The document is a report summarizing findings from a survey of dermatology and plastic surgery services across local health boards in Wales. It finds that while most health boards provided limited data, available information shows a steady increase in referrals to dermatology services from 2010-2015. There was also an increase in both new and follow-up dermatology patients over this period. However, the number of dermatology day surgery cases showed no major rise across health boards from 2010-2015. The report aims to inform policymakers about skin health services in Wales.
The document discusses the need for integrated healthcare to address rising costs and the challenges posed by aging populations and chronic diseases. It notes that global healthcare spending is increasing at over 8% annually, driven largely by increased spending on drugs, hospitals, physicians, and longer lifespans. Integrated care approaches that coordinate across providers and care settings can help improve outcomes and reduce inefficiency. The document outlines different models of integrated care and trends in global healthcare systems moving towards integration. It argues that new data sources, analytics and technologies like IBM's Watson platform can provide insights to help transform healthcare delivery through more proactive, personalized and collaborative approaches.
The document discusses implementing chronic disease prevention and management frameworks in Canada. It notes that chronic diseases are a major cause of death and disability in Canada, costing $45 billion annually. The goals of chronic disease prevention and management frameworks are to reduce care discontinuities, increase prevention behaviors, improve population health, and reduce costs through a coordinated, systems approach. However, the document outlines several issues with implementing these frameworks in Canada, including a lack of governance to support inter-organizational collaboration, incomplete examples and evidence to support all aspects of the frameworks, and discontinuities in care due to a lack of integration between organizations.
eHealth Summit: "EU Address: The EU eHealth Strategy: Connecting Member State...3GDR
Slides from National eHealth Summit, 30 Sept 2015 at Carton House, Kildare: Dr Tapani Phia, Head of Unit, eHealth & Health Technology Assessment, European Commission.
#eHealthSummit15
http://www.ehealthsummit.ie
http://mhealthinsight.com/2015/09/25/mhealth-insights-from-the-ehealth-summit/
The document discusses primary health care (PHC) and its importance in the Canadian health system. It outlines the key principles of PHC, including accessibility, public participation, health promotion, appropriate technology, and intersectoral cooperation. While primary care focuses on clinical services and treatment, PHC takes a more holistic approach to consider various social and environmental factors that influence health. The Canadian Nurses Association has advocated for a health system based on PHC and involved nurses in various initiatives to better integrate PHC in practice.
This paper presents analysis of a Kent ‘whole population’ dataset, linking wholepopulation demographics with activity and cost data for the population from acute, community, mental health and social care providers. The data helps commissioners to understand the impact of different selections methods for people with ‘very complex’ health and social care needs, particularly in relation to the development of a LTC year of care currency.
This document should be seen alongside the ‘Recovery, Rehabilitation and Reablement – step-by-step guide’ which describes how providers can carry out the audit in their own organisation. Other documents and learning materials This document is part of a suite of learning materials being produced by the LTC Year of Care Commissioning Programme to support the spread and adoption of capitated budgets for people with complex care needs.
1115 aine carroll clinical leaders forum nhc integrated care turning healthca...investnethealthcare
This document summarizes a presentation on integrated care given at the National Healthcare Conference in 2015. It discusses different types of integrated care including horizontal, vertical, and within sectors. Integrated care aims to provide coordinated services across providers and settings to support patients. Barriers to integrated care include fragmentation, distrust, and lack of coordination between strategy and operations. National clinical programs in Ireland have led to improved outcomes for conditions like heart attacks, surgery, and stroke through more integrated models of care. However, challenges remain around resources, hierarchies, and fully implementing integrated approaches across the healthcare system.
The document discusses the need for integrated healthcare to address rising costs and the challenges posed by aging populations and chronic diseases. It notes that global healthcare spending is increasing at over 8% annually, driven largely by increased spending on drugs, hospitals, physicians, and longer lifespans. Integrated care approaches that coordinate across providers and care settings can help improve outcomes and reduce inefficiency. The document outlines different models of integrated care and trends in global healthcare systems moving towards integration. It argues that new data sources, analytics and technologies like IBM's Watson platform can provide insights to help transform healthcare delivery through more proactive, personalized and collaborative approaches.
The document discusses implementing chronic disease prevention and management frameworks in Canada. It notes that chronic diseases are a major cause of death and disability in Canada, costing $45 billion annually. The goals of chronic disease prevention and management frameworks are to reduce care discontinuities, increase prevention behaviors, improve population health, and reduce costs through a coordinated, systems approach. However, the document outlines several issues with implementing these frameworks in Canada, including a lack of governance to support inter-organizational collaboration, incomplete examples and evidence to support all aspects of the frameworks, and discontinuities in care due to a lack of integration between organizations.
eHealth Summit: "EU Address: The EU eHealth Strategy: Connecting Member State...3GDR
Slides from National eHealth Summit, 30 Sept 2015 at Carton House, Kildare: Dr Tapani Phia, Head of Unit, eHealth & Health Technology Assessment, European Commission.
#eHealthSummit15
http://www.ehealthsummit.ie
http://mhealthinsight.com/2015/09/25/mhealth-insights-from-the-ehealth-summit/
The document discusses primary health care (PHC) and its importance in the Canadian health system. It outlines the key principles of PHC, including accessibility, public participation, health promotion, appropriate technology, and intersectoral cooperation. While primary care focuses on clinical services and treatment, PHC takes a more holistic approach to consider various social and environmental factors that influence health. The Canadian Nurses Association has advocated for a health system based on PHC and involved nurses in various initiatives to better integrate PHC in practice.
This paper presents analysis of a Kent ‘whole population’ dataset, linking wholepopulation demographics with activity and cost data for the population from acute, community, mental health and social care providers. The data helps commissioners to understand the impact of different selections methods for people with ‘very complex’ health and social care needs, particularly in relation to the development of a LTC year of care currency.
This document should be seen alongside the ‘Recovery, Rehabilitation and Reablement – step-by-step guide’ which describes how providers can carry out the audit in their own organisation. Other documents and learning materials This document is part of a suite of learning materials being produced by the LTC Year of Care Commissioning Programme to support the spread and adoption of capitated budgets for people with complex care needs.
1115 aine carroll clinical leaders forum nhc integrated care turning healthca...investnethealthcare
This document summarizes a presentation on integrated care given at the National Healthcare Conference in 2015. It discusses different types of integrated care including horizontal, vertical, and within sectors. Integrated care aims to provide coordinated services across providers and settings to support patients. Barriers to integrated care include fragmentation, distrust, and lack of coordination between strategy and operations. National clinical programs in Ireland have led to improved outcomes for conditions like heart attacks, surgery, and stroke through more integrated models of care. However, challenges remain around resources, hierarchies, and fully implementing integrated approaches across the healthcare system.
The document discusses New Zealand's national eHealth initiatives and priorities. It outlines the goals of establishing a core set of personal health information for all New Zealanders electronically by 2014 to improve healthcare quality and safety. Key programs include implementing health identity standards, developing universal medication lists and e-prescribing capabilities, and establishing clinical data repositories accessible across care settings. Governance involves multiple groups providing oversight and accountability for achieving the eHealth plan.
This document outlines Denmark's national strategy for digitizing the healthcare sector from 2013-2017. The strategy's goals are to deliver healthcare services in new ways through telemedicine and digital tools that involve patients, provide digital access to healthcare information and services for citizens, and use digital solutions to enhance care quality and efficiency. Key initiatives include nationwide deployment of telemedical ulcer assessment and telepsychiatry, establishing a national telemedicine infrastructure, and piloting self-booking of hospital appointments through digital tools. The strategy aims to fully leverage existing digital health systems and realize the benefits of digitization for both patients and healthcare providers.
1200 colm henry voluntary hospital forum final draft may 2015investnethealthcare
This document discusses several challenges facing the healthcare system including health inequality, the changing role of hospitals in Ireland and internationally, and the push toward integrated care due to demographic factors. It notes that hospitals are increasingly expected to work more closely with primary care, social care, and community services to provide coordinated care across settings. Internationally, some healthcare systems like Kaiser Permanente in the US have reduced costs by emphasizing preventive care and shifting care delivery out of hospitals when possible. The growing elderly population is also increasing cost pressures on healthcare systems.
The document discusses Catalonia's transition from a chronic care program to an integrated health and social care model. It describes Catalonia's healthcare system and the aging population it serves. It outlines strategic projects from the 2011-2015 Health Plan including developing integrated care pathways and classifying complex chronic patients. The chronic care program aims to identify these complex patients and develop shared intervention plans incorporating health and social needs. Risk stratification tools are used to segment the population and identify those at high risk of hospitalization. [/SUMMARY]
Thailand has made progress toward developing its national eHealth system but still faces challenges. The country has high adoption of health IT by providers but fragmented systems. Experts recommend prioritizing eHealth foundations like governance, standards, and privacy laws. In response, Thailand established a National Health Information Committee and is developing standards. Moving forward, partnerships, research, and capacity building will help Thailand achieve interoperable health information exchange.
The purpose of this briefing is to help you to identify the immediate priority actions to commission effective end of life care.
Publication by the National End of Life Programme which became part of NHS Improving Quality in May 2013
This document discusses and compares public and private health care. Private health care has more equipped and personalized care with new technology and shorter wait times, but is limited to those with certain insurance and can refuse patients. Public health care cannot turn patients away and is more affordable and free, but has fewer medical supplies and personnel resulting in longer wait times. The document argues that private health care may be more efficient and sustainable than public health care in developing countries.
Occupational health and primary health care in ThailandHealth and Labour
1) Nearly two-thirds of Thailand's working population are informal workers who face high risks of occupational diseases and injuries but have difficulty accessing occupational health services.
2) The Bureau of Occupational and Environmental Diseases developed a project to integrate basic occupational health services into primary care units to improve access for informal workers.
3) An evaluation found the primary care units were able to provide some basic occupational health activities and over 700,000 farmers received services, demonstrating the potential of this integrated model.
Long term conditions like diabetes place a large burden on healthcare systems. A study in Yorkshire examined experiences providing care for long term conditions. It found that telehealth interventions can reduce hospital admissions, bed days, and costs while improving patients' quality of life. The Whole System Demonstrator Programme trial of telehealth and telecare in various UK regions showed a 45% reduction in mortality rates and 20% fewer emergency admissions among other benefits. Telehealth represents an opportunity to deliver more specialized care while reducing strain on hospitals and caregivers.
Health Record Banks are Essential for Effective Health Information Infrastruc...WCIT 2014
The document discusses how current health information exchange efforts are failing to achieve comprehensive electronic patient records and effective prevention and population health. It proposes that health record banks can address these challenges by providing a centralized repository for complete patient records, incentivizing electronic health record adoption, and generating revenue to fund prevention services. The Health and Prevention Promotion Initiative (HAPPI) would combine a community prevention organization with a health record bank in order to achieve the goals of a successful health information infrastructure and the "Triple Aim" of better health, better care, and lower costs. Next steps include piloting HAPPI programs with external funding and disseminating lessons learned.
The document summarizes eHealth in Denmark, outlining its vision of providing coherent clinical pathways through the healthcare system focused on patient needs. It notes that digitalization is key to giving healthcare professionals access to patient data across the system. Denmark has several eHealth solutions in place and aims to better integrate and streamline how patient data is accessed and shared. The healthcare system in Denmark is decentralized and universal, with regions and municipalities responsible for providing most services like hospitals, general practitioners, and dental care.
HealthCare System in Thailand:Past -
Present and Where is the Future ?
Dr. Pradit Sintavanarong
Minister of Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
ริชมอนด์ 11-10-56
This document discusses telehealth models in 21st century healthcare. It provides an overview of telehealth definitions and benefits, including improving access to care for aging and chronic disease populations. The University of Virginia Center for Telehealth is presented as a case study, serving over 41,000 patients across Virginia through telestroke, telepsychiatry, tele-ophthalmology and remote patient monitoring programs. The document concludes with discussing needed policy changes to improve Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and licensing requirements to further support telehealth expansion.
Integrated care aims to provide proactive, coordinated care for patients through collaboration between health sectors. It involves collecting common patient data, stratifying patients by risk level, and creating joint care plans in cross-sector teams. The goals are to improve the patient experience through more coherent care, support self-management, and make the health system more sustainable by preventing unnecessary hospitalizations and costs. An integrated care project in Odense has established the necessary foundations and is currently testing collaboration models and common digital tools for elderly patients and those with mental health issues, with the first patients enrolled. The project will be fully operational on September 1, 2014 and evaluated by the end of 2015.
The document discusses how Continua and oneM2M can help develop the personal connected healthcare market. It describes the opportunity for remote monitoring and home-based care given aging populations and rising healthcare costs. Continua provides interoperability guidelines for connected health devices and data sharing. oneM2M can further enable an ecosystem by providing a common service platform and data model. Together, Continua and oneM2M allow standardized collection, distribution and application of health information to improve care coordination and outcomes.
- The document outlines Thailand's health system and recent reforms towards universal health coverage.
- Key aspects include establishing the National Health Security Office in 2003 to provide quality healthcare access for all Thai citizens. The Universal Coverage scheme was launched, replacing the previous 30 Baht policy.
- Community hospitals and health centers play an important role in implementing healthcare policies and providing easily accessible primary care services at the local level.
Wrap-up: Creating & Managing New Models of Care in ThailandBorwornsom Leerapan
This document summarizes Borwornsom Leerapan's lecture on creating and managing new models of care in Thailand. It discusses Thailand's health systems and financing, including the three main public insurance schemes (CSMBS, SSS, UCS), private insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. It also reviews levels of the health system including primary care, chronic care, palliative care, and long-term care. Key challenges addressed are rapidly rising costs, coverage only while employed, and inadequate budgets for public schemes. The lecture aims to provide lessons for improving Thailand's future health care system.
Read the final report of The Parliamentary Review about the future of health and social care in Wales. Parliamentary Review published a report which is produced in 12 months focused on the sustainability of health and social care in Wales.
https://gov.wales/topics/health/nhswales/review/?lang=en
The document discusses New Zealand's national eHealth initiatives and priorities. It outlines the goals of establishing a core set of personal health information for all New Zealanders electronically by 2014 to improve healthcare quality and safety. Key programs include implementing health identity standards, developing universal medication lists and e-prescribing capabilities, and establishing clinical data repositories accessible across care settings. Governance involves multiple groups providing oversight and accountability for achieving the eHealth plan.
This document outlines Denmark's national strategy for digitizing the healthcare sector from 2013-2017. The strategy's goals are to deliver healthcare services in new ways through telemedicine and digital tools that involve patients, provide digital access to healthcare information and services for citizens, and use digital solutions to enhance care quality and efficiency. Key initiatives include nationwide deployment of telemedical ulcer assessment and telepsychiatry, establishing a national telemedicine infrastructure, and piloting self-booking of hospital appointments through digital tools. The strategy aims to fully leverage existing digital health systems and realize the benefits of digitization for both patients and healthcare providers.
1200 colm henry voluntary hospital forum final draft may 2015investnethealthcare
This document discusses several challenges facing the healthcare system including health inequality, the changing role of hospitals in Ireland and internationally, and the push toward integrated care due to demographic factors. It notes that hospitals are increasingly expected to work more closely with primary care, social care, and community services to provide coordinated care across settings. Internationally, some healthcare systems like Kaiser Permanente in the US have reduced costs by emphasizing preventive care and shifting care delivery out of hospitals when possible. The growing elderly population is also increasing cost pressures on healthcare systems.
The document discusses Catalonia's transition from a chronic care program to an integrated health and social care model. It describes Catalonia's healthcare system and the aging population it serves. It outlines strategic projects from the 2011-2015 Health Plan including developing integrated care pathways and classifying complex chronic patients. The chronic care program aims to identify these complex patients and develop shared intervention plans incorporating health and social needs. Risk stratification tools are used to segment the population and identify those at high risk of hospitalization. [/SUMMARY]
Thailand has made progress toward developing its national eHealth system but still faces challenges. The country has high adoption of health IT by providers but fragmented systems. Experts recommend prioritizing eHealth foundations like governance, standards, and privacy laws. In response, Thailand established a National Health Information Committee and is developing standards. Moving forward, partnerships, research, and capacity building will help Thailand achieve interoperable health information exchange.
The purpose of this briefing is to help you to identify the immediate priority actions to commission effective end of life care.
Publication by the National End of Life Programme which became part of NHS Improving Quality in May 2013
This document discusses and compares public and private health care. Private health care has more equipped and personalized care with new technology and shorter wait times, but is limited to those with certain insurance and can refuse patients. Public health care cannot turn patients away and is more affordable and free, but has fewer medical supplies and personnel resulting in longer wait times. The document argues that private health care may be more efficient and sustainable than public health care in developing countries.
Occupational health and primary health care in ThailandHealth and Labour
1) Nearly two-thirds of Thailand's working population are informal workers who face high risks of occupational diseases and injuries but have difficulty accessing occupational health services.
2) The Bureau of Occupational and Environmental Diseases developed a project to integrate basic occupational health services into primary care units to improve access for informal workers.
3) An evaluation found the primary care units were able to provide some basic occupational health activities and over 700,000 farmers received services, demonstrating the potential of this integrated model.
Long term conditions like diabetes place a large burden on healthcare systems. A study in Yorkshire examined experiences providing care for long term conditions. It found that telehealth interventions can reduce hospital admissions, bed days, and costs while improving patients' quality of life. The Whole System Demonstrator Programme trial of telehealth and telecare in various UK regions showed a 45% reduction in mortality rates and 20% fewer emergency admissions among other benefits. Telehealth represents an opportunity to deliver more specialized care while reducing strain on hospitals and caregivers.
Health Record Banks are Essential for Effective Health Information Infrastruc...WCIT 2014
The document discusses how current health information exchange efforts are failing to achieve comprehensive electronic patient records and effective prevention and population health. It proposes that health record banks can address these challenges by providing a centralized repository for complete patient records, incentivizing electronic health record adoption, and generating revenue to fund prevention services. The Health and Prevention Promotion Initiative (HAPPI) would combine a community prevention organization with a health record bank in order to achieve the goals of a successful health information infrastructure and the "Triple Aim" of better health, better care, and lower costs. Next steps include piloting HAPPI programs with external funding and disseminating lessons learned.
The document summarizes eHealth in Denmark, outlining its vision of providing coherent clinical pathways through the healthcare system focused on patient needs. It notes that digitalization is key to giving healthcare professionals access to patient data across the system. Denmark has several eHealth solutions in place and aims to better integrate and streamline how patient data is accessed and shared. The healthcare system in Denmark is decentralized and universal, with regions and municipalities responsible for providing most services like hospitals, general practitioners, and dental care.
HealthCare System in Thailand:Past -
Present and Where is the Future ?
Dr. Pradit Sintavanarong
Minister of Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
ริชมอนด์ 11-10-56
This document discusses telehealth models in 21st century healthcare. It provides an overview of telehealth definitions and benefits, including improving access to care for aging and chronic disease populations. The University of Virginia Center for Telehealth is presented as a case study, serving over 41,000 patients across Virginia through telestroke, telepsychiatry, tele-ophthalmology and remote patient monitoring programs. The document concludes with discussing needed policy changes to improve Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and licensing requirements to further support telehealth expansion.
Integrated care aims to provide proactive, coordinated care for patients through collaboration between health sectors. It involves collecting common patient data, stratifying patients by risk level, and creating joint care plans in cross-sector teams. The goals are to improve the patient experience through more coherent care, support self-management, and make the health system more sustainable by preventing unnecessary hospitalizations and costs. An integrated care project in Odense has established the necessary foundations and is currently testing collaboration models and common digital tools for elderly patients and those with mental health issues, with the first patients enrolled. The project will be fully operational on September 1, 2014 and evaluated by the end of 2015.
The document discusses how Continua and oneM2M can help develop the personal connected healthcare market. It describes the opportunity for remote monitoring and home-based care given aging populations and rising healthcare costs. Continua provides interoperability guidelines for connected health devices and data sharing. oneM2M can further enable an ecosystem by providing a common service platform and data model. Together, Continua and oneM2M allow standardized collection, distribution and application of health information to improve care coordination and outcomes.
- The document outlines Thailand's health system and recent reforms towards universal health coverage.
- Key aspects include establishing the National Health Security Office in 2003 to provide quality healthcare access for all Thai citizens. The Universal Coverage scheme was launched, replacing the previous 30 Baht policy.
- Community hospitals and health centers play an important role in implementing healthcare policies and providing easily accessible primary care services at the local level.
Wrap-up: Creating & Managing New Models of Care in ThailandBorwornsom Leerapan
This document summarizes Borwornsom Leerapan's lecture on creating and managing new models of care in Thailand. It discusses Thailand's health systems and financing, including the three main public insurance schemes (CSMBS, SSS, UCS), private insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. It also reviews levels of the health system including primary care, chronic care, palliative care, and long-term care. Key challenges addressed are rapidly rising costs, coverage only while employed, and inadequate budgets for public schemes. The lecture aims to provide lessons for improving Thailand's future health care system.
Read the final report of The Parliamentary Review about the future of health and social care in Wales. Parliamentary Review published a report which is produced in 12 months focused on the sustainability of health and social care in Wales.
https://gov.wales/topics/health/nhswales/review/?lang=en
Ian Blunt & Martin Bardsley: Cause for concernQualityWatch
This document summarizes the work of the Nuffield Trust and Health Foundation's QualityWatch program, which monitors and comments on the quality of health and social care in the UK. The program uses indicators to measure changes in quality over time, conducts in-depth analyses on specific topics, publishes an annual report, and maintains a website. The 2014 annual statement expressed concerns that quality appears to be declining in some areas like access to services and staff stress levels, while mental health and equity issues remain problematic. The statement analyzed trends in these areas and posed questions about addressing gaps in performance, targeting support, and improving quality measurement.
This document summarizes a presentation given by Neil Dugdale of Sobi (Swedish Orphan Biovitrum) at the 2017 Cambridge Rare Disease Network Summit. The presentation discusses Sobi's work in rare diseases, including developing orphan drugs, partnering with patient advocacy groups, and donating factor therapy to expand treatment access for hemophilia in developing countries. Sobi aims to pioneer new approaches to rare disease management through multi-stakeholder engagement and community co-creation.
Mike Bewick: Primary care transformation: what for and whyThe King's Fund
Mike Bewick looks at the challenges currently facing primary care in the NHS, including unacceptable variations in care, oversupply and undersupply in the health workforce, and the impact of an ageing population. What would great primary care look like in an ideal world?
Brochure to promote HSCIC work in public health, screening, data services and data linkage, to show how to support better care for lifestyle choices, such as diet, smoking and drinking.
This document summarizes findings from the HOPE Exchange Programme on innovations in hospital and healthcare organization and management. Participants identified innovations in several areas across different European countries, including: centralizing care services; increasing home and community-based care; optimizing clinical pathways; empowering nurses' roles; implementing multidisciplinary care teams; and facilitating health data sharing and telemedicine. The document provides examples of specific innovations in various countries and discusses trends toward more patient-centered and integrated care models.
Achieving Universal Access To Quality HealthcareAllison Koehn
The document discusses strategies to achieve universal access to quality healthcare in Malaysia. It summarizes progress made during the 10th Malaysia Plan in improving health status and healthcare services. However, issues remain such as inadequate access to care, increasing disease burden from communicable and non-communicable diseases, and pressure on the healthcare system. The 11th Malaysia Plan aims to address these by enhancing support for underserved groups, improving system delivery for better outcomes, and expanding capacity and collaboration with other sectors.
- Many health and social care services in England provide good quality care, despite challenges, but substantial variation remains. 71% of adult social care and 83% of GP practices were rated good, though some receive poor care.
- Some services are improving, but others are failing to improve or experiencing deterioration. Almost half of services rated "requires improvement" did not change after re-inspection.
- Demand is unprecedented due to an aging population with complex needs, stretching budgets. By 2015/16, NHS providers overspent £2.45 billion and councils spent £168 million more than planned.
- Adult social care sustainability may be reaching a tipping point, affecting hospitals through more emergency admissions and delayed discharges
The document summarizes a social marketing program called "Getting the Right Treatment" implemented in Tower Hamlets, London from 2005-2008 to address misuse of accident and emergency (A&E) services, particularly among the Bangladeshi community. Phase 1 involved a "Local Heroes" campaign using community health guides to promote alternative local health services, resulting in a 6.4% decline in A&E attendances. Phase 2 involved reconfiguring access systems and expanding alternative services, increasing cases managed and attendance at walk-in centers. Both phases aimed to reduce A&E use and increase uptake of alternative local services through community outreach, marketing, and expanding access to primary care options.
This document discusses prevention and health promotion in healthcare across Europe. It defines what good prevention and health promotion looks like, including health education programs, adult and child immunization policies, disease screening programs, infection prevention policies, and improving secondary prevention through risk factor reduction. The document emphasizes that while policymakers acknowledge the need to shift focus to prevention, progress has been variable. It argues that prevention is a cost-effective investment that can improve health and reduce disease burden and health inequalities.
Quality health improvement initiativeOne of the recent quality hjanekahananbw
Quality health improvement initiative
One of the recent quality health improvement initiatives is having a systematic and data-driven approach that reduces the length of stay but improves treatment efficiency—Gulfport memorial hospital. The main reason why the health facility started the initiative is that the revenue was so low, and the costs of operations escalated because of Medicare and Medicaid settlements (Griffiths, 2018). The management had to derive a way that would allow service providers and at the same time reduce or maintain the standard rates so that they did not burden the children's families. The approach also involves improving care conditions by improving and lowering the length of stay.
Similarly, the patient is also prevented from hospital-acquired conditions. For instance, during the Covid 19 pandemic, patients can easily contract the virus because of its spread. The surfaces and contact with other patients make them more vulnerable to contracting Covid 19. Other conditions spread in the hospital may include pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and bloodstream infections. The initiative looks to provide the best services and ensure that the facilities discharge patients sooner unless family members cannot manage the condition outside the facility. Only critical conditions are admitted into the medical facilities. For instance, patients in ICU can stay in the hospital until they are medically cleared to leave the facility. The rest of the conditions are treated with the best care, and if need be, the patient can pop in for a checkup at agreed intervals. Therefore, those who are treated and allowed to go home become less vulnerable to getting other infections, and the quality of their lives improves.
The nurses' role in the initiative was to help the doctors to monitor patients and keep the records that are used to determine which of the patients should be admitted and which ones can be discharged. They also help to advise the patients why they should opt for a shorter stay and how it makes them less vulnerable to contracting hospital acquired infections. Since the medical facility uses data driven approach, the nurses can also take part in decision making because they interact more with the patients and can analyze the reports and record the patients' progress (Schmitt et al., 2019). The doctors will use these records to determine which patients can be allowed to go home and which situations require them to stay longer in the facility.
The outcome of the initiative was reduced costs of keeping the patient in the medical facilities. In so doing, the health center lowers maintenance costs and financial burden on the patient. Gulfport memorial hospital also adopted a systematic data-driven approach that keeps records and showing the initiative's progress. The results showed that the facility saved $2 million in one year because the medical facility needed fewer supplies. Coordination care also improved, and an increase ...
Gill Rowlands Heath Literacy - Making it Everybody's BusinessHLGUK
- The document discusses a presentation on health literacy given by Gill Rowlands.
- It defines health literacy and establishes that low health literacy is common, affecting 61% of adults in England. People with low health literacy have poorer health outcomes and higher healthcare costs.
- Challenges of low health literacy are discussed for patients, healthcare professionals, managers and commissioners. Solutions proposed include improving health information and increasing citizens' health literacy skills.
- Progress and next steps are outlined to address the issue through various organizations working together.
The document summarizes the efforts of the English National Health Service (NHS) to reduce wait times for patients and improve overall system performance between 1997-2009. Key points include:
1) NHS prioritized reducing wait times which had become a top public concern. Targets were introduced to drive down waits for emergency care, elective procedures, outpatient appointments and diagnostics.
2) In addition to targets, system reforms like increased transparency, patient choice of providers, and competition helped incentivize improvements.
3) Wait times fell dramatically across all areas, often meeting or exceeding targets. This correlated with improved health outcomes like lower in-hospital mortality rates.
4) A combination of government support
The document outlines the opportunities and challenges presented by big data in healthcare. It notes that vast amounts of data are now being generated from sources like genome sequencing, electronic health records, social media, and patient websites. However, simply having large datasets does not guarantee value; the data needs to be analyzed and linked together to generate insights. The document discusses four levels of big data applications from processing large volumes of data to complex modeling. It also examines challenges like developing robust governance, embracing new data uses, overcoming data fragmentation, ensuring data quality and standards, developing innovative analytic methods, addressing skills shortages, and achieving returns on investment. The goal is to improve patient outcomes and healthcare cost-effectiveness through big data.
Similar to Prioritising Skin Health in Wales 2016 eng (20)
1. Prioritising Skin
Health in Wales
LANDSCAPING REPORT • 2016
Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
www.skincarecymru.org
2. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 1
Acknowledgements 2
Introduction 3
Methodology 4
Findings 5
Moving Forward 12
Appendix 13
Contents
Contents
3. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 2
We would like to express our gratitude to the staff from Local Health Boards
(LHBs) in Wales who committed time to collating the information requested to
prepare this report.
Our thanks also go to Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright at the Swansea University
Medical School for their input and support producing this report.
Skin Care Cymru is a volunteer run charity. We are a patient support group, giving a voice
to those with any skin condition in Wales. We also act as the secretariat for the Cross Party
Group on Skin and we are grateful to the Chair, Nick Ramsay, AM and members of this CPG
for raising awareness of this report.
Skin Care Cymru Management Committee
Cover image: Shutterstock 2016
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
With thanks to the following organisations for their support
4. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 3
National estimates indicate that every year over 1.5m people in Wales experience a skin
condition and that over 720,000 people visit a GP with a skin complaint1
. While the severity
of skin conditions can vary significantly, a recent report from the All Party Parliamentary
Group (APPG) on Skin found that the psychological and social impact of skin diseases on
people’s lives is significant2
. In some instances that impact is comparable to other chronic
conditions such as heart disease and diabetes. Despite this, the provision of dermatology
services in the English NHS is limited.
The situation in Wales is even more complicated
as there is very little publicly available
information on the provision or quality of
dermatology services. Anecdotally, it is apparent
that service provision is a particular concern,
while some of the issues that are common in
England, such as waiting times and workforce
issues, also exist in Wales. As the information is
not currently in one place it is difficult to make
a strong case to politicians and policy leaders
about the need to reform the health system
and ensure that patients are able to access the
services and treatments that they need.
Ascertaining a clear understanding of the
provision of care and treatment to people in
Wales living with skin disease and conditions
plays an important role in informing clinical
practices and consequently improving the quality
of care for patients. Skin Care Cymru recognised
that a gap existed in information related to
understanding the landscape of health services
for people in Wales with skin conditions.
In order to address some of these challenges,
Skin Care Cymru conducted a survey to assess
the variation in the quality of secondary care
dermatology services and patient experience in
Wales. This short report highlights the landscape
within which services are provided across Wales
to people with skin conditions.
At the outset of this data gathering exercise
the intention was to report on the prevalence
of skin conditions; the local strategies
established to improve outcomes for people
with skin conditions; the ratios of dermatology
consultants and specialist nurses to patients;
the waiting times for appointments and the
availability of psychodermatology services and
mental health support.
Whilst responses were not provided by all seven
LHBs in Wales, the analysis for this report has
elicited important information and issues that
warrant the attention of the Welsh Government
and other key stakeholders in health in Wales.
However, these results should be considered
alongside other publications in the public
domain, which cover similar issues related to
stretched services in the NHS.
This data gathering exercise, conducted using
freedom of information requests sent to
Corporate Information Governance departments
across the seven LHBs, was designed not as a
rigorous scientific study, but as an approach to
try to source intelligence relating to the status
of dermatology and plastic surgery services and
their related capacity to deliver care in the NHS
in Wales in 2015.
The full anonymised data gathered to inform
this report are available via the Skin Care Cymru
website (www.skincarecymru.org) and we would
urge policy makers to consult this data set.
1
Schofield J, Grindlay D and Williams H. Skin Conditions in the UK: A Health Care Needs Assessment. Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology,
University of Nottingham, 2009.
2
The Psychological and Social Impact of Skin Diseases on People’s Lives’ Report by the APPG on Skin, 2013.
Introduction
Introduction
5. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 4
All of the seven Welsh LHBs were sent a
freedom of information act request at the
beginning of July 2015:
Methodology
Methodology
Image source: www.diabetes.org.uk
Issues relating to the collection of data
• Despite the mandatory requirement to
respond to Freedom of Information (FOI)
requests within 20 days, repeated reminders
were necessary to retrieve the Health Board
responses. Some Health Boards required
further clarification in order to provide the
information requested which extended the
data collection period.
• In total five of the seven Health Boards
returned the FOI requests. One Health Board
responded to the request informing Skin
Care Cymru that they could not provide the
information, citing their right to FOI exemption
and responded that it would cost too much
and take too much staff time to deal with the
data request. Another Health Board did not
respond. Those Health Boards that did respond
were unable to provide detailed breakdowns
for some questions and only provided data at
a summary level. Some stated that responses
would require individual review of patient
records, whilst other LHBs did not record data
at a detailed level.
• The first response was received by 18th
August,
with the final response received by 19th
October.
We have reported the findings from the five
responding Health Boards anonymously and
they are referred to as Health Board A, B, or C,
D and E in this report.
Specific questions were organised into four sections:
• Service design and makeup
• Consultation and needs assessment
• Specific service usage (dermatology)
• Specific service usage (plastic surgery services)
(A copy of the freedom of information request
can be found in Appendix 1)
The Health Boards were given until the end of
October 2015 to respond to the request.The
purpose of this request was to ascertain: the
skin care services available within each LHB; the
provision of specialist and community services;
the volume of patient throughput through their
dermatology and plastic surgery services; staffing
levels available to support dermatology clinics;
and protocols used to support their services.
Betsi Cadwaladr
Abertawe Bro Morgannwg
Cwm Taf
Hywel Dda
Cardiff and Vale
Aneurin Bevan
Powys
6. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 5
Evidence of usage of services across Wales in Dermatology
The majority of Health Boards only provided information at a summary level so we were unable to
make comparisons on a condition specific basis. There has been a steady increase in the number
of referrals since 2010.
Figure 1 presents the total number of referrals made from primary care to local secondary care
specialised dermatology services each year as reported by five LHBs in Wales.
Figure 1: Illustrates the number of referrals from primary to secondary care specialised dermatology
services (2010-2015)
Notes: No data available for Health Board B. *No data available for Health Board A for 2010; Data only available between April and December
2010 for Health Board E. **Data collection period January-June 2015 for Health Boards A-D; January-August for Health Board E.
Figures 2 and 3 present the number of patients attending for a new outpatient or a follow-up
appointment in dermatology between 2010 and 2015.
The graphs illustrate and provide evidence that there is an increasing number of both new and
follow-up dermatology patients placing demands on the dermatology services across the five
responding LHBs.
E D C B A
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
2010*
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015**
Findings
Findings
7. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 6
Figure 4 illustrates the number of patients undergoing dermatology day-case surgery within each
of the Health Boards.
There has been no major increase in the number of surgical day cases since 2010 across the
five responding LHBs.
Notes: *Data only available between April and December 2010 for
Health Board E. **Data collection period January-June 2015 for
Health Boards A-D; January-August for Health Board E.
Notes: No day surgery undertaken at Health Board B. *Data only
available between April and December 2010 for Health Board E.
**Data collection period January-June 2015 for Health Boards
A-D; January-August for Health Board E.
Notes: *Data only available between April and December 2010 for
Health Board E. **Data collection period January-June 2015 for
Health Boards A-D; January-August for Health Board E.
Notes: *Data only available between April and December 2010 for
Health Board E. **Data collection period January-June 2015 for
Health Boards A-D; January-August for Health Board E.
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
2010*
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015**
E D C B A
E D C B A
E D C B A
2010*
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015**
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
E D C B A
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2010*
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015**
Findings
2010*
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015**
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Figure 2: Illustrates the number of new outpatient
appointments in dermatology (2010-2015)
Figure 4: Illustrates the number of surgical day
cases in dermatology (2010-2015)
Figure 3: Illustrates the number of follow-up
outpatient appointments in dermatology (2010-2015)
Figure 5: Illustrates the number of dermatology
inpatient admissions at each Health Board between
2010 and 2015
8. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 7
Evidence of usage of services across Wales in Plastic Surgery
for those patients referred from dermatology departments
Only two of the five responding Health
Boards referred patients from secondary care
dermatology to plastic surgery services.
Only one of the referring Health Boards was
able to provide data since 2010 regarding
referrals. We were therefore unable to make
comparisons across Health Boards related
to the usage of services of patients with skin
conditions using plastic surgery services.
Only one of the five responding Health Boards
provided any plastic surgery services or
employed consultants in plastic surgery. We are
therefore unable to present any information
relating to plastic surgery posts, referrals and
appointments for comparative purposes.
Psychosocial support
There is limited access to psychodermatology services in Wales
Only two of the five responding Health Boards
provide access for patients to specialist
psychological/psychosocial support. Patients
with malignant disease in one of these Health
Boards had access to specialist psychosocial
support from the Cancer Services clinical
psychologists at all LHB sites. Patients who do
not have malignant disease however do not
have any access to psychosocial support, with
the exception of patients with mental health
conditions (who have access to support via
their GP and the Primary Care Mental Health
Support Service). The other Health Board
that provides access to psychosocial support
did so via the clinical psychologist based at
their local Cancer centre.
Care pathways - design and development
In terms of provision of care pathways for defined skin conditions, there were limited
‘in-house’ developed protocols. For many conditions there were no detailed protocols
in use. Most Health Boards used NICE guidelines/British Association of Dermatology
guidelines to inform the development of care pathways:
Findings
Condition Care pathway - Yes/No
Malignant melanoma
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: Under development
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: Based on NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
Squamous cell carcinoma
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: Under development
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: Based on NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
Skin cancer basal cell carcinoma
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: Under development
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: Based on NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
Table 1: Presents the protocols used across the LHBs in Wales
9. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 8
Findings
Table 1: Continued
Condition Care pathway - Yes/No
Pigmented lesions
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: No care pathway
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: No care pathway
Contact dermatitis
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: No care pathway
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: No care pathway
Paediatric dermatology
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: No care pathway
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: No care pathway
Vulval disorders
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: No care pathway
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: No care pathway
Leg ulcers
A: Through wound clinic, using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: No care pathway
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: No care pathway
Acne
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: Care pathway in place-no details given
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: No care pathway
Eczema
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: Care pathway in place based on NICE guidelines
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: No care pathway
Psoriasis
A: Based on referral criteria using NICE guidance
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: Care pathway in place based on NICE guidelines
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: No care pathway
Allergy
A: No-managed by Immunology at LHB
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: No care pathway in place
D: Through collaboration with primary care colleagues and produced in line
with NICE and British Association of Dermatology guidelines
E: No care pathway
Other
A: N/A
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
C: Patch testing care pathway - no details given
Other
A: N/A
B: Provided by visiting consultants and their host organisations
10. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 9
Findings
Table 2: Presents the status of the dermatology workforce in the responding LHBs in Wales
Service reviews - frequency and involvement by service users
Despite lack of care pathways, four of the five responding Health Boards are undertaking a number
of positive activities to identify health care needs or requirements relating to skincare services.
Here follows a list of current activities taking place across Wales:
• Close working with Neighbourhood Care Networks
• Dermatology Patient Panels
• Review of previous activity for residents in
external providers
• Discussion with local lead GPs from each of the
local practices
• Review of equipment/clinic requirement needs
• Consideration of any daycase surgery which
could be undertaken
• Onward referral pathways into neighbouring
organisations
• Clinical governance requirements for a community
hospital theatre
• Identification of risks
• Stakeholder engagement
• Financial analysis of dermatology services in LHB
• Head, Neck and Skin Population Health Group
• Annual planning process using population needs
assessment, capacity and demand analysis
Question
Number of posts
(per Health Board A-E)
Whole Time Equivalent (WTE)
(per Health Board A-E)
How many consultant dermatologists do you
employ within your LHB?
A: 7 posts (6 prior to Aug 15)
B: Sessional basis only
C: 1
D: 2
E: 7
A: 5.2 WTE (4.2 Aug 15)
B: N /A
C: 1WTE
D: 2.1 WTE
E: 7 WTE
How many consultant dermatologist
vacancies currently exist within your LHB?
A: 2 posts
B: N/A
C: 1
D: 2
E: 1
A: 2 WTE
B: N/A
C: 1WTE
D: 1.6 WTE
E: 1WTE
How many locum dermatology consultants
are employed by the LHB?
A: 2 locum consultants
(+ 1 acting up)
B: N/A
C: 0
D: 0
E: 0
A: 0.4WTE
B: N/A
C: 0 WTE
D: 0 WTE
E: 0 WTE
If you employ locum dermatology
consultants, how many are not on the
specialist register
A: 1
B: N/A
C: N/A
D: N/A
E: N/A
A: 0.2 WTE
B: N/A
C: N/A
D: N/A
E: N/A
If you have locum consultant dermatologists-
how long have they been in post?
A: 12 months
B: N/A
C: N/A
D: N/A
E: N/A
Workforce - a crisis?
The five responding Health Boards provided detailed information in relation to dermatology staff and
recruitment. The analysis of the findings indicates a lack of consultant dermatologists in Wales as
well as a low number of locum consultants working in this area of health.
11. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 10
Findings
Table 3: Presents the responses from the LHBs to the questions related to reviewing service delivery
Table 2: Continued
The analysis of the findings shows that there are dermatology services operating with consultant
level and nursing vacancies and although efforts to fill these gaps were being made by the providers,
most of the services were operating with an understaffed secondary care dermatology service.
In response to specific queries regarding workforce planning the five Health Boards demonstrated
some evidence of dermatology review but limited evidence of increased workforce.
Question
Number of posts
(per Health Board A-E)
Whole Time Equivalent (WTE)
(per Health Board A-E)
Do you have dermatology nurse specialists
employed in secondary care in the LHB?
A: 7 posts (7 posts from
Sept 15) - some accredited
B: N/A
C: 4
D: 4
E: 14
A: 4 WTE (5WTE from Sept 15)
If you employ dermatology nurse specialists -
are they accredited?
A: Yes - some
B: N/A
C: Yes - some
D: No
E: Yes - some
N/A- Not applicable
Question Response from each Health Board (A-E)
Has your Health Board conducted
a healthcare needs assessment to
determine the likely level of demand
for a dermatology service?
A: Yes - demand and capacity reviewed annually
B: Yes - currently considering development of dermatology services
C: No
D: No
E: Informatics service carry this out using forecasting based on
population need and growth
Has your Health Board conducted a review
of current service provision?
A: Yes - Directorate and consultant meetings, job planning and vacancy
replacement. Also with Divisional team with Health Board via Integrated
Medium term plan (IMTP)
B: Yes - based on previous activity, referral information and contract datasets
from Commissioned services
C: Yes - currently under way
D: No
E: Informatics service carry this out using forecasting based on
population need and growth
When was the last time your Health
Board conduced a review of local
dermatology service demand in relation
to workforce capacity?
A: April 2015 in line with IMTP
B: N/A
C: Currently being conducted via a service review and by the current demand
and capacity reporting mechanisms for the delivery of
waiting time targets
D: No activities undertaken
E: Reviewed on an annual basis
When was the last time your Health Board
conduced a review of local plastic surgery
service demandand workforce capacity?
A: N/A
B: N/A
C: N/A
D: Commissioner funded 2 new posts approx 2 years ago
(Hand surgery and Head and Neck post)
E: N/A
N/A - Not applicable
12. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 11
Primary, Secondary and Community Care
In terms of the LHBs provision of dermatology
services, there was a wide variation across the
regions in terms of their service design and
makeup. In one LHB, patients do not have access
to community based dermatology services and
must therefore rely on expertise in primary care or
referral to secondary care services in another LHB.
Two of the five responding LHBs have dedicated
services delivered by GPs with a special interest
in dermatology. The analysis of the data also
indicates that there is a low number of GPwSI
(general practitioner with special interest) in
Wales, particularly in those LHBs where there are
also no community based dermatology services.
Question Response
Community based dermatology services?
A: Yes
B: Yes
C: Yes
D: No
E: Yes
Secondary care dermatology services?
A: Yes
B: No
C: Yes
D: Yes
E: Yes
Secondary care plastic surgery services?
A: No
B: No
C: No
D: Yes
E: No
GPwSI services?
A: No
B: No
C: Yes (Skin surgery- weekly clinic at local hospital
together with a community based clinic)
D: No
E: Yes (General dermatology and minor operations)
Dedicated ward space for dermatology inpatients?
A: Yes
B: No
C: No
D: No
E: Yes
Rapid access clinic for dermatology?
A: Yes (twice weekly)
B: No
C: No
D: Yes (weekly)
E: No
How are consultations for open access dermatology clinics
triggered/coordinated?
A: Consultations allocated as a result of GP
referrals, contact from patients or other health
care professionals
B: N/A
C: N/A
D: 4 Consultant-led ‘See and Treat’ clinics
E: N/A
Waiting time for urgent dermatology that does not come under
two week wait referral?
A: Less than two weeks
B: N/A
C: Maximum wait 18 working days
D: 15 days for an appointment in a surgical
treatment clinic
E: 21 day target for first outpatient appointment
- urgent suspected cancer (USC) for dermatology
N/A - Not applicable
Findings
Table 4: Presents the responses from five LHBs related to the delivery of primary, community and secondary
care services
13. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 12
Moving Forward
This report provides a short and by no means complete analysis of the data collected via
our freedom of information exercise. Acknowledging our capacity and resources we would
encourage all interested organisations or members of the public to access the full data set.
The analysis of the data has elicited issues, challenges and good practices in the delivery of health
care services to people in Wales living with skin conditions. It is our recommendation that the
following areas warrant the attention of Welsh Government and LHBs in order to improve the
experience and accessibility to high quality dermatology services for people in Wales:
• Work with LHBs to develop appropriate and
standardised frameworks for collecting and
monitoring routine data related to service
usage and health and patient related outcomes
for people with skin conditions which can then
direct the development of services and
re-design of existing services.
• Understand and respond to the capacity
issues and under-resourced dermatology
departments in several LHBs in Wales.
• Develop dedicated psychodermatology services
for local populations in Wales, so that people in
Wales living with skin conditions can access the
appropriate support to manage and live with
their skin condition.
Moving Forward
14. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 13
Appendix
Consultation and Needs Assessment
1) Does your LHB put community dermatology services locally out to tender? Yes/No
If Yes, do you do this for all community dermatology services? Or some dermatology services?
Give details of what community dermatology services you put out to tender?
2) Do you have care pathways for
the following skin conditions?
Please append any detailed protocols:
Condition Care pathway Y/N
Malignant melanoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Skin Cancer Basal Cell
Carcinoma
Pigmented lesions
Contact dermatitis
Paediatric dermatology
Vulval disorders
Leg ulcers
Acne
Eczema
Psoriasis
Allergy
Other (please specify)
Other (please specify)
3) How were care pathways informed?
A: Informed by new guidance (please specify)
B: Implemented following LHB audit
C: Informed by consultation with public
and other key stakeholders
D: Other (please specify)
4) What activities do you undertake to identify
the local health care need or requirements for
service redesign? (please list and give specific
examples in relation to dermatology)
5) Has the LHB conducted:
A: A healthcare needs assessment to determine
the likely level of demand for a dermatology
service? Yes/No
B: A review of current service provision?
Yes/No If Yes, Please provide details of how
this was conducted.
Service Design and Makeup
1) Do you have any community based dermatology services within your LHB? Yes/No
If Yes, where are they based and who is the service provided by?
2) Do you have any secondary care dermatology services provided within your LHB? Yes/No
If Yes, by whom and where are community and secondary care dermatology services provided within
your LHB?
3) Do you have any secondary care plastic surgery services provided within your LHB? Yes/No
If Yes, by whom and where are community and secondary care plastic surgery
services provided?
4) Which of these services are:
A: contracted as consultant led 18-week services
Community care dermatology service Yes/No
Secondary care dermatology service Yes/No
Secondary care plastic surgery service Yes/No
B: GPs with special interests GPwSI services
Community care dermatology service Yes/No
Secondary care dermatology service Yes/No
Secondary care plastic surgery service Yes/No
C: secondary care nurse services
Community care dermatology service Yes/No
Secondary care dermatology service Yes/No
Secondary care plastic surgery service Yes/No
5) Does the LHB contract directly with GPwSI
services? Yes/No If yes, what dermatology
services are offered by GPwSI(s).
Please provide details below:
6) If you have a GPwSI dermatology service
directly contracted by the LHB do all the GPwSIs:
A: deliver a monthly clinic at their local hospital
or Yes/No
B: have access to another consultant
dermatologist resource Yes/No
Please provide details below:
Appendix 1
Freedom of information
request for LHBs in Wales.
15. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 14
Appendix
10) Please provide activity levels for the service, according to specific skin conditions, for the
last five financial years (2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015) for:
Condition
Jan-Dec
2010
Jan-Dec
2011
Jan-Dec
2012
Jan-Dec
2013
Jan-Dec
2014
Jan-June
2015
Malignant melanoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Skin cancer basal cell carcinoma
Pigmented lesions
Contact dermatitis
Paediatric dermatology
Vulval disorders
Leg ulcers
Acne
Eczema
Psoriasis
Allergy
6) When was the last time your LHB conducted
a review of local dermatology service demand
in relation to workforce capacity?
7) When was the last time your LHB
conducted a review of local plastic surgery
service demand and workforce capacity?
Specific service usage questions (dermatology)
1) How many consultant dermatologists do
you employ within your LHB broken down by:
A: posts B: WTE?
2) How many consultant dermatologist
vacancies currently exist within your LHB
broken down by:
A: posts B: WTE?
3) How many locum dermatology consultants
are employed by the LHB broken down by:
A: posts B: WTE?
4) If you employ locum dermatology
consultants, how many are not on the
specialist register?
5) Of the above locum consultant
dermatologists how many have been
in post for:
A: longer than 12 months
B: longer than 24 months
C: longer than 36 months
D: longer than 48 months
6) Is your local specialist secondary care
dermatology service fully staffed? Yes/No
If you have vacancies:
A: where in the LHB does this specialised
secondary care dermatology service vacancy/
vacancies exist?
B: have you advertised them?
C: how many times have you advertised
each vacancy?
7) Do you have any dermatology nurse
specialists employed in secondary care in
the LHB? Yes/No If Yes, where are these
nurses located and how many in total does
the LHB employ?
8) If you employ dermatology nurse specialists
- are these nurses accredited dermatology
nurse practitioners?
Yes all accredited
Yes some accredited
No none accredited
9) Within your LHB area, how many GPs are
providing skin surgery locally? Where are
they located?
16. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 15
11) How many routine referrals are made from primary care to your local secondary care
specialised dermatology services each year?
Condition
Jan-Dec
2010
Jan-Dec
2011
Jan-Dec
2012
Jan-Dec
2013
Jan-Dec
2014
Jan-June
2015
Malignant melanoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Skin cancer basal cell carcinoma
Pigmented lesions
Contact dermatitis
Paediatric dermatology
Vulval disorders
Leg ulcers
Acne
Eczema
Psoriasis
Allergy
Surveillance (nurse-led)
12) How many patients attended for a new outpatient appointment in dermatology?
Condition
Jan-Dec
2010
Jan-Dec
2011
Jan-Dec
2012
Jan-Dec
2013
Jan-Dec
2014
Jan-June
2015
Malignant melanoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Skin cancer basal cell carcinoma
Pigmented lesions
Contact dermatitis
Paediatric dermatology
Vulval disorders
Leg ulcers
Acne
Eczema
Psoriasis
Allergy
Surveillance (nurse-led)
13) How many patients attended follow-up outpatient appointments in dermatology?
Condition
Jan-Dec
2010
Jan-Dec
2011
Jan-Dec
2012
Jan-Dec
2013
Jan-Dec
2014
Jan-June
2015
Malignant melanoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Skin cancer basal cell carcinoma
Pigmented lesions
Contact dermatitis
Paediatric dermatology
Vulval disorders
Leg ulcers
Acne
Eczema
Psoriasis
Allergy
Surveillance (nurse-led)
Appendix
17. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 16
Appendix
14) How many patients had dermatology surgery in the LHB? (day cases in secondary care)
Condition
Jan-Dec
2010
Jan-Dec
2011
Jan-Dec
2012
Jan-Dec
2013
Jan-Dec
2014
Jan-June
2015
Malignant melanoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Skin cancer basal cell carcinoma
Pigmented lesions
Contact dermatitis
Paediatric dermatology
Vulval disorders
Leg ulcers
Acne
Eczema
Psoriasis
Allergy
Surveillance (nurse-led)
15) How many dermatology inpatient admissions were there in your LHB?
Condition
Jan-Dec
2010
Jan-Dec
2011
Jan-Dec
2012
Jan-Dec
2013
Jan-Dec
2014
Jan-June
2015
Malignant melanoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Skin cancer basal cell carcinoma
Pigmented lesions
Contact dermatitis
Paediatric dermatology
Vulval disorders
Leg ulcers
Acne
Eczema
Psoriasis
Allergy
Surveillance (nurse-led)
16) Do you have dedicated ward space for
dermatology inpatients within your LHB?
No not in any sites
Yes in all sites
Yes in some sites (please specify)
17) What is the waiting time in your LHB for
urgent dermatology referrals that do come
under the category of a two week wait referral?
Please provide details below:
18) Does the LHB operate a rapid access clinic
for dermatology?
Yes/No If Yes:
A: what is the frequency of these clinics?
B: how are these consultations coordinated
/triggered?
18. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 17
Appendix
19) In terms of new to follow up referrals
coming in, within your agreed contracts, has
the LHB ever flagged up unmet need in the
last five financial years (2010-2015)?
If so, how much was this unmet need?
Please provide details below:
20) In each of the last five financial years
(2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014,
2014-2015) for how many patients have you
breached your two week wait targets for
cancer referrals?
Year No of patients
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 (to date)
21) In each of the last five financial years (2010-
2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-
2015) how many patients with skin cancer have
been referred from secondary care dermatology
services to plastic surgery services?
Year No of patients
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 (to date)
22) Do dermatology patients have access to
specialist psychological/psychosocial support
services in the LHB? Yes/No
Yes in all sites Yes in some sites No
Please specify the types of services offered:
23) Please provide details of who provides this
psychological/psychsocial service, details of the
service and the details of the posts available
(eg WTE, located at which hospital site)?
Specific service usage questions (plastic surgery services)
1) How many consultant plastic surgeons do
you employ within your LHB broken down by:
A: posts B: WTE?
C: Specialism in skin cancer
2) How many consultant plastic surgeon
vacancies currently exist within your LHB
broken down by:
A: posts B: WTE?
C: Specialism in skin cancer
3) How many plastic surgery locum consultants
are employed by the LHB broken down by:
A: posts B: WTE?
4) If you employ plastic surgery locums, how
many are not on the specialist registry?
5) Of the above locum consultants how many
have been in post for:
A: longer than 12 months
B: longer than 24 months
C: longer than 36 months
D: longer than 48 months
6) Is your local specialist secondary care
plastic surgery service fully staffed? Yes/No
If you have vacancies:
A: where in the LHB are these vacancies?
B: have you advertised them?
C: how many times have you advertised
each vacancy?
7) How many nurse specialists are employed
in plastic surgery to manage skin cancer in the
LHB in secondary care?
If so, where are these nurses located and how
many in total does the LHB employ?
8) Are these nurses accredited skin cancer
nurse practitioners?
Yes all accredited
Yes some accredited
No none accredited
19. Prioritising Skin Health in Wales • Dr Hayley Hutchings and Dr Sarah Wright
Page 18
Appendix
9) How many routine referrals are made from
primary care to your local specialised plastic
surgery service each year for patients with
skin cancer?
Year No of patients
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 (to date)
10) What are the other sources of referral for
new skin cancer patients to your specialised
plastic surgery service?
11) How many skin cancer patients attend for a
new outpatient appointment in plastic surgery?
Year No of patients
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 (to date)
12) How many skin cancer patients attend
follow-up outpatient appointments in
plastic surgery?
Year No of patients
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 (to date)
13) How many plastic surgery day cases in
secondary care (skin cancer)?
Year No of patients
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 (to date)
14) How many plastic surgery inpatient
admissions in your LHB (skin cancer)?
Year No of patients
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 (to date)
15) Do you have dedicated ward space for skin
cancer inpatients? If Yes, where are these
located in the LHB?
16) What’s the waiting time for urgent skin
cancer referrals in plastic surgery that do not
fall under a two week wait referral?
17) Does the LHB operate a rapid access clinic
for skin cancer patients in plastic surgery
services? If so:
A: What is the frequency of these clinics?
B: How are they triggered?
C: Where are these located in the LHB?
We would like to request permission to re-publish the
information receivedin a publically accessible format.