This document is a course syllabus for PSY 405 Theories of Personality at the University of Phoenix. It outlines the general course information including dates, required reading, facilitator information, and grading criteria. The syllabus describes the weekly course structure and assignments, which include discussion questions, individual papers, and learning team matrices analyzing personality theories. Students are expected to apply personality theories to understand individual characteristics and interpersonal relationships.
Psy 304 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.comBartholomew81
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 1 Theories of Development
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 2 The Brain and Sleep
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 1 Cognition Development Across the Lifespan
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 2 Information Processing Across the Lifespan
PSY 304 Week 2 Assignment Lifespan Development Topic
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 1 Theories of Development
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 2 The Brain and Sleep
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 1 Cognition Development Across the Lifespan
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 2 Information Processing Across the Lifespan
PSY 304 Week 2 Assignment Lifespan Development Topic One (2 Papers)
PSY 304 Week 3 DQ 1 Intelligence and Its Controversies
This document provides guidance for developing literature review skills. It begins with introductory activities to link research topics to practice. It then outlines the session aims of developing research and inquiry skills. Examples are provided to demonstrate how to identify theoretical frameworks and contextualize research questions. Guidance is given on critically reviewing literature, including identifying subjectivity and objectivity. The document concludes by modeling how to critically review a peer-reviewed journal article.
De vry engl 147 all discussions latest 2016 novemberlenasour
This document provides instructions and discussion questions for multiple weekly discussions in an English course. It includes prompts for discussing topics like argumentative strategies, evaluating sources, peer reviewing draft essays, and using APA style documentation. Students are asked to find sources on given topics, analyze samples, and provide feedback to classmates on their draft papers. The discussions aim to prepare students for researching and writing their final course project paper.
This document provides ratings for a student's work on a multicultural music project. [1] The student responded to questions in complete sentences and provided thorough responses and thoughts, but only described the music using a few grade-level appropriate words. [2] The student almost included 6 facts in their Google Docs document and information researched was clear but could have been more thorough. [3] The student's powerpoint slide contained 1-4 facts not found in other group members' slides and bullet points read directly off the presentation with more than 6 words.
Sigmund Freud's psychodynamic theory of personality proposes that personality is composed of the id, ego, and superego. The id operates on the pleasure principle, seeking pleasure and avoiding pain, while the superego acts as our moral conscience based on internalized social standards. The ego mediates between the two, balancing realistic needs and moral demands. Freud believed unconscious drives and early childhood experiences strongly influence personality development and behavior. Later theorists like Jung emphasized archetypes from the collective unconscious and object relations theory focused on early infant relationships. While psychodynamic theories are difficult to test, modern research continues to support some of their core concepts around unconscious processes.
The impact of innovation on travel and tourism industries (World Travel Marke...Brian Solis
From the impact of Pokemon Go on Silicon Valley to artificial intelligence, futurist Brian Solis talks to Mathew Parsons of World Travel Market about the future of travel, tourism and hospitality.
We’re all trying to find that idea or spark that will turn a good project into a great project. Creativity plays a huge role in the outcome of our work. Harnessing the power of collaboration and open source, we can make great strides towards excellence. Not just for designers, this talk can be applicable to many different roles – even development. In this talk, Seasoned Creative Director Sara Cannon is going to share some secrets about creative methodology, collaboration, and the strong role that open source can play in our work.
Psy 304 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.comBartholomew81
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 1 Theories of Development
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 2 The Brain and Sleep
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 1 Cognition Development Across the Lifespan
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 2 Information Processing Across the Lifespan
PSY 304 Week 2 Assignment Lifespan Development Topic
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 1 Theories of Development
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 2 The Brain and Sleep
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 1 Cognition Development Across the Lifespan
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 2 Information Processing Across the Lifespan
PSY 304 Week 2 Assignment Lifespan Development Topic One (2 Papers)
PSY 304 Week 3 DQ 1 Intelligence and Its Controversies
This document provides guidance for developing literature review skills. It begins with introductory activities to link research topics to practice. It then outlines the session aims of developing research and inquiry skills. Examples are provided to demonstrate how to identify theoretical frameworks and contextualize research questions. Guidance is given on critically reviewing literature, including identifying subjectivity and objectivity. The document concludes by modeling how to critically review a peer-reviewed journal article.
De vry engl 147 all discussions latest 2016 novemberlenasour
This document provides instructions and discussion questions for multiple weekly discussions in an English course. It includes prompts for discussing topics like argumentative strategies, evaluating sources, peer reviewing draft essays, and using APA style documentation. Students are asked to find sources on given topics, analyze samples, and provide feedback to classmates on their draft papers. The discussions aim to prepare students for researching and writing their final course project paper.
This document provides ratings for a student's work on a multicultural music project. [1] The student responded to questions in complete sentences and provided thorough responses and thoughts, but only described the music using a few grade-level appropriate words. [2] The student almost included 6 facts in their Google Docs document and information researched was clear but could have been more thorough. [3] The student's powerpoint slide contained 1-4 facts not found in other group members' slides and bullet points read directly off the presentation with more than 6 words.
Sigmund Freud's psychodynamic theory of personality proposes that personality is composed of the id, ego, and superego. The id operates on the pleasure principle, seeking pleasure and avoiding pain, while the superego acts as our moral conscience based on internalized social standards. The ego mediates between the two, balancing realistic needs and moral demands. Freud believed unconscious drives and early childhood experiences strongly influence personality development and behavior. Later theorists like Jung emphasized archetypes from the collective unconscious and object relations theory focused on early infant relationships. While psychodynamic theories are difficult to test, modern research continues to support some of their core concepts around unconscious processes.
The impact of innovation on travel and tourism industries (World Travel Marke...Brian Solis
From the impact of Pokemon Go on Silicon Valley to artificial intelligence, futurist Brian Solis talks to Mathew Parsons of World Travel Market about the future of travel, tourism and hospitality.
We’re all trying to find that idea or spark that will turn a good project into a great project. Creativity plays a huge role in the outcome of our work. Harnessing the power of collaboration and open source, we can make great strides towards excellence. Not just for designers, this talk can be applicable to many different roles – even development. In this talk, Seasoned Creative Director Sara Cannon is going to share some secrets about creative methodology, collaboration, and the strong role that open source can play in our work.
Assignment 1 INSTRUCTIONS This assignment consists of a sho.docxsherni1
Assignment 1
INSTRUCTIONS: This assignment consists of a short essay question, and some short logic questions.
The main intent of these questions is to ensure that you have a sound grasp of the fundamentals of the
material presented in this unit. The logic questions are intended to draw on some important logical
concepts that will be relevant throughout the course. Although an understanding of basic logic
terminology and argumentation is important in this course, logic for its own sake is not the focus of this
course. As such, the short essay question should attract most of your attention with this assignment.
There is a 3 to 4 page (1000 words) limit for the short essay question. I’m not so concerned with whether
you agree with a particular author or not. The quality of your answer is based on your exposition of the
competing positions, your comparative analysis of those positions and, lastly, your argument in support of
the position you defend.
As with all the assignments in this course, the short essay question is not designed to be a “research”
question. There is no requirement to get material from external sources such as websites like Wikipedia.
In fact, doing so can count against you. The point of your essay is to formulate the course material and
develop your critical response. You can do this by working with the course material and developing your
own ideas about the issue. The essay is simply your opportunity to set that out in paper.
So, the material you need to successfully complete this assignment can be found in the online course
materials available through the course website. There may also be some reading material that is part of
the hard copy course readings package. You can find this information on the course materials section of
the course website.
Questions: (The total possible mark for this assignment is 100 marks.)
Short Essay Question – The Nature of Philosophy:
In Apology, Socrates refers to himself as a gadfly. Explain how this metaphor is considered to be
characteristic of the discipline of philosophy and its relationship with other academic and intellectual
pursuits. Explain Socrates’ argument for his assertion that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” Do
you agree with Socrates’ conclusion? Explain why or why not. (70 marks.)
Logic questions – You should try to limit yourself to two or three paragraphs per answer for each of
these questions.
1. Explain the difference between an invalid deductive argument and a strong inductive argument. Why is
it correct to consider one to be a “good” argument and the other one a “bad” argument? (10 marks.)
2. The following argument is deductively invalid. Indicate the form, or structure, of the argument, and
provide your own counterexample (i.e., an example with all true premises and a false conclusion) that
clearly shows the invalidity. (10 marks.)
All cynical people are disgruntled. Some meticulous people are cynical. Therefore, ...
Citation Method Lesson number 6 in Practical Research Isirarjhel
The document discusses citation styles used in academic writing. It defines citation as providing credit to other authors' works to avoid plagiarism. The document outlines four key objectives for learning about citation, including defining citation, explaining its importance in literature reviews, differentiating citation styles, and applying APA style. It further explains the definition and importance of citation, parts of a citation, and three common citation styles: MLA, APA, and Chicago.
PSY 304 RANK Education Your Life / psy304rank.comkopiko24
This document provides an overview of the course materials for PSY 304 Entire Course. It includes discussion questions, assignments, and a final paper on various topics related to lifespan development. Some of the key topics covered include theories of development, cognition and memory changes across lifespan, nature vs nurture influences, and influences of parents and peers during development. Students are asked to examine developmental issues through analyzing relevant theories and research on multiple developmental domains and stages.
This document provides guidance on the research and writing process for an academic essay. It discusses gathering sources, organizing ideas, developing an outline, writing draft sections, and getting peer feedback. Students are encouraged to carefully plan their essay by breaking down the question, researching multiple sources, and mapping out their argument before drafting individual sections. The conclusion restates the main points and considers future directions or implications. Peer review involves giving and receiving feedback to strengthen essays through multiple drafts.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 1 Theories of Development
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 2 The Brain and Sleep
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 1 Cognition Development Across the Lifespan
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 1 Theories of Development
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 2 The Brain and Sleep
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 1 Cognition Development Across the Lifespan
This document summarizes the coursework for PSY 250 Entire Course, which includes 5 weekly assignments:
1) A personality reflection worksheet.
2) Two papers analyzing psychoanalytic and biological/humanistic approaches to personality.
3) A team presentation applying person-situation interactions to a scenario.
4) A paper analyzing habit formation using behavioral and social/cognitive approaches.
5) A team paper describing each member's personality traits based on assessment results.
The assignments require analyzing personality theories, assessing personality traits, examining influences on habits and behavior, and applying course concepts.
Table of Contents1Individual Assignment21.1Aims of the assignm.docxssuserf9c51d
Table of Contents
1Individual Assignment2
1.1Aims of the assignment2
1.2The Assignment Topic2
1.3Resources for the Individual Assignment2
2Process and Preparation4
2.1Plan Your Essay5
2.1.1Know the Purpose of Assignments5
2.1.2Addressing the Topic5
2.2Academic reading7
2.2.1How to Incorporate Your Own Ideas8
2.2.2Producing a Draft8
2.2.3Working towards the Final Version9
2.3Referencing9
2.3.1When to cite references9
2.3.2Citing Internet sources10
2.3.3The Reference List10
3Guide to Presentation and Structure10
3.1.1Introduction10
3.1.2Body of the Essay11
3.1.3Conclusion11
3.2Assignment Checklist12
4Assessment One Marking Rubric13
Individual AssignmentAims of the assignment
The aims of this assignment are for you to:
· Develop your understanding of the nature of the key organisational perspectives and their related theories;
· Demonstrate an understanding of the key perspectives and the meta-theoretical assumptions that underpin each;
· Develop research skills and the ability to assess the strengths and weaknesses of various debates and arguments;
· Demonstrate the ability to critically engage with academic literature and develop your own answer to a set question.
· Gain skills in the written presentation of an argument, including the ways in which scholars incorporate and acknowledge the ideas of other writers.The Assignment Topic
The assignment topic is as follows:
Four Organizational Theory perspectives, namely Modernist, Critical theorist, Symbolic Interpretivist and Postmodernist, produce different narratives about technology.
Choose two Organisational Theory perspectives. Based on your selected perspectives, identify and draw out the two readings out of the given list that match your chosen perspectives.
Critically analyse the two readings and evaluate how their ontological and epistemological positions result in a different understanding and narrative of technology within organisations. Resources for the Individual Assignment
The following are assignment resources from which you choose four that are relevant to your chosen perspectives:
1. Selwyn, N. (2002). ‘E-stablishing’an inclusive society? Technology, social exclusion and UK government policy making. Journal of Social Policy, 31(01), 1-20. CRITICAL THEORY
2. Spanos, Y. E., Prastacos, G. P., & Poulymenakou, A. (2002). The relationship between information and communication technologies adoption and management. Information & Management, 39(8), 659-675. MODERNIST
3. Cukier, W., Ngwenyama, O., Bauer, R., & Middleton, C. (2009). A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis. Information Systems Journal, 19(2), 175-196. POSTMODERNIST
4. Ciborra, C. U., & Lanzara, G. F. (1994). Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations.Accounting, management and information technologies, 4(2), 61-86. SYMBOLLIC INTERPRETIVIST
Based on your selected pers ...
ENG 200 Effective Communication/tutorialrank.comjonhson277
This document provides instructions for an ENG 200 course assignment on assessing arguments. Students are asked to review three sample essays demonstrating different argument styles, then choose one to evaluate using strategies from their textbook. They must write a minimum 350-word assessment of the chosen essay, identifying the author, thesis, organization effectiveness, argument methods, response to other arguments, and timeliness. They must also include a relevant quote from the essay.
This document provides tips for students on writing an individual learning log essay that is self-reflective and draws from two speakers' presentations. It outlines the requirements of the 2,000-word essay including an abstract, structure with subheadings, use of academic sources to support arguments, and reflective language. Students are encouraged to choose topics they find interesting and link their arguments through a theme or their own reflection.
UNSW Masters of Business and Technology Study Skills presentation given as a webinar. NOTE: An earlier version is also available as an open course on Blackboard CourseSites. Please note this PowerPoint version is not CCSA licensed. ZTo ask for permission to use or to issue a takedown notice please contact a.chambers@unsw.edu.au
- The document provides an overview and instructions for assignments in PSY 405 Theories of Personality course, including creating brochures and presentations comparing various psychodynamic theories, worksheets on humanistic and existential theories, a newspaper article on dispositional and evolutionary theories, and presentations and papers analyzing different personality theories.
- Students are asked to analyze and compare theories like Freud, Jung, Adler, Maslow, Rogers, and learning/cognitive theorists through various written and multimedia assignments.
- The assignments require outlining key aspects of theories, their strengths/weaknesses, and how they explain personality and relationships.
This document provides an overview of the Literary Theory course taught by Dr. Gerald R. Lucas. There are three major requirements: class participation, weekly reading responses, and leading one class discussion on an assigned reading. The course will survey literary theory from ancient Greece through contemporary theories. It will examine works challengingly and engage students to better understand literature and theoretical discourse. A tentative schedule outlines the theories to be covered each week throughout the semester.
The first lecture for a semester-long introductory psychology unit of study (tertiary-level). This is one half of a year long unit. Approx. 1/3rd of the lectures are on slideshare. Others were by guest lecturers.
Slides from the NW part-time researcher workshop on 1 November featuring sessions on academic writing styles and getting the best from a part-time supervisor. This workshop was hosted by the University of Chester (Warrington campus) and facilitated by Emma Gillaspy and Moira Peelo
CHLD 113: Philosophy Statement
Student Learning Outcome
This assignment is designed to assess the following student learning outcome (SLO):
Compare and contrast various theoretical frameworks that relate to the study of human development.
Developing Your Personal Philosophy
The Philosophy Statement assignment provides an opportunity to review the theoretical perspectives discussed throughout this semester. In a 3-5 page paper (excluding title page, abstract, and references) you will argue which theories you believe best explain how children think, learn, grow, and develop.
A philosophy is a set of beliefs about how children develop and learn. This is an individualized statement that is based on core values and beliefs. These are related to your beliefs about the nature and purpose of life, your role and calling in life, and your relationship and responsibilities to others. A philosophy is more than an opinion; it is based on theoretical frameworks, as well as empirical data. Understanding and applying this information is valuable, but ultimately you have to decide what you personally believe and why you believe that. Moment by moment, day by day, what you believe impacts what you will teach and how you will teach it.
Review
: Review the five theoretical perspectives discussed throughout the text. Re-read chapter two, then review the concepts in other chapters that discuss development in terms of the theories. For example, Berger (the author) comes back to Piaget and Vygotsky in the chapters on cognitive development (especially in chapters 9 and 12), and comes back to Erikson (and sometimes Freud) in the chapters on psychosocial development. She reviews theories when she discusses language learning (chapter 6), infant development (chapter 7), and gender roles (chapter 10). The theories are woven throughout the text. Also review the lecture and PowerPoint slides posted in the Chapter 2 learning unit folder. In addition, the “Additional Resources” section of chapter two lists numerous videos and websites that will help you better understand the theories
Reflect and Select
: Spend time thinking and talking about the various theories and brainstorm points you want to make in your philosophy statement. Write an outline or web to help you organize your ideas before you start writing your actual essay. You do not need to use every part of every theory in your paper. Some students are eclectic and use some aspect of each theory. Some students select several theories and focus on specific aspects of those theories.
For this assignment you are required to use a minimum of three theories
(can be parts of a theory – such as social learning from behaviorism, information processing from cognitive, and Freud from psychoanalytic). The possibilities are endless within the five major theories, but here are some aspects of the theories that previous students have incorporated into their philosophy statements:
Psychoanalytic Theory
Freud’s concepts (unco.
This document outlines the syllabus for an online English 102 course titled "Writing About Place & Identity" taught during the summer of 2019. The course focuses on applying principles of expository and argumentative essay writing through exploring how one's environment shapes their life and identity. Major assignments include a personal narrative essay, annotated bibliography, exploratory research essay, and op-ed essay. The course aims to help students develop composition and research skills to communicate effectively for different audiences and contexts. It provides learning outcomes, assignment requirements and deadlines, grading policies, textbook information, and instructor contact details.
essay PowerPoint notes in introduction of CARDkristinso
This document provides information and guidelines for an individual assignment on discipline-based studies for a tutorial. Students are asked to write a 500-600 word essay responding to the prompt: "Has social media in virtual reality become an arena of 'Post-truth' which operates as consistent guidance for youth's behaviour and vision? Are critical thinking and reasoning the useful means to help the youth to cope with the 'post-truth' era?" The document outlines the assessment criteria, submission process, and tips for writing an argumentative essay to score well.
Assignment 1 INSTRUCTIONS This assignment consists of a sho.docxsherni1
Assignment 1
INSTRUCTIONS: This assignment consists of a short essay question, and some short logic questions.
The main intent of these questions is to ensure that you have a sound grasp of the fundamentals of the
material presented in this unit. The logic questions are intended to draw on some important logical
concepts that will be relevant throughout the course. Although an understanding of basic logic
terminology and argumentation is important in this course, logic for its own sake is not the focus of this
course. As such, the short essay question should attract most of your attention with this assignment.
There is a 3 to 4 page (1000 words) limit for the short essay question. I’m not so concerned with whether
you agree with a particular author or not. The quality of your answer is based on your exposition of the
competing positions, your comparative analysis of those positions and, lastly, your argument in support of
the position you defend.
As with all the assignments in this course, the short essay question is not designed to be a “research”
question. There is no requirement to get material from external sources such as websites like Wikipedia.
In fact, doing so can count against you. The point of your essay is to formulate the course material and
develop your critical response. You can do this by working with the course material and developing your
own ideas about the issue. The essay is simply your opportunity to set that out in paper.
So, the material you need to successfully complete this assignment can be found in the online course
materials available through the course website. There may also be some reading material that is part of
the hard copy course readings package. You can find this information on the course materials section of
the course website.
Questions: (The total possible mark for this assignment is 100 marks.)
Short Essay Question – The Nature of Philosophy:
In Apology, Socrates refers to himself as a gadfly. Explain how this metaphor is considered to be
characteristic of the discipline of philosophy and its relationship with other academic and intellectual
pursuits. Explain Socrates’ argument for his assertion that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” Do
you agree with Socrates’ conclusion? Explain why or why not. (70 marks.)
Logic questions – You should try to limit yourself to two or three paragraphs per answer for each of
these questions.
1. Explain the difference between an invalid deductive argument and a strong inductive argument. Why is
it correct to consider one to be a “good” argument and the other one a “bad” argument? (10 marks.)
2. The following argument is deductively invalid. Indicate the form, or structure, of the argument, and
provide your own counterexample (i.e., an example with all true premises and a false conclusion) that
clearly shows the invalidity. (10 marks.)
All cynical people are disgruntled. Some meticulous people are cynical. Therefore, ...
Citation Method Lesson number 6 in Practical Research Isirarjhel
The document discusses citation styles used in academic writing. It defines citation as providing credit to other authors' works to avoid plagiarism. The document outlines four key objectives for learning about citation, including defining citation, explaining its importance in literature reviews, differentiating citation styles, and applying APA style. It further explains the definition and importance of citation, parts of a citation, and three common citation styles: MLA, APA, and Chicago.
PSY 304 RANK Education Your Life / psy304rank.comkopiko24
This document provides an overview of the course materials for PSY 304 Entire Course. It includes discussion questions, assignments, and a final paper on various topics related to lifespan development. Some of the key topics covered include theories of development, cognition and memory changes across lifespan, nature vs nurture influences, and influences of parents and peers during development. Students are asked to examine developmental issues through analyzing relevant theories and research on multiple developmental domains and stages.
This document provides guidance on the research and writing process for an academic essay. It discusses gathering sources, organizing ideas, developing an outline, writing draft sections, and getting peer feedback. Students are encouraged to carefully plan their essay by breaking down the question, researching multiple sources, and mapping out their argument before drafting individual sections. The conclusion restates the main points and considers future directions or implications. Peer review involves giving and receiving feedback to strengthen essays through multiple drafts.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 1 Theories of Development
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 2 The Brain and Sleep
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 1 Cognition Development Across the Lifespan
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 1 Theories of Development
PSY 304 Week 1 DQ 2 The Brain and Sleep
PSY 304 Week 2 DQ 1 Cognition Development Across the Lifespan
This document summarizes the coursework for PSY 250 Entire Course, which includes 5 weekly assignments:
1) A personality reflection worksheet.
2) Two papers analyzing psychoanalytic and biological/humanistic approaches to personality.
3) A team presentation applying person-situation interactions to a scenario.
4) A paper analyzing habit formation using behavioral and social/cognitive approaches.
5) A team paper describing each member's personality traits based on assessment results.
The assignments require analyzing personality theories, assessing personality traits, examining influences on habits and behavior, and applying course concepts.
Table of Contents1Individual Assignment21.1Aims of the assignm.docxssuserf9c51d
Table of Contents
1Individual Assignment2
1.1Aims of the assignment2
1.2The Assignment Topic2
1.3Resources for the Individual Assignment2
2Process and Preparation4
2.1Plan Your Essay5
2.1.1Know the Purpose of Assignments5
2.1.2Addressing the Topic5
2.2Academic reading7
2.2.1How to Incorporate Your Own Ideas8
2.2.2Producing a Draft8
2.2.3Working towards the Final Version9
2.3Referencing9
2.3.1When to cite references9
2.3.2Citing Internet sources10
2.3.3The Reference List10
3Guide to Presentation and Structure10
3.1.1Introduction10
3.1.2Body of the Essay11
3.1.3Conclusion11
3.2Assignment Checklist12
4Assessment One Marking Rubric13
Individual AssignmentAims of the assignment
The aims of this assignment are for you to:
· Develop your understanding of the nature of the key organisational perspectives and their related theories;
· Demonstrate an understanding of the key perspectives and the meta-theoretical assumptions that underpin each;
· Develop research skills and the ability to assess the strengths and weaknesses of various debates and arguments;
· Demonstrate the ability to critically engage with academic literature and develop your own answer to a set question.
· Gain skills in the written presentation of an argument, including the ways in which scholars incorporate and acknowledge the ideas of other writers.The Assignment Topic
The assignment topic is as follows:
Four Organizational Theory perspectives, namely Modernist, Critical theorist, Symbolic Interpretivist and Postmodernist, produce different narratives about technology.
Choose two Organisational Theory perspectives. Based on your selected perspectives, identify and draw out the two readings out of the given list that match your chosen perspectives.
Critically analyse the two readings and evaluate how their ontological and epistemological positions result in a different understanding and narrative of technology within organisations. Resources for the Individual Assignment
The following are assignment resources from which you choose four that are relevant to your chosen perspectives:
1. Selwyn, N. (2002). ‘E-stablishing’an inclusive society? Technology, social exclusion and UK government policy making. Journal of Social Policy, 31(01), 1-20. CRITICAL THEORY
2. Spanos, Y. E., Prastacos, G. P., & Poulymenakou, A. (2002). The relationship between information and communication technologies adoption and management. Information & Management, 39(8), 659-675. MODERNIST
3. Cukier, W., Ngwenyama, O., Bauer, R., & Middleton, C. (2009). A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis. Information Systems Journal, 19(2), 175-196. POSTMODERNIST
4. Ciborra, C. U., & Lanzara, G. F. (1994). Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations.Accounting, management and information technologies, 4(2), 61-86. SYMBOLLIC INTERPRETIVIST
Based on your selected pers ...
ENG 200 Effective Communication/tutorialrank.comjonhson277
This document provides instructions for an ENG 200 course assignment on assessing arguments. Students are asked to review three sample essays demonstrating different argument styles, then choose one to evaluate using strategies from their textbook. They must write a minimum 350-word assessment of the chosen essay, identifying the author, thesis, organization effectiveness, argument methods, response to other arguments, and timeliness. They must also include a relevant quote from the essay.
This document provides tips for students on writing an individual learning log essay that is self-reflective and draws from two speakers' presentations. It outlines the requirements of the 2,000-word essay including an abstract, structure with subheadings, use of academic sources to support arguments, and reflective language. Students are encouraged to choose topics they find interesting and link their arguments through a theme or their own reflection.
UNSW Masters of Business and Technology Study Skills presentation given as a webinar. NOTE: An earlier version is also available as an open course on Blackboard CourseSites. Please note this PowerPoint version is not CCSA licensed. ZTo ask for permission to use or to issue a takedown notice please contact a.chambers@unsw.edu.au
- The document provides an overview and instructions for assignments in PSY 405 Theories of Personality course, including creating brochures and presentations comparing various psychodynamic theories, worksheets on humanistic and existential theories, a newspaper article on dispositional and evolutionary theories, and presentations and papers analyzing different personality theories.
- Students are asked to analyze and compare theories like Freud, Jung, Adler, Maslow, Rogers, and learning/cognitive theorists through various written and multimedia assignments.
- The assignments require outlining key aspects of theories, their strengths/weaknesses, and how they explain personality and relationships.
This document provides an overview of the Literary Theory course taught by Dr. Gerald R. Lucas. There are three major requirements: class participation, weekly reading responses, and leading one class discussion on an assigned reading. The course will survey literary theory from ancient Greece through contemporary theories. It will examine works challengingly and engage students to better understand literature and theoretical discourse. A tentative schedule outlines the theories to be covered each week throughout the semester.
The first lecture for a semester-long introductory psychology unit of study (tertiary-level). This is one half of a year long unit. Approx. 1/3rd of the lectures are on slideshare. Others were by guest lecturers.
Slides from the NW part-time researcher workshop on 1 November featuring sessions on academic writing styles and getting the best from a part-time supervisor. This workshop was hosted by the University of Chester (Warrington campus) and facilitated by Emma Gillaspy and Moira Peelo
CHLD 113: Philosophy Statement
Student Learning Outcome
This assignment is designed to assess the following student learning outcome (SLO):
Compare and contrast various theoretical frameworks that relate to the study of human development.
Developing Your Personal Philosophy
The Philosophy Statement assignment provides an opportunity to review the theoretical perspectives discussed throughout this semester. In a 3-5 page paper (excluding title page, abstract, and references) you will argue which theories you believe best explain how children think, learn, grow, and develop.
A philosophy is a set of beliefs about how children develop and learn. This is an individualized statement that is based on core values and beliefs. These are related to your beliefs about the nature and purpose of life, your role and calling in life, and your relationship and responsibilities to others. A philosophy is more than an opinion; it is based on theoretical frameworks, as well as empirical data. Understanding and applying this information is valuable, but ultimately you have to decide what you personally believe and why you believe that. Moment by moment, day by day, what you believe impacts what you will teach and how you will teach it.
Review
: Review the five theoretical perspectives discussed throughout the text. Re-read chapter two, then review the concepts in other chapters that discuss development in terms of the theories. For example, Berger (the author) comes back to Piaget and Vygotsky in the chapters on cognitive development (especially in chapters 9 and 12), and comes back to Erikson (and sometimes Freud) in the chapters on psychosocial development. She reviews theories when she discusses language learning (chapter 6), infant development (chapter 7), and gender roles (chapter 10). The theories are woven throughout the text. Also review the lecture and PowerPoint slides posted in the Chapter 2 learning unit folder. In addition, the “Additional Resources” section of chapter two lists numerous videos and websites that will help you better understand the theories
Reflect and Select
: Spend time thinking and talking about the various theories and brainstorm points you want to make in your philosophy statement. Write an outline or web to help you organize your ideas before you start writing your actual essay. You do not need to use every part of every theory in your paper. Some students are eclectic and use some aspect of each theory. Some students select several theories and focus on specific aspects of those theories.
For this assignment you are required to use a minimum of three theories
(can be parts of a theory – such as social learning from behaviorism, information processing from cognitive, and Freud from psychoanalytic). The possibilities are endless within the five major theories, but here are some aspects of the theories that previous students have incorporated into their philosophy statements:
Psychoanalytic Theory
Freud’s concepts (unco.
This document outlines the syllabus for an online English 102 course titled "Writing About Place & Identity" taught during the summer of 2019. The course focuses on applying principles of expository and argumentative essay writing through exploring how one's environment shapes their life and identity. Major assignments include a personal narrative essay, annotated bibliography, exploratory research essay, and op-ed essay. The course aims to help students develop composition and research skills to communicate effectively for different audiences and contexts. It provides learning outcomes, assignment requirements and deadlines, grading policies, textbook information, and instructor contact details.
essay PowerPoint notes in introduction of CARDkristinso
This document provides information and guidelines for an individual assignment on discipline-based studies for a tutorial. Students are asked to write a 500-600 word essay responding to the prompt: "Has social media in virtual reality become an arena of 'Post-truth' which operates as consistent guidance for youth's behaviour and vision? Are critical thinking and reasoning the useful means to help the youth to cope with the 'post-truth' era?" The document outlines the assessment criteria, submission process, and tips for writing an argumentative essay to score well.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
1. University
Course
of
Syllabus
Phoenix
PSY 405
Please print a copy of this syllabus for handy reference.
Whenever there is a question about what assignments are due, please remember
this syllabus is considered the ruling document.
GENERAL COURSE INFORMATION
COURSE NUMBER: PSY 405
COURSE TITLE:Theories of Personality
COURSE START DATE:11/27/2012
COURSE END DATE:01/14/2013
REQUIRED READING: Students are required to read all materials available at the
Course Materials site for this course on http://ecampus.phoenix.edu.
Facilitator Information
Barry Brooks PhD
barrybrooksphd@gmail.com (University of Phoenix)
barrybrooksphd@gmail.com (Personal)
509.279.3328(PST)
Facilitator Availability
I am available from 9 a.m.-9 p.m. Central Time on most days, but I attempt to reserve
Sunday for my family. During the week, I am online most of the time during 9 a.m.-9
p.m. On Saturdays, I tend to be online in the morning only. If these times are not
convenient for you, please let me know. I will be happy to accommodate your schedule,
if possible. I provide you with these times to make it easier to communicate with me,
and not to limit our contact. I want you to know that, should you need to contact me
outside these time frames, you should not hesitate to do so. My contact phone number
is listed in my signature on each post in the course room (509) 279-3328.
For emergencies, when you are not able to gain access to messages on the Online
Learning System (OLS), please send a message to my personal email address.
2. General Course Description
This course surveys the field of personality from a scientific perspective, examining the
general approaches to understanding personality. The key theorists and concepts
associated with each perspective are highlighted, along with the strengths and
limitations of the different approaches.
Course Objectives
See Course Objectives in the Course Materials for this course.
The Online Weekly Schedule
Electronic weeks begin on Tuesday and ends on Monday at Midnight (Mountain Time
Zone).
Day 1 – Tuesday
Day 2 – Wednesday
Day 3 – Thursday
Day 4 – Friday
Day 5 – Saturday
Day 6 – Sunday
Day 7 – Monday
Where to Go to Class: Your Course Forums
Main Forum: This is the main forum for the class and is where discussion is conducted.
It has read-and-write access for everyone.
Chat-Room Forum: This is a read-and-write access forum. It is designed as a place to
discuss issues not related to the course content. This is the forum to which we will send
our bios.
Course-Materials Forum: This is a read-only forum, which means you can read
messages here but cannot send any. This is where I will post the course syllabus and
materials.
Learning-Team-A, B, C, D and E: These five Learning Team forums will be used as
workrooms for the learning teams. You will be assigned to one of these learning teams.
Individual Forum: You will see one forum with your name on it. This is a private forum,
shared only by you and me, the facilitator. Your classmates will not have access to this
forum.
3. Point Values for Course Assignments
ASSIGNMENTS Points
Individual (70%)
Participation (Answering DQ’s, WKLY Summary, 20
Responding to Classmates DQ Responses. All five
weeks = 4 points each week @ 2 points for participation
classroom discussions &2 points for DQ responses)
WK 1 Introductions to Personality Paper 15
WK 2 Personality Overview Paper 15
WK 4Personality Analysis 20
Learning Team (30%)
Psychodynamic Personality Theories MatrixWK 2 7
Humanistic and Existential Personality Theories Matrix 7
WK 3
Dispositional Personality Theories Matrix WK 4 8
Learning Personality Theories Matrix WK 5 8
Total 100
GRADING
Feedback
Each week, I will provide grades or scores and comments on assignments within 6 days
of when they were due. I will send feedback to your Individual Forum. After I send
feedback each week, I will post a notification in the Main Forum. All graded papers
need to be written and cited in APA format as summarized in APA Sixth Edition. Each
paper is to include the following: Title Page, Intro, Text/Body, Headings (Level I’s &
III’s), Citations, Conclusion, and Reference Page (3-5 References=including
Course text Material). The Matrix Assignmentsmust have a Title Page &
Reference Page (incorporate 3-5 citation sources in the Matrix). Combine each
weekly Matrix into one document. Remember that you’re writing research papers
4. not opinion papers. So, make sure to connect your papers with the course
readings.
Grading Formula
Points Grade
95+ A
90-94 A-
87-89 B+
84-86 B
80-83 B-
77-79 C+
74-76 C
70-73 C-
67-69 D+
64-66 D
60-63 D-
<59 F
Partial points will be rounded to the nearest full point; for example, 83.4=83 leads to a
grade of B-; and 83.5=84 leads to a grade of B.
5. ASSIGNMENTS
Week 1 Assignments
Weekly Summaries
Weekly summaries will be required in this course and counted as class participation.
Discussion Questions
Only posts in the Main classroom forum will count towards your class participation
score.
All Week: Participation (2 points) DQ’s (2 points): Remember to participate in the class
discussions 4 out of 7 days during the week.
Course Materials
Feist, J., &Feist, G. J. (2009).Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw
Hill.
All electronic materials are available on the student website.
Week One: Introduction to Personality
Details Due Points
Objectives 1.1 Define personality.
1.2 Examine theoretical approaches in studying personality.
1.3 Analyze factors that may influence an individual’s personality
development.
Readings Read Ch. 1 of Theories of Personality.
Read this week’s Electronic Reserve Readings.
Participation Participate in class discussion. Monday 2
Day 7
Discussion Respond to weekly discussion questions. Monday 2
Questions Day 7
Learning Team Resource: Learning Team Toolkit
Instructions Complete the Learning Team Charter
Individual Prepare a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you examine Monday 15
Introduction to personality theory. Address the following concepts: Day 7
6. Personality Paper
Define personality.
Examine theoretical approaches in studying personality.
Analyze factors that may influence an individual’s personality
Development. Include an APA formatted Title Page, citations,
Reference Page with 3-5 sources utilized in citations within the
Paper. Do not over rely on citing one source.
Week Two: Psychodynamic Personality Theories
Details Due Points
Objectives 2.1 Describe the assumptions, reliability, validity, and applications of
psychodynamic personality theories.
2.2 Analyze the strengths and limitations of psychodynamic
personality theories.
2.3 Analyze individual personality characteristics, using
psychodynamic personality theories.
2.4 Explain interpersonal relations, using psychodynamic
personality theories.
Readings Read Ch. 2–6 & 8 of Theories of Personality.
Read this week’s Electronic Reserve Readings.
Participation Participate in class discussion. Monday 2
Day 7
Discussion Respond to weekly discussion questions. Monday 2
Questions Day 7
Individual Prepare a 1050- to 1,400-word paper that is based on the theories 15
Personality of personality covered in the readings. Choose two and analyze the
Overview strengths and limitations of the theories. Compare and contrast them
in relationship to:
Basic or underlying assumptions
Deterministic versus free will
Awareness of self (e.g., conscious versus unconscious motives for
behavior). Include an APA formatted Title Page, citations,
Reference Page with 3-5 sources utilized in citations within the
Paper. Do not over rely on citing one source.
Learning Team Complete the Psychodynamic Personality Theories Matrix, using Monday 7
Psychodynamic the text, the University Library, the Internet, and other resources. Day 7
Personality Theories
Matrix Prepare a 700- to 1,050-word analysis of the strengths and
limitations of the theories listed in explaining individuals’ behavior.
Address the following:
Describe how psychodynamic theories affect individual
personalities.Explain how psychodynamic theories influence
interpersonal relationships.
7. Attach your matrix to your analysis when you submit it to your
faculty. Include an APA formatted Title Page, citations, Reference
Page with 3-5 sources utilized in citations within the Matrix.
Week Three: Humanistic and Existential Personality Theories
Details Due Points
Objectives 3.1 Describe the assumptions, reliability, validity, and applications of
humanistic and existential personality theories.
3.2 Analyze the strengths and limitations of humanistic and
existential personality theories.
3.3 Analyze individual personality characteristics, using humanistic
and existential personality theories.
3.4 Explain interpersonal relations, using humanistic and existential
personality theories.
Readings Read Ch. 10–12 of Theories of Personality.
Read this week’s Electronic Reserve Readings.
Participation Participate in class discussion. Monday 2
Day 7
Discussion Respond to weekly discussion questions. Monday 2
Questions Day 7
Learning Team Complete the Humanistic and Existential Personality Theories Monday 7
Humanistic and Matrix, using the text, the University Library, the Internet, and other Day 7
Existential resources.
Personality Theories
Matrix Prepare a 700- to 1,050-word analysis of the strengths and
limitations of the theories listed in explaining individuals’ behavior.
Address the following:
Analyzehow humanistic and existential theories affect individual
personalities.
Explain how humanistic and existential theories influence
interpersonal relationships.
Attach your matrix (include previous week’s Matrix with
improvements) to your analysis when you submit it to your facilitator.
Include an APA formatted Title Page, citations, Reference Page with
3-5 sources utilized in citations within the Matrix.
8. Week Four: Dispositional Personality Theories
Details Due Points
Objectives 4.1 Describe the assumptions, reliability, validity, and applications of
dispositional personality theories.
4.2 Analyze the strengths and limitations of dispositional personality
theories.
4.3 Analyze individual personality characteristics, using dispositional
personality theories.
4.4 Explain interpersonal relations, using dispositional personality
theories.
Readings Read Ch. 13 & 14 of Theories of Personality.
Read this week’s Electronic Reserve Readings.
Participation Participate in class discussion. Monday 2
Day 7
Discussion Respond to weekly discussion questions. Monday 2
Questions Day 7
Individual Select two of the following theoretical approaches: psychodynamic, Monday 20
Personality Analysis humanistic and existential, dispositional, or learning. Make sure the Day 7
two selected are not the same as from Week Two.
Obtain faculty approval.
Prepare a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you compare and
contrast the theories selected. Address the following items:
Describe the role of personality in affecting situational
behavior.
Examine the personality characteristics attributed to each of
the theories in your approach.
Explain the interpersonal relational aspects associated with
the theories selected.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Three-
Five References
Include an APA formatted Title Page, citations,
Reference Page with 3-5 sources utilized in citations within the
Paper. Do not over rely on citing one source.
Learning Team Complete the Dispositional Personality Theories Matrix, using the Monday 8
Dispositional text, the University Library, the Internet, and other resources. Day 7
Personality Theories
Matrix Prepare a 700- to 1,050-word analysis of the strengths and
limitations of the theories listed in explaining individuals’ behavior.
Address the following:
Describe how dispositional theories affect individual personalities.
Explain how dispositional theories influence interpersonal
relationships.
9. Attach your matrix (include previous weeks) to your analysis when
you submit it to your facilitator. Include an APA formatted Title
Page, citations, Reference Page with 3-5 sources utilized in citations
within the Matrix.
Week Five: Learning Personality Theories
Details Due Points
Objectives 5.1 Describe the assumptions, reliability, validity, and applications of
learning personality theories.
5.2 Analyze the strengths and limitations of learning personality
theories.
5.3 Analyze individual personality characteristics, using learning
personality theories.
5.4 Explain interpersonal relations, using psychodynamic learning
personality theories.
Readings Read Ch. 15–17 of Theories of Personality.
Read this week’s Electronic Reserve Readings.
Participation Participate in class discussion. Monday 2
Day 7
Discussion Respond to weekly discussion questions. Monday 2
Questions Day 7
Learning Team Complete the Learning Personality Theories Matrix, using the text, Monday 8
Learning Personality the University Library, the Internet, and other resources. Day 7
Theories Matrix
Prepare a 700- to 1,050-word analysis of the strengths and
limitations of the theories listed in explaining individuals’ behavior.
Address the following:
Describe how learning theories affect individual personalities.
Explain how learning theories influence interpersonal relationships.
Attach your matrix (including all previous week’s) to your analysis
when you submit it to your facilitator Include an APA formatted Title
Page, citations, Reference Page with 3-5 sources utilized in citations
within the Matrix. Please include each week’s matrix in the final
copy turned into the instructor.