This document provides an overview of a presentation given by Dr. John Uhlrich on publishing scientific research and writing high-impact research papers. The presentation covers topics such as selecting the right journal for publication, writing strategies like cover letters and titles, the peer review process, and promoting published work. Dr. Uhlrich is an editor at Wiley-VCH and the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Energy Technology. He discusses his own background and career in chemical engineering and materials science research before delving into advice and insights on navigating the scientific publication process successfully.

1. © 2018
Publishing Scientific Research &
How to Write High-Impact Research Papers
Dr. John Uhlrich
Editor

2. © 2018
1) About Wiley-VCH
2) The psychology of editors and reviewers
and demystifying the publication process
3) Writing for scientific success
4) Q & A
Today’s Talk

3. © 2018
• PhD students?
• Post-Docs or beyond?
• Who has already published something?
• Have you had the opportunity to act as a
peer reviewer for a submitted research
manuscript?
• Who can imagine a career in publishing?
Who are you?

4. © 2018
Who am I?
• Chemical Engineering, PhD University of
Wisconsin, USA
• Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
Materials/Devices
• Postdoc 2009-2011: Fritz Haber Institute, Berlin
Department of Chemical Physics (H.J. Freund)
• Surface Science for Model Catalysis
• 2011– 2012:
– Editor, Advanced Materials, Advanced Functional
Materials
• 2012-present:
– Editor, Energy Technology

5. © 2018
Who am I?
• Chemical Engineering, PhD University of
Wisconsin, USA
• Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
Materials/Devices
• Postdoc 2009-2011: Fritz Haber Institute, Berlin
Department of Chemical Physics (H.J. Freund)
• Surface Science for Model Catalysis
• 2011– 2012:
– Editor, Advanced Materials, Advanced Functional
Materials
• 2012-present:
– Editor, Energy Technology

6. © 2018
John Wiley & Sons
South Korea
Founded in 1807 in New York City by John Wiley
To this day family-owned in the 6th generation
Approx. 5,000 staff worldwide
Wiley Online Library has 130 million users
1,500 journals, 1200 society partners
Company headquarters are in Hoboken (New Jersey)
Wiley-VCH (Germany) has been part of Wiley since 1996

7. © 2018
Weinheim office

8. © 2018
• Wiley-VCH, Wiley-Blackwell, Ernst & Sohn, GIT
• Weinheim, Berlin, Zürich (CH)
• 530 employees (450/ 70/ 14)
– ~ 70% female - 30% male
– Average age ~ 42 years
– Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
– Foreign employees 40%
from 24 different nations
• Primarily chemists, followed by materials scientists, physicists, biologists,
mathematicians
Our Office

9. © 2018
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/02/06/focusing-value-102-things-
journal-publishers-2018-update/?informz=1

10. © 2018
Some highlights
46. Search engine optimization.
50. Dealing with data.
55. Media relations and publicity.
56. Social media distribution and management.
58. Integrating new standards.
60. Hosting and archiving.
73. Managing and protecting
editorial records.
101. Work together to solve more general
access and fairness issues.
86. Provide training in emerging publishing
markets. (but not just emerging markets!)
34. Copy-editing, proofreading, and styling of
materials.
27. Ethics investigations.
26. Management of peer review process.

11. © 2018
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy

12. © 2018
1500 journals, books
And More...

13. © 2018
• Honestly assess the
importance/impact and
scope of your work
• Journal Impact Factor is not
everything!
• What are the implications
of your research?
• How important will others
find your research?
– In your field?
– In related fields?
• Publication fees? Open
access?
• Speed of publication?
• What is the scope of your
candidate journal?
• Who reads your candidate
journal?
Selecting the Journal

14. © 2018
Publishing by the numbers
1) On the author level: Hirsch Index (H-Index)
- h published articles, each cited at least h times
2) On the journal level: Impact Factor
- measures level of citation of articles in a given journal
3) On the article level: Altmetrics
Nothing replaces reading the article itself!
- measures the attention an individual article receives
on social media and in the news

15. © 2018
Number of source items published in 2016 and 2015
_________________________________
Impact Factor2017 =
Number of citations in 2017 to articles published in 2016 and 2015
Example
Journal of … publishes 75 articles in 2015 and
83 articles in 2016.
In 2017 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals.
The journal’s Impact Factor for 2017 is
344  (75 + 83) = 2.18
2017
2014
2013
2012
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Cited
window
Citing
window
2017
2015
2016
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2017 Impact Factor first appears in 2018.

16. © 2018
“...originally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial,
and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about
it because it has become a plague. ”

17. © 2018
1) Arbitrary 2-year window, citation practices depend upon the field and
on the specific work
2) Assumes that all citations are positive (a citation is not necessarily
an endorsement!)
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values: doesn’t
say anything about the quality of an individual work
4) Incentives for poor research practice & unethical behavior (on the
parts of both publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment

18. © 2018
•Covering the technical aspects of
applied energy research
–Generation
–Conversion
–Storage
–Distribution
•Companion journal of other related
Wiley titles (Advanced Energy
Materials, ChemSusChem, etc.)
•Listed in important databases
(ISI, Web of Knowledge, Scopus)
•Impact Factor (2017): 3.175
•Online publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Editor-in-Chief
Dr. John Uhlrich

19. © 2018
•Covering the technical aspects of
applied energy research
–Generation
–Conversion
–Storage
–Distribution
•Companion journal of other related
Wiley titles (Advanced Energy
Materials, ChemSusChem, etc.)
•Listed in important databases
(ISI, Web of Knowledge, Scopus)
•Impact Factor (2017): 3.175
•Online publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Editor-in-Chief
Dr. John Uhlrich

20. © 2018
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage Materials/Batteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy, Science & Engineering
Conference
Special Issues
Chemical Looping Li-Ion Batteries
Pyrolysis
CO2 Utilization KIT Energy Center
Perovskite Optoelectronics
CREATE Campus Hydrogen Storage

21. © 2018
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage Materials/Batteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy, Science & Engineering
Conference
Special Issues
Chemical Looping Li-Ion Batteries
Pyrolysis
CO2 Utilization KIT Energy Center
Perovskite Optoelectronics
CREATE Campus Hydrogen Storage
Ferroelectrics
Ferroic Cooling

22. © 2018
“If your research does not generate papers, it
might just as well not have been done.
‘Interesting and unpublished‘ is equivalent to
non-existant.“
“Realize that your objective in research is to
formulate and test hypotheses, to draw
conclusions from these tests, and to teach
these conclusions to others. Your objective is
not to ‘collect data‘.“
George Whitesides, “Whitesides‘ Group: Writing a
Paper“, Essay in Advanced Materials, 2004, 16, 1375 .
Why publish at all?

23. © 2018
Don't underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper.

24. © 2018
Is the novelty
high enough?
Difference to
prior work?
Important to the
whole readership?
Important to
researchers
in this field?
After the initial check for scope and length is done,
the manuscript is examined more closely:
the most
important
hurdle!
„Publishing space is
limited – choose a journal
whose readership will be
keen to see your results!“
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)

25. © 2018
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts, editors will especially look at:
Cover letter “If I‘m interested, my
readers will be, too!ˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look?

26. © 2018
Cover Letter: The Worst Type

27. © 2018
• Why is this topic important?
• Why are these results significant?
• What is the key result? (breakthrough!)
• Why is it an advance on previous work?
• Why are you submitting to this journal?
• Why will this journal’s readers read it?
• Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper, the cover
letter is one of the first things the editor will see, so make it
count!
Tip: Keep the letter as concise as possible – the longer it is, the
easier it becomes to overlook something important.
Maximizing Success: Writing the Cover Letter

28. © 2018
• Why is this topic important?
• Why are these results significant?
• What is the key result? (breakthrough!)
• Why is it an advance on previous work?
• Why are you submitting to this journal?
• Why will this journal’s readers read it?
• Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper, the cover
letter is one of the first things the editor will see, so make it
count!
Tip: Keep the letter as concise as possible – the longer it is, the
easier it becomes to overlook something important.
Maximizing Success: Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell Example:
We have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability,
using earth-abundant materials, by using a simple synthetic method,
nontoxic precursors, using a scaleable fabrication procedure, with a
unique combination materials that increase our fundamental
understanding of photovoltaic devices.

29. © 2018
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Editors examine &
make initial decision in house
Manuscript sent out
for external peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic,
novelty, or quality
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (e.g., shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow

30. © 2018
• Present data honestly and accurately, not
fabricate or falsify data
• Reference and cite properly, not plagiarize or
ignore related work
• Avoid fragmentation and redundant
publication
• Inform the editor of related manuscripts under
consideration or in press
• Submit to only one journal at a time
• Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities

31. © 2018
• Ensure efficient, fair, and timely manuscript processing
• Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
• Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
• Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of
the manuscript
• Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for
their own research
• Ensure fair selection of referees, including those
suggested or requested for exclusion by author
• Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
• Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities

32. © 2018
• Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top
experts in your field.
• Don’t take it personally – it is not an attack on you!
• Be thorough and a little self-critical; remember that the referee
is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation.
• Remember that everyone is human! Take every criticism as
an opportunity for improvement; this is a “trial run“ for how
your work may be perceived after publication.
How to Read a Referee Report
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/01/18/15-steps-to-revising-journal-articles/

33. © 2018
• Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top
experts in your field.
• Don’t take it personally – it is not an attack on you!
• Be thorough and a little self-critical; remember that the referee
is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation.
• Remember that everyone is human! Take every criticism as
an opportunity for improvement; this is a “trial run“ for how
your work may be perceived after publication.
How to Read a Referee Report
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/01/18/15-steps-to-revising-journal-articles/
https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-
network/2017/mar/31/dear-anonymous-peer-reviewer-
your-criticism-made-me-a-better-researcher

34. Credit: Nick Kim (www.nearingzero.net)
Stay Calm 

35. © 2018
http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog/2013/09/23/10-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read/
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library
and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos & blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work

36. © 2018
1. Have something to say.
2. Say it.
3. Stop as soon as you have said it!
4. Give the paper a proper title!
Source:
John S. Billings:
An Address on
our Medical
Literature.
Br Med J (1881)
2:262-268.
The Four Basic Rules

37. © 2018
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paper’s “discoverability”:
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
“search-engine optimization”
Title & Abstract

38. © 2018
What effect?
Which metal(s)?
What type of coupling reaction(s)?
Which aryl alcohols?
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride:
An Effective Catalyst for C-H
Activation with 2,4-Disubstituted
Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title

39. © 2018
DOI: 10.1126/science.355.6320.102
Telling a Story

40. © 2018
DOI: 10.1126/science.355.6320.102
Answer 3 Questions:
• What is the Status Quo?
– Too little: Risk losing a large audience who may
not be experts on this topic.
• What is wrong with the Status Quo?
– Too little: “Why do we need yet another paper
on this topic?“
• How does this work go beyond the Status
Quo?
– Too little: The novelty of your work is not clear.
Telling a Story

41. © 2018
• Don‘t forget to factor in time to work on
the presentation of your work
• Have a friend/colleague read your
manuscript; read your own work again
after setting it aside for a couple of days
• Have a native speaker proofread for
language, if available (editorial services
are also available)
http://wileyeditingservices.com/en/ www.ChemistryViews.org
A Few More Tips

42. © 2018
• Don‘t forget to factor in time to work on
the presentation of your work
• Have a friend/colleague read your
manuscript; read your own work again
after setting it aside for a couple of days
• Have a native speaker proofread for
language, if available (editorial services
are also available)
http://wileyeditingservices.com/en/ www.ChemistryViews.org
A Few More Tips
http://wileyeditingservices.com/en/

43. © 2018
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best!
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isn’t perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard, so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions

44. © 2018
@EnergyTechnol
Questions?
• Contact me:
– John Uhlrich
jjuhlrich@wiley.com
Energy Technology
www.entechnol.de
energy-technology@wiley.com
Submissions:
www.editorialmanager.com/ente/
https://www.facebook.com/EnergyTechnologyJournal/

45. © 2018