Kangaroo Court is Illegal as it causes Legal Abuse Syndrome SueBozgoz
The document alleges corruption and illegal activities by the United States court system, VA, and law enforcement agencies. It claims they have violated the rights of veterans and elderly citizens through kangaroo courts, illegal entry, theft, false imprisonment, and denial of accommodations. Evidence is provided in links showing coordination between these entities to retaliate against whistleblowers through administrative trickery, backdating documents, and legal abuse. The writer challenges the jurisdiction and void orders of the court, and requests the Department of Defense investigate apparent ongoing criminal activities.
How to survive small claims court presentation 5.15.19Madison Williamson
This document provides information and guidance for individuals filing a claim or defending themselves in small claims court in San Diego County, California. It outlines who can file a claim, monetary limits, required procedures for serving the defendant and notifying the court, what types of evidence and documentation should be brought to trial, and options for collecting on a judgment. The primary goals of small claims court are to provide a low-cost and informal process for resolving civil claims of $10,000 or less.
The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner who entered India after 1971. She provided 11 documents to prove her citizenship but the Tribunal found flaws. It noted discrepancies in names in voter lists from different villages and years. Certificates from village heads were inadmissible without examining authors. Land records did not prove inheritance from parents before 1971. Witnesses could not establish linkage to parents. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's opinion, finding no infirmity in its appreciation of evidence and fulfillment of principles of natural justice. The petition was dismissed.
Amy Jackson - research - the truth still matters - nothing but the facts.pptxSueBozgoz
See how Deep States VA Attorneys in Building 810, Judge Amy B.Jackson, DOJ and third party contractors play administrative F. illegally. Note: the Truth was in the 2018 Transmittal record. Judge Amy. B. Jackson, the Deep State VA Attorneys, DOJ and etc had one option because of the WESTFALL Act, the option was to settle but no, what they did was (1) ignore the rule of law, (2) set us up to do jail time, (3) deny us basic GOD given rights, (4) Deny us due process and etc. This is what Admin F looks like played be the deep state. They willfully cause legal abuse syndrome which is a crime.
Judges who dont establish SMJ are committing TREASON SueBozgoz
Treason against Americans are happening in our UNITED STATES INC CORRUPT COURTS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES. When this happen, Americans you must sue the Judge and his/her pawns. Use our real time case against the Deep State, VA, Judges, Attorneys and their pawns.
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Gahir & Associates specializes in all aspects of creating, growing, and protecting incorporated businesses. We help you develop an internal structure that is in compliance with all corporate law statutes. Before you make any significant changes or investments, reach out to Gahir & Associates’s finest corporate lawyers. For more details visit here - https://www.gahirlaw.com
THE SHERIFF's Dept cannot give me an order that is a felony SueBozgoz
See hoe the Sheriff's Department attempts to give me, ADA Advocate to cease and desist? He attempted to violate my GOD given rights to protect my ADA clients which is a felony. My solution - QUO WARRANTO. I informed DOD, Sec of Def, Post Commander of the Installation and etc. Treason happens when these corporations ignore the rule of law. Based on their charter, they can no longer exists.
Kangaroo Court is Illegal as it causes Legal Abuse Syndrome SueBozgoz
The document alleges corruption and illegal activities by the United States court system, VA, and law enforcement agencies. It claims they have violated the rights of veterans and elderly citizens through kangaroo courts, illegal entry, theft, false imprisonment, and denial of accommodations. Evidence is provided in links showing coordination between these entities to retaliate against whistleblowers through administrative trickery, backdating documents, and legal abuse. The writer challenges the jurisdiction and void orders of the court, and requests the Department of Defense investigate apparent ongoing criminal activities.
How to survive small claims court presentation 5.15.19Madison Williamson
This document provides information and guidance for individuals filing a claim or defending themselves in small claims court in San Diego County, California. It outlines who can file a claim, monetary limits, required procedures for serving the defendant and notifying the court, what types of evidence and documentation should be brought to trial, and options for collecting on a judgment. The primary goals of small claims court are to provide a low-cost and informal process for resolving civil claims of $10,000 or less.
The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner who entered India after 1971. She provided 11 documents to prove her citizenship but the Tribunal found flaws. It noted discrepancies in names in voter lists from different villages and years. Certificates from village heads were inadmissible without examining authors. Land records did not prove inheritance from parents before 1971. Witnesses could not establish linkage to parents. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's opinion, finding no infirmity in its appreciation of evidence and fulfillment of principles of natural justice. The petition was dismissed.
Amy Jackson - research - the truth still matters - nothing but the facts.pptxSueBozgoz
See how Deep States VA Attorneys in Building 810, Judge Amy B.Jackson, DOJ and third party contractors play administrative F. illegally. Note: the Truth was in the 2018 Transmittal record. Judge Amy. B. Jackson, the Deep State VA Attorneys, DOJ and etc had one option because of the WESTFALL Act, the option was to settle but no, what they did was (1) ignore the rule of law, (2) set us up to do jail time, (3) deny us basic GOD given rights, (4) Deny us due process and etc. This is what Admin F looks like played be the deep state. They willfully cause legal abuse syndrome which is a crime.
Judges who dont establish SMJ are committing TREASON SueBozgoz
Treason against Americans are happening in our UNITED STATES INC CORRUPT COURTS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES. When this happen, Americans you must sue the Judge and his/her pawns. Use our real time case against the Deep State, VA, Judges, Attorneys and their pawns.
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Gahir & Associates specializes in all aspects of creating, growing, and protecting incorporated businesses. We help you develop an internal structure that is in compliance with all corporate law statutes. Before you make any significant changes or investments, reach out to Gahir & Associates’s finest corporate lawyers. For more details visit here - https://www.gahirlaw.com
THE SHERIFF's Dept cannot give me an order that is a felony SueBozgoz
See hoe the Sheriff's Department attempts to give me, ADA Advocate to cease and desist? He attempted to violate my GOD given rights to protect my ADA clients which is a felony. My solution - QUO WARRANTO. I informed DOD, Sec of Def, Post Commander of the Installation and etc. Treason happens when these corporations ignore the rule of law. Based on their charter, they can no longer exists.
When the United States Inc Corporations go Rogue ask the military to do its job SueBozgoz
When the United States Inc corporations go rogue (Justice System, Sheriff's Departments, Jails, Prisons) ask DOD to do their job. Here see two of my ADA clients (Bradly and Shaunel) reach for justice. Brand is dealing with Kangaroo Court in HIllsborough, FL with Judge Margaret Taylor, Judge Jefferey Rich, Judge Micheal Williams and etc) while Shaunel Burt is in the Washington State Prison (NOTE SHE WAS SEX TRAFFICKED at the age of 16) She was tricked into going to GUAM. They (WHITE BUSINESSMEN) took her passport. Long story short, she defended herself against her pimp. She was not going to WORK anymore. She shot him with his own gun. Her mother attended the trial. The Judge said she was TOO Late. Shaunel was sentenced to the Washington State Women's facility. They have been experimenting on her. She along with 60 other inmates to the COVID Vaccine shots. They became Magnets!!! The Doctors told Shaunel to take a MRI after they examined her with two other inmates together violating the medical privacy. Long story short, I got involved and told the military that the WA STATE WOMEN's Correction facility are committing war crimes on my cousin, Shaunel. I intervened Shaunel to our QUO WARRANTO to protector her because her life is in danger. When I contacted the women's facility on or about 7 Nov 2022, I told them that my name is LTC Bozgoz and I was turning them into DOD because the last time I checked experimenting on Americans during war, was a war crime. The real question is how much did the facility get paid to experiment on Americans by the drug company.
Courtroom Observation, Liberty UniversityBy ozwitch01 Studymode.co.docxfaithxdunce63732
Courtroom Observation, Liberty UniversityBy ozwitch01 | Studymode.com
Darlene E.B Hines
Professor Hudson
BUSI 301 Fall
September 22, 2013
Courtroom Observation:
2008 1L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law, White V. Gibbs CA# -8776-CV285.
This case is between the (plaintiff) Mrs. White and the (defendants) Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C. as O’Malley’s Tavern. A Motion of Summary Judgment on behalf of O’Malley’s Tavern in the US District Court of Northern District of Indiana. Is being argued/presented.
Briefly; Mrs. White is suing the defendant Patrick Gibbs of O’Malley’s Tavern where as the bartender served Mr. Hard with alcoholic beverages which lead to his intoxication, thus getting into his vehicle, driving erratic chasing both Mrs. White and her husband (Bruno), striking their vehicle in the side, causing physical injuries to Mrs. White and killing her husband Mr. White.
The defendants are filing a Motion of Summary Judgment to resolve the lawsuit in their favor, whereas the plaintiff does not want the Motion of Summary Judgment granted and the lawsuit to go to trial with jury to recover damages from the defendants.
The lawyers for the defendants are: Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. As the Motion of Summary Judgment is being heard/presented by the dependents their attorneys will go first.
1. Attorney Benjamin Walton is arguing there is no evidence of “Actual Knowledge of Visible Intoxicfication” and that the court should grant this motion. The bartender (Mr. John Daniels) of O’Malley’s though charged 13 drinks to Mr. Hard’s account and yes did see Mr. Hard drink 11 of the beverages in a short period of time but, at no time' during the service did the bartender have “Actual Knowledge of Visible Intoxification” of Mr. Hard's under the Indiana’s Dram Shop Act, Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. Even though he tried to hit Mr. White on their leaving the establishment, lost his balance and fell. Mr. Hard was able to get up by himself with no assistance to his car was required. This was addressed due to the question of the Ashlock Vs Norris case where assistance was required to get to her car, but again. Mr. Hard was able to get up by himself with no assistance to his car was required.. 2. Attorney Jordan Van Meter is arguing that there was no “proximate causation evidence” under the same Dram Shop act. The plaintiff is a victim of a crime not proximate cause based on intoxication of the injury. The facts presented were based on previous pre-existing criminal acts of Mr. Hard to cause harm to Mr. White. This is based on his break-up of his fiancée and her marriage to Mr. White. Where as he started to drink in excessive, receiving OWI’s , his statement of “she is to be my wife” the position of his car and his willful wanted malicious criminal act as in: Fast Eddie’s Vs Hall, it is superseding cause to proximate cause. Showing intent sho.
This document is a court order regarding an application for suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of an appeal. The appellant has appealed his conviction for rape under false promise of marriage. The appellant's lawyer argues there are flaws in the prosecution's evidence and the trial court failed to consider crucial evidence favoring the appellant. The prosecution opposes bail, arguing the complainant was misled by a promise of marriage. The court notes some issues raised by the appellant require deeper scrutiny and consideration. While not reassessing evidence, the court finds infirmities pointed out need review. Considering these factors, the court is inclined to grant bail to the appellant pending the appeal's disposal.
1
2
How the Court Address or Respect our Rights as Citizens Part 1
How the Court Address or Respect our Rights as Citizens Part 1
a. Summary of Case
Gideon vs. wainwright remains to be one of the most infamous supreme court cases in Judicia history. This Supreme Court case declared that defendants charged with a felony must be provided with a court-appointed attorney by the States. Initially, the Litigation was known as Gideon v. Cochran, but when it reached the Supreme Court, the title changed to Gideon vs. wainwright (Oyez, 2018). This happened due to the replacement of the director of Florida's Division of Corrections from Cochran to Louie Lee Wainwright.
The case commenced when Clarence Earl Gideon was in 1961 charged with a felony for purportedly burgling a Pool Hall in Panama City, FL, and stole some money. Gideon was a poor man, and during his first trial, he requested the Court to appoint an attorney who would represent him. Gideons requests were refuted despite not having the capacity to select a lawyer for himself. The prosecutors had witnesses who had seen Gideon at the crime scene. However, he had not been seen committing the crime (Oyez, 2018). The court ruling sentenced Gideon to five years imprisonment despite the lack of concrete evidence. Gideon considered the detention as unjust and filed a petition to the Florida Supreme court. His claims in the petition were that he did not have an attorney general to defend him during the trial, which made it unconstitutional.
Gideon's petition for a writ of habeas corpus from the Supreme Court of Florida was accepted. The judicial system had denied Gideon his 6th amendment rights. In 1963, the case was reassessed, and the Supreme Court ruled out that the judgment that had earlier been made to Gideon was unconstitutional (Greenberg & Page, 2018). The Court ruled that all defendants need to have the assistance of Counsel in their defense, and Gideon was thus set free.
b. Case Outline
1. Title: Gideon vs. wainwright (1963)
2. Facts of the Case
Clarence Earl Gideon was an eighth-grade dropout who had run away from home when he was in the middle class. He was a drifter who spent most of his time in and out of prison. He was charged with a lawful offense of breaking into a Pool room in Florida (Oyez, 2018). He appeared in Court without legal Counsel and requested the Court to appoint one for him. His request was denied. Back then, a lawyer would only be given to an indigent offender in capital cases. The defendant was forced to represent himself in Court, where he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison (Oyez, 2018). Clarence Earl Gideon appealed his case again to the Supreme Court of the United States. The case was reviewed and resolved.
3. History of the case
Clarence Earl Gideon was found guilty and was sentenced to five years in prison (Oyez, 2018).
4. Legal Questions
The Court needed to determine whether Clarence Earl Gideon was guilty or innocent. If found ...
12How the Court Address or Respect our Rights asEttaBenton28
This summary provides an overview of the key points from the document:
The document discusses the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, which established that states are required under the Sixth Amendment to provide legal counsel to criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney. It summarizes the facts of the case, in which Clarence Earl Gideon was denied legal representation and subsequently convicted, and the Supreme Court's ruling that Gideon's conviction was unconstitutional since he did not have legal counsel. The case set the precedent that all criminal defendants have the right to an attorney regardless of their ability to pay.
See how the Deep States uses Pawns like GS 14 Voncelle James SueBozgoz
This document outlines how government attorneys allegedly set up whistleblowers using manufactured evidence and courts. It claims the objective is to delay, deny, and dismiss legal cases, put people in jail, and prevent exposure of crimes. The agenda then lists dates of interactions with government agencies and courts regarding a peace order and criminal case, implying they were unfairly targeted for whistleblowing. It authorizes the release of medical records to the person's ADA representative and appoints them as their ADA and legal representative.
Application for Written Arguments for the date of hearing on 31.10.2022 in An...Om Prakash Poddar
Arguments e-filed on 15.10.2022 to maintain and admit Last Anti-Prostitution Matter Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 fixed for hearing on 31.10.2022 before Supreme Court of India.
(1) The document outlines a legal dispute between SMLLC v Redmond et al from October 1, 2002 to October 22, 2002 regarding a commercial lease.
(2) It describes how the plaintiffs, David Chatfield and Stephen Gaggero, aggressively pursued legal action against the defendants, John and Maureen Redmond, through tactics like last minute filings and ambiguous notifications that put the defendants at a disadvantage.
(3) The defendants argue that the plaintiffs' actions were unnecessarily malicious and financially damaging given the relatively simple nature of the underlying landlord-tenant dispute that could have been resolved without legal action.
Umar Khalid RBR18102022CRLA1732022_143522.pdfsabrangsabrang
The document summarizes a court judgment regarding an appeal filed by Umar Khalid seeking bail in a case related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The trial court had previously rejected Khalid's bail application, finding the charges against him to be prima facie true. In this appeal judgment, the court discusses the background of the case, the charges against Khalid, arguments made by both sides, and inconsistencies claimed in witness statements by Khalid's lawyer. The court will consider whether the trial court order rejecting bail was correct or if bail should now be granted to Khalid.
The court document discusses suspending the sentence of the appellant Babu Lal, who had been sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for offenses under the POCSO Act and IPC against his daughter. While the appellant has served over 7 years of his sentence, his appeal case was not likely to be heard soon. The court decides to suspend the appellant's remaining sentence subject to several conditions to prevent contact with his wife and daughter.
Gahir Law is one of the top law firms in Mississauga, Ontario, Brampton, Toronto, Hamilton in Canada. In our law office, get assistance from our lawyer to help you in licence appeal tribunal law, administrative law, professional regulation disciplinary law, commercial land development mediator arbitrator law, corporate law, Immigration related cases. For more details visit here - https://www.gahirlaw.com
Written Arguments for Anti Prostitution Matter on 31.10.2022 before Supreme C...Om Prakash Poddar
Present writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution, has been filed by the victim father of unseen minor daughter, viz., Shri Om Prakash for the issuance of appropriate writs or direction(s) of like nature against the respondents herein for the protection of his minor daughter who has been kidnapped on 15.04.2005 while she was inside the womb of her mother Reena Kumari (Guddi) age about 40 years from the rented house of Judge’s driver Mr. Pappu Yadav and Mr. Brajesh Yadav R/O Gali No. 12, Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony, Palam Village Police Station, New Delhi-110077.
The grievance in the said writ petition is that after kidnapping his pregnant wife, on the one hand Petitioner is being pulled in the abuse of court process at Dwarka Court, Patiala House Court, Delhi High Court, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi and Begusarai Court, Patna High Court at Bihar and on the other hand sexual abuse of his families continued secretly by the State. For the first, Petitioner has caught his families into the mud of prostitution and illicit sex trade on 05.04.2021 at Shastri Park North East Delhi, which has resulted in W.P.(Criminal) No. 242/2021 before this Hon’ble Court. After identification of illicit sex trade of his families, Petitioner has submitted several written reports since then to till date every day before the officer in-charge of the police station concerned along with the concerned higher Police authorities of NCT of Delhi and State of Bihar who did not take any action on the same and did not register an FIR to recover the minor daughter. Moreover, steps were not taken either for apprehending the accused or for the recovery of the minor girl child.
Patton Boggs legal opinion explanation Steven Canady StevenCanady2017
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is an international law firm with offices in 21 countries. In 2010, the District Attorney in Carroll County, Georgia filed theft charges against Steven Canady involving a disputed financing transaction. The allegations were typically a civil matter. In 2014, Mr. Canady agreed to enter an Alford plea to resolve the case, acknowledging a local jury would likely find him guilty, even though he maintained his innocence. The District Attorney did not actively prosecute the case and did not seek confinement, indicating a lack of factual basis for fraud allegations. By reimbursing the alleged victims' investments, all charges against Mr. Canady will be set aside.
Written Arguments dated 17.10.2022 in Anti Prostitution Matter before SC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution, has been filed by the victim father of unseen minor daughter, viz., Shri Om Prakash for the issuance of appropriate writs or direction(s) of like nature against the respondents herein for the protection of his minor daughter who has been kidnapped on 15.04.2005 while she was inside the womb of her mother Reena Kumari (Guddi) age about 40 years from the rented house of Judge’s driver Mr. Pappu Yadav and Mr. Brajesh Yadav R/O Gali No. 12, Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony, Palam Village Police Station, New Delhi-110077. The grievance in the said writ petition is that after kidnapping his pregnant wife, on the one hand Petitioner is being pulled in the abuse of court process at Dwarka Court, Patiala House Court, Delhi High Court, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi and Begusarai Court, Patna High Court at Bihar and on the other hand sexual abuse of his families continued secretly by the State. For the first time, Petitioner has caught his families into the mud of prostitution and illicit sex trade on 05.04.2021 at Shastri Park North East Delhi, 11.05.2022 under the jurisdiction of Kadwa Police Station Katihar Bihar, 19.06.2022 under the jurisdiction of Lahori Gate Police Station Delhi-6; which has resulted in W.P.(Criminal) No. 242/2021 and W.P.(Criminal) D. No. 18546/2022 before this Hon’ble Court. After identification of illicit sex trade of his families, Petitioner has submitted several written reports since then to till date every day before the officer in-charge of the police station concerned along with the concerned higher Police authorities of NCT of Delhi and State of Bihar who did not take any action on the same and did not register an FIR to recover the minor daughter. Moreover, steps were not taken either for apprehending the accused or for the recovery of the minor girl child.
Running head business law 1 business law5aryan532920
- Jim and Laura gave Stan $100 as a deposit for a car without signing any documents.
- There was no written contract between the parties that specified the terms of the agreement.
- As a result, Jim and Laura may not be able to prove that Stan agreed to refund the deposit if they did not purchase the car, since oral contracts can be difficult to enforce without evidence.
I observed a circuit court proceeding involving a criminal case. The defendant was charged with assault and the prosecution called witnesses to testify about the alleged assault. The defense cross-examined the witnesses and called the defendant to testify. The judge ultimately found the defendant guilty based on the evidence presented.
RTI dated 7.12.22 against suppression of Gang Rape matter.pdfOmPrakashPoddar1
Supreme Court of India is main accused in Non Bail able Warrant and Gang Rape matter W.P.(Crl.) D.NO. 18546/2022. Sixteen petitions (SLP. Writ, Review, Curative and M.A) have been filed against interlinked with this matter since 2012 to till date, yet no rescue of 18 year ago kidnapped pregnant wife Rina Kumari (Guddi) and abducted unseen minor daughter from the clutches of sex Abusers State by Supreme Court of India and Union of India as on date
John and Maureen Redmond provided loans totaling $68,520 to their daughter Geraldine from 2001-2002 to help keep her horse boarding business afloat. In October 2002, the business failed and Stephen Gaggero, one of the owners, initiated legal action against the Redmonds. This led to bank account seizures and liens on their house, leaving them without funds. They hired multiple lawyers over the next two years to defend themselves but incurred substantial legal fees. Despite a $25,209 settlement offer in January 2003, the legal battle continued draining their financial and personal resources until Geraldine filed for bankruptcy protection in September 2003.
060468 rr law and the judicial system assignmentshomeworkecrater
This document contains a 20-question multiple choice test on various aspects of law and the judicial system. The questions cover topics like alternative dispute resolution methods, civil procedure, jurisdiction, precedents, constitutional law, and more. Sample questions ask about the differences between mediation, arbitration and mediation-arbitration (med-arb); when a case can be removed from state to federal court; what provision of the Constitution citizen rights are found in; and what type of ADR would be well-suited to a dispute between a factory and environmental group.
The document discusses how the "United States Inc Pedo Corporation" harms Americans and violates their rights in order to generate money and power. It alleges the corporation controls the justice system, military, healthcare, benefits systems, media and more to oppress people and commit crimes like human trafficking, medical experimentation in prisons, and denial of veterans' benefits. Tactics said to generate money include deception, controlling government agencies and leaders, profiting from wars and contracts, exploiting vulnerable groups, and abusing the court system. The document aims to expose these alleged criminal activities and abuses of power.
Quo Warranto Update 22 Nov 2022 Shaunel .pdfSueBozgoz
Quo Warranto when Shaunel Burt intervened as per TITLES II and III ref: the COVID VACCINE and Washington State Correction Agency experimenting on Americans which is a war crime.
More Related Content
Similar to Criminals- Get out of my HOUSE without a.pptx
When the United States Inc Corporations go Rogue ask the military to do its job SueBozgoz
When the United States Inc corporations go rogue (Justice System, Sheriff's Departments, Jails, Prisons) ask DOD to do their job. Here see two of my ADA clients (Bradly and Shaunel) reach for justice. Brand is dealing with Kangaroo Court in HIllsborough, FL with Judge Margaret Taylor, Judge Jefferey Rich, Judge Micheal Williams and etc) while Shaunel Burt is in the Washington State Prison (NOTE SHE WAS SEX TRAFFICKED at the age of 16) She was tricked into going to GUAM. They (WHITE BUSINESSMEN) took her passport. Long story short, she defended herself against her pimp. She was not going to WORK anymore. She shot him with his own gun. Her mother attended the trial. The Judge said she was TOO Late. Shaunel was sentenced to the Washington State Women's facility. They have been experimenting on her. She along with 60 other inmates to the COVID Vaccine shots. They became Magnets!!! The Doctors told Shaunel to take a MRI after they examined her with two other inmates together violating the medical privacy. Long story short, I got involved and told the military that the WA STATE WOMEN's Correction facility are committing war crimes on my cousin, Shaunel. I intervened Shaunel to our QUO WARRANTO to protector her because her life is in danger. When I contacted the women's facility on or about 7 Nov 2022, I told them that my name is LTC Bozgoz and I was turning them into DOD because the last time I checked experimenting on Americans during war, was a war crime. The real question is how much did the facility get paid to experiment on Americans by the drug company.
Courtroom Observation, Liberty UniversityBy ozwitch01 Studymode.co.docxfaithxdunce63732
Courtroom Observation, Liberty UniversityBy ozwitch01 | Studymode.com
Darlene E.B Hines
Professor Hudson
BUSI 301 Fall
September 22, 2013
Courtroom Observation:
2008 1L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law, White V. Gibbs CA# -8776-CV285.
This case is between the (plaintiff) Mrs. White and the (defendants) Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C. as O’Malley’s Tavern. A Motion of Summary Judgment on behalf of O’Malley’s Tavern in the US District Court of Northern District of Indiana. Is being argued/presented.
Briefly; Mrs. White is suing the defendant Patrick Gibbs of O’Malley’s Tavern where as the bartender served Mr. Hard with alcoholic beverages which lead to his intoxication, thus getting into his vehicle, driving erratic chasing both Mrs. White and her husband (Bruno), striking their vehicle in the side, causing physical injuries to Mrs. White and killing her husband Mr. White.
The defendants are filing a Motion of Summary Judgment to resolve the lawsuit in their favor, whereas the plaintiff does not want the Motion of Summary Judgment granted and the lawsuit to go to trial with jury to recover damages from the defendants.
The lawyers for the defendants are: Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. As the Motion of Summary Judgment is being heard/presented by the dependents their attorneys will go first.
1. Attorney Benjamin Walton is arguing there is no evidence of “Actual Knowledge of Visible Intoxicfication” and that the court should grant this motion. The bartender (Mr. John Daniels) of O’Malley’s though charged 13 drinks to Mr. Hard’s account and yes did see Mr. Hard drink 11 of the beverages in a short period of time but, at no time' during the service did the bartender have “Actual Knowledge of Visible Intoxification” of Mr. Hard's under the Indiana’s Dram Shop Act, Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. Even though he tried to hit Mr. White on their leaving the establishment, lost his balance and fell. Mr. Hard was able to get up by himself with no assistance to his car was required. This was addressed due to the question of the Ashlock Vs Norris case where assistance was required to get to her car, but again. Mr. Hard was able to get up by himself with no assistance to his car was required.. 2. Attorney Jordan Van Meter is arguing that there was no “proximate causation evidence” under the same Dram Shop act. The plaintiff is a victim of a crime not proximate cause based on intoxication of the injury. The facts presented were based on previous pre-existing criminal acts of Mr. Hard to cause harm to Mr. White. This is based on his break-up of his fiancée and her marriage to Mr. White. Where as he started to drink in excessive, receiving OWI’s , his statement of “she is to be my wife” the position of his car and his willful wanted malicious criminal act as in: Fast Eddie’s Vs Hall, it is superseding cause to proximate cause. Showing intent sho.
This document is a court order regarding an application for suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of an appeal. The appellant has appealed his conviction for rape under false promise of marriage. The appellant's lawyer argues there are flaws in the prosecution's evidence and the trial court failed to consider crucial evidence favoring the appellant. The prosecution opposes bail, arguing the complainant was misled by a promise of marriage. The court notes some issues raised by the appellant require deeper scrutiny and consideration. While not reassessing evidence, the court finds infirmities pointed out need review. Considering these factors, the court is inclined to grant bail to the appellant pending the appeal's disposal.
1
2
How the Court Address or Respect our Rights as Citizens Part 1
How the Court Address or Respect our Rights as Citizens Part 1
a. Summary of Case
Gideon vs. wainwright remains to be one of the most infamous supreme court cases in Judicia history. This Supreme Court case declared that defendants charged with a felony must be provided with a court-appointed attorney by the States. Initially, the Litigation was known as Gideon v. Cochran, but when it reached the Supreme Court, the title changed to Gideon vs. wainwright (Oyez, 2018). This happened due to the replacement of the director of Florida's Division of Corrections from Cochran to Louie Lee Wainwright.
The case commenced when Clarence Earl Gideon was in 1961 charged with a felony for purportedly burgling a Pool Hall in Panama City, FL, and stole some money. Gideon was a poor man, and during his first trial, he requested the Court to appoint an attorney who would represent him. Gideons requests were refuted despite not having the capacity to select a lawyer for himself. The prosecutors had witnesses who had seen Gideon at the crime scene. However, he had not been seen committing the crime (Oyez, 2018). The court ruling sentenced Gideon to five years imprisonment despite the lack of concrete evidence. Gideon considered the detention as unjust and filed a petition to the Florida Supreme court. His claims in the petition were that he did not have an attorney general to defend him during the trial, which made it unconstitutional.
Gideon's petition for a writ of habeas corpus from the Supreme Court of Florida was accepted. The judicial system had denied Gideon his 6th amendment rights. In 1963, the case was reassessed, and the Supreme Court ruled out that the judgment that had earlier been made to Gideon was unconstitutional (Greenberg & Page, 2018). The Court ruled that all defendants need to have the assistance of Counsel in their defense, and Gideon was thus set free.
b. Case Outline
1. Title: Gideon vs. wainwright (1963)
2. Facts of the Case
Clarence Earl Gideon was an eighth-grade dropout who had run away from home when he was in the middle class. He was a drifter who spent most of his time in and out of prison. He was charged with a lawful offense of breaking into a Pool room in Florida (Oyez, 2018). He appeared in Court without legal Counsel and requested the Court to appoint one for him. His request was denied. Back then, a lawyer would only be given to an indigent offender in capital cases. The defendant was forced to represent himself in Court, where he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison (Oyez, 2018). Clarence Earl Gideon appealed his case again to the Supreme Court of the United States. The case was reviewed and resolved.
3. History of the case
Clarence Earl Gideon was found guilty and was sentenced to five years in prison (Oyez, 2018).
4. Legal Questions
The Court needed to determine whether Clarence Earl Gideon was guilty or innocent. If found ...
12How the Court Address or Respect our Rights asEttaBenton28
This summary provides an overview of the key points from the document:
The document discusses the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, which established that states are required under the Sixth Amendment to provide legal counsel to criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney. It summarizes the facts of the case, in which Clarence Earl Gideon was denied legal representation and subsequently convicted, and the Supreme Court's ruling that Gideon's conviction was unconstitutional since he did not have legal counsel. The case set the precedent that all criminal defendants have the right to an attorney regardless of their ability to pay.
See how the Deep States uses Pawns like GS 14 Voncelle James SueBozgoz
This document outlines how government attorneys allegedly set up whistleblowers using manufactured evidence and courts. It claims the objective is to delay, deny, and dismiss legal cases, put people in jail, and prevent exposure of crimes. The agenda then lists dates of interactions with government agencies and courts regarding a peace order and criminal case, implying they were unfairly targeted for whistleblowing. It authorizes the release of medical records to the person's ADA representative and appoints them as their ADA and legal representative.
Application for Written Arguments for the date of hearing on 31.10.2022 in An...Om Prakash Poddar
Arguments e-filed on 15.10.2022 to maintain and admit Last Anti-Prostitution Matter Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 fixed for hearing on 31.10.2022 before Supreme Court of India.
(1) The document outlines a legal dispute between SMLLC v Redmond et al from October 1, 2002 to October 22, 2002 regarding a commercial lease.
(2) It describes how the plaintiffs, David Chatfield and Stephen Gaggero, aggressively pursued legal action against the defendants, John and Maureen Redmond, through tactics like last minute filings and ambiguous notifications that put the defendants at a disadvantage.
(3) The defendants argue that the plaintiffs' actions were unnecessarily malicious and financially damaging given the relatively simple nature of the underlying landlord-tenant dispute that could have been resolved without legal action.
Umar Khalid RBR18102022CRLA1732022_143522.pdfsabrangsabrang
The document summarizes a court judgment regarding an appeal filed by Umar Khalid seeking bail in a case related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The trial court had previously rejected Khalid's bail application, finding the charges against him to be prima facie true. In this appeal judgment, the court discusses the background of the case, the charges against Khalid, arguments made by both sides, and inconsistencies claimed in witness statements by Khalid's lawyer. The court will consider whether the trial court order rejecting bail was correct or if bail should now be granted to Khalid.
The court document discusses suspending the sentence of the appellant Babu Lal, who had been sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for offenses under the POCSO Act and IPC against his daughter. While the appellant has served over 7 years of his sentence, his appeal case was not likely to be heard soon. The court decides to suspend the appellant's remaining sentence subject to several conditions to prevent contact with his wife and daughter.
Gahir Law is one of the top law firms in Mississauga, Ontario, Brampton, Toronto, Hamilton in Canada. In our law office, get assistance from our lawyer to help you in licence appeal tribunal law, administrative law, professional regulation disciplinary law, commercial land development mediator arbitrator law, corporate law, Immigration related cases. For more details visit here - https://www.gahirlaw.com
Written Arguments for Anti Prostitution Matter on 31.10.2022 before Supreme C...Om Prakash Poddar
Present writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution, has been filed by the victim father of unseen minor daughter, viz., Shri Om Prakash for the issuance of appropriate writs or direction(s) of like nature against the respondents herein for the protection of his minor daughter who has been kidnapped on 15.04.2005 while she was inside the womb of her mother Reena Kumari (Guddi) age about 40 years from the rented house of Judge’s driver Mr. Pappu Yadav and Mr. Brajesh Yadav R/O Gali No. 12, Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony, Palam Village Police Station, New Delhi-110077.
The grievance in the said writ petition is that after kidnapping his pregnant wife, on the one hand Petitioner is being pulled in the abuse of court process at Dwarka Court, Patiala House Court, Delhi High Court, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi and Begusarai Court, Patna High Court at Bihar and on the other hand sexual abuse of his families continued secretly by the State. For the first, Petitioner has caught his families into the mud of prostitution and illicit sex trade on 05.04.2021 at Shastri Park North East Delhi, which has resulted in W.P.(Criminal) No. 242/2021 before this Hon’ble Court. After identification of illicit sex trade of his families, Petitioner has submitted several written reports since then to till date every day before the officer in-charge of the police station concerned along with the concerned higher Police authorities of NCT of Delhi and State of Bihar who did not take any action on the same and did not register an FIR to recover the minor daughter. Moreover, steps were not taken either for apprehending the accused or for the recovery of the minor girl child.
Patton Boggs legal opinion explanation Steven Canady StevenCanady2017
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is an international law firm with offices in 21 countries. In 2010, the District Attorney in Carroll County, Georgia filed theft charges against Steven Canady involving a disputed financing transaction. The allegations were typically a civil matter. In 2014, Mr. Canady agreed to enter an Alford plea to resolve the case, acknowledging a local jury would likely find him guilty, even though he maintained his innocence. The District Attorney did not actively prosecute the case and did not seek confinement, indicating a lack of factual basis for fraud allegations. By reimbursing the alleged victims' investments, all charges against Mr. Canady will be set aside.
Written Arguments dated 17.10.2022 in Anti Prostitution Matter before SC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution, has been filed by the victim father of unseen minor daughter, viz., Shri Om Prakash for the issuance of appropriate writs or direction(s) of like nature against the respondents herein for the protection of his minor daughter who has been kidnapped on 15.04.2005 while she was inside the womb of her mother Reena Kumari (Guddi) age about 40 years from the rented house of Judge’s driver Mr. Pappu Yadav and Mr. Brajesh Yadav R/O Gali No. 12, Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony, Palam Village Police Station, New Delhi-110077. The grievance in the said writ petition is that after kidnapping his pregnant wife, on the one hand Petitioner is being pulled in the abuse of court process at Dwarka Court, Patiala House Court, Delhi High Court, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi and Begusarai Court, Patna High Court at Bihar and on the other hand sexual abuse of his families continued secretly by the State. For the first time, Petitioner has caught his families into the mud of prostitution and illicit sex trade on 05.04.2021 at Shastri Park North East Delhi, 11.05.2022 under the jurisdiction of Kadwa Police Station Katihar Bihar, 19.06.2022 under the jurisdiction of Lahori Gate Police Station Delhi-6; which has resulted in W.P.(Criminal) No. 242/2021 and W.P.(Criminal) D. No. 18546/2022 before this Hon’ble Court. After identification of illicit sex trade of his families, Petitioner has submitted several written reports since then to till date every day before the officer in-charge of the police station concerned along with the concerned higher Police authorities of NCT of Delhi and State of Bihar who did not take any action on the same and did not register an FIR to recover the minor daughter. Moreover, steps were not taken either for apprehending the accused or for the recovery of the minor girl child.
Running head business law 1 business law5aryan532920
- Jim and Laura gave Stan $100 as a deposit for a car without signing any documents.
- There was no written contract between the parties that specified the terms of the agreement.
- As a result, Jim and Laura may not be able to prove that Stan agreed to refund the deposit if they did not purchase the car, since oral contracts can be difficult to enforce without evidence.
I observed a circuit court proceeding involving a criminal case. The defendant was charged with assault and the prosecution called witnesses to testify about the alleged assault. The defense cross-examined the witnesses and called the defendant to testify. The judge ultimately found the defendant guilty based on the evidence presented.
RTI dated 7.12.22 against suppression of Gang Rape matter.pdfOmPrakashPoddar1
Supreme Court of India is main accused in Non Bail able Warrant and Gang Rape matter W.P.(Crl.) D.NO. 18546/2022. Sixteen petitions (SLP. Writ, Review, Curative and M.A) have been filed against interlinked with this matter since 2012 to till date, yet no rescue of 18 year ago kidnapped pregnant wife Rina Kumari (Guddi) and abducted unseen minor daughter from the clutches of sex Abusers State by Supreme Court of India and Union of India as on date
John and Maureen Redmond provided loans totaling $68,520 to their daughter Geraldine from 2001-2002 to help keep her horse boarding business afloat. In October 2002, the business failed and Stephen Gaggero, one of the owners, initiated legal action against the Redmonds. This led to bank account seizures and liens on their house, leaving them without funds. They hired multiple lawyers over the next two years to defend themselves but incurred substantial legal fees. Despite a $25,209 settlement offer in January 2003, the legal battle continued draining their financial and personal resources until Geraldine filed for bankruptcy protection in September 2003.
060468 rr law and the judicial system assignmentshomeworkecrater
This document contains a 20-question multiple choice test on various aspects of law and the judicial system. The questions cover topics like alternative dispute resolution methods, civil procedure, jurisdiction, precedents, constitutional law, and more. Sample questions ask about the differences between mediation, arbitration and mediation-arbitration (med-arb); when a case can be removed from state to federal court; what provision of the Constitution citizen rights are found in; and what type of ADR would be well-suited to a dispute between a factory and environmental group.
Similar to Criminals- Get out of my HOUSE without a.pptx (20)
The document discusses how the "United States Inc Pedo Corporation" harms Americans and violates their rights in order to generate money and power. It alleges the corporation controls the justice system, military, healthcare, benefits systems, media and more to oppress people and commit crimes like human trafficking, medical experimentation in prisons, and denial of veterans' benefits. Tactics said to generate money include deception, controlling government agencies and leaders, profiting from wars and contracts, exploiting vulnerable groups, and abusing the court system. The document aims to expose these alleged criminal activities and abuses of power.
Quo Warranto Update 22 Nov 2022 Shaunel .pdfSueBozgoz
Quo Warranto when Shaunel Burt intervened as per TITLES II and III ref: the COVID VACCINE and Washington State Correction Agency experimenting on Americans which is a war crime.
Signature page for main claim and QUO WARRANTO right DOD as everything is on the record. They use contract law and I paid for justice. To deny us justice interference with Interstate Commerce.
Challenge VA's fake Kangaroo Court with Judge Michael Williams as Baby Clerk Cindy Stuart is signing void summons again while VA attorney is illegally dismissing Bradley from 4 Nov FAKE KANGAROO COURT. See docket which states Bradley was a no show. The records are void.
Request findings of the facts sent to Judge Margaret Taylor - She refused to find the facts. When she ignores the facts, she is no longer a judge. She is committing Treason upon the court.
#2 Declaration of ADA Client and ADA Advocate abuse.pdfSueBozgoz
Quo Warranto when the United States Inc goes rogue. Use our update case against the Deep States, Justice System and WA State Prison system as everything is a game, a rich man's game. Do you know how they play their game using the justice system? Its not by accident we AMERICANS have the most jails/prisons in the world. See how they play us using our real time RICO case against them also see the hard evidence at: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Kh8Q2qNGM73V/
Quo Warranto when the United States Inc goes rogue. Use our update case against the Deep States, Justice System and WA State Prison system as everything is a game, a rich man's game. Do you know how they play their game using the justice system? Its not by accident we AMERICANS have the most jails/prisons in the world. See how they play us using our real time RICO case against them also see the hard evidence at: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Kh8Q2qNGM73V/
#2 Americans know what Subject Matter Jurisdiction is before going to court a...SueBozgoz
The document discusses the importance of subject matter jurisdiction in courts. It states that subject matter jurisdiction is essential for a court to lawfully exercise power over a case. It notes that jurisdiction can be challenged at any point in litigation and if a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, its rulings are void. The document emphasizes that the burden is on the plaintiff to prove the court has subject matter jurisdiction and if jurisdiction is questioned, the plaintiff must provide evidence from the record to establish it.
#1 Americans know what SMJ is before going to court as it is everything SueBozgoz
#1 Americans know what Subject Matter Jurisdiction is before going to court as it is everything. The issue today is we AMERICANS are being played by the entire justice system to include the Jail & Prison System. To make matters worse, the Prisons are experimenting on Americans illegally. Follow our real time RICO case against the DEEP STATE see: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/WTXWnbl8YhXG/
Corruption in the United States INC ref: COVID VACCINES, COURTS AND JUSTICE S...SueBozgoz
Follow our real time RICO Case against the United States Inc Corporation. Just remember this: THE UNITED STATES INC is a Corporation IT IS NOT A COUNTRY. Use our real time case. Look at the facts and the patterns. Facts and patterns never lie, people do. Use our real time case and come up with your own solution. We use my ADA clients and show Americans how we Americans are being used by the United States Inc Corporation. Once the truth is out, it can never be ignored again.
The Secret of the Legal Industry - Understand how they play Americans.pptxSueBozgoz
Know the United State Inc's games. Focus on SMJ as courts get their authority from one source and only one source which is pleadings sufficient to empower the court to act meaning one of the parties must give the court its power to act by way of written and oral argument (the parties not their attorneys or prosecutor must do this. BLUF: if one of these things are not in the court room, the judge must dismiss the case (1) THE Plaintiff, (2) THE Defendant, (3) A competent fact witness, (4) The reason why you are being sued. The Plaintiff not the Defendant, Judge, Prosecutor, or Attorney must give the judge authority or prove SMJ. If She/He cannot, the Judge must dismiss the case. The issue in America, is they (THE JUSTICE SYSTEM) are making the plaintiff, whistleblower, and victims into the Criminals that THEY ARE by using manufactured facts, perjury and gaslighting). THIS IS the RICH MAN'S games to fill the FOR PROFIT jails in America. The jails and prisons are experimenting on Americans then hiding their crimes. Use our real time RICO case and see what they are doing at the WASHINGTON STATE CORRECTION FACILITY ON OUR AMERICAN WOMEN RIGHT NOW. They are using the COVID VACCINE on 60 women. My Cousin is one of them. We have had evidence that the Covid VACCINE is an experimental drug and causing Americans to become MAGNETIC. See also https://www.bitchute.com/channel/WTXWnbl8YhXG/
When the United States Inc violates your GOD GIVEN RIGHTS - RELIEF IS MANDATORYSueBozgoz
Americans understand your GOD GIVEN NATURAL RIGHTS AND WHAT Subject Matter Jurisdiction is. SMJ is everything and the UNITED STATE INC's game is - NOT TO ESTABLISH SMJ. Bottom line: They are filling jails as everything in America is about BUSINESS.
Kangaroo Court Continues as SMJ is everything.pptxSueBozgoz
Legal Abuse Syndrome is a caused mainly by a corrupt Judge note establishing Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Note: Americans understand what SMJ is as it is everything. When a judge does not establish SMJ it is never too late to go back and sue them for crimes against humanity. There is a cure for corruption in the court rooms, it is called exposure.
DOD - The Sheriff’s Department has an illegal.pptxSueBozgoz
The document discusses allegations against the United States government and corporations, claiming they are violating human rights and committing war crimes through illegal human experimentation and child sex trafficking. It references supporting documents and calls on the Department of Defense to investigate these alleged crimes. The purpose is to prove the US is run by a foreign pedophile corporation and expose ongoing illegal and unethical experimentation on Americans and prisoners. It discusses facing retaliation for whistleblowing, including false charges and character assassination.
Courts are nothing more but privately owned businesses that play Americans SueBozgoz
This document discusses how all courts operate as private corrupt corporations that target vulnerable groups like children and the elderly. It claims courts use administrative trickery to play Americans. It states that nothing trumps God's natural law and that it all comes down to understanding corporate law. The document lists various government and legal entities it alleges violated the ADA act and denied ADA rights.
The Corrupt Justice System CAN NOT BE FIXED BY THE SYSTEM SueBozgoz
The document discusses the history of oppression and fraudulent laws enacted by the United States Inc. corporation against Americans, including Indigenous peoples and Blacks. It provides examples of laws and documents from the 17th century to modern day that violate natural God-given law, such as the Doctrine of Discovery, Cestui Que Trust Act, Negro Act of 1740, and residential school investigations. The document claims the United States Inc. was designed by Nazis and traitors like Edward House to harm Americans for the benefit of banks and corporations. It asserts that the United States Inc. is not a legitimate country but a destructive pedophile corporation.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Criminals- Get out of my HOUSE without a.pptx
1. Criminals- Get out of my
HOUSE without a warrant
• Hillsborough – If you are going to be a criminal, don’t be a dumb criminal – BUSTED - WE SEE YOU.
2. More Defendants to add to our
RICO/Crimes against humanity case –
COME ON DOWN!!!
3. True TIMELINE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES INC,
VA, HILLSBOROUGH SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT AND
TAMPA 13 CIRCUIT COURTS PLAYED
Administrative Trickery
which is a crime
4. Timeline
• 4 Aug 2022 Brad files in court against the Oasis at
Brandon, LLC because illegally increasing his rent by
$300.00.
• 8 Aug 2022 Defendant files motion for default
Judgement in retaliation. (e.g., the VA, Oasis at
Brandon, Tampa Court, Clerks, Attorneys and
Sheriff’s Department retaliate against Brad) using:
• Entering Brad’s house without a warrant (31
Aug)
• Denying Brad ADA Reasonable Accommodation
• Stealing Brad’s personal items
• Stealing Brad’s car
• Arresting Brad
• Making Brad go to Kangaroo Court/VA Court
• Playing Administrative Trickery
• 8 Aug to date: the Defendants retaliated
mainly by:
• back dating documents, using
• The Sheriff’s Department
• The Courts
• VA
• Court Clerks
• Jail
• Causing Legal Abuse Syndrome which is a crime
5.
6. Timeline
• 4 Aug 2022 Brad files in court against the Oasis at Brandon, LLC because illegally increasing his rent by $300.00.
• 8 Aug 2022 the VA, Oasis at Brandon, Tampa Court, Clerks, Attorneys and Sheriff’s Department retaliate against Brad using:
• Entering Brad’s house without a warrant (31 Aug)
• Denying Brad ADA Reasonable Accommodation
• Stealing Brad’s personal items
• Arresting Brad
• Making Brad go to Kangaroo Court/VA Court
• Playing Administrative Trickery
• 8 Aug to date: the Defendants retaliated mainly by preplanning Brad’s illegal TRESPASSING/Eviction by:
• Back dating documents, using
• Attorney E-filing
• Hillsborough Sheriffs Department
• Tampa 13 Circuit Court
• Court Clerks fake summons for VA and Tampa
• Hillsborough Jail
• Denying ADA RA
• Denying Mediation
• Offering wrong Meds (Blood Pressure Meds)
7. Timeline
• 4 Aug 2022 Brad files in court against the Oasis at Brandon, LLC because illegally increasing his rent by $300.00.
• 16 Aug 2022 (Fake Summons signed by unknown judge without signature block)
• 19 Aug 2022 (Apartment files against Brad in retaliation)
• 26 Aug 2022 (Brad files to stay the fake eviction filed by the Apartment in retalaltion)
• 31 Aug 2022, Brad gets evicted/arrested without a signed Warrant
• Denied Reasonable Accommodations
• Denied Medical ‘
• Denied his cane
• Released at 10 pm
• Arresting the victim and humiliating them for 3 days is a psyops
• Listed him as black which means dead
• 1 Sep 2022, Sgt Catlin charges $92.40 for the administrative lie. Sgt Catlin states that Brad was served an official final eviction notice see:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/WTXWnbl8YhXG/ He leave out the fact that the Hillsborough police entered his house without a warrant and
when Brad stepped outside, the police locked him out of his house and arrested him and removed all his shit from his house.
• 6 Sep 2022, the State of FL filed charged Bradly for TRESPASSING (see Police Cam and Savannah’s discussion ref: what charges she wanted for
Bradly. This is a misdemeanor but he went to criminal court?
• 17 Oct 2022, Cindy Court Clerk signs summons to attend criminal court at
• (a) Tampa (Margaret Taylor) on 31 Oct 2022.
• (b) VA (Mike Williams) on 4 Nov 2022
8. Signed 4 Aug
2022.
However, look
at the clerk’s
time date
stamp, 16 Aug
2022
That Clerk stamp
and date is wrong.
Brad signed his
affidavit on 4 Aug
not 16 Aug
20. On Sep 6, the State of FL
filed charges against
Bradly for TRESPASSING
(see Police Cam and
Savannah’s discussion
ref: what charges she
wanted for Bradly. This is
a misdemeanor but he
went to criminal court?
21.
22.
23. 8 Aug 2022-The Oasis at
Brandon, LLC D/B/A the
Oasis at Brandon Luxury
Apartment FL, Retaliates
against Brad for filing
against them on 4 Aug
24. James I Barron,
III is a corrupt
attorney and
here is the proof
Can’t retaliate
against a
service- disabled
veteran.
FLA Stat 83.60(2)
FLA Stat 69(2)
(1989)
are not law
29. DOD please kindly add
the following defendants
to our QUO WARRANTO
and major claim
30. This is what administrative
trickery looks like in
Hillsborough/TAMPA
FLORIDA
31. IF you are
going to be a
criminal,
United States
Inc, VA,
Sheriff’s
Department
and 1 percent,
DON’T BE A
DUMB
CRIMINAL
32. The same FL State Clerk is asking Brad to appear in Kangaroo Court in
Tampa and at the VA as a defendant?
33. The Honorable Michael Williams located at VA
ANNEX, 13515 Lake TERRANCE LN, TAMPA, FL
33637
34. Cindy Stuart, Circuit County Court in the Hillsborough County, FL and VA are in bed together. They
issued 2 court hearing. The court on Monday, the Judge DID NOT establish sufficiency of pleading,
lets see what crime the VA Judge will violate tomorrow. We can prove a RICO/18 USC 1341 crime
45. This is fraud too. Look at the date
Brad filed ref: Motion to
determine rent – 4 Aug 2022 (see
last page). If this is a fact, why did
the corrupt clerk of circuit court
time stamp it on 22 Aug 2022?
49. Proof Brad overpaid
the apartment
complex 300 then
told them in June to
get it together
when corporate
refused to talk to
him
50.
51.
52. This is what fraud looks like - The certificate date 4th Aug 2022
and the Clerk of Circuit Court 22 Aug 2022 don’t match.
53. Don’t fall for the
manipulation aka the rich
man’s game. In United States
Inc., it’s all about BUSINESS
54. Fabricated document signed by the circuit county court of the 13th Judicial Circuit on 4 AUG (4 days
before Savanah and her attorney filed, 8 Aug 2022) , In and for Hillsborough County, FL deputy clerk
Wrong
date. 4
days too
early
55. Agent for Plaintiff not only lied on her
affidavit, she:
(1) back dated her signature from 8 Aug (4
days after Brad filed his affidavit) to 7/26/22.
(2) She failed to appear in court and allowed
the attorney testify for her.
(3) Office Cam recording stating she was filing
against Brad for Trespassing.
The Oasis at Brandon, LLC D/B/A the Oasis at
Savannah Naour
80. Fabricated documents
from the Hillsborough
Sheriff’s department.
See video – They had
nothing and did not
know where the judges
court documents were
Fraud: This document was filed on
2 Sep vs 24 Aug (see electronic file
date)
84. • ---------- Original Message ----------
From: Sue Bozgoz <margaret.bozgoz@comcast.net>
To: Div Z Felony Drug Court <felonydivz@fljud13.org>, "boldenbrad@yahoo.com" <boldenbrad@yahoo.com>, Raquel Pancho <Raquel.Pancho@tampagov.net>, "TampaADA@tampagov.net" <TampaADA@tampagov.net>,
"Joseph.f.dunford.mil@mail.mil" <Joseph.f.dunford.mil@mail.mil>, "christopher.c.french.mil@mail.mil" <christopher.c.french.mil@mail.mil>, "william.a.schmittel.civ@mail.mil" <william.a.schmittel.civ@mail.mil>,
"mailProcessingStaff@sao13th.com" <mailProcessingStaff@sao13th.com>, Benjamin Fulford <benjaminsfulford@tutanota.com>, "efile@jamesbarronlaw.com" <efile@jamesbarronlaw.com>, "Hcso@hcso.tampa.fl.us"
<Hcso@hcso.tampa.fl.us>
Date: 11/03/2022 7:42 PM
Subject: DOD - Here is more proof that the Hillsborough Courts, Sheriff's Dept, 1 % and VA are retaliating against Americans, focus on BRAD and his fake TAMPA/VA Kangaroo Courts.
DOD
As you know our videos have gone viral ref: the corruption caught on tape in TAMPA/Hillsborough.
Here is more proof that the Hillsborough Courts, Sheriff's Dept, 1 %, Attorneys, Judges, CLERKS and VA are retaliating against Americans, ELDERLY and Service-Disabled Veterans AGAIN. How many more AMERICANS must die,
lose their lives, go to jail and etc. before you do your job?
BLUF these traitors are caught on tape, video and audio committing crimes, Manipulating documents, entering homes with fake Judge Orders [or not,] committing CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and etc.
THESE traitors are CORRUPT AS HELL, and their SCAM needs to be investigated. I have given you years of hard evidence. What I request is focus what they did to BRAD. . THEIR SCAM is predictable and reoccurring. WE
demand that you freeze their assets and send their asses to GITMO. They do not deserve to collect tax dollars and play us.
Also, I will be filing a supplement to my main claim under Titles II and III of the new defendants. We will be suing them in their individual and official capacity because they know better. The Defendants are:
(1) Hillsborough Sheriff's Department. See attached Slides
(2) Attorney James I Barron and LAW OFFICES OF JAMES I BARRON III, 121 S Orange Ave, Suite 1500
(3) The OASIS AT BRANDON, LLC D/B/A THE OASIS AT BRANDON LUXURY APARTMENT HOMES and their Agent. Their agent's name is:
(4) Savannah Nadur.
Savannah's associates to harm my ADA Client in violation of 18 USC 241, 242, 42 USC 1983, 1985 and 1986 (failure to prevent) are:
(5) The Honorable Michael Williams
(6) Cindy Stuart, Circuit County Clerk
(7) The Honorable TRAITOR Margaret Taylor of the Criminal Court of Hillsborough
(8) Elgin Welch, Deputy Court Clerk.
DOD, please see attach. Brad is scheduled to go to another fake hearing tomorrow at the VA. Our guess is they will try to put him Jail. We request that you protect him.
More to follow. Please update our claim with the defendant under TITLES II and III. Please also give them their summons due to the death threats on my ADA clients and my family's life and provide Brad protection as he is a
victim who has been violated. NOTE: Savannah coordinated with (1) the Sheriff's department and (2) her attorney to violate Brad. They invaded his privacy, property, arrested him, then had the nerve to steal all his belonging
while his neighbor's watched and captured everything on tape.
v/r
Sue Bozgoz
ADA Advocate
85. Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office (HCSO) - District 3 · 7202 Gunn Hwy, Tampa
2
Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office (HCSO) · 2008 E 8th Ave, Tampa
3
Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office - District I · 14102 N 20th St, Tampa
14102 N 20th St, Tampa, FL 33613
View details
4
Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office · 2310 N Falkenburg Rd, Tampa
5
Hillsborough Sheriff's Department · 307 N Michigan Ave, Plant City
7202 Gunn
2008 E 8th A
86. • 1 Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office (HCSO) - District 3 ·
7202 Gunn Hwy, Tampa
• 2 Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office (HCSO) · 2008 E 8th
Ave, Tampa
• 3 Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office - District I · 14102 N
20th St, Tampa
• 14102 N 20th St, Tampa, FL 33613
• View details
• 4 Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office · 2310 N Falkenburg
Rd, Tampa
• 5 Hillsborough Sheriff's Department · 307 N Michigan Ave,
Plant City