Kathleen Ferguson |
           3114056
Social Networking
     Defined

“
    web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public
    or semi-public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list
    of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view
    and traverse their list of connections and those made by others
    within the system.”
                                                  (boyd & Ellison, 2007)
Layman’s Terms
    Social networking
   exists in the online
     environment and
 allows individuals to
connect with people,
       share thoughts,
      feelings, photos,
    videos and audio.
Social
Networking
in 5 Words
Recipe to Social Network

Ingredients:
   Social network site of your choosing
   Personality
   Friends
   Photos, videos and any other visual aids
   Thoughts & feelings

Method:
  Join a social networking site –
  Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, etc., if you haven’t already. Add
  a handful of friends and stir. Season with a little personality.
  Upload photos, videos and any other visual aids to assist in
  your profile’s development. Whisk in your thoughts & feelings
  into multiple status updates. Voila!
A key ingredient to social networking
                  is...




                 Or

   Impression Management
Social networking & impression management
              go hand in hand.
Impression Management:

 Refers to the process of consciously
 controlling information in order to
 lead others’ opinions or perceptions
    in favour of personal or social
                 goals.


We could call this, ‘self PR?’
When we construct a
profile on our social
networking site, we are
controlling what
information we want
people to know about
ourselves; we are
managing the
impression we make on
other people.
Social media endorses impression management.
How
The process of collating information to
 present in your personal profile is called
        impression management.

   “Profiles tell us how people choose to
portray themselves when asked explicitly to
                     do so.”

                              (Barash, et al., 2010)
“By looking at others’ profiles, teens
get a sense of what types of
presentations are socially appropriate;
others’ profiles provide critical cues
about what to present on their own
profile”.

                               (boyd, 2007)
Learning how to manage impressions is a
valuable social skill acquired only through
experience. This process begins as
children and further develops as adults.
                                  (boyd, 2007)
As social networks are still a relatively new
technology, the process of impression
management within these sites is still a
new concept.
In the context of
  social networking
sites, body language
and tone of voice are
   not immediately
visible and the skills
    people need to
 interpret situations
     and manage
   impressions are
       different.


              (boyd, 2007)
Although we try to manage impressions, often
people may misinterpret what we are trying to
                                     convey.
When we post status updates or tweets, we encode a
certain message we wish to portray.
However, our declared friends may
    decode our message in the
         unintended way.
5
There are identified dimensions
     of impression management.
                       (Barash, et al., 2010)
Ingratiation

A conscious attempt to beautify or perfect one’s image in the eyes of another.
2
Intimidation




               Enough said...
Self-promotion
Exemplification (appearing
        virtuous)
Supplication (looking weak to engender help)
Another key ingredient to social
                 networking is...

                FRIENDS!!!!!
Facebook friends, or friends in any other
social networking site, interact with, and
provide feedback to your profile and
postings.
Golder, et al.
recently conducted
a study on Facebook
and found that
users only ‘poke’
and message a small
number of people,
despite the large
amount of declared
‘Facebook friends’.


    (Golder, et al., 2007: Huberman, et al. 2009)
So why all the friends, if you aren’t
going to interact with them?
It all has to do with popularity,
self-esteem and acceptance. The
more friends we declare on our
profile, the cooler we look...



       ...or so we like to think!
This then leads us to self-esteem!
Yes, self-esteem issues are present in online
 social networks as well. Sorry people, we
             can’t escape them!
Research has found self-
esteem levels in adolescence
who social network are
directly related to the tone of
responses received to
information posted on
personal profiles...


                 (Pempek et al., 2009)
As such, adolescence groups engage with
social networking sites to gauge peer opinions
of themselves and to seek peer acceptance
which ultimately leads to the formation of one’s
identity.
                                   (Pempek et al., 2009)
“
    By early 2006, many
    considered
    participation on the
    key social network
    site, MySpace, esse
    ntial to being seen
    as cool at school.”

         (boyd, 2007, p.1)




Although, let’s face it, the cool
kids would never say, cool at
school.
Did you know?


People who receive attention from multiple
people will post more often than people who
           receive little attention.
                                 (Huberman, et al. 2009)
As a result, people with more declared friends
        will network more frequently.

  This can be likened to life outside of social
   media, those who have more friends will
   socialise more, than those who do not.
Random Fact # 1



         “
             Across the globe
             over the past
             year (2010)
             average time
             spent on social
             networking sites
             grew from 3
             hours per month
             to 5.5 hours.”
                    (Joe’s Blogg, 2011)
Random Fact # 2


In 2011, Facebook’s user-base hit in
excess of 640 million users – half of
which login daily.


                             (Joe’s Blogg, 2011)
Random Fact # 3



 “   Facebook was
     the most-
     searched term
     in 2010 for the
     second year
     running.”
              (Charlton, 2011)
And there you have it.


Social networking online is
        here to stay.

   Although there are so many deeper
elements to social networking, at the end
of the day the beauty is, communicating
   with friends is now easier than ever.
For an interesting video on social
 media facts for 2011, click the
          image below.
References
boyd, dm & Ellison, NB 2007, ‘Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship’, Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication, vol 13, no. 1, viewed 19 October
2011, <http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html >.
Pempel, TA, Yermolayeya YA, Calvert SL 2009, ‘College students’ social networking experiences on
Facebook’, Journal of Applied Development Psychology, vol. 30, pp. 227-238.

Joe, 2010, Joe’s Blogg, weblog, viewed 20 October
2011, <http://www.joesblogg.com/2010/03/social-media-usage-statistics-2010/>.

Charlton, G, 2011, Econsultancy Digital Marketers United, weblog, viewed 20 October
2011, <http://econsultancy.com/us/blog/8175-10-fantastic-facebook-infographics>.

boyd, d 2007, ‘Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage
Social Life’, MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning – Youth, Identity, and Digital Media
Volume, (ed. David Buckingham). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Barash, V, Ducheneaut, N, Isaacs, E & Bellotti, V, 2010, ‘Faceplant: Impression (Mis)management in
Facebook Status Updates’, Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs
and Social Media, Association of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 207-210

Huberman, BA, Romero, DM & Wu, F 2009, ‘Social networks that matter: Twitter under the
microscope’, Peer Reviewed Journal on the Internet, vol. 14, no. 1-5

Production Project

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Social Networking Defined “ web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system.” (boyd & Ellison, 2007)
  • 3.
    Layman’s Terms Social networking exists in the online environment and allows individuals to connect with people, share thoughts, feelings, photos, videos and audio.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Recipe to SocialNetwork Ingredients: Social network site of your choosing Personality Friends Photos, videos and any other visual aids Thoughts & feelings Method: Join a social networking site – Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, etc., if you haven’t already. Add a handful of friends and stir. Season with a little personality. Upload photos, videos and any other visual aids to assist in your profile’s development. Whisk in your thoughts & feelings into multiple status updates. Voila!
  • 7.
    A key ingredientto social networking is... Or Impression Management
  • 8.
    Social networking &impression management go hand in hand.
  • 9.
    Impression Management: Refersto the process of consciously controlling information in order to lead others’ opinions or perceptions in favour of personal or social goals. We could call this, ‘self PR?’
  • 10.
    When we constructa profile on our social networking site, we are controlling what information we want people to know about ourselves; we are managing the impression we make on other people.
  • 11.
    Social media endorsesimpression management.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    The process ofcollating information to present in your personal profile is called impression management. “Profiles tell us how people choose to portray themselves when asked explicitly to do so.” (Barash, et al., 2010)
  • 14.
    “By looking atothers’ profiles, teens get a sense of what types of presentations are socially appropriate; others’ profiles provide critical cues about what to present on their own profile”. (boyd, 2007)
  • 15.
    Learning how tomanage impressions is a valuable social skill acquired only through experience. This process begins as children and further develops as adults. (boyd, 2007)
  • 16.
    As social networksare still a relatively new technology, the process of impression management within these sites is still a new concept.
  • 17.
    In the contextof social networking sites, body language and tone of voice are not immediately visible and the skills people need to interpret situations and manage impressions are different. (boyd, 2007)
  • 18.
    Although we tryto manage impressions, often people may misinterpret what we are trying to convey.
  • 19.
    When we poststatus updates or tweets, we encode a certain message we wish to portray.
  • 20.
    However, our declaredfriends may decode our message in the unintended way.
  • 21.
    5 There are identifieddimensions of impression management. (Barash, et al., 2010)
  • 22.
    Ingratiation A conscious attemptto beautify or perfect one’s image in the eyes of another.
  • 23.
    2 Intimidation Enough said...
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Supplication (looking weakto engender help)
  • 27.
    Another key ingredientto social networking is... FRIENDS!!!!!
  • 28.
    Facebook friends, orfriends in any other social networking site, interact with, and provide feedback to your profile and postings.
  • 29.
    Golder, et al. recentlyconducted a study on Facebook and found that users only ‘poke’ and message a small number of people, despite the large amount of declared ‘Facebook friends’. (Golder, et al., 2007: Huberman, et al. 2009)
  • 30.
    So why allthe friends, if you aren’t going to interact with them?
  • 31.
    It all hasto do with popularity, self-esteem and acceptance. The more friends we declare on our profile, the cooler we look... ...or so we like to think!
  • 32.
    This then leadsus to self-esteem!
  • 33.
    Yes, self-esteem issuesare present in online social networks as well. Sorry people, we can’t escape them!
  • 34.
    Research has foundself- esteem levels in adolescence who social network are directly related to the tone of responses received to information posted on personal profiles... (Pempek et al., 2009)
  • 35.
    As such, adolescencegroups engage with social networking sites to gauge peer opinions of themselves and to seek peer acceptance which ultimately leads to the formation of one’s identity. (Pempek et al., 2009)
  • 36.
    By early 2006, many considered participation on the key social network site, MySpace, esse ntial to being seen as cool at school.” (boyd, 2007, p.1) Although, let’s face it, the cool kids would never say, cool at school.
  • 37.
    Did you know? Peoplewho receive attention from multiple people will post more often than people who receive little attention. (Huberman, et al. 2009)
  • 38.
    As a result,people with more declared friends will network more frequently. This can be likened to life outside of social media, those who have more friends will socialise more, than those who do not.
  • 39.
    Random Fact #1 “ Across the globe over the past year (2010) average time spent on social networking sites grew from 3 hours per month to 5.5 hours.” (Joe’s Blogg, 2011)
  • 40.
    Random Fact #2 In 2011, Facebook’s user-base hit in excess of 640 million users – half of which login daily. (Joe’s Blogg, 2011)
  • 41.
    Random Fact #3 “ Facebook was the most- searched term in 2010 for the second year running.” (Charlton, 2011)
  • 42.
    And there youhave it. Social networking online is here to stay. Although there are so many deeper elements to social networking, at the end of the day the beauty is, communicating with friends is now easier than ever.
  • 43.
    For an interestingvideo on social media facts for 2011, click the image below.
  • 44.
    References boyd, dm &Ellison, NB 2007, ‘Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol 13, no. 1, viewed 19 October 2011, <http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html >. Pempel, TA, Yermolayeya YA, Calvert SL 2009, ‘College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook’, Journal of Applied Development Psychology, vol. 30, pp. 227-238. Joe, 2010, Joe’s Blogg, weblog, viewed 20 October 2011, <http://www.joesblogg.com/2010/03/social-media-usage-statistics-2010/>. Charlton, G, 2011, Econsultancy Digital Marketers United, weblog, viewed 20 October 2011, <http://econsultancy.com/us/blog/8175-10-fantastic-facebook-infographics>. boyd, d 2007, ‘Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life’, MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning – Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume, (ed. David Buckingham). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Barash, V, Ducheneaut, N, Isaacs, E & Bellotti, V, 2010, ‘Faceplant: Impression (Mis)management in Facebook Status Updates’, Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Association of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 207-210 Huberman, BA, Romero, DM & Wu, F 2009, ‘Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope’, Peer Reviewed Journal on the Internet, vol. 14, no. 1-5