, held that in ruling on a
motion to dismiss, a court is required to accept as true all the factual allegations in the complaint
and construe all reasonable inference in favor of the plaintiff. Knowlton v. Shaw, 708 F. Supp.
2d 69, 74 (D. Me. 2010). To state a claim under 42 USC 1983 the Plaintiffs must allege facts
establishing that a state actor had deprived them of a right, privilege or immunity secured by the
United Stated Constitution or statute. Eldredge v Town of Falmouth, 662 F. 3d 100, 104 (1st
Cir
2011); Tobin v Univ. of Maine Sys., 62 F. Supp 2d 162, 165 (D. Me 1999); 42 USC 1983. In
evaluating the Defendant’s pending Motion to Dismiss, this Court must review the Complaint to
determine whether the Plaintiffs have pled “sufficient facts” to show that [they have] a plausible
entitlement to relief. Sanchez v Pereira-Castillo, 590 F3d. 31, 41 (1st
Cir. 2009) (internal citations
omitted). The Plaintiffs’ factual allegations here are both plausible and well documented and
aside from the Defendant’s attempt to create a factual dispute about whether Maine Care was a
single, unified program, are essentially admitted by the Defendants. In this case, the Plaintiffs’
Complaint more than adequately alleges that the Defendant violated [like in our case] the Equal
Protection Clause of the United States Constitution in terminating lawful non-citizens
eligibility for the program. In our case, we are US citizens and cannot get equal protection from
our government or judicial branch.
The Supreme Court, Justice Roberts, Judge Amy B. Jackson, Judge Randolph Moss and
the Department of Justice Attorneys, Paul Cirino, Alan Burch, Matthew Khan, Fred Haynes and
the Florida Courts should know that their documented [reoccurring] actions and omissions result
in the deprivation of GOD GIVEN rights and Treason.
A Judge [or any officer of the court] engages in acts of treason if a judge does not fully comply
with the Constitution, then her orders are void Sawyer, 124 US 200 (1888). She is [and
continues to be] without jurisdiction, and she engages in act or acts of treason. Where a court
failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law, court is deprived of
juris, See Merritt v Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739. Without such jurisdiction existing, an
order entered by the court is absolutely void. A void judgement is not entitled to the respect
accorded a valid adjudication, but may be entirely disregarded, or declared inoperative by any
tribunal in which effect is sought to be given to it.
(a) Have All defendants explain in writing why they disrespected the court from 29
Jan 2019 to date by: (1) not allowing the Bozgozes equal access to the court, (2)

ignoring Reasonable Accommodations, (3) Violating the ADA interference Act
(4) threating to dismiss the Bozgozes RICO, Bivens v. Six Unknown Name
Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (hereinafter, 1983 KKK [case with merit]) filed on
29 Jan 2019, (5) retaliating against ADA Advocates specifically M. Sue Bozgoz,
(6) ignoring constitutional rights, (7) ignoring their oath of office by not reporting
the fraud, waste and abuse and (8) ignoring the EEO transmittal file submitted by
Gail Leary (9) setting the Bozgozes and their ADA Clients up by using
false/manufactured evidence as noted in the District Court Complaint,
II. The Issues Presented as it pertains to intervenors Lee Smith and Luanne Simmons
Did the Respondents abuse their discretion by:
1. Ignoring the ADA Clients request to help Lee Smith and LeAnne from further harm on
22 Sep 2022?
2. Violate their Charter
3. Steal ADA funds and Deny ADA rights
4. Cause further emotions and physical harm to Lee Smith and Luanne Simmons
5. Also James Sizer use the system to harm my ADA Clients WILFULLY
6. Fail to protect their clients, Americans.
III. The Facts Necessary to Understand the Issues Presented by the Petition
We have reason to believe that the Florida Courts, Agents and etc. are corrupt.
First the Court are and have been involved in the corruption. They give the Sheriff’s
department unlimited Control.

Also The Writ of Mandamus serves as an important check on the manner in which Court
pay respect to federal constitutional rights. The writ is the fundamental instrument for
safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless acts. Harris v Nelson, 394 US 286,
290-291. The writ of quo warranto is not a petition, but a notice of demand, issued by a
demandant to a respondent claiming some delegated power, and filed with a court of competent
jurisdiction, to hold a hearing within 3 to 20 days, depending on the distance of the respondent to
the court, to present proof of his [their] authority to execute his [their] claimed powers. If the
court finds the proof insufficient, or if the court fails to hold the hearing, the respondent must
cease to exercise the power. If the power is to hold an office they must vacate their office as
taxpayers deserve better.
The United Supreme Court has stated that “No state legislator or executive or judicial
officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper
v Aaron, 358 US 1, 78 S. Ct 1401 (1958). Any judge [or legislator or executive] who does not
comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution of the
United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law
of Land. The Judge is engaged in acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with
Constitution, then her orders are void. In re Sawyer, 124 US 200 (1888) he/she is without
jurisdiction, and he/she engaged in an act or acts of treason.
A judge is not the court. People v Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E.2d 626 (1980).
A judge is an officer of the court, as well as are all attorneys. A state judge is a state
judicial officer, paid by the State to act impartially and lawfully. A federal judge is a federal
judicial officer, paid by the federal government to act impartially and lawfully. State and federal
attorneys fall into the same general category and must meet the same requirements. Whenever

any officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he is engaged in "fraud
upon the court". In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court
stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not
fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. It is where the
court or a member is corrupted or influenced or is attempted or where the judge has not
performed his judicial function thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly
corrupted." "Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to
embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud
perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual
manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication. Kenner v. CIR.,
387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23. The 7th Circuit further
state "a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never
becomes final." Fraud upon the court makes void the orders and judgments of that court.
It is also clear and well-settled law that any attempt to commit fraud upon the court
vitiates the entire proceeding. The People of the State of Illinois v. Fred E. Sterling, 357 Ill. 354;
192 N.E. 229 (1934) ("The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters
applies to judgments as well as to contracts and other transactions. "); Allen F. Moore v. Stanley
F. Sievers, 336 Ill. 316; 168 N.E. 259 (1929) ("The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction
into which it enters ..."); In re Village of Willow brook, 37 Ill.App.2d 393 (1962) ("It is
axiomatic that fraud vitiates everything."
Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to
follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has
given another example of his "appearance of partiality" which, possibly, further disqualifies the

judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge
has evidenced an "appearance of partiality" and has possibly disqualified himself/herself. None
of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It
would appear that they are void as a matter of law and are of no legal force or effect. Should a
judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is in violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S.
Constitution, United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) ("The right to a tribunal
free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause."). Should
a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of
any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of
"interference with interstate commerce". The judge has acted in the judge's personal capacity and
not in the judge's judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no
more lawful authority than someone's next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge).
However, some judges may not follow the law.
The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he
acts without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he
has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that
suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason and may be engaged in extortion and
the interference with interstate commerce. Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no
immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate
commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.
BACKGROUND OF THE CASE
See above and attached.

Plaintiffs Robert and Sue Bozgozes are service-disabled veterans. M. Sue Bozgoz is
Robert’s, Austin, Lance Fulgium, Jimmy and James Ryan’s. Lee Smith and Luanne’s [and
other’s wounded warrior’s] ADA Advocate.
In 2016 M. Sue Bozgoz realized that VA HQ supervisors were discriminating against
Robert Bozgoz. After learning of the abuse, M. Sue Bozgoz [with the help of VA HQ Chief of
Staff, Mike Frueh] coordinated ADA Reasonable Accommodations for Robert to prevent harm.
On 11 Jan 2018, Robert Bozgoz questioned his supervisors Voncelle James and Angela
Kendrix’s discriminatory Act and the illegal retaliation against Robert and ADA Advocate
Lieutenant Colonel M. Sue Bozgoz started. Voncelle and Angela are the main perpetrators in the
Bozgozes district court case. Everything captured on audio, video and tape see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_o66bc_a9Q
From 11 Jan 20187 to date, the VA HQ’s Defendants ignored the ADA interference Act
and refused to allow Lieutenant Colonel M. Sue Bozgoz to do her job as an ADA Advocate for
her husband and other VA Employees/whistle blowers. VA and its associates retaliated by way
of threats, intimidations, false imprisonment, false police reports, false peace orders and
false/manufactured criminal charges as noted in the amended claims – See the 9th
Amended
Complaint.
On January 29, 2019, Margaret S. Bozgoz (the Petitioner) and Austin R. Bozgoz (the
Petitioner’s son) filed a RICO, 1983 KKK and Privacy Act Violation civil action (with merit)
against Voncelle James, Robert Wilkie, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and many others under
the Zone of interest after they discovered the VA EEOC/ORM process was rigged.

From 29 Jan 2019 to date, the Defendants have worked together to delay, deny, and
dismiss the Bozgozes and Lance Fulgium’s district court case by way of violating constitutional
rights.
On 5 March 2019, Margaret and Austin filed the following at District Court: (1)
ECF/CM password (again), (2) Reasonable Accommodation to expedite the case due to the
reoccurring abuse and Robert’s current condition (recovering from a stroke VA caused by
ignoring his board- certified doctor’s orders and (3) Request to have the US Marshall deliver the
summons due to the VA abuse.
The case was assigned Civil Action Case Number 1:19-CV-00239-ABJ (Case 1-ABJ)
and assigned to District Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
On or about 1 March 2019, District Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued an order
demanding the Plaintiffs, Margaret S. Bozgoz and Austin R. Bozgoz to show standing. Judge
Amy Berman Jackson requested Margaret and Austin show standing even though both Margaret
and Austin had provided the court: business, school and medical receipts which proved relief
owed by the VA due to their abuse which is well documented. Hans Bruns, et all vs Mary
Mayhew, Commissioner, Civil Action- Plaintiff Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,
1st
Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 13-1456. In ruling on a motion to dismiss, a court is
required to accept as true all the factual allegations in the complaint and construe all
reasonable interferences in favor of the plaintiff.
On or about March 1, 2019, the Petitioner submitted medical, business and school’s
receipts showing standing for both Margaret and Austin R. Bozgoz.

On March 5, 2019, Robert Bozgoz, a Department of Veterans Affairs employee moved to
intervene.
On or about April 23, 2019, Judge Jackson issued an order dismissing Austin R. Bozgoz
from the case because Judge Amy Jackson stated “Austin was submitting his request on his
father’s behalf” which as the record shows is not a fact. In that same order Judge Amy Jackson
granted Robert Bozgoz permission to intervene stating the claims were filed under Title VII
while ignoring the RICO, 1983 KKK, 1985, 1986, Privacy Acts, and etc., violations. The
Bozgozes protested but the protest went ignored as Judge Amy Jackson violated her oath of
office.
Also, Judge Amy Jackson violated her oath of office under 28 USC 453 by denying the
Plaintiffs the right to serve the summons they had received from the court on 29 Jan 2019. Judge
Amy Jackson refused to respond to the Plaintiffs until 2 April 2019 in violation of 42 USC
12101 denying Reasonable Accommodations/ADA 1990 Act and US v Will, 449 US 200, 216
101 S Ct 471 66 L Ed. 2d, 406 (1980). Cohens v Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5L Ed 257
(1821) which states, whenever, a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the
judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.
On 2 April 2019, Judge Amy Jackson allowed the DC United States Attorney, Fred
Haynes to deny Reasonable Accommodations in violation of 42 USC 12101 while VA
Leadership (Robert Wilkie, Paul Lawrence, Margarita Devlin, Mike Frueh, Willie Clark, Ronald
Burke, Angela Kendrix, Melvin Gerrets, Karen Agee, Kevin Brown, Denise Williams,
Christopher Wunsch, Jada Britt, Judy Valois, David Fitchitt, Dana Dizel, and etc.) watched.

Specifically, on 2 April 2019, VA Leaders ordered VA Security to falsely imprison Lieutenant
Colonel M. Sue Bozgoz for attempting to turn in Robert’s resignation at DC VA HQ.
On 5 June 2019 to date, Judge Amy Jackson assisted the VA Leadership, VA Security
Director, Darryl Blackwell, District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County, Circuit Court
for Montgomery County, Maryland, and the DC States Attorney’s Office using VA’s GS14
Voncelle James as a pawn to set the Bozgozes up while their process server, Lance Fulgium was
serving the summons which Judge Amy Jackson signed.
On 6 June 2019 at approximately 0700, Voncelle James and her husband, Khalil James
assaulted Lance Fulgium, the Bozgozes process server/son.
On 6 June 2019 at approximately 0900, Lieutenant Colonel M. Sue Bozgoz reported the
assault and forwarded the video to VA Leadership, DOJ, DC Assistant US Attorney, Fred
Haynes and VA Security, Darryl Blackwell.
On 6 June 2019, Voncelle James filed a false police report, false peace order and perjured
herself at 11:00 am [after she was served her summons]. She then filed several criminal charges
against Robert and M. Sue Bozgoz using the fabricated evidence [peace order]. She did this
while VA Leaders, the District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County, MD and the Circuit
Court of Montgomery County, Maryland, the DC United States Attorney’s Office and Judge
Amy Jackson supported Voncelle James confessed under oath on 6 June, 13 June, 19 July and 19
Sep.

From 6 June to date, the Judges and Commissioners of the District Court of Maryland for
Montgomery County, MD ignored the ADA Act and denied the Bozgozes and Lance Fulgium
ADA Rights as noted in the 5th
Amended Claim Version 5 Complaint.
9 June 2019, Voncelle James filed false criminal charges against Robert and M. Sue
Bozgoz in violation of 42 USC 12203 while VA leadership, Congressman Ruppersberger, and
Senator Ben Cardin’s representatives watched.
13 June 2019, Voncelle James lied in Court while Judge Williams ignored the hard facts
(Video) of Voncelle James and her husband, Khalil James assaulting Lance Fulgium in violation
of 18 USC 1501.
On or about 16 June 2019 to 19 Nov 2019, the Montgomery County Commissioners (J.
Gray, Tracy D’ Souza), States Attorney (John McCarthy), and SR Clerk (Tawana Holland) and
ADA Coordinator (Markisha Gross) refused to allow Lance Fulgium to press charges against
Voncelle James and her husband for assault on a process server while ignoring/denying ADA
Rights.
19 July 2019, Judge Williams refused to recuse himself during the reconsideration
hearing as a matter of law. Again, Judge Williams ignored hard evidence (Voncelle James
fraudulent police report) and allowed Voncelle James to perjure herself in court. Judge Williams
then ignored the fact that Voncelle James filed false criminal charges against Robert and M. Sue
Bozgoz on 9 June while as Voncelle used his fake void order.
“The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime. “Miller v US
230 F.2d 486, 489 (1956).

On June 24, 2019, Judge Amy Jackson lied about receiving the Bozgozes opposition to
deny the DC US States Attorney’s [Fred Haynes] motion to extend his response. Judge Amy
Jackson also lied about not receiving the Bozgozes request to have the US Marshal deliver their
summons to Defendants. As a result, Voncelle James, VA Leadership, and the DC United States
Attorney’s Office file manufactured evidence against Robert and Margaret Bozgoz to secure a
fake police report, fake peace order and several fake criminal charges designed to delay, deny
and dismiss their district court case.
On or about 30 June 2019, VA HQ’s ADA Director, Chris Wunsch committed mail fraud
by sending the Bozgozes a FOIA response which he lied about Robert’s 2016 Reasonable
Accommodations. Chris Wunsch lied knowing the facts were found in the EEOC/ORM
transmittal records and in an effort to hide the fact that: (1) VA Doctor, Dr. Racha fabricated
Robert’s Reasonable Accommodation medical records and ORM ordered Voncelle James and
Angela Kendrix to violate the Bozgoz family privacy under the name of Cindy Boyd which
Voncelle James confirmed under oath/affidavit on 6 Aug 2018 against HIPAA and NIST .
On or about 9 Aug 2019, the Attorney General from Texas (Warren Kenneth Paxton)
coordinated with the DC Attorney General (Karl Racine) and DOJ (Alan Burch) to set Lance
Fulgium up using the TX court system as per the TX State Judge [and clerk] who declined to
participate in any involvement in the criminality. Specifically, in August, they coordinated a 13
Feb and 8 April 2020 “fake” court dates designed to oppress Lance Fulgium, the Bozgozes’

process server. In addition, these people issued fake summons and harassed Lance at his work
using the Elmore County, Idaho Sheriff’s department.
On or about 1 Oct 2018 to 1 Sep 2019, Judy Jarchow Lane was hired by VA to deceive
the Federal workers compensation process. Judge Jarchow allowed Voncelle James to lie on her
workers compensation report. On 26 July 2019, she also attended the workers compensation
hearing and said nothing about Voncelle James’ fraud, waste, and abuse.
On 19 Sep 2019, Judge Debra Dwyer, testified in court for Voncelle James. She allowed
Voncelle James to bring in protected medical records to use against the Bozgoz family (Lance,
Austin, M. Sue, and Robert). Judge Dwyer also denied M. Sue Bozgoz’s motion to dismiss the
false claim, and Subject Matter Jurisdiction Challenge. Judge Dwyer further committed treason
by erasing the Motion to Dismiss challenge from the record with the help of Mathew Bonner.
She also issued void orders ordering the Bozgozes to pay for fake Kangaroo court.
From 5 March 2019, to date, Judge Amy Jackson refused to recuse herself as per the law
from 5 March to date as she had:
(1) Hidden stock in VA contracts.
(2) Lied on 24 June 2019 regarding the Bozgozes objection to Fred Haynes, Assistant
U.S. Attorney’s request for extension.
(3) Violated the Bozgoz’s Constitutional Rights as documented.
(4) Issued void minute orders.

(5) Denied basic rights/equal access into the court causing the Bozgozes to spend
thousands of dollars on priority mail vs electronic filing.
(6) Returned several affidavits back to the Bozgozes vs filing on record.
(7) Allowed the DOJ (Alan Burch) to lie.
(8) Informed the public that the “TRUTH STILL MATTERS” but does not follow her
own example by violating the public trust all by design.
On 4 Sep 2019, Plaintiffs Robert and Margaret Bozgoz filed an Amended Complaint with
all claims against Defendants. Again, as a matter of law, Judge Amy Jackson refused to recuse
herself. She issued an ordered that severed case. Judge Amy Jackson informed the Bozgozes
that she would be responsible for all claims dated 29 Jan 2019 (Case 1-ABJ) and earlier while
Judge Randolph Moss would rule over all claims after 29 Jan 2019 to date (Case 2-RDM).
19 Sep 2019, During the De NOVO hearing, DC Assistant United States Attorney,
Matthew Khan informed the Bozgozes that he would be replaced by DC Assistant United States
Attorney, Alan Burch. Both ignored the fact that Voncelle James was in court perjuring herself
with the Bozgozes’ protected medical information.
On or about 25 November 2019, the Montgomery County States Attorney, John
McCarthy punished the Bozgozes for reporting Voncelle James Privacy and NIST Security
violation by ignoring the facts and informing the Bozgozes that he would violate the Bozgozes
rights by not using Voncelle James stolen information she obtained from VA. While invading the
Bozgozes privacy by subpoenaing their COMCAST email records.

On or about July 2019 to 25 Nov 2019, Tawana Holland and Markisha Gross denied,
lied, and ignored ADA Reasonable Accommodations for Robert, M. Sue Bozgoz and Lance
Fulgium.
On or about 19 Oct 2019, Alan Burch committed mail fraud by sending Judge Debra
Dwyer’s void order through the mail, and fabricating 9 claims he received from VA Leadership,
Gail Leary, Dr. Anne Klein, Megan Brennan, Lois Scoon, Gary Richardson, Angela Myers,
French Bryant, James Byrne, Judy Valois, Fred Haynes,. L. Marie Anderson, Daniel Spilsbury.
He did this knowing the real claims are found in the transmittal record submitted by Gail Leary
(Post Office) using VA’s letter head.
On or about 25 September 2019 through 25 November 2019, Markisha Gross, Court
ADA coordinator called the Bozgozes and denied ADA Reasonable Accommodations and
interfered with the ADA interference act thereby denying Civil Rights. She did this knowing she
was being voice recorded.
On 25 November 25, the District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County, MD, VA
Leadership and Judge Rand Lewis Gelber ignored the Bozgozes De novo hearing and ordered
Robert to attend fake criminal court while Judge Gelber violated the ADA Interference Act and
issued a void order designed to intimidate and exacerbated his disabilities.

On March 5, 2019, Plaintiff Robert Bozgoz, filed a second Motion for ECF/CM access
and a Third Motion for ECF/CM access on May 17, 2019.
On May 21, 2019 and July 12, 2019, Judge Jackson denied both Motions for ECF/CM
access citing that she was anticipating a dispositive Motion from the Defendants.
In Aug 2019, Judge Amy Jackson became a defendant. On or about 4 Sep 2019, Judge
Amy Jackson issued a void order without signing it with the intent to commit fraud upon the
court. She then severed the case to Judge Randolph Moss knowing the Bozgoz case is a
“continuous” abuse of civil rights case.
Alan Burch fails to communicate with Robert and Margaret. He pretends to go on leave
and informs them to contact, United States Attorneys Paul Mussenden, and Jeremy Simon who
are following the fraud, waste and abuse and fails to file a complaint as per their oath and code of
ethics.
13 Jan 2020, Judge Padgett commits treason in his court room by failing to dismiss
Robert and Sue’s ADA Client Jeff Blochowicz’s criminal case. Furthermore, allowing his
sheriff to violate the ADA interference Act by throwing ADA Advocate Kim Blochowicz out of
the court room. Attorney Hank Crane further violated the ADA interference Act by lying to
ADA Advocate M. Sue Bozgoz.

14 Jan 2020, Lance Fulgium get his steering pump line cut, while Robert and M. Sue
Bozgoz are run off the highway.
15 Jan 2020, the Bozgozes report the treason in Judge Padgett’s courtroom to Federal
Judges Amy Jackson, Judge Moss and DC US Attorney Alan Burch.
On or about 20 Feb 2020 Judge Moss threatened the Bozgozes that he would dismiss
their RICO and 1983 KKK case [with merit] if they continued to express their concerns
regarding constitutional rights violations. Furthermore, Judge Moss, dismissed Judge Amy
Berman Jackson and Judge Zuberi Williams from the Bozgoz’s case, knowing they violated the
Bozgozes’ and Lance Fulgium’s constitutional rights. In addition, he returned the Bozgozes
affidavits proving criminality and returned their summonses, which had not been issued by the
Clerk of the Court.
On or about 27 Feb 2020, Judge Amy Jackson threatened the Bozgoz that she would
dismiss their RICO and 1983 KKK case with merit if they continued to ask questions and submit
motions.
On or about 10 March 2020, Attorney Joan Weber, of the VA General Counsel’s Office
contacted Robert Bozgoz knowing he had an ADA Representative that she should have
contacted.

On or about 11 March 2020, Robert P. Kirchhoefer, denied the Bozgozes Form 95
knowing VA abused their authority and ADA rights and without turning VA Leadership into
authorities.
On or about 13 April 2020, VA Vocational Rehabilitation Coordinator Noelle Clemmons,
threatened to terminate Sue Bozgoz’s vocation rehabilitation contract due to the VA fraud,
waste, and abuse issue.
On or about 13 April 2020, L. Wilson, Supervisor, VA Medical Center Baltimore, MD
denied Robert’s request for a copy of a Sensitive Patient Access Report (SPAR).
On 9 June 2020, Judge Amy Jackson [vs Judge Moss] issued another void order
pertaining to allowing 6 defendants from the District Court Claims to be dismissed
On or about 13 June 2020, Judge Padgett, Nathalie Paine, Hank Crane, Timothy O’Brien
coordinated a fake criminal court hearing while violating ADA interference rights in retaliation.
This was done while they allow the Augusta, GA Chronicle to publish fake news about their
client, VA employee, Jeff Blochowicz.
On or about 17 June 2020, Laverne Hill (a GS6 legal assistant) from the VA, Office of
General Counsel sent an Administrative Tort Claim response designed to deceive, delay, and
deny justice. It advised the Bozgozes that the Attorney General’s regulation provides an agency

another 6 months period to wait for justice when VA and the courts have all the evidence on
hand. VA does not get another 6 months.
Writ Petition Timeline
18 May 2020 – Initial Writ filed under Marbury vs Madison, Article VII of the Constitution and
Title II Section 42 USC et seq EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH
DISABILITIES and ADA Protection. This shows how Austin and Sue has standing and how
Jackson dismissed the case.
21 May 2020 – General Flynn filed a Writ and was seen within ten days.
9 June 2020 – Judge Amy Jack signed and dated a void order for Randolph. Issue: she failed to
wait for higher court decision on the writ. Note: The respondents who ran the Petitioners off the
highway settled with Petitioners Margaret and Robert Bozgoz. Once those respondents settled,
the petitioners requested a motion from the district court to release them, however, Judge Amy
Jackson approved the order which was void because of 18 May Writ to recuse her as a matter of
law. According to law, Judge Amy Jackson must follow the law vs sign and date void orders.
9 June 2020- Petitioners informed the court and the Department of Justice the issue: How
Jackson disrespected the court.
26 June 2020 – Petitioners added the Quo and Supplement as the Court failed to call a hearing
within 3 to 20 days. The Petitioners also requested in writing that the court publish their public
interest case for the public. Issue: The Court of Appeals retaliated by (1) issuing an order signed
by a clerk denying the writ hearing [without looking at the evidence] and (2) denying to
Petitioners request to have media/public exposure as the case is a public interest case.
29 Jun 2020 – Petitioners ignore void order and updates the writ by adding ADA Jamie Foxes
perpetrator, VA Employee, Brandon Coleman. ADA Advocate informed Higher court, VA,
Department of Justice and Federal Court that ADA Clients and Whistleblowers need immediate
protection.
1 July 2020 DC Court of Appeal accepts with Petitioners Opposition to their order and schedules
a rehearing without giving the petitioners a hearing date.
1 July 2020 – ADA Advocate adds DC Court of Appeal Judges and Clerks on their Quo
Warranto and Writ for disrespecting the court.
4 July 2020, VA Tort Attorney, Tara Jones contact ADA Advocate and informs her that she, her
family, and ADA Clients are in danger. She informs ADA Advocate that it is normal for people
like us to die by way of car crash. Ms. Jones informs the ADA Advocate that she should expect
to be run off the road until the day she dies.

4 July 2020 – ADA Advocate reports death threat to MD Commission – Protection Denied. She
also reports incident to FBI, VA, Federal Courts and VA Leadership.
28 July 2020 Emergency Supplement due to death threats. Asked the court to provide ADA
Advocate and ADA Clients (to include Jeff and Kim Blochowicz) Equal Protect. ADA Advocate
asked the court to apple the 3771 and reminded them they had a duty to protect.
Also note, in the Epstein Case, 1 hour after the victim’s filed their 3771, the court heard their
case and settled. The Petitioners demanded equal treatment as per 1990 ADA.
31 July 2020 – Petitioner Robert Bozgoz’ father dies. Note: Court denied AD Reasonable
Accommodations to expedite case.
4 Aug and 14 Aug Federal Judge Amy Jackson and Randolph Moss begin to write move void
orders without waiting for writ hearing. DOJ, Alan Burch answers void orders.
ADA Advocate and Petitioners complain to higher court. Call and talked to clerk BJ. BJ
informed the petitioners that the court accepted our 26 June Opposition and granted a rehearing
but could not provide a date and time.
26 Aug 2020 – Petitioners demanded an update of re-scheduled hearing.
NOTE: The Petitioners added Donald Trump and General Omar Jones to their Writ and Quo
Warranto for ignoring a life and death situation.
26 Aug 2020 – DC Court of Appeal sends another void order signed by a court clerk in
Delay process and Petitioners complained of delaying the process and causing added
stress/legal abused causing LAS. As a result, Petitioners add all three DC Court of Appeals
Judge and Clerks to their quo warranto for fraud.
28 Aug 2020 – ADA Advocate, Margaret Bozgoz informs court, President Trump, Senator Ben
Cardin that ADA Clients Jimmy and James Ryan were not getting help from the State
Department and Japanese government ref: Jimmy’s illegal human experimentation by the
Japanese Government and Jimmy’s fathers business competitors. ADA Advocates informed the
leaders and justice system that she, her family and ADA Clients are being retaliated against. She
requests equal protection under Titles II and III and the Magnitsky Act – Informed them again
that it was an emergency.
1 Sep 2020, Court of Appeal Judge Griffith retires from the Court of Appeal Bench.

6 Sep 2020 – ADA Advocated requested to be heard by the DC Court of Appeals. Negative
response. Therefore, she submitted another writ update
11 Sep 2020 ADA Advocated requested to be heard by the DC Court of Appeals. Negative
response. Therefore, she submitted another writ update Pro Confesso for ignoring emergency
2 Oct 2020 – Judge Griffin, DC Court of Appeals Judge who the Petitioners added to their writ
on 26 June 2020 for disrespecting the court by allowing the Court Clerks to sign the initial 18
Writ.
On or about 29 Oct 2020, the Petitioners reminded the DOJ that they could not represent retirees
and anyone who violated constitutional rights as per the Westfalls Act.
29 Oct 2020 – In retaliation, DC Court of Appeals order ADA Advocate to stop opposing and
complaining. The DC Court send the ADA Advocate a denial of the EMEGENCY WRIT
DATED 26 Aug 2020. The order is also another void order as it was signed by a clerk. Also, the
emergency request can be found on the 28 Jun 2020 motion and 28 Aug 2020. The ADA
Advocate updates the public, DOJ, DOD, Department of State. She demonstrates how the court
willfully causes Legal Abuse Syndrome when we do not comply. She also reports void orders to
Attorney Nancy, and Court Clerks BJ and Laura at the DC Court of Appeals.
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJquRAh8Gj0&t=738s
From Oct to November, the Petitioners reached to Joe Biden and VP Elect Harris for support.
Although their staff reached out for money nobody paid attention to the Emergency ref: Jimmy.
3 Nov – The Petitioners once again, opposed the DC Court of Appeals 29 Oct 2020. The
Petitioners also added the Department of Justice, AUSA, Paul Cirino on their district court case
and quo warranto for disrespecting the court and his oath by trying to defend public entities who
violated the ADA Act and the Westfall Act.
3 Nov 2020 to date, Senator Ron Johnston reached out to all Americans and informed anyone to
come forward if they knew about mail fraud or any fraud that might have affected the election.
The fraud was reported to his staff and sent to his DC office. The fraud was also report
16 Nov – The Petitioners continued to demand justice and complained to the President, DOD,
DOJ, Senator Ben Cardin, Congressman and DC Leaders. The Petitioners posted all documents
on the record using social media at:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfjXoxzVPlkqddMIvX0s_Pw?view_as=subscriber
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcFZOaDcncjDbi71tKcxEcw
and https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ6O0-H8w2Y4jm2DYCn1xag

23 Nov 2020 – ADA Advocate contacted the DC Court Clerk, Laura and request an update on
their writ hearing, Laura informed the ADA Advocate on the record that her boss said to not
accept anything from the petitioners after 29 Oct 2020. ADA Advocate reports interstate
commerce violations to FTC, SEC and requested an Enforcement & Compliance investigation
through OFCCP.
NOTE: on order dated 9 Oct 2020, the DC Court of Appeals states that they denied the
Petitioners writ motion dated, 26 Aug 2020, Entitled EMERGENCY. WRONG aka
administrative trickery. The Petitioners motions entitled EMERGECY IS dated: 28 July and 28
Aug 2020 has EMERGENCY.
Note: ADA Clients Dr. Kimberly Blochowicz and Jeffery Blochowicz are going through the
same challenges in Augusta, GA. The ADA Advocate, Margaret Bozgoz wrote and gave the
Dr. Kimberly Blochowicz and Jeffery Blochowicz the same writ, the only difference is six (6)
Judges in August recused themselves immediately. The question is why are these public entities
recuses and removing themselves?
29 Jan 2021, the Petitioners submit a timely Supreme Court case to the court (Exhibit 1).
1 Feb 2021, the Petitioners submit a reasonable accommodations request to expedite the supreme
court case.
On or about 14 Feb 2020, the supreme court uses the wrong void order signed by a clerk and
informs the Bozgozes that their supreme court documents are late. The Bozgozes protest.
29 March 2021, The Petitioners inform Justice Roberts, Supreme Court, United State Treasury,
Attorney General and Sec of State that the Supreme Court clerks are violating constitutional and
human rights (Exhibit 1).
On or about 4 April 2021, Justice Anna informs the Petitioners that they commercial court are
gaslighting and to move the case outside of the court (Exhibit 2). Furthermore, the petitioners
learn that the courts throughout the United States at every level are violating their oath of
office.
12 April 2021, the Petitioners send a message to the Japanese Ambassador in preparation for the
Japanese Prime minister’s human rights visit on 16 April 2021.
16 April 2021, the Japanese Prime minister meets with Biden but fails to discuss Jimmy’s case.
They also inform the public that Japan would be a safe place to visit during the Olympics

knowing Jimmy and 100 other disabled children had been illegally experiment on at NIHON
University while the doctors attend Harvard.
On 9 and 14 April 2021, the Supreme Court Clerks commits mail fraud again and informs the
petitioners that they are rejecting their case because they were late. The clerks denied Justice
Robert is the right to respond to the complaint against them (Exhibit 1)
Timeline as it pertains to ADA Client Jimmy Ryan illegal human experimentation
Juntendo University hospital, and Kiyoshi Sato, Address: 3-27-23-3F,
Shakujiimachi, Nerima-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
February 24 1997, Japanese doctors, Kiyoshi Sato, from Juntendo University hospital,
knowingly made false statements with the intent to conceal from Jimmy's parents the
important medical examination findings and medical records that showed: A. Jimmy was in
perfectly normal condition, B. He a healthy appetite, C. He had no fever or any symptoms, D.
Jimmy's anterior fontanel was normal and E. ABSOLUTELY NO legitimate medical reason to
subject Jimmy, an infant, to life-threatening brain surgery.
Subsequent depriving child of necessary medical treatment would cause infliction of severe pain
and suffering and grievous bodily injuries
The incontrovertible medical record and witness evidence clearly shows Kiyoshi Sato and
Japanese doctors conspired to make false statements to deceive parents: to subject Jimmy, a
healthy 2-month-old U.S. infant, to inherently dangerous and medically unnecessary brain
surgeries that:
 Maliciously removed pieces of Jimmy's brain tissue and his infant skull -for no known medical
reason.
 Kiyoshi Sato, willfully inflicted Jimmy, an infant, with severe pain, suffering and severe brain
damage and life-threatening uncontrollable seizures.
Human Experimentation on an infant and violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 2340A – Torture’ inflict
severe physical or mental pain or suffering. https://www.justice.gov/file/18791/download

Juntendo University hospital, and Shinichi Nijima, Address 3-27-23-3F,
Shakujiimachi, Nerima-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
May 13-14 1997, Juntendo University doctor, Shinichi Nijima, knowingly and
willfully injected Jimmy -a infant just inflicted with severe brain damage- with a
lethal (IV) dose of Sodium Thiopental a deadly drug normally used for lethal injection in death
penalty. Shinichi Nijima willfully inflicted Jimmy, an infant, with severe pain, suffering and
severe brain damage as Jimmy suffered severe irreversible hypoxic brain injury induced by
cardiac and respiratory arrest- as the doctors recklessly to place infant on a ventilator.
Juntendo University hospital doctors knowingly lied to conduct medically unwarranted, life-
threatening brain surgery experiments on an infant and subsequent lethal (IV) dose of a death
penalty drug-used for a lethal injection, without the parents informed consent are egregious
violations of international human rights law, the principles of medical ethics, that defied all
medical logic and without the patients the right to informed consent. Human Experimentation on
an infant and violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 2340A – Torture’ inflict severe physical or mental
pain or suffering. https://www.justice.gov/file/18791/download
Nakajima Yoshiko and the Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation Address:
Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IBRI) Bldg., 2-2, Minatojima
Minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo 650-0047, JAPAN
On December 24 2007, James and Miki Ryan announced their intention to report to Japan police
evidence of corruption, corporate fraud, conspiracy, and scientific fraud carried out by high-
ranking scientists (Professor Shinichi Nishikawa, Professor Yoshiki Sasai, and Hitoshi Niwa
M.D., Ph.D. the same three scientists involved in STAP cell scandal), staff and officials’ from
two of Japans largest -public funded scientific institutions (RIKEN & IBRI) and Kenzo
Nakajima, Yoshiko Nakajima’s spouse.
https://www.fbri-kobe.org/english/ ; http://www.cdb.riken.jp/en/
December 26, 2007 Nakajima Yoshiko, a (IBRI) high-ranking government official and
coordinator at Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation, knowingly aimed threats of
harm explicitly at 11-yr-old Jimmy Ryan, with intent to terrorize and coerce James and Miki
Ryan (Jimmy’s parents) to cover up the evidence of illegal activity -which included Nakajima
Yoshiko and the officials spouse.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines "international terrorism" (i) Involved violent acts or acts
dangerous to human life, (ii) intimidate or coerce a civilian population, (iii) occurred outside the
territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.

(Note: In July 2014, RIKEN scientist (Professor Yoshiki Sasai), confessed to Miki Ryan,
Jimmy’s mother, claiming Nakajima Yoshiko had ordered the torture and suffocation of Jimmy
with a plastic bag. The scientist also claimed needles were pierced deeply into Jimmy’s brain
through his eyes and nose; Also, Nakajima Yoshiko had ordered Nihon University doctors to
torture and inflict Jimmy with severe pain, suffering and harm.)
Dr. Reiji Kojima Address: Yamanashi University Graduate School, 1110
Shimokato, Chuo City, Yamanashi Prefecture 409-3898
On December 28, 2007 Japanese military medical officers, Dr. Wakamatsu Hajime,
Dr. Reiji Kojima, and Military Head Nurse, Iwahana Mayumi, at Bōei Ika
Daigakkō military hospital, knowingly and willfully conspired to drug and violently
suffocate Jimmy, a vulnerable U.S. minor child (11-yr-old) with disabilities, with a
plastic bag placed over his head and tightened around his neck - without parents informed
consent or any known medical reason. An egregious violation of law and principles of medical
ethics, and the patients the right to informed consent.
The doctors subsequently took blood tests to confirm Jimmy suffered severe pediatric traumatic
brain injury, had a high risk of death, then knowingly and willingly withheld urgent medical
treatment on Jimmy, with intent to torture and inflict Jimmy with severe pain, suffering and life-
threatening bodily harm.
(Jimmy was staying at the military hospital and fully recovered from a seasonal cold and was
expected to be released on the morning of 28th; Dr. Kojima refused to release Jimmy. Suspicious
behavior, as it was the last Friday of the year and children without symptoms were released
because of end-of-year holiday.)
Incontrovertible AUDIO EVIDENCE overwhelming conclusively proves Doctor Reiji Kojima
admits he was in hospital room and placed a plastic bag over Jimmy's head between five to ten
minutes. He claimed head Nurse Iwahana Mayumi (who admitted to acting as “Lookout”), and
Doctor Wakamatsu were in the hospital room with him at the time. Click:
https://youtu.be/CZmYuusP6BM Human Experimentation on an infant and violation of Title 18
U.S.C. § 2340A – Torture’ inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering.
https://www.justice.gov/file/18791/download
On Dec 29th, Jimmy twice suffered cardiac arrest
RETALIATION
Nakajima Yoshiko, On October 22, 2010, Incontrovertible evidence shows Nakajima Yoshiko,
a high-level Japanese government official, orchestrated a criminal conspiracy coordinated with
Professor Shigeru Kinoshita and JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., with the aim to criminally
sabotage James and Miki’s stem cell company, Arblast USA Inc., merger and acquisition with
Forticell Biosciences, a public traded USA biotechnology company based in New York.

Nakajima Yoshiko co-conspirators knowingly and willfully conspired to fabricate evidence,
made false statements with intent to defraud to steal patents exclusively licensed to James Ryan’s
USA stem cell company; Nakajima Yoshiko co-conspirators knowingly and willfully perpetrated
“uttering a false instrument" with malicious intent to commit fraud against a United States
company; deceitfully forged EU and U.S. federal documents; unlawfully revoking EU and U.S.
patents (Federal Felony) with plans to establish a new company immediately after the
coordinated crime.
Title 18, U.S.C. §1832 Economic Espionage Act of 1996 commercial theft of trade.
Shin Ashida, and JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., 〒659-0021 3-19 Kasuga-cho,
Ashiya-shi, Hyogo
Shin Ashida, JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. CEO, on October 22, 2010, involved in
a criminal conspiracy with Yoshiko Nakajima to steal JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
(JCR is a Japan-based competitor company of James Ryan primarily engaged in
pharmaceuticals and regenerative medicine) main profitable drug is “GROWJECT®”
an approved treatment of children stunted growth and development caused by growth hormone
deficiency and/or poor nutrition. Title 18, U.S.C. §1832 Economic Espionage Act of 1996
commercial theft of trade.
Motohiro Kasahara Address: 2-chome, Kanda Nishiki-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo,
Japan 101-0054
August, 2011, Motohiro Kasahara, a private attorney for Akira Kitagawa, who filed
his client’s mental illness medical certification signed by Dr. Tateyama Masato on July
01, to Japan Government to enable Akira Kitagawa to receive compensation for a
severe mental illness -that left Kasahara’s client incapacitated and unable to work.
Kasahara Motohiro knew his client was mentally ill and not responding to medical treatment. On
Aug 2011 Motohiro Kasahara joined Yoshiko Nakajima’s criminal conspiracy, used his severe
mental ill client to knowingly and willfully perpetrated “uttering a false instrument" with
malicious intent to commit fraud against a United States company. The Subjects deceitfully
forged EU and U.S. federal documents; unlawfully revoking EU and U.S. patents
Title 18, U.S.C. §1832 Economic Espionage Act of 1996 commercial theft of trade.

QUo Warranto 1 Dec 2022.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to QUo Warranto 1 Dec 2022.docx

Similar to QUo Warranto 1 Dec 2022.docx (20)

More from SueBozgoz

More from SueBozgoz (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

QUo Warranto 1 Dec 2022.docx