Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Quantum Causal Networks
1. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Conclusions
Quantum Causal Networks: A Quantum
Informationish Approach to Causality in
Quantum Theory
M. S. Leifer
Institute for Quantum Computing
University of Waterloo
Perimeter Institute
Dec. 10th 2007 / Quantum Information in Quantum Gravity
Workshop
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
2. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Conclusions
Outline
Introduction
1
The Markov Evolution Law
2
Quantum Causal Networks
3
Local Positivity: A Lament
4
Conclusions
5
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
3. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Disclaimer!
The author of this presentation makes no claims as to the
accuracy of any speculations about quantum gravity contained
within. Such speculations do not necessarily represent the
views of the author, or indeed any sane person, living or dead.
Any similarity to existing formalisms for theories of quantum
gravity is purely coincidental. The finiteness of all Hilbert
spaces in this presentation does not reflect any views about the
discreteness of spacetime. You can probably do everything with
C ∗ -algebras if you prefer. This is a work in progress.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
4. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
The Church of The Smaller Hilbert Space
Core Beliefs
A preference for density operators, CP-maps and POVMs
over state-vectors, unitary evolution and projective
measurements.
The latter turn out to be fairly boring in the present
framework.
States belong to agents, not to systems.
“Other authors introduce a wave function for the whole
Universe. In this book, I shall refrain from using
concepts that I do not understand.” Peres.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
5. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
The Church of The Smaller Hilbert Space
Core Beliefs
A preference for density operators, CP-maps and POVMs
over state-vectors, unitary evolution and projective
measurements.
The latter turn out to be fairly boring in the present
framework.
States belong to agents, not to systems.
“Other authors introduce a wave function for the whole
Universe. In this book, I shall refrain from using
concepts that I do not understand.” Peres.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
6. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
The Church of The Smaller Hilbert Space
Core Beliefs
A preference for density operators, CP-maps and POVMs
over state-vectors, unitary evolution and projective
measurements.
The latter turn out to be fairly boring in the present
framework.
States belong to agents, not to systems.
“Other authors introduce a wave function for the whole
Universe. In this book, I shall refrain from using
concepts that I do not understand.” Peres.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
7. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
The Church of The Smaller Hilbert Space
Core Beliefs
A preference for density operators, CP-maps and POVMs
over state-vectors, unitary evolution and projective
measurements.
The latter turn out to be fairly boring in the present
framework.
States belong to agents, not to systems.
“Other authors introduce a wave function for the whole
Universe. In this book, I shall refrain from using
concepts that I do not understand.” Peres.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
8. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
The Church of The Smaller Hilbert Space
Core Beliefs
A preference for density operators, CP-maps and POVMs
over state-vectors, unitary evolution and projective
measurements.
The latter turn out to be fairly boring in the present
framework.
States belong to agents, not to systems.
“Other authors introduce a wave function for the whole
Universe. In this book, I shall refrain from using
concepts that I do not understand.” Peres.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
9. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Three lessons from Quantum Information
Quantum Theory is a noncommutative, operator-valued,
1
generalization of probability theory.
We don’t have to invoke gravity in order to encounter
2
scenarios with unusual causal structures.
Causal ordering of events matters a lot less than you might
3
think for describing quantum processes.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
10. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Three lessons from Quantum Information
Quantum Theory is a noncommutative, operator-valued,
1
generalization of probability theory.
We don’t have to invoke gravity in order to encounter
2
scenarios with unusual causal structures.
Causal ordering of events matters a lot less than you might
3
think for describing quantum processes.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
11. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Three lessons from Quantum Information
Quantum Theory is a noncommutative, operator-valued,
1
generalization of probability theory.
We don’t have to invoke gravity in order to encounter
2
scenarios with unusual causal structures.
Causal ordering of events matters a lot less than you might
3
think for describing quantum processes.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
12. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Unusual Causality without Gravity
Quantum Protocols
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
13. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Unusual Causality without Gravity
Quantum Computing
Y Z
W X
U V
Quantum Circuits
Measurement Based Quantum Computing
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
14. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Irrelevance of Causal Ordering
The “small miracle” of time in quantum information
B B A B
C
A A
In all three causal scenarios the predictions can be
calculated from the formula Tr (MA ⊗ MB ρAB ).
This follows from the Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism and
is very useful in qinfo, e.g. crypto security proofs.
c.f. P(X,Y) - I want a formalism in which it is that obvious.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
15. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Irrelevance of Causal Ordering
The “small miracle” of time in quantum information
B B A B
C
A A
In all three causal scenarios the predictions can be
calculated from the formula Tr (MA ⊗ MB ρAB ).
This follows from the Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism and
is very useful in qinfo, e.g. crypto security proofs.
c.f. P(X,Y) - I want a formalism in which it is that obvious.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
16. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Irrelevance of Causal Ordering
The “small miracle” of time in quantum information
B B A B
C
A A
In all three causal scenarios the predictions can be
calculated from the formula Tr (MA ⊗ MB ρAB ).
This follows from the Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism and
is very useful in qinfo, e.g. crypto security proofs.
c.f. P(X,Y) - I want a formalism in which it is that obvious.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
17. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Irrelevance of Causal Ordering
The “small miracle” of time in quantum information
B B A B
C
A A
In all three causal scenarios the predictions can be
calculated from the formula Tr (MA ⊗ MB ρAB ).
This follows from the Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism and
is very useful in qinfo, e.g. crypto security proofs.
c.f. P(X,Y) - I want a formalism in which it is that obvious.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
18. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Related Formalisms
Hardy’s Causaloid gr-qc/0509120, arXiv:gr-qc/0608043.
Consistent/Decoherent Histories - particularly Isham’s
version quant-ph/9506028.
Aharonov et. al.’s mutli-time states arXiv:0712.0320.
Markopoulou’s Quantum Causal Histories hep-th/9904009,
hep-th/0302111.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
19. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Related Formalisms
Hardy’s Causaloid gr-qc/0509120, arXiv:gr-qc/0608043.
Consistent/Decoherent Histories - particularly Isham’s
version quant-ph/9506028.
Aharonov et. al.’s mutli-time states arXiv:0712.0320.
Markopoulou’s Quantum Causal Histories hep-th/9904009,
hep-th/0302111.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
20. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Related Formalisms
Hardy’s Causaloid gr-qc/0509120, arXiv:gr-qc/0608043.
Consistent/Decoherent Histories - particularly Isham’s
version quant-ph/9506028.
Aharonov et. al.’s mutli-time states arXiv:0712.0320.
Markopoulou’s Quantum Causal Histories hep-th/9904009,
hep-th/0302111.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
21. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Related Formalisms
Hardy’s Causaloid gr-qc/0509120, arXiv:gr-qc/0608043.
Consistent/Decoherent Histories - particularly Isham’s
version quant-ph/9506028.
Aharonov et. al.’s mutli-time states arXiv:0712.0320.
Markopoulou’s Quantum Causal Histories hep-th/9904009,
hep-th/0302111.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
22. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Comparison to Quantum Causal Histories
I don’t require global unitarity.
I only deal with finite causal structures.
No free choice of initial conditions.
No free entanglement in the initial state.
Note: Quantum Causal Histories could have been called
Quantum Causal Networks or Quantum Bayesian Networks.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
23. Introduction
Disclaimer
The Markov Evolution Law
Religious Views
Quantum Causal Networks
Lessons from Quantum Information
Local Positivity: A Lament
Related Formalisms
Conclusions
Comparison to Quantum Causal Histories
I don’t require global unitarity.
I only deal with finite causal structures.
No free choice of initial conditions.
No free entanglement in the initial state.
Note: Quantum Causal Histories could have been called
Quantum Causal Networks or Quantum Bayesian Networks.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
24. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
Conditional Density Operators
Definition
A Conditional Density Operator (CDO) ρB|A ∈ L (HA ⊗ HB ) is a
positive operator that satisfies TrB ρB|A = IA , where IA is the
identity operator on HA .
P(Y |X ) = 1
c.f. Y
Note: A density operator determines a CDO via
−1 −1
ρB|A = ρA 2 ρAB ρA 2 .
1 1
Notation: M ∗ N = M 2 NM 2
ρB|A = ρ−1 ∗ ρAB and ρAB = ρA ∗ ρAB .
A
c.f. P(Y |X ) = P(X , Y )/P(X ) and P(X , Y ) = P(X )P(Y |X ).
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
25. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
Conditional Density Operators
Definition
A Conditional Density Operator (CDO) ρB|A ∈ L (HA ⊗ HB ) is a
positive operator that satisfies TrB ρB|A = IA , where IA is the
identity operator on HA .
P(Y |X ) = 1
c.f. Y
Note: A density operator determines a CDO via
−1 −1
ρB|A = ρA 2 ρAB ρA 2 .
1 1
Notation: M ∗ N = M 2 NM 2
ρB|A = ρ−1 ∗ ρAB and ρAB = ρA ∗ ρAB .
A
c.f. P(Y |X ) = P(X , Y )/P(X ) and P(X , Y ) = P(X )P(Y |X ).
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
26. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
Conditional Density Operators
Definition
A Conditional Density Operator (CDO) ρB|A ∈ L (HA ⊗ HB ) is a
positive operator that satisfies TrB ρB|A = IA , where IA is the
identity operator on HA .
P(Y |X ) = 1
c.f. Y
Note: A density operator determines a CDO via
−1 −1
ρB|A = ρA 2 ρAB ρA 2 .
1 1
Notation: M ∗ N = M 2 NM 2
ρB|A = ρ−1 ∗ ρAB and ρAB = ρA ∗ ρAB .
A
c.f. P(Y |X ) = P(X , Y )/P(X ) and P(X , Y ) = P(X )P(Y |X ).
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
27. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
Conditional Density Operators
Definition
A Conditional Density Operator (CDO) ρB|A ∈ L (HA ⊗ HB ) is a
positive operator that satisfies TrB ρB|A = IA , where IA is the
identity operator on HA .
P(Y |X ) = 1
c.f. Y
Note: A density operator determines a CDO via
−1 −1
ρB|A = ρA 2 ρAB ρA 2 .
1 1
Notation: M ∗ N = M 2 NM 2
ρB|A = ρ−1 ∗ ρAB and ρAB = ρA ∗ ρAB .
A
c.f. P(Y |X ) = P(X , Y )/P(X ) and P(X , Y ) = P(X )P(Y |X ).
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
28. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
Conditional Density Operators
Definition
A Conditional Density Operator (CDO) ρB|A ∈ L (HA ⊗ HB ) is a
positive operator that satisfies TrB ρB|A = IA , where IA is the
identity operator on HA .
P(Y |X ) = 1
c.f. Y
Note: A density operator determines a CDO via
−1 −1
ρB|A = ρA 2 ρAB ρA 2 .
1 1
Notation: M ∗ N = M 2 NM 2
ρB|A = ρ−1 ∗ ρAB and ρAB = ρA ∗ ρAB .
A
c.f. P(Y |X ) = P(X , Y )/P(X ) and P(X , Y ) = P(X )P(Y |X ).
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
29. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
Conditional Density Operators
Definition
A Conditional Density Operator (CDO) ρB|A ∈ L (HA ⊗ HB ) is a
positive operator that satisfies TrB ρB|A = IA , where IA is the
identity operator on HA .
P(Y |X ) = 1
c.f. Y
Note: A density operator determines a CDO via
−1 −1
ρB|A = ρA 2 ρAB ρA 2 .
1 1
Notation: M ∗ N = M 2 NM 2
ρB|A = ρ−1 ∗ ρAB and ρAB = ρA ∗ ρAB .
A
c.f. P(Y |X ) = P(X , Y )/P(X ) and P(X , Y ) = P(X )P(Y |X ).
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
30. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
The Partial Transpose
Definition
Given a basis {|j A } of HA and an operator
MAB = jklm Mjk ;lm |jk lm|AB ∈ L (HA ⊗ HB ), the partial
transpose map on system A is given by
TA
Mjk ;lm |lk
MAB = jm|AB . (1)
jklm
Notation: For a CDO ρB|A = ρTA
B|A
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
31. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
The Partial Transpose
Definition
Given a basis {|j A } of HA and an operator
MAB = jklm Mjk ;lm |jk lm|AB ∈ L (HA ⊗ HB ), the partial
transpose map on system A is given by
TA
Mjk ;lm |lk
MAB = jm|AB . (1)
jklm
Notation: For a CDO ρB|A = ρTA
B|A
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
32. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
The Markov Evolution Law
Theorem
Let EB|A : L (HA ) → L (HB ) be a TPCP map and let be a
density operator. Then for any ρAC ∈ L (HA ⊗ HC ),
EB|A ⊗ IC (ρAC ) = TrA ρB|A ρAC , (2)
for some fixed CDO ρB|A .
c.f. Classical stochastic dynamics
P(Y , Z ) = X P(Y |X )P(X , Z ).
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
33. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
The Markov Evolution Law
Theorem
Let EB|A : L (HA ) → L (HB ) be a TPCP map and let be a
density operator. Then for any ρAC ∈ L (HA ⊗ HC ),
EB|A ⊗ IC (ρAC ) = TrA ρB|A ρAC , (2)
for some fixed CDO ρB|A .
c.f. Classical stochastic dynamics
P(Y , Z ) = X P(Y |X )P(X , Z ).
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
34. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
The Markov Evolution Law
This is just a restatement of the Choi-Jamiołkowski
isomorphism.
Let Φ+ |jj
= AA.
AA
j
Φ+ Φ+
Then, ρB|A = EB|A ⊗ IA AA
Unitaries correspond to maximally entangled CDOs.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
35. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Conditional Density Operators
Quantum Causal Networks The Partial Transpose
Local Positivity: A Lament The Markov Evolution Law
Conclusions
The Markov Evolution Law
This is just a restatement of the Choi-Jamiołkowski
isomorphism.
Let Φ+ |jj
= AA.
AA
j
Φ+ Φ+
Then, ρB|A = EB|A ⊗ IA AA
Unitaries correspond to maximally entangled CDOs.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
36. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)
A DAG G = (V , E) models causal structure.
A
B C
D E
It is isomorphic to the Hasse diagram of a finite poset.
Parents: p(v ) = {u ∈ V : (u, v ) ∈ E}.
Children: c(v ) = {u ∈ V : (v , u) ∈ E}.
p(D) = {B, C}, c(D) = ∅,
p(C) = {A}, c(C) = {D, E}
Ancestral ordering, e.g. (A, B, C, D, E) or (A, C, E, B, D)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
37. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)
A DAG G = (V , E) models causal structure.
A
B C
D E
It is isomorphic to the Hasse diagram of a finite poset.
Parents: p(v ) = {u ∈ V : (u, v ) ∈ E}.
Children: c(v ) = {u ∈ V : (v , u) ∈ E}.
p(D) = {B, C}, c(D) = ∅,
p(C) = {A}, c(C) = {D, E}
Ancestral ordering, e.g. (A, B, C, D, E) or (A, C, E, B, D)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
38. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)
A DAG G = (V , E) models causal structure.
A
B C
D E
It is isomorphic to the Hasse diagram of a finite poset.
Parents: p(v ) = {u ∈ V : (u, v ) ∈ E}.
Children: c(v ) = {u ∈ V : (v , u) ∈ E}.
p(D) = {B, C}, c(D) = ∅,
p(C) = {A}, c(C) = {D, E}
Ancestral ordering, e.g. (A, B, C, D, E) or (A, C, E, B, D)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
39. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)
A DAG G = (V , E) models causal structure.
A
B C
D E
It is isomorphic to the Hasse diagram of a finite poset.
Parents: p(v ) = {u ∈ V : (u, v ) ∈ E}.
Children: c(v ) = {u ∈ V : (v , u) ∈ E}.
p(D) = {B, C}, c(D) = ∅,
p(C) = {A}, c(C) = {D, E}
Ancestral ordering, e.g. (A, B, C, D, E) or (A, C, E, B, D)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
40. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Classical Causal Networks
A Classical Causal Network is a DAG G = (V , E) together
with a probability distribution P(V ) that factorizes
according to
P(v |p(v ))
P(V ) =
v ∈V
A
B C
D E
P(A, B, C, D, E) = P(A)P(B|A)P(C|A)P(D|B, C)P(E|C)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
41. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Quantum Causal Networks
In the quantum case we have to deal with
no-cloning/no-broadcasting.
We cannot set CDOs independently of each other.
This can be solved by putting Hilbert spaces on the edges.
A
(AB) (AC)
B C
(CE)
(BD) (CD)
D E
Each vertex is associated with two TPCP maps
A fission isometry, e.g. E(CE)(CD)|C
A fusion map, e.g. FC|(AC)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
42. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Quantum Causal Networks
In the quantum case we have to deal with
no-cloning/no-broadcasting.
We cannot set CDOs independently of each other.
This can be solved by putting Hilbert spaces on the edges.
A
(AB) (AC)
B C
(CE)
(BD) (CD)
D E
Each vertex is associated with two TPCP maps
A fission isometry, e.g. E(CE)(CD)|C
A fusion map, e.g. FC|(AC)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
43. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Quantum Causal Networks
In the quantum case we have to deal with
no-cloning/no-broadcasting.
We cannot set CDOs independently of each other.
This can be solved by putting Hilbert spaces on the edges.
A
(AB) (AC)
B C
(CE)
(BD) (CD)
D E
Each vertex is associated with two TPCP maps
A fission isometry, e.g. E(CE)(CD)|C
A fusion map, e.g. FC|(AC)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
44. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
States on Quantum Causal Networks
The state on any “spacelike slice” can be found by
composing fusion and fission maps.
A
(AB) (AC)
B C
(CE)
(BD) (CD)
D E
ρA = FA|∅ (1)
ρBC = FB|(AB) ⊗ FC|(AC) E(AB)(AC)|A (ρA )
ρDE = FD|(BD)(CD) ⊗ FE|(CE) E(BD)|B ⊗ E(CD)(CE)|C (ρBC )
The states are consistent on any “foliation”.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
45. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
CDOs to the rescue!
This is a complete mess!
Define CDOs ρv |p(v ) by combining fusion and fission maps.
A
(AB) (AC)
B C
(CE)
(BD) (CD)
D E
Let τ be the CDO associated with a fusion map F.
†
ρB|A = E(AC)(AB)|A τB|(AB) ⊗ I(AC)
†
ρC|A = E(AC)(AB)|A τC|(AC) ⊗ I(AB)
† †
ρD|BC = E(BD)|B ⊗ E(CD)(CE)|C τD|(BD)(CD) ⊗ I(CE)
†
ρE|C = E(CD)(CE)|C τE|(CE)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
46. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
CDOs to the rescue!
This is a complete mess!
Define CDOs ρv |p(v ) by combining fusion and fission maps.
A
(AB) (AC)
B C
(CE)
(BD) (CD)
D E
Let τ be the CDO associated with a fusion map F.
†
ρB|A = E(AC)(AB)|A τB|(AB) ⊗ I(AC)
†
ρC|A = E(AC)(AB)|A τC|(AC) ⊗ I(AB)
† †
ρD|BC = E(BD)|B ⊗ E(CD)(CE)|C τD|(BD)(CD) ⊗ I(CE)
†
ρE|C = E(CD)(CE)|C τE|(CE)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
47. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
CDOs to the rescue!
This is a complete mess!
Define CDOs ρv |p(v ) by combining fusion and fission maps.
A
(AB) (AC)
B C
(CE)
(BD) (CD)
D E
Let τ be the CDO associated with a fusion map F.
†
ρB|A = E(AC)(AB)|A τB|(AB) ⊗ I(AC)
†
ρC|A = E(AC)(AB)|A τC|(AC) ⊗ I(AB)
† †
ρD|BC = E(BD)|B ⊗ E(CD)(CE)|C τD|(BD)(CD) ⊗ I(CE)
†
ρE|C = E(CD)(CE)|C τE|(CE)
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
48. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Decomposition into CDOs
A
(AB) (AC)
B C
(CE)
(BD) (CD)
D E
ρA ∗ ρB|A ∗ ρC|A ∗ ρD|BC ∗ ρE|C is a locally
ρABCDE =
positive operator with the correct reduced states on all
“spacelike slices”.
It doesn’t depend on the choice of ancestral ordering:
ρA ∗ ρC|A ∗ ρE|C ∗ ρB|A ∗ ρD|BC
ρABCDE =
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
49. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Decomposition into CDOs
A
(AB) (AC)
B C
(CE)
(BD) (CD)
D E
ρA ∗ ρB|A ∗ ρC|A ∗ ρD|BC ∗ ρE|C is a locally
ρABCDE =
positive operator with the correct reduced states on all
“spacelike slices”.
It doesn’t depend on the choice of ancestral ordering:
ρA ∗ ρC|A ∗ ρE|C ∗ ρB|A ∗ ρD|BC
ρABCDE =
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
50. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Markov Equivalence
Because the result is so similar to the classical case, we can
transcribe many known theorems with ease.
Definition
Two DAGs are Markov Equivalent if they support the same set
of “density operators” (up to local positive maps).
Theorem
Two DAGs are Markov Equivalent if they have the same links
and the same set of uncoupled head-to-head meetings.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
51. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Markov Equivalence
Because the result is so similar to the classical case, we can
transcribe many known theorems with ease.
Definition
Two DAGs are Markov Equivalent if they support the same set
of “density operators” (up to local positive maps).
Theorem
Two DAGs are Markov Equivalent if they have the same links
and the same set of uncoupled head-to-head meetings.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
52. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Markov Equivalence
Because the result is so similar to the classical case, we can
transcribe many known theorems with ease.
Definition
Two DAGs are Markov Equivalent if they support the same set
of “density operators” (up to local positive maps).
Theorem
Two DAGs are Markov Equivalent if they have the same links
and the same set of uncoupled head-to-head meetings.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
53. Introduction
Directed Acyclic Graphs
The Markov Evolution Law
Classical Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Quantum Causal Networks
Local Positivity: A Lament
Markov Equivalence
Conclusions
Markov Equivalence
A B C
These are equivalent
A B C
Uncoupled head-to-head
A B C
meeting
A C Coupled head-to-head
meeting
B
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
54. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
Local Positivity: A Lament
Life would be easier if it were ρB|A rather than ρB|A .
This stems from the fact that not all locally positive
operators are positive and not all positive maps are
completely positive.
∀MA , MB ≥ 0, Tr (MA ⊗ MB ρAB ) ≥ 0
doesn’t imply ∀MAB ≥ 0, Tr (MAB ρAB ) ≥ 0
Similarly, we cannot implement a map that is positive, but
not completely positive.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
55. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
Local Positivity: A Lament
Life would be easier if it were ρB|A rather than ρB|A .
This stems from the fact that not all locally positive
operators are positive and not all positive maps are
completely positive.
∀MA , MB ≥ 0, Tr (MA ⊗ MB ρAB ) ≥ 0
doesn’t imply ∀MAB ≥ 0, Tr (MAB ρAB ) ≥ 0
Similarly, we cannot implement a map that is positive, but
not completely positive.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
56. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
Local Positivity: A Lament
Life would be easier if it were ρB|A rather than ρB|A .
This stems from the fact that not all locally positive
operators are positive and not all positive maps are
completely positive.
∀MA , MB ≥ 0, Tr (MA ⊗ MB ρAB ) ≥ 0
doesn’t imply ∀MAB ≥ 0, Tr (MAB ρAB ) ≥ 0
Similarly, we cannot implement a map that is positive, but
not completely positive.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
57. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
Example: Universal Not
|0> |0>
z z
y y
x x
|1> |1>
|0> |0>
z z
y y
x x
|1> |1>
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
58. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
Implemeting Universal Not Passively
|0> |0>
z
x
y
y
x
z
|1> |1>
|0> |0>
z
x
y
y
x
z
|1> |1>
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
59. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
So what is the problem?
A
B C
D
Whilst B and C are separate, we may perform any positive
operation on them passively by just relabeling our POVM
elements, obtaining any locally positive state ρBC .
When we recombine them at D, we have to describe both
systems in a common “reference frame”.
We must ensure that ρD is positive.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
60. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
So what is the problem?
A
B C
D
Whilst B and C are separate, we may perform any positive
operation on them passively by just relabeling our POVM
elements, obtaining any locally positive state ρBC .
When we recombine them at D, we have to describe both
systems in a common “reference frame”.
We must ensure that ρD is positive.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
61. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
So what is the problem?
A
B C
D
Whilst B and C are separate, we may perform any positive
operation on them passively by just relabeling our POVM
elements, obtaining any locally positive state ρBC .
When we recombine them at D, we have to describe both
systems in a common “reference frame”.
We must ensure that ρD is positive.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
62. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
Are you down with LPP?
Definition
A map EB1 B2 ...Bn |A1 A2 ...Am : L HA1 ⊗ HA2 ⊗ . . . ⊗ HAm →
L HB1 ⊗ HB2 ⊗ . . . ⊗ HBn is completely local positivity
preserving (CLPP) if
EB1 B2 ...Bn |A1 A2 ...Am ⊗ IC ρA1 A2 ...Am C (3)
is locally positive for all HC and all locally positive operators
ρA1 A2 ...Am C .
For m = 1, n = 1 CLPP = Positive.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
63. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
Are you down with LPP?
Definition
A map EB1 B2 ...Bn |A1 A2 ...Am : L HA1 ⊗ HA2 ⊗ . . . ⊗ HAm →
L HB1 ⊗ HB2 ⊗ . . . ⊗ HBn is completely local positivity
preserving (CLPP) if
EB1 B2 ...Bn |A1 A2 ...Am ⊗ IC ρA1 A2 ...Am C (3)
is locally positive for all HC and all locally positive operators
ρA1 A2 ...Am C .
For m = 1, n = 1 CLPP = Positive.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
64. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Local Positivity
Quantum Causal Networks The Universal Not
Local Positivity: A Lament Local Positivity Preserving Maps
Conclusions
Are you down with LPP?
I have no good classification of CLPP maps.
It would be sufficient to classify CLPP maps of the form
EB|A1 A2 ...Am and EB1 B2 ...Bn |A .
A2
A1 A3 A
B B1 B3
B2
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
65. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Lessons for Quantum Gravity?
Quantum Causal Networks Open Questions
Local Positivity: A Lament Acknowledgments
Conclusions
Lessons for Quantum Gravity?
Correlation structure seems more intrinsic to quantum
theory than causal structure.
Maybe we don’t have to sum over all possible causal
structures - only Markov equivalence classes.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
66. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Lessons for Quantum Gravity?
Quantum Causal Networks Open Questions
Local Positivity: A Lament Acknowledgments
Conclusions
Open Questions
Classification of CLPP maps.
Including preparations and measurements - Quantum
Influence Diagrams.
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks
67. Introduction
The Markov Evolution Law Lessons for Quantum Gravity?
Quantum Causal Networks Open Questions
Local Positivity: A Lament Acknowledgments
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by:
The Foundational Questions Institute (http://www.fqxi.org)
MITACS (http://www.mitacs.math.ca)
NSERC (http://nserc.ca/)
The Province of Ontario: ORDCF/MRI
M. S. Leifer Quantum Causal Networks